CN110470738B - Structural damage identification method based on vibration response difference ratio function - Google Patents
Structural damage identification method based on vibration response difference ratio function Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN110470738B CN110470738B CN201910777483.9A CN201910777483A CN110470738B CN 110470738 B CN110470738 B CN 110470738B CN 201910777483 A CN201910777483 A CN 201910777483A CN 110470738 B CN110470738 B CN 110470738B
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- vibration response
- matrix
- function
- frequency response
- damage
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N29/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic waves; Visualisation of the interior of objects by transmitting ultrasonic or sonic waves through the object
- G01N29/04—Analysing solids
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N2291/00—Indexing codes associated with group G01N29/00
- G01N2291/02—Indexing codes associated with the analysed material
- G01N2291/023—Solids
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N2291/00—Indexing codes associated with group G01N29/00
- G01N2291/02—Indexing codes associated with the analysed material
- G01N2291/028—Material parameters
- G01N2291/0289—Internal structure, e.g. defects, grain size, texture
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Acoustics & Sound (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
- Biochemistry (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Immunology (AREA)
- Pathology (AREA)
- Testing Of Devices, Machine Parts, Or Other Structures Thereof (AREA)
Abstract
A structural damage identification method based on a vibration response difference ratio function is characterized in that after a vibration response measuring point of a structure to be detected is determined, a frequency response function matrix and a global transfer rate matrix of the structure to be detected are calculated according to measured data, and a vibration response difference ratio function and a full transfer rate matrix are obtained through comparison calculation with an undamaged structure, so that structural damage detection and positioning are achieved. The invention only needs a small amount of vibration measurement work, has simple implementation process and greatly improves the adaptability and operability of the vibration response analysis method in the complex structure health detection problem.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to a technology in the field of mechanical flaw detection, in particular to a structural damage identification method based on a vibration response difference ratio function.
Background
The method is characterized in that a large mechanical structure, a building structure and the like are inevitably affected by factors such as chemical corrosion, external load, material degradation and the like in the service process to generate structural damage and affect the structural strength of the large mechanical structure, the existing structural damage identification method mainly comprises an ultrasonic method, a vortex current method, an X-ray method, a vibration response method and the like, wherein the vibration response method is widely adopted due to low cost and easy realization of on-line continuous monitoring. The vibration response structure damage method is mainly divided into two types: a test data based identification method and a model based identification method. The disadvantage of the model-based identification method is that it is difficult to build an accurate model of the structure, and it is not possible to take the environment and the uncertainty of the physical parameters into account, and it is easy to generate wrong conclusions. The identification method based on the test data only uses the vibration response data obtained by the experimental test to identify the structural damage, and has many advantages, such as no need of modal parameter identification on the structure, no need of establishing a numerical value or an analytic model of the structure, and the method can effectively detect and quantify the structural damage, but has great limitation in the aspect of structural damage positioning.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention provides a structural damage identification method based on a vibration response difference ratio function, which aims at the defects in the prior art, can effectively extract and quantify the change of the vibration response relation caused by the structural damage according to the vibration response difference ratio, realizes the accurate detection and positioning of the structural damage, only needs a small amount of vibration measurement work, has simple implementation process and greatly improves the adaptability and operability of the vibration response analysis method in the complex structure health detection problem.
The invention is realized by the following technical scheme:
according to the invention, after the vibration response measuring point of the structure to be detected is determined, the frequency response function matrix and the global transfer rate matrix of the structure to be detected are calculated according to the measured data, and the vibration response difference ratio function and the full transfer rate matrix are obtained by comparing and calculating with the undamaged structure, so that the structure damage detection and positioning are realized.
The vibration response measuring point comprises a potential damage point and a reference point, and specifically, a part of an obviously vulnerable structure is determined as the potential damage point of the system structure and a part of an obviously non-vulnerable structure is determined as the reference point according to the characteristics of the structure, the loading condition, the environmental influence and the historical record information of the structure damage point.
The measured data is an acceleration signal and is measured by an acceleration sensor arranged at a potential damage point and a reference point.
The frequency response function matrix and the global transfer rate matrix of the structure to be detected refer to: calculating to obtain a frequency response function matrix according to all frequency response functions between the potential damage points and the reference pointsWherein:for applying a force F at the undamaged structure S1S1Vibration response at SnThe frequency response function of the two-way filter,global transmissibility matrix
The step of comparing and calculating the undamaged structure to obtain a vibration response difference ratio function refers to the following steps: calculating according to the frequency response function matrix of the undamaged structure to obtain the difference value of the frequency response functions of the undamaged structure, and further calculating to obtain a vibration response difference ratio function, wherein the calculation specifically comprises the following steps: frequency response function matrix of undamaged structureWherein: hSnS1For applying a force F at the undamaged structure S1S1With vibration response X at SnSnFrequency response function between HSnS1=XSn/FS1(ii) a Potential damage points are S1 and S2 … Sn, and a reference point is R; difference of frequency response functionVibration response difference ratio function
The structural damage detection and positioning means that: when in useIf the absolute values of all elements in the index matrix are smaller than the corresponding elements of the set index threshold matrix, the structure to be detected is considered not to be damaged, otherwise, the structure to be detected is considered to be damaged; when the structure is detected to be damaged, the difference value of the vibration response difference ratio function matrix and the global transmissibility matrix of the undamaged structure is determinedComputing its expansion as a column vector representationThe modulus of the column vector in (b) represents the position where the damage occurs, and the subscript corresponding to the position where the damage occurs is the damage occurrence point.
Technical effects
Compared with the prior art, the invention has the advantages that the concept of the vibration response difference ratio function is utilized, the response of factors such as environment, external load and the like on the undamaged structure is eliminated, the change of the vibration response relation caused by the structural damage can be effectively extracted and quantized, and the accurate detection and positioning of the structural damage are realized. The method has strong engineering practicability, only needs a small amount of vibration measurement work, is low in cost, is simple in implementation process, and greatly improves the adaptability and operability of the vibration response analysis method in the complex structure health detection problem.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a schematic flow diagram of the process of the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a schematic view of a mass-spring discretization system;
FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of the variation of the difference in transfer rate function with the same lesion point;
FIG. 4 is a diagram illustrating the variation of the vibration response difference ratio function along with a damage point.
Detailed Description
As shown in fig. 3, the simulation model of the present embodiment specifically includes: six mass units m 1-m 6, wherein: the sixth mass unit m6 is respectively connected with the third to fifth mass units m 3-m 5 through elastic pieces, the fourth mass unit m4 is respectively connected with the first and third mass units m1 and m3 through elastic pieces, the fifth mass unit m5 is respectively connected with the second and third mass units m2 and m3 through elastic pieces, the third mass unit m3 is respectively connected with the first and second mass units m1 and m2 through elastic pieces, and the first and second mass units m1 and m2 are respectively connected with the ground through elastic pieces.
As shown in fig. 1, the present embodiment includes the following steps:
step one, determining a structural vibration response measuring point: taking the mass-spring discretization system in fig. 2 as an example, assuming that mass elements m2, m3, and m4 are potential damage points and element m5 is selected as a reference point, these four mass elements are vibration response measurement points.
Step two, measuring frequency response function of undamaged structure and overall transfer rateMatrix calculation: measuring frequency response function between vibration response points on undamaged structureUndamaged structure global transmissibility matrix
Step three, measuring a frequency response function of the structure to be measured and calculating a global transfer rate matrix: measuring frequency response function between vibration response points on structure to be measuredGlobal transmissibility matrix for structure under testFrequency response function difference value of structure to be tested and undamaged structure
Step four, calculating a vibration response difference ratio function:
step five, calculating the difference value of the vibration response difference ratio function matrix and the global transmissibility matrix of the undamaged structure:
and (3) the global transmissibility matrix difference value of the structure to be detected and the undamaged structure is as follows:
in the embodiment, the severity of the same damage point is simulated by modifying the mass of the third mass unit m3 exemplarily, the transfer function difference value changes greatly with the change of the mass of the third mass unit m3, and when other mass units are damaged, the transfer function difference also changes greatly.
As shown in fig. 4, when the mass of the third mass unit m3 changes, the vibration response difference ratio function is kept as a constant frequency domain curve and is equal to the undamaged structure transfer rate function applying force at the position where the damage occurs, and the vibration response difference ratio function is different for different mass unit damages, so that the damage position can be effectively identified and located by comparing the difference between the vibration response difference ratio function and the undamaged structure transfer rate function.
Step six, setting the structural damage detection index threshold matrix to be 0.1% of the absolute value of the global transmissivity matrix of the undamaged structure, namely delta is 0.001| TGWhen Δ TG≤0.001|TGIf not, determining that the structure to be detected is not damaged, and otherwise, determining that the structure to be detected is damaged; further calculation ofAnd its vector expansionThe column vector with the smallest modulus represents the place where the damage occurs, and the corresponding subscript is the quality unit of the damage.
When the second mass element m2 is damaged, i.e. the damage is simulated by changing the mass of the second mass element m2, the result in the frequency domain [ 1200 ] Hz is calculated as:
through specific practical experiments, under the condition that the structure is damaged, the operation is carried out according to the above stepsThe method is operated by the following steps, and the obtained experimental data are as follows: delta TGAndcompared with the prior art, the performance index of the method is improved as follows: whether damage occurs or not can be accurately identified, and the position where the damage occurs can be accurately identified.
The foregoing embodiments may be modified in many different ways by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention, which is defined by the appended claims and all changes that come within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are therefore intended to be embraced therein.
Claims (4)
1. A structural damage identification method based on a vibration response difference ratio function is characterized in that after a vibration response measuring point of a structure to be detected is determined, a frequency response function matrix and a global transfer rate matrix of the structure to be detected are calculated according to measured data, and a vibration response difference ratio function and a full transfer rate matrix are obtained through comparison calculation with an undamaged structure, so that structural damage detection and positioning are achieved;
the frequency response function matrix and the global transfer rate matrix of the structure to be detected refer to: calculating to obtain a frequency response function matrix according to all frequency response functions between the potential damage points and the reference pointsWherein:for applying a force F at the undamaged structure S1S1Vibration response at SnThe frequency response function of the two-way filter,global deliveryRate matrix
The step of comparing and calculating the undamaged structure to obtain a vibration response difference ratio function refers to the following steps: calculating according to the frequency response function matrix of the undamaged structure to obtain the difference value of the frequency response functions of the undamaged structure, and further calculating to obtain a vibration response difference ratio function, wherein the calculation specifically comprises the following steps: frequency response function matrix of undamaged structureWherein: hSns1For applying a force F at the undamaged structure S1S1With vibration response X at SnSnFrequency response function between HSnS1=XSn/FS1(ii) a The potential damage points are S1, S2.. Sn, and the reference point is R; difference of frequency response functionVibration response difference ratio function
2. The structural damage identification method of claim 1, wherein the vibration response measuring points comprise potential damage points and reference points, and specifically, the structural parts which are obviously vulnerable are determined as the potential damage points of the system structure and the structural parts which are obviously not easily damaged are determined as the reference points according to the characteristics of the structure, the loading condition, the environmental influence and the historical record information of the structural damage points; and the measured data is measured by an acceleration sensor.
3. The method for identifying structural damage according to claim 1, wherein the structural damage detection and localization is: when in useAll ofIf the absolute values of the elements are smaller than the corresponding elements of the set index threshold matrix, the structure to be detected is considered not to be damaged, otherwise, the structure to be detected is considered to be damaged; when the structure is detected to be damaged, the difference value of the vibration response difference ratio function matrix and the global transmissibility matrix of the undamaged structure is determinedComputing its expansion as a column vector representationThe modulus of the column vector in (b) represents the position where the damage occurs, and the subscript corresponding to the position where the damage occurs is the damage occurrence point.
4. The method of identifying structural damage as claimed in claim 1, wherein said structure under test comprises: six mass units, wherein: the sixth mass unit is respectively connected with the third to fifth mass units through elastic pieces, the fourth mass unit is respectively connected with the first and third mass units through elastic pieces, the fifth mass unit is respectively connected with the second and third mass units through elastic pieces, the third mass unit is respectively connected with the first and second mass units through elastic pieces, and the first and second mass units are respectively connected with the ground through elastic pieces;
the step of determining the vibration response measuring point of the structure to be measured is as follows: and forming a vibration response measuring point by taking the second, third and fourth mass units as potential damage points and the fifth mass unit as a reference point.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201910777483.9A CN110470738B (en) | 2019-08-22 | 2019-08-22 | Structural damage identification method based on vibration response difference ratio function |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201910777483.9A CN110470738B (en) | 2019-08-22 | 2019-08-22 | Structural damage identification method based on vibration response difference ratio function |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN110470738A CN110470738A (en) | 2019-11-19 |
CN110470738B true CN110470738B (en) | 2021-03-30 |
Family
ID=68512700
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN201910777483.9A Active CN110470738B (en) | 2019-08-22 | 2019-08-22 | Structural damage identification method based on vibration response difference ratio function |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN110470738B (en) |
Families Citing this family (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN112710742A (en) * | 2020-12-22 | 2021-04-27 | 中国航空工业集团公司沈阳飞机设计研究所 | Nondestructive testing method for glass damage of aircraft canopy framework |
CN113761470A (en) * | 2021-09-01 | 2021-12-07 | 国家电投集团河南电力有限公司开封发电分公司 | Holographic vibration mode testing method for structural component based on limited reference point |
CN114923650B (en) * | 2022-05-06 | 2024-05-10 | 暨南大学 | Method for quickly identifying structural damage based on vibration mode difference ratio matrix and mode matching |
CN116861544B (en) * | 2023-09-04 | 2024-01-09 | 深圳大学 | Building abnormal vibration source positioning method based on edge cloud cooperation and related equipment |
Citations (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5565618A (en) * | 1995-12-01 | 1996-10-15 | Ford Motor Company | Method to specify sinusoidal vibration tests for product durability validation |
US6412415B1 (en) * | 1999-11-04 | 2002-07-02 | Schlumberger Technology Corp. | Shock and vibration protection for tools containing explosive components |
WO2010034022A1 (en) * | 2008-09-22 | 2010-03-25 | Purdue Research Foundation | Methods and apparatus for diagnosing faults of a vehicle |
CN101718613A (en) * | 2009-11-12 | 2010-06-02 | 东莞华中科技大学制造工程研究院 | Experimental modal analysis method of numerical control equipment |
CN104634870A (en) * | 2014-12-24 | 2015-05-20 | 同济大学 | Tunnel structure damage identification device based on vibration response test |
CN104834805A (en) * | 2015-02-27 | 2015-08-12 | 重庆大学 | Building damage evaluation method based on simplified cantilever beam |
CN107346300A (en) * | 2017-05-27 | 2017-11-14 | 南京航空航天大学 | A kind of Transfer Path Analysis Method of Automobile based on absolute transport function |
CN108563834A (en) * | 2018-03-19 | 2018-09-21 | 上海交通大学 | Analysis method is transmitted in the vibration of automobile exhaust system multipath |
CN109580144A (en) * | 2018-11-19 | 2019-04-05 | 西安交通大学 | It is a kind of that the method for inspection is omitted based on the path OTPA for improving heavy phase dry analysis |
Family Cites Families (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
TWI626111B (en) * | 2016-11-10 | 2018-06-11 | 國立中正大學 | Spindle speed adjusting device in machining and method thereof |
-
2019
- 2019-08-22 CN CN201910777483.9A patent/CN110470738B/en active Active
Patent Citations (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5565618A (en) * | 1995-12-01 | 1996-10-15 | Ford Motor Company | Method to specify sinusoidal vibration tests for product durability validation |
US6412415B1 (en) * | 1999-11-04 | 2002-07-02 | Schlumberger Technology Corp. | Shock and vibration protection for tools containing explosive components |
WO2010034022A1 (en) * | 2008-09-22 | 2010-03-25 | Purdue Research Foundation | Methods and apparatus for diagnosing faults of a vehicle |
CN101718613A (en) * | 2009-11-12 | 2010-06-02 | 东莞华中科技大学制造工程研究院 | Experimental modal analysis method of numerical control equipment |
CN104634870A (en) * | 2014-12-24 | 2015-05-20 | 同济大学 | Tunnel structure damage identification device based on vibration response test |
CN104834805A (en) * | 2015-02-27 | 2015-08-12 | 重庆大学 | Building damage evaluation method based on simplified cantilever beam |
CN107346300A (en) * | 2017-05-27 | 2017-11-14 | 南京航空航天大学 | A kind of Transfer Path Analysis Method of Automobile based on absolute transport function |
CN108563834A (en) * | 2018-03-19 | 2018-09-21 | 上海交通大学 | Analysis method is transmitted in the vibration of automobile exhaust system multipath |
CN109580144A (en) * | 2018-11-19 | 2019-04-05 | 西安交通大学 | It is a kind of that the method for inspection is omitted based on the path OTPA for improving heavy phase dry analysis |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN110470738A (en) | 2019-11-19 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN110470738B (en) | Structural damage identification method based on vibration response difference ratio function | |
Sahin et al. | Quantification and localisation of damage in beam-like structures by using artificial neural networks with experimental validation | |
Li et al. | Sensor fault detection with generalized likelihood ratio and correlation coefficient for bridge SHM | |
CN108573224B (en) | Bridge structure damage positioning method for mobile reconstruction of principal components by using single sensor information | |
Foti | Dynamic identification techniques to numerically detect the structural damage | |
Thöns et al. | On damage detection system information for structural systems | |
An et al. | A degree of dispersion‐based damage localization method | |
US20220018729A1 (en) | Method for monitoring axial loads in structures by identifying natural frequencies | |
Sun et al. | Damage detection based on structural responses induced by traffic load: Methodology and application | |
Li et al. | Bridge damage detection from the equivalent damage load by multitype measurements | |
Ong et al. | Determination of damage severity on rotor shaft due to crack using damage index derived from experimental modal data | |
Shi et al. | Uncertain identification method of structural damage for beam-like structures based on strain modes with noises | |
Monavari et al. | Structural deterioration detection using enhanced autoregressive residuals | |
Cremona | Dynamic monitoring applied to the detection of structural modifications: a high‐speed railway bridge study | |
Lakshmi et al. | Structural damage detection using ARMAX time series models and cepstral distances | |
Liu et al. | A data‐driven combined deterministic‐stochastic subspace identification method for condition assessment of roof structures subjected to strong winds | |
Moustafa et al. | Structural and sensor damage identification using the bond graph approach | |
CN107330264A (en) | A kind of verification method of bridge monitoring data reliability | |
CN105651537A (en) | High-damage-sensitivity truss structure damage real-time monitoring system | |
Mendler et al. | On the probability of localizing damages based on mode shape changes | |
He et al. | Damage detection for continuous bridge based on static‐dynamic condensation and extended Kalman filtering | |
Labuz et al. | Local damage detection in beam-column connections using a dense sensor network | |
Srinivas et al. | Studies on methodological developments in structural damage identification | |
Li et al. | Sensor fault localization with accumulated residual contribution rate for bridge SHM | |
Schallhorn | Localization of vibration-based damage detection method in structural applications |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PB01 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
GR01 | Patent grant |