CN110426059B - An error correction method in measurement considering degrees of freedom - Google Patents
An error correction method in measurement considering degrees of freedom Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN110426059B CN110426059B CN201910461833.0A CN201910461833A CN110426059B CN 110426059 B CN110426059 B CN 110426059B CN 201910461833 A CN201910461833 A CN 201910461833A CN 110426059 B CN110426059 B CN 110426059B
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- freedom
- error
- degrees
- degree
- confidence
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
- 238000012937 correction Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 40
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 33
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 22
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000013507 mapping Methods 0.000 abstract description 2
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000001303 quality assessment method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007812 deficiency Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000006185 dispersion Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01D—MEASURING NOT SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR A SPECIFIC VARIABLE; ARRANGEMENTS FOR MEASURING TWO OR MORE VARIABLES NOT COVERED IN A SINGLE OTHER SUBCLASS; TARIFF METERING APPARATUS; MEASURING OR TESTING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G01D3/00—Indicating or recording apparatus with provision for the special purposes referred to in the subgroups
- G01D3/028—Indicating or recording apparatus with provision for the special purposes referred to in the subgroups mitigating undesired influences, e.g. temperature, pressure
- G01D3/032—Indicating or recording apparatus with provision for the special purposes referred to in the subgroups mitigating undesired influences, e.g. temperature, pressure affecting incoming signal, e.g. by averaging; gating undesired signals
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F17/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
- G06F17/10—Complex mathematical operations
- G06F17/18—Complex mathematical operations for evaluating statistical data, e.g. average values, frequency distributions, probability functions, regression analysis
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
- Mathematical Optimization (AREA)
- Pure & Applied Mathematics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Mathematical Physics (AREA)
- Computational Mathematics (AREA)
- Mathematical Analysis (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Probability & Statistics with Applications (AREA)
- Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
- Algebra (AREA)
- Evolutionary Biology (AREA)
- Databases & Information Systems (AREA)
- Software Systems (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Bioinformatics & Computational Biology (AREA)
- Complex Calculations (AREA)
- Investigating Strength Of Materials By Application Of Mechanical Stress (AREA)
Abstract
Description
技术领域technical field
本发明属于测绘领域,涉及测量结果的置信概率问题,特别是低自由度情况下中误差对应限差的置信概率问题。The invention belongs to the field of surveying and mapping, and relates to the problem of confidence probability of measurement results, in particular to the problem of confidence probability of the error corresponding to the tolerance in the case of low degree of freedom.
背景技术Background technique
测量中,偶然误差的出现是不可避免的,通常认为偶然误差是服从正态分布的随机变量。为了反映误差的离散程度,常用中误差作为衡量精度的指标,来反映观测值的精度高低,通常认为中误差越小,测量成果的精度越高。一般以3倍中误差作为偶然误差的极限值,认为真误差出现在此区间内的概率为99.7%,实践中,也有采用2倍中误差作为极限误差,认为其置信概率为95.4%。这是由于偶然误差服从正态分布,一般地计算正态分布在给定区间上的概率,是将偶然除以标准差转化为标准正态分布进行计算。由于实际观测次数有限,只能求出标准差的估值中误差,因此在测量中以中误差代替标准差,并默认偶然误差除以中误差服从标准正态分布。In measurement, the occurrence of accidental errors is unavoidable, and it is generally considered that accidental errors are random variables that obey a normal distribution. In order to reflect the degree of dispersion of the error, the medium error is often used as an index to measure the accuracy to reflect the accuracy of the observed value. It is generally believed that the smaller the medium error, the higher the accuracy of the measurement results. Generally, 3 times the medium error is used as the limit value of the accidental error, and the probability that the true error appears in this interval is 99.7%. This is because the accidental error obeys a normal distribution. Generally, the probability of a normal distribution in a given interval is calculated by dividing the chance by the standard deviation into a standard normal distribution for calculation. Due to the limited number of actual observations, only the estimated median error of the standard deviation can be obtained, so the median error is used instead of the standard deviation in the measurement, and the default accidental error divided by the median error obeys the standard normal distribution.
实际上,由于中误差的计算与自由度n有关,偶然误差除以中误差并不服从标准正态分布,而是服从t分布。在给定区间上,t分布置信概率的取值随着自由度的增大而增大,当自由度较低时,t分布的置信概率远远低于标准正态分布下的置信概率。因此测量中通常采用增加观测次数,即增大自由度的方法来增大置信概率。然而,由于实际观测次数有限,当观测次数较少时,不同自由度的中误差对应限差的置信概率不同,且均小于置信概率的理论值,即2倍的中误差的置信概率小于95.4%,3倍中误差置信概率小于99.7%。如果以低自由度情况下计算的中误差作为精度衡量指标,将存在以下缺点:In fact, since the calculation of the median error is related to the degree of freedom n, the accidental error divided by the median error does not obey the standard normal distribution, but obeys the t distribution. In a given interval, the value of the confidence probability of the t distribution increases with the increase of the degree of freedom. When the degree of freedom is low, the confidence probability of the t distribution is much lower than that of the standard normal distribution. Therefore, the method of increasing the number of observations, that is, increasing the degree of freedom, is usually used in the measurement to increase the confidence probability. However, due to the limited number of actual observations, when the number of observations is small, the confidence probabilities of the corresponding tolerances of the medium error of different degrees of freedom are different, and all are smaller than the theoretical value of the confidence probability, that is, the confidence probability of the medium error of 2 times is less than 95.4% , the 3-fold error confidence probability is less than 99.7%. If the medium error calculated in the case of low degrees of freedom is used as the accuracy measure, there will be the following disadvantages:
(1)中误差对应限差的置信概率没有在同一水平下,精度的衡量缺乏合理性。(1) The confidence probability of the error corresponding to the tolerance is not at the same level, and the measurement of accuracy lacks rationality.
(2)会降低精度衡量的指标,导致工程建设缺乏可靠性和安全性,不利于工程的验收和质量评定。(2) It will reduce the indicators of precision measurement, resulting in the lack of reliability and safety of engineering construction, which is not conducive to the acceptance and quality assessment of the project.
因此,应该在顾及自由度的情况下对中误差进行修正,保证其对应限差的置信概率在同一水平下,尤其是在低自由度的情况下。但是,目前还没有关于低自由度情况下中误差的修正方法。Therefore, the mid-range error should be corrected in consideration of the degree of freedom to ensure that the confidence probability of its corresponding tolerance is at the same level, especially in the case of low degrees of freedom. However, there is currently no correction method for the medium error in the case of low degrees of freedom.
测量结果的精度评定在我国现代化建设各行各业的测量工作中具有重要的战略意义,目前对测量精度的可靠性要求越来越高。合理的精度评定将有利于提高测量结果的可靠性,保证工程建设的安全性和经济性。The evaluation of the accuracy of the measurement results has important strategic significance in the measurement work of all walks of life in my country's modernization construction. At present, the reliability of the measurement accuracy is increasingly required. Reasonable accuracy evaluation will help to improve the reliability of measurement results and ensure the safety and economy of engineering construction.
发明内容SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
要解决的技术问题:针对现有技术的不足,本发明提出一种顾及自由度的测量中误差修正方法,用于解决低自由度下测量成果精度指标中误差对应限差的置信概率不能达到理论值的问题。Technical problem to be solved: Aiming at the deficiencies of the prior art, the present invention proposes an error correction method in measurement that takes into account the degree of freedom, which is used to solve the problem that the confidence probability of the error corresponding limit in the accuracy index of the measurement result under low degree of freedom cannot reach the theoretical level. value issue.
为解决上述技术问题,本发明采用以下技术方案:In order to solve the above-mentioned technical problems, the present invention adopts the following technical solutions:
一种顾及自由度的测量中误差修正方法,具体包括以下步骤:An error correction method in measurement considering degrees of freedom, which specifically includes the following steps:
步骤一,计算自由度,并计算测量值的中误差;Step 1, calculate the degrees of freedom, and calculate the median error of the measured value;
步骤二,根据自由度大小确定中误差修正系数;Step 2: Determine the medium error correction coefficient according to the degree of freedom;
步骤三,将中误差乘以修正系数,得到修正后中误差。Step 3: Multiply the median error by the correction coefficient to obtain the corrected median error.
作为本发明一种顾及自由度的测量中误差修正方法的进一步优选方案,在步骤一中,中误差的计算公式为其中,V表示改正数,P表示权阵,n为自由度,等于观测次数减去未知数个数。As a further preferred solution of the method for correcting errors in the measurement in consideration of the degree of freedom of the present invention, in step 1, the calculation formula of the intermediate error is: Among them, V represents the correction number, P represents the weight matrix, and n represents the degree of freedom, which is equal to the number of observations minus the number of unknowns.
作为本发明一种顾及自由度的测量中误差修正方法的进一步优选方案,在步骤二中,所述的根据自由度大小确定中误差修正系数包括以下步骤:As a further preferred solution of the method for correcting errors in measurement in consideration of degrees of freedom of the present invention, in step 2, the determining of the correction coefficients for medium errors according to degrees of freedom includes the following steps:
步骤2.1,给定置信概率p;Step 2.1, given the confidence probability p;
步骤2.2,根据置信概率p,利用式(1)计算标准正态分布下的置信上限m;Step 2.2, according to the confidence probability p, use formula (1) to calculate the upper confidence limit m under the standard normal distribution;
根据置信概率P,利用式(2)计算在自由度n下,t分布的置信上限θ;According to the confidence probability P, use formula (2) to calculate the upper confidence limit θ of the t distribution under the degree of freedom n;
其中,Г(x)为伽马函数;Among them, Г(x) is the gamma function;
步骤2.3,计算修正系数:Step 2.3, calculate the correction factor:
k=θ/m (3)。k=θ/m (3).
作为本发明一种顾及自由度的测量中误差修正方法的进一步优选方案,在步骤三中,修正后中误差:As a further preferred solution of the method for correcting errors in measurement in consideration of degrees of freedom of the present invention, in step 3, the errors after correction are:
作为本发明一种顾及自由度的测量中误差修正方法的进一步优选方案,在步骤2.1 中,置信概率p取95.4%或99.7%。As a further preferred solution of the method for correcting errors in measurement in consideration of degrees of freedom of the present invention, in step 2.1, the confidence probability p is 95.4% or 99.7%.
作为本发明一种顾及自由度的测量中误差修正方法的进一步优选方案,在步骤2.2 中,置信上限m和θ可通过查表或计算机计算得出。As a further preferred solution of the method for error correction in measurement considering the degree of freedom of the present invention, in step 2.2, the upper confidence limits m and θ can be obtained through table look-up or computer calculation.
有益效果:Beneficial effects:
本发明在顾及自由度的情况下对测量中误差进行了修正,通过对中误差加入修正系数,确保其对应限差的置信概率达到理论值。一方面,保证了不同自由度下中误差对应限差的置信概率相同,使得精度的衡量在同一置信水平下,保证了精度衡量的合理性。另一方面,提高了低自由度情况下限差的置信概率,保证了测量结果的可靠性,进而有利于保证工程建设的安全性和经济性,方便工程的验收和质量评定。The invention corrects the error in the measurement under the condition of taking into account the degree of freedom, and by adding a correction coefficient to the error in the centering, it is ensured that the confidence probability of the corresponding limit error reaches the theoretical value. On the one hand, it ensures that the confidence probability of the error corresponding to the tolerance is the same under different degrees of freedom, so that the accuracy measurement is at the same confidence level, which ensures the rationality of the accuracy measurement. On the other hand, it improves the confidence probability of the limit error in the case of low degrees of freedom, which ensures the reliability of the measurement results, which in turn helps to ensure the safety and economy of the project construction, and facilitates the acceptance and quality assessment of the project.
附图说明Description of drawings
图1是本发明的方法流程图;Fig. 1 is the method flow chart of the present invention;
图2是本发明水准路线示意图。Figure 2 is a schematic diagram of the leveling route of the present invention.
具体实施方式Detailed ways
以下结合实施例对本发明做具体说明。The present invention will be specifically described below with reference to the embodiments.
一种顾及自由度的测量中误差修正方法,如图1所示,具体包括以下步骤:An error correction method in measurement considering the degree of freedom, as shown in Figure 1, specifically includes the following steps:
步骤一,计算自由度,并利用中误差计算公式计算测量值的中误差;Step 1, calculate the degrees of freedom, and use the middle error calculation formula to calculate the middle error of the measured value;
步骤二,根据自由度大小确定中误差修正系数;Step 2: Determine the medium error correction coefficient according to the degree of freedom;
步骤三,将中误差乘以修正系数,得到修正后中误差。Step 3: Multiply the median error by the correction coefficient to obtain the corrected median error.
优选的,在步骤一中,中误差的计算公式为其中,V表示改正数,P表示权阵,n为自由度,等于观测次数减去未知数个数。Preferably, in step 1, the calculation formula of the middle error is Among them, V represents the correction number, P represents the weight matrix, and n represents the degree of freedom, which is equal to the number of observations minus the number of unknowns.
优选的,在步骤二中,所述的根据自由度大小确定中误差修正系数包括以下步骤:Preferably, in step 2, the determining of the middle error correction coefficient according to the degree of freedom includes the following steps:
步骤2.1,给定置信概率p,对于自由度不大于30的中误差进行修正系数的计算;Step 2.1, given the confidence probability p, calculate the correction coefficient for the medium error with degrees of freedom not greater than 30;
步骤2.2,根据置信概率p,利用式(1)计算标准正态分布下的置信上限m;Step 2.2, according to the confidence probability p, use formula (1) to calculate the upper confidence limit m under the standard normal distribution;
根据置信概率p,利用式(2)计算在自由度n下,t分布的置信上限θ;According to the confidence probability p, use formula (2) to calculate the upper confidence limit θ of the t distribution under the degree of freedom n;
其中,Γ(x)为伽马函数。Among them, Γ(x) is the gamma function.
步骤2.3,计算修正系数:Step 2.3, calculate the correction factor:
k=θ/m (3)k=θ/m (3)
优选的,在步骤三中,中误差的改正值Preferably, in step 3, the correction value of the medium error
优选的,在步骤2.1中,置信概率p一般取95.4%或99.7%。Preferably, in step 2.1, the confidence probability p is generally 95.4% or 99.7%.
优选的,在步骤2.2中,置信上限m和θ可通过查表或计算机计算得出。Preferably, in step 2.2, the upper confidence limits m and θ can be calculated by looking up a table or by a computer.
在水准网中,如图2,A和B是已知高程的水准点、并设这些点已知高程无误差。图中C、D和E点是待定点。A和B点高程、观测高差和相应的水准路线见表1。在95.4%的置信概率下,试求待定点C、D高程平差值的中误差。In the leveling network, as shown in Figure 2, A and B are benchmarks with known elevations, and these points are assumed to have known elevations without error. Points C, D and E in the figure are to be determined. The elevations of points A and B, the observed height difference and the corresponding leveling route are shown in Table 1. Under the confidence probability of 95.4%, try to find the median error of the height adjustment values of the points C and D to be determined.
表1Table 1
该问题中观测次数为7,未知数个数为3,则自由度In this problem, the number of observations is 7 and the number of unknowns is 3, then the degree of freedom
n=7-3=4n=7-3=4
通过测量平差知识可知,改正数Through the knowledge of measurement adjustment, it can be known that the correction number
V=[-0.2 2.9 -4.2 -0.1 -3.9 -0.6 -1.2]T V=[-0.2 2.9 -4.2 -0.1 -3.9 -0.6 -1.2] T
权阵P为单位阵;The power matrix P is the unit matrix;
中误差medium error
给定置信概率p=95.4%;Given a confidence probability p=95.4%;
通过计算机算出,标准正态分布下的置信上限m=2,自由度为4的t分布下的置信上限θ=2.859;Calculated by computer, the upper confidence limit m=2 under the standard normal distribution, and the upper confidence limit θ=2.859 under the t distribution with 4 degrees of freedom;
修正系数k=θ/2=1.429;Correction coefficient k=θ/2=1.429;
在95.4%置信概率下中误差的修正值Corrected value of medium error at 95.4% confidence probability
则在95.4%的置信概率下,修正后中误差为3.1mm,进一步提高了精度的指标,保证了测量的可靠性。Under the confidence probability of 95.4%, the error after correction is 3.1mm, which further improves the accuracy index and ensures the reliability of the measurement.
进一步地,给出步骤二中的自由度为1~30的修正系数。Further, a correction coefficient with degrees of freedom ranging from 1 to 30 in step 2 is given.
给定95.4%置信概率;Given a 95.4% confidence probability;
通过计算机求出给定95.4%置信概率t分布下置信上限θ的具体取值,如表2,其中自由度n=1,2,...,30,取θ的有效数字为小数点后3位。表2所示95.4%置信概率下不同自由度的θ值Calculate the specific value of the upper confidence limit θ under a given 95.4% confidence probability t distribution by computer, as shown in Table 2, where the degrees of freedom are n=1, 2, ..., 30, and the significant figures of θ are 3 decimal places. . Table 2 shows the θ values of different degrees of freedom under 95.4% confidence probability
表2Table 2
求出标准正态分布下,95.4%置信概率的置信上限m=2;Find the upper confidence limit m=2 of the 95.4% confidence probability under the standard normal distribution;
通过表2可以计算出自由度n为1~30所对应的修正系数k=θ/2,如表3,表3表示95.4%置信概率下不同自由度对应的修正系数k的取值,取k的有效数字为小数点后 3位。According to Table 2, the correction coefficient k=θ/2 corresponding to the degree of freedom n from 1 to 30 can be calculated, as shown in Table 3. Table 3 shows the value of the correction coefficient k corresponding to different degrees of freedom under the 95.4% confidence probability, take k The significant figures are 3 decimal places.
表3table 3
本发明给出了低自由度下顾及自由度的测量中误差修正方法,保证修正后中误差对应限差的置信概率能够达到理论值,同时给出了具体的实施方式,并以95.4%置信概率为例给出了自由度为1~30的中误差的修正系数。The invention provides a method for correcting errors in measurement taking into account the degree of freedom under low degrees of freedom, ensuring that the confidence probability of the corresponding limit error of the intermediate errors after the correction can reach the theoretical value, and at the same time, a specific implementation method is given, and the confidence probability is 95.4%. As an example, the correction coefficients for medium errors with degrees of freedom ranging from 1 to 30 are given.
以上所述仅为本发明的较佳实施例,并不用以限制本发明,凡在本发明的精神和原则之内,所作的任何修改、等同替换、改进等,均应包含在本发明的保护范围之内。The above are only preferred embodiments of the present invention and are not intended to limit the present invention. Any modification, equivalent replacement, improvement, etc. made within the spirit and principle of the present invention shall be included in the protection of the present invention. within the range.
Claims (4)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201910461833.0A CN110426059B (en) | 2019-05-30 | 2019-05-30 | An error correction method in measurement considering degrees of freedom |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201910461833.0A CN110426059B (en) | 2019-05-30 | 2019-05-30 | An error correction method in measurement considering degrees of freedom |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN110426059A CN110426059A (en) | 2019-11-08 |
CN110426059B true CN110426059B (en) | 2020-07-24 |
Family
ID=68408443
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN201910461833.0A Active CN110426059B (en) | 2019-05-30 | 2019-05-30 | An error correction method in measurement considering degrees of freedom |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN110426059B (en) |
Families Citing this family (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN111895953A (en) * | 2020-09-03 | 2020-11-06 | 长沙理工大学 | A kind of guardrail column buried depth detection and correction method |
Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
KR20100008886A (en) * | 2008-07-17 | 2010-01-27 | 서울대학교산학협력단 | The method of automatic geometric correction for multi-resolution satellite images using scale invariant feature transform |
CN101799524A (en) * | 2009-07-10 | 2010-08-11 | 中国测绘科学研究院 | Method for autonomously monitoring receiver integrity of global navigation satellite system |
CN103148813A (en) * | 2013-01-31 | 2013-06-12 | 湖南致力地质资源环境工程科技有限公司 | Method for processing global position system (GPS) deformation monitoring data |
CN104849728A (en) * | 2015-05-12 | 2015-08-19 | 北京航空航天大学 | Integrity assessment method of ground base strengthening system |
CN104931160A (en) * | 2015-06-26 | 2015-09-23 | 中国科学院重庆绿色智能技术研究院 | Six-dimensional force sensor decoupling and error calculation method |
CN105867115A (en) * | 2016-04-26 | 2016-08-17 | 中国工程物理研究院总体工程研究所 | Method for controlling non-stationary random vibration test |
-
2019
- 2019-05-30 CN CN201910461833.0A patent/CN110426059B/en active Active
Patent Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
KR20100008886A (en) * | 2008-07-17 | 2010-01-27 | 서울대학교산학협력단 | The method of automatic geometric correction for multi-resolution satellite images using scale invariant feature transform |
CN101799524A (en) * | 2009-07-10 | 2010-08-11 | 中国测绘科学研究院 | Method for autonomously monitoring receiver integrity of global navigation satellite system |
CN103148813A (en) * | 2013-01-31 | 2013-06-12 | 湖南致力地质资源环境工程科技有限公司 | Method for processing global position system (GPS) deformation monitoring data |
CN104849728A (en) * | 2015-05-12 | 2015-08-19 | 北京航空航天大学 | Integrity assessment method of ground base strengthening system |
CN104931160A (en) * | 2015-06-26 | 2015-09-23 | 中国科学院重庆绿色智能技术研究院 | Six-dimensional force sensor decoupling and error calculation method |
CN105867115A (en) * | 2016-04-26 | 2016-08-17 | 中国工程物理研究院总体工程研究所 | Method for controlling non-stationary random vibration test |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN110426059A (en) | 2019-11-08 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN203241127U (en) | Electronic scale with temperature auto-compensation, and calibration system | |
CN110849459B (en) | Creep deformation correction method for weighing sensor | |
CN110426059B (en) | An error correction method in measurement considering degrees of freedom | |
WO2019165743A1 (en) | Method, device and system for determining angle-to-wind deviation and correcting angle-to-wind | |
CN106053724A (en) | Cloud computing-based gas sensor precision compensating method and device | |
WO2020024872A1 (en) | Weighing-based goods quantity calculation method | |
WO2021018160A1 (en) | Hysteresis compensation method for a weighing device | |
WO2019019353A1 (en) | Method for correcting draft value of ship | |
CN105258779A (en) | Automatic calibration method of electronic scale | |
WO2023010790A1 (en) | Measurement correction method and apparatus for sensor, and server power supply | |
CN108731768A (en) | A kind of liquid level sensor data correcting method in aircraft portrait center of gravity regulating system | |
CN111339615A (en) | Aircraft fuel tank gravity center calculation and compensation method based on two-step interpolation | |
CN104457853A (en) | Temperature and humidity measuring meter with correcting function and method for correcting temperature and humidity measuring data | |
CN105606071A (en) | Atmospheric pressure altimeter based on GPS positioning and temperature correcting and correcting method | |
CN112649077B (en) | Flow point automatic calibration method, device, equipment and storage medium | |
CN108802153B (en) | Calibration method for period fading, electronic device and storage medium | |
CN110260832A (en) | A kind of crane amplitude measurement method | |
CN105094439B (en) | The acceleration transducer calibration of touch panel device, Dip countion method and device | |
CN112945266A (en) | Laser navigation robot and odometer calibration method thereof | |
CN113569202B (en) | Calculation Method of Uncertainty of River Flow Full-Scale Measurement Corrected by Unified Benchmark | |
CN112697171B (en) | Leveling angle testing method and system | |
CN217358734U (en) | Device for compensating all-round tilting weighing error of electronic scale | |
WO2024138364A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for estimating slope on basis of weight distribution change of vehicle, electronic device, computer-readable medium, and vehicle | |
CN110470925A (en) | A kind of electrical drive power assembly reliability test method based on extension dependent function | |
JPS6143243Y2 (en) |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PB01 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
GR01 | Patent grant |