CN110414821A - A kind of cured tobacco leaf quality overall evaluation method based on safety indexes - Google Patents
A kind of cured tobacco leaf quality overall evaluation method based on safety indexes Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN110414821A CN110414821A CN201910658923.9A CN201910658923A CN110414821A CN 110414821 A CN110414821 A CN 110414821A CN 201910658923 A CN201910658923 A CN 201910658923A CN 110414821 A CN110414821 A CN 110414821A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- score
- quality
- evaluation
- index
- safety
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 241000208125 Nicotiana Species 0.000 title claims abstract description 54
- 235000002637 Nicotiana tabacum Nutrition 0.000 title claims abstract description 54
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 50
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 22
- 230000001953 sensory effect Effects 0.000 claims description 19
- IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N Atomic nitrogen Chemical compound N#N IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 16
- 238000013441 quality evaluation Methods 0.000 claims description 15
- 229910052757 nitrogen Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 8
- 229910001385 heavy metal Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 7
- 239000003795 chemical substances by application Substances 0.000 claims description 6
- 239000002917 insecticide Substances 0.000 claims description 6
- 239000003513 alkali Substances 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 239000007789 gas Substances 0.000 claims description 5
- 230000007794 irritation Effects 0.000 claims description 5
- 239000002304 perfume Substances 0.000 claims description 5
- 230000035807 sensation Effects 0.000 claims description 5
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 5
- ZLMJMSJWJFRBEC-UHFFFAOYSA-N Potassium Chemical compound [K] ZLMJMSJWJFRBEC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 4
- 229920002472 Starch Polymers 0.000 claims description 4
- NMLQNVRHVSWEGS-UHFFFAOYSA-N [Cl].[K] Chemical compound [Cl].[K] NMLQNVRHVSWEGS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 4
- 239000002585 base Substances 0.000 claims description 4
- 239000000152 carbamate pesticide Substances 0.000 claims description 4
- 230000000855 fungicidal effect Effects 0.000 claims description 4
- 239000000417 fungicide Substances 0.000 claims description 4
- 239000003986 organophosphate insecticide Substances 0.000 claims description 4
- 229910052700 potassium Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 4
- 239000011591 potassium Substances 0.000 claims description 4
- 239000002728 pyrethroid Substances 0.000 claims description 4
- 239000008107 starch Substances 0.000 claims description 4
- 235000019698 starch Nutrition 0.000 claims description 4
- 239000004009 herbicide Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000003992 organochlorine insecticide Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 241000196324 Embryophyta Species 0.000 claims 1
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 abstract description 2
- 235000019504 cigarettes Nutrition 0.000 description 4
- 239000000447 pesticide residue Substances 0.000 description 4
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 3
- ZAMOUSCENKQFHK-UHFFFAOYSA-N Chlorine atom Chemical compound [Cl] ZAMOUSCENKQFHK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- CDBYLPFSWZWCQE-UHFFFAOYSA-L Sodium Carbonate Chemical compound [Na+].[Na+].[O-]C([O-])=O CDBYLPFSWZWCQE-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 2
- 239000000460 chlorine Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229910052801 chlorine Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000002994 raw material Substances 0.000 description 2
- 235000013311 vegetables Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 238000009333 weeding Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000005906 Imidacloprid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229930013930 alkaloid Natural products 0.000 description 1
- 150000003797 alkaloid derivatives Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 235000009508 confectionery Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 1
- YWTYJOPNNQFBPC-UHFFFAOYSA-N imidacloprid Chemical compound [O-][N+](=O)\N=C1/NCCN1CC1=CC=C(Cl)N=C1 YWTYJOPNNQFBPC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229940056881 imidacloprid Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 150000002466 imines Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 1
- QSHDDOUJBYECFT-UHFFFAOYSA-N mercury Chemical compound [Hg] QSHDDOUJBYECFT-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229910052753 mercury Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 229910052751 metal Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 description 1
- -1 nicotinoyl Chemical group 0.000 description 1
- 230000001737 promoting effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001303 quality assessment method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012216 screening Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000013589 supplement Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000019505 tobacco product Nutrition 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
- G06Q10/06393—Score-carding, benchmarking or key performance indicator [KPI] analysis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
- G06Q10/06395—Quality analysis or management
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Educational Administration (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Manufacture Of Tobacco Products (AREA)
Abstract
The cured tobacco leaf quality overall evaluation method based on safety indexes that the invention discloses a kind of, cured tobacco leaf quality overall evaluation total score=presentation quality score × 10%+ physical characteristic score × 10%+ chemical component score × 20%+ aesthetic quality score × 40%+ safety score × 20%.The beneficial effects of the invention are as follows can accurately evaluate quality of tobacco.
Description
Technical field
The invention belongs to tobacco quality assessment technique fields, and it is comprehensive to be related to a kind of cured tobacco leaf quality based on safety indexes
Close evaluation method.
Background technique
Cured tobacco leaf quality is a kind of comprehensive concept for showing tobacco leaf superiority and inferiority, is with different times, different zones, no
The lever scale constantly adjusted with the consumer group.Current quality of tobacco evaluation is all made of four parts, including appearance matter
Amount, physical characteristic, chemical component and sensory evaluation.Good tobacco leaf raw material is in addition to perfect presentation quality, perfect object
It manages other than characteristic, the chemical component of coordination and comfortable aesthetic quality, should also have the qualitative character of green non-pollution, that is,
The Pesticide Residue index and heavy metal limit index usually mentioned.At present in quality of tobacco evaluation, pesticide residue and again
Metal only exists in the form of limit index, and with other quality of tobacco evaluation indexes substantially without correlation, while its content is high
It is low with whole quality evaluation also without corresponding evaluation method, this is also that cured tobacco leaf quality evaluation is not suitable for cigarette enterprise
The main problem of raw tobacco material system.
Summary of the invention
The purpose of the present invention is to provide a kind of cured tobacco leaf quality overall evaluation method based on safety indexes, this hair
Technical solution used by bright is:
Presentation quality score=∑ (a-th of Evaluation on Appearance Quality index score × a-th of Evaluation on Appearance Quality index power
Weight), a=color, maturity, blade construction, identity, oil, coloration；
Physical characteristic score=∑ (b-th of physical characteristic evaluation index score × b-th of physical characteristic evaluation index power
Weight), b=thickness, pulling force, Filling power, rate containing stalk, equilibrium water conten, surface density；
Chemical component score=∑ (c-th of chemical component index score × c-th of chemical component index weights), c=is total
Vegetable soda, total nitrogen, reduced sugar, potassium, starch, sugared alkali ratio, nitrogen base ratio, potassium chlorine ratio；
Sensory evaluation score=∑ (d-th of tobacco sensory quality evaluation index score × d-th of tobacco sensory quality evaluation
Index weights), d=aroma quality, perfume quantity, miscellaneous gas, pleasant impression, irritation, soft degree, fine and smooth degree, mellow and full sense, dry sensation；
Safety score=∑ (e-th of safety specific targets score of ∑ × e-th of safety indexes weight), e=has
Machine chlorine insecticide, organophosphorus insecticide, carbamate pesticide, pyrethroid insectide, nicotimine insecticide, weeding
Agent, fungicide, Suckering agents, heavy metal；
Cured tobacco leaf quality overall evaluation total score=presentation quality score × 10%+ physical characteristic score × 10%+ chemistry
Component score × 20%+ aesthetic quality score × 40%+ safety score × 20%.
The beneficial effects of the invention are as follows can accurately evaluate quality of tobacco.
Specific embodiment
The present invention is described in detail With reference to embodiment.
It is quasi- that 1 presentation quality assigns minute mark
Select that color, maturity, blade construction, identity, oil, coloration 6 as tobacco leaf Evaluation on Appearance Quality index.Table
1 is Evaluation on Appearance Quality index weights, and table 2 is Evaluation on Appearance Quality index score.
1 Evaluation on Appearance Quality index weights of table
| Index | Color | Maturity | Blade construction | Identity | Oil | Coloration |
| Weight | 0.15 | 0.20 | 0.15 | 0.10 | 0.25 | 0.15 |
2 Evaluation on Appearance Quality index score of table
It is quasi- that 2 physical characteristics assign minute mark
Tobacco leaf physical characteristic not only reacts quality of tobacco feature, while also reacting the resist processing of tobacco leaf and tobacco leaf uses
Economic characters.According to the correlation of tobacco leaf physical features and tobacco sensory quality and production of cigarettes, selects thickness, pulling force, fills out
It supplements with money, rate containing stalk, surface density and equilibrium water conten 6 are used as tobacco leaf physical characteristic evaluation indexes.Table 3 is that physical characteristic evaluation refers to
Weight is marked, table 4 is physical characteristic evaluation index score.
3 physical characteristic evaluation criterion weight of table
| Index | Thickness | Pulling force | Filling power | Rate containing stalk | Equilibrium water conten | Surface density |
| Weight | 0.15 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.20 | 0.10 | 0.05 |
4 physical characteristic evaluation index score of table
Note: by taking following sample as an example, thickness 0.084mm, score 100, pulling force 1.42N, score 86, and so on.
It is quasi- that 3 chemical components assign minute mark
Select tobacco leaf total nitrogen, reduced sugar, total alkaloid, potassium, candy alkali ratio, nitrogen base ratio, 8 potassium chlorine ratio, starch masters
Based on wanting chemical component index, tobacco leaf chemical composition evaluation is carried out.Table 5 is chemical component index weights, and table 6 is chemical component
Index score.
5 chemical component index weights of table
6 chemical component index score of table
It is quasi- that minute mark is assigned in 4 sensory evaluations
Select aroma quality, perfume quantity, miscellaneous gas, pleasant impression, irritation, soft degree, fine and smooth degree, mellow and full sense, dry sensation 9
Index is as tobacco sensory quality evaluation index.Table 7 is tobacco sensory quality evaluation criterion weight, and table 8 is tobacco sensory quality
Evaluation index score.
7 tobacco sensory quality evaluation criterion weight of table
| Index | Aroma quality | Perfume quantity | Miscellaneous gas | Pleasant impression | Irritation | Soft degree | Fine and smooth degree | Mellow and full sense | Dry sensation |
| Weight | 0.24 | 0.24 | 0.12 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 |
8 tobacco sensory quality evaluation index score of table
It is quasi- that 5 pesticide residues and heavy metal assign minute mark
Select organochlorine insecticide, organophosphorus insecticide, carbamate pesticide, pyrethroid insectide, nicotinoyl
As safety indexes, table 9 is safety indexes weight, table 10 for imines Insecticides (tech) & Herbicides (tech), fungicide, Suckering agents, heavy metal
For safety indexes score.
9 safety indexes weight of table
10 safety specific targets score (content unit: mg/kg) of table
Note: pesticide residue and heavy metal are deduction item, such as imidacloprid 2.10mg/kg, score -4.20, mercury N.D. (are not examined
Out), score 0, and so on.
6 cured tobacco leaf quality overall evaluation score formula
Presentation quality score=∑ (a-th of Evaluation on Appearance Quality index score × a-th of Evaluation on Appearance Quality index power
Weight) (a=color, maturity, blade construction, identity, oil, coloration)
Physical characteristic score=∑ (b-th of physical characteristic evaluation index score × b-th of physical characteristic evaluation index power
Weight) (b=thickness, pulling force, Filling power, rate containing stalk, equilibrium water conten, surface density)
(c=is total for chemical component score=∑ (c-th of chemical component index score × c-th of chemical component index weights)
Vegetable soda, total nitrogen, reduced sugar, potassium, starch, sugared alkali ratio, nitrogen base ratio, potassium chlorine ratio)
Sensory evaluation score=∑ (d-th of tobacco sensory quality evaluation index score × d-th of tobacco sensory quality evaluation
Index weights) (d=aroma quality, perfume quantity, miscellaneous gas, pleasant impression, irritation, soft degree, fine and smooth degree, mellow and full sense, dry sensation)
(e=has safety score=∑ (e-th of safety specific targets score of ∑ × e-th of safety indexes weight)
Machine chlorine insecticide, organophosphorus insecticide, carbamate pesticide, pyrethroid insectide, nicotimine insecticide, weeding
Agent, fungicide, Suckering agents, heavy metal)
Cured tobacco leaf quality overall evaluation total score=presentation quality score × 10%+ physical characteristic score × 10%+ chemistry
Component score × 20%+ aesthetic quality score × 40%+ safety score × 20%.
Advantage of the present invention also resides in:
1. cured tobacco leaf quality overall evaluation method contain presentation quality, physical characteristic, chemical component, sensory evaluation and
Safety, it is more complete and scientific compared to previous quality of tobacco evaluation method, it is the tobacco leaf matter with effective and objectivity
Comprehensive quality evaluation system.
2. presentation quality, physical characteristic, chemical component, sensory evaluation and safety, the screening of specific evaluation index with
And corresponding weight and to assign minute mark quasi-, it is to obtain after summarized materials document and expert opinion, it is former to carry out tobacco leaf to cigarette enterprise
Material evaluation has good directive function.
3. the weight and corresponding minute mark of assigning by rationalizing are quasi-, it can be applied in software development, realize quality of tobacco
The actual effect of evaluation has the advantages that simple, practical, accurate, strong operability, effectively to evaluate cured tobacco leaf raw material matter
Amount promotes tobacco product stable development to establish solid foundation.
4. incorporating safety indexes in cured tobacco leaf quality evaluation, the sky in current quality of tobacco appraisement system has been filled up
It is white, the defect of conventional quality of tobacco appraisement system is compensated for, in tobacco leaf planting producing region, Cigarette processing enterprise and tobacco scientific research institutions
Multiple fields all there is great promotional value.
The above is only not to make limit in any form to the present invention to better embodiment of the invention
System, any simple modification that embodiment of above is made according to the technical essence of the invention, equivalent variations and modification,
Belong in the range of technical solution of the present invention.
Claims (1)
1. a kind of cured tobacco leaf quality overall evaluation method based on safety indexes, it is characterised in that:
Presentation quality score=∑ (a-th of Evaluation on Appearance Quality index score × a-th of Evaluation on Appearance Quality index weights), a
=color, maturity, blade construction, identity, oil, coloration；
Physical characteristic score=∑ (b-th of physical characteristic evaluation index score × b-th of physical characteristic evaluation criterion weight), b
=thickness, pulling force, Filling power, rate containing stalk, equilibrium water conten, surface density；
Chemical component score=∑ (c-th of chemical component index score × c-th of chemical component index weights), the total plant of c=
Alkali, total nitrogen, reduced sugar, potassium, starch, sugared alkali ratio, nitrogen base ratio, potassium chlorine ratio；
Sensory evaluation score=∑ (d-th of tobacco sensory quality evaluation index score × d-th of tobacco sensory quality evaluation index
Weight), d=aroma quality, perfume quantity, miscellaneous gas, pleasant impression, irritation, soft degree, fine and smooth degree, mellow and full sense, dry sensation；
Safety score=∑ (e-th of safety specific targets score of ∑ × e-th of safety indexes weight), e=organochlorine
Insecticide, organophosphorus insecticide, carbamate pesticide, pyrethroid insectide, nicotimine Insecticides (tech) & Herbicides (tech),
Fungicide, Suckering agents, heavy metal；
Cured tobacco leaf quality overall evaluation total score=presentation quality score × 10%+ physical characteristic score × 10%+ chemical component
Score × 20%+ aesthetic quality score × 40%+ safety score × 20%.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201910658923.9A CN110414821A (en) | 2019-07-22 | 2019-07-22 | A kind of cured tobacco leaf quality overall evaluation method based on safety indexes |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201910658923.9A CN110414821A (en) | 2019-07-22 | 2019-07-22 | A kind of cured tobacco leaf quality overall evaluation method based on safety indexes |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN110414821A true CN110414821A (en) | 2019-11-05 |
Family
ID=68362280
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201910658923.9A Pending CN110414821A (en) | 2019-07-22 | 2019-07-22 | A kind of cured tobacco leaf quality overall evaluation method based on safety indexes |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN110414821A (en) |
Cited By (7)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN111257512A (en) * | 2020-02-11 | 2020-06-09 | 中国农业科学院烟草研究所 | Flue-cured tobacco smoke safety detection method, system, storage medium and computer program |
| CN111311088A (en) * | 2020-02-11 | 2020-06-19 | 中国农业科学院烟草研究所 | Flue-cured tobacco aroma style characteristic detection method, system, storage medium and program |
| CN111707785A (en) * | 2020-06-10 | 2020-09-25 | 河南中烟工业有限责任公司 | Method for improving quality of large-depth thick sheet type tobacco leaves |
| CN112485372A (en) * | 2020-11-17 | 2021-03-12 | 中国烟草总公司郑州烟草研究院 | Method for evaluating miscellaneous gas in flue gas |
| CN113240300A (en) * | 2021-05-20 | 2021-08-10 | 江苏中烟工业有限责任公司 | Method for screening varieties of imported tobacco leaves |
| CN113945563A (en) * | 2021-10-19 | 2022-01-18 | 中国烟草总公司湖北省公司 | Method for evaluating quality uniformity of cigar wrapper tobacco leaves |
| CN114166632A (en) * | 2021-12-07 | 2022-03-11 | 四川省烟草公司达州市公司 | Method for evaluating physical characteristics of cigar coat and cigar core of cigar tobacco |
Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN103424542A (en) * | 2013-08-23 | 2013-12-04 | 贵州省烟草科学研究院 | Tobacco leaf quality evaluation method based on sensory evaluation |
| CN104698143A (en) * | 2015-04-02 | 2015-06-10 | 中国烟草总公司贵州省公司 | Tobacco quality qualitative and quantitative comprehensive evaluation method |
| CN107862456A (en) * | 2017-11-02 | 2018-03-30 | 江苏中烟工业有限责任公司 | A kind of method of batch quality of tobacco overall merit |
-
2019
- 2019-07-22 CN CN201910658923.9A patent/CN110414821A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN103424542A (en) * | 2013-08-23 | 2013-12-04 | 贵州省烟草科学研究院 | Tobacco leaf quality evaluation method based on sensory evaluation |
| CN104698143A (en) * | 2015-04-02 | 2015-06-10 | 中国烟草总公司贵州省公司 | Tobacco quality qualitative and quantitative comprehensive evaluation method |
| CN107862456A (en) * | 2017-11-02 | 2018-03-30 | 江苏中烟工业有限责任公司 | A kind of method of batch quality of tobacco overall merit |
Non-Patent Citations (3)
| Title |
|---|
| 张振平: "优质烤烟区划理论与实践", vol. 978, 陕西科学技术出版社, pages: 191 * |
| 杨洋;杨雨波;许洪庆;张兴国;夏志林;余大春;吴有祥;欧明毅;: "遵义市不同植烟区的烟叶综合质量差异", vol. 46, no. 08, pages 1 - 3 * |
| 闫克玉;王光耀;李春松;: "我国烤烟质量分析评价研究进展", no. 1 * |
Cited By (9)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN111257512A (en) * | 2020-02-11 | 2020-06-09 | 中国农业科学院烟草研究所 | Flue-cured tobacco smoke safety detection method, system, storage medium and computer program |
| CN111311088A (en) * | 2020-02-11 | 2020-06-19 | 中国农业科学院烟草研究所 | Flue-cured tobacco aroma style characteristic detection method, system, storage medium and program |
| LU102506A1 (en) * | 2020-02-11 | 2021-08-02 | Tobacco Res Inst Caas | A method, system, storage medium and program for detecting the flavor style characteristics of smoke hardened tobacco |
| CN111707785A (en) * | 2020-06-10 | 2020-09-25 | 河南中烟工业有限责任公司 | Method for improving quality of large-depth thick sheet type tobacco leaves |
| CN111707785B (en) * | 2020-06-10 | 2023-11-21 | 河南中烟工业有限责任公司 | Method for improving quality of large and deep sheet tobacco leaves |
| CN112485372A (en) * | 2020-11-17 | 2021-03-12 | 中国烟草总公司郑州烟草研究院 | Method for evaluating miscellaneous gas in flue gas |
| CN113240300A (en) * | 2021-05-20 | 2021-08-10 | 江苏中烟工业有限责任公司 | Method for screening varieties of imported tobacco leaves |
| CN113945563A (en) * | 2021-10-19 | 2022-01-18 | 中国烟草总公司湖北省公司 | Method for evaluating quality uniformity of cigar wrapper tobacco leaves |
| CN114166632A (en) * | 2021-12-07 | 2022-03-11 | 四川省烟草公司达州市公司 | Method for evaluating physical characteristics of cigar coat and cigar core of cigar tobacco |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN110414821A (en) | A kind of cured tobacco leaf quality overall evaluation method based on safety indexes | |
| Carbonell‐Barrachina et al. | Quality attributes of pistachio nuts as affected by rootstock and deficit irrigation | |
| Derksen et al. | Impact of post‐emergence herbicides on weed community diversity within conservation‐tillage systems | |
| Kien et al. | Impacts of trade liberalization on employment in Vietnam: a system generalized method of moments estimation | |
| Söderberg et al. | Structure and activity of the bacterial community in the rhizosphere of different plant species and the effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal colonisation | |
| CN105419944B (en) | A kind of vanilla chocolate essence and its application in cigarette | |
| Cuartas‐Domínguez et al. | Pollinator‐mediated selection and experimental manipulation of the flower phenotype in Chloraea bletioides | |
| Mahecha-Vásquez et al. | Diversity indices using arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi to evaluate the soil state in banana crops in Colombia | |
| Arbache et al. | Unions and interindustry wage differentials | |
| CN104194937A (en) | Mango essence | |
| Mohan et al. | Characterization of popular bread wheat cultivars of India for grain quality and the stable genetic resource | |
| Samaniego et al. | Effect of the growing area on the fat content and the fatty acid composition of Ecuadorian cocoa beans | |
| Souza et al. | Selection of experimental strawberry clones for fruit appearance attributes | |
| CN102283436B (en) | Cigarette tobacco leaf composition without additive and high-grade cigarette products prepared from composition | |
| Frankin et al. | New flavors from old wheats: exploring the aroma profiles and sensory attributes of local Mediterranean wheat landraces | |
| Abid et al. | Double exponential forecasting model for dates production in Pakistan | |
| Shah et al. | Development and sensory evaluation of Kheer prepared from little millet (Kutki), milk and honey from Melghat | |
| Cavalcanti | Income distributive effects in the Brazilian economy | |
| Yousefi | Comparison of morphological and chemical properties of wild pistachio (Pistacia atlantica) fruit across two habitats in Kurdistan Province. | |
| Gadotti et al. | Fungal and seed treatment interference in the viability of coriander seeds | |
| Dagne Tafa et al. | Effect of bacterial wilt disease, blanching and growing environment on potato varieties (Solanum tuberosum L.) and processing quality of potato chips. | |
| Pratama et al. | Quality evaluation in development of 3D printed chocolate products | |
| Muchdie et al. | Technology Contribution to the Indonesian Regional Economy. | |
| Gowthami et al. | ADOPTION BEHAVIOUR OF BRINJAL GROWERS TOWARDS INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES IN EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT OF ANDHRA PRADESH | |
| Serrano‐Megías et al. | Optimization of tropical juice composition for the Spanish market |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |
Application publication date: 20191105 |
|
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |