CN110213135A - A kind of fire wall performance test method and device - Google Patents
A kind of fire wall performance test method and device Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN110213135A CN110213135A CN201910506672.2A CN201910506672A CN110213135A CN 110213135 A CN110213135 A CN 110213135A CN 201910506672 A CN201910506672 A CN 201910506672A CN 110213135 A CN110213135 A CN 110213135A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- test
- firewall
- testing
- packet loss
- delay
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L43/00—Arrangements for monitoring or testing data switching networks
- H04L43/06—Generation of reports
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L43/00—Arrangements for monitoring or testing data switching networks
- H04L43/08—Monitoring or testing based on specific metrics, e.g. QoS, energy consumption or environmental parameters
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L43/00—Arrangements for monitoring or testing data switching networks
- H04L43/08—Monitoring or testing based on specific metrics, e.g. QoS, energy consumption or environmental parameters
- H04L43/0823—Errors, e.g. transmission errors
- H04L43/0829—Packet loss
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L43/00—Arrangements for monitoring or testing data switching networks
- H04L43/08—Monitoring or testing based on specific metrics, e.g. QoS, energy consumption or environmental parameters
- H04L43/0852—Delays
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L43/00—Arrangements for monitoring or testing data switching networks
- H04L43/08—Monitoring or testing based on specific metrics, e.g. QoS, energy consumption or environmental parameters
- H04L43/0876—Network utilisation, e.g. volume of load or congestion level
- H04L43/0888—Throughput
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L43/00—Arrangements for monitoring or testing data switching networks
- H04L43/50—Testing arrangements
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L63/00—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security
- H04L63/02—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for separating internal from external traffic, e.g. firewalls
Abstract
The present invention relates to firewall technology field, especially a kind of fire wall performance test method, include the following steps: to establish test philosophy: the content that Firewall testing criterion includes is more, but is mainly reflected in the formation of Firewall testing specification；Build test environment: building for Firewall testing environment should be able to meet the needs of various network applications；It determines test item: the test item to be carried out is determined according to the positioning for the firewall product tested；Performance test: wherein handling capacity, time delay, packet loss, system recovery time and back-to-back buffering test belong to the component part in performance test, include the following steps: testing throughput again in performance test: obtaining the data on flows of the firewall in target network environment.The present invention takes turns doing testing throughput, delay testing, packet loss test, system recovery time test and back-to-back buffering test to firewall by tester, more accurately can make accurate test and evaluation report to the performance of firewall.
Description
Technical field
The present invention relates to firewall technology field more particularly to a kind of fire wall performance test method and devices.
Background technique
Firewall is also referred to as protecting wall, and firewall is the barrier between internally positioned net and extranets, it is according to system administration
The rule that member pre-defines carrys out the disengaging of control data bag.Firewall is the first line of defence of system, effect be prevent it is non-
The entrance of method user.When firewall installation, performance test can be done to firewall, but performance is done to firewall at present
Test is most relatively simple, and majority only does the test of handling capacity, comprehensively cannot do performance test to firewall, it is therefore desirable to one
Kind fire wall performance test method and device carry out meet demand.
Summary of the invention
The purpose of the present invention is to solve disadvantages existing in the prior art, and a kind of fire wall performance test proposed
Method and device.
To achieve the goals above, present invention employs following technical solutions:
A kind of fire wall performance test method is designed, is included the following steps:
S1, establish test philosophy: the content that Firewall testing criterion includes is more, but is mainly reflected in Firewall testing rule
In the formation of model；
S2, build test environment: building for Firewall testing environment should be able to meet the needs of various network applications；
S3, it determines test item: the test item to be carried out is determined according to the positioning for the firewall product tested；
S4, performance test: wherein handling capacity, time delay, packet loss, system recovery time and back-to-back buffering test belong to
Component part in performance test includes the following steps: again in performance test
A1, testing throughput: the data on flows of the firewall in target network environment is obtained, data on flows includes firewall
Reception amount and traffic volume, i.e. the handling capacity of firewall, testing throughput select RFC protos test suite PROTOS corresponding to tester come into
Row test, tester can be tested using two points of iterative methods, and tester can be given out a contract for a project using 100% flow first, then be used
The quantity that tester receives the quantity of packet and gives out a contract for a project compares, if it find that packet loss, then can use 50% ((100%+0)/2)
Flow is tested, if it find that can be tested using the flow of 75% ((50%+100%)/2) without packet loss, pass through this
The test final test of two points of iteration of kind goes out the maximum throughput data of equipment, and the standard time tested every time is 2 minutes, each
The long test that usually will do it 10-30 standard time of packet；
A2, delay testing: delay testing selects RFC protos test suite PROTOS corresponding to tester to be tested, and delay testing is
The test carried out on the basis of testing handling capacity is established, it is big to need first to measure the long handling capacity of each packet before delay testing
It is small, it is tested using 95% or 90% of maximum throughput, test result includes maximum delay, minimal time delay, mean time
Prolong, it is only necessary to record average delay, delay testing duration is the flow for being arranged 2 minutes, and test repeatedly, then takes
Average value is final result；
A3, packet loss test: packet loss test selects RFC protos test suite PROTOS corresponding to tester to be tested, packet loss
Test method is to test the packet drop of system under test (SUT) respectively using the flow of 10%-100%, when the feelings that test 100% loads
When condition, for firewall, packet loss=100%- handling capacity；
A4, system recovery time test: passing through DUT using the flow that tester sends constant rate of speed, and DUT is reset,
Power operation is either carried out, until flow restores normal, recovery time is equal to the ratio of packet loss quantity and packet sending speed；
A5, back-to-back buffering test: tester sends the data packet of certain flow size to firewall, and sending time is usual
It is 1-2 seconds, then sees that receiving end can receive how many data packets, usual firewall leans against buffer capacity and handling capacity
PPS is consistent；
S5, the performance assessment report for obtaining firewall: the data that will be measured in the small step of each of above-mentioned S4
It records, synthesis is analyzed, and then can make the performance assessment report to firewall.
Preferably, in step sl, in establishing test philosophy, " the Firewall testing specification " of the second edition is that firewall is surveyed
The main foundation in content that examination criterion includes.
Preferably, in step s3, test item mainly has application proxy test, Telnet agency test, VPN function to survey
Examination, flow control test, firewall management test, security test and performance test.
Preferably, in step A1, whether there is packet loss since tester can be severe in judgment, even if there is a packet not receive
It arrives, still can be with two points of iterative methods toward decline, but this packet loss may not be that equipment causes, therefore in this case, surveys
The influence that examination instrument all can avoid other reasons from causing packet loss to test result by one appropriate numerical value of setting.
Preferably, in step A2, use the 90%-100% of the handling capacity result of each packet length as the stream of delay testing
Size is measured, the test request of general time delay there can not be any packet loss, because if packet loss, it is very big to will cause time delay, meeting
Cause the inaccuracy of result.
The present invention also provides a kind of fire wall performance test device, including tester shell, in the tester shell
Portion is fixed with central processing module, and the central processing module is connected separately with testing throughput module, time delay by conducting wire
Test module, packet loss test module, system recovery time test module, back-to-back buffering test module, display screen and switch
Key, the testing throughput module are connected with the first connectivity port by conducting wire, and the delay testing module is connected by conducting wire
It is connected to second connection end mouth, the packet loss test module is connected with third connectivity port by conducting wire, when the system is restored
Between test module be connected with the 4th by conducting wire and connect port, the back-to-back buffering test module is connected with the 5th by conducting wire and connects
Port, the testing throughput module, delay testing module, packet loss test module, system recovery time test module and back
Backrest buffering test module is each attached to tester interior of shell, the display screen, switch key, the first connectivity port, second
Connectivity port, third connectivity port, the 4th connect port and the 5th and connect port and inlay respectively and be fixed on tester side wall of outer shell.
A kind of fire wall performance test method and device, beneficial effect proposed by the present invention are: the present invention passes through test
Instrument takes turns doing testing throughput, delay testing, packet loss test, system recovery time test and buffering survey back-to-back to firewall
Examination, more accurately can make accurate test and evaluation report to the performance of firewall.
Detailed description of the invention
Fig. 1 is a kind of flow chart of fire wall performance test method proposed by the present invention；
Fig. 2 is a kind of flow chart of the performance test of fire wall performance test method proposed by the present invention；
Fig. 3 is a kind of structure chart of fire wall performance test device proposed by the present invention；
Fig. 4 is a kind of system block diagram of fire wall performance test device proposed by the present invention.
In figure: tester shell 1, display screen 2, switch key 3, the first connectivity port 4, second connection end mouth 5, third connect
It connects port the 6, the 4th and connects port the 7, the 5th and connect port 8.
Specific embodiment
Following will be combined with the drawings in the embodiments of the present invention, and technical solution in the embodiment of the present invention carries out clear, complete
Site preparation description, it is clear that described embodiments are only a part of the embodiments of the present invention, instead of all the embodiments.
Referring to Fig.1-4, a kind of fire wall performance test method, includes the following steps:
S1, establish test philosophy: the content that Firewall testing criterion includes is more, but is mainly reflected in Firewall testing rule
In the formation of model；Establishing test philosophy is always information security focus of attention, the foundation of specification should comprising packet filter firewall,
The safety specifications of application level firewall and hybrid fire wall product or system, and it is suitable for grinding for firewall security function
System, exploitation, test, assessment and product purchasing, while it being also applied for the test to each class firewall, in establishing test philosophy,
" the Firewall testing specification " of the second edition is the main foundation in the content that Firewall testing criterion includes；
S2, build test environment: building for Firewall testing environment should be able to meet the needs of various network applications；
S3, it determines test item: the test item to be carried out is determined according to the positioning for the firewall product tested；
Test item mainly has application proxy test, Telnet agency test, VPN functional test, flow control test, firewall management
Test, security test and performance test；Wherein application proxy test mainly includes the following contents: the main packet of HTT agency's test
Containing the support to http protocol, data integrity test, fault-tolerant ability test, server-compatible test, client compatibility
Test；Telnet agency's test mainly includes the support to Telnet agreement, surveys to the support of media format, fault-tolerant ability
Examination, server-compatible test, client compatibility test；VPN functional test mainly includes tunnel between firewall and firewall
The foundation in road and foundation by client and firewall tunnel, key algorithm is not in test content；Flow control is tested, and is
Refer to and realize mounting with administration interface, exports in real time or in the form of unified report as a result, to facilitate administrator to check and divide
Analyse the operating condition of network, also charge on traffic very easy to accomplish；Firewall management test refers to have to firewall management permission
Administrator management to operating status of behavior and firewall；Security test mainly includes Stability and dependability, operation
Test, itself attack resistance etc.；
S4, performance test: wherein handling capacity, time delay, packet loss, system recovery time and back-to-back buffering test belong to
Component part in performance test includes the following steps: again in performance test
A1, testing throughput: the data on flows of the firewall in target network environment is obtained, data on flows includes firewall
Reception amount and traffic volume, i.e. the handling capacity of firewall, handling capacity is to measure the test of firewall forwarding data packet ability, this
Data are to measure the most important index of firewall, and test handling capacity determines the possibility of tested firewall according to nominal performance first
Handling capacity size so that it is convenient to we come determine test firewall required for tester port number, testing throughput select
RFC protos test suite PROTOS corresponding to tester is tested, and tester can be tested using two points of iterative methods, and tester can be first
First given out a contract for a project using 100% flow, is then compared with the quantity that tester receives the quantity of packet and gives out a contract for a project, if it find that losing
Packet can then be tested using the flow of 50% ((100%+0)/2), if it find that can use 75% ((50%+ without packet loss
100%) flow/2) is tested, and the maximum throughput data of equipment are gone out by the test final test of this two points of iteration,
The standard time tested every time is 2 minutes, each long test that usually will do it 10-30 standard time of packet, specific number
Depending on the accuracy of tester, whether there is packet loss since tester can be severe in judgment, even if thering is a packet not receive, still
Can be with two points of iterative methods toward decline, but this packet loss may not be that equipment causes, it may be possible to cable quality, intermediate interchanger
Or packet loss caused by other reasons, therefore in this case, tester can all be kept away by one appropriate numerical value of setting
Exempt from the influence that other reasons cause packet loss to test result.
A2, delay testing: delay testing is the time required for system processes data packet, and the delay testing of firewall is energy
The performance of its storage forwarding is reacted, delay testing selects RFC protos test suite PROTOS corresponding to tester to be tested, and delay testing is
The test carried out on the basis of testing handling capacity is established, it is big to need first to measure the long handling capacity of each packet before delay testing
It is small, it is tested using 95% or 90% of maximum throughput, test result includes maximum delay, minimal time delay, mean time
Prolong, it is only necessary to record average delay, delay testing duration is the flow for being arranged 2 minutes, and test repeatedly, then takes
Average value is final result；The 90%-100% for the handling capacity result for using each packet long as delay testing uninterrupted, one
As the test request of time delay can not have any packet loss, because if packet loss, will cause that time delay is very big, will cause result
Inaccuracy；
A3, packet loss test: packet loss is the test of test macro packet loss quantity in the case where a fixed load, this
A test is actually similar with testing throughput, and the meaning of test, which is to examine or check by the flow of overload, normally turns firewall
The influence of volatility, packet loss test select RFC protos test suite PROTOS corresponding to tester to be tested, and packet loss test method is
The packet drop for testing system under test (SUT) respectively using the flow of 10%-100%, when the case where load of test 100%, to fire prevention
For wall, packet loss=100%- handling capacity；
A4, system recovery time test: passing through DUT using the flow that tester sends constant rate of speed, and DUT is reset,
Power operation is either carried out, until flow restores normal, recovery time is equal to the ratio of packet loss quantity and packet sending speed；
A5, back-to-back buffering test: back-to-back buffering test mainly tests tested firewall buffered burst data
Ability, test is tested firewall processing bursty traffic is data cached and quickly handles ability, and tester is to firewall
The data packet of certain flow size is sent, sending time is usually 1-2 seconds, then sees that receiving end can receive how many data
Packet, usual firewall lean against buffer capacity and the PPS of handling capacity is consistent；
S5, the performance assessment report for obtaining firewall: the data that will be measured in the small step of each of above-mentioned S4
It records, synthesis is analyzed, and then can make the performance assessment report to firewall.
The present invention also provides a kind of fire wall performance test device, including tester shell 1, inside tester shell 1
It is fixed with central processing module, central processing module is connected separately with testing throughput module, delay testing mould by conducting wire
Block, packet loss test module, system recovery time test module, back-to-back buffering test module, display screen 2 and switch key 3,
Testing throughput module is connected with the first connectivity port 4 by conducting wire, and delay testing module is connected with the second connection by conducting wire
Port 5, packet loss test module are connected with third connectivity port 6 by conducting wire, and system recovery time test module passes through conducting wire
It being connected with the 4th and connects port 7, back-to-back buffering test module is connected with the 5th by conducting wire and connects port 8, testing throughput module,
Delay testing module, packet loss test module, system recovery time test module and back-to-back buffering test module are each attached to
Inside tester shell 1, display screen 2, switch key 3, the first connectivity port 4, second connection end mouth 5, third connectivity port 6,
4th, which connects port 7 and the 5th, connects port 8 and inlays respectively and be fixed on 1 side wall of tester shell.
The foregoing is only a preferred embodiment of the present invention, but scope of protection of the present invention is not limited thereto,
Anyone skilled in the art in the technical scope disclosed by the present invention, according to the technique and scheme of the present invention and its
Inventive concept is subject to equivalent substitution or change, should be covered by the protection scope of the present invention.
Claims (6)
1. a kind of fire wall performance test method, which comprises the steps of:
S1, establish test philosophy: the content that Firewall testing criterion includes is more, but is mainly reflected in Firewall testing specification
In formation；
S2, build test environment: building for Firewall testing environment should be able to meet the needs of various network applications；
S3, it determines test item: the test item to be carried out is determined according to the positioning for the firewall product tested；
S4, performance test: wherein handling capacity, time delay, packet loss, system recovery time and back-to-back buffering test belong to performance
Component part in test includes the following steps: again in performance test
A1, testing throughput: the data on flows of the firewall in target network environment is obtained, data on flows includes connecing for firewall
Receipts amount and traffic volume, the i.e. handling capacity of firewall, testing throughput select RFC protos test suite PROTOS corresponding to tester to be surveyed
Examination, tester can be tested using two points of iterative methods, and tester can be given out a contract for a project using 100% flow first, then with test
The quantity that instrument receives the quantity of packet and gives out a contract for a project compares, if it find that packet loss, then can use the flow of 50% ((100%+0)/2)
It is tested, if it find that can be tested using the flow of 75% ((50%+100%)/2) without packet loss, pass through this two
The test final test of point iteration goes out the maximum throughput data of equipment, and the standard time tested every time is 2 minutes, and each packet is grown
It usually will do it the test of 10-30 standard time；
A2, delay testing: delay testing selects RFC protos test suite PROTOS corresponding to tester to be tested, and delay testing is to establish
The test carried out on the basis of testing handling capacity, delay testing need first to measure the long handling capacity size of each packet before,
It is tested using 95% or 90% of maximum throughput, test result includes maximum delay, minimal time delay, average delay,
It only needs to record average delay, delay testing duration is the flow for being arranged 2 minutes, and test repeatedly, is then made even
Mean value is final result；
A3, packet loss test: packet loss test selects RFC protos test suite PROTOS corresponding to tester to be tested, packet loss test
Method is to test the packet drop of system under test (SUT) respectively using the flow of 10%-100%, when the case where load of test 100%,
For firewall, packet loss=100%- handling capacity；
A4, system recovery time test: passing through DUT using the flow that tester sends constant rate of speed, and DUT is reset, or
It is to carry out power operation, until flow restores normal, recovery time is equal to the ratio of packet loss quantity and packet sending speed；
A5, back-to-back buffering test: tester sends the data packet of certain flow size to firewall, and sending time is usually 1-
2 seconds, then see that receiving end can receive how many data packets, the PPS for leaning against buffer capacity and handling capacity of usual firewall
It is consistent；
S5, the performance assessment report for obtaining firewall: the data record that will be measured in the small step of each of above-mentioned S4
Get off, synthesis is analyzed, and then can make the performance assessment report to firewall.
2. a kind of fire wall performance test method according to claim 1, which is characterized in that in step sl, establishing
In test philosophy, " the Firewall testing specification " of the second edition is the main foundation in the content that Firewall testing criterion includes.
3. a kind of fire wall performance test method according to claim 1, which is characterized in that in step s3, test item
Mesh mainly have application proxy test, Telnet agency test, VPN functional test, flow control test, firewall management test,
Security test and performance test.
4. a kind of fire wall performance test method according to claim 1, which is characterized in that in step A1, due to surveying
Examination instrument can be severe in judgment whether have packet loss, even if there is a packet not receive, still can use two points of iterative methods are past to decline, but this
A packet loss may not be that equipment causes, therefore in this case, tester can all be kept away by one appropriate numerical value of setting
Exempt from the influence that other reasons cause packet loss to test result.
5. a kind of fire wall performance test method according to claim 1, which is characterized in that in step A2, with each
Uninterrupted of the 90%-100% of long handling capacity result as delay testing is wrapped, the test request of general time delay can not have
Any packet loss will cause that time delay is very big because if packet loss, will cause the inaccuracy of result.
6. a kind of fire wall performance test device according to claim 1, which is characterized in that including tester shell (1),
It is fixed with central processing module inside the tester shell (1), the central processing module is connected separately with by conducting wire
Testing throughput module, delay testing module, packet loss test module, system recovery time test module, buffering is surveyed back-to-back
Die trial block, display screen (2) and switch key (3), the testing throughput module are connected with the first connectivity port by conducting wire
(4), the delay testing module is connected with second connection end mouth (5) by conducting wire, and the packet loss test module passes through conducting wire
It is connected with third connectivity port (6), the system recovery time test module is connected with the 4th by conducting wire and connects port (7), institute
It states back-to-back buffering test module and is connected with the 5th by conducting wire and connect port (8), the testing throughput module, delay testing mould
Block, packet loss test module, system recovery time test module and back-to-back buffering test module are each attached to tester shell
(1) internal, the display screen (2), switch key (3), the first connectivity port (4), second connection end mouth (5), third connecting pin
Mouthful (6), the 4th connect port (7) and the 5th and connect port (8) and inlay respectively and be fixed on tester shell (1) side wall.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201910506672.2A CN110213135A (en) | 2019-06-12 | 2019-06-12 | A kind of fire wall performance test method and device |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201910506672.2A CN110213135A (en) | 2019-06-12 | 2019-06-12 | A kind of fire wall performance test method and device |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN110213135A true CN110213135A (en) | 2019-09-06 |
Family
ID=67792202
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201910506672.2A Pending CN110213135A (en) | 2019-06-12 | 2019-06-12 | A kind of fire wall performance test method and device |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN110213135A (en) |
Cited By (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN110535730A (en) * | 2019-09-23 | 2019-12-03 | 杭州迪普科技股份有限公司 | The IP authentication function test method and device of the network equipment |
| CN111600781A (en) * | 2020-07-27 | 2020-08-28 | 中国人民解放军国防科技大学 | Firewall system stability testing method based on tester |
| CN113014450A (en) * | 2021-02-24 | 2021-06-22 | 北京信而泰科技股份有限公司 | Equipment testing method, device and computer readable medium |
| CN114006838A (en) * | 2021-10-30 | 2022-02-01 | 杭州迪普信息技术有限公司 | Testing method and system of flow control equipment |
| CN114157592A (en) * | 2021-11-09 | 2022-03-08 | 北京天融信网络安全技术有限公司 | Test system and method for network equipment flow management |
| CN114363217A (en) * | 2021-12-23 | 2022-04-15 | 北京六方云信息技术有限公司 | RFC2544 throughput performance test method, system, equipment and medium |
Citations (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN102970186A (en) * | 2012-12-03 | 2013-03-13 | 网神信息技术（北京）股份有限公司 | Equipment performance detection method and equipment performance detection device |
| CN109600273A (en) * | 2018-11-26 | 2019-04-09 | 武汉思普崚技术有限公司 | A kind of optimization method and system of UDP message transmission performance |
-
2019
- 2019-06-12 CN CN201910506672.2A patent/CN110213135A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN102970186A (en) * | 2012-12-03 | 2013-03-13 | 网神信息技术（北京）股份有限公司 | Equipment performance detection method and equipment performance detection device |
| CN109600273A (en) * | 2018-11-26 | 2019-04-09 | 武汉思普崚技术有限公司 | A kind of optimization method and system of UDP message transmission performance |
Non-Patent Citations (2)
| Title |
|---|
| ACHEJQ: "关于防火墙的性能测试", 《CSDN博客》 * |
| 何军: "防火墙测试", 《网络安全技术与应用》 * |
Cited By (8)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN110535730A (en) * | 2019-09-23 | 2019-12-03 | 杭州迪普科技股份有限公司 | The IP authentication function test method and device of the network equipment |
| CN110535730B (en) * | 2019-09-23 | 2020-12-29 | 杭州迪普科技股份有限公司 | IP authentication function test method and device of network equipment |
| CN111600781A (en) * | 2020-07-27 | 2020-08-28 | 中国人民解放军国防科技大学 | Firewall system stability testing method based on tester |
| CN113014450A (en) * | 2021-02-24 | 2021-06-22 | 北京信而泰科技股份有限公司 | Equipment testing method, device and computer readable medium |
| CN113014450B (en) * | 2021-02-24 | 2022-07-05 | 北京信而泰科技股份有限公司 | Equipment testing method, device and computer readable medium |
| CN114006838A (en) * | 2021-10-30 | 2022-02-01 | 杭州迪普信息技术有限公司 | Testing method and system of flow control equipment |
| CN114157592A (en) * | 2021-11-09 | 2022-03-08 | 北京天融信网络安全技术有限公司 | Test system and method for network equipment flow management |
| CN114363217A (en) * | 2021-12-23 | 2022-04-15 | 北京六方云信息技术有限公司 | RFC2544 throughput performance test method, system, equipment and medium |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN110213135A (en) | A kind of fire wall performance test method and device | |
| Strauss et al. | A measurement study of available bandwidth estimation tools | |
| McGregor et al. | The NLANR network analysis infrastructure | |
| CA2110142C (en) | Event driven interface for a system for monitoring and controlling a data communications network | |
| CN103650569B (en) | Wireless network method for diagnosing faults and equipment | |
| Paxson | Towards a framework for defining Internet performance metrics | |
| Barford et al. | Measuring web performance in the wide area | |
| US5493689A (en) | System for configuring an event driven interface including control blocks defining good loop locations in a memory which represent detection of a characteristic pattern | |
| KR101709795B1 (en) | Intelligent monitoring of an electrical utility grid | |
| US5375070A (en) | Information collection architecture and method for a data communications network | |
| Weber et al. | An advanced seismic network in the southern Apennines (Italy) for seismicity investigations and experimentation with earthquake early warning | |
| US10616088B2 (en) | Apparatus and method for measurements at intermediate nodes in end-to-end performance test | |
| Barford et al. | Critical path analysis of TCP transactions | |
| CN103780454B (en) | A kind of based on the distributed network performance measurement system and the method that access gateway | |
| CN106713074A (en) | Data network quality piecewise detection method and system based on service content | |
| CN108809708A (en) | A kind of powerline network node failure detecting system | |
| CN106656679A (en) | Available bandwidth measurement method and device | |
| CN110912784A (en) | Ethernet bus network test equipment | |
| EP1746769A1 (en) | Measurement system and method of measuring a transit metric | |
| Stubailo et al. | Latency of waveform data delivery from the Southern California seismic network during the 2019 Ridgecrest earthquake sequence and its effect on ShakeAlert | |
| CN109831462A (en) | A kind of method for detecting virus and device | |
| CN105207835B (en) | A kind of determination method and device of the network element working condition of WLAN | |
| CN103036743A (en) | Transmission control protocol (TCP) heartbeat detecting method of spy trojan | |
| Iqbal et al. | Performance analysis of indonesia cable based tsunameter (INA-CBT) Rokatenda ring topology | |
| Si et al. | Teacp: A toolkit for evaluation and analysis of collection protocols in wireless sensor networks |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |
Application publication date: 20190906 |
|
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |