CN110197364B - Examination system based on augmented reality content - Google Patents
Examination system based on augmented reality content Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN110197364B CN110197364B CN201910490038.4A CN201910490038A CN110197364B CN 110197364 B CN110197364 B CN 110197364B CN 201910490038 A CN201910490038 A CN 201910490038A CN 110197364 B CN110197364 B CN 110197364B
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- examination
- content
- review
- examined
- registration
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/10—Office automation; Time management
Abstract
The invention provides a review system based on augmented reality content, which comprises: an acquisition unit: the system comprises a registration marker, display information and interaction information, wherein the registration marker is used for acquiring AR content to be examined, analyzing the AR content to be examined and acquiring the registration marker, the display information and the interaction information; an examination unit: and the registration marker, the display information and the interaction information are examined according to a preset examination standard to obtain an examination result. The system can inspect the uploaded AR content, whether the inspection meets the preset inspection standard or not is judged, and the defect that the AR content is not inspected in the prior art is overcome.
Description
Technical Field
The invention belongs to the technical field of augmented reality, and particularly relates to a review system based on augmented reality content.
Background
With the development of the AR technology, the identification marker can only identify complex planar pictures, to simple logos, to single text symbols, to three-dimensional real objects, and then can also identify real-time gesture actions, or possibly speech. But advances in technology also bring non-technical problems.
For example, a user uses artware such as ancient calligraphy and painting of the Imperial palace (Fuchun mountain stay Picture in Qingming river Picture in Langting order), porcelain (Ma Zhan Feiyan Green jade cabbage) and the like as identification markers, and the artware is manufactured and uploaded to an AR open application platform, and the identification markers are probably occupied although the enterprise infringement is not involved.
For example, a user uses a logo or mascot of a celebration, a celebration or a large event as an identification marker, and manufactures and uploads AR content to an AR application platform, and the logo or mascot belongs to public resources, so that the AR application platform determines whether to examine the AR content.
Augmented reality requires identification of the physical environment, either geographically or real in reality, to load virtual content in current reality. Therefore, the registration identifier is one of the basic links. With the development of technology and the popularization of AR applications, registration marker management, supervision and review have become essential work for AR content platforms.
Disclosure of Invention
Aiming at the defects in the prior art, the invention provides a review system based on augmented reality content, which can review AR content.
An augmented reality content-based review system comprising:
an acquisition unit: the system comprises a registration marker, a geographic position, display information and/or interaction information, a display unit and a server, wherein the registration marker, the geographic position, the display information and/or the interaction information are/is used for acquiring AR content to be examined and analyzing the AR content to be examined;
an examination unit: and the system is used for examining the registration marker, the geographic position, the display information and/or the interaction information according to a preset examination standard to obtain an examination result.
Preferably, the examination unit is specifically configured to construct a registration identifier database including a plurality of examination registration identifiers; and when an examination registration marker identical to the registration marker in the AR content to be examined exists in the registration marker database, defining that the examination of the registration marker of the AR content to be examined does not pass, and generating an examination result.
Preferably, the examination unit is specifically configured to define that the registration identifier of the AR content to be examined passes examination and generate the examination result when it is detected that the geographic location in the AR content to be examined belongs to a preset prohibited geographic location or the registration identifier is a public resource.
Preferably, the review criteria include erotic violence review criteria, religious review criteria, and political review criteria;
the examination unit is specifically configured to define that the examination of the AR content to be examined is not passed and generate the examination result when detecting that the display information in the AR content to be examined meets the erotic violence examination standard, the religious examination standard and the political examination standard.
Preferably, the review criteria include policy review criteria and infringement review criteria;
the examination unit is specifically configured to define that the examination of the interaction information of the AR content to be examined does not pass and generate the examination result when detecting that the interaction information in the AR content to be examined meets the policy examination standard and the infringement examination standard.
Preferably, the examination unit is specifically configured to construct a blacklist database including a plurality of blacklists; and when detecting that the blacklist identical to the user uploading the AR content to be examined exists in the blacklist database, the examination unit defines that the AR content to be examined does not pass examination and generates the examination result.
Preferably, the examination unit is further configured to receive external examination data, and examine the registration identifier, the presentation information, and the interaction information according to the external examination data to obtain an examination result.
Preferably, the system further comprises:
an update unit: for updating the review criteria and blacklist database.
According to the technical scheme, the examination system based on the augmented reality content can examine the uploaded AR content, and whether the examination meets the preset examination standard or not is checked, so that the defect that the examination of the AR content is lacked in the prior art is overcome.
Drawings
In order to more clearly illustrate the detailed description of the invention or the technical solutions in the prior art, the drawings that are needed in the detailed description of the invention or the prior art will be briefly described below. Throughout the drawings, like elements or portions are generally identified by like reference numerals. In the drawings, elements or portions are not necessarily drawn to scale.
Fig. 1 is a block diagram of an audit system according to an embodiment of the present invention.
Fig. 2 is a flowchart of an audit of a registration marker according to an embodiment of the present invention.
Fig. 3 is a flowchart of geographic location auditing according to an embodiment of the present invention.
Fig. 4 is a flowchart of legal review provided by an embodiment of the present invention.
Fig. 5 is a flowchart of policy review according to an embodiment of the present invention.
Fig. 6 is a flowchart of blacklist audit according to an embodiment of the present invention.
Detailed Description
Embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings. The following examples are only for illustrating the technical solutions of the present invention more clearly, and therefore are only examples, and the protection scope of the present invention is not limited thereby. It is to be noted that, unless otherwise specified, technical or scientific terms used herein shall have the ordinary meaning as understood by those skilled in the art to which the invention pertains.
It will be understood that the terms "comprises" and/or "comprising," when used in this specification and the appended claims, specify the presence of stated features, integers, steps, operations, elements, and/or components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps, operations, elements, components, and/or groups thereof.
It is also to be understood that the terminology used in the description of the invention herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of the invention. As used in the specification of the present invention and the appended claims, the singular forms "a," "an," and "the" are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.
As used in this specification and the appended claims, the term "if" may be interpreted contextually as "when", "upon" or "in response to a determination" or "in response to a detection". Similarly, the phrase "if it is determined" or "if a [ described condition or event ] is detected" may be interpreted contextually to mean "upon determining" or "in response to determining" or "upon detecting [ described condition or event ]" or "in response to detecting [ described condition or event ]".
The first embodiment is as follows:
an augmented reality content-based review system, see fig. 1, comprising:
an acquisition unit: the system comprises a registration marker, display information and interaction information, wherein the registration marker is used for acquiring AR content to be examined, analyzing the AR content to be examined and acquiring the registration marker, the display information and the interaction information;
an examination unit: and the registration marker, the display information and the interaction information are examined according to a preset examination standard to obtain an examination result.
Specifically, the AR can be classified into about two types from its technical means and manifestation: one is Vision-based AR, i.e., computer Vision-based AR, and the other is LBS-based AR, i.e., AR based on geographical location information.
Image registration is a process of matching and superimposing two or more images acquired at different times and under different sensors (imaging devices) or under different conditions (weather, illuminance, camera position and angle, etc.), and has been widely applied to the fields of remote sensing data analysis, computer vision, image processing, etc. The image registration identifier is used for image registration, also called image registration identifier. Registration (registration) markers broadly refer to markers that can be used for image registration, three-dimensional data registration, geo-location registration, audio registration, video registration, motion registration, and the like.
The examination standard includes a definition standard of political policy, a definition standard of law and regulation, a definition standard of religious culture, a definition standard of erotic violence, a definition standard of public resources (such as public buildings, historical cultural relics and the like), a definition standard of enterprise infringement (such as enterprise logo and the like), a standard of platform cooperation (such as whether each platform is authorized to use or not), an approval standard of authorized release (such as a qualification document provided when an authorized use application is made), a duration and an authorization standard of continuous use (such as effective duration and continuous times of single use of a registration marker). The examination standard can be set by each AR platform, and can be a platform internal standard, a platform inter-standard, or an existing standard.
The system censored content includes political policies, military, religion, pornography, violence, etc. The method comprises the steps of splitting the AR content to be inspected, obtaining three types of registration markers, display information and interaction information, inspecting according to the inspection standards of all types, and if the AR content to be inspected meets the preset inspection standards, not passing the inspection. Otherwise, the examination is passed. If the examination is not passed, the user can be required to modify and edit the AR content to be examined, and the AR content cannot be published and used until the examination is passed.
The system can inspect the uploaded AR content, whether the inspection meets the preset inspection standard or not is judged, and the defect that the AR content is not inspected in the prior art is overcome.
Referring to fig. 2, the examination unit is specifically configured to construct a registration identifier database including a plurality of examination registration identifiers; and when an examination registration marker identical to the registration marker in the AR content to be examined exists in the registration marker database, defining that the examination of the registration marker of the AR content to be examined does not pass, and generating an examination result.
Specifically, the constructed registration marker database comprises national emblems, national flags, party emblems, unauthorized enterprise logos, pornographic violence and the like. The system is used to examine whether registration markers per se cannot be used in the AR field.
For example, an examination method using currency as an AR registration marker includes:
1) acquiring a 2D model or a 3D model containing double-sided pictures of paper money and coins, and establishing a negative list database of currency (including the paper money and the coins);
2) when the AR application user uploads the AR content, the registration marker in the AR content is obtained and compared with the negative list database.
3) If the comparison result is highly similar to the existing model in the negative list database, the examination is not passed. This step may also be followed by a manual identification (to review whether to use a currency pattern or three-dimensional data as a registration marker) after the negative list database comparison; and if not, obtaining an audit result: by or may be used. If the manual judgment is yes, obtaining an audit result: no supplemental data is submitted or required.
4) If the verification result is that the supplementary data needs to be submitted, the AR application user is reminded to upload the related data.
5) And (4) repeating the auditing process in the step (3) until the auditing result is passed.
Specifically, the registration marker in the system may be a 2D picture, or may also be a 3D solid object or a motion gesture. In particular applications, the registration markers may be classified.
Classification for 2D. For example, ancient painting and calligraphy (in Langting order, in the riverside scene at Qingming dynasty, in the Fuchunshan residential map) can be classified as pictures-cultural relics. For example, a logo and mascot for celebration, celebration and large-scale activities can be classified into a picture-society. Certificate covers (wedding certificates, motor vehicle drivers licenses, passports, harbor and australian passes, etc.), publication covers (laws, regulations, Party seals, biographies) can be classified as picture-policy.
Classification for 3D. For example, porcelain (Cuiyu cabbage, Ma Zu Fei Yan) can be classified as 3D-cultural relics, such as Guangzhou tower, Wuyang statue, and fire engine can be classified as 3D-public resource.
Classification for motion gestures. Action gestures refer to some dispute gestures that are socially common. Such as gestures involving insulting information for politics, religions, nationalities, and the like. Such as vertical middle fingers, etc.
Referring to fig. 3, the examination unit is specifically configured to define that the registration identifier of the AR content to be examined passes examination and generate the examination result when it is detected that the geographic location in the AR content to be examined belongs to a preset prohibited geographic location or the registration identifier is a common resource.
Specifically, for example, the review unit reviews whether the geographic location in the AR content to be reviewed is a government department, a military base, a historical relic, a city landmark building, a memorial hall, or the like, and if so, does not pass the review. The examination unit is further configured to examine whether the registration identifier itself belongs to a common resource, and if so, to disregard the examination.
For example, an examination method using a set location a as an AR geographical location includes:
1) and adding the geographical position of the set position A into a geographical position negative list database.
2) When the AR application user uploads the AR content containing the geographic position information, the geographic position information in the AR content is obtained and compared with the negative list database.
3) If the comparison result is highly similar to the existing data in the geographical position negative list database, the examination is not passed. This step may also be followed by a manual identification (to check if the set location a is used as the geographic location of the AR content) after the geographic location negative list database comparison. And if not, obtaining an audit result: by or may be used. If the manual judgment is yes, obtaining an audit result: no supplemental data is submitted or required.
4) If the verification result is that the supplementary data needs to be submitted, the AR application user is reminded to upload the related data.
5) And (4) repeating the auditing process in the step (3) until the auditing result is passed.
Specifically, the geographical location information includes a national political sensitive address, a military confidential address, a historical cultural relic address, a city landmark address, and the like. The address location information of the system is classified according to security level. Some are absolutely prohibited, others require authorization or proof material, and require submission of audit supplemental material.
Referring to fig. 4, the examination criteria include erotic violence examination criteria, religious examination criteria, and political examination criteria;
the examination unit is specifically configured to define that the examination of the AR content to be examined is not passed and generate the examination result when detecting that the display information in the AR content to be examined meets the erotic violence examination standard, the religious examination standard and the political examination standard.
The system examines whether the display information of the AR content to be examined meets erotic violence examination standards, religious examination standards and political examination standards, and if so, the AR content is not passed the examination.
For example, the examination method for AR content containing violent erotic content is as follows:
1) adding pictures or three-dimensional models of violent erotic content into a negative list database;
2) when the AR application user uploads AR content containing violence, the AR application user compares the AR content with the negative list database;
3) if the comparison result is highly similar to the existing data of the negative list database, the examination is not passed. After the negative list database is compared, manual identification (whether the review AR content contains the violent erotic content) can be carried out, and whether the manual judgment is negative or not can be judged, so that a review result is obtained: by or may be used. If the manual judgment is yes, obtaining an audit result: not passing through.
Referring to fig. 5, the review criteria include policy review criteria and infringement review criteria;
the examination unit is specifically configured to define that the examination of the interaction information of the AR content to be examined does not pass and generate the examination result when detecting that the interaction information in the AR content to be examined meets the policy examination standard and the infringement examination standard.
The system examines whether the interactive information of the AR content to be examined meets the policy examination criteria and the infringement examination criteria, and if so, passes the examination.
Referring to fig. 6, the examination unit is specifically configured to construct a blacklist database including a plurality of blacklists; and when detecting that the blacklist identical to the user uploading the AR content to be examined exists in the blacklist database, the examination unit defines that the AR content to be examined does not pass examination and generates the examination result.
Specifically, the system can also check whether the users who upload the AR content to be checked currently are history blacklist users or cross-platform blacklist users provided by an external platform.
Preferably, the examination unit is further configured to receive external examination data, and examine the registration identifier, the presentation information, and the interaction information according to the external examination data to obtain an examination result.
The system may also enable cross-platform review, with collaborative review with other platforms. Therefore, data of a plurality of platforms can be shared during examination, so that examination is more comprehensive and accurate.
Preferably, the system further comprises:
an update unit: for updating the review criteria and blacklist database.
The system is also used for updating and perfecting each database, such as instantly updating and perfecting policy and regulation, updating and perfecting hot events, perfecting blacklists and perfecting cross-platform data.
Finally, it should be noted that: the above embodiments are only used to illustrate the technical solution of the present invention, and not to limit the same; while the invention has been described in detail and with reference to the foregoing embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that: the technical solutions described in the foregoing embodiments may still be modified, or some or all of the technical features may be equivalently replaced; such modifications and substitutions do not depart from the spirit and scope of the present invention, and they should be construed as being included in the following claims and description.
Claims (3)
1. An augmented reality content-based review system, comprising:
an acquisition unit: the system comprises a registration marker, a geographic position, display information and/or interaction information, a display unit and a server, wherein the registration marker, the geographic position, the display information and/or the interaction information are/is used for acquiring AR content to be examined and analyzing the AR content to be examined;
an examination unit: the system comprises a registration marker, a geographic position, display information and/or interaction information, a registration server and a database, wherein the registration marker, the geographic position, the display information and/or the interaction information are/is used for registering the registration marker, the geographic position, the display information and/or the interaction information according to a preset examination standard to obtain an examination result;
the examination unit is specifically used for constructing a registration marker database comprising a plurality of examination registration markers; when an examination registration marker identical to the registration marker in the AR content to be examined exists in the registration marker database, defining that the examination of the registration marker of the AR content to be examined does not pass, and generating an examination result;
the review unit is specifically configured to define that the registration marker of the AR content to be reviewed does not review the AR content when detecting that the geographic location in the AR content to be reviewed belongs to a preset prohibited geographic location or that the registration marker is a public resource, generate the review result, and perform manual identification when reviewing the geographic location of the AR content;
the examination standard comprises a erotic violence examination standard, a religious examination standard and a political examination standard; the examination unit is specifically used for defining that the display information of the AR content to be examined does not pass examination and generating the examination result when detecting that the display information in the AR content to be examined meets the erotic violence examination standard, the religious examination standard and the political examination standard;
the review criteria include policy review criteria and infringement review criteria; the examination unit is specifically used for defining that the examination of the interactive information of the AR content to be examined does not pass and generating the examination result when detecting that the interactive information in the AR content to be examined meets the policy examination standard and the infringement examination standard;
the examination unit is specifically used for constructing a blacklist database comprising a plurality of blacklists; and when detecting that the blacklist identical to the user uploading the AR content to be examined exists in the blacklist database, the examination unit defines that the AR content to be examined does not pass examination and generates the examination result.
2. The augmented reality content-based review system of claim 1, wherein the review unit is further configured to receive external review data, and review the registration identifier, the presentation information, and the interaction information according to the external review data to obtain a review result.
3. The augmented reality content-based review system of claim 1, further comprising: an update unit: for updating the review criteria and blacklist database.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201910490038.4A CN110197364B (en) | 2019-06-06 | 2019-06-06 | Examination system based on augmented reality content |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201910490038.4A CN110197364B (en) | 2019-06-06 | 2019-06-06 | Examination system based on augmented reality content |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN110197364A CN110197364A (en) | 2019-09-03 |
| CN110197364B true CN110197364B (en) | 2022-04-15 |
Family
ID=67754044
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201910490038.4A Active CN110197364B (en) | 2019-06-06 | 2019-06-06 | Examination system based on augmented reality content |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN110197364B (en) |
Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN105046213A (en) * | 2015-06-30 | 2015-11-11 | 成都微力互动科技有限公司 | Method for augmenting reality |
| CN108492121A (en) * | 2018-04-18 | 2018-09-04 | 景德镇止语堂陶瓷有限公司 | A kind of system and method based on the VR technical identification Freehandhand-drawing tea set true and falses |
| CN109716384A (en) * | 2016-09-23 | 2019-05-03 | 皮卡特有限责任公司 | Augmented reality implementation method |
Family Cites Families (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US10620817B2 (en) * | 2017-01-13 | 2020-04-14 | International Business Machines Corporation | Providing augmented reality links to stored files |
-
2019
- 2019-06-06 CN CN201910490038.4A patent/CN110197364B/en active Active
Patent Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN105046213A (en) * | 2015-06-30 | 2015-11-11 | 成都微力互动科技有限公司 | Method for augmenting reality |
| CN109716384A (en) * | 2016-09-23 | 2019-05-03 | 皮卡特有限责任公司 | Augmented reality implementation method |
| CN108492121A (en) * | 2018-04-18 | 2018-09-04 | 景德镇止语堂陶瓷有限公司 | A kind of system and method based on the VR technical identification Freehandhand-drawing tea set true and falses |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN110197364A (en) | 2019-09-03 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN107358146B (en) | Method for processing video frequency, device and storage medium | |
| CN111886842B (en) | Remote user authentication using threshold-based matching | |
| US7672483B2 (en) | Controlling and customizing access to spatial information | |
| US10726262B2 (en) | Imaging support system, device and method, and imaging terminal | |
| CN109766779A (en) | It hovers personal identification method and Related product | |
| CN112650875A (en) | House image verification method and device, computer equipment and storage medium | |
| WO2019210575A1 (en) | Real estate information enquiry method and apparatus, and computer device and storage medium | |
| CN113393471A (en) | Image processing method and device | |
| Callahan et al. | Close-Range Photogrammetry with Laser Scan Point Clouds | |
| CN110378886B (en) | Image comparison method, image comparison device, electronic device and medium | |
| CN110197364B (en) | Examination system based on augmented reality content | |
| Parveen et al. | Classification and evaluation of digital forensic tools | |
| CN111386711A (en) | Method, device and system for managing electronic fingerprints of electronic files | |
| KR20160082917A (en) | Method and apparatus for authenticating media data | |
| Pawade et al. | Blockchain based secure traffic police assistant system | |
| KR102396429B1 (en) | Image analysis system for extracting doubts about urban change | |
| CN114417397A (en) | Behavior portrait construction method and device, storage medium and computer equipment | |
| CN109726883A (en) | A kind of risk management and control method of insurance business, device, equipment and storage medium | |
| Hong et al. | The use of CCTV in the emergency response: A 3D GIS perspective | |
| CN111898155B (en) | Information storage method, information checking method and information storage and checking system | |
| KR102231869B1 (en) | Web based personal information protection service system and the method there of | |
| CN113411227A (en) | AR (augmented reality) -assisted network equipment testing method and device | |
| WO2020179052A1 (en) | Image processing device, control method, and program | |
| Yan et al. | Application of computer vision technology in surface damage detection and analysis of shedthin tiles in China: a case study of the classical gardens of Suzhou | |
| CN113792789B (en) | Class-activated thermodynamic diagram-based image tampering detection and positioning method and system |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant |