CN110119902A - A kind of determination method of the railway combined assessment indicator system of public welfare - Google Patents
A kind of determination method of the railway combined assessment indicator system of public welfare Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN110119902A CN110119902A CN201910416679.5A CN201910416679A CN110119902A CN 110119902 A CN110119902 A CN 110119902A CN 201910416679 A CN201910416679 A CN 201910416679A CN 110119902 A CN110119902 A CN 110119902A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- index
- degree
- public welfare
- railway
- microstructure layer
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
- G06Q10/06393—Score-carding, benchmarking or key performance indicator [KPI] analysis
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Educational Administration (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
The invention discloses a kind of determination methods of the railway combined assessment indicator system of public welfare, the following steps are included: S1: the target layers structure of the building railway combined evaluation of public welfare, the target layers structure includes Macro, middle sight layer and microstructure layer, the Macro includes 5 indexs, and the middle sight layer and microstructure layer respectively include 35 indexs；S2: the weight of each microstructure layer index in target layers structure is determined.The present invention, which efficiently solves the prior art, can not carry out that the railway combined evaluation of public welfare, index system is not comprehensive enough, index practicability is not high enough, the problems such as relying primarily on expert's qualitative analysis in poor operability and traditional method；The present invention realizes the fuzzy overall evaluation of public welfare railway quantitative target and qualitative index, embodies the high feature of public welfare railway social benefit, meets public welfare Railway Sustainable Development requirement, filled up the blank of the railway combined assessment technique of public welfare.
Description
Technical field
The present invention relates to Environment in Railway Engineering Construction field, in particular to a kind of railway combined assessment indicator system of public welfare is really
Determine method.
Background technique
Carry out the research for being directed to public welfare System of Comprehensive Evaluation and evaluation method, helping to clear influences public welfare iron
The complicated factor and its interaction relationship of road construction and operation fully realize the contribution to society and construction meaning of such railway,
The economic evaluation system for expanding current railway, for realizing that the scientific, reasonable of public welfare railway, high efficiency operation and sustainability are sent out
Exhibition all plays a significant role.
In the prior art, there are no the System of Comprehensive Evaluation and evaluation method appearance for public welfare railway.Tradition
Way rely primarily on dependent on a series of social benefit index of select expert, then determined by qualitative analysis, it is different
Select expert evaluation index may in different or even some evaluation activities evaluation index selection it is incomplete, to lead
The quantitative calculating and the inadequate specification of qualitative description and complete of index are caused, specific aim is not strong, and the evaluation dependent on the selection of people's subjectivity
Index has biggish randomness, poor universality, and evaluation method can not be reused.
Summary of the invention
It is an object of the invention to fill up in the presence of the prior art about the railway combined assessment indicator system of public welfare
With the blank of evaluation method, overcomes the excessive expert's subjectivity that relies on during traditional method to select, do not unite so as to cause evaluation index
One, not perfect, the deficiency that the method for determination can not be reused provides a kind of determination of railway combined assessment indicator system of public welfare
Method.
In order to achieve the above-mentioned object of the invention, the present invention provides following technical schemes:
A kind of determination method of the railway combined assessment indicator system of public welfare, comprising the following steps:
S1: building the railway combined evaluation of public welfare target layers structure, the target layers structure include Macro, in
See layer and microstructure layer；
The Macro includes five strategic importance, society and politics, social environment, natural environment and other factors indexs；
The middle sight layer include national strategy, regional strategy, local strategy, national defense construction, social stability, national unity,
National economic profit, financial benefit drive Regional Economic Development, employment effects, accurate poverty alleviation, improve the income of residents, to correlation
The induced effect of industry, speeds up urbanization, advances science at the development for promoting the developments of resources such as mineral products, promoting regional tourism
The development of education, the development for promoting ideology and culture, the development for promoting health care, raising quality of residents'life, promotion area are comprehensive
Competitiveness is closed, atmosphere pollution, energy consumption, ploughs and herds the land seizures such as woods, water and soil conservation, influence of noise, the shadow to drinking water source
Sound, the influence to natural scenic spot, ecological safety guarantee, improves disaster assistance ability, improves railway at the influence to wild animal
Road network layout improves overall transportation system, the opinion of local government, the opinion of subjective reflection, amounts to 35 indexs；
The microstructure layer includes that the national strategy goodness of fit, the regional strategy goodness of fit, the strategic goodness of fit in place, national security change
Kind degree, social stability improve degree, national exchange and integration enhancing degree, economic internal rate of return (EIRR), financial internal rate of return (FIRR),
GDP GDP incrementss, every kilometer of drive employment volume, population below the poverty line slip speed-raising amount, resident average per capita disposable
Income increase coefficient, every kilometer of relevant enterprise accelerate, development of resources coefficient, every kilometer of annual tourist arrivals' increment, every
The annual urban population increment of kilometer, education of science develop raising degree, advanced idea cultural spreading improves degree, health care
Cause improves degree, Engel coefficient, synthesized competitiveness and improves the gas emissions, electric power coal oil such as degree, carbon dioxide
Areas occupied, soil erosion area, noise figure, wastewater discharge, the wild animals and plants such as equal consumptions, arable land grazing forest land influence
Coefficient, natural scenic spots influence coefficient, ecological safety degree of protection, rescue personnel and goods and materials shipping time or scale, railway road network
It is laid out improvement degree, overall transportation system improves degree, governmental support degree, resident's support, total 35 indexs；
S2: the weight of each microstructure layer index in target layers structure is determined.
Preferably, in the step S2, the weight of each microstructure layer index is calculated using G1 method.
Preferably, using G1 method calculate each microstructure layer index weight the following steps are included:
S21: according to importance degree descending sort, the microstructure layer index after sequence is respectively X=(x1, x2... x35),
The weight for defining each index is respectively W=(w1, w2... w35)；
S22: the two neighboring index significance level ratio r in definition front and backj=wj-1/wj,
Front index xj-1With index x belowjWith no less important, rj=1.0；
Front index xj-1Than index x belowjIt is slightly important, rj=1.2；
Front index xj-1Than index x belowjObvious important, rj=1.4；
Front index xj-1Than index x belowjStrong important, rj=1.6；
Front index xj-1Than index x belowjIt is extremely important, rj=1.8；
S23: importance degree minimum index x is acquired35Weight are as follows:
S24: the weight of other 34 indexs are as follows: wj-1=rjwj, j=35,34 ..., 2.
The invention also discloses a kind of railway combined evaluation methods of public welfare, including a kind of any public welfare railway
The determination method of System of Comprehensive Evaluation, after the step S2 further include:
S3: according to it is very well, good, it is generally, poor, very poor qualitative index in microstructure layer index is evaluated, and calculate
The numerical value of quantitative target in microstructure layer index；
S4: determining that the overall merit grade of public welfare railway, overall merit grade include Pyatyi, respectively it is very well, good,
Generally, poor, very poor；
S5: degree of membership of the microstructure layer index about each overall merit grade is calculated:
For qualitative index, qualitative index is 1 about the degree of membership of the overall merit grade consistent with its evaluation of estimate, fixed
Property index about the overall merit grade inconsistent with its evaluation of estimate degree of membership be 0；
For quantitative target, the degree of membership about each overall merit grade is calculated using linear membership function:
Wherein, μ (xj) it is j-th of microstructure layer index xjValue, rJ, iFor j-th of microstructure layer index xjValue μ (xj)
Degree of membership about the i-th class overall merit grade, wherein 1≤i≤5, [Yi, Yi+1) be the i-th class overall merit grade value
Range, [Yi, Yi+1) value be determined by expert according to knowledge and experience；
S6: fuzzy relationship matrix r is determined according to the degree of membership being calculated；
S7: fuzzy overall evaluation matrix B is determined；
S8: according to maximum membership grade principle, the railway combined opinion rating of public welfare is determined.
Compared with prior art, beneficial effects of the present invention:
The present invention provides a kind of index system for the railway combined evaluation of public welfare and determines method, and providing one kind includes
5 macro-indicators, the railway combined assessment indicator system of public welfare that index and 35 Microscopic Indexes are seen in 35 and evaluation determine
Method；The present invention, which efficiently solves the prior art, can not carry out that the railway combined evaluation of public welfare, index system is not comprehensive enough, index
Practicability is not high enough, the problems such as relying primarily on expert's qualitative analysis in poor operability and traditional method；The present invention realizes
The fuzzy overall evaluation of public welfare railway quantitative target and qualitative index embodies the high feature of public welfare railway social benefit,
Public welfare Railway Sustainable Development requirement is met, the blank of the railway combined assessment technique of public welfare has been filled up.
Detailed description of the invention:
Fig. 1 is a kind of process signal of the determination method of the railway combined assessment indicator system of public welfare of the present invention
Figure.
Fig. 2 is a kind of flow diagram of the railway combined evaluation method of public welfare of the present invention.
Specific embodiment
Below with reference to test example and specific embodiment, the present invention is described in further detail.But this should not be understood
It is all that this is belonged to based on the technology that the content of present invention is realized for the scope of the above subject matter of the present invention is limited to the following embodiments
The range of invention.
Embodiment 1
As shown in Figure 1, a kind of determination method of the railway combined assessment indicator system of public welfare, which is characterized in that including with
Lower step:
S1: building the railway combined evaluation of public welfare target layers structure, the target layers structure include Macro, in
See layer and microstructure layer；
The Macro includes five strategic importance, society and politics, social environment, natural environment and other factors indexs；
The middle sight layer include national strategy, regional strategy, local strategy, national defense construction, social stability, national unity,
National economic profit, financial benefit drive Regional Economic Development, employment effects, accurate poverty alleviation, improve the income of residents, to correlation
The induced effect of industry, speeds up urbanization, advances science at the development for promoting the developments of resources such as mineral products, promoting regional tourism
The development of education, the development for promoting ideology and culture, the development for promoting health care, raising quality of residents'life, promotion area are comprehensive
Competitiveness is closed, atmosphere pollution, energy consumption, ploughs and herds the land seizures such as woods, water and soil conservation, influence of noise, the shadow to drinking water source
Sound, the influence to natural scenic spot, ecological safety guarantee, improves disaster assistance ability, improves railway at the influence to wild animal
Road network layout improves overall transportation system, the opinion of local government, the opinion of subjective reflection, amounts to 35 indexs；
The microstructure layer includes that the national strategy goodness of fit, the regional strategy goodness of fit, the strategic goodness of fit in place, national security change
Kind degree, social stability improve degree, national exchange and integration enhancing degree, economic internal rate of return (EIRR), financial internal rate of return (FIRR),
GDP GDP incrementss, every kilometer of drive employment volume, population below the poverty line slip speed-raising amount, resident average per capita disposable
Income increase coefficient, every kilometer of relevant enterprise accelerate, development of resources coefficient, every kilometer of annual tourist arrivals' increment, every
The annual urban population increment of kilometer, education of science develop raising degree, advanced idea cultural spreading improves degree, health care
Cause improves degree, Engel coefficient, synthesized competitiveness and improves the gas emissions, electric power coal oil such as degree, carbon dioxide
Areas occupied, soil erosion area, noise figure, wastewater discharge, the wild animals and plants such as equal consumptions, arable land grazing forest land influence
Coefficient, natural scenic spots influence coefficient, ecological safety degree of protection, rescue personnel and goods and materials shipping time or scale, railway road network
It is laid out improvement degree, overall transportation system improves degree, governmental support degree, resident's support, total 35 indexs.
The target layers structure for constructing the railway combined evaluation of public welfare formed is as shown in table 1 below:
The target layers structure of the railway combined evaluation of 1 public welfare of table
S2: the weight of each microstructure layer index in target layers structure is determined；
Using G1 method calculate each microstructure layer index weight the following steps are included:
S21: according to importance degree descending sort, the microstructure layer index after sequence is respectively X=(x1, x2... x35),
The weight for defining each index is respectively W=(w1, w2... w35)；
S22: the two neighboring index significance level ratio r in definition front and backj=wj-1/wj,
Front index xj-1With index x belowjWith no less important, rj=1.0；
Front index xj-1Than index x belowjIt is slightly important, rj=1.2；
Front index xj-1Than index x belowjObvious important, rj=1.4；
Front index xj-1Than index x belowjStrong important, rj=1.6；
Front index xj-1Than index x belowjIt is extremely important, rj=1.8；
S23: importance degree minimum index x is acquired35Weight are as follows:
S24: the weight of other 34 indexs are as follows: wj-1=rjwj, j=35,34 ..., 2.
Below by taking a certain section of Sichuan-Tibet railway as an example, invention is further explained:
By taking 14 indexs in target layers structure as an example, weight calculation is carried out, calculated result is as shown in table 2 below:
2 Sichuan-Tibet railway evaluation criterion weight of table
| Middle sight layer index | Microstructure layer index | Index weights |
| National strategy | The national strategy goodness of fit | 0.211 |
| National defense construction | National security improves degree | 0.150 |
| Social stability | Social stability improves degree | 0.125 |
| National unity | Nationality's exchange, fusion enhancing degree | 0.104 |
| Accurate poverty alleviation | Population below the poverty line slip speed-raising amount | 0.087 |
| Ecological safety guarantee | Ecological safety degree of protection | 0.073 |
| Drive Regional Economic Development | GDP GDP incrementss | 0.061 |
| Overall transportation system | Overall transportation system improves degree | 0.051 |
| Drive related industry development | Every kilometer of relevant enterprise is accelerated | 0.036 |
| Promote tourism | Every kilometer of annual tourist arrivals' increment | 0.030 |
| Employment effects | Every kilometer of drive employment volume | 0.025 |
| It speeds up urbanization | Urban population growth factor | 0.021 |
| National economic profit | Economic internal rate of return (EIRR) | 0.015 |
| Financial benefit | Financial internal rate of return (FIRR) | 0.012 |
Embodiment 2
As shown in Fig. 2, a kind of railway combined evaluation method of public welfare, including a kind of public welfare railway described in embodiment 1
The determination method of System of Comprehensive Evaluation, after the step S2 further include:
S3: according to it is very well, good, it is generally, poor, very poor qualitative index in microstructure layer index is evaluated, and calculate
The numerical value of quantitative target in microstructure layer index；
S4: determining that the overall merit grade of public welfare railway, overall merit grade include Pyatyi, respectively it is very well, good,
Generally, poor, very poor；
S5: degree of membership of the microstructure layer index about each overall merit grade is calculated:
For qualitative index, qualitative index is 1 about the degree of membership of the overall merit grade consistent with its evaluation of estimate, fixed
Property index about the overall merit grade inconsistent with its evaluation of estimate degree of membership be 0；
For quantitative target, the degree of membership about each overall merit grade is calculated using linear membership function:
Wherein, μ (xj) it is j-th of microstructure layer index xjValue, rJ, iFor j-th of microstructure layer index xjValue μ (xj)
Degree of membership about the i-th class overall merit grade, wherein 1≤i≤5, [Yi, Yi+1) be the i-th class overall merit grade value
Range, [Yi, Yi+1) value be determined by expert according to knowledge and experience；
S6: fuzzy relationship matrix r is determined according to the degree of membership being calculated；
S7: fuzzy overall evaluation matrix B is determined；
S8: according to maximum membership grade principle, the railway combined opinion rating of public welfare is determined.
Below by taking a certain section of Sichuan-Tibet railway as an example, invention is further explained:
By taking 14 indexs in target layers structure as an example, assignment calculating is carried out, assigned result is as shown in table 3 below:
3 Sichuan-Tibet railway public welfare evaluation index value of table
| Microstructure layer index | Index weights | Index value |
| The national strategy goodness of fit | 0.211 | Very well |
| National security improves degree | 0.150 | It is good |
| Social stability improves degree | 0.125 | Very well |
| Nationality's exchange, fusion enhancing degree | 0.104 | Very well |
| Population below the poverty line slip speed-raising amount | 0.087 | 47.5% |
| Ecological safety degree of protection | 0.073 | Very well |
| GDP GDP incrementss | 0.061 | 2.36% |
| Overall transportation system improves degree | 0.051 | It is good |
| Every kilometer of relevant enterprise is accelerated | 0.036 | 4 |
| Every kilometer of annual tourist arrivals' increment | 0.030 | 2882.4 people |
| Every kilometer of drive employment volume | 0.025 | 105 people |
| Every kilometer of annual urban population increment | 0.021 | 46.73 people |
| Economic internal rate of return (EIRR) | 0.015 | 9.42% |
| Financial internal rate of return (FIRR) | 0.012 | - 4.12% |
The fuzzy relationship matrix r being calculated are as follows:
Fuzzy overall evaluation matrix B=[0.5130 0.2981 0.1193 0.0403 0.0120].
Therefore, according to maximum membership grade principle, the railway combined opinion rating of public welfare of a certain section of Sichuan-Tibet railway is determined
For " fine ".
Above embodiments are only to illustrate the present invention and not limit the technical scheme described by the invention, although this explanation
The present invention has been described in detail referring to above-mentioned each embodiment for book, but the present invention is not limited to above-mentioned specific implementation
Mode, therefore any couple of present invention modifies or equivalent replacement；And the technical side of all spirit and scope for not departing from invention
Case and its improvement, are intended to be within the scope of the claims of the invention.
Claims (4)
1. a kind of determination method of the railway combined assessment indicator system of public welfare, which comprises the following steps:
S1: the target layers structure of the building railway combined evaluation of public welfare, the target layers structure includes Macro, middle sight layer
And microstructure layer；
The Macro includes five strategic importance, society and politics, social environment, natural environment and other factors indexs；
The middle sight layer includes national strategy, regional strategy, local strategy, national defense construction, social stability, national unity, its people
Economic benefit, financial benefit drive Regional Economic Development, employment effects, accurate poverty alleviation, improve the income of residents, to related industry
Induced effect, promote the developments of resources such as mineral products, promote regional tourism development, speed up urbanization, advance science education
Development, promote ideology and culture development, promote health care development, improve quality of residents'life, promoted areas comprehensive it is competing
Power is striven, atmosphere pollution, energy consumption, ploughs and herds land seizures such as woods, water and soil conservation, influence of noise, the influence to drinking water source, right
The influence of wild animal, ecological safety guarantee, improves disaster assistance ability, improves railway road network at the influence to natural scenic spot
Layout improves overall transportation system, the opinion of local government, the opinion of subjective reflection, amounts to 35 indexs；
The microstructure layer includes the national strategy goodness of fit, the regional strategy goodness of fit, the strategic goodness of fit in place, national security improvement journey
Degree, social stability improve degree, national exchange and integration enhances degree, economic internal rate of return (EIRR), financial internal rate of return (FIRR), the country
Total output value GDP incrementss, every kilometer of drive employment volume, population below the poverty line slip speed-raising amount, resident's per capita disposable income
Growth factor, every kilometer of relevant enterprise accelerate, development of resources coefficient, every kilometer of annual tourist arrivals' increment, every kilometer
Annual urban population increment, education of science develop raising degree, advanced idea cultural spreading improves degree, medical and health care system
Improvement degree, Engel coefficient, synthesized competitiveness improve gas emissions, the electric power coal oils such as degree, carbon dioxide etc. and disappear
Areas occupied, soil erosion area, noise figure, wastewater discharge, the wild animals and plants such as consumption, arable land grazing forest land influence system
Number, natural scenic spots influence coefficient, ecological safety degree of protection, rescue personnel and goods and materials shipping time or scale, railway road network cloth
Office improves degree, overall transportation system improves degree, governmental support degree, resident's support, amounts to 35 indexs；
S2: the weight of each microstructure layer index in target layers structure is determined.
2. a kind of determination method of the railway combined assessment indicator system of public welfare according to claim 1, which is characterized in that
In the step S2, the weight of each microstructure layer index is calculated using G1 method.
3. a kind of determination method of the railway combined assessment indicator system of public welfare according to claim 2, which is characterized in that
Using G1 method calculate each microstructure layer index weight the following steps are included:
S21: according to importance degree descending sort, the microstructure layer index after sequence is respectively X=(x1, x2... x35), definition is every
The weight of a index is respectively W=(w1, w2... w35)；
S22: the two neighboring index significance level ratio r in definition front and backj=wj-1/wj,
Front index xj-1With index x belowjWith no less important, rj=1.0；
Front index xj-1Than index x belowjIt is slightly important, rj=1.2；
Front index xj-1Than index x belowjObvious important, rj=1.4；
Front index xj-1Than index x belowjStrong important, rj=1.6；
Front index xj-1Than index x belowjIt is extremely important, rj=1.8；
S23: importance degree minimum index x is acquired35Weight are as follows:
S24: the weight of other 34 indexs are as follows: wj-1=rjwj, j=35,34 ..., 2.
4. a kind of railway combined evaluation method of public welfare, which is characterized in that including a kind of public affairs a method according to any one of claims 1-3
The determination method of the railway combined assessment indicator system of benefit, after the step S2 further include:
S3: according to it is very well, good, it is generally, poor, very poor qualitative index in microstructure layer index is evaluated, and calculate microcosmic
The numerical value of quantitative target in layer index；
S4: determining that the overall merit grade of public welfare railway, overall merit grade include Pyatyi, respectively it is very well, good, generally,
Difference, very poor；
S5: degree of membership of the microstructure layer index about each overall merit grade is calculated:
For qualitative index, qualitative index is 1 about the degree of membership of the overall merit grade consistent with its evaluation of estimate, qualitative finger
Marking about the degree of membership of the overall merit grade inconsistent with its evaluation of estimate is 0；
For quantitative target, the degree of membership about each overall merit grade is calculated using linear membership function:
Wherein, μ (xj) it is j-th of microstructure layer index xjValue, rJ, iFor j-th of microstructure layer index xjValue μ (xj) about
The degree of membership of i class overall merit grade, wherein 1≤i≤5, [Yi, Yi+1) be the i-th class overall merit grade value range,
[Yi, Yi+1) value be determined by expert according to knowledge and experience；
S6: fuzzy relationship matrix r is determined according to the degree of membership being calculated；
S7: fuzzy overall evaluation matrix B is determined；
S8: according to maximum membership grade principle, the railway combined opinion rating of public welfare is determined.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201910416679.5A CN110119902A (en) | 2019-05-17 | 2019-05-17 | A kind of determination method of the railway combined assessment indicator system of public welfare |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201910416679.5A CN110119902A (en) | 2019-05-17 | 2019-05-17 | A kind of determination method of the railway combined assessment indicator system of public welfare |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN110119902A true CN110119902A (en) | 2019-08-13 |
Family
ID=67522795
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201910416679.5A Pending CN110119902A (en) | 2019-05-17 | 2019-05-17 | A kind of determination method of the railway combined assessment indicator system of public welfare |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN110119902A (en) |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN117035565A (en) * | 2023-10-10 | 2023-11-10 | 之江实验室 | Community service management method, device, equipment and storage medium |
-
2019
- 2019-05-17 CN CN201910416679.5A patent/CN110119902A/en active Pending
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN117035565A (en) * | 2023-10-10 | 2023-11-10 | 之江实验室 | Community service management method, device, equipment and storage medium |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Zhang et al. | A trade-off approach of optimal land allocation between socio-economic development and ecological stability | |
| Richmond-Bryant et al. | Disparities in distribution of particulate matter emissions from US coal-fired power plants by race and poverty status after accounting for reductions in operations between 2015 and 2017 | |
| He et al. | A “load-carrier” perspective approach for assessing tourism resource carrying capacity | |
| Shane et al. | Urban environmental sustainability metrics: a provisional set | |
| Yang et al. | Assessment of urban resilience based on the transformation of resource-based cities: a case study of Panzhihua, China. | |
| Azwar et al. | Model of sustainable urban infrastructure at coastal reclamation of North Jakarta | |
| Hanafi et al. | Essential entities towards developing an adaptive reuse model for organization management in conservation of heritage buildings in Malaysia | |
| CN110119902A (en) | A kind of determination method of the railway combined assessment indicator system of public welfare | |
| Hnatkovych et al. | Modern approaches to Ukraine's regional development management | |
| Ching et al. | Sustainable ecotourism development strategies through strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats analysis: The case of Cameron Highlands, Malaysia | |
| Yukhnovskyi et al. | Dynamics of ecological stability of small towns in Kyiv region | |
| Towers | GIS versus the community: Siting power in southern West Virginia | |
| Bano et al. | Livelihood expansion and local people’s expectations in the realm of China-Pakistan economic corridor in Hunza, Gilgit Baltistan, Pakistan | |
| Capello | Urban returns to scale and environmental resources: an estimate of environmental externalities in an urban production function | |
| Olgun et al. | A'wot method in determination of sustainable strategic objectives towards open green areas in the medium sized cities: The case of Nigde, Turkey | |
| Berawi et al. | Improving regional development through aerotropolis conceptual design | |
| Gunawan et al. | Developing ‘green’labour in Indonesia: What is the current state of play? | |
| Thérivel | Environmental appraisal of development plans in practice | |
| Labolo et al. | Determinant factor of central government relocation in Palangkaraya, Central Kalimantan Province | |
| Kabanov | Principles of deploying the objects of social and transport infrastructure in regional strategic planning documents | |
| Meligrana et al. | Planning a mega-city's future: An evaluation of Shanghai's municipal land-use plan | |
| TODOROVIĆ | New aspects of sustainable development as a factor of competitiveness in the EU | |
| Sennuga et al. | Exploring the Economic and Social Impacts of Rural-Urban Migration of Youths in Abuja, Nigeria | |
| Wiangnon et al. | Affected Factors for Solid Waste Management in the Upstream of Watershed and Touristic Area using Analytic Hierarchy Process. A Case Study of Pai District, Thailand | |
| Hojas Hojas et al. | Application of standard indicators for the quantification of sdgs in the environmental assessment of civil engineering projects |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |
Application publication date: 20190813 |
|
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |