CN110110999A - System event HRA evaluation method, device, equipment and medium in master-control room of nuclear power plant - Google Patents

Abstract

The present application discloses an HRA evaluation method, device, equipment and medium for system events in the main control room of a nuclear power plant. The method includes: identifying a cut-set sequence that causes human error events; determining human behavior units in the cut-set sequence; collecting Personnel manipulation information corresponding to the personnel behavior unit; record the manipulative behavior information related to human error events in the personnel manipulation information according to the time sequence, and obtain the corresponding information related to the operation error behavior; use the information related to the operation error behavior to manipulate the operator Conduct behavior analysis to obtain the first behavior forming factor related to the event scene and the second behavior forming factor related to personnel cognition; using the first behavior forming factor and the second behavior forming factor, the system in the main control room of the nuclear power plant is analyzed The events are evaluated by HRA, and the corresponding HRA analysis results used to characterize the operation state of the nuclear power plant are obtained. The present application can realize a more objective and accurate HRA evaluation of system events in the main control room of a nuclear power plant.

Description

HRA evaluation method, device, equipment and medium for system event in main control room of nuclear power plant

technical field

The present application relates to the field of nuclear power technology, in particular to a human reliability analysis (HRA) evaluation method, device, equipment and medium for system events in the main control room of a nuclear power plant.

Background technique

As a kind of clean energy, nuclear power has been applied in many countries and regions around the world, and has broad application prospects.

However, in the process of producing nuclear power, nuclear power plants need to face nuclear safety issues that other power generation methods do not have. Therefore, the evaluation and analysis of the operation process of the nuclear power plant system is an important link to determine whether the operation of the nuclear power plant is safe, and how to achieve a more objective and accurate evaluation and analysis of the nuclear power plant system is a problem that people are very concerned about.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In view of this, the purpose of this application is to provide a method, device, equipment and medium for HRA evaluation of system events in the main control room of a nuclear power plant, which can achieve more objective and accurate HRA evaluation of system events in the main control room of a nuclear power plant. Its specific plan is as follows:

In a first aspect, the present application discloses an HRA evaluation method for system events in the main control room of a nuclear power plant, including:

Taking the human error event in the event tree of system events in the main control room of the nuclear power plant as the top event, to identify the cut set sequence that caused the human error event, and the cut set sequence includes at least one human behavior unit;

determining the personnel behavior unit in the cut set sequence;

collecting personnel manipulation information corresponding to the personnel behavior unit, where the personnel manipulation information includes operation behavior information of the operator performing the manipulation behavior;

Record the manipulation behavior information related to the human error event in the personnel manipulation information according to the time sequence, and obtain the corresponding manipulation error behavior related information;

The manipulation behavior of the operator is analyzed by using the information related to the manipulation error behavior, so as to obtain a first behavior forming factor and a second behavior forming factor, and the first behavior forming factor is related to the human error event. The event occurrence scene is related, and the second behavior forming factor is related to the operator's human cognition

Using the first behavior forming factor and the second behavior forming factor, perform HRA evaluation on the system events in the main control room of the nuclear power plant, and obtain corresponding HRA analysis results for characterizing the operating state of the nuclear power plant.

Optionally, the recording of the manipulation behavior information related to the human error event in the personnel manipulation information according to the time sequence includes:

The operation behavior information of the negligent error and the execution error related to the human error event in the human manipulation information are respectively recorded according to the time sequence.

Optionally, the recording of the manipulation behavior information related to the human error event in the personnel manipulation information according to the time sequence includes:

The manipulation behavior information related to the human error event in the personnel manipulation information is recorded in the form of table recording and according to the time sequence.

Optionally, the first behavior forming factor includes an intentional behavior forming factor caused by behavior intention and an environmental behavior forming factor caused by the current environment;

The second behavior formation factors include effect behavior formation factors caused by recency effects and game behavior formation factors caused by frequency games.

In a second aspect, the present application discloses an HRA evaluation device for system events in the main control room of a nuclear power plant, including:

The cut set sequence identification module is used for taking the human error event in the event tree of the system events in the main control room of the nuclear power plant as the top event, so as to identify the cut set sequence that caused the human error event, in the cut set sequence Include at least one Personnel Conduct Unit;

a behavior unit determination module, configured to determine the personnel behavior units in the cut set sequence;

a manipulation information collection module, configured to collect personnel manipulation information corresponding to the personnel behavior unit, where the personnel manipulation information includes the operation behavior information of the operator performing the manipulation behavior;

The error behavior related information recording module is used to record the operation behavior information related to the human error event in the personnel manipulation information according to the time sequence, so as to obtain the corresponding manipulation error behavior related information;

A manipulation behavior analysis module, configured to analyze the manipulation behavior of the operator by using the information related to the manipulation error behavior to obtain a first behavior forming factor and a second behavior forming factor, the first behavior forming factor and the The event occurrence scene of the human error event is related, and the second behavior forming factor is related to the human cognition of the operator;

The HRA evaluation module is configured to use the first behavior forming factor and the second behavior forming factor to perform HRA evaluation on the system events in the main control room of the nuclear power plant, and obtain a corresponding HRA analysis for characterizing the operating state of the nuclear power plant result.

Optionally, the error behavior related information recording module is specifically configured to record the operation behavior information of the negligent error and the execution error related to the human error event in the personnel manipulation information respectively according to the time sequence.

Optionally, the erroneous behavior-related information recording module is specifically configured to record the human error-related information related to the human error event in the personnel manipulation information according to the time sequence in the form of table recording.

Optionally, the first behavior forming factor includes an intentional behavior forming factor caused by behavior intention and an environmental behavior forming factor caused by the current environment;

The second behavior formation factors include effect behavior formation factors caused by recency effects and game behavior formation factors caused by frequency games.

In a third aspect, the present application discloses an HRA evaluation device for system events in the main control room of a nuclear power plant, including:

memory for storing computer programs;

The processor is configured to execute the computer program to implement the HRA evaluation method for system events in the main control room of the nuclear power plant disclosed in the foregoing embodiments.

In a fourth aspect, the present application discloses a computer-readable storage medium for storing a computer program, wherein when the computer program is executed by a processor, the HRA evaluation method for system events in the main control room of a nuclear power plant disclosed in the foregoing embodiments is implemented.

It can be seen that this application first takes the human error event in the time tree of system events in the main control room of the nuclear power plant as the top event of the event tree to determine the cut set sequence that may cause human error events, and then determines the cut set sequence in the cut set sequence. and collect the personnel manipulation information corresponding to the personnel behavior unit, and then record the information related to the personnel error in the above-mentioned personnel operation information to obtain the information related to the manipulation error behavior, and then use the above-mentioned information related to the manipulation error behavior to analyze From the operator's manipulation behavior, the first behavior forming factor related to the scene of the event and the second behavior forming factor related to personnel cognition are obtained. Finally, the above two behavior forming factors are used to carry out HRA analysis on the system events in the main control room of the nuclear power plant. . It can be seen that the present application is equivalent to first determining the behavior units that may cause human error events according to the initial symptoms of the accident, and then collecting the personnel manipulation information corresponding to the above behavior units. This is equivalent to using the task analysis method to collect personnel manipulation Compared with the existing manipulation information collected based on the time window, the collected manipulating information can be more in line with the actual situation of the operator's manipulation in the main control room, which is conducive to improving the objectivity and efficiency of subsequent HRA evaluation results. Accuracy, in addition, because the present application analyzes the operator's manipulation behavior by using the above-mentioned information related to the manipulation error behavior, it analyzes from the two dimensions of the event occurrence scene and personnel cognition, so as to obtain the relevant event occurrence scene. In this way, in the subsequent HRA evaluation of system events in the main control room of the nuclear power plant, in addition to the above-mentioned behavioral factors related to the event occurrence scenario, the above-mentioned behavioral forming factors can also be used. The behavior forming factors related to personnel cognition can make the final HRA evaluation result more objective and accurate, more in line with the actual operating conditions of the nuclear power plant, and thus help to improve the safety of the nuclear power plant. In conclusion, the present application can realize a more objective and accurate HRA evaluation of system events in the main control room of a nuclear power plant.

Description of drawings

In order to more clearly illustrate the embodiments of the present application or the technical solutions in the prior art, the following briefly introduces the accompanying drawings required for the description of the embodiments or the prior art. Obviously, the drawings in the following description are only It is an embodiment of the present application. For those of ordinary skill in the art, other drawings can also be obtained according to the provided drawings without any creative effort.

FIG. 1 is a flowchart of a method for evaluating HRA of system events in the main control room of a nuclear power plant disclosed in the application;

2 is a flowchart of a specific HRA evaluation method for system events in the main control room of a nuclear power plant disclosed in the present application;

FIG. 3 is a schematic structural diagram of an HRA evaluation device for system events in the main control room of a nuclear power plant disclosed in the present application.

Detailed ways

The technical solutions in the embodiments of the present application will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the drawings in the embodiments of the present application. Obviously, the described embodiments are only a part of the embodiments of the present application, but not all of the embodiments. Based on the embodiments in the present application, all other embodiments obtained by those of ordinary skill in the art without creative efforts shall fall within the protection scope of the present application.

First, the specific application scenarios of the HRA evaluation method for system events in the main control room of the nuclear power plant of the application are introduced. A systematic approach to evaluation, PRA targets the systems, personnel and human-machine interfaces that operate a nuclear power plant. Since the nuclear power plant is operated by personnel, the criterion for judging the success or failure of the system event in the system of the nuclear power plant is whether the behavior of the personnel satisfies or how likely it is to satisfy the success criterion of the system event.

Personnel behaviors are divided into personnel behaviors under normal operating conditions of nuclear power plants and personnel behaviors under abnormal conditions. The personnel behavior in abnormal state is divided into two situations, one is the personnel behavior after the accident of the nuclear power plant, and the other is the personnel behavior after the transient state of the nuclear power plant. The method of analyzing the operation process and correctness of personnel behavior is the HRA method.

However, whether the existing HRA method adopts the A Technique for Human Event Analysis (ATHEANA) method or the Human Cognitive Reliability (HCR) method, it is not fully apparent when the accident occurs. , the operator can not predict and determine what kind of accident happened, these methods using time window can not fully reflect the actual situation of the operator's operation.

Therefore, in order to solve the above problems existing in the existing HRA method, the present application constructs a systematic research method for analyzing the behavior of personnel in abnormal state based on the research of the existing HRA method. Specifically, the HRA evaluation method, device, equipment and medium of the present application for system events in the main control room of a nuclear power plant will be described respectively through the following embodiments.

Referring to FIG. 1 , the embodiment of the present application discloses a method for evaluating HRA of system events in the main control room of a nuclear power plant, including:

Step S11: Take the human error event in the event tree of the system events in the main control room of the nuclear power plant as the top event to identify the cut set sequence that caused the human error event, and the cut set sequence includes at least one human behavior unit.

Step S12: Determine the personnel behavior units in the cut set sequence.

Step S13 : collect personnel manipulation information corresponding to the personnel behavior unit, where the personnel manipulation information includes operation behavior information of the operator performing the manipulation behavior.

For example, the manipulation equipment information corresponding to each personnel behavior unit, the manipulation behavior information, the limit value that can be manipulated, the position indicated by the equipment, the operator performance, etc. can be collected.

Step S14: Record the operation behavior information related to the human error event in the personnel manipulation information according to the time sequence, and obtain the corresponding information related to the manipulation error behavior.

In this embodiment, after collecting various kinds of personnel manipulation information, it is also necessary to record the operation behavior information related to the human error event in the personnel manipulation information, and it can be recorded sequentially by means of time series recording. Various information related to human error.

In this embodiment, the human error may specifically include negligence-type errors and execution-type errors, that is, in this embodiment, the operation behaviors of negligence-type errors and execution-type errors related to human error events in the personnel manipulation information can be respectively analyzed according to the time sequence. information is recorded.

In addition, in this embodiment, the form of table recording can also be used, and the operation behavior information related to the human error event in the personnel operation information can be recorded according to the time sequence.

Step S15 : analyzing the manipulation behavior of the operator by using the information related to the manipulation error behavior to obtain a first behavior forming factor and a second behavior forming factor, the first behavior forming factor and the human error event The event occurrence scene is related to the event occurrence scene, and the second behavior forming factor is related to the human cognition of the operator.

In this embodiment, when analyzing the operator's manipulation behavior by using the above-mentioned information related to the manipulation error behavior, the analysis is performed from the perspectives of the event occurrence scene and personnel cognition, thereby obtaining the event occurrence scene related information. The first behavioral shaper and the second behavioral shaper related to person cognition. That is, this embodiment specifically analyzes the manipulation behavior of the operator based on the scene mode trigger and the cognitive mode trigger.

Further, the first behavior forming factor in this embodiment may specifically include an intention behavior forming factor (ie, PSF, Performance Shaping Factor) caused by behavior intention and an environmental behavior forming factor caused by the current environment;

In addition, the second behavior formation factor in this embodiment may specifically include an effect behavior formation factor caused by a recency effect and a game behavior formation factor caused by a frequency game.

Among them, the recency effect considers the daily practice PSF of the personnel. The closer the training time, the higher the corresponding PSF value. The frequency game considers the operator's training level PSF. The higher the training level, the higher the frequency game cognitive schema. The higher the trigger probability.

Step S16: Using the first behavior forming factor and the second behavior forming factor, perform HRA evaluation on the system events in the main control room of the nuclear power plant, and obtain corresponding HRA analysis results for characterizing the operating state of the nuclear power plant.

That is, in this embodiment, the HRA evaluation is performed on the system events in the main control of the nuclear power plant by using the behavior forming factors related to the event occurrence scene and the behavior forming factors related to personnel cognition, so that the final HRA evaluation result can be more accurate. It is objective and accurate, more in line with the actual operating conditions of the nuclear power plant, thereby helping to improve the safety of the nuclear power plant.

To sum up, it can be seen that the embodiment of the present application is equivalent to firstly determining the behavioral units that may cause human error events according to the initial symptoms of the accident, and then collecting the personnel manipulation information corresponding to the above-mentioned behavioral units. The method of manipulating information can make the collected manipulating information more in line with the actual situation of operator manipulation in the main control room than the existing manipulating information collected based on time windows, which is beneficial to improve the objectiveness of subsequent HRA evaluation results. In addition, because the embodiment of the present application uses the above-mentioned information related to the manipulation error behavior to analyze the manipulation behavior of the operator, it is analyzed from the two dimensions of the event occurrence scene and the personnel cognition, so as to obtain the The behavior forming factors related to the event occurrence scene and the behavior forming factors related to personnel cognition, so that in the subsequent HRA evaluation of the system events in the main control room of the nuclear power plant, in addition to the above behavior forming factors related to the event occurrence scene, the behavior forming factors can be used. The above-mentioned behavior forming factors related to personnel cognition can also be used, so that the final HRA evaluation result can be more objective and accurate, and more in line with the actual operating conditions of the nuclear power plant, thereby helping to improve the safety of the nuclear power plant. In conclusion, the embodiments of the present application can realize a more objective and accurate HRA evaluation of system events in the main control room of a nuclear power plant.

Referring to Fig. 2, the embodiment of the present application discloses a specific HRA evaluation method for system events in the main control room of a nuclear power plant, including:

Step S21: Take the human error event in the event tree of the system events in the main control room of the nuclear power plant as the top event to identify the cut set sequence that causes the human error event, and the cut set sequence includes at least one human behavior unit.

Step S22: Determine the personnel behavior units in the cut set sequence.

Step S23 : Collect personnel manipulation information corresponding to the personnel behavior unit, where the personnel manipulation information includes operation behavior information of the operator performing the manipulation behavior.

Step S24: Record the operation behavior information of negligent errors and execution errors related to the human error event in the personnel manipulation information according to the time sequence in the form of table recording, and obtain the corresponding manipulation error behaviors. information.

Step S25 : analyzing the manipulation behavior of the operator by using the information related to the manipulation error behavior to obtain a first behavior forming factor and a second behavior forming factor, the first behavior forming factor and the human error event The event occurrence scene is related to the event occurrence scene, and the second behavior forming factor is related to the human cognition of the operator.

Step S26: Using the first behavior forming factor and the second behavior forming factor, perform HRA evaluation on the system events in the main control room of the nuclear power plant, and obtain corresponding HRA analysis results for characterizing the operating state of the nuclear power plant.

Referring to FIG. 3 , the embodiment of the present application further discloses an HRA evaluation device for system events in the main control room of a nuclear power plant, including:

The cut set sequence identification module 11 is used for taking the human error event in the event tree of the system events in the main control room of the nuclear power plant as the top event, so as to identify the cut set sequence causing the human error event, the cut set sequence including at least one personnel conduct unit;

a behavior unit determination module 12, configured to determine the personnel behavior units in the cut set sequence;

The manipulation information collection module 13 is used to collect the personnel manipulation information corresponding to the personnel behavior unit, where the personnel manipulation information includes the operation behavior information of the operator performing the manipulation behavior;

The error behavior related information recording module 14 is used to record the operation behavior information related to the human error event in the personnel manipulation information according to the time sequence, so as to obtain the corresponding manipulation error behavior related information;

The manipulation behavior analysis module 15 is configured to analyze the manipulation behavior of the operator by using the information related to the mishandling behavior, so as to obtain a first behavior forming factor and a second behavior forming factor, the first behavior forming factor and all The event occurrence scene of the human error event is related, and the second behavior forming factor is related to the human cognition of the operator;

The HRA evaluation module 16 is configured to use the first behavior forming factor and the second behavior forming factor to perform HRA evaluation on the system events in the main control room of the nuclear power plant, and obtain a corresponding HRA for characterizing the operating state of the nuclear power plant Analyze the results.

To sum up, it can be seen that the embodiment of the present application is equivalent to firstly determining the behavioral units that may cause human error events according to the initial symptoms of the accident, and then collecting the personnel manipulation information corresponding to the above-mentioned behavioral units. The method of manipulating information can make the collected manipulating information more in line with the actual situation of operator manipulation in the main control room than the existing manipulating information collected based on time windows, which is beneficial to improve the objectiveness of subsequent HRA evaluation results. In addition, because the embodiment of the present application uses the above-mentioned information related to the manipulation error behavior to analyze the manipulation behavior of the operator, it is analyzed from the two dimensions of the event occurrence scene and the personnel cognition, so as to obtain the The behavior forming factors related to the event occurrence scene and the behavior forming factors related to personnel cognition, so that in the subsequent HRA evaluation of the system events in the main control room of the nuclear power plant, in addition to the above behavior forming factors related to the event occurrence scene, the behavior forming factors can be used. The above-mentioned behavior forming factors related to personnel cognition can also be used, so that the final HRA evaluation result can be more objective and accurate, and more in line with the actual operating conditions of the nuclear power plant, thereby helping to improve the safety of the nuclear power plant. In conclusion, the embodiments of the present application can realize a more objective and accurate HRA evaluation of system events in the main control room of a nuclear power plant.

Further, in this embodiment, the erroneous behavior related information recording module is specifically configured to separately record the operation behavior information of negligent errors and execution errors related to the human error event in the personnel manipulation information according to the time sequence. record.

In addition, in this embodiment, the error behavior related information recording module is specifically configured to record the operation behavior information related to the human error event in the personnel manipulation information according to the time sequence in the form of table recording.

Further, in this embodiment, the first behavior forming factor includes an intentional behavior forming factor caused by behavior intention and an environmental behavior forming factor caused by the current environment;

The second behavior formation factors include effect behavior formation factors caused by recency effects and game behavior formation factors caused by frequency games.

Further, the present application also discloses an HRA evaluation device for system events in the main control room of a nuclear power plant, including:

memory for storing computer programs;

The processor is configured to execute the computer program to implement the aforementioned HRA evaluation method for system events in the main control room of the nuclear power plant.

Further, the present application also discloses a computer-readable storage medium for storing a computer program, wherein when the computer program is executed by a processor, the aforementioned HRA evaluation method for system events in the main control room of a nuclear power plant is implemented.

For the specific steps of the above method, reference may be made to the corresponding content disclosed in the foregoing embodiments, which will not be repeated here.

The various embodiments in this specification are described in a progressive manner, and each embodiment focuses on the differences from other embodiments, and the same or similar parts between the various embodiments may be referred to each other. As for the device disclosed in the embodiment, since it corresponds to the method disclosed in the embodiment, the description is relatively simple, and the relevant part can be referred to the description of the method.

The steps of a method or algorithm described in conjunction with the embodiments disclosed herein may be directly implemented in hardware, a software module executed by a processor, or a combination of the two. A software module can be placed in random access memory (RAM), internal memory, read only memory (ROM), electrically programmable ROM, electrically erasable programmable ROM, registers, hard disk, removable disk, CD-ROM, or any other in the technical field. in any other known form of storage medium.

The HRA evaluation method, device, equipment and medium for system events in the main control room of a nuclear power plant provided by the present application have been described in detail above. The principles and implementations of the present application are described with specific examples in this paper. The above examples The description is only used to help understand the method of the present application and its core idea; meanwhile, for those of ordinary skill in the art, according to the idea of the present application, there will be changes in the specific embodiments and application scope. The contents of this specification should not be construed as limiting the application.

Claims (10)

1. system event HRA evaluation method in a kind of master-control room of nuclear power plant characterized by comprising

Using the human-equation error event in the event tree of system event in master-control room of nuclear power plant as top event, cause institute to identify The cut set sequence of human-equation error event is stated, includes at least one human behavior unit in the cut set sequence；

Determine the human behavior unit in the cut set sequence；

Personnel's operation information corresponding with the human behavior unit is acquired, personnel's operation information includes that operator grasps The operation behavior information that stringer is；

According to when ordered pair described in personnel's operation information manipulative behavior information relevant to the human-equation error event record, It obtains manipulating fault behavior relevant information accordingly；

The manipulative behavior of the operator is analyzed using the manipulation fault behavior relevant information, to obtain first The event of behavior formation factor and the second behavior formation factor, first behavior formation factor and the human-equation error event is sent out Raw scene is related, and second behavior formation factor is related to the personnel of operator cognition；

Using first behavior formation factor and second behavior formation factor, to system thing in the master-control room of nuclear power plant Part carries out HRA evaluation, obtains accordingly for characterizing the HRA analysis result of nuclear power plant's operating status.

2. system event HRA evaluation method in master-control room of nuclear power plant according to claim 1, which is characterized in that described to press According to when ordered pair described in personnel's operation information manipulative behavior information relevant to the human-equation error event record, comprising:

Carelessness type relevant to the human-equation error event in personnel's operation information is made mistakes and executed respectively according to timing The operation behavior information of type fault is recorded.

3. system event HRA evaluation method in master-control room of nuclear power plant according to claim 1, which is characterized in that described to press According to when ordered pair described in personnel's operation information operation behavior information relevant to the human-equation error event record, comprising:

By the way of charting, and according to when ordered pair described in personnel's operation information it is relevant to the human-equation error event Manipulative behavior information is recorded.

4. system event HRA evaluation method, feature exist in master-control room of nuclear power plant according to any one of claims 1 to 3 In,

First behavior formation factor, including be intended to behavior formation factor caused by being intended to by behavior and drawn by current environment The environmental behaviour risen forms the factor；

Second behavior formation factor, including the effect behavior formation factor as caused by recency effect and drawn by frequency game The game behavior risen forms the factor.

5. system event HRA evaluating apparatus in a kind of master-control room of nuclear power plant characterized by comprising

Cut set recognition sequence module, for using the human-equation error event in the event tree of system event in master-control room of nuclear power plant as Top event includes at least one personnel in the cut set sequence to identify the cut set sequence for causing the human-equation error event Behavior unit；

Behavior unit determining module, for determining the human behavior unit in the cut set sequence；

Operation information acquisition module, for acquiring personnel's operation information corresponding with the human behavior unit, the personnel behaviour Vertical information includes the operation behavior information that operator carries out manipulative behavior；

Fault behavior relevant information logging modle, for according to when ordered pair described in personnel's operation information with the human-equation error thing The relevant operation behavior information of part is recorded, and obtains manipulating fault behavior relevant information accordingly；

Manipulative behavior analysis module, for using the manipulation fault behavior relevant information to the manipulative behavior of the operator into Row analysis, to obtain the first behavior formation factor and the second behavior formation factor, first behavior formation factor and the people Because the event occurrence scene of fault event is related, second behavior formation factor is related to the personnel of operator cognition；

HRA evaluation module, for utilizing first behavior formation factor and second behavior formation factor, to the nuclear power Factory owner controls indoor heating system event and carries out HRA evaluation, obtains accordingly for characterizing the HRA analysis result of nuclear power plant's operating status.

6. system event HRA evaluating apparatus in master-control room of nuclear power plant according to claim 5, which is characterized in that

The fault behavior relevant information logging modle, be specifically used for according to timing respectively in personnel's operation information with institute The operation behavior information for stating the relevant carelessness type fault of human-equation error event and execution type fault is recorded.

7. system event HRA evaluating apparatus in master-control room of nuclear power plant according to claim 5, which is characterized in that

The fault behavior relevant information logging modle, specifically for by the way of charting, and according to when ordered pair described in Operation behavior information relevant to the human-equation error event records in personnel's operation information.

8. according to system event HRA evaluating apparatus in the described in any item master-control room of nuclear power plant of claim 5 to 7, feature exists In,

First behavior formation factor, including be intended to behavior formation factor caused by being intended to by behavior and drawn by current environment The environmental behaviour risen forms the factor；

Second behavior formation factor, including the effect behavior formation factor as caused by recency effect and drawn by frequency game The game behavior risen forms the factor.

9. system event HRA valuator device in a kind of master-control room of nuclear power plant characterized by comprising

Memory, for storing computer program；

Processor, for executing the computer program, to realize such as the described in any item nuclear power plant's master controls of Claims 1-4 Indoor heating system event HRA evaluation method.

10. a kind of computer readable storage medium, which is characterized in that for storing computer program, wherein the computer journey It is realized when sequence is executed by processor such as the evaluation side system event HRA in the described in any item master-control room of nuclear power plant of Claims 1-4 Method.