CN109991077A - A kind of prediction technique of composite material Mixed-Mode Delamination resistance curve - Google Patents

A kind of prediction technique of composite material Mixed-Mode Delamination resistance curve Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN109991077A
CN109991077A CN201910203909.XA CN201910203909A CN109991077A CN 109991077 A CN109991077 A CN 109991077A CN 201910203909 A CN201910203909 A CN 201910203909A CN 109991077 A CN109991077 A CN 109991077A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
type
delamination
resistance curve
mode
mixed
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
CN201910203909.XA
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN109991077B (en
Inventor
龚愉
姚建尧
刘浩
张建宇
胡宁
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Chongqing University
Original Assignee
Chongqing University
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Chongqing University filed Critical Chongqing University
Priority to CN201910203909.XA priority Critical patent/CN109991077B/en
Publication of CN109991077A publication Critical patent/CN109991077A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN109991077B publication Critical patent/CN109991077B/en
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N3/00Investigating strength properties of solid materials by application of mechanical stress
    • G01N3/08Investigating strength properties of solid materials by application of mechanical stress by applying steady tensile or compressive forces
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N3/00Investigating strength properties of solid materials by application of mechanical stress
    • G01N3/20Investigating strength properties of solid materials by application of mechanical stress by applying steady bending forces
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N2203/00Investigating strength properties of solid materials by application of mechanical stress
    • G01N2203/0014Type of force applied
    • G01N2203/0016Tensile or compressive
    • G01N2203/0019Compressive
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N2203/00Investigating strength properties of solid materials by application of mechanical stress
    • G01N2203/0014Type of force applied
    • G01N2203/0023Bending
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N2203/00Investigating strength properties of solid materials by application of mechanical stress
    • G01N2203/0058Kind of property studied
    • G01N2203/006Crack, flaws, fracture or rupture
    • G01N2203/0067Fracture or rupture
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N2203/00Investigating strength properties of solid materials by application of mechanical stress
    • G01N2203/02Details not specific for a particular testing method
    • G01N2203/06Indicating or recording means; Sensing means
    • G01N2203/067Parameter measured for estimating the property
    • G01N2203/0682Spatial dimension, e.g. length, area, angle

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Immunology (AREA)
  • Pathology (AREA)
  • Investigating Strength Of Materials By Application Of Mechanical Stress (AREA)

Abstract

The present invention relates to a kind of prediction techniques of composite material Mixed-Mode Delamination resistance curve, comprising the following steps: (1) manufactures and designs carbon-fiber-reinforcomposite composite material layer plate sample;(2) I type, II type and the test of I/II Mixed-Mode Delamination are carried out using double cantilever beam, end notches bending and hybrid mode bending apparatus respectively;(3) sample I type, II type and I/II Mixed-Mode Delamination resistance curve are determined;(4) data are fitted using separation resistance curve theory formula, determine fracture toughness initial value, stationary value and the fiber bridge joint length of different layering tests;(5) fracture toughness initial value under different mixing ratios and stationary value are fitted respectively using B-K criterion, obtain guide coefficient ηinitAnd ηprop;(6) a Mixed-Mode Delamination resistance curve predictor formula to load mixing ratio as independent variable is established.The present invention predicts the separation resistance curve of other any mixing ratios, is convenient for engineer application, and can reduce experimentation cost by the delamination fractures toughness test to carbon-fiber-reinforcomposite composite material layer plate specific blend ratio.

Description

A kind of prediction technique of composite material Mixed-Mode Delamination resistance curve
Technical field
The present invention relates to the technical fields of fibre reinforced composites Mixed-Mode Delamination resistance curve prediction, and in particular to one The prediction technique of the kind any mixing ratio lower leaf Fracture Toughness of carbon-fiber-reinforcomposite composite material layer plate.
Background technique
Carbon fibre reinforced composite is widely used in the fields such as aerospace reality due to high specific strength and specific stiffness Existing structural weight reduction and raising fuel efficiency.Veneer structure is engineering more common configuration in practice, since performance is far low outside face In performance in face, easily generation delamination damage.Under the appearance and extension of delamination damage will cause structural strength and rigidity significant Drop, or even cause the catastrophic failure for having no omen, these all seriously constrain the application of composite material in practical projects. Composite structure will realize damage tolerance design, it is necessary to obtain accurate composite material interlaminar fracture toughness data for point The prediction of layer propagation behavior and structural strength.
I/II Mixed-Mode Delamination is the common delamination damage form of practical structures.During delamination, a rear is split Fiber bridge joint phenomenon to occur, the fiber of bridge joint bears load and reduces the local stress for splitting point.This toughening mechanism causes point Fault rupture toughness increases with the increase of layering length, i.e. separation resistance curve.Three key parameters of separation resistance curve are Fracture toughness initial value, fracture toughness stationary value and fiber bridge joint length.It goes in order to which exact representation I/II Mixed-Mode Delamination extends To need to obtain separation resistance curve.
Existing a large number of experiments is research shows that load mixing ratio influences significantly On Fracture Toughness of Laminated Composites.Layering can It can occur under any mixing ratio, the fracture of composite materials toughness under all mixing ratios of measuring will expend biggish experiment Resource, it is also not possible to pass through the exhaustive all situations being likely to occur of laboratory facilities.By measuring limited, particular load mixing Delamination fractures toughness than under, it is ideal for establishing and the theoretical model of interlaminar fracture toughness under other load mixing ratios can be predicted Selection.Therefore, it is necessary to establish the Mixed-Mode Delamination resistance curve prediction model for being convenient for engineer application.
Summary of the invention
The technical problem to be solved in the present invention are as follows: a kind of side for predicting composite material Mixed-Mode Delamination resistance curve is provided Method.What is proposed is public as the theory of the carbon-fiber-reinforcomposite composite material layer plate Mixed-Mode Delamination resistance curve of independent variable using mixing ratio Formula, using carbon-fiber-reinforcomposite composite material layer plate I type, the interlaminar fracture toughness test result of II type and finite mixtures than under, It predicts the carbon-fiber-reinforcomposite composite material layer plate separation resistance curve under any mixing ratio, therefore can significantly shorten test week Phase reduces experimentation cost.
The present invention solves the technical solution that above-mentioned technical problem uses are as follows: a kind of composite material Mixed-Mode Delamination resistance curve Prediction technique, comprising the following steps:
Step 1, manufacture and design the carbon-fiber-reinforcomposite composite material layer plate sample with+22.5 °/- 22.5 ° layering interfaces;
Step 2, to said sample, distinguished using double cantilever beam, end notches bending and hybrid mode bend test device Carry out I type, II type and the test of I/II Mixed-Mode Delamination, wherein the load mixing ratio of Mixed-Mode Delamination test is 0.25,0.5 and 0.75;
Step 3, load, displacement and layering length are obtained by experiment, determines the I type, II type and I/II mixed type of sample Separation resistance curve;
Step 4, data are fitted using separation resistance curve theory formula, determine that the fracture of different layering tests is tough Property initial value, stationary value and fiber bridge joint length;
Step 5, broken using B-K delamination criterion to (0.25,0.5 and 0.75) under I type, II type and different mixing ratios It splits toughness initial value to be fitted, obtains guide coefficient ηinit
Step 6, broken using B-K delamination criterion to (0.25,0.5 and 0.75) under I type, II type and different mixing ratios It splits toughness stationary value to be fitted, obtains guide coefficient ηprop
Step 7, with ηinitAnd ηprop, I type delamination fractures toughness initial value and stationary value, the starting of II type delamination fractures toughness Value and stationary value are basic parameter, establish one to load mixing ratio as the prediction of the Mixed-Mode Delamination resistance curve of independent variable Formula predicts any load mixing ratio lower plywood separation resistance curve.
Further, carbon-fiber-reinforcomposite composite material layer plate is made of the one-way tape prepreg using T800/X850.
Further, step 1 design, the fibre reinforced with predetermined+22.5 °/- 22.5 ° layering interfaces of manufacture are multiple Condensation material laminate sample has following ply stacking-sequence: (+22.5 °/- 22.5 °)6//(+22.5°/-22.5°)6
Further, step 3 calculates I type delamination fractures toughness G using the method based on amendment beam theoryIC, specific to calculate Formula are as follows:
Wherein, PIAnd dIIt is the load and displacement applied to sample respectively, a and b are the layering length and width of sample respectively Degree, Δ be layered length correction amount, for consider sample split sharp position due to material anisotropy it is additional displacement and Rotation.
The step 3 determines II mode Ⅱ fracture toughness G using flexibility methodIICFormula are as follows:
Wherein, PIIIt is critical load, C is sample flexibility;
The step 3 determines I/II mixed type interlayer faults toughness G according to amendment beam theoryI/IICFormula are as follows:
GI/IIC=GI+GII
Wherein, PI/IIIt is the load applied to sample, c is that load applies distance of the point to intermediate load roller bearing, PgIt is fixture Middle upper beam and the weight for being attached to wherein loading blocks, cgFor distance of the center of gravity to intermediate load roller bearing of fixture, EfIt is that sample is curved Bent modulus, h are sample thickness, L be fixed span away from.
Further, the used separation resistance curve theory formula being fitted to data of step 4 is as follows:
Wherein, lbzIt is respectively fiber bridge joint length and delamination length, G with Δ ainitAnd GpropRespectively delamination fractures Toughness initial value and stationary value.<>is a kind of special algorithm:
Further, in the step 5 and 6 by under I type, II type and different mixing ratio fracture toughness initial value or Person's stationary value carries out least square fitting and obtains the parameter η value in criterion, used B-K delamination criterion are as follows:
Further, with ηinitAnd ηprop, fiber bridge joint length, I type delamination fractures toughness initial value and stationary value, II type Delamination fractures toughness initial value and stationary value are basic parameter, and one is hindered using loading mixing ratio as the Mixed-Mode Delamination of independent variable The predictor formula of force curve has following form:
Wherein,WithIt is I type and II type delamination fractures toughness initial value respectively,WithBe respectively I type and II type delamination fractures toughness stationary value, ηinitAnd ηpropIt is the B- of different layering type fracture toughness initial values and stationary value respectively K criterion fitting parameter.
The advantages of the present invention over the prior art are that:
(1) of the invention for the existing unpredictable any mixing ratio lower leaf of carbon-fiber-reinforcomposite composite material layer plate of research The problem of resistance curve, proposes the prediction technique for being convenient for engineer application.
(2) present invention can predict any mixing by the experimental test to finite mixtures than lower plywood delamination fractures toughness Than lower carbon-fiber-reinforcomposite composite material layer plate separation resistance curve, therefore the workload of experimental test can be substantially reduced, reduce test Cost.
(3) prediction result of the invention has been subjected to verification experimental verification, and predicted value and test measured value have preferable consistency, table Bright prediction technique of the present invention has preferable applicability.
Detailed description of the invention
Fig. 1 is implementation flow chart of the invention;
Fig. 2 is the configuration and geometric dimension (unit: mm) for being layered sample;
Fig. 3 is the schematic diagram of DCB, ENF and MMB experimental rig;
Fig. 4 is I type, II type and I/II Mixed-Mode Delamination fracture toughness test data;
Fig. 5 is the fitting result that interlaminar fracture toughness initial value uses B-K criterion under different mixing ratios;
Fig. 6 is the fitting result that interlaminar fracture toughness stationary value uses B-K criterion under different mixing ratios;
Fig. 7 is Mixed-Mode Delamination resistance curve test value and predicted value comparison.
Specific embodiment
Below with reference to embodiment, invention is further described in detail.
A kind of prediction technique of composite material Mixed-Mode Delamination resistance curve of the present invention, the specific implementation steps are as follows:
Step 1: being designed according to ASTM standard D5528-13 and manufacture the sample with+22.5 °/- 22.5 ° layering interfaces. Sample ply stacking-sequence is respectively (+22.5 °/- 22.5 °)6//(+22.5°/-22.5°)6.DCB, ENF and MMB experiment are using identical The sample of configuration and geometric dimension.Sample configuration and geometric dimension are as shown in Figure 2.Carbon-fiber-reinforcomposite composite material layer plate uses The one-way tape prepreg of T800 carbon fiber/epoxy resin solidifies to obtain according to specified ply stacking-sequence heap poststack.
Step 2: respectively referring to ASTM standard D5528-13, D7905/D7905M-14 and D6671/D6671M-13e1, open I type, II type and the test of I/II mixed type static(al) delamination are opened up, Fig. 3 is experimental rig schematic diagram.Wherein, I/II mixed type is quiet The test mixing ratio of force stratification expanding test is 0.25,0.5 and 0.75, real by adjusting distance c of the load(ing) point away from sample middle section The mixing ratio investigated needed for existing.Loading mode is Bit andits control, chooses lower loading speed (0.1mm/min) and guarantees layering The slow stabilization of extension, obtains enough data points.Record applied load, displacement and layering in real time during test Extension length.
Step 3: I type delamination fractures toughness G is calculated using the method based on amendment beam theoryIC, specific formula for calculation are as follows:
Wherein, PIAnd dIIt is the load and displacement applied to sample respectively, a and b are the layering length and width of sample respectively Degree.Δ is the correction amount for being layered length, specific to determine that method is the sample flexibility calculated under different layering length, to what is measured C1/3~a data carry out linear fit, fitting a straight line on transverse axis intercept absolute value be layered length correction amount.
The step 3 determines II mode Ⅱ fracture toughness G using flexibility methodIICFormula are as follows:
Wherein, PIIIt is critical load, C is sample flexibility;It is soft by calculating a series of corresponding sample of different layering length a C is spent, linear fit is then carried out and obtainsG is calculated further according to II mode Ⅱ fracture toughness expression formulaIIC
The step 3 determines I/II mixed type interlayer faults toughness G according to amendment beam theoryI/IICFormula are as follows:
GI/IIC=GI+GII
Wherein, PI/IIIt is the load applied to sample, c is that load applies distance of the point to intermediate load roller bearing, PgIt is fixture Middle upper beam and the weight for being attached to wherein loading blocks, cgFor distance of the center of gravity to intermediate load roller bearing of fixture, EfIt is that sample is curved Bent modulus, h are sample thickness, and L is fixed span away from as shown in Fig. 3.
According to I/II Mixed-Mode Delamination test data, interlaminar fracture toughness I type component G is calculated separatelyIWith II component GII, two Person is added to obtain GI/IIC
Step 4:I type, II type and I/II Mixed-Mode Delamination fracture toughness test data are as shown in figure 4, using following formula Data are fitted.
Wherein, lbzIt is respectively fiber bridge joint length and delamination length, G with Δ ainitAnd GpropRespectively delamination fractures Toughness initial value and stationary value.<>is a kind of special algorithm:By curve matching, obtain not With mixing ratio lower leaf fracture toughness initial value, stationary value and fiber bridge joint length.The results are shown in Table 1.
1 I type of table, II type and I/II Mixed-Mode Delamination fracture toughness initial value, stationary value and fiber bridge joint length
Step 5 and 6: by the fracture toughness initial value in table 1 and stablize Value Data and bring B-K delamination criterion into respectively In, the least square fitting of data is carried out, determines the parameter η in B-K delamination criterioninitAnd ηpropValue, fitting result point Not as it can be seen in figures 5 and 6, obtaining ηinit=1.61 and ηprop=2.05.
Step 7: with the η obtained in abovementioned stepsinitAnd ηprop, fiber bridge joint length, I type delamination fractures toughness initial value It is basic parameter with stationary value, II type delamination fractures toughness initial value and stationary value, using one shown in following formula to load mixing ThanLayering for the predictor formula of the Mixed-Mode Delamination resistance curve of independent variable, under being 0.25,0.5 and 0.75 to mixing ratio Resistance curve is predicted that prediction result is as shown in Figure 6.
It can be seen that prediction result and test result are coincide preferably.Demonstrate a kind of composite material mixed type proposed by the present invention point The applicability of the prediction technique of layer resistance curve.
Part of that present invention that are not described in detail belong to the well-known technology of those skilled in the art.
The above, part specific embodiment only of the present invention, but scope of protection of the present invention is not limited thereto, appoints In the technical scope disclosed by the present invention, any changes or substitutions that can be easily thought of, should all cover by what those skilled in the art Within protection scope of the present invention.

Claims (7)

1. a kind of prediction technique of composite material Mixed-Mode Delamination resistance curve, it is characterised in that the following steps are included:
Step 1, manufacture and design the carbon-fiber-reinforcomposite composite material layer plate sample with+22.5 °/- 22.5 ° layering interfaces;
Step 2, to said sample, I is carried out using double cantilever beam, end notches bending and hybrid mode bend test device respectively Type, II type and the test of I/II Mixed-Mode Delamination, wherein the load mixing ratio of Mixed-Mode Delamination test is 0.25,0.5 and 0.75;
Step 3, load, displacement and layering length are obtained by experiment, determines the I type, II type and I/II Mixed-Mode Delamination of sample Resistance curve;
Step 4, data are fitted using separation resistance curve theory formula, determine that the fracture toughness of different layering tests rises Initial value, stationary value and fiber bridge joint length;
Step 5, tough using fracture of the B-K delamination criterion to (0.25,0.5 and 0.75) under I type, II type and different mixing ratios Property initial value be fitted, obtain guide coefficient ηinit
Step 6, tough using fracture of the B-K delamination criterion to (0.25,0.5 and 0.75) under I type, II type and different mixing ratios Property stationary value be fitted, obtain guide coefficient ηprop
Step 7, with ηinitAnd ηprop, I type delamination fractures toughness initial value and stationary value, II type delamination fractures toughness initial value and Stationary value is basic parameter, establishes one to load mixing ratio as the predictor formula of the Mixed-Mode Delamination resistance curve of independent variable, Any load mixing ratio lower plywood separation resistance curve is predicted.
2. a kind of prediction technique of composite material Mixed-Mode Delamination resistance curve according to claim 1, it is characterised in that: Carbon-fiber-reinforcomposite composite material layer plate is made of the one-way tape prepreg using T800/X850.
3. a kind of prediction technique of composite material Mixed-Mode Delamination resistance curve according to claim 1, it is characterised in that: Step 1 design, the carbon-fiber-reinforcomposite composite material layer plate sample with predetermined+22.5 °/- 22.5 ° layering interfaces manufactured have Following ply stacking-sequence: (+22.5 °/- 22.5 °)6//(+22.5°/-22.5°)6
4. a kind of prediction technique of composite material Mixed-Mode Delamination resistance curve according to claim 1, it is characterised in that: Step 3 calculates I type delamination fractures toughness G using the method based on amendment beam theoryIC, specific formula for calculation are as follows:
Wherein, PIAnd dIIt is the load and displacement applied to sample respectively, a and b are the layering length and width of sample, Δ respectively It is the correction amount for being layered length, for considering that sample is splitting sharp position additional displacement and rotation due to material anisotropy.
The step 3 determines II mode Ⅱ fracture toughness G using flexibility methodIICFormula are as follows:
Wherein, PIIIt is critical load, C is sample flexibility;
The step 3 determines I/II mixed type interlayer faults toughness G according to amendment beam theoryI/IICFormula are as follows:
GI/IIC=GI+GII
Wherein, PI/IIIt is the load applied to sample, c is that load applies distance of the point to intermediate load roller bearing, PgBe in fixture on Crossbeam and the weight for being attached to wherein loading blocks, cgFor distance of the center of gravity to intermediate load roller bearing of fixture, EfIt is sample bending die Amount, h are sample thickness, L be fixed span away from.
5. a kind of prediction technique of composite material Mixed-Mode Delamination resistance curve according to claim 1, it is characterised in that: The used separation resistance curve theory formula being fitted to test data of step 4 is as follows:
Wherein, lbzIt is respectively fiber bridge joint length and delamination length, G with Δ ainitAnd GpropRespectively delamination fractures toughness Initial value and stationary value.<>is a kind of special algorithm:
6. a kind of prediction technique of composite material Mixed-Mode Delamination resistance curve according to claim 1, it is characterised in that: By to the fracture toughness initial value or stationary value progress minimum under I type, II type and different mixing ratios in the step 5 and 6 Two, which multiply fitting, obtains the parameter η value in criterion, used B-K delamination criterion are as follows:
Wherein, GIC、GIICAnd GI/IICRespectively I type, II type and I/II Mixed-Mode Delamination fracture toughness.
7. a kind of prediction technique of composite material Mixed-Mode Delamination resistance curve according to claim 1, it is characterised in that: With ηinitAnd ηprop, fiber bridge joint length, I type delamination fractures toughness initial value and stationary value, II type delamination fractures toughness initial value It is basic parameter with stationary value, one has to load mixing ratio as the predictor formula of the Mixed-Mode Delamination resistance curve of independent variable Following form:
Wherein,WithIt is I type and II type delamination fractures toughness initial value respectively,WithIt is I type and II type respectively Delamination fractures toughness stationary value, ηinitAnd ηpropIt is the B-K criterion of different layering type fracture toughness initial values and stationary value respectively Fitting parameter.
CN201910203909.XA 2019-03-18 2019-03-18 Prediction method of composite material mixed type layered resistance curve Expired - Fee Related CN109991077B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201910203909.XA CN109991077B (en) 2019-03-18 2019-03-18 Prediction method of composite material mixed type layered resistance curve

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201910203909.XA CN109991077B (en) 2019-03-18 2019-03-18 Prediction method of composite material mixed type layered resistance curve

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN109991077A true CN109991077A (en) 2019-07-09
CN109991077B CN109991077B (en) 2021-10-19

Family

ID=67129433

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201910203909.XA Expired - Fee Related CN109991077B (en) 2019-03-18 2019-03-18 Prediction method of composite material mixed type layered resistance curve

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN109991077B (en)

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN110470534A (en) * 2019-07-22 2019-11-19 中国航发北京航空材料研究院 A kind of composite material interlayer I type fracture toughness test method without tracking crackle
CN111551485A (en) * 2020-04-16 2020-08-18 重庆大学 Improved composite material laminated plate I/II mixed type interlayer fracture toughness testing method
CN111624099A (en) * 2020-04-16 2020-09-04 重庆大学 Composite material laminated plate II type fatigue layering test device suitable for high and low temperature environment
CN113627012A (en) * 2021-08-06 2021-11-09 长安大学 Method for predicting breaking strength of carbon fiber/metal laminated structure after surface scratch
CN114184467A (en) * 2020-09-15 2022-03-15 中国航发商用航空发动机有限责任公司 Test piece for fracture performance test and preparation method thereof
CN114896763A (en) * 2022-04-18 2022-08-12 重庆大学 Method for predicting composite material I/II mixed fracture response surface

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN105488310A (en) * 2016-01-22 2016-04-13 重庆大学 Prediction method for normalized fatigue delamination propagation rate of CFRP (carbon fiber-reinforced plastic) multi-directional laminated plate
CN106599507A (en) * 2016-12-26 2017-04-26 北京航空航天大学 Hierarchical prediction method for composite material multi-direction lamination board by considering fiber bridge connection influence based on improved B-K criterion
CN107330202A (en) * 2017-07-05 2017-11-07 北京航空航天大学 A kind of composite I types layering bridging rule based on virtual hierarchy expanding test determines method
CN107357973A (en) * 2017-06-26 2017-11-17 北京航空航天大学 A kind of Forecasting Methodology of any interface layer I types delamination fractures toughness stationary value of CFRP layer plate
CN109190258A (en) * 2018-09-06 2019-01-11 中国航发北京航空材料研究院 A kind of composite-material laminates I type method for layering simulation based on the superposition of cohesion unit

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN105488310A (en) * 2016-01-22 2016-04-13 重庆大学 Prediction method for normalized fatigue delamination propagation rate of CFRP (carbon fiber-reinforced plastic) multi-directional laminated plate
CN106599507A (en) * 2016-12-26 2017-04-26 北京航空航天大学 Hierarchical prediction method for composite material multi-direction lamination board by considering fiber bridge connection influence based on improved B-K criterion
CN107357973A (en) * 2017-06-26 2017-11-17 北京航空航天大学 A kind of Forecasting Methodology of any interface layer I types delamination fractures toughness stationary value of CFRP layer plate
CN107330202A (en) * 2017-07-05 2017-11-07 北京航空航天大学 A kind of composite I types layering bridging rule based on virtual hierarchy expanding test determines method
CN109190258A (en) * 2018-09-06 2019-01-11 中国航发北京航空材料研究院 A kind of composite-material laminates I type method for layering simulation based on the superposition of cohesion unit

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
赵丽滨: "纤维增强复合材料层合板分层扩展行为研究进展", 《航空学报》 *

Cited By (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN110470534A (en) * 2019-07-22 2019-11-19 中国航发北京航空材料研究院 A kind of composite material interlayer I type fracture toughness test method without tracking crackle
CN110470534B (en) * 2019-07-22 2021-10-15 中国航发北京航空材料研究院 Composite material interlayer I-type fracture toughness testing method without tracking cracks
CN111551485A (en) * 2020-04-16 2020-08-18 重庆大学 Improved composite material laminated plate I/II mixed type interlayer fracture toughness testing method
CN111624099A (en) * 2020-04-16 2020-09-04 重庆大学 Composite material laminated plate II type fatigue layering test device suitable for high and low temperature environment
CN111624099B (en) * 2020-04-16 2022-10-04 重庆大学 Composite material laminated plate II type fatigue layering test device suitable for high and low temperature environment
CN111551485B (en) * 2020-04-16 2023-01-31 重庆大学 Improved composite material laminated plate I/II mixed type interlayer fracture toughness testing method
CN114184467A (en) * 2020-09-15 2022-03-15 中国航发商用航空发动机有限责任公司 Test piece for fracture performance test and preparation method thereof
CN114184467B (en) * 2020-09-15 2024-04-26 中国航发商用航空发动机有限责任公司 Test piece for testing fracture performance and preparation method thereof
CN113627012A (en) * 2021-08-06 2021-11-09 长安大学 Method for predicting breaking strength of carbon fiber/metal laminated structure after surface scratch
CN113627012B (en) * 2021-08-06 2023-06-20 长安大学 Method for predicting fracture strength of carbon fiber/metal layered structure after surface scratch
CN114896763A (en) * 2022-04-18 2022-08-12 重庆大学 Method for predicting composite material I/II mixed fracture response surface

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN109991077B (en) 2021-10-19

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN109991077A (en) A kind of prediction technique of composite material Mixed-Mode Delamination resistance curve
Pereira et al. Mode I interlaminar fracture of carbon/epoxy multidirectional laminates
Jose et al. Intralaminar fracture toughness of a cross-ply laminate and its constituent sub-laminates
Pellegrino et al. Experimental study on bond behavior between concrete and FRP reinforcement
Kotynia et al. Flexural strengthening of RC beams with externally bonded CFRP systems: Test results and 3D nonlinear FE analysis
Leung et al. Effect of size on the failure of geometrically similar concrete beams strengthened in shear with FRP strips
Kishi et al. Numerical cracking and debonding analysis of RC beams reinforced with FRP sheet
Valvo On the calculation of energy release rate and mode mixity in delaminated laminated beams
Mak et al. Flexural behavior of sandwich panels with bio-FRP skins made of flax fibers and epoxidized pine-oil resin
Stanley et al. Development and evaluation of stitched sandwich panels
Harvey et al. Mixed-mode partition theories for one-dimensional delamination in laminated composite beams
Toutanji et al. Interfacial bond strength characteristics of FRP and RC substrate
CN106599507B (en) A method of improving B-K criterion for fibre-bearing bridge joint influences the multidirectional Laminates With Delamination prediction of composite material
Pereira et al. Mode II interlaminar fracture of glass/epoxy multidirectional laminates
Leung FRP debonding from a concrete substrate: Some recent findings against conventional belief
Carloni Analyzing bond characteristics between composites and quasi-brittle substrates in the repair of bridges and other concrete structures
Pereira et al. Mixed mode I+ II interlaminar fracture of glass/epoxy multidirectional laminates–Part 2: Experiments
CN107357973B (en) Prediction method for I-type layered fracture toughness stable value of any interlayer interface of CFRP (carbon fiber reinforced polymer) laminate
De Morais Analysis of mode II interlaminar fracture of multidirectional laminates
Rabinovitch Cohesive interface modeling of debonding failure in FRP strengthened beams
De Morais et al. Mixed mode I+ II interlaminar fracture of glass/epoxy multidirectional laminates–Part 1: Analysis
Bahn et al. Flexural behavior of reinforced concrete beams strengthened with CFRP sheets and epoxy mortar
Xu et al. Highly tough 3D woven composite materials: Fracture characterization and toughening mechanisms
Cepero et al. An experimental study of the translaminar fracture toughnesses in composites for different crack growth directions, parallel and transverse to the fiber direction
Liu et al. Mixed mode fracture characterization of GFRP-concrete bonded interface using four-point single leg bending test

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant
CF01 Termination of patent right due to non-payment of annual fee

Granted publication date: 20211019

CF01 Termination of patent right due to non-payment of annual fee