CN109948870A - Food safety risk grade determines method and device - Google Patents
Food safety risk grade determines method and device Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN109948870A CN109948870A CN201711379992.3A CN201711379992A CN109948870A CN 109948870 A CN109948870 A CN 109948870A CN 201711379992 A CN201711379992 A CN 201711379992A CN 109948870 A CN109948870 A CN 109948870A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- food safety
- management body
- risk grade
- safety risk
- food
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 235000013305 food Nutrition 0.000 title claims abstract description 307
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 36
- 238000007689 inspection Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 47
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 claims description 35
- 230000003068 static effect Effects 0.000 claims description 23
- 238000011835 investigation Methods 0.000 claims description 19
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 claims description 14
- 238000012797 qualification Methods 0.000 claims description 7
- 238000005070 sampling Methods 0.000 abstract description 7
- 238000007726 management method Methods 0.000 description 194
- 239000000047 product Substances 0.000 description 12
- 238000007619 statistical method Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000003860 storage Methods 0.000 description 5
- 239000003814 drug Substances 0.000 description 3
- 235000013399 edible fruits Nutrition 0.000 description 3
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 235000013361 beverage Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 235000013339 cereals Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 235000013365 dairy product Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 235000013622 meat product Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 2
- 235000013311 vegetables Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 240000007594 Oryza sativa Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000007164 Oryza sativa Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 241000940835 Pales Species 0.000 description 1
- 206010033546 Pallor Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 241000209140 Triticum Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000021307 Triticum Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000006978 adaptation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003044 adaptive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 235000013405 beer Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 1
- 235000015895 biscuits Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007796 conventional method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007405 data analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013500 data storage Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229940079593 drug Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 235000013312 flour Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000005484 gravity Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000036541 health Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000006872 improvement Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000000056 organ Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 235000020095 red wine Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 235000009566 rice Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000011265 semifinished product Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000013517 stratification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 235000020097 white wine Nutrition 0.000 description 1
Landscapes
- Medical Treatment And Welfare Office Work (AREA)
Abstract
The disclosure provides a kind of food safety risk grade and determines method and device, is related to technical field of food safety, is able to solve the existing problem for determining food safety risk grade inaccuracy by single sampling inspection.The specific technical proposal is: obtaining the title and business scope of management body；According to the title of management body, obtains and information is checked to the food safety of management body in first time period；Information is checked according to the business scope of management body and the food safety of management body, determines the food safety risk grade of the management body in first time period.The present invention is used for food safety risk early warning.
Description
Technical field
This disclosure relates to which technical field of food safety more particularly to a kind of food safety risk grade determine method and dress
It sets.
Background technique
In recent years, with rapid development of economy, continuous improvement of people's living standards, food-safety problem increasingly at
Therefore reinforce the significant problem that food-safe monitoring has become government and social concerns for people's focus of attention.It is existing
Food-safe inspection is to be checked to obtain inspection result to sampling product, so by being sampled checked food
Inspection result and national standard are compared afterwards, so that it is determined that whether checked food is safe.But the inspection result can only
Sample itself is responsible for, is not enough to provide global food safety risk grade.
Summary of the invention
The embodiment of the present disclosure provides a kind of food safety risk grade and determines method and device, solves existing to take out by single
Sample inspection determines the problem of food safety risk grade inaccuracy.The technical solution is as follows:
According to the first aspect of the embodiments of the present disclosure, a kind of food safety risk grade is provided and determines method, this method packet
It includes:
Obtain the title and business scope of management body；
According to the title of management body, obtains and information is checked to the food safety of management body in first time period；
Information is checked according to the business scope of management body and the food safety of management body, is determined in first time period
The food safety risk grade of management body.
By checking that information is for statistical analysis to the food safety in certain time period, determine from various dimensions in the time
The food safety risk grade of management body in section, solution is existing to determine food safety risk grade not by single sampling inspection
Accurate problem.
In one embodiment, the food safety of management body checks that information includes current check data, illegal investigation number
According to examine detection data；
Current check data include the inspection of the operation qualification, business operation condition, practitioner, production environment to management body
Number and inspection result, illegal investigation data include illegal number, illicit content and the punishment of management body as a result, examining detection
Data include the detection data of product managed to management body and the different information of detection data and national standard.
Multiple inspection information relevant to management body are obtained, the diversified and comprehensive of data is realized, avoids data
Unicity.
In one embodiment, information is checked according to the business scope of management body and the food safety of management body, really
The food safety risk grade for determining management body includes:
The food safety static parameter of management body is obtained according to the business scope of management body；
According to the current check data of management body, illegal investigation data and detection data is examined to respectively obtain management body
The first food safety dynamic parameter, the second food safety dynamic parameter and third food safety dynamic parameter；
Food safety static parameter, the first food safety dynamic parameter, the second food safety dynamic of management body are joined
Several and third food safety dynamic parameter is weighted, and obtains the food safety risk grade of management body.
By realizing that food-safe risk class is determined from various dimensions in terms of static and dynamic two.
In one embodiment, this method further include: according to the food safety risk of the management body in first time period
Grade determines the food safety warning grade of the management body in second time period.
Early warning is carried out to the food safety risk grade of subsequent time period, in order to which law enfrocement official adjusts according to warning grade
Law enforcement dynamics avoids the generation of food safety accident, prevents trouble before it happens.
In one embodiment, when first time period is current year, second time period is next time of current year
When, according to the food safety risk grade of the management body in first time period, determine the management body in second time period
Food safety warning grade includes:
Obtain management body food safety risk grade over the years；
The food safety risk grade over the years to management body is averaged, and obtains management body food safety risk over the years
The average value of grade；
To the food safety risk grade of upper time management body, food safety risk of current year management body etc.
The average value of grade and management body food safety risk grade over the years is weighted, and obtains the food peace in a management body lower time
Full warning grade.
In one embodiment, to the food safety risk grade in a time, the food peace of current year on management body
Full risk class and the average value of management body food safety risk grade are weighted, and obtain the food in a management body lower time
Product security risk grade includes:
The food safety risk grade in a management body lower time is obtained using the first formula, the first formula includes: Mnext
=α Mpre+βMcurr+λMave, st: alpha+beta+λ=1；
Wherein, MnextIndicate the food safety risk grade in a management body lower time, MpreIt indicates on management body 1 year
The food safety risk grade of part, McurrIndicate the food safety risk grade of management body current year, MaveIt indicates to manage master
The average value of body food safety risk grade, α, β and λ indicate weighted factor.
According to the second aspect of an embodiment of the present disclosure, a kind of food safety risk grade determining device is provided, comprising: first
Obtain module, the second acquisition module and the first determining module；
First obtains module, for obtaining the title and business scope of management body；
Second obtains module, for the title according to management body, obtains in first time period to the food of management body
Product safety inspection information；
First determining module, for checking information according to the business scope of management body and the food safety of management body,
Determine the food safety risk grade of the management body in first time period.
In one embodiment, the food safety of management body checks that information includes current check data, illegal investigation number
According to examine detection data；
Current check data include the inspection of the operation qualification, business operation condition, practitioner, production environment to management body
Number and inspection result, illegal investigation data include illegal number, illicit content and the punishment of management body as a result, examining detection
Data include the detection data of product managed to management body and the different information of detection data and national standard.
In one embodiment, the first determining module includes:
Static parameter acquisition submodule, the food safety for obtaining management body for the business scope according to management body are quiet
State parameter；
Dynamic parameter acquisition submodule, for the current check data, illegal investigation data and inspection according to management body
Detection data respectively obtains the first food safety dynamic parameter, the second food safety dynamic parameter and third food of management body
Safety actuality parameter；
First weighting submodule, for management body food safety static parameter, the first food safety dynamic parameter,
Second food safety dynamic parameter and third food safety dynamic parameter are weighted, and obtain the food safety risk of management body
Grade.
In one embodiment, food safety risk determining device further include: the second determining module；
Second determining module is determined for the food safety risk grade according to the management body in first time period
The food safety warning grade of management body in second time period.
In one embodiment, the second determining module includes:
Acquisition submodule, for being current year in first time period, second time period is next time of current year
When, obtain management body food safety risk grade over the years；
Average submodule obtains management body for being averaged to management body food safety risk grade over the years
The average value of food safety risk grade over the years；
Second weighting submodule, for the food safety risk grade to upper time management body, current year operation
The average value of the food safety risk grade and management body of main body food safety risk grade over the years is weighted, and is managed
The food safety warning grade in a main body lower time.
In one embodiment, the second weighting submodule is used to obtain the food in a management body lower time using the first formula
Product security risk grade, the first formula include:
Mnext=α Mpre+βMcurr+λMave, st: alpha+beta+λ=1；
Wherein, MnextIndicate the food safety risk grade in a management body lower time, MpreIt indicates on management body 1 year
The food safety risk grade of part, McurrIndicate the food safety risk grade of management body current year, MaveIt indicates to manage master
The average value of body food safety risk grade, α, β and λ indicate weighted factor.
It should be understood that above general description and following detailed description be only it is exemplary and explanatory, not
The disclosure can be limited.
Detailed description of the invention
The drawings herein are incorporated into the specification and forms part of this specification, and shows the implementation for meeting the disclosure
Example, and together with specification for explaining the principles of this disclosure.
Fig. 1 is the flow chart that a kind of food safety risk grade that the embodiment of the present disclosure provides determines method；
Fig. 2 is the flow chart that a kind of food safety risk grade that the embodiment of the present disclosure provides determines method；
Fig. 3 is the flow chart that a kind of food safety risk grade that the embodiment of the present disclosure provides determines method；
Fig. 4 is a kind of structure chart for food safety risk grade determining device that the embodiment of the present disclosure provides；
Fig. 5 is a kind of structure chart for food safety risk grade determining device that the embodiment of the present disclosure provides；
Fig. 6 is a kind of structure chart for food safety risk grade determining device that the embodiment of the present disclosure provides；
Fig. 7 is a kind of structure chart for food safety risk grade determining device that the embodiment of the present disclosure provides.
Specific embodiment
Example embodiments are described in detail here, and the example is illustrated in the accompanying drawings.Following description is related to
When attached drawing, unless otherwise indicated, the same numbers in different drawings indicate the same or similar elements.Following exemplary embodiment
Described in embodiment do not represent all implementations consistent with this disclosure.On the contrary, they be only with it is such as appended
The example of the consistent device and method of some aspects be described in detail in claims, the disclosure.
The embodiment of the present disclosure provides a kind of food safety risk grade and determines method, as shown in Figure 1, the food safety risk
Grade determine method the following steps are included:
101, the title and business scope of management body are obtained.
Management body, which refers to, to accomplish the object of profit making, and is engaged in the economic entity of commodity production management and service activities, economical real
Body can be enterprise, be also possible to individual operator.To become management body, it is necessary to obtain and manage qualification.This sentences industry and commerce
Administration organ issue industrial and commercial enterprises, individual operator business license for be illustrated, from business license obtain warp
Seek the information such as title, the business scope of main body.
Business scope refers to merchandise classification, kind and the service item that country allows enterprise to produce and manage, and reflects enterprise
The content of business activity and production and operation direction are the pales of law of enterprise business activities range.In view of embodiment of the present disclosure master
Will be directed to field of food safety, therefore, in the embodiment of the present disclosure business scope of management body include grain class (as rice, flour,
Wheat etc.), drinks (such as white wine, beer, red wine), beverage class, meat products class (such as prepared food, semi-finished product), foodstuff (such as point
The heart, biscuit etc.), food and drink class, vegetable and fruit class, dairy products etc..
102, it according to the title of management body, obtains and the food safety inspection of management body is believed in first time period
Breath.
In one embodiment of the present disclosure, the food safety of management body checks that information includes current check data, disobeys
Method investigates and prosecutes data and examines detection data.Wherein, current check data include operation qualification to management body, business operation condition,
The inspection number and inspection result of practitioner；It is illegal to investigate and prosecute illegal number, illicit content and the place that data include management body
Penalize result；Examining detection data includes the detection data and detection data and national standard of product managed to management body
Different information.
Illustratively, the inspection to qualification is managed can check whether is food business licence that management body is held
Expired, whether the content of recorded operation is consistent with practical operation in food business licence.Inspection to business operation condition, can
To check whether there is the production and operation equipment adaptable with the food kind of production and operation, quantity, manage produce environment whether
It is clean and tidy etc..Inspection to practitioner can check whether there is food safety patented technology personnel and administrative staff, practitioner
Whether unsoundness card etc..
In addition, first time period can be set according to the actual demand of user, first time period can be month, season
Degree, half a year, 1 year or user's customized period, there is no limit to this for the embodiment of the present disclosure.
103, information is checked according to the business scope of management body and the food safety of management body, determined at the first time
The food safety risk grade of management body in section.
In one embodiment of the present disclosure, according to the food safety inspection of the business scope of management body and management body
Information determines that the food safety risk grade of management body includes: in first time period
Food static security parameter is determined according to the business scope of management body；
According to the current check data of management body, illegal investigation data and detection data is examined to respectively obtain the first food
Dynamic security parameter, the second food dynamic security parameter and third food dynamic security parameter；Safety inspection information obtains dynamic
Security parameter；
Food static security parameter, the first food dynamic security parameter, the second food dynamic security parameter and third are eaten
Product dynamic security parameter is weighted, and obtains the food safety risk grade of the management body in first time period.
By the range that each management body is managed be it is determining, can be according to the business scope of management body
Obtain static security parameter.It, can be by step according to food variety, the complexity of food manufacturing and to the influence degree of human body
Grain class, vegetable and fruit class, drinks, beverage class, meat products class, foodstuff, food and drink class, dairy products in 101 etc. carry out grade
Classification, to obtain food static security parameter according to the business scope of management body.When a certain management body manages multiple types
When the food of type, using the highest food static security parameter as the management body of managed food middle grade.
In addition, including routine inspection and casual inspection for the safety inspection of management body, due to the result checked every time
May be it is different, therefore, can according to the current check data of management body, illegal investigation data and examine detection data
Three different food dynamic security parameters are obtained, then the food dynamic security that food static security parameter and three is different
Parameter is weighted to obtain the food safety risk grade of management body in first time period.This sentences food safety risk grade
It is divided into for five kinds of different grades of A, B, C, D, E and is illustrated, does not represent the disclosure and be confined to this.Wherein, A indicates highest
Grade, B indicate that time high E indicates the lowest class.
Illustratively, food static security parameter and food dynamic security parameter add up to 100%, wherein food is static
Security parameter accounts for 30% in total, and the first food dynamic security parameter, the second food dynamic security parameter and third food dynamic are pacified
Population parameter accounts for 70% in total, and the distribution of these three food dynamic security parameter specific gravity can be fixed, can also basis
The difference of business scope is set.
The food safety risk grade that the embodiment of the present disclosure provides determines method, by the title and warp that obtain management body
Seek range；According to the title of management body, obtains and information is checked to the food safety of management body in first time period；According to
The business scope of management body and the food safety of management body check information, determine the food of the management body in first time period
Product security risk grade.By checking that information is for statistical analysis to the food safety in certain time period, determined from various dimensions
The food safety risk grade of management body during this period of time, solution is existing to determine food safety wind by single sampling inspection
The problem of dangerous grade inaccuracy.
The food safety risk grade provided based on the corresponding embodiment of Fig. 1 determines method, as shown in Fig. 2, this method is also
Include:
104, according to the food safety risk grade of the management body in first time period, determination passes through in second time period
Seek the food safety warning grade of main body.
Food safety warning grade is used to estimate the food safety risk grade in management body second time period,
According to estimation results, the law enforcement dynamics in second time period is formulated convenient for law enfrocement official, food-safety problem is avoided the occurrence of, prevents
In possible trouble.Second time period can be identical as first time period, can also be different.
In one embodiment of the present disclosure, the food safety risk grade according to management body in first time period,
Estimate food safety warning grade of the management body in second time period.When the management body occurs in first time period
When food safety accident, need to reinforce the inspection to management body food safety, therefore, the management body in second time period
Food safety warning grade lower than the management body in first time period food safety risk grade.When in first time period
When the interior management body does not occur food safety accident, the food peace of the management body in second time period can be kept or reduced
Full warning grade.
In one embodiment of the present disclosure, when first time period is current year, second time period is current year
When next time, according to the food safety risk grade of the management body in first time period, determination passes through in second time period
Battalion main body food safety warning grade include:
1041, management body food safety risk grade over the years is obtained.
Wherein, management body food safety risk grade over the years refers to every before management body establishment to current year
1 year food safety risk grade.
1042, the food safety risk grade over the years to management body is averaged, and obtains management body food peace over the years
The average value of full risk class.
1043, to the food safety risk grade of upper time management body, the food safety of current year management body
Risk class and the average value of management body food safety risk grade over the years are weighted, and obtain next time management body
Food safety warning grade.
For the food safety warning grade of time management body next in step 1043, calculated using the first formula
It obtains, the first formula are as follows:
Mnext=α Mpre+βMcurr+λMave, st: alpha+beta+λ=1；
Wherein, MnextIndicate the food safety risk grade in a management body lower time, MpreIndicate the operation master
The food safety risk grade in a time, M on bodycurrIndicate the food safety risk grade of the management body current year,
MaveIndicate that the average value of the management body food safety risk grade, α, β and λ indicate weighted factor.
Pass through the food safety risk grade of upper time management body and the food safety wind of current year management body
Dangerous grade, it can be seen that the tendency of the food safety risk grade of the management body over the past two years, over the years by management body
The average value of food safety risk grade and management body food safety risk grade over the years, it can be seen that the management body is over the years
The food safety risk grade developing state come.By comprehensive analysis, the food safety risk of next time management body is estimated
Grade guarantees the reliability of data and the accuracy estimated.
The food safety risk grade that the embodiment of the present disclosure provides determines method, obtains the title of management body and manages model
It encloses；According to the title of management body, obtains and information is checked to the food safety of management body in first time period；According to operation
The business scope of main body and the food safety of management body check information, determine the food peace of the management body in first time period
Full risk class；According to the food safety risk grade of management body, the food peace of the management body in second time period is determined
Full warning grade, according to the food safety risk grade of the management body in first time period, determination passes through in second time period
Seek the food safety warning grade of main body.By checking that information is for statistical analysis to the food safety in certain time period, from
Various dimensions determine the food safety risk grade of management body during this period of time, solve existing determining by single sampling inspection
The problem of food safety risk grade inaccuracy.Early warning is carried out to the food safety risk grade of subsequent time period simultaneously, is avoided
There is food-safety problem, prevents trouble before it happens.
The food safety risk grade provided based on the corresponding embodiment of above-mentioned Fig. 1 and Fig. 2 determines that method, the disclosure are another
Embodiment provides a kind of food safety risk grade and determines method, referring to shown in Fig. 3, food safety risk provided in this embodiment
Grade determine method the following steps are included:
301, data acquire.
Food and drug administration system includes " administrative permission ", " current check ", " inspection is handled a case " and " examining detection " four
Operation system obtains the relevant information of management body in order to avoid the unicity of data from each operation system, specific:
Management body information is acquired from " administrative permission " system, management body information includes the address of management body, name
Title, legal person, business scope etc.；The current check data of management body, current check data are acquired from " current check " system
Whether the food variety including production consistent on business licence, producers whether unsoundness card or health card, production
Whether equipment sterilizes, whether production environment meets the requirements；The illegal investigation of management body is acquired from " inspection is handled a case " system
Data, illegal investigation data include whether management body commits unlawful acts, if commit unlawful acts, obtain illicit content, illegal
Number and punishment result etc.；The inspection detection data that management body Related product is acquired from " examining detection " system, examines inspection
Measured data includes the data detected to the quality of product itself.
302, data store.
When the food to management body carries out safety inspection, law enfrocement official can carry out production environment, production equipment etc.
It takes pictures, video record is carried out to enforcing law, and to the number for checking that data are recorded etc., therefore will be acquired in step 301
According to being divided, it is divided into structural data and unstructured data, structural data is stored in relevant database, it will be non-
Structural data is stored in file system.Wherein, structural data is by two-dimentional table structure come the data of logical expression and realization,
Storage and management mainly can be carried out by relational data；Opposite with structural data be unsuitable for by database bivariate table Lai
Unstructured data of performance, including office documents, picture, audio, video information etc..
303, food safety warning module constructs.
Food safety warning module includes static risk model and dynamic risk model.Food is determined according to the type of food
Static risk model, different food varieties adheres to different risk class separately；By " current check ", " inspection is handled a case " and " inspection
Test detection " result data construction dynamic risk model in system, " current check " emphasis index is to check number and check knot
Fruit, " inspection is handled a case " emphasis index have been whether that illegal investigation is true, if are emphasis case or typical case, " examining detection "
Emphasis index is the exception of detection data and national standard.
304, data analysis and application process.
By collecting the data of multiple operation systems, by management body and relevant current check data, illegal investigation number
According to, examine detection data to be associated processing, finished data and food safety warning module are carried out to of multiple dimensions
With analysis, the risk stratification and safe early warning of food and medicine and food and medicine management body are obtained, and simultaneously by findings data
Feed back to " current check ", " inspection is handled a case " and " examining detection " operation system.
The food safety risk grade that the embodiment of the present disclosure provides determines method, obtains the title of management body and manages model
It encloses；According to the title of management body, obtains and information is checked to the food safety of management body in first time period；According to operation
The business scope of main body and the food safety of management body check information, determine the food peace of the management body in first time period
Full risk class.By checking that information is for statistical analysis to the food safety in certain time period, determine from various dimensions at this
The food safety risk grade of management body in period, solution is existing to determine food safety risk etc. by single sampling inspection
The problem of grade inaccuracy.
Method, Xia Shuwei are determined based on food safety risk grade described in the corresponding embodiment of above-mentioned FIG. 1 to FIG. 3
Embodiment of the present disclosure can be used for executing embodiments of the present disclosure.
The embodiment of the present disclosure provides a kind of food safety risk grade determining device, as shown in figure 4, the food safety risk
Grade determining device 40 includes: that the first acquisition module 401, second obtains module 402 and the first determining module 403；
First obtains module 401, for obtaining the title and business scope of management body；
Second obtains module 402, for the title according to management body, obtains in first time period to management body
Food safety checks information；
First determining module 403, for being believed according to the business scope of management body and the food safety inspection of management body
Breath determines the food safety risk grade of the management body in first time period.
In one embodiment, the food safety of management body checks that information includes current check data, illegal investigation number
According to examine detection data；
Current check data include the inspection of the operation qualification, business operation condition, practitioner, production environment to management body
Number and inspection result, illegal investigation data include illegal number, illicit content and the punishment of management body as a result, examining detection
Data include the detection data of product managed to management body and the different information of detection data and national standard.
In one embodiment, as shown in figure 5, the first determining module 403 includes:
Static parameter acquisition submodule 4031 obtains the food peace of management body for the business scope according to management body
Full static parameter；
Dynamic parameter acquisition submodule 4032, for according to the current check data of management body, illegal investigation data and
Detection data is examined to respectively obtain the first food safety dynamic parameter, the second food safety dynamic parameter and third of management body
Food safety dynamic parameter；
First weighting submodule 4033, for food safety static parameter, the first food safety dynamic to management body
Parameter, the second food safety dynamic parameter and third food safety dynamic parameter are weighted, and obtain the food peace of management body
Full risk class.
In one embodiment, as shown in fig. 6, food safety risk grade determining device 40 further include: second determines mould
Block 404；
Second determining module 404 is determined for the food safety risk grade according to the management body in first time period
The food safety warning grade of management body in second time period.
In one embodiment, as shown in fig. 7, the second determining module 404 includes:
Acquisition submodule 4041, for being current year in first time period, second time period is the next of current year
When the time, management body food safety risk grade over the years is obtained；
Average submodule 4042 is managed for being averaged to management body food safety risk grade over the years
The average value of main body food safety risk grade over the years；
Second weighting submodule 4043, for the food safety risk grade to upper time management body, current year
The average value of the food safety risk grade and management body of management body food safety risk grade over the years is weighted, and is obtained
The food safety warning grade in a management body lower time.
In one embodiment, the second weighting submodule 4043 is used to obtain a management body lower time using the first formula
Food safety risk grade, the first formula includes:
Mnext=α Mpre+βMcurr+λMave, st: alpha+beta+λ=1；
Wherein, MnextIndicate the food safety risk grade in a management body lower time, MpreIt indicates on management body 1 year
The food safety risk grade of part, McurrIndicate the food safety risk grade of management body current year, MaveIt indicates to manage master
The average value of body food safety risk grade, α, β and λ indicate weighted factor.
The food safety risk grade determining device that the embodiment of the present disclosure provides obtains the title of management body and manages model
It encloses；According to the title of management body, obtains and information is checked to the food safety of management body in first time period；According to operation
The business scope of main body and the food safety of management body check information, determine the food peace of the management body in first time period
Full risk class.By checking that information is for statistical analysis to the food safety in certain time period, determine from various dimensions at this
The food safety risk grade of management body in period, solution is existing to determine food safety risk etc. by single sampling inspection
The problem of grade inaccuracy.
Determine that method, the disclosure are implemented based on food safety risk described in the corresponding embodiment of above-mentioned FIG. 1 to FIG. 3
Example also provides a kind of computer readable storage medium, for example, non-transitorycomputer readable storage medium can be read-only storage
Device (English: Read Only Memory, ROM), random access memory (English: Random Access Memory, RAM),
CD-ROM, tape, floppy disk and optical data storage devices etc..It is stored with computer instruction on the storage medium, it is above-mentioned for executing
Data transmission method described in the corresponding embodiment of FIG. 1 to FIG. 3, details are not described herein again.
Those skilled in the art will readily occur to its of the disclosure after considering specification and practicing disclosure disclosed herein
Its embodiment.This application is intended to cover any variations, uses, or adaptations of the disclosure, these modifications, purposes or
Person's adaptive change follows the general principles of this disclosure and including the undocumented common knowledge in the art of the disclosure
Or conventional techniques.The description and examples are only to be considered as illustrative, and the true scope and spirit of the disclosure are by following
Claim is pointed out.
It should be understood that the present disclosure is not limited to the precise structures that have been described above and shown in the drawings, and
And various modifications and changes may be made without departing from the scope thereof.The scope of the present disclosure is only limited by the accompanying claims.
Claims (10)
1. a kind of food safety risk grade determines method, which is characterized in that the described method includes:
Obtain the title and business scope of management body；
According to the title of the management body, obtains and the food safety inspection of the management body is believed in first time period
Breath；
Information is checked according to the business scope of the management body and the food safety of the management body, is determined described first
The food safety risk grade of the management body in period.
2. the method according to claim 1, wherein the food safety of the management body checks that information includes day
It often checks data, illegal investigation data and examines detection data；
The current check data include operation qualification, business operation condition, practitioner, the production environment to the management body
Check that number and inspection result, the illegal investigation data include illegal number, illicit content and the punishment of the management body
As a result, the inspection detection data include to the detection data of the managed product of the management body and the detection data with
The different information of national standard.
3. according to the method described in claim 2, it is characterized in that, the business scope according to the management body and described
The food safety of management body checks information, determines that the food safety risk grade of the management body includes:
The food safety static parameter of the management body is obtained according to the business scope of the management body；
According to the current check data of the management body, illegal investigation data and detection data is examined to respectively obtain the operation
The first food safety dynamic parameter, the second food safety dynamic parameter and the third food safety dynamic parameter of main body；
To food safety static parameter, the first food safety dynamic parameter, second food peace of the management body
Full dynamic parameter and the third food safety dynamic parameter are weighted, and obtain the food safety risk etc. of the management body
Grade.
4. the method according to claim 1, wherein the method also includes:
According to the food safety risk grade of the management body described in the first time period, the institute in second time period is determined
State the food safety warning grade of management body.
5. according to the method described in claim 4, it is characterized in that, when the first time period be current year, described second
When period is next time of the current year, the food of basis management body in the first time period
Security risk grade determines that the food safety warning grade of the management body described in second time period includes:
Obtain management body food safety risk grade over the years；
The food safety risk grade over the years to the management body is averaged, and obtains management body food safety over the years
The average value of risk class；
The food safety wind of management body described in the food safety risk grade of the management body described in a upper time, current year
The average value of dangerous grade and management body food safety risk grade over the years is weighted, and is obtained one under the management body
The food safety warning grade in time.
6. according to the method described in claim 4, it is characterized in that, the food safety to a time on the management body
The average value of risk class, the food safety risk grade of the current year and the management body food safety risk grade
It is weighted, the food safety risk grade for obtaining a management body lower time includes:
The food safety risk grade in a management body lower time is obtained using the first formula, first formula includes:
Mnext=α Mpre+βMcurr+λMave, st: alpha+beta+λ=1；
Wherein, MnextIndicate the food safety risk grade in a management body lower time, MpreIt indicates on the management body
The food safety risk grade in one time, McurrIndicate the food safety risk grade of the management body current year, MaveTable
Show that the average value of the management body food safety risk grade, α, β and λ indicate weighted factor.
7. a kind of food safety risk grade determining device characterized by comprising
First obtains module, for obtaining the title and business scope of management body；
Second obtains module, for the title according to the management body, obtains in first time period to the management body
Food safety check information；
First determining module, for being believed according to the business scope of the management body and the food safety inspection of the management body
Breath determines the food safety risk grade of the management body described in the first time period.
8. device according to claim 7, which is characterized in that first determining module includes:
Static parameter acquisition submodule, the food for obtaining the management body according to the business scope of the management body are pacified
Full static parameter；
Dynamic parameter acquisition submodule, for the current check data, illegal investigation data and inspection according to the management body
Detection data respectively obtains the first food safety dynamic parameter, the second food safety dynamic parameter and third of the management body
Food safety dynamic parameter；
First weighting submodule, for food safety static parameter, first food safety dynamic to the management body
Parameter, the second food safety dynamic parameter and the third food safety dynamic parameter are weighted, and obtain the operation
The food safety risk grade of main body.
9. device according to claim 7, which is characterized in that described device further include: the second determining module is used for basis
The food safety risk grade of the management body in the first time period determines the operation master in second time period
The food safety warning grade of body.
10. device according to claim 9, which is characterized in that second determining module includes:
Acquisition submodule, for obtaining management body food safety risk grade over the years；
Average submodule obtains the operation for being averaged to management body food safety risk grade over the years
The average value of main body food safety risk grade over the years；
Second weighting submodule, for described in the food safety risk grade of the management body described in a upper time, current year
The average value of the food safety risk grade of management body and management body food safety risk grade over the years is weighted,
Obtain the food safety warning grade in a management body lower time.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201711379992.3A CN109948870A (en) | 2017-12-20 | 2017-12-20 | Food safety risk grade determines method and device |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201711379992.3A CN109948870A (en) | 2017-12-20 | 2017-12-20 | Food safety risk grade determines method and device |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN109948870A true CN109948870A (en) | 2019-06-28 |
Family
ID=67003928
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201711379992.3A Pending CN109948870A (en) | 2017-12-20 | 2017-12-20 | Food safety risk grade determines method and device |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN109948870A (en) |
Cited By (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN110348733A (en) * | 2019-07-09 | 2019-10-18 | 上海秒针网络科技有限公司 | The determination method and device of checks sequence |
| CN110363435A (en) * | 2019-07-16 | 2019-10-22 | 华中农业大学 | A kind of food safety appraisal procedure of multi-source information |
| CN110516969A (en) * | 2019-08-29 | 2019-11-29 | 行吟信息科技（上海）有限公司 | A kind of risk control rewards and punishments method, system and platform |
| CN111340652A (en) * | 2020-02-27 | 2020-06-26 | 杭州祐全科技发展有限公司 | Meal diet safety dynamic supervision method based on big data analysis |
| CN112465264A (en) * | 2020-12-07 | 2021-03-09 | 湖北省食品质量安全监督检验研究院 | Food safety risk grade prediction method and device and electronic equipment |
| CN116596300A (en) * | 2023-04-19 | 2023-08-15 | 浙江物芯数科信息产业有限公司 | Intelligent supervision method, system, equipment and medium for food production enterprises |
Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20080140514A1 (en) * | 2006-12-11 | 2008-06-12 | Grant Thornton Llp | Method and system for risk evaluation and management |
| CN106203827A (en) * | 2016-07-05 | 2016-12-07 | 杨林 | A kind of food safety risk early warning system |
| CN106651190A (en) * | 2016-12-28 | 2017-05-10 | 深圳微众税银信息服务有限公司 | Enterprise risk level assessment method and system |
-
2017
- 2017-12-20 CN CN201711379992.3A patent/CN109948870A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20080140514A1 (en) * | 2006-12-11 | 2008-06-12 | Grant Thornton Llp | Method and system for risk evaluation and management |
| CN106203827A (en) * | 2016-07-05 | 2016-12-07 | 杨林 | A kind of food safety risk early warning system |
| CN106651190A (en) * | 2016-12-28 | 2017-05-10 | 深圳微众税银信息服务有限公司 | Enterprise risk level assessment method and system |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
| Title |
|---|
| 无: "食品药品监管总局关于印发食品生产经营风险分级管理办法（试行）的通知", 《政府门户网站》 * |
Cited By (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN110348733A (en) * | 2019-07-09 | 2019-10-18 | 上海秒针网络科技有限公司 | The determination method and device of checks sequence |
| CN110363435A (en) * | 2019-07-16 | 2019-10-22 | 华中农业大学 | A kind of food safety appraisal procedure of multi-source information |
| CN110516969A (en) * | 2019-08-29 | 2019-11-29 | 行吟信息科技（上海）有限公司 | A kind of risk control rewards and punishments method, system and platform |
| CN111340652A (en) * | 2020-02-27 | 2020-06-26 | 杭州祐全科技发展有限公司 | Meal diet safety dynamic supervision method based on big data analysis |
| CN112465264A (en) * | 2020-12-07 | 2021-03-09 | 湖北省食品质量安全监督检验研究院 | Food safety risk grade prediction method and device and electronic equipment |
| CN116596300A (en) * | 2023-04-19 | 2023-08-15 | 浙江物芯数科信息产业有限公司 | Intelligent supervision method, system, equipment and medium for food production enterprises |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN109948870A (en) | Food safety risk grade determines method and device | |
| Zeraatkar et al. | Red and processed meat consumption and risk for all-cause mortality and cardiometabolic outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies | |
| Marques et al. | Household food insecurity: a systematic review of the measuring instruments used in epidemiological studies | |
| Grundke et al. | Hidden protectionism? Evidence from non-tariff barriers to trade in the United States | |
| Bilska et al. | Analysis of the behaviors of polish consumers in relation to food waste | |
| Wozniak et al. | Vegetarian, pescatarian and flexitarian diets: sociodemographic determinants and association with cardiovascular risk factors in a Swiss urban population | |
| Baer et al. | Underreporting of psychopathology on the MMPI-2: A meta-analytic review. | |
| Bertin et al. | Dietary patterns of French adults: associations with demographic, socio‐economic and behavioural factors | |
| Schinkel | Prepression: The actuarial archive and new technologies of security | |
| Liese et al. | Environmental influences on fruit and vegetable intake: results from a path analytic model | |
| Stricker et al. | Scientific misconduct in psychology | |
| Slawson et al. | Intense practice enhances accuracy of portion size estimation of amorphous foods | |
| Alviola IV et al. | Food deserts and childhood obesity | |
| CN112053756B (en) | Clinical specimen inspection data-based inspection result quality evaluation method and system | |
| Parisi et al. | Chemistry and food safety in the EU: The rapid alert system for food and feed (RASFF) | |
| Marano-Marcolini et al. | A consumer-oriented model for analysing the suitability of food classification systems | |
| Soo et al. | Eating behaviour, body image, and self-esteem of adolescent girls in Malaysia | |
| Kent et al. | Development, validation and reproducibility of a food frequency questionnaire to measure flavonoid intake in older Australian adults | |
| Fritz et al. | How to dampen the surge of non-communicable diseases in Southeast Asia: insights from a systematic review and meta-analysis | |
| CN109636440B (en) | Commodity satisfaction evaluation method and device, storage medium and electronic equipment | |
| Scott et al. | Food insecurity/food insufficiency: An empirical examination of alternative measures of food problems in impoverished US households | |
| Bindt | Costs and benefits of the food fraud vulnerability assessment in the Dutch food supply chain | |
| CN114203307A (en) | Subject distribution method and system and electronic equipment | |
| Wilson et al. | Comparing screening and preventive health behaviors in two study populations: daughters of mothers with breast cancer and women responding to the behavioral risk factor surveillance system survey | |
| Becker | US food and agricultural imports: safeguards and selected issues |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |
Application publication date: 20190628 |