CN109946029B - A multi-frequency fatigue test method for turbochargers - Google Patents

A multi-frequency fatigue test method for turbochargers Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN109946029B
CN109946029B CN201910133457.2A CN201910133457A CN109946029B CN 109946029 B CN109946029 B CN 109946029B CN 201910133457 A CN201910133457 A CN 201910133457A CN 109946029 B CN109946029 B CN 109946029B
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
matrix
mass
equation
excitation
blade
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
CN201910133457.2A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN109946029A (en
Inventor
李伟
邢鑫鑫
杲宁
孙锐
周思奇
李萌
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Beijing Institute of Technology BIT
Original Assignee
Beijing Institute of Technology BIT
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Beijing Institute of Technology BIT filed Critical Beijing Institute of Technology BIT
Priority to CN201910133457.2A priority Critical patent/CN109946029B/en
Publication of CN109946029A publication Critical patent/CN109946029A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN109946029B publication Critical patent/CN109946029B/en
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Investigating Strength Of Materials By Application Of Mechanical Stress (AREA)

Abstract

本发明公开了一种涡轮增压器的多频疲劳试验方法,在不改变疲劳实验要求的情况下,不同于常用的涡轮增压器多频试验方法去使用调谐质量,而是采用两个或多个本征频率来激励涡轮增压器涡轮转子叶片从而降低疲劳试验时间,减弱了问题的复杂性,确保实验结果具有较高的保真度。另外从不使用调谐质量的角度出发,利用两个或多个本征频率组合同时激励叶片,通过调谐激振力振幅来更加逼真的模拟实际的涡轮增压器涡轮转子叶片空间损伤分布。

Figure 201910133457

The invention discloses a multi-frequency fatigue test method of a turbocharger. Under the condition of not changing the requirements of the fatigue test, it is different from the commonly used multi-frequency test method of a turbocharger to use the tuning quality, but adopts two or Multiple eigenfrequencies to excite turbocharger turbine rotor blades reduce fatigue test time, reduce problem complexity, and ensure high fidelity of experimental results. In addition, from the perspective of not using the tuning mass, two or more eigenfrequency combinations are used to excite the blades simultaneously, and the spatial damage distribution of the actual turbocharger turbine rotor blades can be simulated more realistically by tuning the excitation force amplitude.

Figure 201910133457

Description

一种涡轮增压器的多频疲劳试验方法A multi-frequency fatigue test method for turbochargers

技术领域technical field

本发明是关于叶片疲劳试验方法,特别是关于涡轮增压器涡轮转子叶片多频疲劳试验方法,属于试验测试领域。The invention relates to a blade fatigue test method, in particular to a multi-frequency fatigue test method of a turbine rotor blade of a turbocharger, and belongs to the field of testing and testing.

背景技术Background technique

转子叶片是涡轮的关键部件之一,它被要求具有高的可靠性,而叶片的使用寿命在很大程度上取决于其疲劳寿命。因此,对涡轮转子叶片进行疲劳试验非常必要。The rotor blade is one of the key components of the turbine, which is required to have high reliability, and the service life of the blade is largely determined by its fatigue life. Therefore, fatigue testing of turbine rotor blades is necessary.

现有的涡轮叶片疲劳试验方法,主要是进行全尺寸叶片试验,基于一个典型的旋转质量来激励叶片达到共振激励的目的,进而实现叶片的疲劳测试。当前测试方法仅利用最低本征频率引起虚拟损伤,附加调谐质量被用来恢复真实的损伤分布,即使采用振幅放大技术来进行疲劳试验,仍然花费较多时间。现有的关于涡轮转子叶片的疲劳试验中,调谐质量的应用增加了疲劳试验的复杂性,它降低了叶片的固有频率,从而增加了测试时间。The existing turbine blade fatigue test methods are mainly to carry out full-scale blade tests, based on a typical rotating mass to excite the blades to achieve the purpose of resonance excitation, and then realize the fatigue test of the blades. Current testing methods only use the lowest eigenfrequency to induce virtual damage, and additional tuning masses are used to recover the true damage distribution. Even if amplitude amplification techniques are used to perform fatigue tests, it still takes a lot of time. In the existing fatigue testing of turbine rotor blades, the application of tuning mass increases the complexity of fatigue testing, which reduces the natural frequency of the blade, thereby increasing the testing time.

因此,一种从降低疲劳试验时间,确保较高的保真度,而不使用调谐质量的角度出发,利用两个或多个本征频率组合同时激励叶片,通过调谐激振力振幅来更加逼真的模拟实际的空间损伤分布的新的疲劳试验方法亟待建立。Therefore, from the perspective of reducing fatigue test time and ensuring higher fidelity without using tuning masses, a combination of two or more eigenfrequency combinations is used to excite the blade simultaneously, and the excitation force amplitude can be tuned for more fidelity. A new fatigue test method that simulates the actual spatial damage distribution needs to be established.

发明内容SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

有鉴于此,本发明提供了一种涡轮增压器的多频疲劳试验方法,采用叶片固定结构、待测叶片和本征频率激励结构进行试验,所述待测叶片一端固定于所述固定结构上,所述本征频率激励结构为设置于所述待测叶片下方的促动器或至少两个设置于所述待测叶片上方的激振器;In view of this, the present invention provides a multi-frequency fatigue test method of a turbocharger, which adopts a blade fixing structure, a blade to be tested and an eigenfrequency excitation structure for testing, and one end of the blade to be tested is fixed to the fixed structure above, the eigenfrequency excitation structure is an actuator arranged below the blade to be measured or at least two exciters arranged above the blade to be measured;

具体步骤如下:Specific steps are as follows:

步骤1:对叶片进行离散化处理,将整个叶片问题进行简化。采用二维集块质量模型对叶片进行离散化处理,得到叶片的离散化质量模型,其中

Figure BDA0001976182320000021
为基本质量矩阵元素,
Figure BDA0001976182320000022
为第k个附加调谐质量矩阵,
Figure BDA0001976182320000023
为第k次调谐元素或激励质量矩阵,EI(z)为摆动弯曲刚度,c(z)为弦长,m(z)为每单位长度的叶片质量,该模型是在多范式数值计算环境Matlabv.15a中生成,它由n=100个节点组成,L为叶片总长度,在△z=L/n时等距,△z为相邻节点之间的等距距离,每个节点在x方向上具有一个平移自由度,该模型所示的集中质量系统在双频激励下的动态响应,用点符号表示的非线性二阶微分方程描述如下:Step 1: Discretize the blade to simplify the entire blade problem. The two-dimensional mass model is used to discretize the blade, and the discretized mass model of the blade is obtained, where
Figure BDA0001976182320000021
is the element of the basic mass matrix,
Figure BDA0001976182320000022
is the kth additional tuning quality matrix,
Figure BDA0001976182320000023
is the k-th tuning element or excitation mass matrix, EI(z) is the swing bending stiffness, c(z) is the chord length, m(z) is the blade mass per unit length, the model is in the multi-paradigm numerical computing environment Matlabv .15a, it consists of n=100 nodes, L is the total length of the blade, equidistant when △z=L/n, △z is the equidistant distance between adjacent nodes, each node is in the x direction With one translational degree of freedom on , the dynamic response of the lumped-mass system shown by this model under dual-frequency excitation is described by the nonlinear second-order differential equation represented by dot notation as follows:

Figure BDA0001976182320000024
Figure BDA0001976182320000024

式中:M为总质量矩阵,D为瑞利阻尼系数,A为气动阻尼矩阵,K为刚度矩阵,f1,2为节点激振力幅度矢量,ω1与ω2为第一和第二种模式的角固有特征频率,t为时间,

Figure BDA0001976182320000025
为分量速度矢量的绝对值,
Figure BDA0001976182320000026
为速度矢量,
Figure BDA0001976182320000027
为加速度矢量;In the formula: M is the total mass matrix, D is the Rayleigh damping coefficient, A is the aerodynamic damping matrix, K is the stiffness matrix, f1, 2 are the nodal excitation force amplitude vectors, ω 1 and ω 2 are the first and second types angular natural eigenfrequency of the mode, t is time,
Figure BDA0001976182320000025
is the absolute value of the component velocity vector,
Figure BDA0001976182320000026
is the velocity vector,
Figure BDA0001976182320000027
is the acceleration vector;

步骤2:利用Euler-Bernoulli定理求解刚度矩阵。根据式(2)使用一阶Euler-Bernoulli梁理论,对对称柔度矩阵(zi<zj)的上三角形的每个元素进行半解析处理,其中z为从基部开始的翼展坐标,zi,j为第i个与j个节点的翼展坐标,使用虚功的原理,式(2)表示由节点j施加的单位负荷引起的节点i的变形,式(2)通过使用Simpson's规则的数值积分获得,且柔度矩阵的逆矩阵可得到式(3)所示的刚度矩阵,Step 2: Solve the stiffness matrix using Euler-Bernoulli theorem. Using first-order Euler-Bernoulli beam theory according to equation (2), semi-analytical processing is performed on each element of the upper triangle of the symmetric compliance matrix (z i <z j ), where z is the span coordinate from the base, z i, j are the wingspan coordinates of the i-th and j nodes, using the principle of virtual work, formula (2) represents the deformation of node i caused by the unit load applied by node j, formula (2) by using Simpson's rule Numerical integration is obtained, and the inverse matrix of the compliance matrix can obtain the stiffness matrix shown in Eq. (3),

Figure BDA0001976182320000028
Figure BDA0001976182320000028

K=S-1 (3)K=S -1 (3)

式中,Sij为柔度矩阵元素,S为柔度矩阵,In the formula, S ij is the compliance matrix element, S is the compliance matrix,

步骤3:Step 3:

利用相关函数求解总质量矩阵。叶片的基本质量矩阵的元素

Figure BDA00019761823200000313
可以通过如下公式获得:Solve the total mass matrix using the correlation function. Elements of the basic mass matrix of the blade
Figure BDA00019761823200000313
It can be obtained by the following formula:

Figure BDA0001976182320000031
Figure BDA0001976182320000031

式中,δij为Kronecker函数,集中质量模型公式要求将额外(调谐或激励)质量离散地分配在它的节点上,通过在其两个相邻节点i和i+1之间分配第k个附加质量

Figure BDA0001976182320000032
式(5)被用于计算相应的分配质量矩阵
Figure BDA0001976182320000033
where δij is the Kronecker function, and the lumped-mass model formula requires that additional (tuning or excitation) mass be distributed discretely on its nodes, by distributing the kth mass between its two adjacent nodes i and i+1 Additional quality
Figure BDA0001976182320000032
Equation (5) is used to calculate the corresponding distribution quality matrix
Figure BDA0001976182320000033

Figure BDA0001976182320000034
Figure BDA0001976182320000034

式中,zk为第k个附加质量的坐标,

Figure BDA0001976182320000035
Figure BDA0001976182320000036
为n维正交基向量,
Figure BDA0001976182320000037
Figure BDA0001976182320000038
为i维正交基向量的转置矩阵,zk为第k个翼展坐标,因此,可以获得总质量矩阵M:where z k is the coordinate of the kth additional mass,
Figure BDA0001976182320000035
and
Figure BDA0001976182320000036
is an n-dimensional orthonormal basis vector,
Figure BDA0001976182320000037
and
Figure BDA0001976182320000038
is the transpose matrix of the i-dimensional orthonormal basis vector, and z k is the k-th span coordinate. Therefore, the total mass matrix M can be obtained:

Figure BDA0001976182320000039
Figure BDA0001976182320000039

式中,

Figure BDA00019761823200000310
为基本质量矩阵,
Figure BDA00019761823200000311
为第k个附加调谐或激励质量矩阵,nt为调谐质量数,In the formula,
Figure BDA00019761823200000310
is the basic mass matrix,
Figure BDA00019761823200000311
is the kth additional tuning or excitation mass matrix, n t is the tuning mass number,

步骤4:Step 4:

考虑空气阻尼的影响,计算过程中将阻尼的影响考虑进去。瑞利阻尼以其最常见的形式表述,具体如下所示,Considering the effect of air damping, the effect of damping is taken into account in the calculation process. Rayleigh damping is expressed in its most common form as follows,

D=aM+bK (7)D=aM+bK (7)

上述公式中a=0和b=0.0156,a,b为瑞利阻尼系数,In the above formula, a=0 and b=0.0156, a and b are Rayleigh damping coefficients,

空气动力阻尼矩阵的元素Aij可以通过式(8)获得,其中垂直于流动的平板的Cd=2被作为代表复杂空气动力学情况的保守近似:The element A ij of the aerodynamic damping matrix can be obtained by equation (8), where C d = 2 for the flat plate perpendicular to the flow is taken as a conservative approximation representing the complex aerodynamic situation:

Figure BDA00019761823200000312
Figure BDA00019761823200000312

式中,ρ为环境室温下的空气密度,c(z)为弦长,Cd为90°攻角的气动阻力系数,where ρ is the air density at ambient room temperature, c(z) is the chord length, C d is the aerodynamic drag coefficient at an angle of attack of 90°,

Figure BDA0001976182320000041
Figure BDA0001976182320000041

Figure BDA0001976182320000042
Figure BDA0001976182320000042

通过求解式(9)所提出的众所周知的广义特征值问题,被定义的模型形状的对应特征向量由方程(10)得出,式中φi为第i种模式的n维本征模式向量:步骤5:By solving the well-known generalized eigenvalue problem proposed by Eq. (9), the corresponding eigenvectors of the defined model shapes are obtained by Eq. (10), where φ i is the n-dimensional eigenmode vector of the ith mode: Step 5:

考虑静态弯矩的影响,确保解决问题过程具有更高的可靠性。进行附加参数的计算,由叶片自重引起的静态弯矩分布通过两步程序计算,首先在尖端的边界条件剪切力Q(L)=0时使用方程式(11)计算剪切力Q(z):Taking into account the effects of static bending moments ensures a higher reliability of the problem-solving process. To calculate additional parameters, the static bending moment distribution caused by the blade's own weight is calculated through a two-step procedure. First, the shear force Q(z) is calculated using equation (11) when the boundary condition shear force Q(L) = 0 at the tip. :

Figure BDA0001976182320000043
Figure BDA0001976182320000043

式中,g为重力加速度,m(s)为单位长度的叶片质量,随后使用等式(12)获得力矩分布MS(z),并且边界条件Ms(L)=0:where g is the gravitational acceleration, m(s) is the blade mass per unit length, then the moment distribution M S (z) is obtained using equation (12), and the boundary condition M s (L) = 0:

Figure BDA0001976182320000044
Figure BDA0001976182320000044

式中,MS(z)为自重引起的摆动弯矩,MS(L)为L长度处的自重引起的摆动弯矩,Q(s)为在长度为s下的剪切力,

Figure BDA0001976182320000045
为第k个调谐质量,
Figure BDA0001976182320000046
第k个附加质量的翼展坐标,由外部质量自重引起的静态弯矩分布可以通过公式(13)获得,使用叠加原理,可以通过公式(14)得到产生的静态弯矩:where M S (z) is the swing bending moment caused by self-weight, M S (L) is the swing bending moment caused by self-weight at length L, Q(s) is the shear force at length s,
Figure BDA0001976182320000045
is the kth tuning quality,
Figure BDA0001976182320000046
The wingspan coordinates of the kth additional mass, the static bending moment distribution caused by the self-weight of the external mass can be obtained by formula (13), and using the superposition principle, the generated static bending moment can be obtained by formula (14):

Figure BDA0001976182320000047
Figure BDA0001976182320000047

Figure BDA0001976182320000049
Figure BDA0001976182320000049

式中,Mt(z)为由调谐质量产生的弯矩,

Figure BDA00019761823200000410
为平均(静态)弯矩,用于损伤计算的节点弯矩历程M(z,t)由公式(15)表示,其中节点曲率通过节点位移历程x(z,t)的二阶导数的中心差分来近似获得:where M t (z) is the bending moment generated by the tuning mass,
Figure BDA00019761823200000410
is the average (static) bending moment, the nodal moment history M(z,t) used for damage calculation is expressed by Equation (15), where the nodal curvature is obtained by the central difference of the second derivative of the nodal displacement history x(z,t) to approximate:

Figure BDA0001976182320000051
Figure BDA0001976182320000051

步骤6:Step 6:

求解双激励模式混合度。将峰值应变幅度限制为经验传感器类型特定门槛值,由式(16)给出的均方根应变门槛值

Figure BDA0001976182320000052
在后续讨论的优化过程中被用作约束:Solve for the dual excitation mode mixing degree. Limiting the peak strain amplitude to an empirical sensor type-specific threshold, the rms strain threshold given by Eq. (16)
Figure BDA0001976182320000052
Used as a constraint in the optimization process discussed later:

Figure BDA0001976182320000053
Figure BDA0001976182320000053

其中时间跨度T2-T1对应于时间历程的稳态部分和凸缘的末端纤维的应变历程ε(z,t),应变历程通过一阶Euler的应变-力矩关系获得伯努利梁,如式(17)所示:where the time span T 2 -T 1 corresponds to the steady-state part of the time history and the strain history ε(z,t) of the end fibers of the flange, and the strain history is obtained by a first-order Euler's strain-moment relationship for a Bernoulli beam, as Formula (17) shows:

Figure BDA0001976182320000054
Figure BDA0001976182320000054

式中,xc(z)为末端光纤与弯曲轴之间的距离。where x c (z) is the distance between the end fiber and the bending axis.

在双频激励情况下,两个力振幅之间的比值是由模态混合度来测量,这里定义为In the case of dual frequency excitation, the ratio between the two force amplitudes is measured by the degree of modal mixing, defined here as

Figure BDA0001976182320000055
Figure BDA0001976182320000055

式中,ψ为双激励模式混合度,其中ψ=1是指纯模式-1激励,ψ=0是指纯模式-2激励,F1与F2为激振力振幅,In the formula, ψ is the degree of mixing of dual excitation modes, where ψ=1 means pure mode-1 excitation, ψ=0 means pure mode-2 excitation, F 1 and F 2 are the excitation force amplitudes,

步骤7:Step 7:

在多频疲劳实验方法中,建立设计向量变量与相关参数的关系式,并从能量与实际损伤分布的角度建立最终疲劳失效的非线性约束。In the multi-frequency fatigue experiment method, the relationship between the design vector variables and the relevant parameters is established, and the nonlinear constraint of the final fatigue failure is established from the perspective of energy and actual damage distribution.

在双频方法中,设计变量向量q由两个激振力大小组成:激励位置和比例因子,它由方程(19)给出:In the two-frequency method, the design variable vector q consists of two excitation force magnitudes: excitation location and scale factor, which is given by equation (19):

Figure BDA0001976182320000061
Figure BDA0001976182320000061

式中,w为比例因子,总节点循环数向量和总测试时间以及总耗散能量由公式(20)至(24)给出,且多频方法的目标函数符合式(25),多频情况下的节点循环数随叶片变化而变化,因此,式(28)中的非线性约束要求最小节点周期数等于或大于3×106循环基准:In the formula, w is the scale factor, the total node cycle number vector and the total test time and the total dissipated energy are given by formulas (20) to (24), and the objective function of the multi-frequency method conforms to the formula (25), the multi-frequency case The number of nodal cycles under , varies with the blade, so the nonlinear constraint in Eq. (28) requires that the minimum number of nodal cycles be equal to or greater than the 3 × 10 cycle basis:

Figure BDA0001976182320000062
Figure BDA0001976182320000062

Ttot=w(T2-T1) (21)T tot =w(T 2 -T 1 ) (21)

Figure BDA0001976182320000063
Figure BDA0001976182320000063

Figure BDA0001976182320000064
Figure BDA0001976182320000064

Figure BDA0001976182320000065
Figure BDA0001976182320000065

Figure BDA0001976182320000066
Figure BDA0001976182320000066

式中,Nrs为单元rs中的周期数,ntot为总节点循环数向量,Ttot为总测试时间,Etot为总能量消耗,D为实际损伤指数(当D=1时达到疲劳破坏),Eaer为空气动力能量耗散,Estr为结构能量耗散,Dt为目标损伤指数In the formula, N rs is the number of cycles in the unit rs, n tot is the total node cycle number vector, T tot is the total test time, E tot is the total energy consumption, D is the actual damage index (when D = 1, the fatigue failure is reached. ), E aer is the aerodynamic energy dissipation, E str is the structural energy dissipation, D t is the target damage index

最小f(q)服从于The minimum f(q) is subject to

3×106-ntot(q)=0 (26)3×10 6 -n tot (q)=0 (26)

Figure BDA0001976182320000067
Figure BDA0001976182320000067

Figure BDA0001976182320000068
Figure BDA0001976182320000068

式中,

Figure BDA0001976182320000069
为时间历程的均方根应变值,x100为末端光纤与弯曲轴之间的距离为100mm。In the formula,
Figure BDA0001976182320000069
is the rms strain value of the time history, and x 100 is the distance between the end fiber and the bending axis of 100 mm.

附图说明Description of drawings

为了更清楚地说明本发明实施例或现有技术中的技术方案,下面将对实施例或现有技术描述中所需要使用的附图作简单地介绍,显而易见地,下面描述中的附图仅仅是本发明的实施例,对于本领域普通技术人员来讲,在不付出创造性劳动的前提下,还可以根据提供的附图获得其他的附图,In order to explain the embodiments of the present invention or the technical solutions in the prior art more clearly, the following briefly introduces the accompanying drawings that need to be used in the description of the embodiments or the prior art. Obviously, the accompanying drawings in the following description are only It is an embodiment of the present invention. For those of ordinary skill in the art, other drawings can also be obtained according to the provided drawings without creative work.

图1a附图为常规单频疲劳测试装置;The accompanying drawing of Fig. 1a is a conventional single-frequency fatigue test device;

图1b附图为使用旋转质量激励的多频疲劳测试装置;Figure 1b is a multi-frequency fatigue test device using rotating mass excitation;

图1c附图为可用于单频和多频激励的地面驱动;Figure 1c shows the ground drive that can be used for single-frequency and multi-frequency excitation;

图2a附图为用于气动阻尼的相关节点平面面积示意图;Figure 2a is a schematic diagram of the plane area of the relevant nodes used for aerodynamic damping;

图2b附图为相关联的节片质量示意图;Figure 2b is a schematic diagram of the associated segment quality;

图2c附图为叶片的离散化质量模型。Figure 2c shows the discretized mass model of the blade.

其中,1-固定结构,2-待测叶片,3-激振器,4-促动器,,5相关节点平面面积。Among them, 1-fixed structure, 2-blade to be tested, 3-exciter, 4-actuator, 5-plane area of relevant nodes.

具体实施方式Detailed ways

下面将对本发明实施例中的技术方案进行清楚、完整地描述,显然,所描述的实施例仅仅是本发明一部分实施例,而不是全部的实施例,基于本发明中的实施例,本领域普通技术人员在没有做出创造性劳动前提下所获得的所有其他实施例,都属于本发明保护的范围,The technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention will be clearly and completely described below. Obviously, the described embodiments are only a part of the embodiments of the present invention, rather than all the embodiments. All other embodiments obtained by the technical personnel without creative work, all belong to the protection scope of the present invention,

图1a-图1b展示了对于涡轮叶片的不同疲劳测试装置及方法,在图中

Figure BDA0001976182320000071
为第k次调谐质量(k=1,2……),
Figure BDA0001976182320000072
为第k个附加质量的翼展坐标,ωi为第i种模式的角自然特征频率(i=1,2……),F1,2为激振力幅度。图1(a)为工业中最常用的单频疲劳测试装置及方法,基于已有的单频疲劳试验装置,构建新的涡轮装置叶片的多频疲劳试验装置。图1(b)与(c)展示了多频测试方法的两种应用。Figures 1a-1b show different fatigue testing devices and methods for turbine blades, in the figure
Figure BDA0001976182320000071
is the kth tuning quality (k=1, 2...),
Figure BDA0001976182320000072
is the wingspan coordinate of the kth additional mass, ω i is the angular natural characteristic frequency of the i-th mode (i=1, 2...), and F 1,2 is the amplitude of the exciting force. Figure 1(a) shows the most commonly used single-frequency fatigue test device and method in the industry. Based on the existing single-frequency fatigue test device, a new multi-frequency fatigue test device for turbine blades is constructed. Figures 1(b) and (c) show two applications of the multi-frequency test method.

具体测试步骤如下:The specific test steps are as follows:

步骤1:step 1:

对叶片进行离散化处理,将整个叶片问题进行简化。基于已有的多频试验装置,采用二维集块质量模型对叶片进行离散化处理,得到叶片的离散化质量模型。如图2所示,图中

Figure BDA0001976182320000081
为基本质量矩阵元素,
Figure BDA0001976182320000082
为第k个附加调谐质量矩阵,
Figure BDA0001976182320000083
为第k次调谐元素或激励质量矩阵,EI(z)为摆动弯曲刚度,c(z)为弦长,m(z)为每单位长度的叶片质量。该模型是在多范式数值计算环境Matlab v.15a中生成的,它由n=100个节点组成,L为叶片总长度,在△z=L/n时等距,△z为相邻节点之间的等距距离。每个节点在x方向上具有一个平移自由度。该模型所示的集中质量系统在双频激励下的动态响应,可以用点符号表示的非线性二阶微分方程描述如下:Discretize the blade to simplify the entire blade problem. Based on the existing multi-frequency test device, a two-dimensional mass model is used to discretize the blade, and the discretized quality model of the blade is obtained. As shown in Figure 2, the figure
Figure BDA0001976182320000081
is the element of the basic mass matrix,
Figure BDA0001976182320000082
is the kth additional tuning quality matrix,
Figure BDA0001976182320000083
is the kth tuning element or excitation mass matrix, EI(z) is the oscillating bending stiffness, c(z) is the chord length, and m(z) is the blade mass per unit length. The model is generated in the multi-paradigm numerical computing environment Matlab v.15a, it consists of n=100 nodes, L is the total length of the blade, equidistant when △z=L/n, △z is the distance between adjacent nodes equidistant distance between. Each node has one translational degree of freedom in the x-direction. The dynamic response of the lumped-mass system shown by this model under dual-frequency excitation can be described by a nonlinear second-order differential equation represented by dot notation as follows:

Figure BDA0001976182320000084
Figure BDA0001976182320000084

式中:M为总质量矩阵,D为瑞利阻尼系数,A为气动阻尼矩阵,K为刚度矩阵,f1,2为节点激振力幅度矢量,ω1与ω2为第一和第二种模式的角固有特征频率,t为时间,

Figure BDA0001976182320000085
为分量速度矢量的绝对值,
Figure BDA0001976182320000086
为速度矢量,
Figure BDA0001976182320000087
为加速度矢量;In the formula: M is the total mass matrix, D is the Rayleigh damping coefficient, A is the aerodynamic damping matrix, K is the stiffness matrix, f 1,2 is the node excitation force amplitude vector, ω 1 and ω 2 are the first and second the angular natural eigenfrequencies of the modes, t is time,
Figure BDA0001976182320000085
is the absolute value of the component velocity vector,
Figure BDA0001976182320000086
is the velocity vector,
Figure BDA0001976182320000087
is the acceleration vector;

步骤2:Step 2:

利用Euler-Bernoulli定理求解刚度矩阵。根据式(2)使用一阶Euler-Bernoulli梁理论,对对称柔度矩阵(zi<zj)的上三角形的每个元素进行半解析处理,其中z为从基部开始的翼展坐标,zi,j为第i个与j个节点的翼展坐标。使用虚功的原理,式(2)表示由节点j施加的单位负荷引起的节点i的变形。式(2)通过使用Simpson's规则的数值积分获得,且柔度矩阵的逆矩阵可得到式(3)所示的刚度矩阵。The stiffness matrix is solved using the Euler-Bernoulli theorem. Using first-order Euler-Bernoulli beam theory according to equation (2), semi-analytical processing is performed on each element of the upper triangle of the symmetric compliance matrix (z i <z j ), where z is the span coordinate from the base, z i, j are the wingspan coordinates of the ith and j nodes. Using the principle of virtual work, Equation (2) represents the deformation of node i caused by the unit load applied by node j. Equation (2) is obtained by numerical integration using Simpson's rule, and the inverse matrix of the compliance matrix can obtain the stiffness matrix shown in Equation (3).

Figure BDA0001976182320000088
Figure BDA0001976182320000088

K=S-1 (3)K=S -1 (3)

式中,Sij为柔度矩阵元素,S为柔度矩阵,In the formula, S ij is the compliance matrix element, S is the compliance matrix,

步骤3:Step 3:

利用相关函数求解总质量矩阵。叶片的基本质量矩阵的元素

Figure BDA0001976182320000091
可以通过如下公式获得:Solve the total mass matrix using the correlation function. Elements of the basic mass matrix of the blade
Figure BDA0001976182320000091
It can be obtained by the following formula:

Figure BDA0001976182320000092
Figure BDA0001976182320000092

式中,δij为Kronecker函数,集中质量模型公式要求将额外(调谐或激励)质量离散地分配在它的节点上。通过在其两个相邻节点i和i+1之间分配第k个附加质量

Figure BDA0001976182320000093
式(5)被用于计算相应的分配质量矩阵,where δ ij is the Kronecker function, and the lumped-mass model formulation requires that additional (tuned or excited) masses be distributed discretely on its nodes. By distributing the kth additional mass between its two neighbors i and i+1
Figure BDA0001976182320000093
Equation (5) is used to calculate the corresponding distribution quality matrix,

Figure BDA0001976182320000094
Figure BDA0001976182320000094

式中,zk为第k个附加质量的坐标,

Figure BDA0001976182320000095
Figure BDA0001976182320000096
为n维正交基向量,
Figure BDA0001976182320000097
Figure BDA0001976182320000098
为i维正交基向量的转置矩阵,zk为第k个翼展坐标,因此,可以获得总质量矩阵M:where z k is the coordinate of the kth additional mass,
Figure BDA0001976182320000095
and
Figure BDA0001976182320000096
is an n-dimensional orthonormal basis vector,
Figure BDA0001976182320000097
and
Figure BDA0001976182320000098
is the transpose matrix of the i-dimensional orthonormal basis vector, and z k is the k-th span coordinate. Therefore, the total mass matrix M can be obtained:

Figure BDA0001976182320000099
Figure BDA0001976182320000099

式中,

Figure BDA00019761823200000910
为基本质量矩阵,
Figure BDA00019761823200000911
为第k个附加调谐或激励质量矩阵,nt为调谐质量数。In the formula,
Figure BDA00019761823200000910
is the basic mass matrix,
Figure BDA00019761823200000911
is the kth additional tuning or excitation mass matrix, and n t is the tuning mass number.

步骤4:Step 4:

考虑空气阻尼的影响,计算过程中将阻尼的影响考虑进去。瑞利阻尼以其最常见的形式表述,具体如下所示,Considering the effect of air damping, the effect of damping is taken into account in the calculation process. Rayleigh damping is expressed in its most common form as follows,

D=aM+bK (7)D=aM+bK (7)

上述公式中a=0和b=0.0156,a,b为瑞利阻尼系数。In the above formula, a=0 and b=0.0156, a and b are Rayleigh damping coefficients.

空气动力阻尼矩阵的元素Aij可以通过式(8)获得,其中垂直于流动的平板的Cd=2被作为代表复杂空气动力学情况的保守近似:The element A ij of the aerodynamic damping matrix can be obtained by equation (8), where C d = 2 for the flat plate perpendicular to the flow is taken as a conservative approximation representing the complex aerodynamic situation:

Figure BDA0001976182320000101
Figure BDA0001976182320000101

式中,ρ为环境室温下的空气密度,c(z)为弦长,Cd为90°攻角的气动阻力系数。where ρ is the air density at ambient room temperature, c(z) is the chord length, and C d is the aerodynamic drag coefficient at an angle of attack of 90°.

Figure BDA0001976182320000102
Figure BDA0001976182320000102

Figure BDA0001976182320000103
Figure BDA0001976182320000103

通过求解式(9)所提出的众所周知的广义特征值问题,被定义的模型形状的对应特征向量由方程(10)得出,式中φi为第i种模式的n维本征模式向量:步骤5:By solving the well-known generalized eigenvalue problem proposed by Eq. (9), the corresponding eigenvectors of the defined model shapes are obtained by Eq. (10), where φ i is the n-dimensional eigenmode vector of the ith mode: Step 5:

考虑静态弯矩的影响,确保解决问题过程具有更高的可靠性。进行附加参数的计算,由叶片自重引起的静态弯矩分布通过两步程序计算。Taking into account the effects of static bending moments ensures a higher reliability of the problem-solving process. The calculation of additional parameters is carried out, and the static bending moment distribution caused by the dead weight of the blade is calculated by a two-step procedure.

首先在尖端的边界条件剪切力Q(L)=0时使用方程式(11)计算剪切力Q(z):The shear force Q(z) is first calculated using equation (11) when the boundary condition shear force Q(L) = 0 at the tip:

Figure BDA0001976182320000104
Figure BDA0001976182320000104

式中,g为重力加速度,m(s)为单位长度的叶片质量,随后使用等式(12)获得力矩分布MS(z),并且边界条件Ms(L)=0:where g is the gravitational acceleration, m(s) is the blade mass per unit length, then the moment distribution M S (z) is obtained using equation (12), and the boundary condition M s (L) = 0:

Figure BDA0001976182320000105
Figure BDA0001976182320000105

式中,MS(z)为自重引起的摆动弯矩,MS(L)为L长度处的自重引起的摆动弯矩,Q(s)为在长度为s下的剪切力,由外部质量自重引起的静态弯矩分布可以通过公式(13)获得,使用叠加原理,可以通过公式(14)得到产生的静态弯矩:In the formula, M S (z) is the swing bending moment caused by self-weight, M S (L) is the swing bending moment caused by self-weight at length L, Q(s) is the shear force at length s, which is determined by the external The static bending moment distribution caused by the weight of the mass can be obtained by formula (13), and using the superposition principle, the resulting static bending moment can be obtained by formula (14):

Figure BDA0001976182320000106
Figure BDA0001976182320000106

Figure BDA0001976182320000111
Figure BDA0001976182320000111

式中,

Figure BDA0001976182320000112
为第k个调谐质量,
Figure BDA0001976182320000113
第k个附加质量的翼展坐标,Mt(z)为由调谐质量产生的弯矩,
Figure BDA0001976182320000114
为平均(静态)弯矩。用于损伤计算的节点弯矩历程M(z,t)由公式(15)表示,其中节点曲率通过节点位移历程x(z,t)的二阶导数的中心差分来近似获得:In the formula,
Figure BDA0001976182320000112
is the kth tuning quality,
Figure BDA0001976182320000113
Wingspan coordinate of the kth additional mass, M t (z) is the bending moment produced by the tuned mass,
Figure BDA0001976182320000114
is the average (static) bending moment. The nodal moment history M(z,t) used for damage calculation is represented by Equation (15), where the nodal curvature is approximated by the central difference of the second derivative of the nodal displacement history x(z,t):

Figure BDA0001976182320000115
Figure BDA0001976182320000115

步骤6:Step 6:

求解双激励模式混合度。应变传感器的使用寿命会因测试中断和设备更换而影响测试时间。因此,将峰值应变幅度限制为经验传感器类型特定门槛值,由式(16)给出的均方根应变门槛值

Figure BDA0001976182320000116
在后续讨论的优化过程中被用作约束:Solve for the dual excitation mode mixing degree. The service life of the strain sensor can affect the test time due to test interruptions and equipment replacement. Therefore, the peak strain amplitude is limited to an empirical sensor type-specific threshold, the rms strain threshold given by Eq. (16)
Figure BDA0001976182320000116
Used as a constraint in the optimization process discussed later:

Figure BDA0001976182320000117
Figure BDA0001976182320000117

其中时间跨度T2-T1对应于时间历程的稳态部分和凸缘的末端纤维的应变历程ε(z,t),应变历程通过一阶Euler的应变-力矩关系获得伯努利梁,如式(17)所示:where the time span T 2 -T 1 corresponds to the steady-state part of the time history and the strain history ε(z,t) of the end fibers of the flange, and the strain history is obtained by a first-order Euler's strain-moment relationship for a Bernoulli beam, as Formula (17) shows:

Figure BDA0001976182320000118
Figure BDA0001976182320000118

式中,xc(z)为末端光纤与弯曲轴之间的距离。where x c (z) is the distance between the end fiber and the bending axis.

在双频激励情况下,两个力振幅之间的比值是由模态混合度来测量,这里定义为In the case of dual frequency excitation, the ratio between the two force amplitudes is measured by the degree of modal mixing, defined here as

Figure BDA0001976182320000119
Figure BDA0001976182320000119

式中,ψ为双激励模式混合度,其中ψ=1是指纯模式-1激励,ψ=0是指纯模式-2激励,F1与F2为激振力振幅,In the formula, ψ is the degree of mixing of dual excitation modes, where ψ=1 means pure mode-1 excitation, ψ=0 means pure mode-2 excitation, F 1 and F 2 are the excitation force amplitudes,

步骤7:Step 7:

在多频疲劳实验方法中,建立设计向量变量与相关参数的关系式,并从能量与实际损伤分布的角度建立最终疲劳失效的非线性约束。In the multi-frequency fatigue experiment method, the relationship between the design vector variables and the relevant parameters is established, and the nonlinear constraint of the final fatigue failure is established from the perspective of energy and actual damage distribution.

疲劳试验必须满足四个一般约束条件,这些约束条件可以被粗略地概括为最小循环次数,最大应变门槛值,空间损伤分布和绝热加热的限制。为了找到满足上述约束的解决方案,需要数值优化算法以达到足够的准确度和效率。对于目前的问题,利用Matlab优化器fmincon进行非线性约束优化。默认情况下,fmincon通过有限差分来计算Hessian矩阵,假设由于模型的半解析公式而导致小的有限差分误差,则该差分是合理的。在双频率的情况下,叶片同时受到两个激振力激励。在双频方法中,设计变量向量q由两个激振力大小组成:激励位置和比例因子,它由方程(19)给出:Fatigue testing must satisfy four general constraints, which can be roughly summarized as the minimum number of cycles, the maximum strain threshold, the spatial damage distribution, and the limits of adiabatic heating. To find a solution that satisfies the above constraints, numerical optimization algorithms are required to achieve sufficient accuracy and efficiency. For the current problem, the Matlab optimizer fmincon is used for nonlinear constrained optimization. By default, fmincon computes the Hessian by finite difference, which is reasonable assuming a small finite difference error due to the semi-analytical formulation of the model. In the case of dual frequencies, the blade is excited by two excitation forces simultaneously. In the two-frequency method, the design variable vector q consists of two excitation force magnitudes: excitation location and scale factor, which is given by equation (19):

Figure BDA0001976182320000121
Figure BDA0001976182320000121

式中,w为比例因子。总节点循环数向量和总测试时间以及总耗散能量由公式(20)至(24)给出,且多频方法的目标函数符合式(25)。多频情况下的节点循环数随叶片变化而变化。因此,式(28)中的非线性约束要求最小节点周期数等于或大于3×106循环基准:In the formula, w is the scale factor. The total node cycle number vector and total test time and total dissipated energy are given by equations (20) to (24), and the objective function of the multi-frequency method conforms to equation (25). The number of nodal cycles in the multi-frequency case varies with the blade. Therefore, the nonlinear constraint in Eq. (28) requires that the minimum number of nodal cycles be equal to or greater than the 3×10 6 cycle basis:

Figure BDA0001976182320000122
Figure BDA0001976182320000122

Ttot=w(T2-T1) (21)T tot =w(T 2 -T 1 ) (21)

Figure BDA0001976182320000123
Figure BDA0001976182320000123

Figure BDA0001976182320000124
Figure BDA0001976182320000124

Figure BDA0001976182320000125
Figure BDA0001976182320000125

Figure BDA0001976182320000131
Figure BDA0001976182320000131

式中,Nrs为单元rs中的周期数,ntot为总节点循环数向量,Ttot为总测试时间,Etot为总能量消耗,D为实际损伤指数(当D=1时达到疲劳破坏),Eaer为空气动力能量耗散,Estr为结构能量耗散,Dt为目标损伤指数In the formula, N rs is the number of cycles in the unit rs, n tot is the total node cycle number vector, T tot is the total test time, E tot is the total energy consumption, D is the actual damage index (when D = 1, the fatigue failure is reached. ), E aer is the aerodynamic energy dissipation, E str is the structural energy dissipation, D t is the target damage index

最小f(q)服从于The minimum f(q) is subject to

3×106-ntot(q)=0 (26)3×10 6 -n tot (q)=0 (26)

Figure BDA0001976182320000132
Figure BDA0001976182320000132

Figure BDA0001976182320000133
Figure BDA0001976182320000133

式中,

Figure BDA0001976182320000134
为时间历程的均方根应变值,x100为末端光纤与弯曲轴之间的距离为100mm。In the formula,
Figure BDA0001976182320000134
is the rms strain value of the time history, and x 100 is the distance between the end fiber and the bending axis of 100 mm.

本发明公开了一种涡轮增压器的多频疲劳试验方法,降低疲劳试验时间,确保较高的保真度,而不使用调谐质量的角度出发,利用两个或多个本征频率组合同时激励叶片,通过调谐激振力振幅来更加逼真的模拟实际的空间损伤分布The invention discloses a multi-frequency fatigue test method of a turbocharger, which reduces the fatigue test time and ensures high fidelity without using the angle of tuning quality, using two or more eigenfrequency combinations simultaneously Exciting the blade to more realistically simulate the actual spatial damage distribution by tuning the excitation force amplitude

本说明书中各个实施例采用递进的方式描述,每个实施例重点说明的都是与其他实施例的不同之处,各个实施例之间相同相似部分互相参见即可,对于实施例公开的装置而言,由于其与实施例公开的方法相对应,所以描述的比较简单,相关之处参见方法部分说明即可。The various embodiments in this specification are described in a progressive manner, and each embodiment focuses on the differences from other embodiments, and the same and similar parts between the various embodiments can be referred to each other. For the devices disclosed in the embodiments In other words, since it corresponds to the method disclosed in the embodiment, the description is relatively simple, and the relevant part can be referred to the description of the method.

对所公开的实施例的上述说明,使本领域专业技术人员能够实现或使用本发明,对这些实施例的多种修改对本领域的专业技术人员来说将是显而易见的,本文中所定义的一般原理可以在不脱离本发明的精神或范围的情况下,在其它实施例中实现,因此,本发明将不会被限制于本文所示的这些实施例,而是要符合与本文所公开的原理和新颖特点相一致的最宽的范围。The foregoing description of the disclosed embodiments enables any person skilled in the art to make or use the invention, and various modifications to these embodiments will be apparent to those skilled in the art. The principles may be implemented in other embodiments without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention, and thus the invention should not be limited to the embodiments shown herein, but is to be consistent with the principles disclosed herein The widest range consistent with novel features.

Claims (1)

1. A multi-frequency fatigue test method of a turbocharger is characterized in that a blade fixing structure, a blade to be tested and an eigenfrequency excitation structure are adopted for testing, one end of the blade to be tested is fixed on the fixing structure, and the eigenfrequency excitation structure is an actuator arranged below the blade to be tested or at least two vibration exciters arranged above the blade to be tested;
the method comprises the following specific steps:
step 1, discretizing the blade, and discretizing the blade by adopting a two-dimensional cluster mass model to obtain a discretized mass model of the blade, wherein
Figure FDA0002424596660000011
For the elements of the basic quality matrix,
Figure FDA0002424596660000012
for the k-th additional tuning quality matrix,
Figure FDA0002424596660000013
for the k-th tuning element or excited mass matrix, where k is the number of times, i and j are the number of rows and columns, i, j, k is 1,2 … …, ei (z) is the bending stiffness of oscillation, c (z) is the chord length, m (z) is the mass of the blade per unit length, the model is generated in a multi-norm numerical calculation environment Matlab v.15a, and consists of n-100 nodes, L is the total length of the blade, and is equidistant at △ z L/n, △ z is the equidistant distance between adjacent nodes, each node has one degree of translational freedom in the x-direction, and the lumped mass system shown in the model has one degree of translational freedom under dual-frequency excitationThe non-linear second order differential equation represented by a dot symbol is described as follows:
Figure FDA0002424596660000014
wherein M is a total mass matrix, D is a Rayleigh damping coefficient, A is a pneumatic damping matrix, K is a stiffness matrix, f1And f2Is the first and second node excitation force amplitude vector, omega1And omega2The angular eigenfrequencies of the first and second modes, x is the displacement vector, t is the time,
Figure FDA0002424596660000015
Figure FDA0002424596660000016
is the absolute value of the component velocity vector, wherein,
Figure FDA0002424596660000017
is the velocity vector of the first component,
Figure FDA0002424596660000018
is the absolute value velocity vector of the first component,
Figure FDA0002424596660000019
is the velocity vector of the nth component,
Figure FDA00024245966600000110
is the absolute value velocity vector of the nth component,
Figure FDA00024245966600000111
meaning a velocity vector of 2,3 … … components,
Figure FDA00024245966600000112
in the form of a velocity vector, the velocity vector,
Figure FDA00024245966600000113
is an acceleration vector;
step 2: solving the stiffness matrix by using the Euler-Bernoulli theorem, and performing semi-analytic processing on each element of an upper triangle of the symmetrical flexibility matrix by using a first-order Euler-Bernoulli beam theory according to an equation (2), wherein z is a wingspan coordinate from the base, and z is a wingspan coordinateiAnd z andjspanwise coordinates for the ith and j nodes, zi﹤zjUsing the principle of imaginary work, equation (2) represents the deformation of the node i caused by the unit load applied by the node j, equation (2) is obtained by numerical integration using the Simpson's rule, and the inverse matrix of the compliance matrix can give the stiffness matrix shown in equation ⑶,
Figure FDA0002424596660000021
K=S-1(3)
in the formula, SijIs a compliance matrix element, S is a compliance matrix,
and step 3:
solving the total mass matrix, basic mass matrix elements, using a correlation function
Figure FDA00024245966600000211
Can be obtained by the following formula:
Figure FDA0002424596660000022
in the formula (I), the compound is shown in the specification,ijfor the Kronecker function, the lumped mass model formula requires that the tuning or excitation mass be distributed discretely over its nodes by distributing the kth tuning mass between its two neighboring nodes i and i +1
Figure FDA0002424596660000023
Equation (5) is used to calculate the corresponding distribution quality matrix
Figure FDA0002424596660000024
Figure FDA0002424596660000025
In the formula, zkFor the coordinates of the kth additional mass,
Figure FDA0002424596660000026
and
Figure FDA0002424596660000027
is an n-dimensional orthogonal basis vector,
Figure FDA0002424596660000028
and
Figure FDA0002424596660000029
is a transposed matrix of the i-dimensional orthogonal basis vectors,
Figure FDA00024245966600000210
for the kth spanwise coordinate, the total mass matrix M can thus be obtained:
Figure FDA0002424596660000031
in the formula (I), the compound is shown in the specification,
Figure FDA0002424596660000032
in order to be a basic quality matrix,
Figure FDA0002424596660000033
for the kth additional tuning or excitation quality matrix, ntIn order to tune the mass number,
and 4, step 4:
the influence of air damping, which is taken into account in the calculation, is expressed in its most common form as rayleigh damping, as shown in detail below,
D=aM+bK (7)
in the above formula, a is 0 and b is 0.0156, a and b are rayleigh damping coefficients,
element A of the aerodynamic damping matrixijCan be obtained by the formula (8) wherein C is perpendicular to the flow of the flat platedAs a conservative approximation representing a complex aerodynamic situation:
Figure FDA0002424596660000034
where ρ is the air density at ambient room temperature, C (z) is the chord length, CdIs an aerodynamic drag coefficient of an angle of attack of 90 degrees,
Figure FDA0002424596660000035
Figure FDA0002424596660000036
by solving the generalized eigenvalue problem set forth in equation (9), the corresponding eigenvectors of the defined model shape are derived from equation (10), where φiN-dimensional eigenmode vectors for the ith mode:
and 5:
considering the influence of the static bending moment, ensuring higher reliability of the solving process, calculating additional parameters, calculating the static bending moment distribution caused by the self weight of the blade by a two-step procedure, and firstly calculating the shearing force Q (z) by using the equation (11) when the boundary condition shearing force Q (L) of the tip is 0:
Figure FDA0002424596660000041
where g is the gravitational acceleration, m(s) is the blade mass per unit length, then the moment distribution Ms (z) is obtained using equation (12), and the boundary condition Ms (L) is 0:
Figure FDA0002424596660000042
where Ms (z) is the bending moment of sway due to self weight, Ms (L) is the bending moment of sway due to self weight at length L, q(s) is the shear force at length s, the static bending moment distribution due to self weight of the external mass can be obtained by equation (13), and the resulting static bending moment can be obtained by equation (14) using the principle of superposition:
Figure FDA0002424596660000043
Figure FDA0002424596660000044
in the formula (I), the compound is shown in the specification,
Figure FDA0002424596660000045
for the k-th tuning mass,
Figure FDA0002424596660000046
spanwise coordinate of the kth additional mass, Mt(z) is the bending moment created by the tuned mass,
Figure FDA0002424596660000047
is static bending moment, niIs the maximum value of k, indicating the kth tuning quality
Figure FDA0002424596660000048
Has a minimum value of 1 and a maximum value of niThe node bending moment history M (z, t) used for damage calculation is represented by equation (15), where the node curvature is approximated by the central difference of the second derivative of the node displacement history x (z, t):
Figure FDA0002424596660000049
step 6:
solving the degree of mixing of the double excitation modes, and limiting the peak strain amplitude to experienceSensor type specific threshold value, root mean square strain threshold value given by equation (16)
Figure FDA0002424596660000051
Used as constraints in the optimization process discussed later:
Figure FDA0002424596660000052
wherein the time span T2-T1The strain history (z, t) of the end fiber corresponding to the steady-state portion of the time history and the flange, which yields bernoulli beams through the strain-moment relationship of first order Euler, as shown in equation (17):
Figure FDA0002424596660000053
in the formula, xc(z) is the distance between the terminal optical fiber and the bending axis;
in the case of dual-frequency excitation, the ratio between the two force amplitudes is measured by the modal mixing degree, defined here as
Figure FDA0002424596660000054
Where ψ is a degree of mixing of the two excitation modes, where ψ ═ 1 denotes F since there are two excitations1Far greater than F2Time-domain excitation, also known as pure mode-1 excitation; psi-0 denotes F2Excitation at 0, also called pure mode-2 excitation, F1And F2In order to obtain the amplitude of the exciting force,
and 7:
in the multi-frequency fatigue test method, a relational expression of design vector variables and related parameters is established, and the nonlinear constraint of final fatigue failure is established from the angle of energy and actual damage distribution;
in the dual-frequency method, the design variable vector q consists of two excitation forces: excitation position and scale factor, given by equation (19):
Figure FDA0002424596660000055
where w is a scale factor, the vector of the total node cycle number and the total test time and total dissipated energy are given by equations (20) to (24), and the objective function of the multi-frequency method conforms to equation (25), the node cycle number in the case of multi-frequency varies with the blade variation, and therefore, the non-linear constraint in equation (28) requires that the minimum node cycle number be equal to or greater than 3X106And (3) cyclic reference:
Figure FDA0002424596660000061
Ttot=w(T2-T1) (21)
Figure FDA0002424596660000062
Figure FDA0002424596660000063
Figure FDA0002424596660000064
Figure FDA0002424596660000065
in the formula, NrsIs the number of cycles in unit rs, ntotAs vector of total node cycle number, TtotFor total test time, EtotFor total energy consumption, D is the actual injury index, EaerFor aerodynamic energy dissipation, EstrFor structural energy dissipation, DtFor the target damage index, f (q) is the algorithm optimization coefficient when the design variable vector is q, Dt(zi) Is a spanwise coordinate of ziTarget injury index, D (z)i) Is a spanwise coordinate of ziReal injury fingerThe number of the first and second groups is,
minimum f (q) obedience
3×106-ntot(q)=0 (26)
Figure FDA0002424596660000066
Figure FDA0002424596660000067
In the formula (I), the compound is shown in the specification,
Figure FDA0002424596660000071
root mean square strain value, x, of time history100(q) is the 100 th displacement vector in the design of the variable vector q, x100The distance between the end fiber and the bending axis was 100 mm.
CN201910133457.2A 2019-02-22 2019-02-22 A multi-frequency fatigue test method for turbochargers Expired - Fee Related CN109946029B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201910133457.2A CN109946029B (en) 2019-02-22 2019-02-22 A multi-frequency fatigue test method for turbochargers

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201910133457.2A CN109946029B (en) 2019-02-22 2019-02-22 A multi-frequency fatigue test method for turbochargers

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN109946029A CN109946029A (en) 2019-06-28
CN109946029B true CN109946029B (en) 2020-07-10

Family

ID=67007663

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201910133457.2A Expired - Fee Related CN109946029B (en) 2019-02-22 2019-02-22 A multi-frequency fatigue test method for turbochargers

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN109946029B (en)

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP3816603B1 (en) * 2019-10-28 2023-03-22 Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy A/S Wind turbine rotor blade load emulator arrangement
CN113029479B (en) * 2021-03-24 2022-11-08 上海电气风电集团股份有限公司 Full-size blade rigidity detection method, electronic device and storage medium
CN114136407B (en) * 2021-11-19 2022-11-22 江苏毅合捷汽车科技股份有限公司 Method for calibrating minimum flow position

Family Cites Families (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB201121590D0 (en) * 2011-12-15 2012-01-25 Lm Wind Power As A wind turbine blade control method
CN103983697B (en) * 2014-05-09 2016-08-24 西安交通大学 A kind of frequency domain quantitative Diagnosis method of Centrufugal compressor impeller crackle under running status
ES2717122T3 (en) * 2014-12-23 2019-06-19 Ore Catapult Development Services Ltd Fatigue tests
CN108593230A (en) * 2018-03-27 2018-09-28 西北工业大学 A kind of Natural Frequency of Blade Auto-Test System
CN109323853B (en) * 2018-09-29 2020-06-30 浙江中烟工业有限责任公司 Fan blade fan vibration detection device and fault detection prediction method

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN109946029A (en) 2019-06-28

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Kang et al. Effects of flexibility on the aerodynamic performance of flapping wings
CN109946029B (en) A multi-frequency fatigue test method for turbochargers
CN109933876B (en) An Unsteady Aerodynamic Order Reduction Method Based on Generalized Aerodynamics
Huang et al. Structural damage identification based on substructure method and improved whale optimization algorithm
Hua et al. Flutter analysis of long-span bridges using ANSYS
Sadeghi et al. Computation of mistuning effects on cascade flutter
CN105205035B (en) A kind of Nonhomogeneous Elastic restrained boundary condition Rectangular Plate Structure in plane vibration analysis method
Gupta et al. Updating a finite element based structural model of a small flexible aircraft
CN111723438A (en) A method for eliminating thermal buckling of lattice sandwich panels and suppressing nonlinear flutter
Prasad et al. A meshless method for subsonic stall flutter analysis of turbomachinery 3D blade cascade
Chen et al. Dynamic modeling of rotating blades system based on transfer matrix method of multibody system
Li et al. Coupled vibration analysis of rotating composite laminated beams in hygrothermal environment using the Green’s function method
Sadeghi et al. Computation of cascade flutter by uncoupled and coupled methods
Zhao et al. Structural and aeroelastic design, analysis, and experiments of inflatable airborne wings
Mikhlin et al. Nonlinear normal modes of vibrating mechanical systems: 10 years of progress
Li et al. A study on the dynamic characteristics of the stiffened coupled plate with the effect of the dynamic vibration absorbers
He et al. Performance investigation of a crossing angle adjustable galloping-based energy harvester
Li et al. Aeroelastic modeling of a three-dimensional wing using the harmonic-balance-based one-shot method
Morad et al. Application of piezoelectric materials for aircraft propeller blades vibration damping
Johnson et al. Prediction of SBLI Induced Flexible Panel Motion using Wall-Modeled LES Coupled to an Aeroelastic Solver
Amini et al. Piezoelectric energy harvesting from vertical piezoelectric beams in the horizontal fluid flows
Righi et al. ROM-based uncertainties quantification of flutter speed prediction of the BSCW wing
Hamdi et al. Beam finite element model of a vibrate wind blade in large elastic deformation
Rao Advances in aero structures
Svoboda et al. Finite element method based modeling of a flexible wing structure

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant
CF01 Termination of patent right due to non-payment of annual fee

Granted publication date: 20200710