CN109918819A - A kind of extensive bridge network estimation method based on Bayesian network - Google Patents

A kind of extensive bridge network estimation method based on Bayesian network Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN109918819A
CN109918819A CN201910196914.2A CN201910196914A CN109918819A CN 109918819 A CN109918819 A CN 109918819A CN 201910196914 A CN201910196914 A CN 201910196914A CN 109918819 A CN109918819 A CN 109918819A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
bridge
network
reliability
probability
failure probability
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
CN201910196914.2A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN109918819B (en
Inventor
李顺龙
王杰
房坤
李惠
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Harbin Institute of Technology
Original Assignee
Harbin Institute of Technology
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Harbin Institute of Technology filed Critical Harbin Institute of Technology
Priority to CN201910196914.2A priority Critical patent/CN109918819B/en
Publication of CN109918819A publication Critical patent/CN109918819A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN109918819B publication Critical patent/CN109918819B/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Landscapes

  • Data Exchanges In Wide-Area Networks (AREA)

Abstract

The invention proposes a kind of extensive bridge network estimation method based on Bayesian network, with ORDER-II and dijkstra's algorithm and vulnerability thought, condition state grade and intercity range information using network Bridge realize extensive bridge network total reliability assessment and key road segment bridge recognition.It converts the NP-hard problem for solving extensive bridge Reliability of Network under claimed accuracy and solves the most probable failure combination of bridge and network-in-dialing state issues.This passes through the assessment to certain national highway bridge network comprising 1772 bridge blocks, it was demonstrated that method proposed by the invention can assess extensive bridge network total reliability with vulnerability index, and can effectively pick out each section bridge relative importance.The present invention can directly efficiently assess large bridge network.

Description

A kind of extensive bridge network estimation method based on Bayesian network
Technical field
The present invention relates to a kind of method of civil engineering bridge network evaluation, and in particular to a kind of based on Bayesian network Extensive bridge network estimation method.
Background technique
For bridge as part the most fragile in basic facility transportation network, safety is to guarantee highway quickly unimpeded fortune Capable key is of great significance to guarantee infrastructure transportation network safe operation or even Regional Economic Development.According to traffic " the 2018 traffic transport industry statistical communique of development " of Department of Transportation's publication, by the end of the year 2018, highway in China bridge 83.25 ten thousand Seat, 5225.62 myriametres are the bridge big countries of the first in the world.
In bridge life cycle management, the construction period only accounts for the full-bridge service life less than 10%, other are curing period.However, bridge Beam moves back during long service due to being influenced aging, service performance and security performance occur by factors such as load and environment The problems such as change.According to statistics, 40% servicing bridges active time has been more than 20 years in Chinese Highway road network, industrial grade three The bridge in spite of illness nearly 30% of class, four classes, unsafe bridge quantity reach 15% (about 100,000).With the bridge number for stepping into the maintenance maintenance phase Measure increasing, the safe condition of bridge structure can not be ignored.
According to Department of Transportation's " about several opinions for further strengthening highway bridge maintenance management " (road hair of handing over to the collective or the state [2013] No. 321) documentation requirements, " determining comprehensive inspection of bridge technology situation, three Nian Yici should be no less than ".Therefore, national Each province and city can all generate the magnanimity detection monitoring information for bridge structure every year.And existing traffic infrastructure is detected, is commented Estimate and carried out as unit of single seat bridge with maintenance strategy formulation, limits between each bridge interconnecting spatially, no Conducive to the unified management of more infrastructure architectures in region, cause when safety warning occur in more bridge blocks, it can not be quickly quasi- Really exclude security risk.It is high for the maintenance and repair expense summation of all bridges in region simultaneously.According to Department of Transportation " national turn pike statistical communique in 2017 " statistics of publication, in 2017 years, national Toll Road income is 5130.2 hundred million yuan, 9156.7 hundred million yuan of gross expenditure, maintenance and operation management pay 1161.5 hundred million yuan, accounting 12.7%.Cause How this, evaluate the relative importance of section bridge in network, be of great significance.
The bridge network Reliability assessment method being widely used at present has: State enumeration method, series and parallel connection method, event tree method Deng.Due to for a network containing m unreliable components (bridge), status number 2m.With bridge network size Expand, preceding method will inevitably fail, and be only applicable to the small-scale bridge network model containing a small amount of bridge.Therefore urgently A kind of quickly and effectively extensive bridge network estimation method based on Reliability of Network need to be developed.
Summary of the invention
In order to solve the problems, such as extensive bridge network evaluation, the present invention provides a kind of based on Reliability of Network the present invention Extensive bridge network estimation method, can rapidly and accurately exclude security risk.
A kind of the technical solution adopted by the present invention to solve the above technical problem are as follows: extensive bridge based on Bayesian network Beam network estimation method, steps are as follows:
Step 1: it is overlapping with hum pattern that bridge network being considered as topological diagram, bridge network physical model is established, wherein opening up Flutter graph model include by network route and the side that is simplified to respectively of route intersection point and node, information graph model include in network The condition state grade of each edge lengths and thereon bridge;
Step 2: calculate monomer bridge failure probability, using in AASHTO standard criterion reliability algorithm and system because Son converts the condition state grade of bridge on network to the reliability and failure probability of bridge entirety, Pf=Φ (- βb), In formula, PfFor the failure probability of bridge, βbFor bridge RELIABILITY INDEX, the design safety grade of bridge RELIABILITY INDEX and structure And technology status grade is related;
Step 3: calculating the failure probability of equivalent bridge, the bridge in network in same edge is considered as serial system, and fixed The adopted serial system is equivalent bridge, while calculating its reliability and failure probability,In formula, PEi Indicate the failure probability of equivalent bridge, Pf(i,j)Indicate the failure probability of upper j-th of the bridge of equivalent bridge i;K is equivalent bridge i packet The entity bridge sum contained;
Step 4: three layers of Bayesian network model of most original are considered using ORDER-II algorithm and dijkstra's algorithm, point Not Ji Suan in precision prescribed lower network all equivalent bridges most probable state combination and various combination lower network connection feelings Condition, and then network total reliability is calculated,In formula, C is the probability of network-in-dialing, EiIt is complete I-th of event of event group E, wherein E contains all failure combinations that component in network is under different conditions, and P (C | Ei) For known event EiThe probability of network-in-dialing, M are the total quantity of network state;
Step 5: in conjunction with the influence failed to network total reliability of failure probability and its of bridge, calculating its vulnerability and refer to Mark, and then assess its relative importance
In formula, VI is the vulnerability index of bridge i,Network is not connected in the case where for known bridge i failure Probability, Pf(Bi) be bridge i failure probability,For the probability that bridge i and network fail simultaneously, and P (C | Bi) it is Know the probability of network-in-dialing in the case that bridge i fails.
Beneficial effects of the present invention: bridge network estimation method of the invention, using bridge network technology status assessment etc. Grade and road section length information calculate Reliability of Network and bridge vulnerability based on Bayesian network, and method is easy to use, calculates essence Degree is high and can be realized the relative importance of identification section bridge, the robustness of the method for the present invention and highly reliable, can be quick Security risk is accurately excluded, provides skill with the assessment of monomer bridge service state and operation maintenance in network for bridge network is whole Art support.
Detailed description of the invention
Fig. 1 ORDER-II-Dijkstra algorithm flow chart;
Fig. 2 includes the national highway network of bridge;
Fig. 3 is the construction time limit and evaluation grade statistical chart of Fig. 2 network Bridge;
Fig. 4 is Fig. 2 network jackshaft beam type and evaluation grade statistical chart;
Fig. 5 is national highway bridge network topological diagram and information figure layer overlay chart;
Fig. 6 is the physical model figure of Fig. 5;
Fig. 7 is entity bridge evaluation grade statistical information figure on each side of Fig. 5;
Fig. 8 is the failure probability figure of 68 equivalent bridges on national highway bridge network;
Fig. 9 is the vulnerability indicatrix of 68 equivalent bridges on national highway bridge network;
Specific embodiment
Below according to Figure of description citing, the present invention will be further described:
Embodiment 1
A kind of extensive bridge network estimation method based on Bayesian network: it establishes containing certain amount side and node Topological network, wherein side and node are respectively the route and route intersection point in network;It will by edge lengths each in network and thereon The Information Level and topological network of the condition state grade composition of bridge are laminated simultaneously.
The failure probability of bridge can be obtained by its RELIABILITY INDEX
Pf=Φ (- βb) (1)
In formula, PfFor the failure probability of bridge, βbFor the RELIABILITY INDEX of bridge.Bridge RELIABILITY INDEX and structure are set It counts security level and technology status grade is related.According to highway engineering structural reliability design unified standard (GB/T 50283- 1999), the design safety grade of highway bridge structure reflects structure and destroys issuable severity of consequence, can be according to Bridges and culverts structure is divided, such as table 1.Simultaneously under the conditions of ductile fracture, the bridge structure component based on AASHTO standard is reliable The one-to-one relationship spent between index and each security level and technology status grade is as shown in table 2.Based on AASHTO standard The value of the system factor of definition is as shown in table 3, can be by each member reliability level promotion to system reliability level.
1 highway engineering structure design safety grade of table
Table Bridge 2 girder construction member reliability index evaluation standard
The value of system factor in table 3AASHTO
If solid bridge beam-like state TiFor Boolean variable, i.e.,
Therefore, for a network with the m bridges that can fail, the number of states of bridge network entirety is 2m.For letter Change computation complexity, do not consider the failure of road, i.e., bridge network Bridge be uniquely can failure member.Defining equivalent bridge is The serial system of bridge composition in network in same edge, calculates its failure probability:
In formula, PEiIndicate the failure probability of equivalent bridge, Pf(i,j)Indicate that the failure of upper j-th of the bridge of equivalent bridge i is general Rate;K is the entity bridge sum that equivalent bridge i includes.Therefore, the failure probability of equivalent bridge and the quantity of bridge thereon and The failure probability of each bridge is related.
Extensive bridge Reliability of Network is calculated using three layers of Bayesian network model of most original.
In formula, BN is bridge network, and NP is the node pair in network, and B is bridge, and R is Reliability of Network.It is former based on reprimand is held Reason, bridge Reliability of Network are defined as
In formula, { f1,f2,…,fqBe network minimal path set, while above formula can be reduced to
It is not connected between arbitrary node pair if the failure for defining any bridge in network will lead to, bridge network is not Otherwise connected state is connected state, and then can acquire its connectivity reliability by network-in-dialing probability.Therefore network can be connected More terminal problems are converted into single terminus problem in general character judgement.Meanwhile the connected probability of network becomes owning in network While bridge is in variant state the probability of network-in-dialing and:
And then it is decomposed into
In formula, C is the probability of network-in-dialing, EiFor i-th of event of self-contained mode E, wherein E is contained in network Component is in all failure combinations under different conditions, and P (C | Ei) it is known event EiThe probability of network-in-dialing, M are network state Total quantity.
Wherein ORDER-II algorithm does not consider network-in-dialing state, finds using most rickle principle complete under claimed accuracy Most probable event in event group E.Wherein apply formula
The failure probability of equivalent bridge is converted into the weight in algorithm, since the conversion weight is with the increasing of failure probability Add monotone decreasing, therefore by equivalent bridge according to w (EqBi)≥w(EqBj) (i > j) sequence arrangement, that is, failure probability passs The sequence arrangement subtracted.Most rickle principle is then applied, every step by adding the equivalent bridge SS in part theretoi-{eL (SSi)}+ {n(eL(SSi)) and SSi+{n(eL(SSi)), and most rickle is updated, the failure for taking the root node of most rickle to obtain for the step Combination, while deleting the new heap formed after the root node of heap and being calculated for next cycle.Until obtaining under expected probability α The most probable preceding a kind failure combination of network.
Dijkstra's algorithm is used to solve the shortest path from a vertex to remaining each vertex.It is by by vertex set The vertex set (V-N) for being divided into the vertex set N for having found out shortest path and being not determined by shortest path, and define wherein one A vertex is source node, and by comparison source node, the last bit node of the length on each vertex and source node into N is again in (V-N) The path length on any vertex in (V-N) updates the shortest path in (V-N), and successively that the path in (V-N) is minimum It is worth corresponding node to be added in N, until (V-N) is empty set.Dijkstra algorithm passes through on the basis of dijkstra's algorithm Change weight matrix, and then change the source node of algorithm, finds shortest path in network between all terminus pair and most short Distance, to judge the connected state of network.When searching node i to the shortest distance between other all nodes, general first The transformation of unit matrix A row or rank transformation are converted into matrix A ':
In formula,Row transformation between the i-th row and the 1st row,Between i column and the 1st column Rank transformation.Weight matrix can be converted using following formula later
W'=A'WA'(11)
In formula, W is the weight matrix of network, the actual range being taken as between node.Therefore, it is first obtained by ORDER-II The most probable state of network, and then application dijkstra's algorithm calculates the connection situation of each state lower network entirety, using formula (8) connected probability of network can be acquired.
As shown in figure 1, PEiFor the failure probability of equivalent bridge i;M is the quantity of equivalent bridge in network;N is nodes Quantity;V is the set of all nodes in network;A is network most probable failure combination;S is all equivalent bridges in network according to w (EqBi)≥w(EqBj) (i > j) sequence set;S (i) is i-th of amount in S;α is algorithm accuracy;For equivalent bridge weight;w(SSi) it is SSiIn equivalent bridge weight and;SSiFor the subset of S, Meet w (SSi)≥w(SSj) (i > j), the equivalent bridge set of table non ageing;P(SSi) it is SSiIn equivalent bridge be failure, His equivalent bridge is the probability being on active service;eL(SSi) it is SSiLast position;n(EqBi) be S in equivalent bridge i next bit; SSi-{eiIt is SSiDelete eiSet;SSi+{eiIt is SSiAdd eiSet;N is shortest path node collection;D (j) is from i Point arrives the shortest distance of source point;U is node nearest from source point in V-N;Dis (j) is node j and eL(N) node direct range.
The failure probability that the vulnerability index of bridge network combines network Bridge fails with it to Reliability of Network It influences, to judge the relative importance of bridge, identifies the key road segment bridge in network.Therefore, on route after bridge failure Without other alternative routes, vulnerability index is
In formula, VI is the vulnerability index of bridge i,Network is disconnected in the case where for known bridge i failure Probability, Pf(Bi) be bridge i failure probability,For the probability that bridge i and network fail simultaneously, and P (C | Bi) it is known The probability of network-in-dialing in the case that bridge i fails.Therefore, the lesser bridge of vulnerability index is to the safe and reliable of network entirety It is even more important.
Step 1: the building of bridge network physical model.As shown in figure 5, bridge network is considered as topological diagram and hum pattern Overlapping, wherein topological graph model includes the side being simplified to respectively by the route in network with route intersection point and node, information artwork Type includes each edge lengths and the condition state grade of bridge thereon in network;
Step 2: calculating monomer bridge failure probability.Using in AASHTO standard criterion reliability algorithm and system because Son converts bridge entirety for the condition state grade of bridge on network in conjunction with the design safety class information of bridge Reliability and apply Pf=Φ (- βb) formula calculates its failure probability;
Step 3: calculating the failure probability of equivalent bridge.Bridge in network in same edge is considered as serial system, and fixed The adopted serial system is equivalent bridge, while calculating its reliability and failure probability
Step 4: calculating network total reliability index.Most original is considered using ORDER-II and Dijkstra algorithm Three layers of Bayesian network model, calculate separately all equivalent bridges in precision prescribed lower network most probable state combination and not With the connection situation of combination lower network, and then apply formulaCalculate network total reliability;
Step 5: assessing each section bridge relative importance.It fails with it and integrally may be used to network in conjunction with the failure probability of bridge By the influence of degree, its vulnerability index is calculatedAnd then assess its relative importance.
Embodiment 2
Specific embodiments of the present invention, by combining the analysis and assessment of certain national highway bridge network to be illustrated.
As shown in Fig. 2, national highway bridge network total kilometrage is 7089km, 1 capital radioactive ray, 8 north and south longitudinal direction are covered Line, 5 thing x wires and 3 connecting lines include 11 cities and 1772 bridge blocks.As shown in figure 3,1772 bridge blocks In more than 60% Years Of Service be less than 20 years;As shown in figure 4, be more than simultaneously 80% Bridge Evaluation grade be 1 class and 2 classes, place In preferable service state.
Step 1: building bridge network physical model, as shown in Figure 6.Bridge network is considered as to the weight of topological diagram and hum pattern It is folded, as shown in fig. 6, wherein topological graph model include by the route and the side that is simplified to respectively of route intersection point and node in network, Information Level includes each edge lengths and the condition state grade of bridge thereon in network, as shown in Figure 7;
Step 2: using AASHTO standardize in reliability algorithm and system factor, in conjunction with the design safety grade of bridge Information converts the reliability of bridge entirety for the condition state grade of 1772 bridge blocks on network and using Pf=Φ (- βb) formula calculates its failure probability;
Step 3: finding 68 equivalent bridges in network, in conjunction with the failure probability of its bridge of being taken in, it is reliable to calculate it Degree and failure probabilityAs shown in Figure 8;
Step 4: considering three layers of Bayesian network model of most original using ORDER-II and dijkstra's algorithm, count respectively The most probable state combination and the connection situation of various combination lower network of 68 equivalent bridges in 99.9% precision lower network are calculated, And then apply formulaCalculating network total reliability is 0.99439;
Step 5: in conjunction with the influence failed to network total reliability of failure probability and its of equivalent bridge, calculating and exist Its vulnerability index under 99.9% precisionAs shown in figure 9, and then assessing its relative importance.
This appraisal procedure can accurately identify that Tumen in network-Hunchun section bridge is most important, to network whole with people Common sense, which differentiates, unanimously demonstrates the accuracy of the proposed method of the present invention.

Claims (1)

1. a kind of extensive bridge network estimation method based on Bayesian network, which is characterized in that method and step is as follows:
Step 1: it is overlapping with hum pattern that bridge network being considered as topological diagram, establishes bridge network physical model, wherein topological diagram It includes each side in network that model, which includes by side and node, information graph model that the route in network is simplified to respectively with route intersection point, The condition state grade of length and thereon bridge;
Step 2: monomer bridge failure probability is calculated, using the reliability algorithm and system factor in AASHTO standard criterion, Convert the condition state grade of bridge on network to the reliability and failure probability of bridge entirety, Pf=Φ (- βb), formula In, PfFor the failure probability of bridge, βbFor bridge RELIABILITY INDEX, the design safety grade of bridge RELIABILITY INDEX and structure with And technology status grade is related;
Step 3: calculating the failure probability of equivalent bridge, the bridge in network in same edge is considered as serial system, and defining should Serial system is equivalent bridge, while calculating its reliability and failure probability,In formula, PEiIt indicates The failure probability of equivalent bridge, Pf(i,j)Indicate the failure probability of upper j-th of the bridge of equivalent bridge i;The equivalent bridge i of k includes Entity bridge sum;
Step 4: considering three layers of Bayesian network model of most original using ORDER-II algorithm and dijkstra's algorithm, count respectively The most probable state combination and the connection situation of various combination lower network for calculating all equivalent bridges in precision prescribed lower network, into And network total reliability is calculated,In formula, C is the probability of network-in-dialing, EiFor self-contained mode I-th of event of E, wherein E contains all failure combinations that component in network is under different conditions, and P (C | Ei) it is known Event EiThe probability of network-in-dialing, M are the total quantity of network state;
Step 5: in conjunction with the influence failed to network total reliability of failure probability and its of bridge, its vulnerability index is calculated, And then assess its relative importance
In formula, VI is the vulnerability index of bridge i,Network is disconnected general in the case where for known bridge i failure Rate, Pf(Bi) be bridge i failure probability,For the probability that bridge i and network fail simultaneously, and P (C | Bi) it is known bridge The probability of network-in-dialing in the case that i fails.
CN201910196914.2A 2019-03-15 2019-03-15 Bayesian network-based large-scale bridge network evaluation method Active CN109918819B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201910196914.2A CN109918819B (en) 2019-03-15 2019-03-15 Bayesian network-based large-scale bridge network evaluation method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201910196914.2A CN109918819B (en) 2019-03-15 2019-03-15 Bayesian network-based large-scale bridge network evaluation method

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN109918819A true CN109918819A (en) 2019-06-21
CN109918819B CN109918819B (en) 2021-01-12

Family

ID=66965043

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201910196914.2A Active CN109918819B (en) 2019-03-15 2019-03-15 Bayesian network-based large-scale bridge network evaluation method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN109918819B (en)

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN111950180A (en) * 2020-08-13 2020-11-17 长沙理工大学 Reliability analysis method and system for cable bearing bridge structure system
CN112187577A (en) * 2020-09-27 2021-01-05 哈尔滨工业大学 Large-scale bridge network connectivity probability assessment method based on network decomposition
CN113094843A (en) * 2021-04-30 2021-07-09 哈尔滨工业大学 Solving method for conditional probability of beam bridge evaluation based on Bayesian network
CN113743831A (en) * 2021-11-03 2021-12-03 深圳市城市交通规划设计研究中心股份有限公司 Bridge network comprehensive performance evaluation method and device and storage medium
CN116561875A (en) * 2023-07-07 2023-08-08 合肥工业大学 Bridge network vulnerability analysis method considering bridge seismic response correlation

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN103942950A (en) * 2014-04-26 2014-07-23 张兴 Method for predicating degree of reliability of traffic circulation of arterial highway under snow and ice environments

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN103942950A (en) * 2014-04-26 2014-07-23 张兴 Method for predicating degree of reliability of traffic circulation of arterial highway under snow and ice environments

Non-Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
ALEX KOSGODAGAN等: "A Two‐Dimension Dynamic Bayesian Network for Large‐Scale Degradation Modeling with an Application to a Bridges Network", 《COMPUTER-AIDED CIVIL AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING》 *
YANCHAO YUE: "Impact of seismic vulnerability on bridge management system", 《HTTPS://EPRINTS-PHD.BIBLIO.UNITN.IT/792/》 *
徐颢: "基于响应面模型的城市单体桥梁与桥网地震易损性评估", 《中国优秀硕士学位论文全文数据库工程科技Ⅱ辑》 *
王佳伟: "地震影响下的公路桥梁网络易损性分析及算法改进", 《中国优秀硕士学位论文全文数据库工程科技Ⅱ辑》 *

Cited By (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN111950180A (en) * 2020-08-13 2020-11-17 长沙理工大学 Reliability analysis method and system for cable bearing bridge structure system
CN111950180B (en) * 2020-08-13 2022-06-07 长沙理工大学 Reliability analysis method and system for cable bearing bridge structure system
CN112187577A (en) * 2020-09-27 2021-01-05 哈尔滨工业大学 Large-scale bridge network connectivity probability assessment method based on network decomposition
CN112187577B (en) * 2020-09-27 2021-11-23 哈尔滨工业大学 Large-scale bridge network connectivity probability assessment method based on network decomposition
CN113094843A (en) * 2021-04-30 2021-07-09 哈尔滨工业大学 Solving method for conditional probability of beam bridge evaluation based on Bayesian network
CN113743831A (en) * 2021-11-03 2021-12-03 深圳市城市交通规划设计研究中心股份有限公司 Bridge network comprehensive performance evaluation method and device and storage medium
CN116561875A (en) * 2023-07-07 2023-08-08 合肥工业大学 Bridge network vulnerability analysis method considering bridge seismic response correlation
CN116561875B (en) * 2023-07-07 2023-09-15 合肥工业大学 Bridge network vulnerability analysis method considering bridge seismic response correlation

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN109918819B (en) 2021-01-12

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN109918819A (en) A kind of extensive bridge network estimation method based on Bayesian network
CN112365100B (en) Disaster risk comprehensive assessment-based power grid disaster early warning and response method
Rashidi et al. A new model for bridge management: Part A: condition assessment and priority ranking of bridges
CN105279572A (en) City track traffic passenger flow density index calculating and releasing system
Akgul Lifetime system* reliability prediction for multiple structure types in a bridge network
US8326791B2 (en) Prioritizing bridges to repair based on risk
CN114626119A (en) Maintenance intelligent decision method and system based on bridge big data
CN116611586B (en) Newly built road network flow prediction method and system based on double-layer heterogeneous network
CN109101734A (en) A kind of prediction technique of Continuous Rigid-Frame Bridge downwarp risk
Fu et al. Probabilistic seismic resilience-based cost–benefit analysis for bridge retrofit assessment
CN109359742A (en) A kind of generation method in subway subsystem preventive maintenance period
CN108537914A (en) Public bicycles method for diagnosing faults
CN116341957A (en) Digital rate measuring method for highway infrastructure
Tabatabai et al. Reliability of bridge decks in the United States
CN110807916A (en) Road network topological structure-based traffic state evaluation method and system
KR20230136011A (en) Ai based predicting method of bridge management method and costs according to damage types
CN105303246A (en) Multiline arrival time prediction for public transportation
CN105243848A (en) Real-time road condition prediction method and system
Zhan et al. Data accuracy oriented method for deploying fixed and mobile traffic sensors along a freeway
CN106570245B (en) Petri network-based airport terminal reliability identification method
CN113051728A (en) Traffic network anti-seismic robustness assessment method
Lesley Generalised costs and the value of time as a method of patronage forecasting
Yamany et al. Prediction of pavement performance using non-homogeneous Markov models: Incorporating the impact of preventive maintenance
Guzda et al. Probabilistic characterization of live load using visual counts and in-service strain monitoring
CN117935563B (en) Risk point identification method based on traffic transportation network

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant