CN109903822A - Testing result appraisal procedure and device, computer readable storage medium - Google Patents
Testing result appraisal procedure and device, computer readable storage medium Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN109903822A CN109903822A CN201910069340.2A CN201910069340A CN109903822A CN 109903822 A CN109903822 A CN 109903822A CN 201910069340 A CN201910069340 A CN 201910069340A CN 109903822 A CN109903822 A CN 109903822A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- grade
- testing result
- current
- ability rating
- capability index
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 113
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 96
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 60
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 claims description 35
- 238000004590 computer program Methods 0.000 claims description 20
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 abstract description 8
- 230000009897 systematic effect Effects 0.000 description 33
- 239000003153 chemical reaction reagent Substances 0.000 description 17
- 238000007689 inspection Methods 0.000 description 12
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 10
- 238000003908 quality control method Methods 0.000 description 10
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 9
- 230000006872 improvement Effects 0.000 description 9
- 230000002159 abnormal effect Effects 0.000 description 6
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 5
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000011521 glass Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000011835 investigation Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000003795 chemical substances by application Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000003759 clinical diagnosis Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000006399 behavior Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000008280 blood Substances 0.000 description 1
- 210000004369 blood Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 210000001175 cerebrospinal fluid Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 238000012512 characterization method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012790 confirmation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000003745 diagnosis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 235000013399 edible fruits Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 238000009434 installation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012423 maintenance Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000002360 preparation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005070 sampling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000011895 specific detection Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009885 systemic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000002700 urine Anatomy 0.000 description 1
Landscapes
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
Testing result appraisal procedure disclosed by the embodiments of the present invention obtains the current Capability index of detection system, determines that current ability rating, the Capability index include unilateral Capability index according to Capability index, the ability rating includes unilateral ability rating；According to current ability grade, the believable grade of current detection result is determined.Testing result appraisal procedure disclosed by the invention, obtain current Capability index, determine the Reliability of current detection result, the case where allowing experiment operator to know testing result in time, it avoids issuing untrustworthy testing result, it solves and lacks a kind of method being analyzed and processed for the problem that testing result data at present, the confidence level of testing result cannot be assessed.The Capability index of use is unilateral Capability index, and the correctness of testing result can be determined by comparing current unilateral Capability index, the believable grade of testing result is judged by correctness, has ensured the assessment accuracy of the appraisal procedure.
Description
Technical field
The present invention relates to intelligent medical field more particularly to a kind of testing result appraisal procedure and devices, computer-readable
Storage medium.
Background technique
For clinical diagnosis, every biochemical investigation has great reference significance, biochemical investigation for medical practitioner
It is the common measuring means of hospital laboratory, inspection specimen is usually passed through for sample with the blood of people, urine, cerebrospinal fluid etc.
In various biochemical compositions content, provide foundation for clinical diagnosis.And the detection device for being used for biochemical investigation is by biochemistry
Sampling, reagent adding in analytic process, the instrument for going chaff interferent, mixing, automatic detection etc. and carrying out automatic operation, examine equipment
It needs constantly to detect during use, assessment, guarantees its normal work, Medical Devices could be allowed preferably to play excellent
Gesture, therefore the daily assessment of Medical Devices is essential.So whether the testing result that detection device obtains is believable,
Then it is particularly important.
Mode traditional at present is using using quality-control product as medium, the Internal Quality Control method of Westgad system, and the method is because steady
Fixed quality-control product constructs Quality Control figure, the acceptability of clinical effectiveness is judged by the data distribution of Quality Control figure.Clinical examination at present
In, merely based on the series of rules such as Westgard 1-3S, 2-2S, 4-1S, R-4S advocated, determine quality-control product testing number
According to whether controlling, then determine that the confidence level of clinical report, but this method have ignored phase of the check analysis with clinical demand
Guan Xing, although exceeding certain rules, is unlikely to clinic diagnosis to generate the change of matter if inspection result is accurate enough
Change, in this case, the Capability index of association clinical demand be added, while divided rank, and with existing data trend
Analysis generates different groups and is merged into capable judgement, promotion Laboratory efficiencies, the attenuating for correcting cost, the calibration of error are searched,
The saving of patient resource has greatest benefit.
Summary of the invention
The embodiment of the present invention provides a kind of testing result appraisal procedure and device, computer readable storage medium, can be effective
Solve it is existing lack a kind of method being analyzed and processed for testing result data, cannot confidence level to testing result into
The problem of row assessment.
One embodiment of the invention provides a kind of testing result appraisal procedure, comprising steps of
The current Capability index of detection system is obtained, current ability rating is determined according to Capability index, the ability refers to
Number includes unilateral Capability index, and the ability rating includes unilateral ability rating；
According to current ability grade, the believable grade of current detection result is determined.
Compared with prior art, testing result appraisal procedure disclosed by the embodiments of the present invention, obtains current Capability index,
The Reliability for determining current detection result, the case where allowing experiment operator to know testing result in time, avoid by
Untrustworthy testing result issues, and solves and lacks a kind of method being analyzed and processed for testing result data at present,
The problem of confidence level of testing result cannot being assessed.The Capability index that the present invention uses is unilateral Capability index, is passed through
The correctness of testing result can be determined by comparing current unilateral Capability index, judge the believable etc. of testing result by correctness
Grade, has ensured the assessment accuracy of the appraisal procedure.
As an improvement of the above scheme, the ability rating includes the first estate, the second grade, the tertiary gradient and the 4th
Grade；
When the Capability index is in preset first range, the second range, third range or the 4th range, the energy
Power grade corresponds to the first estate, the second grade, the tertiary gradient or the fourth estate.
As an improvement of the above scheme, the believable grade of the current detection result includes, confidence level, the grade that leaves a question open and not
Believable grade；
Current unilateral side ability rating is the tertiary gradient or the fourth estate, then the believable grade of current detection result is to trust
Grade；
Current unilateral side ability rating is the second grade, then the believable grade of current detection result is the grade that leaves a question open；
Current unilateral side ability rating is the first estate, then the believable grade of current detection result is untrustworthy grade.
As an improvement of the above scheme, the Capability index further includes Measure of Process Capability, and the ability rating further includes
Process capability grade, the confidence level divide the first confidence level and the second confidence level, the grade that leaves a question open according to unilateral ability rating
It is that first grade and second that leaves a question open leaves a question open grade according to process capability grade classification；The untrustworthy grade is drawn according to process capability grade
It is divided into the first untrustworthy grade and the second untrustworthy grade.
As an improvement of the above scheme, first confidence level and the second confidence level；
Current unilateral side ability rating is the fourth estate, then the confidence level is the first confidence level；
Current unilateral side ability rating is the tertiary gradient, then the confidence level is the second confidence level.
As an improvement of the above scheme, described first leave a question open grade, second leave a question open grade, the first untrustworthy grade and second can not
Confidence level；
Active procedure ability is not the second grade, then the grade that leaves a question open is first to leave a question open grade；
Active procedure ability rating is the second grade, then the grade that leaves a question open is second to leave a question open grade.
Active procedure ability rating is not the first estate or the second grade, then the untrustworthy grade is first untrustworthy
Grade；
Active procedure ability rating is the first estate or the second grade, then the untrustworthy grade is second untrustworthy
Grade.
As an improvement of the above scheme, testing result appraisal procedure further include:
It obtains detection system current data form and current data trend feature is determined, according to number according to current data form
Operation prompting message is determined according to trend feature and believable grade.
Another embodiment of the present invention is corresponding to provide a kind of testing result assessment device, comprising:
Current data acquiring unit obtains the current Capability index of detection system, current energy is determined according to Capability index
Power grade, the Capability index include unilateral Capability index, and the ability rating includes unilateral ability rating；
Believable level de-termination unit determines the believable grade of current detection result according to current ability grade.
Another embodiment of the present invention provides a kind of testing results to assess device, including processor, memory and storage
In the memory and it is configured as the computer program executed by the processor, the processor executes the computer
Testing result appraisal procedure described in any of the above-described inventive embodiments is realized when program.
Another embodiment of the present invention provides a kind of computer readable storage medium, the computer readable storage medium packet
Include the computer program of storage, wherein where controlling the computer readable storage medium in computer program operation
Equipment executes testing result appraisal procedure described in any of the above-described inventive embodiments.
Detailed description of the invention
Fig. 1 is a kind of flow diagram for testing result appraisal procedure that one embodiment of the invention provides.
Fig. 2 is a kind of flow diagram for testing result appraisal procedure that one embodiment of the invention provides.
Fig. 3 is a kind of structural schematic diagram for testing result assessment device that one embodiment of the invention provides.
Fig. 4 is a kind of structural schematic diagram for testing result assessment device that one embodiment of the invention provides.
Fig. 5 is a kind of structural schematic diagram for testing result assessment device that one embodiment of the invention provides.
Specific embodiment
Following will be combined with the drawings in the embodiments of the present invention, and technical solution in the embodiment of the present invention carries out clear, complete
Site preparation description, it is clear that described embodiments are only a part of the embodiments of the present invention, instead of all the embodiments.It is based on
Embodiment in the present invention, it is obtained by those of ordinary skill in the art without making creative efforts every other
Embodiment shall fall within the protection scope of the present invention.
It is a kind of flow diagram for testing result appraisal procedure that one embodiment of the invention provides referring to Fig. 1, comprising:
S1, the current Capability index of detection system is obtained, current ability rating, the ability is determined according to Capability index
Index includes unilateral Capability index, and the ability rating includes unilateral ability rating；
It is appreciated that the current Capability index combination current detection result is calculated, can characterize
The data cases of current detection result.Its specific detection method can refer to hereinafter, in response to corresponding to preset inspection project
Detection system unilateral capability evaluation instruction, obtain the preset limits of error, preset frame mean value, the detection system
The average and standard deviation united to n inspection result of sample；Wherein, the n inspection result is the n nearest with current time
A inspection result, n >=2；According to the limits of error, frame mean value, average and standard deviation, the detection system is calculated
Unilateral Capability index.
S2, according to current ability grade, determine the believable grade of current detection result.
It is found that testing result appraisal procedure disclosed by the embodiments of the present invention, obtains current Capability index, current inspection is determined
The Reliability of result is surveyed, the case where allowing experiment operator to know testing result in time, avoiding will be untrustworthy
Testing result issues, and solves and lacks a kind of method being analyzed and processed for testing result data at present, cannot be to detection
As a result the problem of confidence level is assessed.The Capability index that the present invention uses is unilateral Capability index, by comparing current single
Side Capability index can determine the correctness of testing result, and the believable grade of testing result is judged by correctness, ensure
The assessment accuracy of the appraisal procedure.
Further, the ability rating includes the first estate, the second grade, the tertiary gradient and the fourth estate；
When the Capability index is in preset first range, the second range, third range or the 4th range, the energy
Power grade corresponds to the first estate, the second grade, the tertiary gradient or the fourth estate.
In a preferred embodiment of the invention, when the unilateral Capability index is in preset first range, by institute
Stating unilateral ability rating is the first estate；When the unilateral Capability index is in preset second range, by the unilateral energy
Power grade is the second grade；When the unilateral Capability index is within the scope of preset third, it is by the unilateral ability rating
The tertiary gradient；It is the fourth estate by the unilateral ability rating when the unilateral Capability index is in preset 4th range.
Wherein, first range is the section less than 1；Second range is the section more than or equal to 1 and less than 1.33；It is described
Third range is the section more than or equal to 1.33 and less than 2；4th range is the section greater than 2 or equal to 2.When described
When unilateral Capability index corresponds to the first estate, then illustrates that the detection system belongs to and deviate wait improve；When the unilateral Capability index
When corresponding second grade, then illustrate that detection system offset is general；When the unilateral Capability index corresponds to the tertiary gradient, then say
Bright detection system offset is good；When the unilateral Capability index corresponds to the fourth estate, then illustrate that detection system offset is excellent
It is elegant.In the present embodiment, Capability index is divided, is carried out by the first estate, the second grade, the tertiary gradient and the fourth estate
Characterization, described the first estate, the second grade, the tertiary gradient and the fourth estate can be indicated with 1,2,3 and 4 respectively, be further simplified
The expression of Capability index, in relatively current ability grade, comparison result readability is higher, understands convenient for experiment operator
The concrete condition of testing result.
Further, the believable grade of the current detection result includes confidence level, the grade that leaves a question open and untrustworthy grade；
Current unilateral side ability rating is the tertiary gradient or the fourth estate, then the believable grade of current detection result is to trust
Grade；
Current unilateral side ability rating is the second grade, then the believable grade of current detection result is the grade that leaves a question open；
Current unilateral side ability rating is the first estate, then the believable grade of current detection result is untrustworthy grade.
In a preferred embodiment of the invention, unilateral ability rating is compared, to determine the correct of testing result
Degree, tentatively obtains the judgement to the believable grade of testing result.It can table if the current offset of detection system is outstanding or good
Show that the testing result correctness is higher, belongs to confidence level, and if detection system current offset can generally indicate the testing result
Correctness is general, and there may be problems for testing result, and Reliability is not high, belongs to the grade that leaves a question open, and if detection system is currently inclined
It moves wait improve, can indicate that the testing result correctness is poor, there are mistakes for testing result, and it is unusable, belong to untrustworthy grade.
By comparing currently to unilateral ability rating, determine the Reliability of current detection result so that experiment operator can and
The case where Shi Zhidao testing result, avoids issuing untrustworthy testing result, solves and lacks one kind at present for detection
The method that result data is analyzed and processed, the problem of cannot assessing the Reliability of testing result.Also, the present invention
In, also this result is characterized by believable grade figure, the believable grade figure can be in user's display interface
A certain specific image indicates Reliability by eye image in the present embodiment, and select eye color is that green expression is believable
Grade is confidence level；Eye color is selected to indicate that believable grade is the grade that leaves a question open for yellow；Eye color is selected to indicate for red
Believable grade is untrustworthy grade, so that information needed for the more intuitive acquisition of user's energy, can quickly obtain determining testing result
Confidence level, to take appropriate measures.
Further, the Capability index further includes Measure of Process Capability, and the ability rating further includes process capability etc.
Grade, the confidence level divide the first confidence level and the second confidence level according to unilateral ability rating, and the grade that leaves a question open is according to process energy
Power grade classification is that first grade and second that leaves a question open leaves a question open grade；The untrustworthy grade is not first not according to process capability grade classification
Believable grade and the second untrustworthy grade.
In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the acquisition methods of the Measure of Process Capability can refer to hereinafter, in response to
To the instruction of the process capability evaluation of the corresponding detection system of preset inspection project, obtain systemic presupposition the limits of error and
Standard deviation of the detection system to n inspection result of sample；Wherein, the n inspection result is nearest with current time
N inspection result, n >=2；According to the limits of error and standard deviation, the process capability for calculating the detection system refers to
Number.It is the first estate by the process capability grade when the Measure of Process Capability is in preset first range；When described
It is the second grade by the process capability grade when Measure of Process Capability is in preset second range；When the process capability
It is the tertiary gradient by the process capability grade when index is within the scope of preset third；When the Measure of Process Capability is pre-
If the 4th range in when, by the process capability grade be the fourth estate.Wherein, first range is the section less than 1；
Second range is the section more than or equal to 1 and less than 1.33；The third range is more than or equal to 1.33 and less than 2
Section；4th range is the section (or section greater than 2) greater than 2 or equal to 2.When the Measure of Process Capability is corresponding
When the first estate, then illustrate that the detection system belongs to stable state and waits improving；When corresponding second grade of the Measure of Process Capability, then
Illustrate that the detection system stable state is general；When the Measure of Process Capability corresponds to the tertiary gradient, then illustrate the detection system stable state
Well；When the Measure of Process Capability corresponds to the fourth estate, then illustrate that the detection system stable state is outstanding.Into one in the present embodiment
Step increases the Measure of Process Capability that can characterize detection system stable state, can determine inspection by comparing active procedure ability rating
The precision for surveying result ensures assessment knot further based on the precision of testing result to believable grade further division
It is also that experiment operator further appreciates that experimental data gives analysis foundation, and is based on this kind thin while fruit accuracy
The level of trust divided can also provide analysis foundation to operation prompting message.
Further, first confidence level and the second confidence level；Current unilateral side ability rating is the fourth estate, then described
Confidence level is the first confidence level；Current unilateral side ability rating is the tertiary gradient, then the confidence level is the second confidence level.
In a preferred embodiment of the invention, by unilateral ability rating to believable grading row further division, because
For when current unilateral ability rating is the tertiary gradient or the fourth estate, the accuracy of testing result is higher, without reference to process
Ability rating can do further assessment to testing result according to unilateral ability rating and divide, and current unilateral side ability rating is the
Four grades indicate that system deviation is outstanding, and testing result correctness highest, believable rank is high, belongs to the first confidence level, current single
Side ability rating is the tertiary gradient, indicates that system deviation is good, and testing result correctness is high, and believable rank is high, belongs to second
Confidence level.
Further, described first leave a question open grade, second leave a question open grade, the first untrustworthy grade and the second untrustworthy grade；
Active procedure ability rating is not the second grade, then the grade that leaves a question open is first to leave a question open grade；
Active procedure ability rating is the second grade, then the grade that leaves a question open is second to leave a question open grade.
Active procedure ability rating is not the first estate or the second grade, then the untrustworthy grade is first untrustworthy
Grade；
Active procedure ability rating is the first estate or the second grade, then the untrustworthy grade is second untrustworthy
Grade.
In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the believable grade of further division is helped by process capability, is being left a question open
In grade, if preceding process capability grade is the second grade, then it represents that systematic steady state is poor, belongs to second and leaves a question open grade.Insincere
Rely in grade, if active procedure ability rating is the first estate or the second grade, then it represents that systematic steady state is poor, belongs to second not
Believable grade.
Further, the testing result appraisal procedure further include:
It obtains detection system current data form and current data trend feature is determined, according to number according to current data form
Operation prompting message is determined according to trend feature and believable grade.
As shown in Fig. 2, determining behaviour according to data trend feature and believable grade in a preferred embodiment of the invention
Make prompting message, operation can be provided to experiment operator and reminded, guiding experiment operator is rationally improved.Also,
Operation prompting message can be shown by operation prompting figure in the present invention, specifically can be one on user's display interface
The image of a magnifying glass, when magnifying glass content is checked in user's selection, then display operation prompting message, the selection are checked not
It is required that being that user clicks selection, selection operation nearby also may be regarded as when mouse is placed on magnifying glass image by user.Meanwhile it is described
Operation prompting message can be related and remind number, after correlation number is checked in selection, then show specific operation prompting message.
Its concrete scheme may be designed as, and data trend feature is divided into five classes, is specifically included: A class, last 5 batches, same dense
Degree is more than twice of standard deviation (2SD) there are any two point；B class, last 5 batches, there are any two point differences to surpass for same concentration
Four times of standard deviations (4SD) out；C class, three points are more than one times of standard deviation (3-1S), and four points are more than one times of standard deviation (4-1S),
More than octuple mean value (8X), more than nine times mean values (9X), more than ten times mean values (10X) are more than twelvefold mean value (12X), wherein
One or more point meets aforementioned rule；D class, any one point exceed three times standard deviation (3SD)；E class, the concentration are criticized with same
The Z value of secondary another concentration differs by more than four times of standard deviations (4SD)；F class, with criticizing, another testing result is equidirectional to exceed twice of mark
Quasi- poor (2SD).
When data trend feature is A class in the present embodiment:
Testing result is the first confidence level, and the operation prompting message is that number 1, there are small systematic errors, but because being
The opposite allowable error of system variation is sufficiently small, if without departing from the systematic error of permission, on patient's result without influence, it is not recommended that intervenes.
Testing result is the second confidence level, and the operation prompting message is that number 2, there are certain systematic error, Quality Controls
Rule is more than 2SD there are any two point, can check exponentially weighted moving average (EWMA) (EWMA) with the presence or absence of ascendant trend and it is out of control,
Hotelling statistic (HotellingT2) whether coefficient is greater than 1, if both prompting problem, lock out of control；It, can if no problem
It can be that false anomaly or vacation are out of control, reason may cause for shared calibration deviation, can judge according to autocorrelogram.Finally, passing through meter
Calculate whether the error exceeds the influence for allowing systematic error to confirm to patient's result.
Testing result is first to leave a question open grade, and the operation prompting message is number 3, and precision satisfaction, there are certain to be
It unites error, Quality control rules can check exponentially weighted moving average (EWMA) (EWMA) with the presence or absence of ascendant trend and out of control, suddenly there are 2-2s
Special woods statistic (HotellingT2) whether coefficient is greater than 1, if both prompting problem, lock out of control；It, may if no problem
Out of control for false anomaly or vacation, reason may cause for shared calibration deviation, can judge according to autocorrelogram.Finally, passing through calculating
Whether the error exceeds the influence for allowing systematic error to confirm to patient's result.Corrective maintenance and (or) calibration may be necessary.Examination
Agent difference between batch it is also contemplated that, it is proposed that use stable state interval functionality.
Testing result is second to leave a question open grade, and the operation prompting message is number 4, although there are certain systematic error,
But precision more needs to pay attention to, and verifies all factors for leading to precision corruption.Simple calibration can not solve the problems, such as, seek help when necessary
Producer.This precision is also possible to cause for reagent difference between batch, it is proposed that uses stable state interval functionality.According to imprecision, index
Weighted moving average (EWMA) figure and Hotelling statistic (HotellingT2) coefficient judges the systematic error source.
Testing result is the first untrustworthy grade, and the operation prompting message is number 5, there are significant systematic error,
Simple calibration cannot change problem.Current state is not available effective quality tool and is monitored, and improving performance is only
One scheme.
Testing result is the second untrustworthy grade, and the operation prompting message is number 6, there are significant random error,
Verify all factors for leading to precision corruption.Current state is not available effective quality tool and is monitored, improvement property
It can be unique scheme.
When data trend feature is B class in the present embodiment:
Testing result is the first confidence level, the second confidence level or first leaves a question open grade, number 7, and the operation prompting message is,
Clinical samples may be will affect, indication precision occurs abnormal.It is recommended that using nearest 20 Quality Control data standard deviation divided by with
Toward the standard deviation of lot number, if the reason of quotient greater than 1, searches random error, continues and is likely to occur Measure of Process Capability (CP)
It is abnormal.It can be followed without rule, may be reagent problem, power-supply fluctuation.It is recommended that the gap of two Quality Control points is calculated, and it is admissible
Systematic error compares, if exceeding, need to take patient's result intervention.It notes also, if since reagent difference between batch causes, it is proposed that make
With stable state section.
Testing result is second to leave a question open grade, and the operation prompting message is number 8, although there are certain systematic error,
But precision more needs to pay attention to, and verifies all factors for leading to precision corruption.Simple calibration can not solve the problems, such as, seek help when necessary
Producer.This precision is also possible to cause for reagent difference between batch, it is proposed that uses stable state interval functionality.Pay attention to checking that Hotelling counts
Measure (HotellingT2) value confirmation concentration dependence.
Testing result is the first untrustworthy grade or the second untrustworthy grade, and the operation prompting message is number 9, though
So there is certain systematic error, but precision more needs to pay attention to, verifies all factors for leading to precision corruption.Simple calibration nothing
Method solves the problems, such as that seek help producer when necessary.This precision is also possible to cause for reagent difference between batch, it is proposed that uses stable state section function
Energy.Current state is not available effective quality tool and is monitored, and improving performance is unique scheme.
When data trend feature is C class in the present embodiment:
Testing result is the first confidence level, and the operation prompting message is that number 10, there are small systematic errors, but because
Systematic variation is sufficiently small with respect to allowable error, if without departing from the systematic error of permission, on patient's result without influence, it is not recommended that dry
In advance.
Testing result is the second confidence level, and the operation prompting message is that number 11, there are certain systematic errors, can
Part rule can be violated, checks exponentially weighted moving average (EWMA) (EWMA) with the presence or absence of ascendant trend and out of control, Hotelling statistic
(HotellingT2) whether coefficient is greater than 1, if both prompting problem, lock out of control；If no problem, may for false anomaly or
False out of control, reason may cause for shared calibration deviation, can judge according to autocorrelogram, it is not recommended that calibration.Finally, passing through calculating
Whether the error exceeds the influence for allowing systematic error to confirm to patient's result.Reagent difference between batch it is also contemplated that, it is proposed that using steady
State interval functionality.
Testing result is first to leave a question open grade, and the operation prompting message is that number 12, system precision is fair, is
It unites error, and the system will affect as a result, the systematic error has arrived critical state, needs to pay attention to.Verifying all causes precision rotten
The factor lost, if whether the reagent floor-to-floor time is too long, whether illuminator, which has, is decayed.
Testing result is second to leave a question open grade, and the operation prompting message is number 13, although there are certain system mistakes
Difference, but precision more needs to pay attention to, and verifies all factors for leading to precision corruption.Calibration can not solve the problems, such as merely, when necessary
Seek help producer.This precision is also possible to cause for reagent difference between batch, it is proposed that uses stable state interval functionality.According to imprecision,
Exponentially weighted moving average (EWMA) (EWMA) figure and Hotelling statistic (HotellingT2) coefficient judges the systematic error source.
Testing result is the first untrustworthy grade or the second untrustworthy grade, and number 14, the operation prompting message is to deposit
In significant systematic error, simple calibration cannot change problem.The validity of frame need to be verified.Current state is not available
Effective quality tool is monitored, and improving performance is unique scheme.
When data trend feature is D class in the present embodiment:
Testing result is the first confidence level, the second confidence level or first leaves a question open grade that the operation prompting message is number
15, clinical samples may be will affect, exception or legacy systems error occurs in indication precision.It can be followed without rule, may be examination
Agent problem, power-supply fluctuation.It is recommended that will exceed size compared with admissible systematic error, if exceeding, patient's result need to be taken dry
In advance.It notes also, if since reagent difference between batch causes, it is proposed that use stable state section.
Testing result is second to leave a question open grade, and the operation prompting message is number 16, although there are certain system mistakes
Difference, but precision more needs to pay attention to, and verifies all factors for leading to precision corruption.Calibration can not solve the problems, such as merely, when necessary
Seek help producer.This precision is also possible to cause for reagent difference between batch, it is proposed that uses stable state interval functionality.
Testing result is the first untrustworthy grade or the second untrustworthy grade, and the operation prompting message is number 17, though
So there is certain systematic error, but precision more needs to pay attention to, verifies all factors for leading to precision corruption.Simple calibration nothing
Method solves the problems, such as that seek help producer when necessary.This precision is also possible to cause for reagent difference between batch, it is proposed that uses stable state section function
Energy.Current state is not available effective quality tool and is monitored, and improving performance is unique scheme.
When data trend feature is E class in the present embodiment:
Testing result is the first confidence level, and the operation prompting message is number 18, and indication precision occurs abnormal.But
Because systematic variation is sufficiently small with respect to allowable error, wouldn't suggest intervening.
Testing result is the second confidence level, and the operation prompting message is number 19, although in the presence of certain with chance error
Difference, but precision more needs to pay attention to, and verifies all factors for leading to precision corruption.Calibration can not solve the problems, such as merely, when necessary
Seek help producer.This precision is also possible to cause for reagent difference between batch, it is proposed that uses stable state interval functionality.Hotelling statistic
(HotellingT2) if abnormal locking occur out of control for value, otherwise suggest to intervene.
Testing result is first to leave a question open and grade or second leave a question open grade, and the operation prompting message is number 20, although there are one
Fixed systematic error, but precision more needs to pay attention to, and verifies all factors for leading to precision corruption.Simple calibration can not solve to ask
Topic, seek help producer when necessary.This precision is also possible to cause for reagent difference between batch, it is proposed that uses stable state interval functionality.Huo Te
Woods statistic (HotellingT2) if abnormal strong indication imprecision problem occurs in value.
Testing result is the first untrustworthy grade or the second untrustworthy grade, and the operation prompting message is number 21, though
So there is certain systematic error, but precision more needs to pay attention to, verifies all factors for leading to precision corruption.Simple calibration nothing
Method solves the problems, such as that seek help producer when necessary.This precision is also possible to cause for reagent difference between batch, it is proposed that uses stable state section function
Energy.Hotelling statistic (HotellingT2) if abnormal strong indication imprecision problem occurs in value.Current state can not make
It is monitored with effective quality tool, improving performance is unique scheme.
When data trend feature is F class in the present embodiment:
Testing result is the first confidence level, and the operation prompting message is that number 22, there are small systematic errors, but because
Systematic variation is sufficiently small with respect to allowable error, if without departing from the systematic error of permission, on patient's result without influence, it is not recommended that dry
In advance.
Testing result is that the second confidence level or first are left a question open grade, and the operation prompting message is that number 23, there are certain
Systematic error, may violate part rule, can check exponentially weighted moving average (EWMA) (EWMA) with the presence or absence of ascendant trend and it is out of control,
Hotelling statistic (HotellingT2) whether coefficient is greater than 1, if both prompting problem, lock out of control；It can be according to auto-correlation
Figure judgement., may be out of control for false anomaly or vacation if no problem, reason may cause for shared calibration deviation, it is not recommended that according to school
Standard solves.Finally, by calculating whether the error exceeds the influence for allowing systematic error to confirm to patient's result.Reagent difference between batch
It is also contemplated that, it is proposed that use stable state interval functionality.
Testing result is second to leave a question open grade, and the operation prompting message is number 24, although there are certain system mistakes
Difference, but precision more needs to pay attention to, and verifies all factors for leading to precision corruption.Calibration can not solve the problems, such as merely, when necessary
Seek help producer.This precision is also possible to cause for reagent difference between batch, it is proposed that uses stable state interval functionality.According to imprecision,
Exponentially weighted moving average (EWMA) (EWMA) figure and Hotelling statistic (HotellingT2) coefficient judges the systematic error source.
Testing result is the first untrustworthy grade or the second untrustworthy grade, and the operation prompting message is that number 25 is deposited
In significant systematic error, simple calibration cannot change problem.The validity of frame need to be verified.Current state is not available
Effective quality tool is monitored, and improving performance is unique scheme.
Referring to Fig. 3, for a kind of structural schematic diagram of testing result assessment device provided in an embodiment of the present invention, comprising:
Current data acquiring unit obtains the current Capability index of detection system, current energy is determined according to Capability index
Power grade, the Capability index include unilateral Capability index, and the ability rating includes unilateral ability rating；
Believable level de-termination unit determines the believable grade of current detection result according to current ability grade.
It referring to fig. 4, is a kind of structural schematic diagram of testing result assessment device provided in an embodiment of the present invention, comprising:
Current data acquiring unit obtains the current Capability index of detection system, current energy is determined according to Capability index
Power grade, the Capability index include unilateral Capability index, and the ability rating includes unilateral ability rating；
Believable level de-termination unit determines the believable grade of current detection result according to current ability grade；
Prompting message generation unit is operated, detection system current data form is obtained, according to current data form, determination is worked as
Preceding data trend feature determines operation prompting message according to data trend feature and believable grade.
The implementation process and working principle of the testing result assessment device of the embodiment of the present invention can refer to any of the above-described pair
The description of testing result appraisal procedure, details are not described herein.
Another embodiment of the present invention provides a kind of testing results to assess device, including processor, memory and storage
In the memory and it is configured as the computer program executed by the processor, the processor executes the computer
Testing result appraisal procedure described in any of the above-described inventive embodiments is realized when program.
Another embodiment of the present invention provides a kind of computer readable storage medium, the computer readable storage medium packet
Include the computer program of storage, wherein where controlling the computer readable storage medium in computer program operation
Equipment executes testing result appraisal procedure described in any of the above-described inventive embodiments.
It is the schematic diagram of testing result assessment device provided in an embodiment of the present invention referring to Fig. 6.The testing result assessment
Device includes: at least one processor 11, such as CPU, at least one network interface 14 or other users interface 13, memory
15, at least one communication bus 12, communication bus 12 is for realizing the connection communication between these components.Wherein, user interface
13 may include optionally USB interface and other standards interface, wireline interface.Network interface 14 optionally may include Wi-
Fi interface and other wireless interfaces.Memory 15 may include high speed RAM memory, it is also possible to further include non-labile deposit
Reservoir (non-volatilememory), for example, at least a magnetic disk storage.Memory 15 optionally may include at least one
A storage device for being located remotely from aforementioned processor 11.
In some embodiments, memory 15 stores following element, executable modules or data structures, or
Their subset or their superset:
Operating system 151 includes various system programs, such as battery management system, for realizing various basic businesses
And the hardware based task of processing；
Program 152.
Specifically, processor 11 is executed and is detected described in above-described embodiment for calling the program 152 stored in memory 15
Outcome evaluation method.Alternatively, the processor 11 realizes each mould in above-mentioned each Installation practice when executing the computer program
Block/unit function.
Illustratively, the computer program can be divided into one or more module/units, one or more
A module/unit is stored in the memory, and is executed by the processor, to complete the present invention.It is one or more
A module/unit can be the series of computation machine program instruction section that can complete specific function, and the instruction segment is for describing institute
State implementation procedure of the computer program in testing result assessment device.
The testing result assessment device may include, but be not limited only to, processor 11, memory 15.Those skilled in the art
Member is appreciated that the schematic diagram is only the example of testing result assessment device, does not constitute and assesses device to testing result
Restriction, may include perhaps combining certain components or different components, such as institute than illustrating more or fewer components
Stating testing result assessment device can also include input-output equipment, network access equipment, bus etc..
Alleged processor 11 can be central processing unit (Central Processing Unit, CPU), can also be
Other general processors, digital signal processor (Digital Signal Processor, DSP), specific integrated circuit
(Application Specific Integrated Circuit, ASIC), ready-made programmable gate array (Field-
Programmable Gate Array, FPGA) either other programmable logic device, discrete gate or transistor logic,
Discrete hardware components etc..General processor can be microprocessor or the processor is also possible to any conventional processor
It is the control centre of the testing result assessment device Deng, the processor 11, is entirely examined using various interfaces and connection
Survey the various pieces of outcome evaluation device.
The memory 15 can be used for storing the computer program and/or module, the processor 11 by operation or
Computer program and/or the module stored in the memory is executed, and calls the data being stored in memory, is realized
The various functions of the testing result assessment device.The memory 15 can mainly include storing program area and storage data area,
Wherein, storing program area can application program needed for storage program area, at least one function (such as sound-playing function, figure
As playing function etc.) etc.；Storage data area, which can be stored, uses created data (such as audio data, phone according to mobile phone
This etc.) etc..In addition, memory 15 may include high-speed random access memory, it can also include nonvolatile memory, such as
Hard disk, memory, plug-in type hard disk, intelligent memory card (Smart Media Card, SMC), secure digital (Secure
Digital, SD) card, flash card (Flash Card), at least one disk memory, flush memory device or other volatibility are solid
State memory device.
Wherein, if module/unit that testing result assessment device integrates is realized in the form of SFU software functional unit
And when sold or used as an independent product, it can store in a computer readable storage medium.Based on such
Understand, the present invention realizes all or part of the process in above-described embodiment method, can also instruct phase by computer program
The hardware of pass is completed, and the computer program can be stored in a computer readable storage medium, which exists
When being executed by processor, it can be achieved that the step of above-mentioned each embodiment of the method.Wherein, the computer program includes computer journey
Sequence code, the computer program code can be source code form, object identification code form, executable file or certain intermediate shapes
Formula etc..The computer-readable medium may include: any entity or device, note that can carry the computer program code
Recording medium, USB flash disk, mobile hard disk, magnetic disk, CD, computer storage, read-only memory (ROM, Read-Only Memory),
Random access memory (RAM, Random Access Memory), electric carrier signal, telecommunication signal and software distribution medium
Deng.It should be noted that the content that the computer-readable medium includes can be real according to legislation in jurisdiction and patent
The requirement trampled carries out increase and decrease appropriate, such as in certain jurisdictions, according to legislation and patent practice, computer-readable medium
It does not include electric carrier signal and telecommunication signal.
The above is a preferred embodiment of the present invention, it is noted that for those skilled in the art
For, various improvements and modifications may be made without departing from the principle of the present invention, these improvements and modifications are also considered as
Protection scope of the present invention.
Claims (10)
1. a kind of testing result appraisal procedure, which is characterized in that comprising steps of
The current Capability index of detection system is obtained, current ability rating, the Capability index packet are determined according to Capability index
Unilateral Capability index is included, the ability rating includes unilateral ability rating；
According to current ability grade, the believable grade of current detection result is determined.
2. testing result appraisal procedure as described in claim 1, which is characterized in that the ability rating includes, the first estate,
Second grade, the tertiary gradient and the fourth estate；
When the Capability index is in preset first range, the second range, third range or the 4th range, described ability etc.
Grade corresponds to the first estate, the second grade, the tertiary gradient or the fourth estate.
3. testing result appraisal procedure as claimed in claim 2, which is characterized in that the current detection result it is believable etc.
Grade includes confidence level, the grade that leaves a question open and untrustworthy grade；
Current unilateral side ability rating is the tertiary gradient or the fourth estate, then the believable grade of current detection result is confidence level；
Current unilateral side ability rating is the second grade, then the believable grade of current detection result is the grade that leaves a question open；
Current unilateral side ability rating is the first estate, then the believable grade of current detection result is untrustworthy grade.
4. testing result appraisal procedure as claimed in claim 3, which is characterized in that the Capability index further includes process capability
Index, the ability rating further include process capability grade, and the confidence level divides the first confidence level according to unilateral ability rating
With the second confidence level, the grade that leaves a question open is that first grade and second that leaves a question open leaves a question open grade according to process capability grade classification；It is described can not
Confidence level is the first untrustworthy grade and the second untrustworthy grade according to process capability grade classification.
5. testing result appraisal procedure as claimed in claim 4, which is characterized in that first confidence level and second is trusted
Grade；
Current unilateral side ability rating is the fourth estate, then the confidence level is the first confidence level；
Current unilateral side ability rating is the tertiary gradient, then the confidence level is the second confidence level.
6. testing result appraisal procedure as claimed in claim 4, which is characterized in that described first leave a question open grade, second leave a question open grade,
First untrustworthy grade and the second untrustworthy grade；
Active procedure ability rating is not the second grade, then the grade that leaves a question open is first to leave a question open grade；
Active procedure ability rating is the second grade, then the grade that leaves a question open is second to leave a question open grade.
Active procedure ability rating is not the first estate or the second grade, then the untrustworthy grade is the first untrustworthy grade；
Active procedure ability rating is the first estate or the second grade, then the untrustworthy grade is the second untrustworthy grade.
7. testing result appraisal procedure as claimed in claim 4, which is characterized in that further include:
Detection system current data form is obtained to determine current data trend feature according to current data form, become according to data
Gesture feature and believable grade determine operation prompting message.
8. a kind of testing result assesses device characterized by comprising
Current data acquiring unit obtains the current Capability index of detection system, current ability etc. is determined according to Capability index
Grade, the Capability index include unilateral Capability index, and the ability rating includes unilateral ability rating；
Believable level de-termination unit determines the believable grade of current detection result according to current ability grade.
9. a kind of testing result assesses device, including processor, memory and storage in the memory and are configured as
The computer program executed by the processor, the processor realize such as claim 1 to 7 when executing the computer program
Any one of described in testing result appraisal procedure.
10. a kind of computer readable storage medium, the computer readable storage medium includes the computer program of storage,
In, equipment where controlling the computer readable storage medium in computer program operation executes such as claim 1 to 7
Any one of described in testing result appraisal procedure.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201910069340.2A CN109903822A (en) | 2019-01-24 | 2019-01-24 | Testing result appraisal procedure and device, computer readable storage medium |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201910069340.2A CN109903822A (en) | 2019-01-24 | 2019-01-24 | Testing result appraisal procedure and device, computer readable storage medium |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN109903822A true CN109903822A (en) | 2019-06-18 |
Family
ID=66944104
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201910069340.2A Pending CN109903822A (en) | 2019-01-24 | 2019-01-24 | Testing result appraisal procedure and device, computer readable storage medium |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN109903822A (en) |
Citations (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP2005190262A (en) * | 2003-12-26 | 2005-07-14 | Renesas Technology Corp | Method for designing semiconductor integrated circuit |
| CN102090704A (en) * | 2010-09-21 | 2011-06-15 | 龙岩烟草工业有限责任公司 | Method for improving batch procedure capability of tobacco shred making process |
| CN102509243A (en) * | 2011-09-20 | 2012-06-20 | 河北中烟工业有限责任公司 | Method and system for evaluating quality in process of manufacturing cigarette |
| CN103760814A (en) * | 2014-01-29 | 2014-04-30 | 南京航空航天大学 | Multi-kind and small-quantity part production process capability index determining method based on features |
| CN106709654A (en) * | 2016-12-28 | 2017-05-24 | 中南大学 | Global operating condition evaluating and quality tracing method for hydrocracking process |
-
2019
- 2019-01-24 CN CN201910069340.2A patent/CN109903822A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP2005190262A (en) * | 2003-12-26 | 2005-07-14 | Renesas Technology Corp | Method for designing semiconductor integrated circuit |
| CN102090704A (en) * | 2010-09-21 | 2011-06-15 | 龙岩烟草工业有限责任公司 | Method for improving batch procedure capability of tobacco shred making process |
| CN102509243A (en) * | 2011-09-20 | 2012-06-20 | 河北中烟工业有限责任公司 | Method and system for evaluating quality in process of manufacturing cigarette |
| CN103760814A (en) * | 2014-01-29 | 2014-04-30 | 南京航空航天大学 | Multi-kind and small-quantity part production process capability index determining method based on features |
| CN106709654A (en) * | 2016-12-28 | 2017-05-24 | 中南大学 | Global operating condition evaluating and quality tracing method for hydrocracking process |
Non-Patent Citations (2)
| Title |
|---|
| 夏琴,徐建平: "过程能力指数在单个实验室能力验证中的应用", 《现代测量与实验室管理》 * |
| 汪洁: "面向检测实验室的测量系统分析理论与应用研究", 《中国优秀硕士学位论文全文数据库，经济与管理科学辑》 * |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US10197993B2 (en) | Method and system for performing quality control on a diagnostic analyzer | |
| US7925461B2 (en) | Quality control system, analyzer, and quality control method | |
| US6512986B1 (en) | Method for automated exception-based quality control compliance for point-of-care devices | |
| Badrick | Integrating quality control and external quality assurance | |
| Dogu et al. | MSstatsQC: Longitudinal system suitability monitoring and quality control for targeted proteomic experiments | |
| CN101387649A (en) | Sample analyzer | |
| Favaloro et al. | Harmonizing the International Normalized Ratio (INR) standardization of methods and use of novel strategies to reduce interlaboratory variation and bias | |
| CN106339569A (en) | Method and a device for determining abnormality of sample test result | |
| Wang et al. | Analytical comparison between two hematological analyzer systems: Mindray BC‐5180 vs Sysmex XN‐1000 | |
| JP2011075468A (en) | Specimen inspection apparatus | |
| CN111406294B (en) | Automatically generating rules for laboratory instruments | |
| JP4746471B2 (en) | Accuracy management system, accuracy management server and computer program | |
| Laubender et al. | Selection of within‐run quality control rules for laboratory biomarkers | |
| CN109903822A (en) | Testing result appraisal procedure and device, computer readable storage medium | |
| Favaloro et al. | Post-analytical issues in hemostasis and thrombosis testing: an update | |
| US20240044926A1 (en) | System and method for conducting automated clinical diagnostic crossover studies | |
| US20200219594A1 (en) | Quantification of sequencing instruments and reagents for use in molecular diagnostic methods | |
| CN113921128A (en) | Automatic medical detection data software auditing method and electronic equipment | |
| van Rossum | An approach to selecting auto-verification limits and validating their error detection performance independently for pre-analytical and analytical errors | |
| JP2003166988A (en) | Clinical inspection system | |
| CN109616191A (en) | The continuous capability appraisal procedure and device of detection system | |
| CN109599173A (en) | The unilateral capability assessment method and device of detection system | |
| CN108829641B (en) | Measurement process checking method based on statistical technology | |
| CN114885231B (en) | Communication protocol self-adaptive signal acquisition method, system, terminal and medium | |
| JP4590456B2 (en) | Clinical laboratory system server |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |
Application publication date: 20190618 |
|
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |