CN109858769A - A kind of Graduation Project of Undergraduates instructs the evaluation method of quality - Google Patents
A kind of Graduation Project of Undergraduates instructs the evaluation method of quality Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN109858769A CN109858769A CN201910000760.5A CN201910000760A CN109858769A CN 109858769 A CN109858769 A CN 109858769A CN 201910000760 A CN201910000760 A CN 201910000760A CN 109858769 A CN109858769 A CN 109858769A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- achievement
- student
- graduation project
- graduation
- project
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 9
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 12
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000013139 quantization Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012549 training Methods 0.000 description 1
Landscapes
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
- Electrically Operated Instructional Devices (AREA)
Abstract
The invention discloses the evaluation methods that a kind of Graduation Project of Undergraduates instructs quality.To the full Major for carrying out graduation project, their hundred-mark system achievements acquired in each door required course before graduation project are collected；It is normalized using the average achievement and achievement of the performance standard difference to the subject of all students in every subject, obtains opposite achievement；Average achievement and the performance standard for obtaining opposite achievement of the every student in various courses are poor；Graduation project achievement is normalized with performance standard difference using the average achievement of students all in graduation project, obtains graduation project with respect to achievement；The graduation project of every student is compared with the average opposite achievement that the life obtains in required course with opposite performance standard difference with respect to achievement, obtains the evaluation index that Graduation Project of Undergraduates instructs quality.It is that can determine whether the graduation project instruction course of student with the presence or absence of obvious insufficient using the index.
Description
Technical field
The present invention relates to higher education application field, specifically a kind of Graduation Project of Undergraduates instructs the evaluation method of quality.
Background technique
Graduation Project of Undergraduates is a kind of very important culture link of undergraduate stage, and training quality is for education of undergraduate course
Quality play a significant role.Although the dissertation appraisal and final reply by Graduation Project of Undergraduates can be to Graduation Project of Undergraduates
The quality of completion is evaluated, but the evaluation but fails to distinguish the shadow that student's self-ability completes graduation project quality
Loud and graduation project instruction course quality completes graduation project the influence of quality.
Therefore, it is necessary to obtain a kind of objective, quantization index, the quality of graduation project instruction course can be subject to
Evaluation, so as to effectively find that there are the instruction courses of obvious problem, and then can targetedly be improved.But
Current such quantizating index still belongs to rarely seen.
Summary of the invention
The technical problems to be solved by the invention are to find a kind of objective, quantization index, can be used to measure undergraduate course
The quality of graduation project instruction course.
In order to solve the above technical problems, solution proposed by the present invention are as follows: finished using the student for carrying out graduation project
Acquired school grade, to assess the ability of student, and obtains the phase that they should obtain in graduation project before industry design
Hope achievement；The graduation project achievement that they are actually obtained again can find that deviation is obvious between the two compared with aspiration achievement
Those of student, their graduation project instruction course be just likely that there are obvious problem.
Evaluation method of the present invention specifically includes the following steps:
I. the hundred-mark system that full profession carries out all required courses of the student of graduation project before graduation project starts is collected
Achievement S (i, j), wherein 1≤i≤M indicates the serial number of the student, 1≤j≤N indicates the serial number of the required course, and M indicates institute
The number of student is stated, N indicates the door number of the required course；
Ii. the required course j described in each door, seeks that all students are acquired in this required course to be averaged
The standard deviation sigma (j) of achievement μ (j) and achievement, and such as by achievement student i described in every acquired in this required course
Under be converted into the opposite achievement S that this student obtains in this required courseR(i, j):
SR(i, j)=[S (i, j)-μ (j)]/σ (j)；
Iii. to the student i described in every, it is acquired described opposite in all required courses to seek the student
The average value mu of achievementR(i) and the standard deviation sigma of the opposite achievementR(i)；
Iv. the hundred-mark system achievement D (i) for collecting the graduation project of all students seeks finishing for all students
The average achievement μ of industry designDAnd the standard deviation sigma of graduation project achievementD；
V. to the student i described in every, quality index k is instructed in the graduation project for seeking the student as followsPD(i):
kPD(i)=[D (i)-μD]/σD；
For given level of significance α, 0 < α < 1 enables ZαIndicate the upper α quantile of standardized normal distribution, then when
kPD(i)>Zα/2
When, it is believed that the graduation project of the student instructs quality obviously preferable；When
kPD(i)<Z1-α/2
When, it is believed that the graduation project of the student instructs quality obviously poor.
In conclusion method provided by the present invention, can make different courses by normalizing the achievement of different courses
Achievement have comparativity, then using the average value of the course achievement of student as its horizontal index is measured, utilize its class
Whether the equation of Cheng Chengji judges student's graduation project achievement in its level as its index for showing degree of fluctuation of measurement
Normal fluctuation range etc, found other than student ability itself with this, because of the influence caused by graduation project guidance, from
And the influence can be evaluated.
Detailed description of the invention
Fig. 1 for the present invention in mentioned method overall procedure block diagram；
Fig. 2 is that the curve graph of quality index is instructed in the graduation project of A year embodiment middle school student；
Fig. 3 is that the curve graph of quality index is instructed in the graduation project of B year embodiment middle school student；
Fig. 4 is that the curve graph of quality index is instructed in the graduation project of C year embodiment middle school student；
Fig. 5 is that the section distribution map of quality index is instructed in the graduation project of A year embodiment middle school student；
Fig. 6 is that the section distribution map of quality index is instructed in the graduation project of B year embodiment middle school student；
Fig. 7 is that the section distribution map of quality index is instructed in the graduation project of C year embodiment middle school student.
Specific embodiment
The present invention is described in further details below with reference to the drawings and specific embodiments.
The overall procedure block diagram of the mentioned method of the present invention is as shown in Figure 1.
We have selected the graduation project of certain nearlyr 3 years professional (being referred to as A, B, C year) as embodiment, to this
The effect for inventing proposed method is verified.
In terms of the selection of the required course, we are also divided into two groups: big curriculum group according to the difference of selection situation
It include learning subject, learning class course and professional core class；Small curriculum group only includes learning class course and professional core class.Considered
The graduation project that is calculated of three annual different curriculum groups instruct quality index curve as in Figure 2-4, wherein real
Line is that big curriculum group provides as a result, dotted line is the result that small curriculum group provides.
By Fig. 2-4 as it can be seen that the plots changes of two curriculum groups are almost the same, show the method that is mentioned of the present invention be compared with
It is believable to stablize.
Three annual student's graduation projects instruct the section of quality index to be distributed as illustrated in figs. 5-7 in embodiment.
By Fig. 5-7 as it can be seen that the index shows the form of more apparent intermediate similar normal distribution high, both ends are low,
The level embodied in the graduation project practical manifestation of Most students and usually course is not much different, and also shows the index
It is credible.
We are poor by graduation project practical manifestation, and fallen in usually course embody 90% horizontal confidence interval it
Totally 12 people have carried out into one the quasi- topic of its graduation project, paper and reply situation as apparent sample is deviateed outer student
Step analysis.Wherein have that 5 Genus Homos are bigger than normal in the quasi- topic difficulty of graduation project, and can for reference and the resource that utilizes is on the low side；There is the work of 3 people
Make still, but writing is half-hearted, it is not tight to check on to show that instructor may close thesis writing；There are 2 Genus Homos in instructor's mistake
Thread management is not in place, and it is few to meet number with student, fails to provide abundant guidance；There is 1 people since job hunting occupies the plenty of time, after
Phase fails to complete graduation project by desired quality；There are also 1 Genus Homos not enough to rectify in student attitude itself, and instructor fails to grip with
People.From the point of view of the result analyzed according to specific circumstances, the method that the present invention is mentioned effectively has found finishing for the problem of being implicitly present in
Industry design guidance process, shows the validity of method.
Claims (1)
1. a kind of Graduation Project of Undergraduates instructs the evaluation method of quality, student's self-ability can be excluded, matter is completed to graduation project
The influence of amount, so as to evaluate the shadow for completing quality to graduation project due to factors such as instructor's proposition, supervision and guidances
It rings；Method proposed by the invention the following steps are included:
I. the hundred-mark system achievement S that full profession carries out all required courses of the student of graduation project before graduation project starts is collected
(i, j), wherein 1≤i≤M indicates the serial number of the student, 1≤j≤N indicates the serial number of the required course, and M indicates the student
Number, N indicates the door number of the required course；
Ii. the required course j described in each door seeks all students average achievement acquired in this required course
The standard deviation sigma (j) of μ (j) and achievement, and the achievement acquired in this required course of student i described in every is turned as follows
Turn to the opposite achievement S that this student obtains in this required courseR(i, j):
SR(i, j)=[S (i, j)-μ (j)]/σ (j)；
Iii. to the student i described in every, the student opposite achievement acquired in all required courses is sought
Average value muR(i) and the standard deviation sigma of the opposite achievementR(i)；
Iv. the hundred-mark system achievement D (i) of the graduation project of all students is collected, the graduation for seeking all students is set
The average achievement μ of meterDAnd the standard deviation sigma of graduation project achievementD；
V. to the student i described in every, quality index k is instructed in the graduation project for seeking the student as followsPD(i):
kPD(i)=[D (i)-μD]/σD；
For given level of significance α, 0 < α < 1 enables ZαIndicate the upper α quantile of standardized normal distribution, then when
kPD(i)>Zα/2
When, it is believed that the graduation project of the student instructs quality obviously preferable；When
kPD(i)<Z1-α/2
When, it is believed that the graduation project of the student instructs quality obviously poor.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201910000760.5A CN109858769B (en) | 2019-01-02 | 2019-01-02 | Gramineae graduation design guidance quality evaluation method |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201910000760.5A CN109858769B (en) | 2019-01-02 | 2019-01-02 | Gramineae graduation design guidance quality evaluation method |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN109858769A true CN109858769A (en) | 2019-06-07 |
| CN109858769B CN109858769B (en) | 2024-03-15 |
Family
ID=66893665
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201910000760.5A Active CN109858769B (en) | 2019-01-02 | 2019-01-02 | Gramineae graduation design guidance quality evaluation method |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN109858769B (en) |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN110458738A (en) * | 2019-08-21 | 2019-11-15 | 广州经信纬通信息科技有限公司 | A kind of Graduate Project instructs system with wisdom |
Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20120219938A1 (en) * | 2011-02-24 | 2012-08-30 | Al-Shammari Zaid N | Process for Analyzing Effectiveness of a Course of Study |
| CN105894407A (en) * | 2014-10-24 | 2016-08-24 | 丁洁 | Method for evaluating learning ability development trend of students |
| CN107169654A (en) * | 2017-05-12 | 2017-09-15 | 北京航空航天大学 | A kind of method and system for analyzing students'comprehensive ability |
-
2019
- 2019-01-02 CN CN201910000760.5A patent/CN109858769B/en active Active
Patent Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20120219938A1 (en) * | 2011-02-24 | 2012-08-30 | Al-Shammari Zaid N | Process for Analyzing Effectiveness of a Course of Study |
| CN105894407A (en) * | 2014-10-24 | 2016-08-24 | 丁洁 | Method for evaluating learning ability development trend of students |
| CN107169654A (en) * | 2017-05-12 | 2017-09-15 | 北京航空航天大学 | A kind of method and system for analyzing students'comprehensive ability |
Non-Patent Citations (3)
| Title |
|---|
| 吴宗平, 侯朝铭, 刘玮: "外科学考核方法雏议", 四川省卫生管理干部学院学报, no. 01 * |
| 孙守昌;韩红芳;林康红;: "高校毕业设计质量评价指标体系的建立与实践", 中国电力教育, no. 31 * |
| 李松;: ""群组式"毕业设计指导模式评价分析――以新疆农业大学人文地理与城乡规划专业为例", 科教导刊(下旬), no. 02 * |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN110458738A (en) * | 2019-08-21 | 2019-11-15 | 广州经信纬通信息科技有限公司 | A kind of Graduate Project instructs system with wisdom |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN109858769B (en) | 2024-03-15 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Alkhateeb et al. | Assessment of learning and study strategies of university students in Qatar using an Arabic translation of the learning and study strategies inventory | |
| Ennulat et al. | Evaluation of multiple variables predicting the likelihood of passage and failure of PANCE | |
| Morrison et al. | The passing score in the objective structured clinical examination | |
| Ludwig-Mayerhofer et al. | 16 Vocational education and training and transitions into the labor market | |
| CN109858769A (en) | A kind of Graduation Project of Undergraduates instructs the evaluation method of quality | |
| Miller et al. | Competency, coping, and contributory life skills development of early adolescents | |
| Gill et al. | The accuracy of forecast grades for OCR A levels in June 2012 | |
| Weeden | How do we link assessment to making progress in geography? | |
| Sari et al. | WORK PLACEMENT, ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENT AND EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE:: EVALUATION OF PUBLIC SERVICE OFFICES IN INDONESIA | |
| Drahozal et al. | Riverside comments on the Friends for Education report | |
| Alvi et al. | A study of the criterion-related validity of Crites' Career Maturity Inventory | |
| Sarbin et al. | New criteria for old | |
| CN109377805A (en) | A kind of assessment method of middle and primary schools' innovation ability | |
| Keller | College Performance of New Maryland High School Graduates: Student Outcome and Achievement Report. | |
| CN110414769A (en) | Student's career evaluation system | |
| CN110298580A (en) | A kind of professional potential evaluation system based on manpower resources development | |
| Durost et al. | An Improved Method of Comparing a Capacity Measure with an Achievement Measure at the Elementary School Level | |
| Spache | A comparison of certain oral reading tests | |
| Miller | Readability versus reading ability | |
| Young | AN EVALUATION OF A PONTOON TRANSITIONAL DESIGN--NINTH GRADE LOW ABILITY LEVEL STUDENTS | |
| Alspaugh et al. | Determination of reading expectancy | |
| Ponte et al. | Evaluating and improving soil judging contests based on a selected proficiency level | |
| Keller | College Performance of New Maryland High School Graduates: Student Outcome and Achievement Report. | |
| Weinstein | Evaluation of accounting students | |
| Lindsay | The assessment of transient patterns on historic maps—a case study |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant |