CN109808508B - Fault-tolerant control strategy for driving system of distributed driving electric automobile - Google Patents
Fault-tolerant control strategy for driving system of distributed driving electric automobile Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN109808508B CN109808508B CN201910126899.4A CN201910126899A CN109808508B CN 109808508 B CN109808508 B CN 109808508B CN 201910126899 A CN201910126899 A CN 201910126899A CN 109808508 B CN109808508 B CN 109808508B
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- vehicle
- control
- driving
- wheel
- moment
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
- 238000011217 control strategy Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 28
- 238000005457 optimization Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 8
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 230000001133 acceleration Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000005484 gravity Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007613 environmental effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02T—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO TRANSPORTATION
- Y02T10/00—Road transport of goods or passengers
- Y02T10/60—Other road transportation technologies with climate change mitigation effect
- Y02T10/72—Electric energy management in electromobility
Landscapes
- Electric Propulsion And Braking For Vehicles (AREA)
- Arrangement And Driving Of Transmission Devices (AREA)
Abstract
The invention discloses a fault-tolerant control strategy of a driving system of a distributed driving electric automobile, which is used for carrying out fault-tolerant control on a vehicle under the condition that a certain wheel is known to be invalid; and (3) upper layer control: selecting yaw velocity and mass center deflection angle of the vehicle as control targets, establishing a vehicle yaw moment control system under failure fault, and calculating to obtain an expected yaw moment through a sliding mode variable structure control strategy based on constraint of the yaw velocity and the mass center deflection angle; and (3) controlling the lower layer: the dynamic and stability torque coordination optimization distribution strategy is realized through sliding mode variable structure control or LQR respectively, the distribution of wheel torque is calculated by combining the expected yaw moment, the torque redistribution is carried out on the wheels which normally work, and the driving stability of the vehicle is ensured. The invention can redistribute the moment of wheels which normally work, and the wheels can meet the preset driving track to the maximum extent, thereby avoiding sudden change and ensuring the safety and stability of vehicle driving.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to the field of distributed drive electric vehicle control, in particular to a fault-tolerant control strategy of a drive system of a distributed drive electric vehicle.
Background
Under the current environmental situation, the electric vehicle is a hot spot and a key point for the research of the automobile industry. The distributed driving electric automobile is one electric automobile, has the advantage that four wheels can be independently driven, is more convenient to control the longitudinal force of each tire, and can better reduce damage and loss caused by failure when the failure condition occurs.
The existing stability or dynamic control strategy is generally based on a vehicle in a normal driving state, and the fault-tolerant control strategy applicable to the failure condition has fewer patents. If the driving failure condition occurs suddenly in the driving process of the vehicle, the fault-tolerant control is not carried out in time, and the driving safety can be seriously influenced.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention aims to solve the technical problem of providing a fault-tolerant control strategy of a driving system of a distributed driving electric automobile aiming at the defects in the prior art.
The technical scheme adopted by the invention for solving the technical problems is as follows:
the invention provides a fault-tolerant control strategy of a driving system of a distributed driving electric automobile.A controller at the upper layer of the driving system of the electric automobile adopts sliding mode variable structure control, and a controller at the lower layer of the driving system of the electric automobile adopts sliding mode variable structure control or LQR; the fault-tolerant control strategy comprises the following steps:
under the condition that a certain wheel is known to be invalid, fault-tolerant control of the vehicle is carried out by adopting a fault-tolerant control strategy;
and (3) upper layer control: selecting yaw velocity and mass center deflection angle of the vehicle as control targets, establishing a vehicle yaw moment control system under failure fault, and calculating to obtain an expected yaw moment through a sliding mode variable structure control strategy based on constraint of the yaw velocity and the mass center deflection angle;
and (3) controlling the lower layer: the dynamic and stability torque coordination optimization distribution strategy is realized through sliding mode variable structure control or LQR respectively, the distribution of wheel torque is calculated by combining the expected yaw moment, the torque redistribution is carried out on the wheels which normally work, and the driving stability of the vehicle is ensured.
Further, the sliding mode variable structure control is adopted in the upper layer control to obtain the expected yaw moment of the vehicle; an additional yaw moment controller is designed, and a sliding mode variable structure is used for controlling to obtain an expected additional yaw moment M; selecting a centroid side slip angle beta and a yaw velocity gamma as state variables, inputting the errors of the centroid side slip angle beta and the yaw velocity gamma of the vehicle and actual values, and outputting the errors as M, wherein the formula is as follows:
s=eγ-c·eβ=γd-γ+c·(βd-β)
wherein c and epsilon are design parameters of the controller, beta is a centroid slip angle, and betadTo the desired centroid slip angle, gamma is the yaw rate, gammadFor the desired yaw rate, m is the vehicle service mass, vxFor longitudinal vehicle speed, Fyf、FyrTransverse forces, δ, of the front and rear wheels of the vehiclefAngle of rotation of front wheel, αf、αrIs a front and rear wheel side slip angle lf、lrIs the distance of the center of mass to the front and rear axes, kf、krFor front and rear wheel cornering stiffness, IZIs the moment of inertia of the vehicle about the Z axis.
Furthermore, a dynamic and stable torque coordination optimization allocation strategy is adopted in the lower-layer control, two control strategies are realized through sliding mode variable structure control or LQR, software redundancy is realized, and the condition of software errors is reduced.
Further, the specific method adopting the sliding mode variable structure control strategy in the lower layer control of the invention comprises the following steps:
in the upper layer control, a desired driving moment T is obtained by using sliding mode variable structure control; firstly, establishing a relation between an additional yaw moment M and a longitudinal slip ratio lambda: tong (Chinese character of 'tong')Obtaining an additional yaw moment M and a tire longitudinal force F through a dynamic equationxThe corresponding slip rate lambda is obtained by looking up a table through a magic formula, so that the expected additional yaw moment obtained by the upper-layer controller is converted to obtain the longitudinal slip rate lambda; establishing the relation between lambda and T through the slip ratio; selecting a longitudinal slip ratio lambda as a state variable, and taking an error between a desired value and an actual value as a control input to finally obtain a driving torque; the calculation formula is as follows:
Wherein λ is longitudinal slip ratio, λdQ is a sliding mode controller design parameter, v, for a desired longitudinal slip ratioxIs the longitudinal vehicle speed, omega is the rotational angular speed of the vehicle, R represents the wheel radius, TtRepresenting the driving torque, mu being the road adhesion coefficient, FzThe vertical load of the vehicle, J represents the moment of inertia of the wheel, and g is the acceleration of gravity.
Further, the specific method for adopting the LQR control strategy in the lower layer control of the present invention is as follows:
the moment distribution after failure is controlled by the LQR, the expected yaw moment is generated by applying driving forces with different magnitudes to four independently driven wheels, and the following formula is the moment variation quantity required by the four wheels obtained by controlling the moment distribution according to the LQR:
where M is the additional yaw moment obtained by the upper level controller, R represents the wheel radius, df、drFor front and rear wheelbases, /)f、lrIs the distance of the center of mass to the front and rear axes, δfIs the corner of the front wheel.
Further, the dynamic and stability torque coordination optimization allocation strategy in the lower layer control of the invention adds longitudinal driving force, maximum driving force and maximum ground adhesion as the constraint conditions aiming at the vehicle running theory:
road adhesion and limitation of longitudinal force to be able to provide maximum driving force:
max(-μFzi,-Fm)≤Fxi≤min(μFzi,Fm)
wherein, FxiAs longitudinal force of the wheel, FyiAs a lateral force of the wheel, FziIs the vertical wheel load, mu is the road adhesion coefficient, FmIs the maximum value of the wheel longitudinal force.
The invention has the following beneficial effects: the fault-tolerant control strategy of the driving system of the distributed driving electric automobile carries out fault-tolerant control on the problem of driving failure in the driving process of the automobile, the upper layer obtains expected yaw moment according to sliding mode variable structure control, and the lower layer obtains the moment distributed to each wheel through sliding mode variable structure control or LQR (linear quadratic regulator). The wheels which normally work are redistributed in torque, so that the wheels can meet the preset driving track to the maximum extent, sudden changes are avoided, and the driving safety and stability of the vehicle are ensured.
Drawings
The invention will be further described with reference to the accompanying drawings and examples, in which:
FIG. 1 is a schematic structural diagram of an embodiment of the present invention;
Detailed Description
In order to make the objects, technical solutions and advantages of the present invention more apparent, the present invention is described in further detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings and embodiments. It should be understood that the specific embodiments described herein are merely illustrative of the invention and are not intended to limit the invention.
As shown in fig. 1, in the driving system of the electric vehicle, an upper controller is controlled by a sliding mode variable structure, and a lower controller is controlled by a sliding mode variable structure or LQR; the fault-tolerant control strategy comprises the following steps:
under the condition that a certain wheel is known to be invalid, fault-tolerant control of the vehicle is carried out by adopting a fault-tolerant control strategy;
and (3) upper layer control: selecting yaw velocity and mass center deflection angle of the vehicle as control targets, establishing a vehicle yaw moment control system under failure fault, and calculating to obtain an expected yaw moment through a sliding mode variable structure control strategy based on constraint of the yaw velocity and the mass center deflection angle;
and (3) controlling the lower layer: the dynamic and stability torque coordination optimization distribution strategy is realized through sliding mode variable structure control or LQR respectively, the distribution of wheel torque is calculated by combining the expected yaw moment, the torque redistribution is carried out on the wheels which normally work, and the driving stability of the vehicle is ensured.
Assuming that the longitudinal force of each vehicle can be detected, the present invention performs fault tolerant control in the event that a certain wheel is known to fail. And the upper layer controller performs sliding mode control according to the difference value of the yaw velocity and the centroid side slip angle to obtain the expected yaw moment. When the lower layer implements the control, the distribution of the wheel moment is determined through the yaw moment.
And inputting the actual yaw velocity and the centroid side slip angle into the upper layer, calculating the expected yaw moment M through a sliding mode formula, and inputting the expected yaw moment M into a lower layer controller.
s=eγ-c·eβ=γd-γ+c·(βd-β)
the lower layer input is the desired yaw moment M.
(1) Taking sliding mode variable structure control as an example, the input is a desired yaw moment M, and M and a longitudinal force F can be obtained by an automobile dynamic modelxijThe relationship of (1):
M=Fxfl·(sinδf·lf-d·cosδf/2)+Fxfr·(sinδf·lf+d·cosδf/2)-Fxrl·d/2+Fxrrd/2, obtaining the expected longitudinal force according to the obtained expected yaw moment, looking up a table by a tire formula to obtain the expected slip ratio lambda, and inputting the expected slip ratio lambda into a sliding mode controller for further solving.
(2) Taking LQR control as an example, the moment delta T of the wheel required to be changed is calculatedijAnd then carrying out torque adjustment on the wheels which normally work according to the failure condition.
Where M is the additional yaw moment obtained by the upper level controller, R represents the wheel radius, df、drFor the front and rear wheelbases, /)f、lrIs the distance of the center of mass to the front and rear axes, δfIs the corner of the front wheel.
If the left front wheel is out of order,
the desired torque for the right front wheel is then:
the desired torque for the right rear wheel is then:
the desired torque for the left rear wheel is then:
and if other wheels fail, corresponding algorithms are provided.
Two underlying control strategies can implement software redundancy, one of which can be compensated for if a large deviation occurs.
It will be appreciated that modifications and variations are possible to those skilled in the art in light of the above teachings, and it is intended to cover all such modifications and variations as fall within the scope of the appended claims.
Claims (2)
1. A fault-tolerant control strategy of a driving system of a distributed driving electric automobile is characterized in that in the driving system of the electric automobile, an upper-layer controller adopts sliding mode variable structure control, and a lower-layer controller adopts sliding mode variable structure control or LQR; the fault-tolerant control strategy comprises the following steps:
under the condition that a certain wheel is known to be invalid, fault-tolerant control of the vehicle is carried out by adopting a fault-tolerant control strategy;
and (3) upper layer control: selecting yaw velocity and mass center deflection angle of the vehicle as control targets, establishing a vehicle yaw moment control system under failure fault, and calculating to obtain an expected yaw moment through a sliding mode variable structure control strategy based on constraint of the yaw velocity and the mass center deflection angle;
and (3) controlling the lower layer: the dynamic and stability torque coordination optimization distribution strategy is realized through sliding mode variable structure control or LQR respectively, the distribution of wheel torque is calculated by combining an expected yaw moment, the torque redistribution is carried out on wheels which normally work, and the driving stability of the vehicle is ensured;
in the upper layer control, the sliding mode variable structure control is adopted to obtain the expected yaw moment of the vehicle; an additional yaw moment controller is designed, and a sliding mode variable structure is used for controlling to obtain an expected additional yaw moment M; selecting a centroid side slip angle beta and a yaw velocity gamma as state variables, inputting the errors of the centroid side slip angle beta and the yaw velocity gamma of the vehicle and actual values, and outputting the errors as M, wherein the formula is as follows:
s=eγ-c·eβ=γd-γ+c·(βd-β)
wherein c and epsilon are design parameters of the controller, beta is a centroid slip angle, and betadTo the desired centroid slip angle, gamma is the yaw rate, gammadPeriod of time ofThe expected yaw angular velocity, m is the overall vehicle servicing quality, vxFor longitudinal vehicle speed, Fyf、FyrTransverse forces, δ, of the front and rear wheels of the vehiclefAngle of rotation of front wheel, αf、αrIs a front and rear wheel side slip angle lf、lrIs the distance of the center of mass to the front and rear axes, kf、krFor front and rear wheel cornering stiffness, IZThe moment of inertia of the vehicle around the Z axis;
in the lower-layer control, a dynamic and stable torque coordination optimization distribution strategy is adopted, two control strategies are realized through sliding mode variable structure control or LQR, software redundancy is realized, and the condition of software errors is reduced;
the specific method for adopting the sliding mode variable structure control strategy in the lower layer control comprises the following steps:
in the upper layer control, a desired driving moment T is obtained by using sliding mode variable structure control; firstly, establishing a relation between an additional yaw moment M and a longitudinal slip ratio lambda: obtaining an additional yaw moment M and a tire longitudinal force F through a dynamic equationxThe corresponding slip rate lambda is obtained by looking up a table through a magic formula, so that the expected additional yaw moment obtained by the upper-layer controller is converted to obtain the longitudinal slip rate lambda; establishing the relation between lambda and T through the slip ratio; selecting a longitudinal slip ratio lambda as a state variable, and taking an error between a desired value and an actual value as a control input to finally obtain a driving torque; the calculation formula is as follows:
Wherein λ is longitudinal slip ratio, λdQ is a sliding mode controller design parameter, v, for a desired longitudinal slip ratioxFor longitudinal vehicle speed, ω is vehicle angular velocity, R represents wheel radius, TtRepresenting the driving torque, mu being the road adhesion coefficient, FzThe vertical load of the vehicle is represented by J, the moment of inertia of the wheel is represented by g, and the gravity acceleration is represented by g;
the specific method for adopting the LQR control strategy in the lower-layer control comprises the following steps:
the moment distribution after failure is controlled by the LQR, the expected yaw moment is generated by applying driving forces with different magnitudes to four independently driven wheels, and the following formula is the moment variation quantity required by the four wheels obtained by controlling the moment distribution according to the LQR:
where M is the additional yaw moment obtained by the upper level controller, R represents the wheel radius, df、drFor front and rear wheelbases, /)f、lrIs the distance of the center of mass to the front and rear axes, δfIs the corner of the front wheel.
2. The fault-tolerant control strategy of the driving system of the distributed driving electric automobile according to claim 1, characterized in that a dynamic and stability torque coordination optimization distribution strategy in the lower layer control adds longitudinal driving force, can provide maximum driving force and takes the maximum ground adhesion as the constraint condition aiming at the vehicle driving theory:
road adhesion and limitation of longitudinal force to be able to provide maximum driving force:
max(-μFzi,-Fm)≤Fxi≤min(μFzi,Fm)
wherein, FxiAs longitudinal force of the wheel, FyiAs lateral wheel forces, FziIs the vertical wheel load, mu is the road adhesion coefficient, FmIs the maximum value of the wheel longitudinal force.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201910126899.4A CN109808508B (en) | 2019-02-20 | 2019-02-20 | Fault-tolerant control strategy for driving system of distributed driving electric automobile |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201910126899.4A CN109808508B (en) | 2019-02-20 | 2019-02-20 | Fault-tolerant control strategy for driving system of distributed driving electric automobile |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN109808508A CN109808508A (en) | 2019-05-28 |
CN109808508B true CN109808508B (en) | 2022-06-17 |
Family
ID=66607027
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN201910126899.4A Active CN109808508B (en) | 2019-02-20 | 2019-02-20 | Fault-tolerant control strategy for driving system of distributed driving electric automobile |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN109808508B (en) |
Families Citing this family (11)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN110334312B (en) * | 2019-06-28 | 2021-01-15 | 武汉理工大学 | Control method of disc type hub motor driven vehicle with fault-tolerant control function |
CN111002840B (en) * | 2019-12-24 | 2022-07-12 | 大连理工大学 | Fault-tolerant control method for distributed driving electric automobile |
CN111619574B (en) * | 2020-05-18 | 2022-06-10 | 奇瑞汽车股份有限公司 | Vehicle control method, device, controller and storage medium |
CN111559389A (en) * | 2020-06-22 | 2020-08-21 | 江苏理工学院 | Control method of intelligent automobile under variable adhesion coefficient repeatability track |
CN112224036B (en) * | 2020-10-28 | 2022-08-05 | 北京理工大学 | Four-wheel driving torque distribution method and system for distributed driving electric vehicle |
CN112784355A (en) * | 2020-12-21 | 2021-05-11 | 吉林大学 | Fourteen-degree-of-freedom vehicle dynamics model modeling method based on multi-body dynamics |
CN112886905B (en) * | 2021-04-13 | 2022-10-14 | 吉林大学 | Rule-based fault-tolerant control method for driving eight-wheel electric wheel drive vehicle |
CN113320523B (en) * | 2021-07-05 | 2023-04-25 | 常熟理工学院 | Distributed driving electric automobile straight driving direction stable control method |
CN114987441B (en) * | 2022-05-20 | 2024-09-24 | 燕山大学 | Active safety control system and method based on four-wheel independent driving/braking vehicle |
CN115782587B (en) * | 2022-11-30 | 2024-06-07 | 南京理工大学 | Active fault-tolerant control method based on single motor failure transverse dynamics cluster analysis |
CN118457274B (en) * | 2024-07-12 | 2024-10-08 | 广汽埃安新能源汽车股份有限公司 | Torque distribution control method and device of electric automobile and electric automobile |
Family Cites Families (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN102442223B (en) * | 2011-10-21 | 2013-11-06 | 清华大学 | Distributed driving type electric automobile failure control system based on quadratic optimization |
CN104494464B (en) * | 2014-12-25 | 2017-01-25 | 西安交通大学 | Multi-motor coordination controller for distributed driving electric automobile |
CN107139775A (en) * | 2017-04-26 | 2017-09-08 | 江苏大学 | A kind of electric car direct yaw moment control method based on Non-smooth surface technology |
-
2019
- 2019-02-20 CN CN201910126899.4A patent/CN109808508B/en active Active
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN109808508A (en) | 2019-05-28 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN109808508B (en) | Fault-tolerant control strategy for driving system of distributed driving electric automobile | |
CN107472082B (en) | driving torque distribution method and system of four-wheel drive electric automobile and electric automobile | |
CN110481338B (en) | Wheel hub motor vehicle failure control method and vehicle control unit | |
CN109606133B (en) | Distributed driving electric vehicle torque vector control method based on double-layer control | |
CN109733205B (en) | Direct yaw moment control method for hub electric vehicle with fault-tolerant function | |
CN111267834B (en) | Vehicle yaw stability prediction control method and system | |
CN110126643B (en) | Control method and system for distributed driving electric automobile in motor failure state | |
CN110481334B (en) | Four-wheel independent drive electric vehicle robust self-adaptive fault-tolerant control method based on disturbance observation | |
CN109291803B (en) | Stability control method based on four-wheel all-wheel-drive electric vehicle virtual wheel | |
CN109291932B (en) | Feedback-based electric vehicle yaw stability real-time control device and method | |
US20220396111A1 (en) | Method to control the active shock absorbers of a road vehicle featuring the adjustment of the roll angle and of the pitch angle | |
CN112373459B (en) | Method for controlling upper-layer motion state of four-hub motor-driven vehicle | |
CN112644455B (en) | Distributed driving vehicle running stability control method | |
CN108177692A (en) | A kind of differential power-assisted steering of electric wheel drive vehicle and stability control method for coordinating | |
WO2022266824A1 (en) | Steering control method and apparatus | |
CN113978263A (en) | Electric automobile stability control method with driving wheel skid resistance and torque optimization fusion | |
CN111965977B (en) | Automobile stability control method based on equal backup capacity of tire | |
CN109017805A (en) | One kind is for there are probabilistic driving system vehicle stability control methods | |
CN112373293A (en) | Fault processing method for distributed driving system of hub motor | |
CN108657174B (en) | Multi-axis distributed driving unmanned vehicle control method and system | |
CN113147735B (en) | Differential braking/driving coordination rollover prevention control system and control method thereof | |
CN114194178B (en) | Four-wheel steering four-wheel driving intelligent chassis stability control method | |
CN114834263A (en) | Coordination control method and device for steering and torque vector of active front wheel of electric automobile | |
CN113997927A (en) | Stability control method based on distributed driving electric automobile | |
CN112977413A (en) | Stability control method for distributed driving electric automobile |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PB01 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
GR01 | Patent grant |