CN109800955A - Coal seam bottom water bursting hazard assessment calculation method - Google Patents

Coal seam bottom water bursting hazard assessment calculation method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN109800955A
CN109800955A CN201811578399.6A CN201811578399A CN109800955A CN 109800955 A CN109800955 A CN 109800955A CN 201811578399 A CN201811578399 A CN 201811578399A CN 109800955 A CN109800955 A CN 109800955A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
evaluation
factor
fuzzy
index
coal seam
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
CN201811578399.6A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
曾朝辰
赵伟
郭之理
王浩民
沈冰
于泳
马振海
刘洲
冉德立
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Yongcheng Coal and Electricity Holding Group Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Yongcheng Coal and Electricity Holding Group Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Yongcheng Coal and Electricity Holding Group Co Ltd filed Critical Yongcheng Coal and Electricity Holding Group Co Ltd
Priority to CN201811578399.6A priority Critical patent/CN109800955A/en
Publication of CN109800955A publication Critical patent/CN109800955A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

The invention discloses a kind of coal seam bottom water bursting hazard assessment calculation methods, evaluation procedure is as follows: a, determining evaluation factor collection: choosing the influence factor of coal seam bottom water bursting, by the acquisition and analysis to gushing water sample data, influence factor set i.e. evaluation factor collection is established;B, the Comment gathers of Comprehensive Evaluation are determined, c, determine factor weight vector;D, it carries out single factor test fuzzy evaluation and calculates construction jdgement matrix;E, it carries out fuzzy composition and makes decisions: introducing a fuzzy subset on Comment gathers, claim decision set, this is Fuzzy Synthetical Decision Model, obtains evaluation result.The present invention has carried out objective analysis to the capability of influence for influencing coal seam bottom water bursting factor, and effectively filtering out influences significant impact factor, reduces interference of the not strong factor of capability of influence to evaluation result.

Description

Coal seam bottom water bursting hazard assessment calculation method
Technical field
The present invention relates to a kind of coal seam water inrush evaluation methods more particularly to a kind of coal seam bottom water bursting hazard assessment to calculate Method.
Background technique
Coal is the important basic energy resource in China, and coal resources in China very abundant, purposes is very extensive, to China The national economic development is of great significance.The pattern of coal dominance in primary energy production and consumption is not shaken yet. In consumption of coal, electric power, steel, building materials and chemical industry consumption coal account for 80% of consumption of coal or more.
However, more and more safety problems are also come thick and fast with the continuous improvement of coal production.As it can be seen that carrying out coal Layer Water Inrush method for evaluating hazard studies the coal resources threatened for liberating China by water, protection staff life security tool It is of great significance.
For many years, many scholars have conducted extensive research coal seam bottom water bursting hazard assessment.In China, water bursting coefficient Method is used till today always for 60 years from the upper world, but this method only accounts for hydraulic pressure and impermeable layer thickness, and has ignored other influences The effect of factor.Over nearly ten or twenty year, scholars are by fuzzy mathematics, analytic hierarchy process (AHP), neural network, GIS-Geographic Information System skill The methods of art, support vector machines introduce on Prediction of Water Jetting from Coal Bottom and hazard assessment, achieve many achievements.However, this A little methods have on to Water Inrush influence degree although it is contemplated that influence mode and feature of each factor in Water Inrush There are certain subjectivity and randomness, it is still not objective enough to calculate analysis, and does not account for each influence factor for evaluation The effect and influence of system.
There are many factor for influencing coal seam bottom water bursting, but role during gushing water of these factors is different, Some capability of influence may be very strong, and some then may be very faint.If all factors are all used to establish to comment with not making any distinction between Valence system not only will increase calculation amount and difficulty in computation, it is also possible to because the correlation between influence factor leads to the drop of computational accuracy It is low.On the other hand, when introducing the not strong factor of some capability of influence in appraisement system, interference can be generated to evaluation effect, caused The evaluation model of foundation is unstable.Therefore, influence factor how to be selected to become a particularly important problem.Meanwhile bottom plate is prominent Water is a nonlinear problem again, thus needs to solve with nonlinear method.Therefore it is badly in need of a kind of more scientific coal seam Water Inrush method for evaluating hazard.
Summary of the invention
The technical problems to be solved by the present invention are: it is a kind of more steady to provide in place of overcome the deficiencies in the prior art, More scientific, practical coal seam floor water-inrush risk evaluation method.
The technical solution adopted by the present invention are as follows: a kind of coal seam floor water-inrush risk evaluation method, evaluation procedure are as follows:
I, evaluation factor collection is determined:
According to each mining area many years experience with mining, the influence factor of coal seam bottom water bursting is chosen, by gushing water sample number According to acquisition and analysis, establish influence factor set i.e. evaluation factor collection;
II, the Comment gathers for determining Comprehensive Evaluation:
Comment gathers are the set that various indexs are made with possible outcome.
III, factor weight vector is determined:
In evaluation, weight is the measurement value of characterization factor relative importance size, by investigating each evaluation to the index The information content for including in systems is smaller.The difference of object index value and reference value, with the index after quantization, with other indexs It is radix that index value, which is with reference to sequence difference, finally obtains evaluation result and is asked according to column with the index value of index to compare sequence It obtains evaluation of result object and carries out ranking.
IV, it carries out single factor test fuzzy evaluation and calculates construction jdgement matrix:
Simple element evaluation is done to the single factor test in set of factors first, from factor to decision grade, that is, Comment gathers degree of membership, It thus obtains the simple element evaluation collection of each factor, then constructs a total evaluations matrix.The solution of degree of membership passes through Membership function is constructed, the method for the membership function of construction can be Statistical self similarity method, the method for undetermined coefficients, Multivariate Membership Function method Deng.
V, it carries out fuzzy composition and makes decisions:
A fuzzy subset on Comment gathers is introduced, decision set is claimed.Enabling it be equal to weight vectors * jdgement matrix, (* is calculation Subsymbol), this is Fuzzy Synthetical Decision Model, obtains evaluation result.
The solution have the advantages that: objective analysis has been carried out to the capability of influence for influencing coal seam bottom water bursting factor, Effectively filtering out influences significant impact factor, reduces interference of the not strong factor of capability of influence to evaluation result.According to The factor filtered out, by fuzzy theory again with combining traditional grey relation theory with norm concept, in existing gushing water sample On the basis of data, non-linear discriminating analysis model is established.Since the model is on the basis for counting a large amount of influence factor data The evaluation of upper progress calculates, thus more previous model is more steady, more scientific, practical.
Detailed description of the invention
Fig. 1 is evaluation procedure flow chart of the invention.
Specific embodiment
The present invention will be further described in detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings and specific embodiments.
1. determining evaluation factor collection:
Set of factors is to be set as U={ u to influence the various factors of evaluation object as a set composed by element1, u2..., un}.U is the n kind factor i.e. evaluation index for portraying evaluation object.
According to each mining area many years experience with mining, the influence factor of coal seam bottom water bursting is chosen, by gushing water sample number According to acquisition and analysis, establish influence factor set i.e. evaluation factor collection;
2. determining the Comment gathers of Comprehensive Evaluation:
Comment gathers are the set that various indexs are made with possible outcome, are set as V={ v1, v2, v3 ..., vn}.V is to portray The n kind resolution of each factor state in which is opinion rating, and n is comment number, is generally divided into 3~5 grades.
3. determining factor weight vector
In evaluation, weight is the measurement value of characterization factor relative importance size, by investigating each evaluation to the index The information content for including in systems is smaller.The difference of object index value and reference value, with the index after quantization, with other indexs It is radix that index value, which is with reference to sequence difference, finally obtains evaluation result and is asked according to column with the index value of index to compare sequence It obtains evaluation of result object and carries out ranking.
Standardization is carried out to achievement data first and sets m as evaluation object number, n is index number, yijFor i-th of evaluation pair J-th of index value of elephant, and remember ZijFor the index value after standardization.
Then reference sequences x is determined0h, calculate the absolute difference of each evaluation object and reference sequences.
Δih=| zih-x0h|
ΔihFor absolute difference, | zih| it is former sequence after standardization, | x0h| it is reference sequences.
Last parameter weight W
wjFor the weight of jth item, εjFor the difference of jth item.
4. carrying out single factor test fuzzy evaluation calculates construction jdgement matrix
Simple element evaluation is done to the single factor test in set of factors first, from factor to decision grade, that is, Comment gathers degree of membership, It thus obtains the simple element evaluation collection of each factor, then constructs a total evaluations matrix.The solution of degree of membership passes through Membership function is constructed, the method for the membership function of construction can be Statistical self similarity method, the method for undetermined coefficients, Multivariate Membership Function method Deng.
First to the single factor test U in set of factorsi(i=1,2,3 ..., n) does simple element evaluation, from factor UiTo decision grade VjDegree of membership be Rij, thus obtain the simple element evaluation collection of i-th of factor Ui: Ri=(Ri1, Ri2..., Rin).Such n The evaluation set of a factor just constructs a total evaluations matrix R.I.e. each is evaluated object and has determined obtains mould from U to V Paste relational matrix R.
5. carrying out fuzzy composition and making decisions
A fuzzy subset B on V is introduced, decision set, i.e. B=(b are claimed1, b2, b3..., bn).Enabling B=A*R, (* is calculation Subsymbol), this is Fuzzy Synthetical Decision Model.In order to keep the result of decision clear, using information principle of centrality, first by feasibility Degree demarcation interval simultaneously takes single section median to be used as set Ci=(c1, c2, c3..., cn), formula is concentrated by information:
Wherein biFor element in decision set, ciFor demarcation interval set element.
According to final score S, coal seam bottom water bursting risk degree can be calculated by compareing demarcation interval.
The above described is only a preferred embodiment of the present invention, be not intended to limit the present invention in any form, it is all It is any simple modification, equivalent change and modification to the above embodiments according to the technical essence of the invention, still falls within In the range of technical solution of the present invention.

Claims (1)

1. a kind of coal seam bottom water bursting hazard assessment calculation method, comprising the following steps:
A. evaluation factor collection is determined:
Set of factors is to be set as U={ u to influence the various factors of evaluation object as a set composed by element1, u2..., un, U is the n kind factor i.e. evaluation index for portraying evaluation object;
According to each mining area many years experience with mining, the influence factor of coal seam bottom water bursting is chosen, by gushing water sample data Acquisition and analysis, establish influence factor set i.e. evaluation factor collection;
B. the Comment gathers of Comprehensive Evaluation are determined:
Comment gathers are the set that various indexs are made with possible outcome, are set as V={ v1, v2, v3 ..., vn, V be portray it is each because The n kind resolution of plain state in which is opinion rating, and n is comment number, is generally divided into 3~5 grades;
C. factor weight vector is determined:
In evaluation, weight is the measurement value of characterization factor relative importance size, is being to the index by investigating each evaluation The information content for including in system is smaller, the difference of object index value and reference value, with the index after quantization, with the index of other indexs It is radix that value, which is with reference to sequence difference, finally obtains evaluation result and acquires knot with the index value of index to compare sequence according to column Fruit evaluation object carries out ranking;
Standardization is carried out to achievement data first and sets m as evaluation object number, n is index number, yijIt is the of i-th of evaluation object J index value, and remember ZijFor standardization after index value:
Then reference sequences x is determined0h, calculate the absolute difference of each evaluation object and reference sequences:
Δih=| zih-x0h|
ΔihFor absolute difference, | zih| it is former sequence after standardization, | x0h| it is reference sequences,
Last parameter weight W:
wjFor the weight of jth item, εjFor the difference of jth item,
D. it carries out single factor test fuzzy evaluation and calculates construction jdgement matrix:
Simple element evaluation is done to the single factor test in set of factors first, from factor to decision grade, that is, Comment gathers degree of membership, in this way It just obtains the simple element evaluation collection of each factor, then constructs a total evaluations matrix, the solution of degree of membership passes through construction The method of membership function, the membership function of construction uses Statistical self similarity method, the method for undetermined coefficients, Multivariate Membership Function method;
First to the single factor test U in set of factorsi(i=1,2,3 ..., n) does simple element evaluation, from factor UiTo decision grade Vj's Degree of membership is Rij, thus obtain i-th of factor UiSimple element evaluation collection: Ri=(Ri1, Ri2..., Rin), such n factor Evaluation set just construct a total evaluations matrix R, i.e., each is evaluated object and has determined obtains fuzzy relation from U to V Matrix R;
E. it carries out fuzzy composition and makes decisions:
A fuzzy subset B on V is introduced, decision set, i.e. B=(b are claimed1, b2, b3..., bn), enable B=A*R, wherein * is operator Symbol, this is Fuzzy Synthetical Decision Model, in order to keep the result of decision clear, using information principle of centrality, first by feasibility journey Degree demarcation interval simultaneously takes single section median to be used as set Ci=(c1, c2, c3..., cn), formula is concentrated by information:
Wherein biFor element in decision set, ciFor demarcation interval set element,
According to final score S, coal seam bottom water bursting risk degree can be calculated by compareing demarcation interval.
CN201811578399.6A 2018-12-24 2018-12-24 Coal seam bottom water bursting hazard assessment calculation method Pending CN109800955A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201811578399.6A CN109800955A (en) 2018-12-24 2018-12-24 Coal seam bottom water bursting hazard assessment calculation method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201811578399.6A CN109800955A (en) 2018-12-24 2018-12-24 Coal seam bottom water bursting hazard assessment calculation method

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN109800955A true CN109800955A (en) 2019-05-24

Family

ID=66557324

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201811578399.6A Pending CN109800955A (en) 2018-12-24 2018-12-24 Coal seam bottom water bursting hazard assessment calculation method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN109800955A (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN114087022A (en) * 2021-10-28 2022-02-25 山东科技大学 Coal seam floor variable parameter water inrush channel early warning system and water inrush danger judgment method

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2008165599A (en) * 2006-12-28 2008-07-17 National Institute Of Information & Communication Technology Rumor information extraction device and rumor information extraction method
CN107230031A (en) * 2017-05-27 2017-10-03 陕西师范大学 Eco industrial park Third Party Reverse Logistics system network platform
WO2018121035A1 (en) * 2016-12-29 2018-07-05 山东科技大学 Customized method for determining coal mining face floor water inrush risk level
CN109002978A (en) * 2018-07-05 2018-12-14 山东省城市供排水水质监测中心 A kind of coagulant efficiency evaluation method based on fuzzy synthesis mathematics

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2008165599A (en) * 2006-12-28 2008-07-17 National Institute Of Information & Communication Technology Rumor information extraction device and rumor information extraction method
WO2018121035A1 (en) * 2016-12-29 2018-07-05 山东科技大学 Customized method for determining coal mining face floor water inrush risk level
CN107230031A (en) * 2017-05-27 2017-10-03 陕西师范大学 Eco industrial park Third Party Reverse Logistics system network platform
CN109002978A (en) * 2018-07-05 2018-12-14 山东省城市供排水水质监测中心 A kind of coagulant efficiency evaluation method based on fuzzy synthesis mathematics

Non-Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
杨滨滨等: "近松散含水层下采煤安全性熵值模糊综合评判", 《煤田地质与勘探》 *
王心义: "基于熵权-模糊可变集理论的煤矿井突水水源识别", 《煤炭学报》 *
董国华等: "运用模糊综合评判法评价煤层底板突水危险性", 《煤炭科技》 *

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN114087022A (en) * 2021-10-28 2022-02-25 山东科技大学 Coal seam floor variable parameter water inrush channel early warning system and water inrush danger judgment method
CN114087022B (en) * 2021-10-28 2023-11-28 山东科技大学 Coal seam floor variable parameter water inrush channel early warning system and water inrush risk judging method

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN104778378B (en) A kind of oil gas field the analysis of affecting factors about production decline method
CN105510546B (en) A kind of biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) BOD intelligent detecting methods based on self-organizing Recurrent RBF Neural Networks
CN104794361B (en) A kind of water-drive pool development effectiveness integrated evaluating method
CN104018831B (en) A kind of fractured well reservoir evaluation methods
CN109133351A (en) Membrane bioreactor-MBR fouling membrane intelligent early-warning method
CN101957889B (en) Selective wear-based equipment optimal maintenance time prediction method
CN107025338A (en) A kind of sludge bulking fault identification method based on Recurrent RBF Neural Networks
CN106555788A (en) Application of the deep learning based on Fuzzy Processing in hydraulic equipment fault diagnosis
CN109726902B (en) Slope stability evaluation method
CN103530818A (en) Water supply pipe network modeling method based on BRB (belief-rule-base) system
CN108765004A (en) A method of user's electricity stealing is identified based on data mining
CN105278520A (en) Complex industrial process running state evaluation method and application based on T-KPRM
CN108647643A (en) A kind of packed tower liquid flooding state on-line identification method based on deep learning
CN110046812A (en) The integrated evaluating method of city safety development level
CN107065834A (en) The method for diagnosing faults of concentrator in hydrometallurgy process
CN106127388A (en) The energy efficiency evaluating method of high energy-consuming enterprises
CN105571645A (en) Automatic dam monitoring method
CN108536128A (en) A kind of machine learning fault diagnosis system of parameter optimization
CN106862284B (en) A kind of cold rolled sheet signal mode knowledge method for distinguishing
CN107506862A (en) A kind of online real-time estimate system and method for grinding particle size based on Internet of Things
CN109800955A (en) Coal seam bottom water bursting hazard assessment calculation method
CN105719065B (en) Complex oil reservoir reserve quality classification comprehensive evaluation method
CN109669017A (en) Refinery's distillation tower top based on deep learning cuts water concentration prediction technique
CN107689015A (en) A kind of improved power system bad data recognition method
CN106485326A (en) A kind of hardness detection method in ore reduction production process

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
RJ01 Rejection of invention patent application after publication

Application publication date: 20190524

RJ01 Rejection of invention patent application after publication