CN109753102B - Improved photovoltaic fuzzy MPPT control method - Google Patents

Improved photovoltaic fuzzy MPPT control method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN109753102B
CN109753102B CN201711075039.XA CN201711075039A CN109753102B CN 109753102 B CN109753102 B CN 109753102B CN 201711075039 A CN201711075039 A CN 201711075039A CN 109753102 B CN109753102 B CN 109753102B
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
fuzzy
power
mpp
mppt
photovoltaic
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
CN201711075039.XA
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN109753102A (en
Inventor
游国栋
严宇
苏虹霖
徐涛
王军
沈延新
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Tianjin University of Science and Technology
Original Assignee
Tianjin University of Science and Technology
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Tianjin University of Science and Technology filed Critical Tianjin University of Science and Technology
Priority to CN201711075039.XA priority Critical patent/CN109753102B/en
Publication of CN109753102A publication Critical patent/CN109753102A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN109753102B publication Critical patent/CN109753102B/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02EREDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
    • Y02E10/00Energy generation through renewable energy sources
    • Y02E10/50Photovoltaic [PV] energy
    • Y02E10/56Power conversion systems, e.g. maximum power point trackers

Landscapes

  • Control Of Electrical Variables (AREA)
  • Photovoltaic Devices (AREA)

Abstract

The invention relates to an improved photovoltaic fuzzy MPPT control method, which is mainly technically characterized by comprising the following steps: scanning, storing, disturbing and observing are adopted to obtain the optimal power. Under initial conditions or variable weather, the method can search and store the maximum power value of the photovoltaic system in a large range. The preset value represents an acceptable difference between the determined maximum power and the operating power as determined by the controller rules. If the difference between the determined maximum power and the operating power is greater than a preset value, the duty cycle is increased; otherwise, MPPT based on fuzzy logic is applied. In this manner, the algorithm may ensure that the MPPT does not get stuck in the local MPP and quickly reverts to the new global MPP. The invention combines the maximum power point tracking method based on fuzzy logic with scanning storage. The controller has quick convergence, can avoid the fluctuation of the working point near the MPP, greatly improves the control effect of the MPPT, and enhances the dynamic response of the system.

Description

Improved photovoltaic fuzzy MPPT control method
Technical Field
The invention relates to a method for tracking the maximum power of solar energy, in particular to an improved maximum power point tracking method controlled by photovoltaic fuzzy logic.
Background
With the rapid development of industry, the demand of human beings for energy is continuously increased, and the trend of the world has been to search for new energy to replace the conventional energy resources. Photovoltaic energy, one of the available alternative energy sources, is one of the most promising renewable energy sources. The photovoltaic energy source is clean and simple in design. At present, both household and industry have an optimistic attitude on photovoltaic power generation, and it is hoped that photovoltaic energy can be fully utilized, and the photovoltaic energy can be widely applied to various aspects of life and production of people. However, the high installation cost and the low photovoltaic efficiency are two main disadvantages of the photovoltaic system, and the low photovoltaic efficiency is mainly that the output characteristic has strong nonlinear characteristics, and the output current and the maximum output power of the solar panel can greatly change along with the difference of the light intensity and the ambient temperature.
The traditional algorithms comprise a fixed voltage method, a disturbance observation method, an admittance increment method, an optimal gradient method, a hysteresis comparison method, a neuron network control method, a fuzzy logic control method and the like. There are also some novel control strategies proposed and applied in practice in the academic world at home and abroad. The students of Pentao and Dingkun of river and sea university propose an improved global maximum power point control algorithm based on a disturbance observation method and an admittance incremental method, and the method has global improvement on the aspects of tracking rapidity and system stability. The Wenzand learner of Harbin's university of Physician uses the minimum quadratic multiplication to perform data fitting, and designs a three-point least square method combining fixed step length and variable step length to perform system tracking, so as to obtain the maximum output power. The Miyatake M scholars employ a direct search algorithm to search for the maximum power point, and to ensure that a global MPP is found, the initial point must be carefully selected, otherwise the controller may be trapped in a local MPP. To reduce the impact of local shadows, the Nguyen D scholars propose adaptive solar photovoltaic arrays, and control the fixed part connecting the solar adaptive library and the photovoltaic array switch matrix by using a model-based control algorithm. Likewise, the dynamic array reconstruction algorithm may improve the output of the photovoltaic system under local shadow conditions. The university of Velasco-quasdaa G inserts a controllable switch matrix between the photovoltaic power generation system and the central inverter to electrically reconnect the photovoltaic modules. In these methods, MPP can be obtained by using a conventional MPPT algorithm, but their power levels are complex and the cost is high. Therefore, research on an MPPT control method with low cost and high efficiency is required.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention aims to overcome the defects of the prior art and provide an improved photovoltaic fuzzy MPPT control method which is reasonable in design and has good steady-state and dynamic performance.
The technical problem to be solved by the invention is realized by adopting the following technical scheme:
an improved photovoltaic fuzzy MPPT control method is characterized by comprising the following steps:
step 1, the photovoltaic system needs to be sampled before obtaining the optimal MPP, so the system is initialized by utilizing the maximum duty ratio.
Step 2, scanning a P-U curve and storing the global MPP; a large perturbation is preset to increase the search range.
And 3, obtaining the global MPP through disturbance and observation.
And 4, fuzzifying the input quantity and the output quantity.
The input and output of the fuzzy logic controller are as follows:
ΔP=P(k)-P(k-1)
ΔI=I(k)-I(k-1)
ΔPM=PM(k)-P(k)
ΔD=D(k)-D(k-1)
wherein, the delta P and the delta I are respectively the change of the output power and the current of the photovoltaic array, and the delta PMGlobal MPP (P) for storageM) Δ D is the duty cycle change from the current power. Δ P and Δ I are divided into four fuzzy subsets: positive large (PB), Positive Small (PS), negative large (NB), and Negative Small (NS). Delta PMTwo fuzzy subsets are divided: PB and PS. Δ D is divided into six fuzzy subsets: PB, median (PM), PS, NB, Negative Median (NM), and NS. Therefore, the algorithm requires 32 control rules, which are based on the PO algorithm rules and are adjusted with reference power.
And 5, converting the fuzzy quantity obtained by the reasoning into a clear quantity.
These fuzzy combinations are deblurred using the Mamdani method with max-min. The formula is as follows:
Figure BSA0000153125140000021
where Δ D is the fuzzy control output, DiIs the center of the maximum-minimum range of the output membership functions.
The invention has the advantages and positive effects that:
1. unlike the conventional Perturbation and Observation (PO) method for tracking MPP to obtain the optimal operating power of the photovoltaic system, the improved pv fuzzy MPPT method adopts scanning, storage, perturbation and observation to obtain the optimal power. Under initial conditions or variable weather conditions, the method can search a large range to scan and store the maximum power value of the photovoltaic system. The preset value represents an acceptable difference between the determined maximum power and the operating power as determined by the controller rules. If the difference between the determined maximum power and the operating power is greater than a preset value, the duty cycle is increased; otherwise, MPPT based on fuzzy logic is applied. In this manner, the algorithm may ensure that the MPPT does not get stuck in the local MPP and quickly reverts to the new global MPP.
2. The improved photovoltaic fuzzy logic MPPT combines the MPPT based on fuzzy logic with a scanning storage system, so that the dynamic response of the system is improved; after the algorithm is applied, the working point is fixed near the MPP, and the control effect of the MPPT is greatly improved; even under variable weather conditions, the MPPT can scan and track the global MPP in a short time, and the controller has high convergence speed and high system tracking performance.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a modified photovoltaic fuzzy MPPT flow diagram and controller;
FIG. 2 is a graph of the shape of the membership function of the input and output and the fuzzy subset partition;
Detailed Description
The embodiments of the invention will be described in further detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings:
an improved photovoltaic fuzzy MPPT control method is different from a traditional Perturbation and Observation (PO) method for tracking MPP to obtain the optimal operating power of a photovoltaic system, and the improved photovoltaic fuzzy MPPT method adopts scanning, storage, perturbation and observation to obtain the optimal power. Under initial conditions or variable weather conditions, the method can search a large range to scan and store the maximum power value of the photovoltaic system. The preset value represents an acceptable difference between the determined maximum power and the operating power as determined by the controller rules. If the difference between the determined maximum power and the operating power is greater than a preset value, the duty cycle is increased; otherwise, MPPT based on fuzzy logic is applied. In this manner, the algorithm may ensure that the MPPT does not get stuck in the local MPP and quickly reverts to the new global MPP. FIG. 1a is a flow chart in which D is the duty cycle, PMTo global MPP, Δ PMIs a constant that identifies the allowable difference between the global MPP and the operating power point.
The algorithm employs three scanning and storage methods: the photovoltaic system needs to be sampled before obtaining the optimal MPP, so the system is initialized with the maximum duty cycle. The method comprises the steps of scanning a P-U curve to search and store the global MPP; the duty cycle is increased by a fixed step. Meanwhile, scanning a P-U curve and storing the global MPP; a large perturbation is preset to increase the search range. Unlike the two methods described above, this method is through perturbation and observation to obtain the global MPP. Through the three methods, the system can be ensured to find and store the global MPP, and the time for identifying the global MPP by the three methods is different. In addition, whenever global MPP is found, it must return to a minimum value as long as the duty cycle exceeds a maximum threshold.
The improved fuzzy logic based MPPT algorithm (fig. 1b), using a scan and store program, can quickly locate the global MPP. The input and output of the fuzzy logic controller are as follows:
ΔP=P(k)-P(k-1)
ΔI=I(k)-I(k-1)
ΔPM=PM(k)-P(k)
ΔD=D(k)-D(k-1) (1)
wherein, the delta P and the delta I are respectively the change of the output power and the current of the photovoltaic array, and the delta PMΔ D is the duty cycle change, which is the difference between the stored global mpp (pm) and the current power. Δ P and Δ I are divided into four fuzzy subsets: positive large (PB), Positive Small (PS), negative large (NB), and Negative Small (NS). Delta PMTwo fuzzy subsets are divided: PB and PS. Δ D is divided into six fuzzy subsets: PB, median (PM), PS, NB, Negative Median (NM), and NS. Therefore, the algorithm requires 32 control rules, which are based on the PO algorithm rules and are adjusted with reference power. These fuzzy combinations are operated on using the Mamdani method with max-min. The core algorithm during defuzzification is to convert the duty ratio of the fuzzy subset into a real number, and the formula is as follows:
Figure BSA0000153125140000031
where Δ D is the fuzzy control output, DiIs the center of the maximum-minimum range of the output membership functions. The shapes of the membership functions and fuzzy subset partitions of the inputs and outputs are shown in fig. 2.
It should be emphasized that the embodiments described herein are illustrative rather than restrictive, and thus the present invention is not limited to the embodiments described in the detailed description, but also includes other embodiments that can be derived from the technical solutions of the present invention by those skilled in the art.

Claims (1)

1. An improved photovoltaic fuzzy MPPT control method is characterized in that under an initial condition or a variable weather condition, the maximum power value of a photovoltaic system is searched and scanned in a large range and stored, and if the difference between the determined maximum power and the operation power is larger than a preset value, the duty ratio is increased; otherwise, applying MPPT based on fuzzy logic; the preset value represents an acceptable difference between the determined maximum power and the operating power determined by the controller rules; the method comprises the following steps:
step 1, a photovoltaic system needs to be sampled before obtaining the optimal MPP, so that the system is initialized by utilizing the maximum duty ratio;
step 2, scanning a P-U curve and storing the global MPP; increasing a duty ratio with a fixed step length, scanning a P-U curve at the same time, and storing the global MPP;
step 3, presetting a large disturbance to increase the search range, and obtaining the global MPP through disturbance and observation;
step 4, fuzzification of input quantity and output quantity;
wherein, the input and output of the fuzzy logic controller are as follows:
ΔP=P(k)-P(k-1)
ΔI=I(k)-I(k-1)
ΔPM=PM(k)-P(k)
ΔD=D(k)-D(k-1)
in the formula, Δ P and Δ I are respectively the output power of the photovoltaic arrayChange in current, Δ PMGlobal MPP (P) for storageM) From the difference in current power, Δ D is the duty cycle change, and Δ P and Δ I are divided into four fuzzy subsets: positive Big (PB), Positive Small (PS), Negative Big (NB) and Negative Small (NS), Δ PMTwo fuzzy subsets are divided: PB, PS, Δ D are divided into six fuzzy subsets: PB, median (PM), PS, NB, Negative Median (NM), and NS; therefore, the algorithm needs 32 control rules which are based on the PO algorithm rule and adjusted along with the reference power;
step 5, converting the fuzzy quantity obtained by the reasoning into a clear quantity;
wherein the deblurring operation is performed on these fuzzy combinations using the Mamdani method with the maximum-minimum, and the formula is as follows:
Figure FSB0000193339690000011
where Δ D is the fuzzy control output and Di is the center of the maximum-minimum range of the output membership function.
CN201711075039.XA 2017-11-01 2017-11-01 Improved photovoltaic fuzzy MPPT control method Active CN109753102B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201711075039.XA CN109753102B (en) 2017-11-01 2017-11-01 Improved photovoltaic fuzzy MPPT control method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201711075039.XA CN109753102B (en) 2017-11-01 2017-11-01 Improved photovoltaic fuzzy MPPT control method

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN109753102A CN109753102A (en) 2019-05-14
CN109753102B true CN109753102B (en) 2021-08-03

Family

ID=66400410

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201711075039.XA Active CN109753102B (en) 2017-11-01 2017-11-01 Improved photovoltaic fuzzy MPPT control method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN109753102B (en)

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN102163067A (en) * 2011-04-11 2011-08-24 武汉万鹏科技有限公司 Solar maximum power tracking method and solar charging device
CN103955253A (en) * 2014-05-05 2014-07-30 合肥工业大学 Power closed-loop scanning-based maximum power point tracking method for multiple peak values of photovoltaic array
CN103995560A (en) * 2014-05-26 2014-08-20 东南大学 Photovoltaic array multi-peak maximum power point tracking method

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN102799208A (en) * 2012-07-20 2012-11-28 黄克亚 Photovoltaic power generation maximum power point tracking fuzzy proportion integration differentiation (PID) control method
CN106950857A (en) * 2017-04-27 2017-07-14 南通大学 Photovoltaic cell MPPT emulation modes based on fuzzy logic control

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN102163067A (en) * 2011-04-11 2011-08-24 武汉万鹏科技有限公司 Solar maximum power tracking method and solar charging device
CN103955253A (en) * 2014-05-05 2014-07-30 合肥工业大学 Power closed-loop scanning-based maximum power point tracking method for multiple peak values of photovoltaic array
CN103995560A (en) * 2014-05-26 2014-08-20 东南大学 Photovoltaic array multi-peak maximum power point tracking method

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
组合模糊控制技术与扰动观察法提升光伏发电MPPT性能;黄克亚 等;《测控技术》;20120731;第31卷(第7期);第131页第3节-第133页第4节 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN109753102A (en) 2019-05-14

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Ahmed et al. Enhancement of MPPT controller in PV-BES system using incremental conductance along with hybrid crow-pattern search approach based ANFIS under different environmental conditions
Welch et al. Energy dispatch fuzzy controller for a grid-independent photovoltaic system
Javed et al. A comparative study of maximum power point tracking techniques for solar systems
Padmanabhan et al. Fuzzy logic based maximum power point tracker for a photovoltaic system
Balal et al. Optimized generated power of a solar PV system using an intelligent tracking technique
Zouirech et al. Application of various classical and intelligent MPPT tracking techniques for the production of energy through a photovoltaic system
Kacimi et al. A new combined method for tracking the global maximum power point of photovoltaic systems
Tahir et al. Analysis the Performance of Silicon Solar Cell Parameters with the Ambient Temperature using Fuzzy Logic
Kumar et al. Fuzzy logic based improved P&O MPPT technique for partial shading conditions
Taheri et al. Modified maximum power point tracking (MPPT) of grid-connected PV system under partial shading conditions
Kulaksız et al. Rapid control prototyping based on 32-Bit ARM Cortex-M3 microcontroller for photovoltaic MPPT algorithms
Liu et al. A MPPT algorithm based on PSO for PV array under partially shaded condition
CN109753102B (en) Improved photovoltaic fuzzy MPPT control method
Farzaneh et al. Application of improved salp swarm algorithm based on MPPT for PV systems under partial shading conditions
Mahanta et al. A review of maximum power point tracking algorithm for solar photovoltaic applications
Afghoul et al. Comparison Study between conventional and advanced MPPT based on fuzzy logic and ANFIS for standalone system
Boutaybi et al. Optimization of photovoltaic system using Mamdani and Takagi Sugeno MPPT controls
Ghatak et al. Comparative analysis of maximum power point tracking algorithms for standalone PV system under variable weather conditions
Rajarajan et al. MPPT based on modified firefly algorithm
Anil Fuzzy logic based maximum power point tracker for a PV System
Sagonda et al. Comparison of three techniques for maximum power point tracking of solar PV
Kaur et al. Modeling of MPPT-Based Solar Eco-System Using Fuzzy Logic Controller
Li et al. A comparison study on the performance of different MPPT control strategies in DC microgrids with photovoltaic systems
CN109343649A (en) A kind of by stages is from optimizing MPPT solar power generation control method
Yuhan et al. Analysis of the different maximum power point tracking strategies in a load-connected photovoltaic system

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant