CN109657922B - Marine ecology suitability evaluation assembly device - Google Patents
Marine ecology suitability evaluation assembly device Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN109657922B CN109657922B CN201811406658.7A CN201811406658A CN109657922B CN 109657922 B CN109657922 B CN 109657922B CN 201811406658 A CN201811406658 A CN 201811406658A CN 109657922 B CN109657922 B CN 109657922B
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- data
- evaluation
- marine
- weight
- suitability
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 148
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 8
- 238000000342 Monte Carlo simulation Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 6
- 238000003825 pressing Methods 0.000 claims description 16
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 claims description 11
- 238000012851 eutrophication Methods 0.000 claims description 9
- 230000004913 activation Effects 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 241000251468 Actinopterygii Species 0.000 claims description 4
- 241001474374 Blennius Species 0.000 claims description 4
- 241000238557 Decapoda Species 0.000 claims description 4
- 235000015170 shellfish Nutrition 0.000 claims description 4
- 230000003213 activating effect Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000009469 supplementation Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 abstract description 6
- 230000006872 improvement Effects 0.000 abstract description 3
- 238000005457 optimization Methods 0.000 abstract description 3
- 238000004088 simulation Methods 0.000 description 7
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000009825 accumulation Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000007613 environmental effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000002699 waste material Substances 0.000 description 3
- 241001465754 Metazoa Species 0.000 description 2
- 230000006399 behavior Effects 0.000 description 2
- 229930002868 chlorophyll a Natural products 0.000 description 2
- ATNHDLDRLWWWCB-AENOIHSZSA-M chlorophyll a Chemical compound C1([C@@H](C(=O)OC)C(=O)C2=C3C)=C2N2C3=CC(C(CC)=C3C)=[N+]4C3=CC3=C(C=C)C(C)=C5N3[Mg-2]42[N+]2=C1[C@@H](CCC(=O)OC\C=C(/C)CCC[C@H](C)CCC[C@H](C)CCCC(C)C)[C@H](C)C2=C5 ATNHDLDRLWWWCB-AENOIHSZSA-M 0.000 description 2
- 238000013100 final test Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000036961 partial effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000002829 reductive effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 2
- OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N Carbon Chemical group [C] OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000004075 alteration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009395 breeding Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001488 breeding effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229910052799 carbon Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000003086 colorant Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000011157 data evaluation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002349 favourable effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229910052500 inorganic mineral Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 238000011835 investigation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009191 jumping Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000670 limiting effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000014759 maintenance of location Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000011707 mineral Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001681 protective effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000035484 reaction time Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002441 reversible effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 241000894007 species Species 0.000 description 1
- 238000006467 substitution reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000013589 supplement Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012876 topography Methods 0.000 description 1
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
- G06Q10/06393—Score-carding, benchmarking or key performance indicator [KPI] analysis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Systems or methods specially adapted for specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/10—Services
- G06Q50/26—Government or public services
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Educational Administration (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Primary Health Care (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
The invention discloses a marine ecological suitability evaluation component device, which comprises a terminal main body and a terminal screen (1), wherein the terminal main body comprises at least one memory, and the memory is used for storing marine ecological suitability evaluation data; a processor; the marine ecological suitability evaluation terminal screen can display data in the marine ecological suitability evaluation memory, and is provided with a pressure sensor; after the terminal main body or the middle terminal screen obtains an evaluation input signal, the processor judges whether the marine ecological suitability evaluation data and/or the weight data are missing or not; according to the judgment of the missing situation, carrying out assignment in a threshold value on the missing numerical value by adopting a Monte Carlo method, and then carrying out fluctuation calculation of a scoring result; or directly calculate the scoring result. Therefore, the invention has the advantages of weight threshold optimization, tolerance of missing data and improvement of administrative intervention effect.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to a special terminal device for environmental evaluation, in particular to a marine ecological suitability evaluation component device.
Background
The concept of ecological suitability is derived from land resource utilization and planning, and is widely applied to the fields of agriculture, animal and plant habitat suitability analysis, protected area site selection, landscape planning, cultivation area division, environmental impact evaluation and the like, and becomes an important tool for space planning. Currently, the mainstream land research defines it as: the suitability or limitation degree of the regional ecological system for a certain sustainable use is determined by natural attributes such as meteorological hydrology, geological structure, topography, land resources, mineral resources, animals and plants and the like, and human characteristics such as landscapes, cultures and the like. The ecological suitability evaluation refers to the evaluation and space regional distribution of resources and environmental quality under the condition of conforming to ecology rules by analyzing natural elements and social economic attributes of a specific ecological system according to the scale uniqueness, anti-interference performance, biodiversity, space effect and the like of a planning object or an evaluation unit, guiding regional ecological division and coordinating the relationship between human social and economic activities and natural ecological processes. Currently, the above statistics are usually performed as paper surface statistics.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention aims to provide a marine ecological suitability evaluation component device with weight threshold optimization, tolerance of missing data and improvement of administrative intervention effect.
The technical scheme adopted for solving the technical problems is as follows: a marine ecological suitability evaluation component device comprises a terminal main body and a terminal screen (1),
the marine ecology suitability evaluation terminal main body includes,
at least one memory for storing marine ecosuitability evaluation data;
a processor;
the marine ecological suitability evaluation terminal screen can display data in the marine ecological suitability evaluation memory, and is provided with a pressure sensor; the marine ecology suitability evaluation processor can receive a signal for pressing a marine ecology suitability evaluation terminal screen and activate a standby mode; in this mode state, the slide or pressing operation command can be received in the vicinity of the outer edge of the area to be pressed for marine ecological suitability evaluation; and wherein an actuating physical variable (P, F, S) representing a marine ecosuitability evaluation press is detected; activating the marine suitability evaluation keeping waiting mode if the gradient of the actuation physical variable (P, F, S) exceeds an activation threshold (G);
the outer edge of the area pressed by the marine ecological suitability evaluation receives a marine ecological suitability evaluation sliding or pressing operation instruction and then carries out addition or subtraction operation on evaluation data;
after the marine ecological suitability evaluation terminal main body or the middle terminal screen obtains an evaluation input signal, the marine ecological suitability evaluation processor judges whether marine ecological suitability evaluation data and/or weight data are missing or not;
if the value is missing, assigning the value within the threshold by adopting a Monte Carlo method, and then measuring and calculating the fluctuation of the scoring result;
if no, the scoring result is directly calculated.
The terminal of the invention can be a mobile phone or a tablet personal computer. When the gradient of the physical variable (P, F, S) due to the heavy pressing of the user exceeds the activation threshold (G), the waiting mode is activated to wait for the user to make the adjustment of the score of the subjective evaluation data. The evaluation data comprises objective evaluation data or/and subjective evaluation data.
In order to optimize the technical scheme, the measures adopted further comprise:
the fluctuation of the marine ecological suitability evaluation and scoring result is calculated by carrying out Monte Carlo assignment for preset times on marine ecological suitability evaluation data and/or weight data and calculating the scoring result MS n Then according to the calculation of the MS n Coefficient of variation of the collection. Based on the coefficient of variation, it is possible to determine whether or not the supplementation of the missing data is practically meaningful.
MS n Omega is the comprehensive evaluation value of the object to be evaluated i Weights (weights) for each evaluation index, X i And n is the number of the evaluation indexes.
Marine ecological suitability evaluation data includes marine ecological environment suitability data, marine natural resource suitability data and marine socioeconomic suitability data;
marine ecological suitability evaluation marine ecological environment suitability data includes: biodiversity index, eutrophication index, natural shoreline conservation rate, marine risk distribution index, ecologically sensitive area and important protected objects, ecologically disturbance degree, net primary productivity;
the marine natural resource suitability data for evaluating marine ecological suitability includes: the length of the available shoreline, the area of the available beach and the scenic spot level coefficient are utilized;
marine ecological suitability evaluation marine socioeconomic suitability data includes: the increment value of the marine economy industry, population density, accessibility of important nodes, sea area utilization area proportion, sea reclamation intensity value, fish, shrimp and crab culture yield, seaweed and shellfish culture yield and port throughput. Due to the nature of the relevant data itself, some of the data are relatively stable and some need to be updated in time. On different monitoring stations, timeliness of data updating cannot be guaranteed, and therefore simulation assignment and multiple tests are needed to evaluate the result value. Under the condition that the final test evaluation result value obtained by carrying out simulation assignment on part of data is stable, the emergency data acquisition and calibration are considered unnecessary, and unnecessary material and personnel waste is reduced.
The marine ecological suitability evaluation data also contains weight thresholds of the individual evaluation indexes; the marine ecology suitability evaluation weight is changed along with the input of a marine ecology suitability evaluation data acquisition monitoring server or a database server or a marine ecology suitability evaluation terminal. The traditional common way to determine weights is questionnaire, with a large hysteresis. And because the convenience of issuing the questionnaire once is extremely low, the real-time updating of the weight becomes obvious when the policy or the acceptance evaluation index changes. The marine ecological suitability evaluation data comprises weight thresholds of all the individual evaluation index data besides the weight of the individual evaluation index data, wherein the thresholds are calculated and optimized, the range is limited for Monte Carlo assignment, and otherwise, estimation assignment cannot be carried out. When the operator modifies the weight of one evaluation index in the evaluation working state, the device averages the original historical weight y and variance sigma, and when the input new weight deviates from the average weight y+/-3 sigma, the weight only participates in the calculation of the evaluation value. When the input new weight is within the weight average number y+/-3 sigma, the data of the new weight is stored in a memory, and the new weight data is added in the historical weight. Through repeated evolution of the operation, the weight threshold value is more accurate, and the tolerance is improved.
Because the invention adopts the method that after the terminal main body or the middle terminal screen obtains an evaluation input signal, the processor judges whether the marine ecological suitability evaluation data and/or the weight data are missing or not; according to the judgment of the missing situation, carrying out assignment in a threshold value on the missing numerical value by adopting a Monte Carlo method, and then carrying out fluctuation calculation of a scoring result; or directly calculate the scoring result. Therefore, the invention has the advantages of weight threshold optimization, tolerance of missing data and improvement of administrative intervention effect.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of a module structure according to an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram illustrating the usage status of an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of a full curve of an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 4 is a schematic view of a partial curve of an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 5 is a schematic diagram of a station distribution in an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 6 is a schematic diagram of a beach usable in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
Detailed Description
The invention is described in further detail below in connection with the following examples.
Reference numerals illustrate: screen 1, pressed area 2, virtual dividing line 21.
Example 1: referring to fig. 1 to 6, the marine ecology suitability evaluation module device includes a terminal body and a terminal screen 1,
the marine ecology suitability evaluation terminal main body includes,
at least one memory for storing marine ecosuitability evaluation data;
a processor;
the marine ecology suitability evaluation terminal screen 1 can display data in a marine ecology suitability evaluation memory, and a pressure sensor is arranged on the marine ecology suitability evaluation terminal screen 1; the marine ecology suitability evaluation processor can receive a signal for pressing the marine ecology suitability evaluation terminal screen 1 and activate a hold waiting mode; in this mode state, the vicinity of the outer edge of the region 2 pressed by marine ecological suitability evaluation can receive a sliding or pressing operation instruction; and wherein an actuating physical variable (P, F, S) representing a marine ecosuitability evaluation press is detected; activating the marine suitability evaluation maintaining waiting mode if the gradient of the marine suitability evaluation physical variable (P, F, S) exceeds an activation threshold (G);
the outer edge of the region 2 pressed by the marine ecological suitability evaluation receives a marine ecological suitability evaluation sliding or pressing operation instruction and then carries out addition or subtraction operation on evaluation data;
after the marine ecological suitability evaluation terminal main body or the middle terminal screen 1 obtains an evaluation input signal, the marine ecological suitability evaluation processor judges whether marine ecological suitability evaluation data and/or weight data are missing;
if the value is missing, assigning the value within the threshold by adopting a Monte Carlo method, and then measuring and calculating the fluctuation of the scoring result;
if no, the scoring result is directly calculated.
The terminal of the invention can be a mobile phone or a tablet personal computer. When the gradient of the physical variable (P, F, S) due to the heavy pressing of the user exceeds the activation threshold (G), the waiting mode is activated to wait for the user to make the adjustment of the score of the subjective evaluation data. The evaluation data comprises objective evaluation data or/and subjective evaluation data. The evaluation input signal may be transmitted from a server or may be manually input to the terminal.
The fluctuation of the marine ecological suitability evaluation and scoring result is calculated by carrying out Monte Carlo assignment for preset times on marine ecological suitability evaluation data and/or weight data and calculating the scoring result MS n Then according to the calculation of the MS n Coefficient of variation of the collection. Based on the coefficient of variation, it is possible to determine whether or not the supplementation of the missing data is practically meaningful.
MS n Omega is the comprehensive evaluation value of the object to be evaluated i Weights (weights) for each evaluation index, X i And n is the number of the evaluation indexes.
Marine ecological suitability evaluation data includes marine ecological environment suitability data, marine natural resource suitability data and marine socioeconomic suitability data;
marine ecological suitability evaluation marine ecological environment suitability data includes: biodiversity index, eutrophication index, natural shoreline conservation rate, marine risk distribution index, ecologically sensitive area and important protected objects, ecologically disturbance degree, net primary productivity;
the marine natural resource suitability data for evaluating marine ecological suitability includes: the length of the available shoreline, the area of the available beach and the scenic spot level coefficient are utilized;
marine ecological suitability evaluation marine socioeconomic suitability data includes: the increment value of the marine economy industry, population density, accessibility of important nodes, sea area utilization area proportion, sea reclamation intensity value, fish, shrimp and crab culture yield, seaweed and shellfish culture yield and port throughput. Due to the nature of the relevant data itself, some of the data are relatively stable and some need to be updated in time. On different monitoring stations, timeliness of data updating cannot be guaranteed, and therefore simulation assignment and multiple tests are needed to evaluate the result value. Under the condition that the final test evaluation result value obtained by carrying out simulation assignment on part of data is stable, the emergency data acquisition and calibration are considered unnecessary, and unnecessary material and personnel waste is reduced.
The marine ecological suitability evaluation data also contains weight thresholds of the individual evaluation indexes; the marine ecology suitability evaluation weight is changed along with the input of a marine ecology suitability evaluation data acquisition monitoring server or a database server or a marine ecology suitability evaluation terminal. The traditional common way to determine weights is questionnaire, with a large hysteresis. And because the convenience of issuing the questionnaire once is extremely low, the real-time updating of the weight becomes obvious when the policy or the acceptance evaluation index changes. The marine ecological suitability evaluation data comprises weight thresholds of all the individual evaluation index data besides the weight of the individual evaluation index data, wherein the thresholds are calculated and optimized, the range is limited for Monte Carlo assignment, and otherwise, estimation assignment cannot be carried out. When the operator modifies the weight of one evaluation index in the evaluation working state, the device averages the original historical weight y and variance sigma, and when the input new weight deviates from the average weight y+/-3 sigma, the weight only participates in the calculation of the evaluation value. When the input new weight is within the weight average number y+/-3 sigma, the data of the new weight is stored in a memory, and the new weight data is added in the historical weight. Through repeated evolution of the operation, the weight threshold value is more accurate, and the tolerance is improved.
When the standby mode is kept activated, the state of the standby mode is prompted by colors or graphics near the pressed area 2 within a preset time interval; when the hold waiting mode is activated, the pressed area 2 is pressed again, and the hold waiting mode is released. The color of the region 2 with the score pressed is obviously displayed in a reverse rotation mode, a wire frame is thickened and the like, so that a user is assisted to see the distance between the score sliding operation point and the region 2 with the original press clearly, and the accumulated and accumulated digital jumping speed is accelerated or slowed down. The defect that misoperation is easily caused by the traditional addition and subtraction operation mode under the condition that the symbol is too small or the shaking environment is avoided.
The time interval is 0ms to 3000ms. The user's wish can be fed back immediately when the user's effective operation is obtained, and a gap can be set as required to give the user a reaction time.
The outer edge of the pressed region 2 is divided into at least,
an add operation area for receiving a slide or press of an add operation;
and a subtracting operation area for receiving a sliding or pressing of the subtracting operation. Preferably, a cancel area may be provided above the pressed area 2 to receive a cancel operation by the user and slide or press in the area to exit the hold waiting mode.
P is the actuation pressure of the user's finger or equivalent. Equivalents include, but are not limited to, capacitive point styluses, and the like. F is the actuation force of the user's finger or equivalent. The contact area of the user's finger or equivalent with the terminal screen 1. The processor may be a single processor chip, such as an MCU chip, or may be a circuit module configured to perform processing of multiple components (such as digital circuits and analog circuits). The memory includes: a usb disk, a removable hard disk, a Read Only Memory (ROM), a random access Memory (RAM, random Access Memory), a magnetic disk, or an optical disk, or other various media capable of storing program codes and exchanging data with a processor.
The following examples of adjustments to score subjective assessment data are given by the user: if the default value of the marine ecology suitability evaluation data is preset to 60 minutes, the user slides or clicks the finger to the left lower area of the original pressing area, corresponding to the deduction operation, and correspondingly if the user slides or clicks the finger to the right lower area of the original pressing area, the sliding position is further away from the original pressing area, the accumulation or accumulation number of each time is correspondingly increased, and the interval between the accumulation or accumulation can be set to 0.1 to 1 second. The above-described left-plus-right-minus operation determination preset is based on a general habit, or can be reversed by manual setting. The user slides or clicks the finger to the upper region of the original pressing region, and cancels the activation state of the hold waiting mode. The detected physical variables can be monitored in an alternative manner because the three are related, and a change in one physical variable reflects the corresponding operation behavior. The present invention is further explained by way of examples. Subjective evaluation data is input through the terminal screen 1;
preferably, the objective evaluation data is obtained from the data source server by wireless means and finally displayed on the terminal screen 1.
Recording in an instant manner generally reduces interference from other artifacts due to the need for fair and objective assessment. The objective evaluation data can be studied according to the network platform and transmitted to the mobile terminal, so that the method is accurate and convenient, and the waste of paper is avoided.
Example 2: the main body of the embodiment is similar to the embodiment 1, and further large-scale data acquisition and processing operation are performed through an online system for evaluating the suitability of marine ecology so as to improve the work synergy. The component device of the invention is used as a data acquisition and investigation terminal to participate in the system. The system comprises a database server, a WEB server connected with the database server, and also comprises,
a data acquisition monitoring server exchanging information with the database server;
the marine ecological suitability evaluation component device can receive marine ecological suitability evaluation data input and transmit marine ecological suitability evaluation data to the data acquisition monitoring server;
when partial data of the marine ecology suitability evaluation data is missing, the data acquisition monitoring server and/or the marine ecology suitability evaluation terminal can simulate and assign values to the missing information by using a Monte Carlo method. By adopting the design, the evaluation data are transmitted to the data acquisition monitoring server after being received, and the data are finally stored on the database server through the switch. The database server displays the rating data on the output component, i.e. the display screen. When the WEB server receives the public inquiry access requirement, acquiring a related evaluation result of the database server and outputting the result. Because the monitored original data can not be obtained in real time, the evaluation is simulated by adopting a simulation assignment mode, and whether the urgent data acquisition task is necessary or not is judged. The database server is used for storing the data acquired by the data acquisition monitoring server; and the WEB server is connected with the database server and is used for responding to the WEB access. The WEB server can express the data of the database server as a legend similar to that of fig. 6. Of course, the device of the invention can access the WEB server.
Biodiversity index:
wherein S represents Shannon-Wiener diversity index; n represents the number of biological species at a measurement station; pi represents the ratio of the number of ith biological individuals to the total number of individuals.
Specifically, COD, DIN, PO is selected by adopting a formula of Jingzhong about sea area eutrophication 4 3- Three indexes, meterThe eutrophication index of the marine ecological system is calculated, and when EI is more than or equal to 1, the eutrophication index is the eutrophication, and the higher the EI value is, the higher the eutrophication degree is.
P＝rv(Chla)×Q×D；
Wherein: p represents the daily primary productivity (mgC/m) 3 D), Q represents an assimilation coefficient (in terms of C) in units of carbon [ mg.cndot.1 (mgChla.h) -assimilated per mg of chlorophyll a per hour]Such as 3.7; d represents sunlight time, and the spring time can be 12 hours; rv (Chla) represents the concentration of chlorophyll-a in water in milligrams per cubic meter (mg/m) 3 )。
Since the research on the suitability of marine ecology has just started, a set of relatively complete theoretical system and evaluation method have not been formed yet. Considering that the factors influencing the ecological system of the sea area are numerous, natural factors are involved, social economy is involved, ecological factors to be considered are numerous, a multi-index comprehensive evaluation method is to be adopted for evaluating the ecological suitability of the project, and accordingly comprehensive evaluation is carried out on various information of each tissue level of the marine ecological system on the premise of selecting groups of different tissue levels and considering different scales. On the basis of establishing an area ecological suitability evaluation index system, the current state values of the ecological suitability degree in the areas (villages, towns, villages and the like and taking grids as evaluation units) are obtained through weighted superposition by spatial layer expression of each ecological factor, threshold limits of development and protection are set, and ecological functional areas (important protection areas, general protection areas, moderate development areas and optimized development areas) under different value areas are defined in a grading mode. The terminal transmits the evaluation data to the data acquisition monitoring server after receiving the evaluation data, and finally the data are stored on the database server through the switch. The database server displays the rating data on the output component, i.e. the display screen. When the WEB server receives the public inquiry access requirement, acquiring a related evaluation result of the database server and outputting the result. Because the monitored original data can not be obtained in real time, the incomplete data evaluation is simulated for multiple times by adopting a simulation assignment mode, and whether the urgent data acquisition task is necessary or not is judged. If the simulation result is unstable, the influence of the missing data on the sea area evaluation is larger, and the related mechanism should be arranged to acquire temporary data, so that the effectiveness of the prediction result is improved, and the effect of administrative intervention is improved. To determine the coefficient of variation, the Monte Carlo procedure described above is cycled a limited number of times, for example 10 to 100 ten thousand times. The coefficient of variation of the output score value (i.e., the evaluation value, which is common to the above expression in the art) is calculated. And judging that the variation coefficient is larger than 15%, sending out a signal needing to temporarily acquire data (i.e. needing to temporarily acquire), or sending out a signal needing to temporarily acquire data (i.e. needing to temporarily acquire). At this time, the staff can decide whether to need administrative intervention and corresponding data supplement according to the corresponding output result. When the marine ecology suitability evaluation data and the weights are complete in data, the grading result is directly calculated, and at the moment, a worker can judge whether administrative intervention is needed or not by taking the grading result as a decision condition so as to improve the ecology suitability condition of the sea area.
The threshold range and the optimal value of each single data weight contained in the marine ecology suitability evaluation data are as follows:
a biodiversity index of 0.074-0.12, preferably 0.01; eutrophication index 0.034-0.05, preferably 0.046; natural shoreline retention of 0.038-0.06, preferably 0.057; marine risk profile index 0.028-0.04, preferably 0.036; ecologically sensitive areas and important protective objects 0.072-0.11, preferably 0.097; ecological interference degree is 0.015-0.21, preferably 0.17; net primary productivity is 0.104-0.11, preferably 0.109;
a shoreline length of 0.079-0.098, preferably 0.091, can be utilized; the beach area can be utilized from 0.091 to 0.104, preferably 0.101; scenic spot level coefficients 0.085-0.092, preferably 0.089;
the increment value of the marine economy industry is 0.022-0.03, preferably 0.029; population density is 0.016-0.02, preferably 0.019; accessibility of important nodes (town centers, transportation hubs, large fishing ports) is 0.025-0.04, preferably 0.037; sea area utilization area ratio is 0.036-0.06, preferably 0.056; the value of the sea-filling strength is 0.042-0.07, preferably 0.066; the fish, shrimp and crab breeding yield is 0.017-0.03,0.029; seaweed and shellfish culture yield is 0.017-0.05,0.045; port throughput is 0.03-0.033,0.031. The threshold value of each index of the element layer is a preset maximum and minimum value of the past year, and is updated in real time. Compared with the prior art, the numerical range of the invention has higher accuracy of the evaluation result, is more favorable for intervening the administrative on the production behavior, and comprises not only the end numerical values at the two ends, but also all continuous or discontinuous point values in the numerical range.
While the invention has been described in connection with the preferred embodiments, it is not intended to be limiting, but it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes, substitutions and alterations of the subject matter set forth herein can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention, and it is intended that the scope of the invention shall be defined from the appended claims.
Claims (3)
1. Marine ecology suitability evaluation subassembly device, including terminal main part and terminal screen (1), characterized by:
the terminal body may include a plurality of terminal bodies,
at least one memory for storing marine ecosuitability evaluation data;
a processor;
the terminal screen can display the data in the memory, and the terminal screen (1) is provided with a pressure sensor; the processor can receive the signal for pressing the terminal screen (1) and activate a hold waiting mode; in this mode state, the vicinity of the outer edge of the pressed region (2) can receive a slide or press operation instruction; and wherein an actuation physical variable (P, F, S) representative of said pressing is detected; activating said hold waiting mode if the gradient of said physical variable (P, F, S) exceeds an activation threshold (G); the outer edge of the pressed area (2) receives the sliding or pressing operation instruction and then carries out addition or subtraction operation on the evaluation data;
after the terminal main body or the terminal screen (1) obtains an evaluation input signal, the processor judges whether the marine ecological suitability evaluation data and/or the weight data are missing or not;
if the value is missing, assigning the value within the threshold by adopting a Monte Carlo method, and then measuring and calculating the fluctuation of the scoring result;
if no loss exists, directly calculating a scoring result;
the fluctuation calculation of the grading result is to carry out Monte Carlo assignment on the marine ecology suitability evaluation data and/or the weight data for preset times and calculate a grading result MSn, and then judge whether the supplementation of the missing data has practical significance according to the variation coefficient of the MSn set;
MSn is a comprehensive evaluation value of the object to be evaluated,ω i for the weight of each evaluation index, x i The evaluation value of a single index is obtained, and n is the number of the evaluation indexes;
when the operator modifies the weight of one evaluation index in the evaluation working state, the device averages the original historical weight y and variance sigma, and when the input new weight deviates from the average weight y+/-3 sigma, the weight only participates in the calculation of the evaluation value; when the input new weight is within the weight average number y+/-3 sigma, the data of the new weight is stored in a memory, and the new weight data is added in the historical weight.
2. The marine ecology suitability evaluation assembly apparatus of claim 1, wherein:
the marine ecological suitability evaluation data comprise marine ecological environment suitability data, marine natural resource suitability data and marine socioeconomic suitability data;
the marine ecological environment suitability data comprises: biodiversity index, eutrophication index, natural shoreline conservation rate, marine risk distribution index, ecologically sensitive area and important protected objects, ecologically disturbance degree, net primary productivity;
the ocean natural resource suitability data comprises: the length of the available shoreline, the area of the available beach and the scenic spot level coefficient are utilized;
the marine socioeconomic fitness data comprises: the increment value of the marine economy industry, population density, accessibility of important nodes, sea area utilization area proportion, sea reclamation intensity value, fish, shrimp and crab culture yield, seaweed and shellfish culture yield and port throughput.
3. The marine ecology suitability evaluation assembly apparatus of claim 1, wherein: the marine ecological suitability evaluation data also contains weight thresholds of various individual evaluation indexes; the weight changes along with the input of the data acquisition monitoring server or the database server or the marine ecology suitability evaluation terminal.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201811406658.7A CN109657922B (en) | 2018-11-20 | 2018-11-20 | Marine ecology suitability evaluation assembly device |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201811406658.7A CN109657922B (en) | 2018-11-20 | 2018-11-20 | Marine ecology suitability evaluation assembly device |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN109657922A CN109657922A (en) | 2019-04-19 |
| CN109657922B true CN109657922B (en) | 2024-03-01 |
Family
ID=66112259
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201811406658.7A Active CN109657922B (en) | 2018-11-20 | 2018-11-20 | Marine ecology suitability evaluation assembly device |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN109657922B (en) |
Families Citing this family (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN110321523A (en) * | 2019-05-21 | 2019-10-11 | 自然资源部第二海洋研究所 | Marine functional zoning appraisal procedure |
| CN110412244B (en) * | 2019-07-22 | 2022-07-29 | 湖南文理学院 | Eutrophic beach sediment habitat restoration information processing system and method |
| CN111445347A (en) * | 2020-05-26 | 2020-07-24 | 中国水产科学研究院黄海水产研究所 | Decision support system for sea area aquaculture space planning |
| CN115392692A (en) * | 2022-08-23 | 2022-11-25 | 自然资源部第一海洋研究所 | Offshore ecological suitability evaluation method for human activity interference |
Citations (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN106484976A (en) * | 2016-09-28 | 2017-03-08 | 西安交通大学 | Red tide monitoring early warning system |
| CN107544733A (en) * | 2017-09-07 | 2018-01-05 | 广州视源电子科技股份有限公司 | Menu managing method, device, multimedia touch control device and storage medium |
| CN107679703A (en) * | 2017-09-08 | 2018-02-09 | 天津大学 | A kind of coastal ecological safety evaluation method |
| CN108287611A (en) * | 2018-04-24 | 2018-07-17 | 努比亚技术有限公司 | Screen touch-control response method, terminal and computer storage media |
-
2018
- 2018-11-20 CN CN201811406658.7A patent/CN109657922B/en active Active
Patent Citations (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN106484976A (en) * | 2016-09-28 | 2017-03-08 | 西安交通大学 | Red tide monitoring early warning system |
| CN107544733A (en) * | 2017-09-07 | 2018-01-05 | 广州视源电子科技股份有限公司 | Menu managing method, device, multimedia touch control device and storage medium |
| CN107679703A (en) * | 2017-09-08 | 2018-02-09 | 天津大学 | A kind of coastal ecological safety evaluation method |
| CN108287611A (en) * | 2018-04-24 | 2018-07-17 | 努比亚技术有限公司 | Screen touch-control response method, terminal and computer storage media |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN109657922A (en) | 2019-04-19 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN109657922B (en) | Marine ecology suitability evaluation assembly device | |
| Gebler et al. | Integrating river hydromorphology and water quality into ecological status modelling by artificial neural networks | |
| Stevenson et al. | Use of algae in environmental assessments | |
| Allen et al. | Error quantification of a high-resolution coupled hydrodynamic-ecosystem coastal-ocean model: Part 2. Chlorophyll-a, nutrients and SPM | |
| Seidl et al. | Climate change vulnerability of sustainable forest management in the Eastern Alps | |
| Kohyama | Size-structured multi-species model of rain forest trees | |
| Wylie et al. | Adaptive data-driven models for estimating carbon fluxes in the Northern Great Plains | |
| CN109784779B (en) | Financial risk prediction method, device and storage medium | |
| CN109583701A (en) | Online marine ecology suitability evaluation methods and dedicated system device | |
| Borics et al. | The role of phytoplankton diversity metrics in shallow lake and river quality assessment | |
| Carter et al. | Quantitative palynology informing conservation ecology in the Bohemian/Bavarian forests of Central Europe | |
| CN112903606B (en) | Mangrove forest ecological restoration force assessment method based on unmanned aerial vehicle hyperspectrum | |
| Evenhuis et al. | Modelling coral calcification accounting for the impacts of coral bleaching and ocean acidification | |
| Kruse | Ecosystem health indicators | |
| Mutshinda et al. | Phytoplankton traits from long-term oceanographic time-series | |
| Satake et al. | Drought and cool temperature cue general flowering synergistically in the aseasonal tropical forests of Southeast Asia | |
| Zhang et al. | Relationship between the geographical environment and the forest carbon sink capacity in China based on an individual-tree growth-rate model | |
| Fornaroli et al. | Quantile regression analysis as a predictive tool for lake macroinvertebrate biodiversity | |
| Evans et al. | Range size and niche breadth as predictors of climate-induced habitat change in Epipactis (Orchidaceae) | |
| Wang et al. | Effects of abiotic factors on ecosystem health of Taihu Lake, China based on eco-exergy theory | |
| Lewis et al. | Validation of a hydrodynamic-ecosystem model simulation with time-series data collected in the western English Channel | |
| CN115034425A (en) | Dynamic simulation and scheduling method and device for coupling water quantity-water quality-aquatic organism integrated community | |
| Hardman-Mountford et al. | Diagnostic monitoring of a changing environment: an alternative UK perspective | |
| Mao et al. | Developing composite indicators for ecological water quality assessment based on network interactions and expert judgment | |
| Skarbøvik et al. | Catchment effects of a future Nordic bioeconomy: From land use to water resources |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| CB02 | Change of applicant information | ||
| CB02 | Change of applicant information |
Address after: 310000 No. 36 Baoluo North Road, Xihu District, Hangzhou City, Zhejiang Province Applicant after: SECOND INSTITUTE OF OCEANOGRAPHY, MNR Address before: 310012 No. 36 Baolu North Road, Xihu District, Hangzhou City, Zhejiang Province Applicant before: THE SECOND INSTITUTE OF OCEANOGRAPHY, SOA |
|
| GR01 | Patent grant | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant |