CN109472017B

CN109472017B - Method and device for obtaining relevant information of text court deeds of referee to be generated

Info

Publication number: CN109472017B
Application number: CN201710805071.2A
Authority: CN
Inventors: 舒怡; 周冰洁
Original assignee: Beijing Gridsum Technology Co Ltd
Current assignee: Beijing Gridsum Technology Co Ltd
Priority date: 2017-09-08
Filing date: 2017-09-08
Publication date: 2022-09-20
Anticipated expiration: 2037-09-08
Also published as: CN109472017A

Abstract

The invention provides a method and a device for acquiring relevant information of a text court of a referee to be generated, after acquiring the court trial record and at least one referee document with the same or similar contents as the cases of the court trial record, determining each dispute focus of the court trial record, and from the sections considered by the court of the referee document, determining and outputting text information which is matched with each dispute focus of the court trial record and is used for assisting in obtaining the sections of the court deems of the official documents to be generated of the court trial record, therefore, the court officer can directly refer to the output text information and the case situation of the court trial record to obtain the court recognized section of the court trial record to be generated of the referee document, and compared with the prior art that the referee document and the general template which can be referred to are determined from the pushed general template of the referee document to be generated and the referee document, the generation efficiency of the court recognized section of the court trial record to be generated of the referee document is improved.

Description

Method and device for obtaining relevant information of text court deeds of referee to be generated

Technical Field

The invention relates to the technical field of information processing, in particular to a method and a device for obtaining relevant information of a to-be-generated official document book court deeming segment.

Background

Along with the construction and the improvement of the law society in China, the requirement of China on judicial judgment is higher and higher, and meanwhile, the high requirement on the generation efficiency of the referee documents is provided, so that the referee documents of basic cases and typical cases under each type of case can be summarized by a judge in advance, and a universal template of the referee documents of each type of case is provided.

When other judges process the court trial record of a certain type of case, the general template of the official document to be generated of the case of the type and at least one official document of the case of the type (such as the official document of the basic case and/or the official document of the typical case) can be pushed, and the information of the court trial record is filled in the pushed general template of the official document to be generated by the judge with reference to the pushed official document by the judge, so that the official document of the court trial record of the case of the type is obtained.

However, since the manner of pushing the universal template and the official document of the official document is too broad, for example, there are a plurality of universal templates for one type of official document, and the types of official documents to be pushed are different from each other, when the official document of the court trial record of one type of official document is processed by the judge, it is necessary to determine the available universal template and the available official document from the universal template and the official document of the pushed official document, thereby reducing the efficiency of generating the official document of the court trial record.

Disclosure of Invention

In view of the above problems, the present invention has been made to provide a method and an apparatus for obtaining information related to the court recognized sections of a official document to be generated, which overcome or at least partially solve the above problems, so as to improve the generation efficiency of the court recognized sections of the official document to be generated by a court trial record, and the technical solution is as follows:

the invention provides a method for obtaining relevant information of a text court of a referee to be generated, which comprises the following steps:

acquiring a court trial record and at least one referee document which has the same structure and similar content with the case of the court trial record;

determining each dispute focus of the court trial record, wherein the dispute focus is a point which is regarded as disputed by original reports and reported reports in cases corresponding to the court trial record;

determining text information matched with each dispute focus of the court trial record and used for assisting in obtaining the court trial sections of the court trial record to be generated of the official document from the court deems of the official document, wherein the court deems are part of the legal explanation of the official in the official document;

and outputting text information which is matched with each dispute focus of the court trial record and is used for assisting in obtaining the sections of the court deems of the official documents to be generated of the court trial record.

Preferably, the determining the dispute focuses of the court trial record comprises: extracting keywords from a preset part of the court trial record;

determining a preset keyword set matched with the extracted keywords;

and determining a dispute focus corresponding to the preset keyword set as a dispute focus of the court trial record.

Preferably, the text information includes at least: at least one referee rule matched with each dispute focus applied in the court deem section of the referee document;

the method further comprises the following steps: for each dispute focus, determining a referee rule most relevant to the dispute focus from at least one referee rule matched with the dispute focus, wherein the referee rule most relevant to the dispute focus is the referee rule most probably applied to the dispute focus in the court deeming section of the court to generate the referee document of the court trial record.

Preferably, the determining the referee rule most relevant to each dispute focus from the at least one referee rule matched with each dispute focus comprises: for each dispute focus: and counting the application probability of each referee rule matched with the dispute focus in the obtained referee document, and determining the referee rule most relevant to the dispute focus according to the application probability of each referee rule.

Preferably, the determining the referee rule most relevant to each dispute focus from the at least one referee rule matched with each dispute focus comprises: and under the condition that the number of the dispute focuses of the court trial record is multiple, arranging the dispute focuses according to the preset sequence priority of the dispute focuses, and sequentially determining the most relevant judgment rule of the dispute focuses according to the arranged sequence.

Preferably, the outputting of the text information of the court recognized section of the to-be-generated referee document matched with each dispute focus of the court trial record for assisting in obtaining the court trial record comprises: and outputting text information which is matched with the dispute focuses of the court trial record and is used for assisting in obtaining the court thought section of the referee document to be generated of the court trial record according to the preset sequence priority of the dispute focuses.

The invention also provides a device for obtaining the information related to the sections considered by the court of official documents to be generated, which comprises the following steps:

the court trial record acquiring unit is used for acquiring a court trial record and at least one referee document which has the same file composition and similar content with the court trial record;

the determination unit is used for determining each dispute focus of the court trial record and determining text information which is matched with each dispute focus of the court trial record and is used for assisting in obtaining the court thought section of the court trial record to be generated of the court trial record from the court thought sections of the court trial document, wherein the dispute focus is a point of disputes in cases corresponding to the court trial record which are considered by original reports and reports, and the court thought sections are parts of the law interpretation theory of judges in the court trial document;

and the output unit is used for outputting text information which is matched with each dispute focus of the court trial record and is used for assisting in obtaining the sections of the court deems of the official documents to be generated of the court trial record.

Preferably, the determining unit determines each dispute focus of the court trial record includes: extracting keywords from a preset part of the court trial record, determining a preset keyword set matched with the extracted keywords, and determining a dispute focus corresponding to the preset keyword set as the dispute focus of the court trial record;

or

The text information at least includes: at least one referee rule matched with each dispute focus applied in the court deem section of the referee document;

the determining unit is further configured to determine, for each dispute focus, a referee rule most relevant to the dispute focus from at least one referee rule matched with the dispute focus, where the referee rule most relevant to the dispute focus is a referee rule most likely to be used by the dispute focus in a section regarded by the court of the referee document to be generated in the court record.

Preferably, the determining unit determines, from the at least one referee rule matched with each dispute focus, the referee rule most relevant to each dispute focus, including: for each dispute focus: and counting the application probability of each referee rule matched with the dispute focus in the obtained referee document, and determining the referee rule most relevant to the dispute focus according to the application probability of each referee rule.

Preferably, the determining unit determines, from the at least one referee rule matched with each dispute focus, the referee rule most relevant to each dispute focus, including: and under the condition that the number of the dispute focuses of the court trial record is multiple, arranging the dispute focuses according to the preset sequence priority of the dispute focuses, and sequentially determining the judgment rule most relevant to the dispute focuses according to the arranged sequence.

Preferably, the output unit is configured to output, according to the preset order priority of each dispute focus, text information that is matched with each dispute focus of the court trial record and is used to assist in obtaining the section considered by the court of the referee document to be generated of the court trial record.

The invention also provides a storage medium, which stores a program that, when executed by a processor, implements the above method for obtaining the relevant information of the local court of official documents to be generated.

The invention also provides a processor for running a program, wherein the program executes the method for obtaining the information related to the sections considered by the court of official documents to be generated during running.

By means of the technical scheme, after the court trial record and at least one referee document which is the same as and similar to the case of the court trial record in content are obtained, each dispute focus of the court trial record is determined, and the text information which is matched with each dispute focus of the court trial record and is used for assisting in obtaining the court recognized section of the referee document to be generated of the court trial record is determined and output from the court recognized sections of the referee document, so that a judge can directly refer to the output text information and the case of the court trial record to obtain the court recognized sections of the referee document to be generated of the court trial record, and compared with the prior art, the generation efficiency of the court recognized sections of the referee document to be generated of the court trial record is improved by determining the referee universal template and the referee document from the pushed universal template and the referee document to be generated.

The foregoing description is only an overview of the technical solutions of the present invention, and the embodiments of the present invention are described below in order to make the technical means of the present invention more clearly understood and to make the above and other objects, features, and advantages of the present invention more clearly understandable.

Drawings

Various other advantages and benefits will become apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art upon reading the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments. The drawings are only for purposes of illustrating the preferred embodiments and are not to be construed as limiting the invention. Also, like reference numerals are used to refer to like parts throughout the drawings. In the drawings:

fig. 1 illustrates a flowchart of a method for obtaining information related to the sections considered by the court of official document to be generated according to an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure;

FIG. 2 illustrates another flow chart of a method for obtaining information related to the sections considered by the court of official documents to be generated according to an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure;

fig. 3 shows a schematic structural diagram of an apparatus for obtaining information related to segments considered by a court of official documents to be generated according to an exemplary embodiment of the disclosure.

Detailed Description

Exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure will be described in more detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings. While exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure are shown in the drawings, it should be understood that the present disclosure may be embodied in various forms and should not be limited by the embodiments set forth herein. Rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete, and will fully convey the scope of the disclosure to those skilled in the art.

Referring to fig. 1, a flowchart of a method for obtaining information related to court recognized sections of a referee document to be generated according to an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure is shown, which is used for determining, from court recognized sections of referee documents with the same and similar contents as a court story of a court trial record, text information of court recognized sections of the referee document to be generated, which are matched with dispute focuses of the court trial record, so as to assist in obtaining the court recognized sections of the referee document to be generated, and thus improve the generation efficiency of the court recognized sections of the referee document to be generated, where the court recognized sections are part of the interpretation of the referee document by a judge. Specifically, the method for obtaining the relevant information of the sections considered by the court of official documents to be generated shown in fig. 1 may include the following steps:

101: and acquiring a court trial record and at least one referee document which has the same structure and similar content with the case of the court trial record.

It can be understood that: the court trial record is a court trial record of a certain title according to which the referee document is to be generated, and in this exemplary embodiment, the court trial record or a court trial record input by a judge may be automatically obtained from a court trial record table, where the court trial record table stores at least one type of court trial records, and related information assisting in automatically obtaining the court trial record may also be stored in the court trial record table, where the related information includes, but is not limited to, storage time of the court trial record and a case importance degree corresponding to the court trial record, and according to the two pieces of information, a court trial record may be automatically obtained from the court trial record table, for example, a court trial record with storage time earlier than that of other court trial records and/or a court trial record with a case importance degree greater than that of other court trial records is obtained, and the storage time is used for indicating time written into the court trial record table or is used for indicating time for generating the court trial The time of the record, the case importance degree corresponding to the court trial record can be determined according to the type of the case, for example, the case importance degree of the typical (i.e. important) case is greater than that of the basic (i.e. simple) case.

For the officials document to be captured, it needs to satisfy two requirements: one point is that the case group is the same as the case group of the court trial record, namely the case group and the case group of the court trial record correspond to the same type of case group, if the case group type of the court trial record is infringement trademark dispute, the acquired judgment document also relates to the aspect of the infringement trademark dispute, and the other point is that the contents are similar, namely the contents stated by the judgment document are similar to the contents recorded by the court trial record.

In the exemplary embodiment, a referee document with similar content can be selected from a plurality of referee documents from the same table as the court trial record by adopting, but not limited to, full text comparison and important paragraph comparison, and the process is as follows:

the case pair consists of the same every referee document as the case of the court trial record: comparing the full text of the referee document with the full text of the court trial record to obtain full text similarity, comparing important paragraphs (such as sections considered by the court) of the referee document with the court trial record to obtain important paragraph similarity, weighting and summing the full text similarity and the important paragraph similarity of the referee document to obtain the similarity of the referee document and the court trial record, and selecting the referee document with the content similar to the court trial record according to the similarity of each referee document and the court trial record, for example, the selected referee document with the content similar to the court trial record is: the similarity between the court trial record and the referee document is greater than the similarity between the rest referee document and the court trial record.

The referee documents of the typical cases are selected because the typical cases are cases with typicality issued by the highest personnel courts or local high-level courts and have reference significance to the cases with the same type, so that the referee documents of the typical cases have higher quality than the referee documents of the basic cases, and the referee documents of the typical cases are adopted to form the preset document library in the exemplary embodiment. And the preset document library may include a referee document of one type of case or a referee document including a plurality of types of cases, to which the present exemplary embodiment is not limited. Under the condition of the official documents comprising a plurality of types of case slogans, the preset document library stores the official documents in the form of the official documents and the case slogans corresponding to the official documents.

102: and determining each dispute focus of the court trial record, wherein the dispute focus is the point of the cases corresponding to the court trial record which are considered as disputes by the original report and the reported report.

In the present exemplary embodiment, one possible way to determine the focus of disputes is to: and determining the dispute focus manually marked in the court trial record, such as marking out the dispute focus in the court trial record by a judge according to the disputes of the original report and the reported parties in the case trial process.

In the present exemplary embodiment, another possible way to determine the respective dispute foci is: extracting keywords from a preset part of the court trial record, determining a preset keyword set matched with the extracted keywords, and determining a dispute focus corresponding to the preset keyword set as a dispute focus of the court trial record. The preset keyword set is a set of keywords (which may be preset by a judge) preset according to a dispute focus, and a relationship between the keywords in the preset keyword set is preset, for example, the relationship between the keywords may be one of or and the two relationships, where "or" means that the same dispute focus can be matched by any one keyword in the preset keyword set, and "means that a dispute focus is matched by at least two keywords in the preset keyword set.

For example, the preset keyword set for dispute focus how property loss is calculated may be "death | adoptive | discrete | merge", where "|" indicates that the relationship between the keywords in the preset keyword set is: or, any one of the four keywords can be matched with the dispute focus 'how to calculate property loss' through death, succession, separation and combination; the preset keyword set for the dispute focus of how the responsibility is shared with the responsible person may be "responsible person + internal sharing | responsibility size", where "+" indicates that the relationship between the keywords in the preset keyword set is: and, how the responsibility of the responsible person is taken can be matched, for example, by the responsible person and the internal sharing, or by the responsible person and the size of the responsibility.

The preset portion is a portion of the court trial record where there is a focus of dispute, such as three portions of the original complaint request, the answered and the court survey portion, and the portion of the court trial record from which the keyword is extracted is not limited in the exemplary embodiment.

The points to be explained here are: the dispute focus corresponding to the preset keyword set is a dispute focus after processing dispute focuses in the plurality of referees, for example, the dispute focuses in the plurality of referees are standardized, the standardized processing includes, but is not limited to, merging the dispute focuses with consistent content but different expressions, so that the dispute focuses are merged into one dispute focus, and the dispute focus corresponding to the preset keyword set is a standard dispute focus through standardized processing of the dispute focuses. The focus of disputes is that expressions differ because each judge's idiom is not used and different words may be used when expressing a problem. Such as: whether infringement is formed and whether infringement behavior is the same dispute focus for which standardized processing is required.

103: and determining text information of the court recognized section of the referee document to be generated, which is matched with each dispute focus of the court trial record and is used for assisting in obtaining the court recognized section of the court trial record, from the court recognized section of the referee document.

It can be understood that: as known from the official documents of various types, the section is considered by the institute after the examined section of the official document and before the official main text, and the section considered by the institute begins with the character of 'thought by the institute', so that the section considered by the institute can be automatically determined according to the setting of the position of the section considered by the institute and the character of beginning of the section considered by the institute.

And by analysis of the sections deemed by the court of the official documents for each type of case: the text information of the sections considered by the court to be generated for assisting in obtaining the court trial record of the official document matched with each dispute focus of the court trial record comprises the following text information: official rules, applicable laws and case sources, which are the most important point in the court of official document to consider as the paragraph, so the text information determined in this exemplary embodiment includes at least: at least one referee rule matched with each dispute focus is applied in the court of the referee document, such as all referee rules matched with each dispute focus.

104: and outputting text information which is matched with each dispute focus of the court trial record and is used for assisting in obtaining the sections of the court deems of the official documents to be generated of the court trial record.

In this exemplary embodiment, each dispute focus has a different preset order priority, where the preset order priority is used to indicate an arrangement order of each dispute focus in the section deemed by the court, for example, a higher dispute focus of the preset order priority is arranged earlier in the section deemed by the court, so that the dispute focuses can be arranged according to the preset order priority of each dispute focus, and the text information of the section deemed by the court to be generated for assisting in obtaining the court trial record can be output, where the text information matches with each dispute focus of the court trial record. Specifically, text information matched with dispute focuses with high priority in the preset sequence is output preferentially.

The predetermined sequence priority can be determined according to practical application, such as the rule that the court of the official document considers the law interpretation in the paragraph. For example, for a case of trademark right infringement dispute, the law of law interpretation in the section considered by the court of the official document is: the method comprises the steps of firstly determining whether an original report is a trademark person, then determining whether an infringement behavior is implemented by the original report, and finally solving the responsibility problems of how to compensate and the like, so that when text information is output, text information matched with the original report and whether the trademark person is implemented by the original report can be output preferentially, text information matched with the infringement behavior is output again, and finally text information matched with the responsibility problems of how to compensate and the like is output.

Referring to fig. 2, another flowchart of a method for obtaining the information related to the sections considered by the court of official document to be generated according to an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure is shown, and may include the following steps:

201: and acquiring a court trial record and at least one referee document which has the same structure and similar content with the case of the court trial record.

202: and determining each dispute focus of the court trial record, wherein the dispute focus is the point of the cases corresponding to the court trial record which are considered as disputes by the original report and the reported report.

203: and determining at least one referee rule which is matched with each dispute focus of the court trial record and is used for assisting in obtaining the court considered section of the court trial record to be generated of the referee document from the court considered sections of the referee document. The referee rule is an expression form of text information matched with each dispute focus of the court trial record and used for assisting in obtaining the sections of the court deems of the court trial record to be generated.

For steps 201 to 203 described above: please refer to the detailed description of step 101 to step 103 in the embodiment shown in fig. 1, and the detailed description of the present exemplary embodiment is omitted here.

204: and determining the referee rule most relevant to each dispute focus from at least one referee rule matched with each dispute focus, wherein the referee rule most relevant to the dispute focus is the referee rule most probably applied to the dispute focus in the court deems section of the referee document recorded in the court trial.

It can be understood that: for a referee document, a corresponding dispute focus corresponds to a referee rule, one or more applicable laws, and a case source, and in the exemplary embodiment, the dispute focus is processed, such as standardized, so that the dispute focus matches at least one referee rule. The present exemplary embodiment may also determine the most relevant referee rule from the matched at least one referee rule.

One possible way to determine the referee rule most relevant to each dispute focus includes: for each dispute focus: and counting the application probability of each referee rule matched with the dispute focus in the obtained referee document, and determining the referee rule most relevant to the dispute focus according to the application probability of each referee rule.

The operation probability is the probability of applying the referee rule to the referee document, so the statistical operation probability is the operation probability of the referee rule because the referee rule is standardized, and the section regarded by the hospital of the referee document is described by the content similar to the referee rule, so the statistical operation probability of the referee rule is needed. For any referee document, the corresponding dispute focus of the referee document is known, so that the referee rule applied by the referee document can be found according to the preset corresponding relation between the dispute focus and the referee rule, and further for each dispute focus: and acquiring the application times of each referee rule matched with the dispute focus in the acquired referee document, and acquiring the application probability of the referee rule in the acquired referee document according to the application times of each referee rule matched with the dispute focus in the acquired referee document.

And when the operation probability is counted, the obtained referee document may be a certain number of referee documents, such as all referee documents with the same content as the court trial record, a preset number of referee documents, or a preset proportion of referee documents, where the preset number and the preset proportion may be determined according to the actual application, and the specific value is not limited in this exemplary embodiment.

Correspondingly, one feasible way of determining the referee rule most relevant to the dispute focus according to the application probability of each referee rule comprises the following steps: determining the referee rule whose application probability satisfies the preset condition as the referee rule most related to the dispute focus, wherein the referee rule whose application probability satisfies the preset condition may be, but is not limited to, the following referee rules:

such as a referee rule with an application probability greater than that of other referee rules; or the judgment rules are sorted from large to small according to the application probability of the judgment rules, and the judgment rules with the preset number are sorted in the front; or a judgment rule with a probability greater than a preset threshold is applied, and the preset number and the preset threshold may be determined according to practical applications, and the specific value is not limited in the exemplary embodiment.

The points to be explained here are: and under the condition that the number of the dispute focuses in the court trial record is multiple, arranging the dispute focuses according to the preset sequence priority of the dispute focuses, and sequentially determining the judgment rule most relevant to the dispute focuses according to the arranged sequence. The predetermined sequence priority can be determined according to practical application, such as the rule that the court of the official document considers the law interpretation in the paragraph. For example, for a case of trademark right infringement dispute, the law of law interpretation in the section considered by the court of the official document is: firstly, determining whether an original report is a trademark person or not, then determining whether an infringement behavior is implemented or not, and finally, solving the responsibility problems of how to compensate and the like, arranging the dispute focuses in the three aspects according to the rules, and then sequentially determining the most relevant judgment rules of the dispute focuses according to the arranged sequence.

205: and outputting at least one referee rule which is matched with each dispute focus of the court trial record and is used for assisting in obtaining the court deeming section of the referee document to be generated of the court trial record.

In the exemplary embodiment, when outputting the referee rule, at least one referee rule matching each dispute focus of the court trial record and used for assisting in obtaining the court recognized section of the referee document to be generated of the court trial record may also be output according to the preset order priority of each dispute focus. And for each dispute focus matched at least one referee rule: the most relevant referee rule matching the dispute focus is output, and the other referee rules matching the dispute focus are used as the replacement rules of the most relevant referee rules matching the dispute focus, so that when the most relevant referee rules matching the dispute focus are ignored, the replacement rules of the most relevant referee rules (i.e. the other referee rules matching the dispute focus) are output.

For example, the most relevant referee rule matching the dispute focus is displayed, and the other referee rules matching the dispute focus are stored in the storage space as replacement rules of the most relevant referee rules matching the dispute focus.

The text information matched with each dispute focus of the court trial record further comprises: under the condition of being suitable for the laws and the case sources, the applicable laws and the case sources corresponding to the referee rules can be output besides the referee rules, the applicable laws and the case sources corresponding to the referee rules most relevant to each dispute focus can also be directly displayed, the applicable laws and the case sources corresponding to other referee rules are stored in a storage space, and under the condition of displaying other referee rules, the applicable laws and the case sources corresponding to other referee rules are displayed.

By the technical scheme, for at least one referee rule matched with each dispute focus, the most relevant referee rule of each dispute focus can be determined from at least one referee rule matched with each dispute focus, the most relevant referee rule of each dispute focus and other referee rules in all referee rules of each dispute focus are output, and then the most relevant referee rule of each dispute focus can be directly displayed, so that a judge can quickly acquire the most relevant referee rule of each dispute focus.

The points to be explained here are: in the above method embodiment, each keyword in the preset keyword set and the dispute focus corresponding to the preset keyword set may be manually preconfigured, for example, each keyword in the preset keyword set and the dispute focus corresponding to the preset keyword set (the dispute focus after standardized processing of the existing dispute focus) are manually preconfigured. And after manual configuration, each keyword in the preset keyword set and a dispute focus corresponding to the preset keyword set can be detected by a method for obtaining relevant information of the sections considered by the official document institute to be generated, wherein the detection process is as follows:

and acquiring a plurality of court trial records which are the same as the record of the court trial records.

The extraction of the matching words from the preset portion of each of the plurality of court trial records, wherein the preset portion is a portion of the court trial records in which a dispute focus may exist, such as three portions of the original complaint request, the answered debt, and the court investigation portion, is not limited in the present exemplary embodiment as to which portion of the court trial records the matching words are extracted.

If the extracted matching words are not matched with the keywords in the preset keyword set, the preset keyword set and the dispute focus corresponding to the preset keyword set do not meet the requirement of subsequently obtaining relevant information of the sections of the official document court to be generated, and prompt information is output under the condition, wherein the prompt information is used for indicating the preset keyword set and the dispute focus corresponding to the preset keyword set to be reconfigured so as to inform that the preset keyword set and the dispute focus corresponding to the preset keyword set need to be updated manually. If the extracted matching words are matched with the keywords in the preset keyword set, the preset keyword set and the dispute focus corresponding to the preset keyword set are shown to meet the requirement of subsequently obtaining relevant information of the sections considered by the court of official document to be generated, and the preset keyword set and the dispute focus corresponding to the preset keyword set are reserved under the condition.

Corresponding to the method embodiment, the embodiment of the present invention further provides a device for obtaining information related to the court recognized segments of the referee document to be generated, which is used for determining, from the court recognized segments of the referee document which are identical to the case of the court trial record and similar in content, text information which is matched with each dispute focus of the court trial record and is used for assisting in obtaining the court recognized segments of the referee document to be generated of the court trial record, so as to improve the generation efficiency of the court recognized segments of the referee document to be generated. The schematic structural diagram of the apparatus for obtaining information related to the segments considered by the court of official documents to be generated is shown in fig. 3, and may include: an acquisition unit 11, a determination unit 12, and an output unit 13.

The obtaining unit 11 is configured to obtain a court trial record and at least one referee document with the same file and similar content as the court trial record.

That is, the obtained official document needs to satisfy two requirements: one point is that the case group is the same as the case group of the court trial record, namely the case group and the case group correspond to the same type of case group, if the case group type of the court trial record is infringement trademark dispute, the obtained referee document also relates to the aspect of the infringement trademark dispute, and the other point is that the contents are similar, namely the contents stated by the referee document are similar to the contents recorded by the court trial record. For the manner of acquiring the court trial record and the referee document by the acquiring unit 11, reference may be made to the relevant description in the method embodiment, and details of this exemplary embodiment will not be described again.

The determining unit 12 is configured to determine each dispute focus of the court trial record, and to determine, from the sections considered by the home of the referee document, text information of the sections considered by the home of the referee document to be generated, which is matched with each dispute focus of the court trial record and is used for assisting in obtaining the sections considered by the home of the referee document to be generated, wherein the dispute focus is a point of being considered as disputes by the original notice and the notice in the case corresponding to the court trial record, and the sections considered by the home of the referee document are part of the legal explanation theory in the referee document.

In the present exemplary embodiment, one possible way for the determination unit 12 to determine the respective dispute foci is: and (4) determining the dispute focus manually marked in the court trial record, such as marking the dispute focus in the court trial record according to the parts of the original report and disputes of both parties in the case trial process by a judge.

In the present exemplary embodiment, another possible way for the determination unit 12 to determine the dispute focus points is to: extracting keywords from a preset part of the court trial record, determining a preset keyword set matched with the extracted keywords, and determining a dispute focus corresponding to the preset keyword set as the dispute focus of the court trial record. The preset keyword set and the manner of obtaining the dispute focus corresponding to the preset keyword set may refer to the related description in the method embodiment, and details of this exemplary embodiment are not described again.

And by analysis of the sections deemed by the court of the official documents for each type of case: the text information of the sections considered by the court to be generated for assisting in obtaining the court trial record of the official document matched with each dispute focus of the court trial record comprises the following text information: referee rules, applicable laws and case sources, which are the most important point in the court of referee documents, and thus the text information determined in this exemplary embodiment includes at least: at least one referee rule matched with each dispute focus is applied in the court of the referee document, such as all referee rules matched with each dispute focus.

And the output unit 13 is used for outputting text information which is matched with each dispute focus of the court trial record and is used for assisting in obtaining the sections considered by the court of the official documents to be generated of the court trial record.

In the present exemplary embodiment, each dispute focus has a different preset order priority, and the preset order priority is used to indicate the importance degree of each dispute focus, for example, the higher the preset order priority is, the higher the importance degree is, so that the output unit 13 may output the text information of the home opinion segment of the generated referee document for assisting in obtaining the court trial record, which is matched with each dispute focus of the court trial record, to each dispute focus according to the preset order priority of each dispute focus. Specifically, the text information with the higher priority in the preset order and matched with the dispute focus is preferentially output.

The predetermined sequence priority can be determined according to practical applications, such as rules of law interpretation in the court-thought section of the official document. For instance, for the case of trade mark right dispute, the law of law interpretation in the section considered by the court of the official document is: the output unit 13 can output text information matching the dispute focus "whether the original report is the ticket holder" and then output text information matching the dispute focus "whether the infringement behavior is implemented" and finally output text information matching the dispute focus "how the infringement behavior is implemented" when outputting the text information.

In this exemplary embodiment, the text information of the court opinion section, which is matched with each dispute focus of the court trial record and is used for assisting in obtaining the court opinion section of the official document to be generated of the court trial record, at least comprises the following text information: at least one referee rule matched with each dispute focus is applied in the court of the referee document. In this case, the determining unit 12 is further configured to determine, for each dispute focus, a referee rule most relevant to the dispute focus from the at least one referee rule matched with the dispute focus, where the referee rule most relevant to the dispute focus is a referee rule most likely to be used by the dispute focus in the court-thought section of the court record of the referee document to be generated.

One possible way for the determining unit 12 to determine the referee rule most relevant to each dispute focus includes: for each dispute focus: and counting the application probability of each referee rule matched with the dispute focus in the obtained referee document, and determining the referee rule most relevant to the dispute focus according to the application probability of each referee rule.

When the application probability is counted, the obtained referee document may be a certain number of referee documents, such as one of all the obtained referee documents, a preset number of referee documents, and a referee document with a preset ratio, where the preset number and the preset ratio may be determined according to an actual application, and the specific value is not limited in the present exemplary embodiment.

The points to be explained here are: when the number of the dispute focuses in the court trial record is multiple, the determining unit 12 may arrange the dispute focuses according to the preset order priority of the dispute focuses, and sequentially determine the referee rule most relevant to each dispute focus according to the arranged order. The predetermined sequence priority can be determined according to practical application, such as the rule that the court of the official document considers the law interpretation in the paragraph. For example, for a case of trademark right infringement dispute, the law of law interpretation in the section considered by the court of the official document is: firstly, determining whether the original report is a trademark owner, then determining whether the infringement behavior is implemented by the report, and finally solving the responsibility problems of how to compensate and the like, arranging the dispute focuses in the three aspects according to the rule, and then sequentially determining the judgment rule which is most relevant to each dispute focus according to the arranged sequence.

And for each dispute focus matched at least one referee rule: the output unit 13 can output the most relevant referee rule matching the dispute focus, and the other referee rules matching the dispute focus are used as the replacement rules of the most relevant referee rules matching the dispute focus, so that the output unit 13 outputs the replacement rules of the most relevant referee rules (i.e. the other referee rules matching the dispute focus) after ignoring the most relevant referee rules matching the dispute focus.

For example, the output unit 13 displays the most relevant referee rule matching the dispute focus, and the other referee rules matching the dispute focus are stored in the storage space as replacement rules of the most relevant referee rules matching the dispute focus, and in case of receiving an instruction to display the other referee rules matching the dispute focus, the output unit 13 extracts the other referee rules from the storage space for display.

The text information matched with each dispute focus of the court trial record further comprises: under the condition of being applicable to the laws and the case sources, the output unit 13 can output the applicable laws and the case sources corresponding to the referee rules besides the referee rules, and the applicable laws and the case sources corresponding to the referee rules most relevant to each dispute focus can also be directly displayed, the applicable laws and the case sources corresponding to other referee rules are stored in the storage space, and under the condition of being displayed by other referee rules, the applicable laws and the case sources corresponding to other referee rules are displayed.

By means of the technical scheme, for the at least one referee rule matched with each dispute focus, the most relevant referee rule of each dispute focus can be determined from the at least one referee rule matched with each dispute focus, the most relevant referee rule of each dispute focus and other referee rules in all the referee rules of each dispute focus are output, and then the most relevant referee rule of each dispute focus can be directly displayed, so that a judge can quickly acquire the most relevant referee rule of each dispute focus.

The points to be explained here are: in the above device embodiment, each keyword in the preset keyword set and the dispute focus corresponding to the preset keyword set may be manually preconfigured, for example, each keyword in the preset keyword set and the dispute focus corresponding to the preset keyword set (the dispute focus after standardized processing of the existing dispute focus) are preconfigured by the judge. And after manual configuration, each keyword in the preset keyword set and a dispute focus corresponding to the preset keyword set can be detected by a device for obtaining relevant information of the sections considered by the official document court to be generated, and the detection process can refer to relevant descriptions in the embodiment, and the embodiment of the device is not described.

In the exemplary embodiment, the apparatus for obtaining the segment-related information deemed by the official document book to be generated may include a processor and a memory, where the above-mentioned obtaining unit 11, the determining unit 12, the output unit 13, and the like are stored as program units in the memory, and the processor executes the above-mentioned program units stored in the memory to implement corresponding functions.

The processor comprises a kernel, and the kernel calls the corresponding program unit from the memory. The kernel can be set to be one or more than one, and the text information which is matched with each dispute focus of the court trial record and is used for assisting in obtaining the court recognized section of the to-be-generated referee document of the court trial record is determined from the court recognized section of the referee document which is the same as the case of the court trial record and has similar content by adjusting the kernel parameters, so that the generation efficiency of the court recognized section of the to-be-generated referee document is improved.

The memory may include volatile memory in a computer readable medium, Random Access Memory (RAM) and/or nonvolatile memory such as Read Only Memory (ROM) or flash memory (flash RAM), and the memory includes at least one memory chip.

An embodiment of the present invention provides a storage medium, on which a program is stored, where the program, when executed by a processor, implements the method for obtaining information related to segments deemed by a court of a referee document to be generated.

The embodiment of the invention provides a processor, which is used for running a program, wherein the method for obtaining the relevant information of the sections considered by the court of official documents to be generated is executed when the program runs.

The embodiment of the invention provides equipment, and the equipment can be a server, a PC, a PAD, a mobile phone and the like. The device comprises a processor, a memory and a program which is stored on the memory and can run on the processor, and the processor executes the program to realize the following steps:

determining text information which is matched with each dispute focus of the court trial record and is used for assisting in obtaining the court thought section of the court trial record to be generated of the referee document from the court thought sections of the referee document, wherein the court thought sections are part of the explanation theory of the judge in the referee document;

and outputting text information which is matched with each dispute focus of the court trial record and is used for assisting in obtaining the sections of the court deeds of the court trial record to be generated.

determining a preset keyword set matched with the extracted keywords;

Preferably, the text information includes at least: at least one referee rule matched with each dispute focus and applied in the court deem section of the referee document;

the processor executes the program and further realizes the following steps: for each dispute focus, determining a referee rule most relevant to the dispute focus from at least one referee rule matched with the dispute focus, wherein the referee rule most relevant to the dispute focus is the referee rule most probably applied to the dispute focus in the court deeming section of the court to generate the referee document of the court trial record.

Preferably, the determining the referee rule most relevant to each dispute focus from the at least one referee rule matched with each dispute focus comprises: and under the condition that the number of the dispute focuses of the court trial record is multiple, arranging the dispute focuses according to the preset sequence priority of the dispute focuses, and sequentially determining the judgment rule most relevant to the dispute focuses according to the arranged sequence.

Preferably, the outputting of the text information matched with each dispute focus of the court trial record and used for assisting in obtaining the court recognized section of the official document to be generated of the court trial record includes: and outputting text information which is matched with the dispute focuses of the court trial record and is used for assisting in obtaining the court thought section of the referee document to be generated of the court trial record according to the preset sequence priority of the dispute focuses.

An embodiment of the present invention further provides a computer program product, which, when executed on a data processing apparatus, is adapted to execute a program that initializes the following method steps:

determining a preset keyword set matched with the extracted keywords;

and determining a dispute focus corresponding to the preset keyword set as the dispute focus of the court trial record.

when executed on a data processing device, is adapted to perform a procedure for initializing further method steps: for each dispute focus, determining a referee rule most relevant to the dispute focus from at least one referee rule matched with the dispute focus, wherein the referee rule most relevant to the dispute focus is the referee rule most possibly applied to the dispute focus in the court judgment section of the court book to be generated with the referee document.

Preferably, the outputting of the text information matched with each dispute focus of the court trial record and used for assisting in obtaining the court recognized section of the official document to be generated of the court trial record includes: and outputting text information which is matched with the dispute focuses of the court trial record and is used for assisting in obtaining the court recognized section of the to-be-generated referee document of the court trial record according to the preset sequence priority of the dispute focuses.

As will be appreciated by one skilled in the art, embodiments of the present application may be provided as a method, system, or computer program product. Accordingly, the present application may take the form of an entirely hardware embodiment, an entirely software embodiment or an embodiment combining software and hardware aspects. Furthermore, the present application may take the form of a computer program product embodied on one or more computer-usable storage media (including, but not limited to, disk storage, CD-ROM, optical storage, and the like) having computer-usable program code embodied therein.

The present application is described with reference to flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams of methods, apparatus (systems), and computer program products according to embodiments of the application. It will be understood that each flow and/or block of the flow diagrams and/or block diagrams, and combinations of flows and/or blocks in the flow diagrams and/or block diagrams, can be implemented by computer program instructions. These computer program instructions may be provided to a processor of a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, embedded processor, or other programmable data processing apparatus to produce a machine, such that the instructions, which execute via the processor of the computer or other programmable data processing apparatus, create means for implementing the functions specified in the flowchart flow or flows and/or block diagram block or blocks.

These computer program instructions may also be stored in a computer-readable memory that can direct a computer or other programmable data processing apparatus to function in a particular manner, such that the instructions stored in the computer-readable memory produce an article of manufacture including instruction means which implement the function specified in the flowchart flow or flows and/or block diagram block or blocks.

These computer program instructions may also be loaded onto a computer or other programmable data processing apparatus to cause a series of operational steps to be performed on the computer or other programmable apparatus to produce a computer implemented process such that the instructions which execute on the computer or other programmable apparatus provide steps for implementing the functions specified in the flowchart flow or flows and/or block diagram block or blocks.

In a typical configuration, a computing device includes one or more processors (CPUs), input/output interfaces, network interfaces, and memory.

The memory may include forms of volatile memory in a computer readable medium, Random Access Memory (RAM) and/or non-volatile memory, such as Read Only Memory (ROM) or flash memory (flash RAM). The memory is an example of a computer-readable medium.

Computer-readable media, including both non-transitory and non-transitory, removable and non-removable media, may implement information storage by any method or technology. The information may be computer readable instructions, data structures, modules of a program, or other data. Examples of computer storage media include, but are not limited to, phase change memory (PRAM), Static Random Access Memory (SRAM), Dynamic Random Access Memory (DRAM), other types of Random Access Memory (RAM), Read Only Memory (ROM), Electrically Erasable Programmable Read Only Memory (EEPROM), flash memory or other memory technology, compact disc read only memory (CD-ROM), Digital Versatile Disks (DVD) or other optical storage, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tape magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other non-transmission medium, which can be used to store information that can be accessed by a computing device. As defined herein, a computer readable medium does not include a transitory computer readable medium such as a modulated data signal and a carrier wave.

It should also be noted that the terms "comprises," "comprising," or any other variation thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion, such that a process, method, article, or apparatus that comprises a list of elements does not include only those elements but may include other elements not expressly listed or inherent to such process, method, article, or apparatus. Without further limitation, an element defined by the phrase "comprising an … …" does not exclude the presence of other identical elements in the process, method, article, or apparatus that comprises the element.

The above are merely examples of the present application and are not intended to limit the present application. Various modifications and changes may occur to those skilled in the art. Any modification, equivalent replacement, improvement, etc. made within the spirit and principle of the present application should be included in the scope of the claims of the present application.

Claims

1. A method for obtaining information related to the sections considered by the court of official documents to be generated, the method comprising:

acquiring a court trial record and at least one referee document with the same pattern and similar content as the court trial record;

determining text information matched with each dispute focus of the court trial record and used for assisting in obtaining the court trial sections of the court trial record to be generated of the official document from the court deems of the official document, wherein the court deems are part of the legal explanation theory of the official in the official document;

outputting text information which is matched with each dispute focus of the court trial record and is used for assisting in obtaining the sections of the court deeds of the court trial record to be generated into the referee document; the text information at least includes: at least one referee rule matched with each dispute focus and applied in the court deem section of the referee document;

the method further comprises the following steps: for each dispute focus, determining a referee rule most relevant to the dispute focus from at least one referee rule matched with the dispute focus, wherein the referee rule most relevant to the dispute focus is a referee rule most probably applied to the dispute focus in a home-thought section of the court record in which the referee document to be generated is written;

for each dispute focus, determining the referee rule most relevant to the dispute focus from the at least one referee rule matched with the dispute focus comprises: for each dispute focus: and counting the application probability of each referee rule matched with the dispute focus in the obtained referee document, determining the referee rule most relevant to the dispute focus according to the application probability of each referee rule, or arranging the dispute focuses according to the preset sequence priority of the dispute focuses under the condition that the number of the dispute focuses recorded in the court trial is multiple, and sequentially determining the referee rule most relevant to the dispute focuses according to the arranged sequence.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the determining dispute focus points for the court trial excerpt comprises: extracting keywords from a preset part of the court trial record;

determining a preset keyword set matched with the extracted keywords;

3. The method of claim 1 or 2, wherein the outputting text information matched with each dispute focus of the court trial record for assisting in obtaining the court recognized sections of the generated referee document of the court trial record comprises: and outputting text information which is matched with the dispute focuses of the court trial record and is used for assisting in obtaining the court thought section of the referee document to be generated of the court trial record according to the preset sequence priority of the dispute focuses.

4. An apparatus for obtaining information on recognition segments of a official document to be generated, the apparatus comprising:

the court trial record acquiring unit is used for acquiring a court trial record and at least one referee document which has the same table composition and similar content with the court trial record;

the determining unit is used for determining each dispute focus of the court trial record and determining text information which is matched with each dispute focus of the court trial record and is used for assisting in obtaining the court recognized section of the generated court trial record of the court trial record from the court recognized section of the court trial document, wherein the dispute focus is a point which is considered as disputes by an original notice and a notice in a case corresponding to the court trial record, and the court recognized section is a part of the explanation theory of a judge in the court trial document;

the output unit is used for outputting text information which is matched with each dispute focus of the court trial record and is used for assisting in obtaining the sections of the court deems of the official documents to be generated of the court trial record; the text information at least includes: at least one referee rule matched with each dispute focus applied in the court deem section of the referee document;

the determining unit is further configured to determine, for each dispute focus, a referee rule most relevant to the dispute focus from at least one referee rule matched with the dispute focus, where the referee rule most relevant to the dispute focus is a referee rule most likely to be applied to the dispute focus in a court regarded section of the court book to be generated with the court trial record;

wherein, for each dispute focus, determining the referee rule most relevant to the dispute focus from the at least one referee rule matched with the dispute focus comprises: for each dispute focus: and counting the application probability of each referee rule matched with the dispute focus in the obtained referee document, determining the referee rule most relevant to the dispute focus according to the application probability of each referee rule, or arranging the dispute focuses according to the preset sequence priority of the dispute focuses under the condition that the number of the dispute focuses of the court trial record is multiple, and sequentially determining the referee rule most relevant to the dispute focuses according to the arranged sequence.

5. The apparatus of claim 4, wherein the means for determining the respective dispute focus of the court trial transcript comprises: extracting keywords from a preset part of the court trial record, determining a preset keyword set matched with the extracted keywords, and determining a dispute focus corresponding to the preset keyword set as the dispute focus of the court trial record.

6. A storage medium, characterized in that the storage medium has stored thereon a program which, when being executed by a processor, implements the method of obtaining information on the court of official documents to be generated as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 3.

7. A processor, characterized in that the processor is configured to run a program, wherein the program is configured to perform the method of obtaining information regarding official document courts to be generated according to any one of claims 1 to 3.