CN109377009A - A kind of evaluation method of scientific research personnel's academic aptitude - Google Patents
A kind of evaluation method of scientific research personnel's academic aptitude Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN109377009A CN109377009A CN201811118986.7A CN201811118986A CN109377009A CN 109377009 A CN109377009 A CN 109377009A CN 201811118986 A CN201811118986 A CN 201811118986A CN 109377009 A CN109377009 A CN 109377009A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- paper
- author
- periodical
- team
- academic
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 70
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 33
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 37
- 239000004577 thatch Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 14
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 11
- 238000003012 network analysis Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000013507 mapping Methods 0.000 claims 1
- 238000010219 correlation analysis Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000004140 cleaning Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000035515 penetration Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000000007 visual effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000032683 aging Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012512 characterization method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010835 comparative analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000018109 developmental process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011089 mechanical engineering Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013139 quantization Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000717 retained effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000005406 washing Methods 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
- G06Q10/06393—Score-carding, benchmarking or key performance indicator [KPI] analysis
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Educational Administration (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
The invention discloses a kind of evaluation method of scientific research personnel's academic aptitude, which includes: the paper pond obtained for carrying out academic aptitude evaluation, is cleaned to all data in paper pond, and factors affecting periodicals standard value IF is calculatedNOR=IFV/λ；Adjacency matrix, paper and the paper for constructing author refer to periodical matrix；According to the adjacency matrix of author production partner networks figure, Research Team is detected using cluster resolution ratio, makes net file for each Research Team, determines the cooperative relationship between its member composition and member；Construct Research Team and paper matrix；It calculates paper and refers to periodical value RFV_d=∑ IFNOR, calculate team and refer to periodical value RFV_t=∑ RFV_d；Calculate the European standard value BP of the western thatch index of Beaune of each member in Research TeamV；It calculatesThe application can be at the beginning of paper publishing i.e. using LVPerspective evaluation is carried out to the academic aptitude of scientific research personnel, it is as a result scientific and effective.
Description
Technical field
The invention belongs to the evaluation areas of scientific research personnel's academic aptitude, and in particular to a kind of scientific research personnel's academic aptitude is commented
Valence method.
Background technique
The method that the academic aptitude of technician introduction and scientific research personnel is evaluated at present, in addition to inviting expert in the art
It is outer to carry out qualitatively artificial evaluation, can also generally use some quantizating index to be assessed.These quantizating index are usually all
Carry out selection from paper as point of penetration, as be evaluated people written by paper drawn the frequency, paper publish periodical influence because
Son etc., wherein the frequency of being drawn of paper refers to the number quoted after paper publishing by academia, is academia to paper science
A kind of quantization means of value identity degree are the characterizations of Quality of Papers.
However, artificial qualitative evaluation system lacks unified scale and standard, it is unfavorable for constructing benefit, scientific
Talent's evaluation system；And there is also certain defects for the quantizating index of conventional selection, in fact, paper to be drawn the frequency direct
For rewarding scientific and technical personnel or evaluating the academic aptitude of scholar, dispute is endured to the fullest extent always.
Firstly, number of papers cited is from its birth, and has been labeled with the branding of " subsequent retrospect ", for just from
The frequency of being drawn of the scientific research personnel of thing academic research, paper are difficult to accurately reflect its academic potential, are commented with number of papers cited
Its academic aptitude of valence, hardly possible is existing just and sound, is unfavorable for the discovery and culture of the new talent under current period.
Secondly, paper is drawn the frequency and has completely disengaged the academic state of scholar, but be in always once being published
Growth state, the h index of author also only increases, therefore is unfavorable for the talent with the appraisement system that number of papers cited constructs and builds
If.
Third, similarly, since number of papers cited is always in growth state, number of papers cited is most
It is eventually the result is that not confirmable, the academic aptitude for measuring scientific research personnel is gone with not confirmable index, validity, science are not
It obtains and knows.
4th, when using number of papers cited as quantizating index, show science of all partners to the paper of paper
Contribution is identical.Because the frequency of being drawn that the partner of all papers obtains is complete under " assignment system in full "
Identical, what value was equal to paper is drawn the frequency.This obviously against convention, does not meet the fact.However with the elder generation of author's ranking
Sequentially determining author afterwards, there is also defects to contribution made by paper, this is because the number of author is not in different papers
It is identical, for example, be ranked first in the paper that partner's number is 10 0 author in the paper that author's number is 100 ranking
The size that 11st author contributes substance made by corresponding paper is difficult to Dan Congqi ranking to distinguish；And now very
The ranking of multi-core author (author of main substantive contribution is made to paper) in paper is frequently not first, and position is
It is unfixed.
As it can be seen that the quantizating index evaluated the academic aptitude of scientific research personnel is selected to there is this using paper as point of penetration
Matter defect.Therefore it is badly in need of wanting a kind of index that is stable, more being truly reflected and evaluate scientific research personnel's academic aptitude, with this
Construct a kind of appraisement system that can scientificlly and effectively assess scientific research personnel's academic aptitude.
Summary of the invention
Present invention purpose be to provide it is a kind of can perspectively, scientificlly and effectively to the academic aptitude of scientific research personnel
The method evaluated.
For achieving the above object, the technical solution of the application is as follows:
A kind of evaluation method of scientific research personnel's academic aptitude, comprising the following steps:
(1) the paper pond for carrying out academic aptitude evaluation is obtained, all data in paper pond are cleaned, data are clear
After the completion of washing, factors affecting periodicals standard value is calculated according to formula (1):
IFNOR=IFV/λ (1)；
Wherein, IFNORFor factors affecting periodicals standard value, IFVFor factors affecting periodicals, λ is half-life period；
(2) adjacency matrix of author is constructed, paper refers to periodical and paper matrix；
(3) partner networks figure is made according to the adjacency matrix of author, detects Research Team using cluster resolution ratio, is
Each Research Team makes net file, determines the cooperative relationship between the member's composition and member of each Research Team, and construct
Research Team and paper matrix；
(4) paper is calculated with reference to periodical and paper matrix according to paper and refers to periodical value RFV_d:
RFV_d=∑ IFNOR(5)；
Periodical value RF is referred to according to Research Team and paper matrix and paperV_dIt calculates team and refers to periodical value RFV_t:
RFV_t=∑ RFV_d(6)；
(5) according to the member of fixed Research Team composition and net file, scientific research is calculated using Social Network Analysis Method &
The European standard value BP of the western thatch index of the Beaune of each member in teamV；
(6) the academic index L of each author is calculated according to formula (8)V:
To the L of different authorsVValue is compared, and the academic aptitude of corresponding author is evaluated according to comparison result.
The measurement standard of the Academic Contribution degree of author is disputed on always constantly, is all usually in the prior art under paper unit
Analyzed, but there are irretrievable drawbacks for this method: under this analysis method, all authors of same piece paper are obtained
Drawn that the frequency is identical, to show that they are identical to the contribution degree of the paper.This is clearly not meet objective fact.
The application disengages paper, is analyzed and is made under author's unit and team's unit off the beaten trackly with a wider visual angle
The Academic Contribution degree of person: the application detects to cooperate close Research Team between author first with the adjacency matrix of author, then
The Academic Contribution degree of each author is creatively measured with Social Network Analysis Method &: using the western European standard value of thatch index of Beaune
BPVPeriodical value RF is referred to teamV_tThe distribution of the Academic Contribution degree of author is carried out, the science that can calculate each author refers to
Number LV, by comparing academic index LVThe academic aptitude of different authors can be evaluated, thus accurately in same section
All authors ground in team carry out role positioning.
In the application, team refers to periodical value RFV_tThe literature reading experience and knowledge of the Authors of Science Articles of the team are reacted
Operational capability, the quality that Authors of Science Articles reads document is higher, RF stronger with the ability of knowledgeV_tIt is higher；Improve scientific research personnel
Literature reading quality and knowledge application ability, that is, RF can be improvedV_t.Team refers to periodical value RFV_tIndependent of great
Probabilistic number of papers cited is to be determined by factors affecting periodicals standard value, and factors affecting periodicals are one definite
It is worth, is mature and is widely recognized as and is received by academia, the factors affecting periodicals standard value fluctuation of acquisition is very small,
Therefore periodical value RF is referred to using teamV_tCalculate author's science index LVIt can be sufficiently accurately to the academic energy of scientific research personnel
Power is evaluated, and evaluation result is scientific and effective, is conducive to the discovery and culture of the new talent under current period.
The European standard value BP of the western thatch index of BeauneVIt is that member's composition of Research Team and net file are calculated and obtained, and are rolled into a ball
Team refers to periodical value RFV_tFactors affecting periodicals standard value is again relied on, these factors are exactly determination at the beginning of paper is published；
Therefore for paper once delivering, team refers to periodical value RFV_tCan assignment, academic index LVCan assignment, so as in paper
Just the academic aptitude of author is evaluated at the beginning of publication.
Meanwhile if number of papers cited is regarded as academy's successes, according to the Academic Contribution degree of each author, each
Author shares to corresponding academy's successes, i.e. TCV_FRA。
It traces back in the period (such as in evaluation on July 23rd, 2018 Research Team between 2013-2017 before calculating is a certain
Academic aptitude) Research Team team refer to periodical value RFV_tWhen, while in evaluation time node (on July 23rd, 2018)
Number of papers cited and paper matrix, Research Team and paper matrix are constructed, is calculated according to number of papers cited and paper matrix
Number of papers cited TC calculates team further according to Research Team and paper matrix and number of papers cited TC and is drawn frequency TCV_t:
TCV_t=∑ TC (7)；
Calculating each author further according to formula (9), by the share shared by being drawn in the frequency, (i.e. revised author is drawn in team
The academy's successes that the frequency namely author share) TCV_FRA:
TCV_FRA=TCV_t*BPV(9)；
By to LVAnd TCV_FRACorrelation analysis is carried out, finds the academic index L of authorVWith the author in the following team
Being drawn share shared in the frequency has strong correlation relationship, this has also been proved using academic index LVThe accuracy evaluated and
Scientific and effective property shows academic index LVThe academic aptitude of author can be evaluated perspectively.Meanwhile this is also from another
A aspect finds out that the author of academic aptitude strong (academic index is high), the high probability drawn of paper appearance is bigger, academic index body
Existing is the level of author's entirety paper, this with number of papers cited than under paper unit, simply being gone to measure author's science
The appraisement system of ability is more scientific, and evaluation result is more stable, and the raising for having fully demonstrated academic aptitude is not accomplished in one move.
In the evaluation method of above-mentioned scientific research personnel's academic aptitude, in step (1), the data cleansing includes:
A, author is cleaned, to ensure that only one name written form of an author, a name written form only correspond to
One author；
B, periodical is cleaned, to reject the reference source of non-periodical, it is ensured that all papers refer to the periodical name of periodical in paper pond
It is matched with ISSN with WOS journal list, and rejects the periodical for being not belonging to WOS journal list.
The purpose of cleaning periodical is, the reference to match with the periodical in WOS journal list is only retained in reference source
Periodical.Because the impact factor of WOS periodical be by academia is widely recognized as and receive for evaluating the index of Journal Quality.When
So, if the standard for the reference source quality that other can be used to characterize non-periodical, the evaluation side of the application occurs in academia
Method can also use.
Since the impact factor difference of the periodical between different subjects is very big, the application is in order to avoid subject difference bring
Influence of the impact factor difference to the empirical results gives standardization assignment with reference to periodical to paper, calculate periodical influence because
Substandard value.
Wherein, λ is preferably drawn end half-life period.Drawn end half-life period (Cited Half-life) and a phase is shown
It prints from the current annual year for calculating number of references forward and accounting for the total number of references 50% for the periodical that is cited in cut-off current year, is to estimate
A kind of index of periodical aging speed.Certainly, drawn end half-life period in addition to using and calculate factors affecting periodicals standard value, it can also be with
Half-life period is held to be calculated using applying to draw, being drawn end half-life period is more commonly used parameter.
In step (3), the size for clustering resolution ratio determines the size of Research Team, and cluster resolution ratio is bigger, section
The quantity for grinding team is more；It needs to be configured as the case may be during actual evaluation.Under normal circumstances, it can incite somebody to action
The cluster resolution ratio value setting are as follows: r=0.0-5.0.The cluster resolution ratio value is suitable for section in most cases
Grind the detection of team, it is ensured that connecting relatively tightly, without between same Research Team between all members in same Research Team
Connection is then more loose, to effectively be divided to adjacent team, it is ensured that the independence of Research Team.
In the evaluation method of above-mentioned scientific research personnel's academic aptitude, in step (5), map first with net file, then root
The European standard value BP of the western thatch index of Beaune of each author is calculated according to formula (2) (3) (4)V:
Wherein, RijFor a relational matrix, α is an additional constant, only influences the length of vector, does not influence node
Opposite centrad size, it guarantees that the sum of square of final all centrads is the size of network；β is to measure a node to it
The parameter of his node degree of dependence；If β=0, the western thatch power indices of the Beaune of α=1, i point are the degree centrad of i point；M is
The node number of link node i, n are the quantity of the node in network, and S is mean square deviation；J is the node being connected with node i, and k is
Node in network, k include j.
Formula (2) (3) (4) can carry out operation with softwares such as software ucinet, obtain BPV.(referring to document: Bonacich
P(1987)Power and centrality:A family of measures.American journal of
sociology:1170–1182.)
Compared with prior art, the invention has the benefit that
(1) the application disengages paper, with a wider visual angle off the beaten trackly from lower point of author's unit and team's unit
Analyse the Academic Contribution degree of author: the application detects to cooperate close scientific research group between author first with the adjacency matrix of author
Team, and periodical value RF is referred to teamV_tEvaluation index as Research Team's academic aptitude；Use social network to re-creation
Network analytic approach measures the Academic Contribution degree of each author: using the European standard value BP of the western thatch index of BeauneVPeriodical is referred to team
Value RFV_tThe distribution for carrying out the Academic Contribution degree of author, can calculate the academic index L of each authorV, by comparing academic
Index LVThe academic aptitude of different authors can be evaluated, thus accurately to all works in same Research Team
Person carries out role positioning.
(2) in the application, team refers to periodical value RFV_tIndependent of great probabilistic number of papers cited, be by
What factors affecting periodicals standard value determined, and factors affecting periodicals are an explicit values, are mature and extensive for institute of academia
Recognition and acceptance, the factors affecting periodicals standard value fluctuation of acquisition is very small, therefore refers to periodical value RF using teamV_t
Calculate author's science index LVSufficiently accurately the academic aptitude of scientific research personnel can be evaluated, and evaluation result science
Effectively, be conducive to the discovery and culture of the new talent under current period.
(3) the European standard value BP of the western thatch index of BeauneVIt is that member's composition of Research Team and net file are calculated and obtained,
And team refers to periodical value RFV_tFactors affecting periodicals standard value is again relied on, these factors are exactly to determine at the beginning of paper is published
, therefore paper, once delivering, team refers to periodical value RFV_tCan assignment, academic index LVCan assignment, so as to
Paper just evaluates the academic aptitude of author at the beginning of publishing.
(4) to LVAnd TCV_FRAIt is found after carrying out correlation analysis, the academic index L of authorVWith the author in the following team
Being drawn share shared in the frequency has strong correlation relationship, this has also been proved using academic index LVThe accuracy evaluated and
Scientific and effective property shows academic index LVThe academic aptitude of author can be evaluated perspectively；This is also from another side
Find out that the author of academic aptitude strong (academic index is high), the high probability drawn of paper appearance is bigger, what academic index embodied in face
It is the level of author's entirety paper, this with number of papers cited than under paper unit, simply being gone to measure author's academic aptitude
Appraisement system it is more scientific, evaluation result is more stable, fully demonstrated academic aptitude raising not accomplish in one move.
Detailed description of the invention
Fig. 1 is author's science index LVDrawn frequency TC with author after amendmentV_FRACorrelation analysis result；
Fig. 2 is that team refers to periodical value RFV_tDrawn frequency TC with teamV_tCorrelation analysis result.
Specific embodiment
Further details of the technical solution of the present invention with reference to the accompanying drawings and detailed description.
Embodiment 1
A kind of evaluation method of scientific research personnel's academic aptitude of the present embodiment, comprising the following steps:
(1) the paper pond for carrying out academic aptitude evaluation is obtained, and data cleansing is carried out to paper pond；
A, obtain paper pond: in the SCIE of WOS (Web Of Science, WOS) " core intersection ", document type is
Article, paper publication time are -2017 years 2013, and data download time is on July 23rd, 2018.Data come from two kinds
Approach: 1) oriented acquisition: the paper of tier-2 department of the sample of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Beijing, similarly hereinafter) from its band " chem "；2)
Synthetical collection: from 1000 height for retrieving certain mechanism by introduction text, first with the mechanism for the first authors' unit is chosen
Author downloads these authors in all papers of the time interval: Chicago University (Univ of Chicago) and Washington are big
It learns (Univ of Washington)；Initial data such as table 1:
1 original data of table
Note: the author in table 1 is the author that the paper number delivered in 2013-2017 time interval is no less than 5.
B, clean author's name: to ensure that an author only has a kind of name written form, a name written form is only
A corresponding author.
C, periodical: the reference source to reject non-periodical is cleaned, it is ensured that all papers refer to the periodical name of periodical in paper pond
Match with ISSN and WOS journal list, and rejects the periodical for being not belonging to WOS journal list；
Data such as table 2 after cleaning:
Valid data after table 2 cleans
D, after the completion of data cleansing, factors affecting periodicals standard value is calculated according to formula (1):
IFNOR=IFV/λ (1)；
Wherein, IFNORFor factors affecting periodicals standard value, IFVFor factors affecting periodicals, λ is to be drawn end half-life period.
(2) adjacency matrix, author and the paper matrix, number of papers cited and paper matrix, paper for constructing author refer to
Periodical and paper matrix；
(3) according to author's adjacency matrix, the net formatted file of author's co-occurrence is obtained, with vosviewer software development cooperation
Person's network determines that cluster resolution ratio is r=0.0-5.0, detects Research Team；The net file of each Research Team is made,
Determine the cooperative relationship between the member's composition and member of each Research Team；And construct Research Team and paper matrix；
Under the cluster resolution ratio (0.0-5.0), the connection between all members in same Research Team it is relatively tight and
Connection between different Research Teams is then more loose, to effectively be divided to adjacent team；
(4) it according to the net file of the cooperative relationship between the member of fixed Research Team composition and member, adopts
The western thatch index Euclidean standard value BP of Beaune of each member in Research Team is calculated with Social Network Analysis Method &V；
Specifically, it maps first with net file, further according to formula (2) (3) (4), calculates each author with software ucinet
The European standard value BP of the western thatch index of BeauneV:
Wherein, RijFor a relational matrix, α is an additional constant, only influences the length of vector, does not influence node
Opposite centrad size, it guarantees that the sum of square of final all centrads is the size of network；β is to measure a node to it
The parameter of his node degree of dependence；If β=0, the western thatch power indices of the Beaune of α=1, i point are the degree centrad of i point；M is
The node number of link node i, n are the quantity of the node in network, and S is mean square deviation；J is the node of link node i, and k is net
Node (k includes j) in network is (referring to document: Bonacich P (1987) Power and centrality:A family of
measures.American journal of sociology:1170–1182.)；
(5) number of papers cited TC is calculated according to number of papers cited and paper matrix,
Paper, which is calculated, with reference to periodical and paper matrix according to paper refers to periodical value RFV_d:
RFV_d=∑ IFNOR(5)；
Periodical value RF is referred to according to Research Team and paper matrix and paperV_dIt calculates team and refers to periodical value RFV_t:
RFV_t=∑ RFV_d(6)；
Team, which is calculated, according to Research Team and paper matrix and number of papers cited TC is drawn frequency TCV_t:
TCV_t=∑ TC (7)；
(6) the academic index L of each author is calculated according to formula (8)V:
Calculating each author according to formula (9), by the share shared by being drawn in the frequency, (i.e. revised author is drawn frequency in team
The academy's successes that secondary namely author shares) TCV_FRA:
TCV_FRA=TCV_t*BPV(9)；
(7) correlation analysis is carried out with IBM SPSS22
3 descriptive statistic data of table
4 correlation (TC of tableV_FRA VS LV)
Note: * * indicates that correlation is upper significant (double tails) in 0.01 level, similarly hereinafter.
5 correlation (TC of tableV_t VS RFV_t)
If the analysis of table 3, table 5 and Fig. 1, Fig. 2 is the results show that RFV_tWith TCV_tThe strong correlation deposited statistically closes
System, LVWith TCV_FRADeposit strong correlation relationship statistically；Show RFV_tValue can be used to evaluate Research Team
Art ability, RFV_tHigher, the academic aptitude of Research Team is stronger；And LVIt is worth high author, is drawn frequency in population sample paper
It is in apparent advantageous position in secondary ranking, therefore can be used to evaluate the academic aptitude of author, LVIt is worth higher, the science of author
Ability is stronger.
(8) generalization is verified
It downloads in the SCIE version of WOS (Web Of Science, WOS) " core intersection " and contains in the title of Tsinghua University
" mech " tier-2 department (such as: paper Mechanical Engineering), while in subject
The paper of download part mechanism (being free of Tsinghua University) in " multidisciplinary sciences ".Paper publication time sets
Be set to " 2011-2015 ", document type is set as " article ", data download time be on August 26th, 2018, discussed
Wen Chi；The academic index of author is calculated according to step (1)-(7) method, and is chosen 5%, 10% before academic index ranking respectively
Preferred author, the Quantity of Papers of preferred author is calculated according to author and paper matrix, further according to number of papers cited and paper
Matrix calculates the number of papers cited of preferred author；It is carried out pair with total sample (team 52, author 934, paper 1968)
Than analysis, the evaluation result of academic index is verified, analyzes result such as table 6:
6 generalization comparative analysis of table
Such as table 6 as it can be seen that 5% preferred author (46) possesses 613 papers before academic index ranking, total paper number is accounted for
31.15%, and 10% preferred author (93) possesses 788 papers before academic index ranking, accounts for the 40% of total paper number；It learns
The number of papers cited of 5% preferred author (46) is 62905 times before art index ranking, accounts for total number of papers cited
57.68%, and the number of papers cited of 10% preferred author (93) is 76307 times before academic index ranking, accounts for total paper
Drawn the 69.97% of the frequency；
And 10 papers that total sample is drawn before frequency collating ten are sent out by before academic index ranking 10% preferred author
Table (accounting 100%), wherein there is 7 then to deliver (accounting 70%) by before academic index ranking 5% preferred author；Total sample quilt
Draw before frequency collating in 20 paper, 19 papers are the (accountings delivered by before academic index ranking 10% preferred author
95%), wherein there is 15 then to deliver (accounting 75%) by before academic index ranking 5% preferred author.
Above data shows in the sample of this control group, 10% before academic index ranking (especially preceding 5%) it is excellent
Select author not only to deliver more paper, but also the quality of published articles is very excellent, be the outstanding person in tested sample, this with
The evaluation result of academic this evaluation index of index matches.
Claims (5)
1. a kind of evaluation method of scientific research personnel's academic aptitude, which comprises the following steps:
(1) the paper pond for carrying out academic aptitude evaluation is obtained, all data in paper pond are cleaned, data cleansing is complete
Cheng Hou calculates factors affecting periodicals standard value according to formula (1):
IFNOR=IFV/λ (1)；
Wherein, IFNORFor factors affecting periodicals standard value, IFVFor factors affecting periodicals, λ is half-life period；
(2) adjacency matrix of author is constructed, paper refers to periodical and paper matrix；
(3) partner networks figure is made according to the adjacency matrix of author, detects Research Team using cluster resolution ratio, is each
Research Team makes net file, determines the cooperative relationship between the member's composition and member of each Research Team, and construct scientific research
Team and paper matrix；
(4) paper is calculated with reference to periodical and paper matrix according to paper and refers to periodical value RFV_d:
RFV_d=∑ IFNOR(5)；
Periodical value RF is referred to according to Research Team and paper matrix and paperV_dIt calculates team and refers to periodical value RFV_t:
RFV_t=∑ RFV_d(6)；
(5) according to the member of fixed Research Team composition and net file, Research Team is calculated using Social Network Analysis Method &
In each member the European standard value BP of the western thatch index of BeauneV；
(6) the academic index L of each author is calculated according to formula (8)V:
To the L of different authorsVValue is compared, and the academic aptitude of corresponding author is evaluated according to comparison result.
2. the evaluation method of scientific research personnel's academic aptitude as described in claim 1, which is characterized in that described in step (1)
Data cleansing includes:
A, author is cleaned, to ensure that only one name written form of an author, a name written form only correspond to one
Author；
B, clean periodical, to reject the reference source of non-periodical, it is ensured that in paper pond all papers with reference to periodical periodical name and
ISSN matches with WOS journal list, and rejects the periodical for being not belonging to WOS journal list.
3. the evaluation method of scientific research personnel's academic aptitude as described in claim 1, which is characterized in that the half-life period is quilt
Draw end half-life period.
4. the evaluation method of scientific research personnel's academic aptitude as described in claim 1, which is characterized in that described in step (3)
Cluster resolution ratio value are as follows: r=0.0-5.0.
5. the evaluation method of scientific research personnel's academic aptitude as described in claim 1, which is characterized in that in step (5), first with
The mapping of net file, the European standard value BP of the western thatch index of Beaune of each author is calculated further according to formula (2) (3) (4)V:
Wherein, RijFor a relational matrix, α is an additional constant, only influences the length of vector, does not influence the opposite of node
Centrad size, it guarantees that the sum of square of final all centrads is the size of network；β is to measure a node to other knots
The parameter of point degree of dependence；If β=0, the western thatch power indices of the Beaune of α=1, i point are the degree centrad of i point；M is connection
The node number of node i, n are the quantity of the node in network, and S is mean square deviation；J is the node of link node i, and k is in network
Node, k include j.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201811118986.7A CN109377009A (en) | 2018-09-25 | 2018-09-25 | A kind of evaluation method of scientific research personnel's academic aptitude |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201811118986.7A CN109377009A (en) | 2018-09-25 | 2018-09-25 | A kind of evaluation method of scientific research personnel's academic aptitude |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN109377009A true CN109377009A (en) | 2019-02-22 |
Family
ID=65401839
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201811118986.7A Pending CN109377009A (en) | 2018-09-25 | 2018-09-25 | A kind of evaluation method of scientific research personnel's academic aptitude |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN109377009A (en) |
Cited By (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN110163487A (en) * | 2019-04-26 | 2019-08-23 | 浙江理工大学 | The paper citation impact power standardized method that non-subject relies on |
| CN110399502A (en) * | 2019-06-18 | 2019-11-01 | 东华大学 | A kind of learning value evaluation method of subject books |
| CN110991924A (en) * | 2019-12-13 | 2020-04-10 | 电子科技大学 | Structural equation model-based high-level thesis publication number influence factor evaluation method |
| CN111027868A (en) * | 2019-12-13 | 2020-04-17 | 电子科技大学 | Structural equation model-based academic dissertation quality influence factor evaluation method |
| CN111369131A (en) * | 2020-02-28 | 2020-07-03 | 深圳前海微众银行股份有限公司 | Talent assessment method, device and equipment based on AI and readable storage medium |
-
2018
- 2018-09-25 CN CN201811118986.7A patent/CN109377009A/en active Pending
Cited By (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN110163487A (en) * | 2019-04-26 | 2019-08-23 | 浙江理工大学 | The paper citation impact power standardized method that non-subject relies on |
| CN110399502A (en) * | 2019-06-18 | 2019-11-01 | 东华大学 | A kind of learning value evaluation method of subject books |
| CN110991924A (en) * | 2019-12-13 | 2020-04-10 | 电子科技大学 | Structural equation model-based high-level thesis publication number influence factor evaluation method |
| CN111027868A (en) * | 2019-12-13 | 2020-04-17 | 电子科技大学 | Structural equation model-based academic dissertation quality influence factor evaluation method |
| CN111369131A (en) * | 2020-02-28 | 2020-07-03 | 深圳前海微众银行股份有限公司 | Talent assessment method, device and equipment based on AI and readable storage medium |
| CN111369131B (en) * | 2020-02-28 | 2024-04-30 | 深圳前海微众银行股份有限公司 | Talent assessment method, device and equipment based on AI (advanced technology attachment), and readable storage medium |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN109377009A (en) | A kind of evaluation method of scientific research personnel's academic aptitude | |
| Peters et al. | Influence of choice set considerations in modeling the benefits from improved water quality | |
| Wang et al. | Functional bid landscape forecasting for display advertising | |
| CN110717654B (en) | Product quality evaluation method and system based on user comments | |
| CN108805176A (en) | A kind of fish meal feeding volume prediction technique returned based on random forest | |
| CN104881715B (en) | A kind of method that paper plant predicts pulp property according to waste paper proportioning | |
| Oberhofer | Employment effects of acquisitions: Evidence from acquired European firms | |
| Kokko et al. | Individual mating success, lek stability, and the neglected limitations of statistical power | |
| CN109359824A (en) | A kind of evaluation method of the academic level of subject | |
| CN109685330A (en) | A kind of assessment and prediction technique of Journals influence power | |
| Jula et al. | Environmental Kuznets curve. Evidence from Romania | |
| Tamara et al. | Attractiveness, trustworthiness and purchase intention in social media Instagram: the moderating role of the number of followers | |
| Frank et al. | Descriptive differential attributes of type of fleeces in Llama fibre and its textile consequence: 1–Descriptive aspects | |
| CN108876199A (en) | A kind of commercial bid evaluation method based on multidimensional Weighted Fuzzy Study on similar degree method | |
| CN109558490A (en) | A method of improving Journals influence power | |
| Jeon et al. | Is performance of scholars correlated to their research collaboration patterns? | |
| CN111159644A (en) | Method and system for valuation of an initial enterprise | |
| CN109242331A (en) | A kind of evaluation method of Research Team's academic aptitude | |
| CN110163487A (en) | The paper citation impact power standardized method that non-subject relies on | |
| CN110298762A (en) | A kind of family ranch culture efficiency analysis system | |
| CN108388911A (en) | A kind of mobile subscriber's Dynamic Fuzzy Clustering Algorithm method towards mixed attributes | |
| CN114445141A (en) | Customer demand obtaining method | |
| CN107179297A (en) | A kind of intelligent category of annatto authentication method and its platform | |
| Tacchetti et al. | Learning truthful, efficient, and welfare maximizing auction rules | |
| CN103780461B (en) | Measurement method of Web QoS through overall consideration of subjective weight and objective weight |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |
Application publication date: 20190222 |