CN109347499B - Method for analyzing interference mechanism of radio frequency front end of communication receiver - Google Patents
Method for analyzing interference mechanism of radio frequency front end of communication receiver Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN109347499B CN109347499B CN201811155760.4A CN201811155760A CN109347499B CN 109347499 B CN109347499 B CN 109347499B CN 201811155760 A CN201811155760 A CN 201811155760A CN 109347499 B CN109347499 B CN 109347499B
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- interference
- signal
- receiver
- frequency
- radio frequency
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04B—TRANSMISSION
- H04B1/00—Details of transmission systems, not covered by a single one of groups H04B3/00 - H04B13/00; Details of transmission systems not characterised by the medium used for transmission
- H04B1/06—Receivers
- H04B1/10—Means associated with receiver for limiting or suppressing noise or interference
- H04B1/1027—Means associated with receiver for limiting or suppressing noise or interference assessing signal quality or detecting noise/interference for the received signal
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04B—TRANSMISSION
- H04B17/00—Monitoring; Testing
- H04B17/20—Monitoring; Testing of receivers
- H04B17/29—Performance testing
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- Signal Processing (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Electromagnetism (AREA)
- Noise Elimination (AREA)
Abstract
The invention provides a method for analyzing an interference mechanism of a radio frequency front end of a communication receiver, which is characterized in that a nonlinear mathematical model of the communication receiver under the interference action is established according to a radio frequency front end circuit of the receiver, the interference action mechanism and the interference characteristic are found out, different interference types formed under different frequency relation conditions of a useful signal and an interference signal are analyzed, and an interference generating condition and a quantitative analysis method of strongest interference in each type are obtained. And calculating to obtain a maximum interference signal which does not influence the reception of the useful signal by utilizing the analysis result and the minimum signal-to-noise ratio requirement of the receiver, and finally obtaining the quantitative suppression requirement of the interference signal by combining the actual interference signal size to realize the quantitative design of the interference cancellation device index. The invention not only can accurately clarify the action mechanism of different interference types formed under the simultaneous action of the useful signal and the interference signal, but also can accurately calculate the interference suppression requirement, and can realize the quantitative suppression design of the co-location interference of the communication system.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to the technical field of electromagnetic compatibility analysis design, in particular to a method for analyzing an interference mechanism of a radio frequency front end of a communication receiver.
Background
The independent platforms such as ships, war chariot, fighter plane, etc. are equipped with various devices such as communication, radar, electronic warfare, etc., and the common point of the devices is that the devices need to complete the transmission or reception of signals by means of antennas, resulting in dense antennas on the platforms and insufficient mutual space isolation. The transmitting antenna transmits a high-power signal to a far-end receiver, the receiver receives a weak communication signal from a far end, and a local transmitting signal is a useless signal for the local receiver and is a strong co-location interference signal. When the distance between the transmitting antenna and the receiving antenna is close, although the difference between the frequency of the transmitted signal and the frequency of the received signal is far, because a strong interference signal generated by the transmitter enters the receiver through space radiation, a front end circuit of the receiver is saturated or the sensitivity of the receiver is reduced, the receiver cannot normally work, and the electromagnetic compatibility problem of a communication system is caused.
An effective method for solving the electromagnetic compatibility problem adopts a radiation interference self-adaptive cancellation technology, and the basic principle is that a reference signal is extracted at a transmitting end, a cancellation signal which is equal to the interference signal in size and opposite to the interference signal is generated through a self-adaptive control algorithm, and the cancellation signal is positively and negatively cancelled with the interference signal at the front end of a receiver, so that the interference is eliminated. For example, the multi-channel interference cancellation device (patent number: ZL201518001239.6) invented by the applicant can simultaneously cancel the co-location coupling interference of the co-platform multi-channel transmitter to the receiver, and ensure the simultaneous compatible operation of the transceiver system.
The interference of the transceiver in the communication system is caused by a plurality of factors, and an interference action mechanism model and an analysis method must be studied in depth to thoroughly solve the problem of interference elimination. Previous studies have not modeled receiver systems containing both useful and interfering signals, and have failed to accurately reveal the mechanisms of action of different types of interference. The quantitative suppression design of the co-location radiated interference of the communication system can be realized only if the quantitative corresponding relation between the interference suppression ratio and the received signal-to-noise ratio is correctly established.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention aims to provide a method for analyzing an interference mechanism of a radio frequency front end of a communication receiver aiming at the defects of the prior art, and the quantitative design of the indexes of an interference cancellation device is realized.
The invention provides a method for analyzing an interference mechanism of a radio frequency front end of a signal receiver, which comprises the following steps: analyzing different interference types formed under different frequency relation conditions when a useful signal and an interference signal are input at the radio frequency front end of the communication receiver, so as to obtain the generating conditions of co-frequency interference, harmonic interference, intermodulation interference and an analyzing method; and calculating to obtain a maximum interference signal which does not influence the reception of the useful signal by utilizing the analysis result and the minimum signal-to-noise ratio requirement of the receiver, and finally obtaining the quantitative suppression requirement of the interference signal by combining the actual interference signal size to realize the quantitative design of the interference cancellation device index.
The invention adopts the following steps to analyze:
setting the input signal of the radio frequency front end of the communication receiver as VinThe output signal is VoutUsing a third order nonlinear model (a)1、a2、a3Third order linear factors, respectively) to describe the rf front-end characteristics of a communication receiver, can be expressed as:
if the input signal VinFrom frequency ωSAmplitude of VSAnd two of the useful signal
Frequency of omega respectivelyI1And ωI2Respectively having an amplitude of VI1And VI2The interference signal components of (a), namely:
Vin=Vscosωst+VI1cosω11t+VI2cosω12t
then the signal V is outputoutCan be expressed as a number of times,
Vout=a1(Vscosωst+VI1cosωI1t+VI2cosωI2t)+a2(Vscosωst+VI1cosωI1t+VI2cosωI2t)2+a3(VScosωSt+VI1cosωI1t+VI2cosωI2t)3
the minimum requirement of signal-to-noise ratio for ensuring the communication receiving quality is SNR, the original amplitude of an interference signal is V, and the residual amplitude of the interference when the SNR is expected to reach is VreThen the interference suppression requirement is:
RdB=20log(V)-20log(Vre)
specifically to each type of interference, the co-channel interference suppression requirements are:
the harmonic interference rejection requirements are:
the intermodulation interference rejection requirements are:
the intermodulation interference suppression requirements are:
the modeling method for describing the front-end circuit of the receiver by adopting the third-order nonlinear model can accurately clarify the action mechanism of different interference types formed under the simultaneous action of the useful signal and the interference signal. The invention establishes the quantitative corresponding relation between the interference suppression ratio and the receiving signal-to-noise ratio, can accurately analyze the relation between the interference suppression requirement and the interference signal amplitude and the relation between the interference suppression requirement and the useful signal amplitude by utilizing the established mathematical model, can realize the co-site interference quantitative suppression design of a communication system, and provides quantitative design input for key technical indexes such as the interference cancellation ratio, the dynamic range and the like of the radiation interference self-adaptive cancellation device.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a diagram of an exemplary communication receiver front end circuit in accordance with the present invention
FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a third-order nonlinear model implemented in the present invention
FIG. 3 is a graph of the quantitative relationship between the RF interference suppression requirement and the amplitude of the desired received signal
FIG. 4 is a graph of the quantitative relationship between the RF interference rejection requirement and the interfering signal amplitude
Fig. 5 is a graph showing the quantitative relationship between the rf interference suppression requirement and the linearity of the front-end circuitry of the receiver.
Detailed Description
The invention will be further described in detail with reference to the following drawings and specific examples, which are not intended to limit the invention, but are for clear understanding.
Taking Amplitude Modulation (AM) communication as an example, let the received useful signal be:
νu(t)=[Au+m(t)]cosωut
wherein A isuIs the amplitude, ωuM (t) is a modulation signal, which is a carrier frequency.
Taking two amplitude modulated interferers of the same parameters as an example, two amplitude modulated transmitter signals causing co-site interference can be understood as follows:
vi1(t)=[Ai1+mi1(t)]cosωi1t,vi2(t)=[Ai2+mi2(t)]cosωi2t
the receiver input signal may be represented as:
vin(t)=[Au+m(t)]cosωut+[Ai1+mi1(t)]cosωi1t+[Ai2+mi2(t)]cosωi2t
let Vu=Au+m(t),Vi1=Ai1+mi1(t),Vi2=Ai2+mi2(t), the output signal of the front-end circuit of the communication receiver (fig. 1) is:
as can be seen from the above equation, the nonlinear effect of the receiver produces new frequency components. The newly generated frequency components produce different interference effects due to the difference between the frequency of the interference signal and the frequency of the useful signal, and are analyzed below.
(1) Same frequency interference
When the interference signal frequency and the useful signal frequency satisfy | ωI-ωSWhen the value is greater than 2 pi.delta f, the delta f is the 'audio' band-pass filtering bandwidth of the receiver, and the receiver can be interfered. The co-channel interference does not need to cause the nonlinearity of the receiver, and is directly demodulated by the receiver, and the threshold for generating the interference is very low. The corresponding output signal-to-noise ratio is as follows:
(2) harmonic interference
When the frequency of the interference signal and the frequency of the useful signal satisfy | N · ωI-ωSProduced when | is less than 2 π Δ f. Harmonic interference is the stronger of the receiver nonlinear interference, and the interference threshold is lower. In general, a receiver is designed in a symmetrical sampling mode, even-order nonlinear coefficients can be greatly reduced, and even-order harmonic interference can be ignored. Only odd-order harmonic interference is considered, wherein the third-order harmonic interference is strongest, and the corresponding output signal-to-noise ratio is as follows:
usually has a1>>a3The above formula can be simplified as:
(3) intermodulation interference
When the interference signal frequency and the useful signal frequency satisfyThe time is generated, wherein the third-order intermodulation interference is strongest, and the three-order intermodulation interference is two items in total, and the corresponding output signal-to-noise ratios are respectively as follows:
when V isI1=VI2=VIWhen, and usually has a1>>a3The above formula can be simplified as:
(4) intermodulation interference
When the frequencies of two paths of interference signals meet the absolute value of N1·ωI1-N2·ωI2If | < 2 π Δ f, the third-order intermodulation interference is strongest, and the corresponding output SNR is:
when V isI1=VI2=VIWhen, and usually has a1>>a3The above formula can be simplified as:
in order to make the error rate of the useful signal output by the receiver within the allowable range, it is necessary to make the output of the receiver have a certain signal-to-noise ratio (e.g. SNR is 20dB), so as to ensure the communication reception quality. The original amplitude of the interference signal is set as V, and the residual amplitude of the interference when the signal-to-noise ratio SNR is expected to be reached is set as VreThen the interference suppression requirement can be defined as:
RdB=20log(V)-20log(Vre)
specifically to each type of interference, the co-channel interference suppression requirement can be quantitatively calculated as:
the harmonic interference rejection requirements are:
the intermodulation interference rejection requirements are:
the intermodulation interference suppression requirements are:
figure 3 shows the quantitative relationship between the radio frequency interference rejection requirement and the amplitude of the desired received signal. For same-frequency interference, the interference suppression requirement is reduced by 10dB every time a useful signal is increased by 10 dB; for third-order harmonic interference and third-order intermodulation interference, the interference suppression requirement is reduced by 10dB every time a useful signal is increased by 30 dB; for the third-order intermodulation interference, the size of a useful signal is increased, and the interference suppression requirement cannot be reduced.
Fig. 4 shows the quantitative relationship between the radio frequency interference suppression requirement and the interfering signal amplitude. For co-channel interference, harmonic interference, intermodulation interference and intermodulation interference, the interference rejection requirement increases by 10dB for every 10dB increase in the interfering signal.
Fig. 5 shows a quantitative relationship between the requirements for radio frequency interference suppression and the linearity of the front-end circuitry of the receiver. For same frequency interference, the linearity is increased, and the requirement for reducing interference suppression is not influenced; for harmonic interference and intermodulation interference, the interference rejection requirement is reduced by 3.33dB for every 10dB increase in linearity; for intermodulation interference, the interference suppression requirement is reduced by 5dB for every 10dB increase in linearity.
The technical effects of the present invention are illustrated by examples. Assuming that the transmitting power of the communication station is 60dBm and the isolation of the transmitting and receiving antennas is 30dB, the interference power is 60-30 dBm, i.e. 137dB μ V. The amplitude of the useful signal is respectively 60dB mu V and 0dB mu V for calculation. The linearity of the receiver is set to 10 (poor receiver performance and heavy nonlinearity) and 100 (good receiver performance and light nonlinearity). In order to make the output signal-to-noise ratio of the receiver 20dB, the same frequency interference, harmonic interference, intermodulation interference and intermodulation interference rejection requirements can be calculated as shown in table 1 using the present invention.
TABLE 1 quantitative suppression requirement for various types of interference
In actual communication, the transceiver stations of the common platform can not work at the same frequency, and the same frequency interference can not occur. The radiated interference cancellation technique can suppress harmonic interference, intermodulation interference and intermodulation interference. As shown in table 1, when the cancellation apparatus is used to suppress the interference of the receiver, in order to ensure the communication quality, it is necessary to achieve an interference cancellation ratio of about 40dB when the desired signal is large (60dB μ V) and an interference cancellation ratio of about 60dB when the desired signal is small (0dB μ V). Therefore, in practical engineering application, the cancellation ratio of the interference cancellation device must reach 40dB-60dB to meet the interference management requirements of independent platform communication systems such as ships, war vehicles and fighters.
The method is also suitable for interference mechanism analysis of a Frequency Modulation (FM) communication mode.
The invention has been described with reference to the detailed drawings of the preferred embodiments. Those skilled in the art can derive numerous variations from the preferred embodiments without departing from the scope of the invention. Accordingly, the preferred embodiments do not limit the scope of the invention. The scope of the invention is defined as the claims.
Those not described in detail in this specification are within the skill of the art.
Claims (1)
1. A method for analyzing interference mechanism of radio frequency front end of communication receiver is characterized by comprising the following steps: analyzing useful signals and interference signals input by the radio frequency front end of the communication receiver, and forming different interference types under different frequency relation conditions, so as to obtain the generating conditions of co-channel interference, harmonic interference, intermodulation interference and an analyzing method; calculating to obtain a maximum interference signal which does not influence the reception of a useful signal by using the analysis result and the minimum signal-to-noise ratio requirement of the receiver, and finally obtaining the quantitative inhibition requirement of the interference signal by combining the actual interference signal size;
setting the input signal of the radio frequency front end of the communication receiver asV inThe output signal isV outDescribing the radio frequency front end characteristic of the communication receiver by adopting a third-order nonlinear model as follows:
wherein the content of the first and second substances,a 1、a 2、a 3respectively, three-order linear factors;
if the input signal isV inFrom a frequency ofWith a magnitude ofV SRespectively of two frequenciesAndrespectively has an amplitude ofAndof interfering signals, i.e.:
Then output the signalV outCan be expressed as:
let the original amplitude of the interfering signal beV;The signal-to-noise ratio desired to achieve the reception quality of the communication isSNRResidual amplitude of time interference isV re,A band pass filter bandwidth for the receiver audio;
the interference suppression requirements are:
when the interference signal frequency and the useful signal frequency satisfyCo-channel interference is generated, and the output signal-to-noise ratio SNR is as follows:
the interference suppression requirements are:
when the interference signal frequency and the useful signal frequency satisfyHarmonic interference is generated, and the output signal-to-noise ratio is as follows:
the interference suppression requirements are:
when the interference signal frequency and the useful signal frequency satisfyIntermodulation interference is generated, and the output signal-to-noise ratio is as follows:
the interference suppression requirements are:
when the frequencies of two paths of interference signals meetAnd generating intermodulation interference, wherein the output signal-to-noise ratio is as follows:
the interference suppression requirements are:
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201811155760.4A CN109347499B (en) | 2018-09-30 | 2018-09-30 | Method for analyzing interference mechanism of radio frequency front end of communication receiver |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201811155760.4A CN109347499B (en) | 2018-09-30 | 2018-09-30 | Method for analyzing interference mechanism of radio frequency front end of communication receiver |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN109347499A CN109347499A (en) | 2019-02-15 |
CN109347499B true CN109347499B (en) | 2022-03-29 |
Family
ID=65308366
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN201811155760.4A Active CN109347499B (en) | 2018-09-30 | 2018-09-30 | Method for analyzing interference mechanism of radio frequency front end of communication receiver |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN109347499B (en) |
Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN101793924A (en) * | 2009-10-30 | 2010-08-04 | 北京航空航天大学 | Method for analyzing threshold of radiation intermodulation immunity of radio-frequency receiver |
CN102164013A (en) * | 2011-04-18 | 2011-08-24 | 西安电子科技大学 | Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) comprehensive predictive analysis system and analysis method for co-site interference of radio station |
CN102684799A (en) * | 2012-04-26 | 2012-09-19 | 西安电子科技大学 | Spectrum data evaluation method for same-vehicle multi-machine communication system |
CN106027176A (en) * | 2016-06-29 | 2016-10-12 | 中国人民解放军军械工程学院 | Receiver in-band dual frequency electromagnetic radiation large signal blocking interference effect prediction method |
-
2018
- 2018-09-30 CN CN201811155760.4A patent/CN109347499B/en active Active
Patent Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN101793924A (en) * | 2009-10-30 | 2010-08-04 | 北京航空航天大学 | Method for analyzing threshold of radiation intermodulation immunity of radio-frequency receiver |
CN102164013A (en) * | 2011-04-18 | 2011-08-24 | 西安电子科技大学 | Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) comprehensive predictive analysis system and analysis method for co-site interference of radio station |
CN102684799A (en) * | 2012-04-26 | 2012-09-19 | 西安电子科技大学 | Spectrum data evaluation method for same-vehicle multi-machine communication system |
CN106027176A (en) * | 2016-06-29 | 2016-10-12 | 中国人民解放军军械工程学院 | Receiver in-band dual frequency electromagnetic radiation large signal blocking interference effect prediction method |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
接收机带内双频阻塞干扰机理建模与验证;王雅平等;《北京理工大学学报》;20180731(第7期);全文 * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN109347499A (en) | 2019-02-15 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US9252831B2 (en) | Multi-tap adaptive filter for transmit signal leakage cancellation | |
US8300561B2 (en) | Methods and apparatus for canceling distortion in full-duplex transceivers | |
US9350398B2 (en) | Multiple interferer cancellation for communications systems | |
Korpi et al. | Advanced self-interference cancellation and multiantenna techniques for full-duplex radios | |
US9306618B2 (en) | Filter enhancer and method | |
Faulkner | DC offset and IM2 removal in direct conversion receivers | |
US5905574A (en) | Method and apparatus for canceling cross polarization interference | |
JP6197104B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for canceling signal in wireless communication system | |
US6714775B1 (en) | Interference canceller | |
US20180175907A1 (en) | Binary high-power modulator | |
CN105591656B (en) | A kind of gain flatness compensation method of transceiver | |
US20140064348A1 (en) | Digital Post-Distortion Compensation in Telecommunication Systems | |
Korpi et al. | Digital self-interference cancellation under nonideal RF components: Advanced algorithms and measured performance | |
van Liempd et al. | An electrical-balance duplexer for in-band full-duplex with<-85dBm in-band distortion at+ 10dBm TX-power | |
CN109001693B (en) | Method and system for suppressing direct wave of frequency modulation continuous wave radar | |
CN109412639B (en) | Microwave communication same frequency interference protector | |
US6473596B1 (en) | Close proximity transmitter interference limiting | |
Sadjina et al. | A circuit technique for blocker-induced modulated spur cancellation in 4G LTE carrier aggregation transceivers | |
Ahmed et al. | Optimized interference canceling for colocated base station transceivers | |
CN109347499B (en) | Method for analyzing interference mechanism of radio frequency front end of communication receiver | |
Kiayani et al. | Active RF cancellation of nonlinear TX leakage in FDD transceivers | |
Adles et al. | Interferer cancellation in coherent optical RF receivers via optical phase modulation | |
Zhao et al. | Impacts of attenuators on analog self-interference cancellation in full duplex radios | |
US10164816B2 (en) | Device and method for transmitting data | |
Ahmed et al. | An adaptive cancellation system for a colocated receiver and its dynamic range |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PB01 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
GR01 | Patent grant |