CN109271669A - A kind of design method of wind-resistance solar board mount - Google Patents
A kind of design method of wind-resistance solar board mount Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN109271669A CN109271669A CN201810932590.XA CN201810932590A CN109271669A CN 109271669 A CN109271669 A CN 109271669A CN 201810932590 A CN201810932590 A CN 201810932590A CN 109271669 A CN109271669 A CN 109271669A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- wind
- critical
- coefficient
- solar
- average aerodynamic
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 21
- 230000003068 static effect Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 5
- 230000006641 stabilisation Effects 0.000 claims description 9
- 238000011105 stabilization Methods 0.000 claims description 9
- 230000001133 acceleration Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000005336 cracking Methods 0.000 description 8
- 238000011144 upstream manufacturing Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000005484 gravity Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000009434 installation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000010248 power generation Methods 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H02—GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
- H02S—GENERATION OF ELECTRIC POWER BY CONVERSION OF INFRARED RADIATION, VISIBLE LIGHT OR ULTRAVIOLET LIGHT, e.g. USING PHOTOVOLTAIC [PV] MODULES
- H02S20/00—Supporting structures for PV modules
- H02S20/20—Supporting structures directly fixed to an immovable object
- H02S20/22—Supporting structures directly fixed to an immovable object specially adapted for buildings
- H02S20/23—Supporting structures directly fixed to an immovable object specially adapted for buildings specially adapted for roof structures
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F30/00—Computer-aided design [CAD]
- G06F30/10—Geometric CAD
- G06F30/17—Mechanical parametric or variational design
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01W—METEOROLOGY
- G01W1/00—Meteorology
- G01W1/10—Devices for predicting weather conditions
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H02—GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
- H02S—GENERATION OF ELECTRIC POWER BY CONVERSION OF INFRARED RADIATION, VISIBLE LIGHT OR ULTRAVIOLET LIGHT, e.g. USING PHOTOVOLTAIC [PV] MODULES
- H02S30/00—Structural details of PV modules other than those related to light conversion
- H02S30/10—Frame structures
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02B—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO BUILDINGS, e.g. HOUSING, HOUSE APPLIANCES OR RELATED END-USER APPLICATIONS
- Y02B10/00—Integration of renewable energy sources in buildings
- Y02B10/10—Photovoltaic [PV]
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02E—REDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
- Y02E10/00—Energy generation through renewable energy sources
- Y02E10/50—Photovoltaic [PV] energy
Abstract
The invention discloses a kind of design methods of wind-resistance solar board mount comprising following steps: step 1: measuring the quality of solar bracket, with reference to projected area, reference length, reference width, reference altitude and confficient of static friction；Step 2: Average aerodynamic suffered by solar bracket power, Average aerodynamic sidewind force and Average aerodynamic vertical force with the wind are obtained；Step 3: the torque of each state of solar bracket is obtained；Step 4: the average wind coefficient of all directions is calculated；Step 5: it calculates Average aerodynamic and waves torque coefficient, Average aerodynamic pitching moment coefficient and Average aerodynamic deflection torque coefficient；Step 6: the critical wind velocity of several states is found out；Step 7: the critical mass of each state of solar bracket is calculated.The present invention can be according to the corresponding solar panels bracket of required windproof Intensity Design.
Description
Technical field
The present invention relates to a kind of design methods of wind-resistance solar board mount.
Background technique
Currently, the temperature of top layer can not only be lowered by installing solar panels at the top of house, environment-protecting clean can also be obtained
Electric energy.It, every time will be according to factors such as size, number of plies height and wind-force resist abilities as on a large scale in balcony installation
It goes to design, and these conditions and problem often increase cost and the time of engineering, enables project not send out and obtain reasonable benefit.
Summary of the invention
The object of the present invention is to provide a kind of design methods of wind-resistance solar board mount, can be strong according to required windproof
Degree designs corresponding solar panels bracket.
To achieve the above object, the design method of a kind of wind-resistance solar board mount provided by the present invention comprising such as
Lower step: step 1: measuring the mass M of solar bracket, with reference to projected area As, reference length L, reference width B, reference
Height H and confficient of static friction μ；Step 2: according to the system of wind axes under wind tunnel test obtain solar bracket suffered by put down
Pneumatic power with the windAverage aerodynamic sidewind forceAnd Average aerodynamic vertical forceStep 3: according to wind-tunnel
System of wind axes under test show that Average aerodynamic suffered by solar bracket waves torqueAverage aerodynamic pitching momentWith Average aerodynamic deflection torqueStep 4: according to the numerical value of step 1 and step 2, solar energy is calculated
The bracket force coefficient C with the wind of the Average aerodynamic under system of wind axes respectivelyd, Average aerodynamic beam wind force coefficient ClIt is perpendicular with Average aerodynamic
To force coefficient Cz；Step 5: according to the numerical value of step 1 and step 3, solar bracket is calculated respectively in system of wind axes
Lower Average aerodynamic waves torque coefficient Cmh, Average aerodynamic pitching moment coefficient CmvWith Average aerodynamic deflection torque coefficient Cmz；Step
Six: the numerical value calculated according to step 1 to step 5 finds out sideslip critical wind velocity Us, turn on one's side critical wind velocity Umh, start and face
Boundary's wind velocity Umv, deflection critical wind velocity Umz；The calculation formula of the sideslip critical wind velocity isIt is described rollover critical wind velocity calculation formula beThe calculation formula for starting critical wind velocity isThe calculation formula of the deflection critical wind speed isThe KsFor the sideslip coefficient of stability, KmhFor
The rollover coefficient of stability, KmvTo start the coefficient of stability and KmzFor yaw stabilization coefficient；Step 7: under known wind pressure, according to step
Six each critical wind velocity calculation formula is rewritten, and can show that solar bracket keeps critical mass when stablizing；It breaks away most
Small quality:Rollover critical mass:Start critical mass: Deflection critical quality: Show that solar bracket can reach according to above-mentioned formula
Various situations stablize required minimum mass.
In the design method of above-mentioned wind-resistance solar board mount, in the step 3,The CfF=
d,l,z。
In the design method of above-mentioned wind-resistance solar board mount, in the step 4,The Cmf's
Mf=mh, mv, mz.
In the design method of above-mentioned wind-resistance solar board mount, the numerical value of the gravity acceleration g in the step 5 is
9.81m/s2。
In the design method of above-mentioned wind-resistance solar board mount, according to the formula of the step 6 and/or the step 7,
The dimensional parameters demand of solar bracket can be inversely designed in known critical mass and the parameter of critical wind velocity.
A kind of design method of wind-resistance solar board mount provided by above-mentioned technical proposal, compared with prior art,
Beneficial effect includes: each critical wind velocity by the way that solar bracket is calculated, and show whether solar bracket meets and is putting
The wind loading rating of seated position passes through the formula of the step 6 if the numerical value obtained can not meet the wind loading rating of placement location
The mass M and friction coefficient μ close ties of each critical wind velocity and solar bracket can be obtained, by adjusting solar bracket
Quality and coefficient of friction, from the new critical wind velocity for calculating solar bracket, if critical wind velocity meets the wind resistance of placement location
It is required that then this solar bracket meets the requirements, data requirements needed for complete design；Or passed through according to the formula of the step 7
It obtains the fixed wind pressure of the maximum of placement location, calculates solar bracket and realize stable minimum quality, according to different realities
The sun bracket of border situation selection different sizes.
Detailed description of the invention
Fig. 1 is test model dimension data table of the invention；
Fig. 2 is the average force coefficient box haul angle result of variations with the wind of various operating conditions of the invention；
Fig. 3 is the average beam wind force coefficient box haul angle result of variations of the various operating conditions of the present invention
Fig. 4 is the average vertical force coefficient box haul angle result of variations of various operating conditions of the invention；
Fig. 5 is that being averaged for various operating conditions of the invention waves torque coefficient box haul angle result of variations；
Fig. 6 is the average pitching moment coefficient box haul angle result of variations of various operating conditions of the invention；
Fig. 7 is the average deflection torque coefficient box haul angle result of variations of various operating conditions of the invention；
Fig. 8 is that Critical Stability speed analyzes result under each wind angle of Model-1 of the invention；
Critical Stability speed analyzes result under each wind angle of Model-2 Fig. 9 of the invention；
Critical Stability speed analyzes result under each wind angle of Model-3 Figure 10 of the invention；
Critical Stability speed analyzes result under each wind angle of Model-4 Figure 11 of the invention；
Figure 12 four kinds of models of present invention minimum critical wind speed under various operating conditions.
Specific embodiment
With reference to embodiment, the embodiment of the present invention is furthur described in detail.Following embodiment is used for
Illustrate the present invention, but is not intended to limit the scope of the invention.
A kind of design method of wind-resistance solar board mount provided by the present invention comprising following steps: it step 1: surveys
The mass M for measuring solar bracket, with reference to projected area As, reference length L, reference width B, reference altitude H and static friction
Coefficient μ；Step 2: according to the system of wind axes under wind tunnel test obtain solar bracket suffered by Average aerodynamic power with the windAverage aerodynamic sidewind forceAnd Average aerodynamic vertical forceStep 3: according to the wind axis under wind tunnel test
Coordinate system show that Average aerodynamic suffered by solar bracket waves torqueAverage aerodynamic pitching momentPeace
Pneumatic deflection torqueStep 4: it according to the numerical value of step 1 and step 2, calculates solar bracket and exists respectively
Average aerodynamic under system of wind axes force coefficient C with the windd, Average aerodynamic beam wind force coefficient ClWith the vertical force coefficient C of Average aerodynamicz；Step
Rapid five: according to the numerical value of step 1 and step 3, calculating solar bracket Average aerodynamic waves under system of wind axes respectively
Torque coefficient Cmh, Average aerodynamic pitching moment coefficient CmvWith Average aerodynamic deflection torque coefficient Cmz；Step 6: extremely according to step 1
The numerical value that step 5 is calculated finds out sideslip critical wind velocity Us, turn on one's side critical wind velocity Umh, start critical wind velocity Umv, deflection critical
Wind velocity Umz；The calculation formula of the sideslip critical wind velocity is
It is described rollover critical wind velocity calculation formula beIt is described start it is critical
The calculation formula of wind speed isThe deflection critical wind speed
Calculation formula isThe KsIt is steady to break away
Determine coefficient, KmhFor the coefficient of stability, K of turning on one's sidemvTo start the coefficient of stability and KmzFor yaw stabilization coefficient；Step 7: in known wind pressure
Under, it is rewritten, can be obtained critical when solar bracket keeps stablizing according to each critical wind velocity calculation formula of step 6
Quality；Sideslip minimum mass:Rollover critical mass:Start critical mass: Deflection critical quality: Show that solar bracket can reach according to above-mentioned formula
Various situations stablize required minimum mass.
Solar bracket is obtained by the way that each critical wind velocity of solar bracket is calculated based on above-mentioned technical characteristic
Whether wind loading rating in placement location is met, if the numerical value obtained can not meet the wind loading rating of placement location, by described
The formula of step 6 can obtain the mass M and friction coefficient μ close ties of each critical wind velocity and solar bracket, pass through tune
The quality and coefficient of friction of whole solar bracket are put from the new critical wind velocity for calculating solar bracket if critical wind velocity meets
The wind resistance requirement of seated position, then this solar bracket meets the requirements, data requirements needed for complete design；Or according to the step
Seven formula calculates solar bracket and realizes stable minimum quality by the fixed wind pressure of the maximum for obtaining placement location, with
According to the sun bracket of different actual conditions selection different sizes designs, wherein the coefficient of stability can take according to different situations
Value is 1 or 1.5, convenient for the calculating in later period.
Further, by the step 6 and the step 7 it is found that when changing friction coefficient μ (for example, by using not
With material change friction coefficient, and or increase coefficient to adhere agent), it can be deduced that different Critical Stability wind speed and critical
Quality results；Therefore the wind loading rating of friction coefficient μ and solar bracket plays close contact；The similarly matter of solar bracket
Amount M also plays its wind loading rating closely related connection.Therefore the different Critical Stabilities by meeting needed for different situations
Wind speed or critical mass can meet required stability requirement by designing various sizes of solar bracket.
In the step 3,The CfF=d, l, z；Wind axis is calculated separately out by this formula to sit
Mark is the lower Average aerodynamic pneumatic vertical force coefficient of force coefficient, Average aerodynamic beam wind force coefficient peace with the wind.
In the step 4,The CmfMf=mh, mv, mz；It is calculated separately by this formula
Average aerodynamic waves torque coefficient, Average aerodynamic pitching moment coefficient and Average aerodynamic deflection torque system under system of wind axes out
Number.
The numerical value of gravity acceleration g in the step 5 is 9.81m/s2。
It, can be in the parameter of known critical mass and critical wind velocity according to the formula of the step 6 and/or the step 7
In the case of, the dimensional parameters demand of solar bracket can be inversely designed, such as the mass M of solar bracket, with reference to projected area
As, reference length L, reference width B, reference altitude H and confficient of static friction μ etc. related needs
Wherein, the numerical value of atmospheric density ρ carries out value according to the actual conditions of varying environment.
To sum up, it is proved by tetra- group model wind tunnel test of Model-1, Model-2, Model-3 and Model-4,
The size of four group models is as shown in Fig. 1, give same parameters dimensionless for convenience in comparing, in this test as a result,
I.e. with reference to projected area and model reference width using Model-1 as calculation basis, value is as follows respectively: As=0.464m2, B
=0.452m.The model Average aerodynamic force coefficient test result of four kinds of operating conditions is as shown in attached drawing 2-7.
It must state, this test objective is only to be carried out proving the design method, the design method with above-mentioned four group model
It is not limited in four group models of this test.
From figure 2 it can be seen that the average variation of force coefficient box haul angle with the wind of Model-1 is less, Model-2,
The average force coefficient box haul angle with the wind Model-3 and Model-4 changes greatly, meet Model-3 > Model-2 > Model-4 >
Model-1.In addition, the seamed and seamless test result of comparison it can be found that Model-1 and Model-2 test result difference
Less, and the test result difference of Model-3 and Model-4 is larger, this show solar panels have certain inclination angle when, crack
It is had not significant impact when having a certain impact, and being horizontally arranged to the power with the wind of device of solar generating.
From figure 3, it can be seen that the average beam wind force coefficient box haul angle variation of Model-1 is less, Model-2,
The beam wind force coefficient box haul angle that is averaged Model-3 and Model-4 changes greatly, meet Model-3 > Model-2 > Model-4 >
Model-1.In addition, the seamed and seamless test result of comparison it can be found that Model-1 and Model-2 test result difference
Less, and the test result difference of Model-3 and Model-4 is larger, this show solar panels have certain inclination angle when, crack
It is had not significant impact when having a certain impact, and being horizontally arranged to the sidewind force of device of solar generating.
The vertical force coefficient box haul figure 4, it is seen that Model-1, Model-2, Model-3 and Model-4 are averaged
Angle changes greatly, and meets Model-3 > Model-4 > Model-2 > Model-1, and the average vertical force coefficient of all models is equal
Less than 0, this shows that device of solar generating shows as vertical pressure under wind action, this is beneficial to solar power generation dress
The stabilization set.In addition, comparing seamed and seamless test result it can be found that when cracking positioned at upstream under corresponding wind angle
The test result difference of Model-1, Model-2, Model-3 and Model-4 are more obvious, and while cracking positioned at downstream is corresponding
The average vertical force coefficient of all models is without significant difference under wind angle.This shows when cracking positioned at upstream, to too
The vertical force of positive energy power generator has a certain impact, and when cracking positioned at downstream, to the vertical of device of solar generating
Power has not significant impact.Also, when cracking positioned at upstream, seamless average vertical force coefficient is greater than seamed average vertical force
Coefficient, that is, the vertical pressure that cracking is reduce, and are unfavorable for the stabilization of device of solar generating.
From figure 5 it can be seen that being averaged for Model-1 waves the variation of torque coefficient box haul angle less, Model-2,
Model-3 and Model-4 averagely waves torque coefficient box haul angle and changes greatly, meet Model-3 > Model-2 > Model-4 >
Model-1.In addition, the seamed and seamless test result of comparison it can be found that Model-1 and Model-2 test result difference
Less, and the test result difference of Model-3 and Model-4 is larger, this show solar panels have certain inclination angle when, crack
It is had not significant impact when having a certain impact, and being horizontally arranged to the torque of waving of device of solar generating.It is worth noting that,
Model-3 and Model-4 also only cracks and has a significant effect positioned at upstream and the corresponding wind angle of portion downstream, and crack so that
It averagely waves torque coefficient to become larger, is unfavorable for the stabilization of device of solar generating.
From fig. 6 it can be seen that Model-1, Model-2, Model-3 and Model-4 are averaged, pitching moment coefficient is with the wind
It is changed greatly to angle, meets Model-3 > Model-2 > Model-1 > Model-4.In addition, the test that comparison is seamed and seamless
As a result it can be found that the test result difference of Model-1 and Model-2 is little, and the test result of Model-3 and Model-4
Difference is larger, and when this shows that solar panels have certain inclination angle, cracking has centainly the pitching moment of device of solar generating
Influence, and it is horizontal positioned when have not significant impact.And only corresponding wind angle has shadow to Model-3 when cracking positioned at downstream
It rings, Model-4 is that all wind angles have a significant effect, and cracks so that average pitching moment coefficient becomes smaller, and is conducive to the sun
The stabilization of energy power generator.
Generally, for average air power performance perspective, Model-1 is better than Model-2, and Model-4 is better than Model-
3, and the aerodynamic coefficient of Model-1 and aerodynamic moment coefficient are minimum, belong to aerodynamic force optimal case, Model-1 cracks pair
Its aerodynamic influence is little.But in view of average vertical force is conducive to the stabilization of device of solar generating, whether Model-1 is too
The stable optimal case of positive energy power generator is to be further analyzed.
Refering to attached drawing 8-12, by the step 6, μ takes 0.6, and the coefficient of stability takes 1.5, can analyze facing for four group models
Boundary's air speed data, as can be seen that Model-1 is seamless stablizes optimal to break away, it is steady to start that Model-3 is seamless for summarized results comparison
Fixed optimal, seamless to stablize optimal to start, Model-2 is seamed optimal for yaw stabilization, and aerodynamic force is advantageous under various operating conditions
Stablize in rollover.It is appreciated that sideslip critical wind velocity is below 200 kilometers/hour under other operating conditions in addition to Model-1
(corresponding wind speed 55.6m/s, slightly above specification given 1.82kPa when corresponding wind speed when i.e. fundamental wind pressure is 1.89kPa).
Comprehensively consider, when break away can by other schemes solve when Model-2 it is seamless for charming appearance and behaviour stablize it is optimal.
It can thus be concluded that the quality and coefficient of friction of solar bracket have closely critical wind velocity and critical mass
Connection, conclusive effect is played for the wind loading rating of solar bracket.
In the description of the present invention, it should be noted that term " center ", " longitudinal direction ", " transverse direction ", "upper", "lower",
The orientation or positional relationship of the instructions such as "front", "rear", "left", "right", "vertical", "horizontal", "top", "bottom" "inner", "outside" is
It is based on the orientation or positional relationship shown in the drawings, is merely for convenience of description of the present invention and simplification of the description, rather than instruction or dark
Show that signified device or element must have a particular orientation, be constructed and operated in a specific orientation, therefore should not be understood as pair
Limitation of the invention.In addition, term " first ", " second ", " third " are used for description purposes only, and it should not be understood as instruction or dark
Show relative importance.
In the description of the present invention, it should be noted that unless otherwise clearly defined and limited, term " installation ", " phase
Even ", " connection " shall be understood in a broad sense, for example, it may be being fixedly connected, may be a detachable connection, or be integrally connected；It can
To be mechanical connection, it is also possible to be electrically connected；It can be directly connected, can also can be indirectly connected through an intermediary
Connection inside two elements.For the ordinary skill in the art, above-mentioned term can be understood at this with concrete condition
Concrete meaning in invention.
In addition, in the description of the present invention, unless otherwise indicated, the meaning of " plurality " is two or more.
The above is only the preferred embodiment of the present invention, it is noted that those skilled in the art are come
It says, without departing from the technical principles of the invention, several improvement and replacement can also be made, these are improved and replacement is also answered
It is considered as protection scope of the present invention.
Claims (6)
1. a kind of design method of wind-resistance solar board mount, which is characterized in that it includes the following steps:
Step 1: measuring the mass M of solar bracket, with reference to projected area As, reference length L, reference width B, with reference to height
Spend H and confficient of static friction μ；
Step 2: according to the system of wind axes under wind tunnel test obtain solar bracket suffered by Average aerodynamic power with the windIt is flat
Pneumatic sidewind forceAnd Average aerodynamic vertical force
Step 3: according to the system of wind axes under wind tunnel test obtain solar bracket suffered by Average aerodynamic wave torqueAverage aerodynamic pitching momentWith Average aerodynamic deflection torque
Step 4: according to the numerical value of step 1 and step 2, solar bracket being averaged under system of wind axes respectively is calculated
Pneumatic force coefficient C with the windd, Average aerodynamic beam wind force coefficient ClWith the vertical force coefficient C of Average aerodynamicz；
Step 5: it according to the numerical value of step 1 and step 3, calculates solar bracket and is being averaged under system of wind axes respectively
Pneumatic rocking torque coefficient Cmh, Average aerodynamic pitching moment coefficient CmvWith Average aerodynamic deflection torque coefficient Cmz；
Step 6: the numerical value calculated according to step 1 to step 5 finds out sideslip critical wind velocity Us, critical wind velocity of turning on one's side
Umh, start critical wind velocity Umv, deflection critical wind velocity Umz；
The calculation formula of the sideslip critical wind velocity is
It is described rollover critical wind velocity calculation formula be
The calculation formula for starting critical wind velocity is
The calculation formula of the deflection critical wind speed is
The KsFor the sideslip coefficient of stability, KmhFor the coefficient of stability, K of turning on one's sidemvTo start the coefficient of stability and KmzFor yaw stabilization coefficient；
Step 7: it under known wind pressure, is rewritten according to each critical wind velocity calculation formula of step 6, can obtain solar energy
Bracket keeps critical mass when stablizing；
Sideslip minimum mass:
Rollover critical mass:
Start critical mass:
Deflection critical quality:
Show that solar bracket can reach various situations and stablize required minimum mass according to above-mentioned formula.
2. the design method of wind-resistance solar board mount as described in claim 1, which is characterized in that in the step 3,The CfF=d, l, z.
3. the design method of wind-resistance solar board mount as described in claim 1, which is characterized in that in the step 4,The CmfMf=mh, mv, mz.
4. the design method of wind-resistance solar board mount as described in claim 1, which is characterized in that in the step 6, root
Change according to its critical wind velocity formula, it is known that the critical mass of solar bracket is calculated under wind pressure.
5. the design method of wind-resistance solar board mount as described in claim 1, which is characterized in that the weight in the step 5
The numerical value of power acceleration g is 9.81m/s2。
6. the design method of wind-resistance solar board mount as described in claim 1, which is characterized in that according to the step 6
And/or the formula of the step 7, the sun can be inversely designed in known critical mass and the parameter of critical wind velocity
The dimensional parameters demand of energy bracket.
Priority Applications (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201810932590.XA CN109271669A (en) | 2018-08-16 | 2018-08-16 | A kind of design method of wind-resistance solar board mount |
| KR1020190093831A KR20200020592A (en) | 2018-08-16 | 2019-08-01 | Design method of wind-resistant solar panel bracket |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201810932590.XA CN109271669A (en) | 2018-08-16 | 2018-08-16 | A kind of design method of wind-resistance solar board mount |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN109271669A true CN109271669A (en) | 2019-01-25 |
Family
ID=65153811
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201810932590.XA Pending CN109271669A (en) | 2018-08-16 | 2018-08-16 | A kind of design method of wind-resistance solar board mount |
Country Status (2)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| KR (1) | KR20200020592A (en) |
| CN (1) | CN109271669A (en) |
Citations (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP2003242187A (en) * | 2001-12-13 | 2003-08-29 | Kyocera Corp | Component combining method for solar power generation device, and computer system and program using the same method |
| US20110089692A1 (en) * | 2006-10-18 | 2011-04-21 | Boralex Inc. | System and Method for Controlling a Wind Turbine |
-
2018
- 2018-08-16 CN CN201810932590.XA patent/CN109271669A/en active Pending
-
2019
- 2019-08-01 KR KR1020190093831A patent/KR20200020592A/en unknown
Patent Citations (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP2003242187A (en) * | 2001-12-13 | 2003-08-29 | Kyocera Corp | Component combining method for solar power generation device, and computer system and program using the same method |
| US20110089692A1 (en) * | 2006-10-18 | 2011-04-21 | Boralex Inc. | System and Method for Controlling a Wind Turbine |
Non-Patent Citations (4)
| Title |
|---|
| 刘春雨等: "太阳能板支架体系等效静力风荷载响应分析", 《山西建筑》 * |
| 吕宏伟 等: "太阳能光伏支架结构风载取值分析", 《西北水电》 * |
| 张庆祝: "太阳能光伏组件风载负荷计算及支架结构的研究", 《中国优秀硕士学位论文全文数据库工程科技II辑》 * |
| 杨涛 等: "基于有限元法的太阳能光伏支架结构设计与优化", 《吉林化工学院学报》 * |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| KR20200020592A (en) | 2020-02-26 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN104236504B (en) | A kind of transmission line of electricity equivalence ice covering thickness monitoring method | |
| JP6818052B2 (en) | Wind generation means and wind test facility equipped with this | |
| KR20190088998A (en) | Control System for Floating Wind Turbine Structures | |
| CN106596040A (en) | Marine environment load simulating method | |
| CN113255067B (en) | Rotor icing ice shape calculation method considering flapping effect, storage medium and terminal | |
| CN105335617B (en) | Method and device for evaluating wake effect of wind power plant | |
| Mendoza et al. | Wake flow simulation of a vertical axis wind turbine under the influence of wind shear | |
| Matoug et al. | An hybrid approach for the comparison of VAWT and HAWT performances for floating offshore wind turbines | |
| CN109271669A (en) | A kind of design method of wind-resistance solar board mount | |
| JP2005061963A (en) | Horizontal-axis windmill and blow-up angle measuring method | |
| Machielse et al. | ECN test farm measurements for validation of wake models | |
| Pankonien et al. | 3d-printed wind tunnel flutter model | |
| Boorsma et al. | New MEXICO experiment | |
| CN109446573A (en) | A method of building multidimensional road surface simulation model | |
| CN114608795B (en) | Method for determining resonance boundary of wind tunnel system for airplane blowing test | |
| Demartino et al. | Experimental study of the effect of icing on the aerodynamics of circular cylinders-Part II: Inclined flow | |
| CN110489867A (en) | A kind of contamination accumulation characteristics analysis method of anti-snow slush composite insulator | |
| Poland | Modelling aeroelastic deformation of soft wing membrane kites | |
| CN105893743A (en) | Transmission line standard ice thickness calculation method based on meteorological station | |
| CN110826153B (en) | Water acting force simulation and realization method applied to helicopter water stability calculation | |
| Samson et al. | Shroud design criteria for a lighter than air Wind Energy System | |
| CN210037859U (en) | Wind measuring device based on light spot displacement | |
| CN110516328A (en) | A method of establishing wind turbine power output simulation model | |
| Xiangming et al. | Experimental study of the aerodynamics of sail in natural wind | |
| Lobriglio et al. | Uncertainty quantification of aerodynamic and aeroelastic responses of a short-gap twin-box deck depending on the wind angle of attack |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| AD01 | Patent right deemed abandoned |
Effective date of abandoning: 20231208 |
|
| AD01 | Patent right deemed abandoned |