CN109270560B - Multi-dimensional gross error positioning and value fixing method for area elevation abnormal data - Google Patents
Multi-dimensional gross error positioning and value fixing method for area elevation abnormal data Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN109270560B CN109270560B CN201811187757.0A CN201811187757A CN109270560B CN 109270560 B CN109270560 B CN 109270560B CN 201811187757 A CN201811187757 A CN 201811187757A CN 109270560 B CN109270560 B CN 109270560B
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- formula
- point
- value
- ith
- elevation
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01S—RADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
- G01S19/00—Satellite radio beacon positioning systems; Determining position, velocity or attitude using signals transmitted by such systems
- G01S19/38—Determining a navigation solution using signals transmitted by a satellite radio beacon positioning system
- G01S19/39—Determining a navigation solution using signals transmitted by a satellite radio beacon positioning system the satellite radio beacon positioning system transmitting time-stamped messages, e.g. GPS [Global Positioning System], GLONASS [Global Orbiting Navigation Satellite System] or GALILEO
- G01S19/40—Correcting position, velocity or attitude
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01S—RADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
- G01S19/00—Satellite radio beacon positioning systems; Determining position, velocity or attitude using signals transmitted by such systems
- G01S19/38—Determining a navigation solution using signals transmitted by a satellite radio beacon positioning system
- G01S19/39—Determining a navigation solution using signals transmitted by a satellite radio beacon positioning system the satellite radio beacon positioning system transmitting time-stamped messages, e.g. GPS [Global Positioning System], GLONASS [Global Orbiting Navigation Satellite System] or GALILEO
- G01S19/42—Determining position
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Radar, Positioning & Navigation (AREA)
- Remote Sensing (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Position Fixing By Use Of Radio Waves (AREA)
Abstract
The invention discloses a multi-dimensional gross error positioning and value fixing method for regional elevation abnormal data, which organically combines the dimensional, positioning and value fixing according to a specified flow, and has accurate and efficient gross error positioning. Through analysis of results of a large number of example applications, when the coarse difference dimension reaches 1/6 of a total sample, and the maximum value of the coarse difference reaches 6 times of the medium error, the coarse difference can still be accurately positioned. Because the coarse difference value is obtained while the multi-dimensional coarse difference positioning is carried out, the invention has more flexible processing on the elevation abnormal value containing the coarse difference value, and particularly when the number of the control points is close to 3 times that of the parameters to be estimated.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to the field of geodetic surveying, in particular to a multi-dimensional gross error positioning and value-fixing method for area elevation abnormal data.
Background
An area is a portion of the surface of the earth and an elevation anomaly is the difference between the earth's ellipsoid and the earth's quasi-geoid. Determining regional elevation anomalies is one of the key tasks in geodetic and engineering tasks. Currently, there are two main calculation methods for determining the area elevation anomaly: (1) gravity is like the calculation of the geodetic level. The elevation abnormity is determined according to the Molokinsky theory, and a two-time removal-recovery technical method is generally adopted in the calculation process. But the precision is lower, and the engineering requirement is difficult to meet. (2) And calculating the elevation anomaly by using the GPS level. The method is to obtain the GPS geodetic height and the precise level normal height of the point on the same point, the difference value of the GPS geodetic height and the precise level normal height is the elevation abnormity of the point, and the precision is higher than that of the first method. Moreover, if enough GPS level points are distributed in an area, an elevation anomaly calculation model of the area can be established by calculating elevation anomaly values of the points. The method (2) is a commonly used method for determining the elevation abnormality of the area (provincial and urban level). The accuracy of the elevation anomaly model depends on the data quality of elevation anomaly values, namely whether the elevation anomaly values contain gross errors or not, in addition to the accuracy of GPS geodetic determination and the accuracy of leveling measurement. If the gross error cannot be located and valued effectively (for correcting the gross error), it will have a serious impact on the estimation result of the parameters. The rough difference detection, positioning and setting of the elevation abnormal values are the premise for establishing an effective elevation abnormal model.
There are various methods for gross error testing, including the Bayes method; a green estimation-based gross error detection method; a standard detection method is simulated; a plurality of gross errors detection method based on variance expansion model; and distinguishing the multi-dimensional gross errors by applying a partial correlation coefficient, and carrying out overall significance detection and positioning on the multi-dimensional gross errors by using a complex correlation coefficient. In general, multi-dimensional gross error detection and localization are difficult, mainly the dimensionality of the gross error is difficult to determine. Although the one-dimensional gross error detection method is simple and feasible, the correlation of the gross error on the residual error cannot be considered, and the existence of a plurality of gross errors is judged successively by the method, so that the possibility of error judgment is high; when a plurality of gross errors are determined simultaneously by using a heuristic method, the combination number of the heuristic method is quite large and is difficult to realize when the data is more.
Disclosure of Invention
The purpose of the invention is as follows: the invention aims to provide a multi-dimensional gross error positioning and value fixing method for area elevation abnormal data, which can accurately position gross errors.
The technical scheme is as follows: in order to achieve the purpose, the invention adopts the following technical scheme:
the invention relates to a multi-dimensional gross error positioning and value fixing method for elevation abnormal data of an area, which comprises the following steps:
s1: obtaining elevation abnormal values of n GPS points to establish a model as follows:
in the formula (1), LiIs the elevation anomaly value of the ith GPS point, Li=HGi-H0i,HGiGeodetic height, H, for the ith GPS point0iNormal high for the ith GPS point, i ═ 1, …, n; xjJ is 0, 1, …, 5, which is the undetermined parameter of the quadric surface model; x is the ordinate of the GPS point on the Gaussian plane, and y is the abscissa of the GPS point on the Gaussian plane;
writing equation (1) in matrix form:
L=AX+Δ (2)
in the formula (2), the reaction mixture is,is an elevation outlier vector;is a parameter vector to be determined;is a matrix of coefficients for the unknown parameters,is a random error vector;
s2: obtaining a least squares estimate of X according to equation (3)Obtaining the Unit weight variance according to equation (4)Least squares estimation of
Wherein N is ATPA and P are weight arrays; v is the least square estimation of the random error vector, obtained according to equation (5);
in formula (5), H ═ A (A)TPA)-1ATP;
S3: obtaining Δ t (i) according to formula (6):
ΔT(i)=T(i)-Ta (6)
in the formula (6), T (i) is the influence function statistic of the ith GPS point, TaIs the arithmetic mean of T (1), …, T (n), obtained according to formula (7), TaObtained according to formula (8);
in the formula (7), the reaction mixture is,performing least square estimation of regression X from the remaining n-1 groups of data after deleting the ith group of data;
strong points of influence are determined by the following method: when the delta T (i) is more than 0, the ith point is a strong influence point;
making the sum of the number of all strong influence points be m;
s4: step S4 specifically includes the following steps:
s4.1: the test statistic F is calculated according to equation (9):
in the formula (9), the reaction mixture is,obtained according to the formula (10),obtained according to formula (11), omega obtained according to formula (12), F(α,m,n-6-m)The method is characterized in that the method is used for testing an F quantile value with the level of alpha and the degree of freedom of (m, n-6-m);
wherein B ═ E1,E2,…,Em) Is an n multiplied by m matrix; ekIs an n × 1 vector, k is 1, …, m, where the i-th row element is 1 and the remaining elements are zero;
s4.2: gross error location was performed by the following method: judging that F is larger than FαWhether or not: if yes, judging that at least one coarse difference point exists, and performing step S4.3; otherwise, the coarse difference point does not exist, the following steps are not carried out, and the calculation is directly finished;
s4.3: obtaining test statistic F of the u strong influence point according to equation (14)u:
In the formula (14), F(α,1,n-6-m)To examine the F quantile value with level alpha and degree of freedom (1, n-6-m),is composed ofThe u-th main diagonal element of (1);
when F is presentu>FαThe u-th point is a coarse difference point;
s4.4: counting the number m of coarse difference points according to the calculation1;
S5: let B1=(E1,E2,…,E m1) Is n × m1Matrix, EhIs n × 1 vector, h is 1, …, m1Wherein the ith row element is 1 and the rest elements are zero; solving according to equation (15) to obtain a coarse difference value
s6: if m is in step S41Not equal to 0, there are two options to choose one:
the first method comprises the following steps: removing m1Data containing coarse difference points to obtain n1=n-m1Grouping the elevation abnormal values, and circulating the steps S1-S4 until no gross error points exist;
and the second method comprises the following steps: calculating the elevation abnormal value after gross error correction according to the formula (16), and circulating the steps S1-S4 until no gross error point exists;
in the formula (16), the compound represented by the formula,the elevation abnormal value of the ith GPS point after rough error correction,is the gross error value of the ith GPS point.
Has the advantages that: the invention discloses a multi-dimensional gross error positioning and value fixing method for area elevation abnormal data, which has the following beneficial effects compared with the prior art:
1) the gross error positioning is accurate and efficient; through analysis of a large number of example application results, when the coarse difference dimension reaches 1/6 of a total sample, and the maximum value of the coarse difference reaches 6 times of the medium error, the coarse difference can still be accurately positioned;
2) because the coarse difference value is obtained while the multi-dimensional coarse difference positioning is carried out, the invention has more flexible processing on the elevation abnormal value containing the coarse difference value, and particularly when the number of the control points is close to 3 times that of the parameters to be estimated.
Detailed Description
The technical solution of the present invention will be further described with reference to the following embodiments.
The specific embodiment discloses a multi-dimensional gross error positioning and value-fixing method for area elevation abnormal data, and the method of the specific embodiment is described in detail below by combining a specific engineering example.
Obtaining elevation abnormal values of n-36 GPS points to establish the following model:
in the formula (1), LiIs the elevation anomaly value of the ith GPS point, Li=HGi-H0i,HGiGeodetic height, H, for the ith GPS point0iNormal high for the ith GPS point, i ═ 1, …, n; xjJ is 0, 1, …, 5, which is the undetermined parameter of the quadric surface model; x is the ordinate of the GPS point on the Gaussian plane, and y is the abscissa of the GPS point on the Gaussian plane;
writing equation (1) in matrix form:
L=AX+Δ (2)
in the formula (2), the reaction mixture is,is an elevation outlier vector;is a parameter vector to be determined;is a matrix of coefficients for the unknown parameters,is a random error vector.
In order to obtain the elevation abnormal values of 36 GPS points, two measurement tasks, namely GPS measurement and leveling measurement, are required to be carried out on the measurement control points.
GPS measurement: according to the requirements of national measurement specifications, all control points are subjected to corresponding-grade GPS measurement to obtain the Gaussian plane coordinates (x) of each control pointi,yi) And ground height HGi。
Leveling: according to the requirements of national measurement specifications, all control points are subjected to level measurement of corresponding levels to obtain the normal height H of each control point0iAnd calculating the elevation abnormity of each control point.
In one embodiment, the area of the region is about 200km2The elevation anomaly model of (2) is used for distributing 36 measurement control points. And C-level GPS measurement and third-level leveling measurement are carried out on all control points according to the requirements of national measurement specifications, and GPS elevation abnormal values without gross errors are obtained. Now, the difference of the error of 2.5 to 6 times, specifically (0.030m, 0.035m, -0.025m, 0.040m, 0.060m, -0.040m) is applied to spots No. 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30T. Data containing gross errors are obtained as shown in table 1:
TABLE 1 GPS elevation anomaly table with gross error
S2: obtaining a least squares estimate of X according to equation (3)Obtaining the Unit weight variance according to equation (4)Least squares estimation of
Wherein N is ATPA and P are weight arrays; v is the least square estimation of the random error vector, obtained according to equation (5);
in formula (5), H ═ A (A)TPA)-1ATP;
S3: obtaining Δ t (i) according to formula (6):
ΔT(i)=T(i)-Ta (6)
in the formula (6), t (i) is the influence function statistic of the ith GPS point, as shown in table 2; t isaIs the arithmetic mean of T (1), …, T (n), obtained according to formula (7), TaObtained according to formula (8);
TABLE 2T (i) (dimensionless) TABLE
In the formula (7), the reaction mixture is,performing least square estimation of regression X from the remaining n-1 groups of data after deleting the ith group of data;
strong points of influence are determined by the following method: when the delta T (i) is more than 0, the ith point is a strong influence point; it can be seen that Δ t (i) > 0 at 1, 4, 5, 10, 15, 16, 20, 25 and 30 points, so it is a strong point of influence;
making the sum of the number of all strong influence points be m, and then m is equal to 9;
s4: step S4 specifically includes the following steps:
s4.1: the test statistic F is calculated according to equation (9):
in the formula (9), the reaction mixture is,obtained according to the formula (10),obtained according to formula (11), omega obtained according to formula (12), F(α,m,n-6-m)F quantile values with test level α ═ 0.05, degree of freedom (m, n-6-m);
wherein B ═ E1,E2,…,Em) Is an n multiplied by m matrix; ekIs an n × 1 vector, k is 1, …M, where the element in row i is 1 and the remaining elements are zero;
s4.2: gross error location was performed by the following method: judging that F is larger than FαWhether or not: if yes, judging that at least one coarse difference point exists, and performing step S4.3; otherwise, the coarse difference point does not exist, the following steps are not carried out, and the calculation is directly finished;
the positioning result is shown in table 3, and all the 6 gross error points are positioned correctly;
TABLE 3 gross error positioning results table
S4.3: obtaining test statistic F of the u strong influence point according to equation (14)u:
In the formula (14), F(α,1,n-6-m)To examine the F quantile value with level alpha and degree of freedom (1, n-6-m),is composed ofThe u-th main diagonal element of (1);
when F is presentu>FαThe u-th point is a coarse difference point;
s4.4: counting the number m of coarse difference points according to the calculation1=6;
S5: let B1=(E1,E2,…,E m1) Is n × m1Matrix, EhIs n × 1 vector, h is 1, …, m1Wherein the ith row element is 1 and the other elements areZero; solving according to equation (15) to obtain a coarse difference value
s6: if m is in step S41Not equal to 0, there are two options to choose one:
the first method comprises the following steps: removing m1Data containing coarse difference points to obtain n1=n-m1Grouping the elevation abnormal values, and circulating the steps S1-S4 until no gross error points exist;
and the second method comprises the following steps: calculating the elevation abnormal value after gross error correction according to the formula (16), and circulating the steps S1-S4 until no gross error point exists;
in the formula (16), the compound represented by the formula,the elevation abnormal value of the ith GPS point after rough error correction,the rough difference value of the ith GPS point; the coarse difference (0.0315m, 0.0358m, -0.0251m, 0.0395m, 0.0617m, -0.0375m) is obtained according to formula (16)TThe relative error of the solution is 6% at the maximum.
Claims (1)
1. The multi-dimensional gross error positioning and value fixing method for the area elevation abnormal data is characterized by comprising the following steps of: the method comprises the following steps:
s1: obtaining elevation abnormal values of n GPS points to establish a model as follows:
in the formula (1), LiIs the elevation anomaly value of the ith GPS point, Li=HGi-H0i,HGiGeodetic height, H, for the ith GPS point0iNormal high for the ith GPS point, i ═ 1, …, n; xjJ is 0, 1, …, 5, which is the undetermined parameter of the quadric surface model; x is the ordinate of the GPS point on the Gaussian plane, and y is the abscissa of the GPS point on the Gaussian plane;
writing equation (1) in matrix form:
L=AX+Δ (2)
in the formula (2), the reaction mixture is,is an elevation outlier vector;is a parameter vector to be determined;is a matrix of coefficients for the unknown parameters,is a random error vector;
s2: obtaining a least squares estimate of X according to equation (3)Obtaining the Unit weight variance according to equation (4)Least squares estimation of
Wherein N is ATPA and P are weight arrays; v is the least square estimation of the random error vector, obtained according to equation (5);
in formula (5), H ═ A (A)TPA)-1ATP;
S3: obtaining Δ t (i) according to formula (6):
ΔT(i)=T(i)-Ta (6)
in the formula (6), T (i) is the influence function statistic of the ith GPS point, TaIs the arithmetic mean of T (1), …, T (n), obtained according to formula (7), TaObtained according to formula (8);
in the formula (7), the reaction mixture is,performing least square estimation of regression X from the remaining n-1 groups of data after deleting the ith group of data;
strong points of influence are determined by the following method: when the delta T (i) is more than 0, the ith point is a strong influence point;
making the sum of the number of all strong influence points be m;
s4: step S4 specifically includes the following steps:
s4.1: the test statistic F is calculated according to equation (9):
in the formula (9), the reaction mixture is,obtained according to the formula (10),obtained according to formula (11), omega obtained according to formula (12), F(α,m,n-6-m)The method is characterized in that the method is used for testing an F quantile value with the level of alpha and the degree of freedom of (m, n-6-m);
wherein B ═ E1,E2,…,Em) Is an n multiplied by m matrix; ekIs an n × 1 vector, k is 1, …, m, where the i-th row element is 1 and the remaining elements are zero;
s4.2: gross error location was performed by the following method: judging that F is larger than FαWhether or not: if yes, judging that at least one coarse difference point exists, and performing step S4.3; otherwise, the coarse difference point does not exist, the following steps are not carried out, and the calculation is directly finished;
s4.3: obtaining test statistic F of the u strong influence point according to equation (14)u:
In the formula (14), F(α,1,n-6-m)To examine the F quantile value with level alpha and degree of freedom (1, n-6-m),is composed ofThe u-th main diagonal element of (1);
when F is presentu>FαThe u-th point is a coarse difference point;
s4.4: counting the number m of coarse difference points according to the calculation1;
S5: let B1=(E1,E2,…,E m1) Is n × m1Matrix, EhIs n × 1 vector, h is 1, …, m1Wherein the ith row element is 1 and the rest elements are zero; solving according to equation (15) to obtain a coarse difference value
s6: if m is in step S41Not equal to 0, there are two options to choose one:
the first method comprises the following steps: removing m1Data containing coarse difference points to obtain n1=n-m1Grouping the elevation abnormal values, and circulating the steps S1-S4 until no gross error points exist;
and the second method comprises the following steps: calculating the elevation abnormal value after gross error correction according to the formula (16), and circulating the steps S1-S4 until no gross error point exists;
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201811187757.0A CN109270560B (en) | 2018-10-12 | 2018-10-12 | Multi-dimensional gross error positioning and value fixing method for area elevation abnormal data |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201811187757.0A CN109270560B (en) | 2018-10-12 | 2018-10-12 | Multi-dimensional gross error positioning and value fixing method for area elevation abnormal data |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN109270560A CN109270560A (en) | 2019-01-25 |
CN109270560B true CN109270560B (en) | 2022-04-26 |
Family
ID=65197082
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN201811187757.0A Active CN109270560B (en) | 2018-10-12 | 2018-10-12 | Multi-dimensional gross error positioning and value fixing method for area elevation abnormal data |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN109270560B (en) |
Families Citing this family (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN117557741A (en) * | 2024-01-10 | 2024-02-13 | 武汉大学 | Elevation anomaly model construction method and system based on terrain model matching |
Family Cites Families (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN1244654A (en) * | 1998-08-10 | 2000-02-16 | 中国科学院测量与地球物理研究所 | Quasi-accrate detection approach for measurement coarse error |
GB0201192D0 (en) * | 2002-01-19 | 2002-03-06 | Ugcs Ltd | Method for the reduction of errors in raw measured data related to predefined data |
CN104807442B (en) * | 2015-02-06 | 2017-04-05 | 东南大学 | A kind of automatic multidimensional Detection of Gross Errors method |
CN104776827B (en) * | 2015-04-03 | 2017-04-05 | 东南大学 | The Detection of Gross Errors method of GPS height anomaly data |
-
2018
- 2018-10-12 CN CN201811187757.0A patent/CN109270560B/en active Active
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN109270560A (en) | 2019-01-25 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN110398782B (en) | Inversion method combining gravity data and gravity gradient data regularization | |
WO2019001022A1 (en) | Structural model estimation-based joint arrangement method for strain gauge and accelerometer | |
CN106595583B (en) | RTK measurement receiver inclination measurement method | |
CN107870001A (en) | A kind of magnetometer bearing calibration based on ellipsoid fitting | |
CN104776827B (en) | The Detection of Gross Errors method of GPS height anomaly data | |
CN112329349B (en) | Slope reliability assessment method | |
CN109270560B (en) | Multi-dimensional gross error positioning and value fixing method for area elevation abnormal data | |
CN104729481A (en) | Cooperative target pose precision measurement method based on PNP perspective model | |
CN109188481A (en) | A kind of new method being fitted GPS height anomaly | |
CN104102836A (en) | Method for quickly estimating robust state of power system | |
CN109521444B (en) | Self-adaptive least square fitting estimation algorithm for GPS horizontal velocity field of crustal movement | |
CN107422342A (en) | GNSS satellite clock correction estimates method of quality control in real time | |
CN112361977A (en) | Linear distance measuring method based on weight distribution | |
US10579756B2 (en) | Simulation method of surface water flow movement process in surface irrigation | |
CN106556877A (en) | A kind of earth magnetism Tonghua method and device | |
CN105424013A (en) | Measuring method of ground coordinates | |
CN105204047A (en) | Detection and repair method for single gross error of observed quantity in satellite navigation system | |
CN112131752B (en) | Super-collapse pollution rate tolerance estimation algorithm based on quasi-calibration | |
CN113884054B (en) | Tower displacement settlement monitoring method and system | |
CN113916181B (en) | Data processing method of surface-internal integrated deformation monitoring device | |
CN109375247A (en) | A kind of satellite navigation locating method and system | |
CN109406327A (en) | A kind of evaluation of uncertainty in measurement method of impact force traceability system | |
CN104807442B (en) | A kind of automatic multidimensional Detection of Gross Errors method | |
CN112255647A (en) | Optimization method for trajectory measurement information post fusion processing | |
CN103926561B (en) | A kind of parameter estimation weights method for designing eliminated for the singular value of ultra-short baseline alignment error calibration |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PB01 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
GR01 | Patent grant |