CN109255182A - A kind of hard brittle material technology-parameter predictive model and its Multipurpose Optimal Method - Google Patents
A kind of hard brittle material technology-parameter predictive model and its Multipurpose Optimal Method Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN109255182A CN109255182A CN201811047325.XA CN201811047325A CN109255182A CN 109255182 A CN109255182 A CN 109255182A CN 201811047325 A CN201811047325 A CN 201811047325A CN 109255182 A CN109255182 A CN 109255182A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- model
- factor
- parameter
- optimal
- brittle material
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F30/00—Computer-aided design [CAD]
- G06F30/20—Design optimisation, verification or simulation
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F30/00—Computer-aided design [CAD]
- G06F30/10—Geometric CAD
- G06F30/17—Mechanical parametric or variational design
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F2111/00—Details relating to CAD techniques
- G06F2111/06—Multi-objective optimisation, e.g. Pareto optimisation using simulated annealing [SA], ant colony algorithms or genetic algorithms [GA]
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Geometry (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
- Computational Mathematics (AREA)
- Mathematical Analysis (AREA)
- Mathematical Optimization (AREA)
- Pure & Applied Mathematics (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
The invention discloses a kind of hard brittle material technology-parameter predictive model and its Multipurpose Optimal Method, include the following steps: that 1) root is according to Preston equationIt is determining multifactor to be tested;2) single goal sensitivity is ranked up under single factor by Responds Surface Methodology and variance analysis, reasonable single-factor variable increment is individually determined by sensitivity and distributes;3) according to gray theory, based on degree of association convergence principle, number, grey derivative, grey differential equation are generated to model GM (0, N) and the multifactor single-goal function modeling of GM (1, N) model progress;4) 3 steps are repeated, establish other target function models, the present invention is in the case where the New Super-precision that the hard brittle material of gradient function abrasive disk uniformly removes processes background, provide a kind of hard brittle material technological parameter anticipation function model and its Multipurpose Optimal Method, more reasonable allocation factor sensitivity overcomes passing existing optimization method that can only optimize to existing result the influence degree of target.
Description
Technical field
The present invention relates to Ultraprecision Machining fields, more specifically more particularly to a kind of hard brittle material technological parameter
Prediction model and its Multipurpose Optimal Method.
Background technique
The hard brittle materials such as sapphire, YAG crystal, special cermacis, crystalline material have hardness height, fusing point high, thermostabilization
Property the good characteristics such as good and chemical property stabilization, be used widely in national defence, aerospace, industry and sphere of life.
And in the grinding and polishing process to hard brittle material, crackle, fracture belt, pit, convex often is left in wafer surface
It rises and the surface defects such as field trash, surface defect can be divided by research by following several types:
1) concave defect, i.e., to the defects of, such as groove, road plan, crackle, crow pawl, edge chipping, notch, pit and striped
Deng;
2) convex defect, i.e., outside defect, such as volcanic crater, field trash, overlap, attachment and hillock;
3) mix defect, i.e., part outward and part to the defects of, remnants and tangerine, scratch, are cut at foldings in such as annular hole
Skin etc..
As a kind of substrate material, the processing of hard brittle material substrate, grinding and polishing are with occupying very important process
Position should pay close attention to surface roughness, material removing rate, superficial lesions, residual stress, put down while focusing on processing efficiency
The technical indicators such as smooth degree (surface precision).Currently, can be used when hard brittle material is as a kind of substrate material based on gradient function
The New Super-precision processing technology that the hard brittle material of energy abrasive disk uniformly removes, the technology utilize radially elasticity modulus ladder
The gradient function polishing disk workpieces processing for spending variation is broken through since the technology belongs to emerging technology having been achieved with the relevant technologies
While, there is also some the problem of can not be ignored, for example are also easy to produce following problem in Sapphire Substrate processing:
1) generate unfilled corner, slight crack and chipping phenomenon account for sum ratio it is higher, about 5~8%;
2) unequal factor is removed with material because abrasive material is unevenly distributed, the substrate surface precision after making grinding is poor, increases
The removal amount of subsequent handling, production take time and effort, and are difficult to control, and maintenance cost is higher;
3) later grinding and polishing process in the attainable processing efficiency of institute it is lower and many after processing
For sapphire sheet since surface scratch is heavier, there is thick, deep scratch on about 20% sapphire substrate surface, need to re-grind polishing, from
And cause to do over again;
4) partially the sapphire substrate through doing over again easily occur grinding and polishing excessively and cause sapphire thickness excessively thin, generation is scrapped,
Improve the processing cost of hard brittle material substrate.
This series of problems passes through Preston equationIt is found that point of substrate and polishing disk footprint pressure
It is the important of substrate processing quality difference that material caused by cloth unevenness and the heterogeneity of relative velocity distribution, which removes non-homogeneous,
Root.Therefore sapphire this kind hard brittle material is uniformly removed in the hard brittle material based on gradient function abrasive disk new
Under type Ultraprecision Machining background, urgent need provides a kind of technology-parameter predictive model and its analyzes technological parameter, makes
It can finally reach the method for process optimization.
Summary of the invention
It is an object of the invention to solve to add in the New Super-precision that the hard brittle material of gradient function abrasive disk uniformly removes
Under work background, the problem of optimization to its working process parameter, a kind of hard brittle material technology-parameter predictive model and its more is provided
Purpose optimal method, this method are suitable for sapphire one kind hard brittle material processing technology on gradient function polishing disk and optimize.
The present invention is through the following technical solutions to achieve the above objectives: a kind of hard brittle material technology-parameter predictive model, packet
Include following steps:
Step 1: according to Preston equationΔ z in formula --- grinding removal amount, v --- abrasive grain phase
To movement velocity, the relative pressure of p --- abrasive grain, kp includes some factors relevant to abrasive grain itself, to its factor kp, p,
V is tested, and test table is established;
Step 2: mathematical method is applied into New Super-precision and processes lower technological parameter sensitivity sequence, passes through response surface
Analytic approach and variance analysis are ranked up single goal sensitivity under single factor, and reasonable single factor test is individually determined by sensitivity and becomes
Increment distribution is measured, Responds Surface Methodology and variance analysis are a kind of statistical mathematics methods, are expressed asY is receptance function in formula;β0For constant;βiβiiβijFor regression coefficient;
ε is error term;
Step 3: according to gray theory, based on degree of association convergence principle, generate number, grey derivative, grey differential equation to mostly because
Plain single goal model carries out GM (0, N) modeling and models with GM (1, N), and (the wherein number that N is factor) establishes more factor single goals
Modeling, gray theory are the mathematical modeling thought proposed for rawness, the few certain problem of data, and GM (0, N) is to establish
Static prediction model, GM (1, N) are to establish dynamic prediction model, and specific modeling method is as follows:
1, GM (0, N) model is established, the specific steps are as follows:
Step 1: carrying out x to the data that test obtainsi (0)Make 1-AGO sequence,
If x1 (0)=[x1 (0)(1),x1 (0)(2)...x1 (0)It (n)] is system features data sequence,
x2 (0)=[x2 (0)(1),x2 (0)(2)...x2 (0)(n)],
x3 (0)=[x3 (0)(1),x3 (0)(2)...x3 (0)(n)],
xN (0)=[xN (0)(1),xN (0)(2)...xN (0)(n)],
U=[a, b2...bN];
Step 2: B and Y is calculated,
Step 3: calculating μ1=(BTB)-1BTY, wherein μ1The operation coefficient obtained for matrix operation.
Step 4: establishing multifactor GM (0, N) model:
x1 (1)(k)=a+b2x2 (1)(k)+b3x3 (1)(k)+....+bNxN (1)(k);Wherein a is principal impact factor, b2b3bNFor
Regression coefficient,
2, GM (1, N) model is established, the specific steps are as follows:
Step 1: carrying out xi (0) to the data that test obtains makees 1-AGO sequence,
If x1 (0)=[x1 (0)(1),x1 (0)(2)...x1 (0)It (n)] is system features data sequence,
x2 (0)=[x2 (0)(1),x2 (0)(2)...x2 (0)(n)];
x3 (0)=[x3 (0)(1),x3 (0)(2)...x3 (0)(n)];
xN (0)=[xN (0)(1),xN (0)(2)...xN (0)(n)];
xi (1)For xi (0)1-AGO sequence, z1 (1)For x1 (1)Close to formation sequence, calculation formula isWherein-a is System Development coefficient, bixi (1)It (k) is driving item, biFor drive factor, u
=[a, b2...bN] it is that parameter arranges;
Step 2: B, Y are calculated,
Step 3: calculating μ1=(BTB)-1BTY, wherein μ1The operation coefficient obtained for matrix operation.
Step 4: establishing multifactor GM (1, N) model:
3, by GM (0, N) model and GM (1, N) model and existing test data relative error, take precision the higher person as pre-
Model is surveyed, determines multifactor single goal model prediction subsequent delta.
Step 4: repeat step 3 kind GM (0, N) model and GM (1, N) model and modeling pattern, carry out multiple monoculars
The modeling of scalar functions.
A kind of Multipurpose Optimal Method of hard brittle material technology-parameter predictive model, includes the following steps:
Step 1: hard brittle material technology-parameter predictive model is established;
Step 2: carrying out supplement orthogonal test, and orthogonal test is to seek a kind of efficiency test mode of optimum combination, this hair
There are 3 processing factors in bright, collection is combined into p={ p1,p2,p3, the horizontal L={ l of corresponding parameter 21,l2, orthogonal scheme 9
Kind, prediction factor is added and carries out orthogonal test, can also to established GM (0, N) model or GM (1, N) model prediction result into
Row verifying;
Step 3: any combination prediction of result is carried out to having multifactor parameter by effect forecast, effect forecast is established
On the basis of orthogonal test, the average level removal amount avr of factor is calculated, the horizontal l of each factor is utilizediIt is pre- that-avr carries out effect
It surveys;
Step 4: seek multiple objective function optimal solution using apart from congestion PSO particle swarm optimization algorithm, algorithm becomes in decision
Quantity space initializes a population, and the parameter of each particle is provided by effect forecast data, by multi-objective optimization question
Multiple objective function completes flight of the particle in decision variable space jointly, makes to eventually fall into non-bad optimal objective domain, decision goes out
Optimal solution writes program using MATLAB;Specific step is as follows:
Step 1: initialization population: population size N is given by effect forecast data, velocity location x is randomly generatedi,
Speed vi;
Step 2: objective function f1(x),f2(x) fitness value of each particle is calculated separately:
For i=1to N
Fitness1 [i]=f1(X[i]);
Fitness1 [i]=f1(X[i]);
Next i;
Step 3: determining the local optimum and global optimum's degree of each particle:
For i=1to N
PBest [1, i]=f1(x)
PBest [1, i]=f1(x)
Next i;
GBest [1, i]=f1(x)
GBest [1, i]=f1(x);
Step 4: speed and the position of renewal function, comparison function it is optimal optimal with itself;
Step 5: adjustment particle rapidity, judges the number of iterations, if meeting suspension condition, exits, otherwise return to step 4;
Step 6: obtaining output optimal result;
Step 5: the optimal solution obtained according to particle swarm algorithm carries out actual process examination to its optimal solution parameter kp, v, p
Verifying, when the theoretical process results and actual tests result error that algorithm obtains are less than 10%, identification algorithm solution is effectively to solve,
It and is the optimal procedure parameters of process optimization.
The beneficial effects of the present invention are: the present invention uniformly removed in the hard brittle material of gradient function abrasive disk it is novel super
Under Precision Machining background, a kind of hard brittle material technological parameter anticipation function model and its Multipurpose Optimal Method are provided, more
Reasonable allocation factor sensitivity overcomes passing existing optimization method can only be to existing result the influence degree of target
It optimizes, the present invention predicts subsequent delta as a result, compared with existing effect forecast method, by 3 groups of experiments, can predict
Subsequent multi-group data at least guarantees subsequent 2 groups of data precisions, by effect forecast method, at least obtains 243 groups of data;Reach
It does a small amount of experiment and obtains the purpose of a large amount of target factor process results;By the calculating of particle swarm algorithm to the data of technological parameter
Analysis obtains optimal optimum results;Full experiment method by establishing this set of standard technology optimization replaces artificial experience not
It is disconnected fuzzy to attempt, it can also offer reference for the processing technology of other similar hard brittle material and prioritization scheme.
Detailed description of the invention
Fig. 1 is a kind of flow diagram of the Multipurpose Optimal Method of hard brittle material technology-parameter predictive model of the present invention.
Fig. 2 is that a kind of signal population of the Multipurpose Optimal Method of hard brittle material technology-parameter predictive model of the present invention is calculated
Method is to process optimization schematic diagram.
Specific embodiment
The present invention will be further explained below with reference to the attached drawings:
As depicted in figs. 1 and 2, a kind of hard brittle material technology-parameter predictive model, includes the following steps:
Step 1: according to Preston equationΔ z in formula --- grinding removal amount, v --- abrasive grain phase
To movement velocity, the relative pressure of p --- abrasive grain, kp includes some factors relevant to abrasive grain itself, to its factor kp, p,
V is tested, and test table is established;Experimental result material removes depth write-in test table one and roughness write-in experiment table two;
Test table one
Test table two
Step 2: mathematical method is applied into New Super-precision and processes lower technological parameter sensitivity sequence, passes through response surface
Analytic approach and variance analysis are ranked up single goal sensitivity under single factor, and reasonable single factor test is individually determined by sensitivity and becomes
Increment distribution is measured, Responds Surface Methodology and variance analysis are a kind of statistical mathematics methods, are expressed asY is receptance function in formula;β0For constant;βiβiiβijFor regression coefficient;
ε is error term.
Calculated result indicates fitting material removal amount equation as follows:
Mr=0.912+2.72p-0.0113n+0.189d-2.6p2+
0.0012n2+0.0018d2+0.00129pn+0.053pd+0.1014nd;
It is fitted roughness equation:
Ra=1.028-11.55p-0.00065-0.1145d+63.41p2
+0.000012n2-0.0157d2+0.282pn+1.511pd+0.00087nd;
Single goal sensitivity is ranked up under single factor by Responds Surface Methodology and variance analysis, the result shows that p
For principal element, reasonable single-factor variable increment, distribution pressure increment is individually determined by sensitivity secondly, be finally kp in v
0.05Mpa, incremental speed 250r/min, kp increment are 1;
Step 3: according to gray theory, and this experiment uses 3 factors, based on degree of association convergence principle, generates number, ash
Derivative, grey differential equation model model GM (0,3) modeling with GM (1,3), establish more factor single goal modelings, specific modeling step
It is rapid as follows
1: x is carried out to the data that orthogonal test obtainsi (0)Make 1-AGO.
2: calculating B, YN。
3: calculating (BTB)-1。
4: parameter being asked to arrange
5: multifactor GM (0,3) model and GM (1,3) model are established,
Material removal amount GM (0,3) model is x1 (1)K=0.1917+0.074x2 (1)k-0.0008x3 (1)k+1.1103x4 (1)
K, material removal amount GM (1,3) model are x1 (1)k-0.0593z2 (1)K=0.0043x2 (1)k+0.0004x3 (1)k+0.0639x4 (1)k
Roughness GM (0,3) model is x1 (1)K=0.6052+0.0187x2 (1)k-0.0003x3 (1)k+0.2809x4 (1)K, roughness GM
(1,3) model is x1 (1)k-0.0866z2 (1)K=0.0072x2 (1)k+0.0011x3 (1)k+0.0529x4 (1)k
Prediction result filling test table one and test table two in, and with existing test data relative error, take precision higher
Person is as prediction model, and it is prediction model that one material of table removal depth, which takes GM (0,3), and two roughness of table takes GM (1,3) for prediction
Model.
A kind of Multipurpose Optimal Method of hard brittle material technology-parameter predictive model, includes the following steps:
Step 1: hard brittle material technology-parameter predictive model is established;
Step 2: carrying out supplement orthogonal test, and orthogonal test is to seek a kind of efficiency test mode of optimum combination, this hair
There are 3 processing factors in bright, collection is combined into p={ p1,p2,p3, the horizontal L={ l of corresponding parameter 21,l2, orthogonal scheme 9
Kind, prediction factor is added and carries out orthogonal test, can also to established GM (0, N) model or GM (1, N) model prediction result into
Row verifying;
Step 3: any combination prediction of result is carried out to having multifactor parameter by effect forecast, effect forecast is established
On the basis of orthogonal test, the average level removal amount avr of factor is calculated, the horizontal l of each factor is utilizediIt is pre- that-avr carries out effect
It surveys;Determine multifactor single goal model prediction subsequent delta result filling test table one and test table two, effect forecast filling examination
Table three and test table four are tested, effect forecast result there are 243 groups of data, provides local data here.
Test table three
Test table four
Step 4: seek multiple objective function optimal solution using apart from congestion PSO particle swarm optimization algorithm, algorithm becomes in decision
Quantity space initializes a population, and the parameter of each particle is provided by effect forecast data, by multi-objective optimization question
Multiple objective function completes flight of the particle in decision variable space jointly, makes to eventually fall into non-bad optimal objective domain, decision goes out
Optimal solution writes program using MATLAB;Specific step is as follows:
Step 1: initialization population: population size N is given by effect forecast data, velocity location x is randomly generatedi,
Speed vi;
Step 2: objective function f1(x),f2(x) fitness value of each particle is calculated separately:
For i=1to N
Fitness1 [i]=f1(X[i]);
Fitness1 [i]=f1(X[i]);
Next i;
Step 3: determining the local optimum and global optimum's degree of each particle:
For i=1to N
PBest [1, i]=f1(x)
PBest [1, i]=f1(x)
Next i;
GBest [1, i]=f1(x)
GBest [1, i]=f1(x);
Step 4: speed and the position of renewal function, comparison function it is optimal optimal with itself;
Step 5: adjustment particle rapidity, judges the number of iterations, if meeting suspension condition, exits, otherwise return to step 4;
Step 6: obtaining output optimal result;
Step 5: according to particle swarm algorithm obtain as a result, algorithm be finally given at pressure p be 0.15Mpa, velocity of rotation
V is 1500 turns, in the case that kp factor is 2, has convergence property, the notional result that algorithm obtains to roughness and material removal amount
Roughness is 0.2675Ra, and it is 0.4028mm that material, which removes depth,.Carry out technique actual tests, the results showed that be in pressure p
0.15Mpa, velocity of rotation v are 1500r/min, and in the case that kp factor is 2, roughness 0.2487Ra, material removes depth
For 0.3755mm, roughness deviation 7.0%, material removes depth offset 6.7%, has to sapphire this kind hard brittle material
Well processed effect.
The process optimization test data that this is determined is included in the expert system optimized specifically for skill with Optimal Parameters and is known
Know in library, to provide more accurate model further directed to process optimization.
Above-described embodiment is presently preferred embodiments of the present invention, is not a limitation on the technical scheme of the present invention, as long as
Without the technical solution that creative work can be realized on the basis of the above embodiments, it is regarded as falling into the invention patent
Rights protection scope in.
Claims (2)
1. a kind of hard brittle material technology-parameter predictive model, which comprises the steps of: step 1: according to Preston
EquationΔ z in formula --- grinding removal amount, v --- abrasive grain speed of related movement, p --- abrasive grain it is opposite
Pressure, kp include some factors relevant to abrasive grain itself, are tested to its factor kp, p, v, and test table is established;
Step 2: mathematical method is applied into New Super-precision and processes lower technological parameter sensitivity sequence, passes through response surface analysis
Method and variance analysis are ranked up single goal sensitivity under single factor, and reasonable single-factor variable is individually determined by sensitivity and increases
Amount distribution, Responds Surface Methodology and variance analysis are a kind of statistical mathematics methods, are expressed asY is receptance function in formula;β0For constant;βiβiiβijFor regression coefficient;
ε is error term;
Step 3: according to gray theory, based on degree of association convergence principle, number, grey derivative, grey differential equation are generated to multifactor list
Object module carries out GM (0, N) modeling and models with GM (1, N), establishes more factor single goal modelings, gray theory is for no warp
It tests, the mathematical modeling thought that the few certain problem of data proposes, GM (0, N) is to establish static prediction model, and GM (1, N) is to build
Vertical dynamic prediction model, specific modeling method are as follows:
1, GM (0, N) model is established, the specific steps are as follows:
Step 1: carrying out x to the data that test obtainsi (0)Make 1-AGO sequence,
If x1 (0)=[x1 (0)(1),x1 (0)(2)...x1 (0)It (n)] is system features data sequence,
x2 (0)=[x2 (0)(1),x2 (0)(2)...x2 (0)(n)],
x3 (0)=[x3 (0)(1),x3 (0)(2)...x3 (0)(n)],
xN (0)=[xN (0)(1),xN (0)(2)...xN (0)(n)],
U=[a, b2...bN];
Step 2: B and Y is calculated,
Step 3: calculating μ1=(BTB)-1BTY, wherein μ1The operation coefficient obtained for matrix operation.
Step 4: establishing multifactor GM (0, N) model:
x1 (1)(k)=a+b2x2 (1)(k)+b3x3 (1)(k)+....+bNxN (1)(k);
2, GM (1, N) model is established, the specific steps are as follows:
Step 1: carrying out xi (0) to the data that test obtains makees 1-AGO sequence,
If x1 (0)=[x1 (0)(1),x1 (0)(2)...x1 (0)It (n)] is system features data sequence,
x2 (0)=[x2 (0)(1),x2 (0)(2)...x2 (0)(n)];
x3 (0)=[x3 (0)(1),x3 (0)(2)...x3 (0)(n)];
xN (0)=[xN (0)(1),xN (0)(2)...xN (0)(n)];
xi (1)For xi (0)1-AGO sequence, z1 (1)For x1 (1)Close to formation sequence, calculation formula isIts
In-a be System Development coefficient, bixi (1)It (k) is driving item, biFor drive factor, u=[a, b2...bN] it is that parameter arranges;
Step 2: calculating B, Y, wherein μ1The operation coefficient obtained for matrix operation.
Step 3: calculating μ1=(BTB)-1BTY,
Step 4: establishing multifactor GM (1, N) model:
3, by GM (0, N) model and GM (1, N) model and existing test data relative error, take precision the higher person as prediction mould
Type determines multifactor single goal model prediction subsequent delta.
Step 4: repeat step 3 kind GM (0, N) model and GM (1, N) model and modeling pattern, carry out multiple monocular offers of tender
Several modelings.
2. a kind of Multipurpose Optimal Method of hard brittle material technology-parameter predictive model, characterized by the following steps: step
Rapid one: establishing hard brittle material technology-parameter predictive model;
Step 2: carrying out supplement orthogonal test, and orthogonal test is to seek a kind of efficiency test mode of optimum combination, in the present invention
There are 3 processing factors, collection is combined into p={ p1,p2,p3, the horizontal L={ l of corresponding parameter 21,l2, orthogonal scheme is 9 kinds,
Prediction factor is added and carries out orthogonal test, established GM (0, N) model or GM (1, N) model prediction result can also be tested
Card;
Step 3: any combination prediction of result is carried out to having multifactor parameter by effect forecast, effect forecast is established just
It hands in experimental basis, calculates the average level removal amount avr of factor, utilize the horizontal l of each factori- avr carries out effect forecast;
Step 4: seek multiple objective function optimal solution using apart from congestion PSO particle swarm optimization algorithm, algorithm is in decision variable sky
Between initialize a population, the parameter of each particle provides by effect forecast data, passes through mesh more in multi-objective optimization question
Scalar functions complete flight of the particle in decision variable space jointly, make to eventually fall into non-bad optimal objective domain, decision is optimal out
Solution, writes program using MATLAB;Specific step is as follows:
Step 1: initialization population: population size N is given by effect forecast data, velocity location x is randomly generatedi, speed
vi;
Step 2: objective function f1(x),f2(x) fitness value of each particle is calculated separately:
Step 3: determining the local optimum and global optimum's degree of each particle:
Step 4: speed and the position of renewal function, comparison function it is optimal optimal with itself;
Step 5: adjustment particle rapidity, judges the number of iterations, if meeting suspension condition, exits, otherwise return to step 4;
Step 6: obtaining output optimal result;
Step 5: the optimal solution obtained according to particle swarm algorithm carries out actual process to its optimal solution parameter kp, v, p and tests
Card, when the theoretical process results and actual tests result error that algorithm obtains are less than 10%, identification algorithm solution is effectively to solve, and be
The optimal procedure parameters of process optimization.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201811047325.XA CN109255182A (en) | 2018-09-09 | 2018-09-09 | A kind of hard brittle material technology-parameter predictive model and its Multipurpose Optimal Method |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201811047325.XA CN109255182A (en) | 2018-09-09 | 2018-09-09 | A kind of hard brittle material technology-parameter predictive model and its Multipurpose Optimal Method |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN109255182A true CN109255182A (en) | 2019-01-22 |
Family
ID=65047787
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN201811047325.XA Pending CN109255182A (en) | 2018-09-09 | 2018-09-09 | A kind of hard brittle material technology-parameter predictive model and its Multipurpose Optimal Method |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN109255182A (en) |
Cited By (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN112446087A (en) * | 2019-09-05 | 2021-03-05 | 湖南工业大学 | Mechanical structure interval multi-objective optimization method based on blind number theory |
CN113080160A (en) * | 2021-04-15 | 2021-07-09 | 河南理工大学 | Method for measuring and comparing sensitivity of fishing group system |
CN113496324A (en) * | 2020-03-20 | 2021-10-12 | 广东博智林机器人有限公司 | Spray quality prediction method, spray quality prediction device, electronic equipment and storage medium |
CN113919101A (en) * | 2021-10-29 | 2022-01-11 | 哈尔滨工业大学 | Ball head grinding wheel grinding process parameter optimization method based on response surface method and particle population optimization algorithm |
CN116341151A (en) * | 2023-05-18 | 2023-06-27 | 贵州大学 | Surface shape error control method for central symmetrical concave surface shape of large-diameter sheet part |
Citations (11)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN102867104A (en) * | 2011-09-17 | 2013-01-09 | 中国人民解放军装备指挥技术学院 | Device and method for quantitatively analyzing electromagnetic environment influence factors of electronic equipment |
CN103761429A (en) * | 2014-01-10 | 2014-04-30 | 大连理工大学 | Milling workpiece surface roughness predicting method |
CN104155914A (en) * | 2014-09-01 | 2014-11-19 | 湘潭大学 | CMP process intelligent decision making system for polishing carbide blade |
CN106501767A (en) * | 2016-10-13 | 2017-03-15 | 哈尔滨工程大学 | A kind of motion multistation passive TDOA location method |
CN106651023A (en) * | 2016-12-17 | 2017-05-10 | 三峡大学 | Grey correlation analysis-based improved fireworks algorithm mid-long term load prediction method |
CN106845729A (en) * | 2017-02-15 | 2017-06-13 | 南京航空航天大学 | A kind of electronic product rack assembly work based on gray theory determines method |
CN106891278A (en) * | 2017-01-06 | 2017-06-27 | 浙江工业大学 | A kind of preparation method with gradient function polishing disk based on Function Fitting |
CN107053027A (en) * | 2017-01-06 | 2017-08-18 | 浙江工业大学 | It is a kind of to be distributed the computational methods that abrasive disk removes function with gradient |
CN107526073A (en) * | 2017-08-22 | 2017-12-29 | 哈尔滨工程大学 | One kind motion passive TDOA-FDOA joint location method of multistation |
CN108229076A (en) * | 2018-02-12 | 2018-06-29 | 哈尔滨工业大学 | A kind of parameters of electromagnetic relay robustness global optimizing method based on response surface |
CN108489495A (en) * | 2018-03-29 | 2018-09-04 | 东南大学 | A kind of RFID tag indoor orientation method and equipment based on SVR and PSO |
-
2018
- 2018-09-09 CN CN201811047325.XA patent/CN109255182A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (11)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN102867104A (en) * | 2011-09-17 | 2013-01-09 | 中国人民解放军装备指挥技术学院 | Device and method for quantitatively analyzing electromagnetic environment influence factors of electronic equipment |
CN103761429A (en) * | 2014-01-10 | 2014-04-30 | 大连理工大学 | Milling workpiece surface roughness predicting method |
CN104155914A (en) * | 2014-09-01 | 2014-11-19 | 湘潭大学 | CMP process intelligent decision making system for polishing carbide blade |
CN106501767A (en) * | 2016-10-13 | 2017-03-15 | 哈尔滨工程大学 | A kind of motion multistation passive TDOA location method |
CN106651023A (en) * | 2016-12-17 | 2017-05-10 | 三峡大学 | Grey correlation analysis-based improved fireworks algorithm mid-long term load prediction method |
CN106891278A (en) * | 2017-01-06 | 2017-06-27 | 浙江工业大学 | A kind of preparation method with gradient function polishing disk based on Function Fitting |
CN107053027A (en) * | 2017-01-06 | 2017-08-18 | 浙江工业大学 | It is a kind of to be distributed the computational methods that abrasive disk removes function with gradient |
CN106845729A (en) * | 2017-02-15 | 2017-06-13 | 南京航空航天大学 | A kind of electronic product rack assembly work based on gray theory determines method |
CN107526073A (en) * | 2017-08-22 | 2017-12-29 | 哈尔滨工程大学 | One kind motion passive TDOA-FDOA joint location method of multistation |
CN108229076A (en) * | 2018-02-12 | 2018-06-29 | 哈尔滨工业大学 | A kind of parameters of electromagnetic relay robustness global optimizing method based on response surface |
CN108489495A (en) * | 2018-03-29 | 2018-09-04 | 东南大学 | A kind of RFID tag indoor orientation method and equipment based on SVR and PSO |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
张勇: "《GM(1,N)与GM(0,N)模型在能源消费碳排放预测中的比较研究》" * |
Cited By (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN112446087A (en) * | 2019-09-05 | 2021-03-05 | 湖南工业大学 | Mechanical structure interval multi-objective optimization method based on blind number theory |
CN112446087B (en) * | 2019-09-05 | 2022-04-29 | 湖南工业大学 | Mechanical structure interval multi-objective optimization method based on blind number theory |
CN113496324A (en) * | 2020-03-20 | 2021-10-12 | 广东博智林机器人有限公司 | Spray quality prediction method, spray quality prediction device, electronic equipment and storage medium |
CN113080160A (en) * | 2021-04-15 | 2021-07-09 | 河南理工大学 | Method for measuring and comparing sensitivity of fishing group system |
CN113080160B (en) * | 2021-04-15 | 2022-06-24 | 河南理工大学 | Method for measuring and comparing sensitivity of fishing group system |
CN113919101A (en) * | 2021-10-29 | 2022-01-11 | 哈尔滨工业大学 | Ball head grinding wheel grinding process parameter optimization method based on response surface method and particle population optimization algorithm |
CN113919101B (en) * | 2021-10-29 | 2024-04-19 | 哈尔滨工业大学 | Ball grinding wheel grinding process parameter optimization method based on response surface method and particle population optimization algorithm |
CN116341151A (en) * | 2023-05-18 | 2023-06-27 | 贵州大学 | Surface shape error control method for central symmetrical concave surface shape of large-diameter sheet part |
CN116341151B (en) * | 2023-05-18 | 2023-07-25 | 贵州大学 | Surface shape error control method for central symmetrical concave surface shape of large-diameter sheet part |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN109255182A (en) | A kind of hard brittle material technology-parameter predictive model and its Multipurpose Optimal Method | |
Cheng et al. | Deep convolutional neural network-based in-process tool condition monitoring in abrasive belt grinding | |
Bassett et al. | On the honed cutting edge and its side effects during orthogonal turning operations of AISI1045 with coated WC-Co inserts | |
Pan et al. | New insights into the methods for predicting ground surface roughness in the age of digitalisation | |
Ozturk et al. | Optimization of lapping processes of silicon wafer for photovoltaic applications | |
Brinksmeier et al. | Modelling and optimization of grinding processes | |
Wang et al. | Controlled material removal mode and depth of micro cracks in precision grinding of fused silica–A theoretical model and experimental verification | |
Chung et al. | Generation of diamond wire sliced wafer surface based on the distribution of diamond grits | |
Coppel et al. | Adaptive control optimization in micro-milling of hardened steels—evaluation of optimization approaches | |
CN107234495A (en) | Set up the method for average material removal rate forecast model and the method for predicted velocity | |
Radomska-Zalas et al. | IT support for optimisation of abrasive water cutting process using the TOPSIS method | |
CN113919101A (en) | Ball head grinding wheel grinding process parameter optimization method based on response surface method and particle population optimization algorithm | |
Botcha et al. | Process-machine interactions and a multi-sensor fusion approach to predict surface roughness in cylindrical plunge grinding process | |
de San Román et al. | Analytical-method for polishing-surface prediction considering tool flexibility and grain-material interaction | |
Alrashdan et al. | Multi-criteria end milling parameters optimization of AISI D2 steel using genetic algorithm | |
CN104331604B (en) | The method of ceramic polishing energy consumption modeling based on cellular automata | |
Ren et al. | Modeling and analysis of material removal depth contour for curved-surfaces abrasive belt grinding | |
Wang et al. | Process parameter optimization and anisotropy sensitivity study for abrasive belt grinding of nickel-based single-crystal superalloy | |
Yin et al. | The prediction model and experimental research of grinding surface roughness based on AE signal | |
Tosello et al. | Modeling and simulation of surface generation in manufacturing | |
Xiao et al. | An intelligent parameters optimization method of titanium alloy belt grinding considering machining efficiency and surface quality | |
Pan et al. | Real-time prediction of grinding surface roughness based on multi-sensor signal fusion | |
Wang et al. | Modeling surface roughness for polishing process based on abrasive cutting and probability theory | |
Xiang-min et al. | Modeling and experimenting of disc hydrodynamic polishing process for ultra-smooth surfaces | |
Zhao et al. | Ensemble learning with support vector machines algorithm for surface roughness prediction in longitudinal vibratory ultrasound-assisted grinding |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PB01 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination |