CN109190164A - Severity multi objective appraisal procedure temporarily drops in node voltage - Google Patents

Severity multi objective appraisal procedure temporarily drops in node voltage Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN109190164A
CN109190164A CN201810853644.3A CN201810853644A CN109190164A CN 109190164 A CN109190164 A CN 109190164A CN 201810853644 A CN201810853644 A CN 201810853644A CN 109190164 A CN109190164 A CN 109190164A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
index
node
follows
weight
formula
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
CN201810853644.3A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
李宇
邱方阳
陈征
刘龙
孙玉军
白杰
陈国伟
徐卫东
陶顺
范文杰
朱明星
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Guizhou Wan Feng Electric Ltd By Share Ltd
North China Electric Power University
Anhui University
Nari Technology Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Guizhou Wan Feng Electric Ltd By Share Ltd
North China Electric Power University
Anhui University
Nari Technology Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Guizhou Wan Feng Electric Ltd By Share Ltd, North China Electric Power University, Anhui University, Nari Technology Co Ltd filed Critical Guizhou Wan Feng Electric Ltd By Share Ltd
Priority to CN201810853644.3A priority Critical patent/CN109190164A/en
Publication of CN109190164A publication Critical patent/CN109190164A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F30/00Computer-aided design [CAD]
    • G06F30/20Design optimisation, verification or simulation

Abstract

The invention discloses a kind of node voltages temporarily to drop severity multi objective appraisal procedure, it chooses multiple evaluation indexes and establishes evaluation index set, the defect only considered in supply side or electricity consumption side in a certain respect in traditional evaluation method is overcome, combining both keeps assessment result more comprehensive;Meanwhile new weight is assigned for index using the combination weights method based on analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and CRITIC method, it had not only fully considered the deep layer internal association between each evaluation index, but also their relative importance can be reacted, and had kept assessment result more reasonable.By simulation results show the appraisal procedure can actual conditions in more actual response power distribution network, can accurately and effectively identify the weak node and weak section in network, lay the foundation for voltage dip improvement.

Description

Severity multi objective appraisal procedure temporarily drops in node voltage
Technical field
The present invention relates to the flat evaluation areas of the temporary precipitation of power system voltage more particularly to a kind of node voltage temporarily to drop serious journey Spend multi objective appraisal procedure.
Background technique
As the increase of sensitive load in electric system and its continuous improvement required power quality, voltage dip cause Economic loss also increase sharply, it has also become distinct issues the most in power quality.Therefore, tight to the voltage dip of power distribution network Weight degree carry out assessment be it is very necessary, it can for electric network reconstruction, device fabrication, reasonably select load access point and voltage Temporarily drop, which is administered, provides foundation.Assess the most common method of voltage dip severity first is that Monte Carlo method.
Monte Carlo Method, also known as random sampling skill or Monte Carlo method, the basic thought of this method: initially set up one A probabilistic model or random process make its parameter be equal to the solution of problem, and the system of required parameter is then calculated by sampling experiment Feature is counted, finally provides solved approximation, and provide the precision or error of solution.
Voltage dip assessment based on Monte Carlo method pays close attention to voltage dip amplitude mostly, the duration, temporarily drops energy, frequency The calculated result of inferior supply side index also has document ad hoc analysis electricity consumption side sensitive equipment to the susceptibility of voltage dip, but The two is effectively combined at present, temporarily drops the research of severity and few from for electricity consumption side assessment power distribution network node voltage.
Summary of the invention
The object of the present invention is to provide a kind of node voltages temporarily to drop severity multi objective appraisal procedure, so that assessment result More comprehensively;In addition, this method had not only fully considered the deep layer internal association between each evaluation index, but also can react Their relative importance keeps assessment result more reasonable.
The purpose of the present invention is what is be achieved through the following technical solutions:
Severity multi objective appraisal procedure temporarily drops in a kind of node voltage, comprising:
Based on matlab software, Stochastic prediction is carried out using Monte Carlo method, each node voltage temporary decline is calculated, continues Time, the frequency and sensitive equipment failure rate constitute evaluation index set;
The combination weights method based on analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and CRITIC method is used to assign again for the evaluation index set of each node Give weight;
It is flat to calculate the temporary precipitation of each node voltage by assigning the evaluation index set of each node after weight again Point, and the preceding S node of highest scoring is selected as voltage dip severity highest point;
The voltage dip sag exposed areas of this S node is sought, sag exposed areas intersection part is the weak section of whole network.
As seen from the above technical solution provided by the invention, firstly, choosing multiple evaluation indexes establishes evaluation index Set overcomes the defect only considered in supply side or electricity consumption side in a certain respect in traditional evaluation method, combines both Keep assessment result more comprehensive;Secondly, the use of the combination weights method based on analytic hierarchy process (AHP) (AHP) and CRITIC method being index tax New weight had not only fully considered the deep layer internal association between each evaluation index, but also can react the relatively heavy of them Degree is wanted, keeps assessment result more reasonable.By simulation results show the appraisal procedure can reality in more actual response power distribution network Border situation can accurately and effectively identify weak node and weak section in network, lay the foundation for voltage dip improvement.
Detailed description of the invention
In order to illustrate the technical solution of the embodiments of the present invention more clearly, required use in being described below to embodiment Attached drawing be briefly described, it should be apparent that, drawings in the following description are only some embodiments of the invention, for this For the those of ordinary skill in field, without creative efforts, it can also be obtained according to these attached drawings other Attached drawing.
Fig. 1 is the process that severity multi objective appraisal procedure temporarily drops in a kind of node voltage provided in an embodiment of the present invention Figure.
Fig. 2 is the schematic diagram of the uncertain region of sensitive equipment VTC provided in an embodiment of the present invention.
Specific embodiment
With reference to the attached drawing in the embodiment of the present invention, technical solution in the embodiment of the present invention carries out clear, complete Ground description, it is clear that described embodiments are only a part of the embodiments of the present invention, instead of all the embodiments.Based on this The embodiment of invention, every other implementation obtained by those of ordinary skill in the art without making creative efforts Example, belongs to protection scope of the present invention.
Fig. 1 is the process that severity multi objective appraisal procedure temporarily drops in a kind of node voltage provided in an embodiment of the present invention Figure, as shown in Figure 1, it is specifically included that
1, it is based on matlab software, Stochastic prediction is carried out using Monte Carlo method, each node voltage temporary decline is calculated, holds Continuous time, the frequency and sensitive equipment failure rate, constitute evaluation index set.
In the embodiment of the present invention, it is based on matlab software, each failure variable is carried out certain time using Monte Carlo method Several Stochastic predictions.Illustratively, Monte Carlo method simulated program can be write in matlab, and each failure variable is carried out 3000 sampling.
In the embodiment of the present invention, failure variable specifically include that fault type, faulty line, abort situation, fault impedance with And trouble duration.
A, fault type.
Fault type includes following four fault type: three-phase shortcircuit, single-phase short circuit, line to line fault and line to line fault connect Ground indicates with 1,2,3,4 respectively, fault type FTIt indicates are as follows:
In formula, P3L、PLWith P2LThe respectively probability that occurs of three-phase shortcircuit, single-phase short circuit and line to line fault, illustratively, on 0.06,0.65,0.19 and 0.2 can be taken respectively by stating four probability;Random number x1[0,1] is obeyed to be uniformly distributed.
B, faulty line.
The case where analog line short trouble, if line fault probability is directly proportional to line impedance virtual value, if ZLkFor kth The impedance virtual value of route, m are bus number, then in system kth route probability of malfunction are as follows:
The line number then to break down may be expressed as:
In formula, random number x2[0,1] is obeyed to be uniformly distributed;P1、P2、Pm-1Respectively indicate the 1st, 2 ... m-1 articles of line faults Rate.
C, abort situation.
Assuming that the probability that each point breaks down on route is identical, then the distance of fault point to route head end accounts for line length Percentage p obeys [0,1] and is uniformly distributed.
D, fault impedance.
Fault impedance ZfObedience desired value is μf, standard deviation σfNormal distribution, illustratively, settable μf=5 Ω, σf =1 Ω.
E, trouble duration.
Assuming that trouble duration x obeys exponential distribution, distribution function are as follows:
In formula, λ is the constant (illustrative, settable λ=1) of setting;Then trouble duration are as follows:
In formula, random number x5[0,1] is obeyed to be uniformly distributed.
Later, can according to obtained failure variate-value, carry out short circuit calculation, obtain each node voltage dip amplitude, Duration, the frequency and sensitive equipment failure rate.
Wherein, the calculation of the sensitive equipment failure rate includes:
The uncertain region of sensitive equipment VTC (voltage-vs-time tolerance curve) is rendered as a L-type region, sees negative in Fig. 2 Shadow part.UminAnd UmaxThe respectively minimum value and maximum value of sensitive equipment VTC voltage magnitude, TminAnd TmaxRespectively sensitivity is set The minimum value and maximum value of standby VTC duration.
The uncertain region sensitive equipment VTC is divided into tri- regions A, B, C;Wherein, TminAnd TmaxThe rectangle region constituted Domain B ', with UminAnd UmaxThe overlapping region of the rectangular area C ' constituted is region A;Region A is removed in region B ', region C ' Part be region B, region C.
The voltage magnitude that the duration of VTC is denoted as T, VTC in any region in these three regions is denoted as U, accordingly Probability density function is denoted as f respectivelyx(T)、fy(U), then joint probability density function are as follows:
fx,y(T, U)=fx(T)*fy(U)。
In formula, Umin< U < Umax, Tmin< T < Tmax
The normal probability model of sensitive equipment voltage-vs-time tolerance curve can be described with normal distribution:
In formula, T, U are respectively the duration of sensitive equipment VTC, voltage magnitude;fx(T)、fyIt (U) is respectively the general of T, U Rate density;
Pass through fx(T) and fy(U) joint probability density f is calculatedx,y(T, U): fx,y(T, U)=fx(T)*fy(U), then cooperate Following formula obtains sensitive equipment probability of malfunction:
2, use the combination weights method based on analytic hierarchy process (AHP) (AHP) and CRITIC method for the evaluation index set of each node Again weight is assigned.
This step better embodiment is as follows:
First calculate the basic weight of each evaluation index based on analytic hierarchy process (AHP), then by comparison basis weighted value two-by-two come Determine the element in judgment matrix.The coefficient of variation refers to the dispersion degree of one group of achievement data and the ratio of its average value, that is, marks The ratio between quasi- difference and average value, are denoted as CV.
Wherein, σjIt is the standard deviation of j-th of index, μjIt is the average value of j-th of index.
If the basic weight vectors of the Evaluation of vulnerability index set containing N number of index are as follows:
W1={ w11,w12…w1N};
In the embodiment of the present invention, evaluation index set mainly includes that voltage dip amplitude, duration, the frequency and sensitivity are set Standby failure rate namely N=4.
The then basic weight w of j-th of index1jAre as follows:
The basic weighted value of each index is compared two-by-two, calculates judgment matrix A are as follows:
Wherein,It is the basic weight w of t-th of index1tWith the basis of s-th of index Weight w1sRatio, indicate judgment matrix A in element atsValue.
In order to avoid needing to carry out consistency check to judgment matrix A due to expert's subjectivity opinion bring error as far as possible, The calculation formula of coincident indicator CI are as follows:
In formula, λmaxFor the Maximum characteristic root value of matrix A.
As CI < 0.1, which can receive;It is on the contrary then need to be modified judgment matrix A, until meeting Until condition.
Each index subjectivity weight W is normalized using by the judgment matrix A after consistency check2={ w21,w22…w2N, The wherein subjective weight w of j-th of index2j, indicate are as follows:
In formula, aijFor the basic weight w of i-th of index1iWith the basic weight w of j-th of index1jRatio.CRITIC method The process of parameter objective weight is as follows:
Correlation coefficient ρ between two indices X and YXYCalculation formula are as follows:
The calculation formula of standard deviation sigma in same index are as follows:
In formula, n is number of nodes, and for each node, each index only one value, therefore, n is also equal to together The evaluation quantity of one index;Xk、YkThe value of index X, index Y in respectively k-th of node;Respectively all n The average value of index X, index Y in node.
The information content E that j-th of index is includedjAre as follows:
In formula,For the conflicting quantized result of j-th index and other indexs;ρijFor i-th of index and j Related coefficient between index;σjFor the standard deviation of j-th of index;
It will be understood by those skilled in the art that X and Y are the code names for indicating index, i and j are the serial numbers for indicating index, because This, calculates a series of ρXYAfterwards, ρ is assured that according to the serial number of corresponding indexij
The objective weight w of j-th of index3jAre as follows:
Enable the comprehensive weight vector w of j-th of index4jAre as follows:
w4j=α w2j+βw3j
Wherein, factor alpha and β meet:
α >=0, β >=0, alpha+beta=1.
In the embodiment of the present invention, factor alpha and β can be determined using coefficient of variation method comprising:
By subjective weight vectors W2In each component { w21,w22…w2NAscending order arranges to obtain { p1,p2,...,pN, it is poor to calculate Different coefficient:
And then it obtains:
β=1- α
It will be understood by those skilled in the art that { p1,p2,...,pNIt is { w21,w22…w2NArrange from small to large as a result, p1Corresponding to { w21,w22…w2NIn the smallest element, for example, p1Likely correspond to w23
3, flat to calculate the temporary precipitation of each node voltage by assigning the evaluation index set of each node after weight again Point, and the preceding S node of highest scoring is selected as voltage dip severity highest point.
In the embodiment of the present invention, each index after nondimensionalization is multiplied to the corresponding comprehensive weight assigned again, and pass through Adduction obtains the horizontal score of voltage dip of each node, then the horizontal score of voltage dip is arranged from high to low, selects score Highest first S is used as voltage dip most serious node;S=5 illustratively can be set.
4, the voltage dip sag exposed areas of this S node is sought, sag exposed areas intersection part is the weak section of whole network.
Above scheme of the embodiment of the present invention establishes evaluation index set by choosing multiple evaluation indexes, overcomes tradition The defect in supply side or electricity consumption side in a certain respect is only considered in evaluation method, combining both keeps assessment result more complete Face;Meanwhile new weight is assigned for index using the combination weights method based on analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and CRITIC method, it had both fully considered each Deep layer internal association between a evaluation index, while their relative importance can be reacted again, make assessment result more Rationally.By simulation results show the appraisal procedure can actual conditions in more actual response power distribution network, can be accurately and effectively It identifies the weak node and weak section in network, lays the foundation for voltage dip improvement.
Through the above description of the embodiments, those skilled in the art can be understood that above-described embodiment can The mode of necessary general hardware platform can also be added to realize by software by software realization.Based on this understanding, The technical solution of above-described embodiment can be embodied in the form of software products, which can store non-easy at one In the property lost storage medium (can be CD-ROM, USB flash disk, mobile hard disk etc.), including some instructions are with so that a computer is set Standby (can be personal computer, server or the network equipment etc.) executes method described in each embodiment of the present invention.
The foregoing is only a preferred embodiment of the present invention, but scope of protection of the present invention is not limited thereto, Within the technical scope of the present disclosure, any changes or substitutions that can be easily thought of by anyone skilled in the art, It should be covered by the protection scope of the present invention.Therefore, protection scope of the present invention should be with the protection model of claims Subject to enclosing.

Claims (7)

1. severity multi objective appraisal procedure temporarily drops in a kind of node voltage characterized by comprising
Based on matlab software, Stochastic prediction is carried out using Monte Carlo method, when calculating each node voltage temporary decline, continuing Between, the frequency and sensitive equipment failure rate, constitute evaluation index set;
The combination weights method based on analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and CRITIC method is used to assign power again for the evaluation index set of each node Weight;
By assigning the evaluation index set of each node after weight again, to calculate the flat score of the temporary precipitation of each node voltage, and The preceding S node of highest scoring is selected as voltage dip severity highest point;
The voltage dip sag exposed areas of this S node is sought, sag exposed areas intersection part is the weak section of whole network.
2. severity multi objective appraisal procedure temporarily drops in a kind of node voltage according to claim 1, which is characterized in that base In matlab software, Stochastic prediction is carried out using Monte Carlo method, calculates each node voltage temporary decline, duration, the frequency With sensitive equipment failure rate, constituting evaluation index set includes:
Based on matlab software, the Stochastic prediction of certain number is carried out to each failure variable using Monte Carlo method, according to The failure variate-value arrived carries out short circuit calculation, obtains voltage dip amplitude, duration, the frequency and the sensitive equipment of each node Failure rate.
3. severity multi objective appraisal procedure temporarily drops in a kind of node voltage according to claim 2, which is characterized in that therefore Hindering variable includes: fault type, faulty line, abort situation, fault impedance and trouble duration;Wherein:
Fault type includes following four fault type: three-phase shortcircuit, single-phase short circuit, line to line fault and line to line fault are grounded, point It is not indicated with 1,2,3,4, fault type FTIt indicates are as follows:
In formula, P3L、PLWith P2LThe respectively probability that occurs of three-phase shortcircuit, single-phase short circuit and line to line fault, random number x1Obey [0, 1] it is uniformly distributed;
Faulty line: it is directly proportional to line impedance virtual value to set line fault probability, if ZLkImpedance for kth route is effective Value, m be bus number, then in system kth route probability of malfunction are as follows:
The line number then to break down may be expressed as:
In formula, random number x2[0,1] is obeyed to be uniformly distributed;P1、P2、Pm-1Respectively indicate the 1st, 2 ... m-1 articles of line failure rates;
Abort situation: assuming that the probability that each point breaks down on route is identical, then the distance of fault point to route head end the line is busy road The percentage p of length obeys [0,1] and is uniformly distributed;
Fault impedance: fault impedance ZfObedience desired value is μf, standard deviation σfNormal distribution;
Trouble duration: assuming that trouble duration x obeys exponential distribution, distribution function are as follows:
In formula, λ is the constant of setting;Then trouble duration are as follows:
In formula, random number x5[0,1] is obeyed to be uniformly distributed.
4. severity multi objective appraisal procedure, feature temporarily drop in a kind of node voltage according to claim 1 or 2 or 3 It is, the calculation of the sensitive equipment failure rate includes:
The normal probability model of sensitive equipment VTC is as follows:
In formula, T, U are respectively the duration of sensitive equipment VTC, voltage magnitude;fx(T)、fy(U) be respectively T, U probability it is close Degree;
Pass through fx(T) and fy(U) joint probability density f is calculatedx,y(T, U): fx,y(T, U)=fx(T)*fy(U), then following formula is cooperated to obtain To sensitive equipment probability of malfunction:
In formula, UminAnd UmaxThe respectively minimum value and maximum value of sensitive equipment VTC voltage magnitude, TminAnd TmaxIt is respectively sensitive The minimum value and maximum value of equipment VTC duration.
5. severity multi objective appraisal procedure temporarily drops in a kind of node voltage according to claim 1, which is characterized in that institute It states and the combination weights method based on analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and CRITIC method is used to assign weight again for the evaluation index set of each node Mode include:
The basic weight of each evaluation index is first calculated based on analytic hierarchy process (AHP): the dispersion degree for first calculating an index is flat with it The ratio of mean value, i.e. the ratio between standard deviation and average value:
Wherein, σjIt is the standard deviation of j-th of index, μjIt is the average value of j-th of index;
If the basic weight vectors of the Evaluation of vulnerability index set containing N number of index are as follows:
W1={ w11,w12…w1N};
The then basic weight w of j-th of index1jAre as follows:
The basic weighted value of each index is compared two-by-two, calculates judgment matrix A are as follows:
Wherein,It is the basic weight w of t-th of index1tWith the basic weight of s-th of index w1sRatio, indicate judgment matrix A in element atsValue;
Consistency check, the calculation formula of coincident indicator CI are carried out to judgment matrix A are as follows:
If CI is less than preset value, by consistency check, otherwise, need to being modified to judgment matrix A, Zhi Daoman Until sufficient condition;
Each index subjectivity weight W is normalized using by the judgment matrix A after consistency check2={ w21,w22…w2N, wherein the The subjective weight w of j index2j, indicate are as follows:
In formula, aijFor the basic weight w of i-th of index1iWith the basic weight w of j-th of index1jRatio;
The process of CRITIC method parameter objective weight is as follows:
Correlation coefficient ρ between two indices X and YXYCalculation formula are as follows:
The calculation formula of standard deviation sigma in same index are as follows:
In formula, n is number of nodes;Xk、YkThe value of index X, index Y in respectively k-th of node;It is respectively all The average value of index X, index Y in n node;
The information content E that j-th of index is includedjAre as follows:
In formula,For the conflicting quantized result of j-th index and other indexs;ρijFor i-th of index and j index Between related coefficient;σjFor the standard deviation of j-th of index;
The objective weight w of j-th of index3jAre as follows:
Enable the comprehensive weight vector w of j-th of index4jAre as follows:
w4j=α w3j+βw4j
Wherein, factor alpha and β meet:
α >=0, β >=0, alpha+beta=1.
6. severity multi objective appraisal procedure temporarily drops in a kind of node voltage according to claim 5, which is characterized in that should Method further includes determining factor alpha and β using coefficient of variation method comprising:
By subjective weight vectors W2In each component { w21,w22…w2NAscending order arranges to obtain { p1,p2,...,pN, calculate difference system Number:
And then it obtains:
7. severity multi objective appraisal procedure temporarily drops in a kind of node voltage according to claim 1, which is characterized in that logical The evaluation index set for assigning each node after weight again is crossed, to calculate the mode packet of the flat score of the temporary precipitation of each node voltage It includes:
Each index after nondimensionalization is multiplied to the corresponding comprehensive weight assigned again, and the electricity of each node is obtained by adduction Press the flat score of temporary precipitation.
CN201810853644.3A 2018-07-30 2018-07-30 Severity multi objective appraisal procedure temporarily drops in node voltage Pending CN109190164A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201810853644.3A CN109190164A (en) 2018-07-30 2018-07-30 Severity multi objective appraisal procedure temporarily drops in node voltage

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201810853644.3A CN109190164A (en) 2018-07-30 2018-07-30 Severity multi objective appraisal procedure temporarily drops in node voltage

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN109190164A true CN109190164A (en) 2019-01-11

Family

ID=64937900

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201810853644.3A Pending CN109190164A (en) 2018-07-30 2018-07-30 Severity multi objective appraisal procedure temporarily drops in node voltage

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN109190164A (en)

Cited By (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN110137947A (en) * 2019-05-10 2019-08-16 华南理工大学 Severity method temporarily drops in a kind of network voltage based on ITIC curve
CN110222946A (en) * 2019-05-15 2019-09-10 天津大学 Electric distribution network overhead wire weak link identification method based on typhoon scenario simulation
CN111563682A (en) * 2020-05-07 2020-08-21 贵州电网有限责任公司 Test evaluation method for distribution automation equipment
CN112285454A (en) * 2020-09-11 2021-01-29 国网天津市电力公司电力科学研究院 Voltage sag severity evaluation method based on improved energy index
CN112766727A (en) * 2021-01-20 2021-05-07 国家电网有限公司 High-end sensitive user voltage sag severity evaluation method
CN112990695A (en) * 2021-03-11 2021-06-18 安徽大学 DG power quality evaluation method based on game DEA-multi-target decision
CN115223401A (en) * 2022-06-28 2022-10-21 中国民航大学 Airport flight area potential conflict assessment method
CN116257788A (en) * 2022-11-23 2023-06-13 浙江大学 Classification method, system and storage medium based on entropy analysis

Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN101504437A (en) * 2009-03-06 2009-08-12 华南理工大学 Method for searching electric network weakness causing voltage sag
CN102901895A (en) * 2012-09-29 2013-01-30 上海市电力公司 Method for evaluating voltage dip sensitivity of sensitive equipment
CN104076228A (en) * 2014-07-16 2014-10-01 西安科技大学 Bus criticality and vulnerability estimation method based on voltage sag
CN105893757A (en) * 2016-04-01 2016-08-24 国网河南省电力公司电力科学研究院 Voltage sag severity comprehensive evaluation method
CN105930976A (en) * 2016-04-28 2016-09-07 华北电力大学 Node voltage sag severity comprehensive assessment method based on weighted ideal point method
CN106058865A (en) * 2016-07-08 2016-10-26 东南大学 Power grid node voltage dip risk evaluation method
CN106372952A (en) * 2016-11-14 2017-02-01 北京创业公社征信服务有限公司 Objective and subjective weight determining multi-model compositional verification-based enterprise credit assessment method and system

Patent Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN101504437A (en) * 2009-03-06 2009-08-12 华南理工大学 Method for searching electric network weakness causing voltage sag
CN102901895A (en) * 2012-09-29 2013-01-30 上海市电力公司 Method for evaluating voltage dip sensitivity of sensitive equipment
CN104076228A (en) * 2014-07-16 2014-10-01 西安科技大学 Bus criticality and vulnerability estimation method based on voltage sag
CN105893757A (en) * 2016-04-01 2016-08-24 国网河南省电力公司电力科学研究院 Voltage sag severity comprehensive evaluation method
CN105930976A (en) * 2016-04-28 2016-09-07 华北电力大学 Node voltage sag severity comprehensive assessment method based on weighted ideal point method
CN106058865A (en) * 2016-07-08 2016-10-26 东南大学 Power grid node voltage dip risk evaluation method
CN106372952A (en) * 2016-11-14 2017-02-01 北京创业公社征信服务有限公司 Objective and subjective weight determining multi-model compositional verification-based enterprise credit assessment method and system

Non-Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
尤园: "《电源型元件的电压凹陷敏感度评估》", 《四川电力技术》, vol. 31, no. 4, pages 73 - 79 *
席荣宾: "《组合赋权法确定权重的方法探讨》", 《中国集体经济》, 31 December 2010 (2010-12-31), pages 2 - 4 *
陈建业: "《工业企业电能质量控制》", 机械工业出版社, pages: 73 - 79 *
陈晓静等: "《电压敏感负荷电压凹陷敏感性估计》", 《四川电力技术》, vol. 31, no. 5 *

Cited By (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN110137947A (en) * 2019-05-10 2019-08-16 华南理工大学 Severity method temporarily drops in a kind of network voltage based on ITIC curve
CN110222946A (en) * 2019-05-15 2019-09-10 天津大学 Electric distribution network overhead wire weak link identification method based on typhoon scenario simulation
CN110222946B (en) * 2019-05-15 2023-02-17 天津大学 Typhoon scene simulation-based power distribution network overhead line weak link identification method
CN111563682A (en) * 2020-05-07 2020-08-21 贵州电网有限责任公司 Test evaluation method for distribution automation equipment
CN112285454A (en) * 2020-09-11 2021-01-29 国网天津市电力公司电力科学研究院 Voltage sag severity evaluation method based on improved energy index
CN112766727A (en) * 2021-01-20 2021-05-07 国家电网有限公司 High-end sensitive user voltage sag severity evaluation method
CN112766727B (en) * 2021-01-20 2023-08-11 国家电网有限公司 High-end sensitive user voltage sag severity evaluation method
CN112990695A (en) * 2021-03-11 2021-06-18 安徽大学 DG power quality evaluation method based on game DEA-multi-target decision
CN112990695B (en) * 2021-03-11 2022-12-27 安徽大学 DG power quality evaluation method based on game DEA-multi-target decision
CN115223401A (en) * 2022-06-28 2022-10-21 中国民航大学 Airport flight area potential conflict assessment method
CN115223401B (en) * 2022-06-28 2023-10-27 中国民航大学 Airport flight area potential conflict assessment method
CN116257788A (en) * 2022-11-23 2023-06-13 浙江大学 Classification method, system and storage medium based on entropy analysis

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN109190164A (en) Severity multi objective appraisal procedure temporarily drops in node voltage
CN107563680B (en) Power distribution network reliability assessment method based on AHP and entropy weight method
CN106850254B (en) Method for identifying key nodes in power communication network
CN105956779A (en) Power transformer running state evaluation method and power transformer running state evaluation device
CN109657817A (en) A kind of distribution transformer health evaluating method
CN107453897B (en) Node importance evaluation method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium
CN110310031A (en) A kind of power distribution network multidimensional methods of risk assessment
CN104331773A (en) Comprehensive assessment method for power network planning schemes
CN111563682A (en) Test evaluation method for distribution automation equipment
CN112688431A (en) Power distribution network load overload visualization method and system based on big data
CN110348665A (en) A kind of low-voltage platform area electric power system data quality evaluating method and device
CN109934500A (en) A kind of low-voltage evaluation method, device, equipment and the storage medium of power distribution station
CN110782130A (en) Regional voltage quality comprehensive evaluation method based on multi-attribute decision
CN108346030A (en) Computer adaptive ability testing method and device
CN103577876A (en) Credible and incredible user recognizing method based on feedforward neural network
CN106655162A (en) Multi-target optimized dispatch decision evaluation method for power system
CN109117651B (en) Metering data safety protection method
CN110472822A (en) A kind of intelligent distribution network Reliability Evaluation system and method
CN105656036B (en) Consider trend and the probability static security analysis method of sensitivity uniformity equivalence
CN110390461A (en) Nonlinear smearing language power distribution network node Vulnerability Assessment based on complex network
CN106208043A (en) A kind of low and medium voltage distribution network key power consumption link discrimination method
CN111047461B (en) Black start method of direct-current multi-microgrid
Gao et al. Assessing the comprehensive importance of power grid nodes based on DEA
CN114971272A (en) Medium-voltage distribution network gridding planning evaluation method and system
CN113919162A (en) Voltage sag risk early warning method based on simulation and multi-source measured data fusion

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination