CN109186526B - Surface roughness characterization method - Google Patents
Surface roughness characterization method Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN109186526B CN109186526B CN201810989389.5A CN201810989389A CN109186526B CN 109186526 B CN109186526 B CN 109186526B CN 201810989389 A CN201810989389 A CN 201810989389A CN 109186526 B CN109186526 B CN 109186526B
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- value
- mean
- calculating
- peak
- workpiece
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01B—MEASURING LENGTH, THICKNESS OR SIMILAR LINEAR DIMENSIONS; MEASURING ANGLES; MEASURING AREAS; MEASURING IRREGULARITIES OF SURFACES OR CONTOURS
- G01B21/00—Measuring arrangements or details thereof, where the measuring technique is not covered by the other groups of this subclass, unspecified or not relevant
- G01B21/30—Measuring arrangements or details thereof, where the measuring technique is not covered by the other groups of this subclass, unspecified or not relevant for measuring roughness or irregularity of surfaces
Abstract
The existing traditional surface roughness evaluation parameters such as Ra, Rq, Rz and the like cannot provide characteristic information of the regular shape of the surface. The invention provides a surface roughness characterization method, which can make up the defect that the traditional roughness characterization method cannot describe the uniformity of the microscopic unevenness of the surface of a workpiece. The technical scheme of the invention is that the mean value of the measured data in the height direction of the microscopic profile on the surface of the workpiece is calculated to distinguish the peak value and the valley value; setting a threshold value of the peak value, calculating the ratio of the mean value of all the measurement data larger than the threshold value to the mean value of the peak value, and judging the uniformity of the surface appearance of the workpiece according to the ratio, wherein the larger the ratio is, the more uneven the microscopic profile of the surface of the workpiece is; and calculating the maximum value and the minimum value in all the measurement data, solving the mean value of the absolute values of the maximum value and the minimum value, and further judging the uniform surface topography condition of the workpiece by using the ratio of the mean value to the mean value absolute value of all the measurement data.
Description
Technical Field
The invention belongs to the technical field of machining, and particularly relates to a surface roughness characterization method.
Background
Parts to be mounted in mechanical devices, which are usually machined before assembly, are referred to as workpieces during machining, and the microscopic geometric features of the surfaces of the workpieces have a great influence on the wear resistance, sealing, fit, corrosion resistance, friction, heat conduction, adherence, and conductive lamp performance of the workpieces. Meanwhile, the microscopic geometric shape of the workpiece has close relation with the running stability, running precision, working reliability, vibration and noise of the whole equipment. Therefore, it is very important in mechanical equipment to be able to clearly describe the micro-geometric characteristics of the workpiece surface.
The micro-geometric characteristics of the workpiece surface are generally composed of three components, roughness, waviness and surface shape errors. Surface roughness is the most common parameter in machining that describes the micro-geometry of the machined surface, which reflects the micro-geometry characteristics of the fine texture of the surface of the mechanical part. Some machined surfaces have random microscopic geometries, while other machined surfaces have regular characteristics, but the conventional surface roughness evaluation parameters such as Ra, Rq, Rz and the like cannot provide characteristic information of surface regular shapes. Therefore, a need exists for a method that can better characterize the uniformity of the micro-asperities of the surface of the workpiece being processed, so as to more effectively characterize the micro-topography.
Disclosure of Invention
The purpose of the invention is: the method can make up the defect that the traditional roughness characterization mode cannot describe the uniformity of the microscopic unevenness of the surface of the workpiece.
In order to achieve the purpose, the technical scheme of the invention is as follows: calculating the mean value of the measurement data in the height direction of the microscopic profile on the surface of the workpiece; setting a threshold value of the peak value, calculating the ratio of the mean value of all the measurement data larger than the threshold value to the mean value of the peak value, and judging the uniformity of the surface appearance of the workpiece according to the ratio, wherein the larger the ratio is, the more uneven the microscopic profile of the surface of the workpiece is; calculating the maximum value and the minimum value in all the measurement data, calculating the mean value of the absolute values of the maximum value and the minimum value, and further judging the uniform surface topography of the workpiece by using the ratio of the mean value to the absolute value of the mean value of all the measurement data, wherein the operation method comprises the following steps:
1. measuring the surface of the processed workpiece by using a roughness measuring instrument to obtain N continuous measurement data a in the height direction of the microscopic profile in a sampling interval of the processed surfaceiI =1, 2, 3, … …, N;
2. calculating the measurement data aiAnd drawing an M mean line;
3. a greater than the mean value MiCalled peak value, a smaller than mean value MiCalled valley value, calculating peak value mean value Fmean;
4. calculating a threshold value Fy for the peak value, said threshold value Fy being equal to the peak mean value Fmean multiplied by a threshold coefficient Xf, i.e.: fy = Fmean Xf, the threshold coefficient Xf being greater than or equal to 1;
5. calculating a relative coefficient Sf equal to all the a's greater than FyiAbsolute value | a of the mean ofimeanThe ratio of | to the absolute value of the peak mean | Fmean |, i.e. Sf = | aimean|/|Fmean|;
6. Calculating the distance Dfmax from the maximum peak point to the M mean line and the distance Dfmin from the minimum peak point to the M mean line;
7. calculating the distance Dgmax from the minimum valley point to the M mean line and the distance Dgmin from the maximum valley point to the M mean line;
8. calculating a maximum coefficient Sfg which is equal to the ratio of the sum of Dfmax and Dgmax to the sum of Dfmin and Dgmin, namely Sfg = (Dfmax + Dgmax)/(Dfmin + Dgmin);
9. and judging the uniformity of the micro-morphology of the surface of the workpiece according to the values of the relative coefficient Sf and the maximum coefficient Sfg, wherein the closer the value of Sf or Sfg is to 1, the more uniform the micro-geometry of the machined surface is, and the larger the value of Sf or Sfg is, the more non-uniform the micro-geometry of the machined surface is.
The invention has the advantages that: according to the invention, the relative coefficient and the maximum coefficient are obtained by calculating the peak value mean condition that the measurement data of the microscopic profile in the sampling length exceeds the peak value threshold value and the maximum value and minimum value conditions in all the measurement data, and the relative coefficient and the maximum coefficient can reflect the peak value distribution condition in the microscopic profile and can also reflect the size of the maximum measurement value and the minimum measurement value, so that the roughness of the microscopic profile on the surface of the workpiece can be described by using the method, and the uniformity degree of the microscopic profile can be accurately represented.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a sample surface micro-topography of a machined workpiece A.
FIG. 2 is a sample surface micro-topography of workpiece A with the addition of a collinearity.
In the figure, 1, peak, 2, valley, 3, M mean line.
Detailed Description
The invention is described in further detail below with reference to the figures and specific embodiments.
The surface roughness characterization method comprises the following specific processes:
s1, measuring the surface of the processed workpiece A by using a roughness measuring instrument to obtain 31 continuous measurement data a in the height direction of the microscopic contour in the surface sampling interval of the processed workpiece A1=20,a2=5,a3=30,a4=5,a5=15,a6=3,a7=30,a8=5,a9=25,a10=5,a11=30,a12=3,a13=20,a14=5,a15=20,a16=2,a17=28,a18=5,a19=20,a20=10,a21=20,a22=5,a23=20,a24=5,a25=30,a26=5,a27=20,a28=5,a29=20,a30=5,a31=25;
S2, calculating the measurement data aiM =14.39 and draws a line of the M means, as in fig. 2;
s3, a > mean M =14.39iCalled peak, a less than mean M =14.39iCalled valley, the peak mean Fmean =23.31 is calculated;
s4, calculating a threshold Fy for the peak value, the threshold Fy being equal to the peak mean value Fmean multiplied by a threshold coefficient Xf, the threshold Xf being taken to be 1.2, then Fy =23.31 x 1.2= 27.97;
s5, calculating a relative coefficient Sf, wherein Sf is equal to all the a larger than FyiAbsolute value | a of the mean ofimeanThe ratio of | =29.6 to the absolute value of the peak mean | Fmean | =23.31, i.e. Sf =29.6/23.31= 1.27;
s6, calculating distance Dfmax =30-14.39=15.61 from the maximum peak point to the M-means line, and distance Dfmin =15-14.39=0.61 from the minimum peak point to the M-means line;
s7, calculating the distance Dgmax =14.39-2=12.39 from the minimum valley point to the M-means line, and the distance Dgmin =14.39-5=9.39 from the maximum valley point to the M-means line;
s8, calculating a maximum coefficient Sfg, where Sfg is equal to the ratio of the sum of Dfmax and Dgmax to the sum of Dfmin and Dgmin, i.e., Sfg = (Dfmax + Dgmax)/(Dfmin + Dgmin) = (15.61 + 12.30)/(0.61 + 9.39) = 2.79;
and S9, judging the uniformity of the micro-topography of the workpiece surface according to the values of the relative coefficient Sf and the maximum coefficient Sfg, wherein the values of Sf =1.27 and Sfg =2.79 are both greater than 1, which indicates that the micro-topography of the processed surface A is in an uneven state.
It should also be noted that the above example is only one specific embodiment of the present invention. It is obvious that the invention is not limited solely to the above embodiments, but that many variations are possible. All modifications which can be derived or suggested by a person skilled in the art from the disclosure of the invention should be considered as within the scope of the invention.
Claims (1)
1. A surface roughness characterization method is characterized by comprising the following steps:
step 1, measuring the surface of a machined workpiece by using a roughness measuring instrument to obtain N continuous measurement data a in the height direction of a microscopic contour in a machined surface sampling intervaliI =1, 2, 3, … …, N;
step 2, calculating the measurement data aiAnd drawing an M mean line;
step 3, a is larger than the average value MiCalled peak value, a smaller than mean value MiCalled valley value, calculating peak value mean value Fmean;
step 4, calculating a threshold Fy of the peak value, wherein the threshold Fy is equal to the peak value mean value Fmean multiplied by a threshold coefficient Xf, namely: fy = Fmean Xf, the threshold coefficient Xf being greater than or equal to 1;
step 5, calculating a relative coefficient Sf, wherein Sf is equal to all the a which is larger than FyiAbsolute value | a of the mean ofimeanThe ratio of | to the absolute value of the peak mean | Fmean |, i.e. Sf = | aimean|/|Fmean|;
Step 6, calculating the distance Dfmax from the maximum peak point to the M mean line and the distance Dfmin from the minimum peak point to the M mean line;
step 7, calculating the distance Dgmax from the minimum valley point to the M mean line and the distance Dgmin from the maximum valley point to the M mean line;
step 8, calculating a maximum coefficient Sfg which is equal to the ratio of the sum of Dfmax and Dgmax to the sum of Dfmin and Dgmin, namely Sfg = (Dfmax + Dgmax)/(Dfmin + Dgmin);
and 9, judging the uniformity of the micro-morphology of the surface of the workpiece according to the values of the relative coefficient Sf and the maximum coefficient Sfg, wherein the closer the value of Sf or Sfg is to 1, the more uniform the micro-geometry of the processed surface is, and the larger the value of Sf or Sfg is, the more non-uniform the micro-geometry of the processed surface is.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201810989389.5A CN109186526B (en) | 2018-08-28 | 2018-08-28 | Surface roughness characterization method |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201810989389.5A CN109186526B (en) | 2018-08-28 | 2018-08-28 | Surface roughness characterization method |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN109186526A CN109186526A (en) | 2019-01-11 |
CN109186526B true CN109186526B (en) | 2020-09-25 |
Family
ID=64916443
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN201810989389.5A Active CN109186526B (en) | 2018-08-28 | 2018-08-28 | Surface roughness characterization method |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN109186526B (en) |
Families Citing this family (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN114370844B (en) * | 2021-12-20 | 2024-03-22 | 包头钢铁(集团)有限责任公司 | Statistical method for uniformity of characteristic values of surface of plate |
Family Cites Families (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPH07104497A (en) * | 1993-10-01 | 1995-04-21 | Fuji Electric Co Ltd | Conductive substrate for electrophotographic photoreceptor and substrate surface contour evalculation method |
JP4797769B2 (en) * | 2006-04-20 | 2011-10-19 | 株式会社日立製作所 | Elevators and elevator sheaves |
CN102790152B (en) * | 2011-05-20 | 2015-09-09 | 昆山中辰矽晶有限公司 | Brilliant base material of heap of stone and manufacture method thereof |
CN104880171B (en) * | 2015-06-04 | 2017-11-10 | 深圳市商德先进陶瓷股份有限公司 | Detecting system, the method and device of porous ceramic surface roughness |
CN108007326B (en) * | 2017-12-04 | 2018-11-27 | 第一拖拉机股份有限公司 | A method of using gear measuring center Measurement and evaluation tooth-face roughness |
-
2018
- 2018-08-28 CN CN201810989389.5A patent/CN109186526B/en active Active
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN109186526A (en) | 2019-01-11 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
McCool | Relating profile instrument measurements to the functional performance of rough surfaces | |
Greenwood et al. | Contact of nominally flat surfaces | |
He et al. | The fractal character of processed metal surfaces | |
US8082114B2 (en) | Method for characterizing the endurance limit of a part from its surface profile | |
Stout | Surface roughness∼ measurement, interpretation and significance of data | |
CN109186526B (en) | Surface roughness characterization method | |
Ciulli et al. | Rough contacts between actual engineering surfaces: Part I. Simple models for roughness description | |
CN112364451A (en) | Modeling method for normal stiffness of rough surface considering elastic-plastic contact continuous monotony | |
KR20120042650A (en) | A process for predicting a coefficient of friction | |
De Chiffre et al. | Advantages and industrial applications of three-dimensional surface roughness analysis | |
CN112504209B (en) | High-precision cutter wear 2D online detection method | |
CN112199632B (en) | Laser-textured aluminum alloy surface hardness prediction method | |
CN109190236B (en) | Method for characterizing surface morphology features of machined workpiece | |
Pawlus | Mechanical filtration of surface profiles | |
Wei et al. | The bifractal stratified characterization of a plateau honing cylinder liner surface profile during the wearing process | |
US5581483A (en) | Measurement of shot peening coverage by correlation analysis of surface line data | |
Ardi et al. | Surface roughness, areal topographic measurement, and correlation to LCF behavior in a nickel-based superalloy | |
CN111368376B (en) | Round contour error monitoring method based on Gaussian process model | |
Sasajima et al. | A software-based relocation technique for surface asperity profiles and its application to calculate volume changes in running-in wear | |
Han et al. | Fractal characterization and simulation of surface profiles of copper electrodes and aluminum sheets | |
CN110849683B (en) | Model and judging method for judging machine core clamping plate material | |
Yost | Two profilometric measurements of wear | |
Damiano | Surface profile: research and insight | |
CN109766582B (en) | Prediction method for tensile strength of metal material | |
Elewa et al. | Importance of checking the stylus radius in the measurement of surface roughness |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PB01 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
GR01 | Patent grant |