CN109034568B - Enterprise reported data credibility evaluation system and implementation method thereof - Google Patents

Enterprise reported data credibility evaluation system and implementation method thereof Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN109034568B
CN109034568B CN201810759582.XA CN201810759582A CN109034568B CN 109034568 B CN109034568 B CN 109034568B CN 201810759582 A CN201810759582 A CN 201810759582A CN 109034568 B CN109034568 B CN 109034568B
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
index
data
enterprise
credibility
score
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
CN201810759582.XA
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN109034568A (en
Inventor
吴建州
李勇波
季统凯
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
G Cloud Technology Co Ltd
Original Assignee
G Cloud Technology Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by G Cloud Technology Co Ltd filed Critical G Cloud Technology Co Ltd
Priority to CN201810759582.XA priority Critical patent/CN109034568B/en
Publication of CN109034568A publication Critical patent/CN109034568A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN109034568B publication Critical patent/CN109034568B/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
    • G06Q10/063Operations research, analysis or management
    • G06Q10/0639Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations

Landscapes

  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Development Economics (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
  • Educational Administration (AREA)
  • Operations Research (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

The invention relates to the technical field of computer application, in particular to an enterprise reported data credibility assessment system and an implementation method thereof. The system of the invention consists of a data rule analysis component, a data credibility evaluation component and a data identification component. And the data rule analysis component calculates a time-consuming credible interval of each index report, and generates an index data credible rule base and an index data logic credible rule base. And the data credibility evaluation component calculates the credibility score of the single index, and then calculates the total reported credibility score according to enterprise summarization. And the data identification component filters the untrusted data according to the limited credibility score based on the single index credibility score and the enterprise reported credibility total score calculated by the data credibility evaluation component, and summarizes the credibility index set and the credible enterprise reported data set in groups. The invention provides a method for evaluating the credibility of reported data of a computing enterprise and generating a credible index set and a credible enterprise reported data set, which can be suitable for screening credible enterprise index data by government departments and provide reliable data bases for making work suggestions and decisions.

Description

Enterprise reported data credibility evaluation system and implementation method thereof
Technical Field
The invention relates to the technical field of computer application, in particular to an enterprise reported data credibility evaluation system and an implementation method thereof.
Background
The government departments can learn about the business situation of the enterprise and make instructive work suggestions and decisions by collecting various index data reported by the enterprise. Because the data reporting process of an enterprise cannot be supervised in real time, the condition that data are reported randomly is not excluded; untrusted data tends to bias work advice and decisions from the correct direction. At this time, a system for identifying the reliability of reported data by analyzing the time of reporting data, index values and index data logic of an enterprise is needed, so as to screen a credible index data set and provide reliable data basis for making work suggestions and decisions.
Disclosure of Invention
One of the technical problems to be solved by the invention is to provide an enterprise reported data credibility evaluation system, which calculates the reported time-consuming credibility, the logical credibility and the numerical credibility, and calculates the comprehensive credibility score in a summary manner; and then filtering out enterprise index values lower than the limited credibility score, and finally forming instructive enterprise index data.
The second technical problem to be solved by the present invention is to provide a method for implementing the enterprise reported data credibility assessment system.
The technical scheme for solving one of the technical problems of the invention is as follows:
the system comprises a data rule analysis component, a data credibility evaluation component and a data identification component;
the data rule realizes that: the analysis component calculates a reporting time-consuming credible interval of each index by collecting reporting time-consuming distribution conditions of all enterprise indexes; grouping each index data, and performing regular expression detection, data continuous range detection and data discrete range detection to generate an index data credible rule base; combining the indexes to generate an index data logic credible rule base;
the data credibility evaluation component realizes that: calculating the reporting time consumption reliability, the numerical value reliability and the logic reliability of the indexes, respectively giving weights to calculate the reliability scores of the single indexes, and then calculating the total reporting reliability score according to enterprise summarization;
the data authentication component implements: and filtering the untrusted data according to the limited credibility score based on the single index credibility score and the enterprise reported credibility total score calculated by the data credibility evaluation component, and grouping and summarizing the credibility index set and the credible enterprise reported data set.
The second technical solution for solving the above technical problems of the present invention is:
The method comprises the following specific steps:
collecting the reporting time-consuming distribution conditions of all enterprise indexes, and calculating the reporting time-consuming credible interval of each index;
grouping each index data, and performing regular expression detection, data continuous range detection and data discrete range detection to generate an index data credible rule base;
combining the indexes to generate an index data logic credible rule base;
secondly, calculating time-consuming credibility of all enterprise indexes according to the time-consuming of reporting the index data by the enterprise and the time-consuming credibility interval of reporting the indexes;
calculating the reliability of the index data according to the detection of the index regular expression, the continuous range of the index data and the rule base of the discrete range of the index data;
calculating the index logic credibility according to the data logic credibility rule base;
thirdly, calculating an index credibility score according to the index time consumption credibility, the index logic credibility and the index data credibility;
fourthly, calculating the total credibility score reported by the enterprise according to the credibility score of the enterprise index;
fifthly, filtering out enterprise index values lower than a limited credibility score based on the index credibility score;
and filtering out enterprise reported data lower than the limited credibility score based on the enterprise reported credibility total score, and generating a credible enterprise reported data set.
The calculation step of the time-consuming credible interval for reporting the index comprises the following steps:
the method comprises the steps of firstly, calculating the number of enterprises in groups according to the reported time consumption of indexes, and arranging the enterprises in a descending order, wherein the reported time consumption sequence is T1 … Tn, the number of the corresponding enterprises is Q1... Qn, and n is the reported time consumption group number of the indexes;
secondly, calculating the proportion of Q1 in the total number of enterprises, wherein if the proportion reaches 60%, the credible interval is [ T1, T1 ]; if the percentage of the enterprises is not 60%, accumulating Q2, if the percentage is 60%, if T1 is less than T2, the credible interval is [ T1, T2], otherwise, the credible interval is [ T2, T1 ]; if not, continuing the third step;
and thirdly, accumulating Qi and calculating the enterprise number ratio, wherein when the ratio reaches 60%, if Ti is in a credible interval, the credible interval does not need to be modified, if the Ti is larger than the credible interval, the maximum value of the credible interval is replaced, otherwise, the minimum value of the credible interval is replaced, wherein i is the reporting time consumption serial number 3.
The regular expression detection defines an index value type, a data continuous range detection defines an index value interval, and a data discrete range detection defines an index value discrete range.
The logic credible rule base defines an enterprise with a certain or a plurality of same index values, and the index n of the enterprise has a specific value type, a value range or a value discrete range.
The reporting time consumption credibility calculation method comprises the following steps: if the time consumption of the enterprise reporting index is greater than or equal to the minimum value of the time-consumption credibility interval, the time-consumption credibility is 1; if the time consumption of the enterprise reporting index is less than the minimum value of the time-consuming credible interval, respectively calculating the distance D1 between the reported time consumption of the enterprise and the minimum value of the credible interval and the distance D2 between the minimum value of the credible interval and the average value of the credible interval, if D1 is more than D2, the time-consuming credibility is 0.2, otherwise, the time-consuming credibility is 0.5.
The numerical value credibility and logic credibility calculation method comprises the following steps: (S1+ S2+ S3)/3, where S is a numerical reliability and a logical reliability score, S1 is a regular expression detection score, S2 is a continuous range score, and S3 is a discrete range score;
the calculation method of S1 is as follows: if the types of the index data reported by the enterprise are matched, the score is 1, and if the types of the index data reported by the enterprise are not matched, the score is 0;
the calculation method of S2 is as follows: if the index value reported by the enterprise is in the continuous range, the score is 1; otherwise, respectively calculating the distance D1 between the index value reported by the enterprise and the minimum value or the maximum value of the continuous range and the distance D2 between the minimum value of the continuous range and the average value of the continuous range, if D1 is more than D2, the score is 0.2, otherwise, the score is 0.5;
The S3 calculation method comprises the following steps: if the enterprise reported index data meets the matching of the discrete range, the score is 1, and if the enterprise reported index data does not meet the matching of the discrete range, the score is 0.
The index credibility score calculation method comprises the following steps: q is 0.2 × Q1+0.4 × Q2+0.4 × Q3, where Q is the index confidence score, Q1 is the reported elapsed time confidence score, Q2 is the numeric confidence score, Q3 is the logical confidence score, and the corresponding weights are 0.2, 0.4, and 0.4, respectively.
The method for calculating the total credibility score reported by the enterprise comprises the following steps:
Figure BDA0001727562130000041
wherein R is the total credibility score reported by the enterprise, Q is the credibility score of the enterprise index, and n is the total number of the enterprise index reported.
The invention has the beneficial effects that:
by analyzing the enterprise reported data time, the reported index data value and the data logic, a credible rule base is automatically generated, and a check rule does not need to be manually formulated; the credibility of reported data is identified and credibility index data sets are screened by calculating the credibility score of a single index and the total credibility score reported by enterprises, so that reliable data basis is provided for making work suggestions and decisions.
Drawings
The invention is further described below with reference to the accompanying drawings:
FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of the architecture of the present invention.
Detailed Description
As shown in fig. 1, the enterprise reported data credibility assessment system of the present invention is composed of a data rule analysis component, a data credibility evaluation component, and a data identification component.
The data rule analysis component calculates a reporting time-consuming credible interval of each index by collecting reporting time-consuming distribution conditions of all enterprise indexes, generates an index data credible rule base by grouping each index data and performing regular expression detection, data continuous range detection and data discrete range detection, and generates an index data logic credible rule base by combining the indexes and the indexes in a correlation manner;
the data credibility evaluation component respectively calculates reporting time-consuming credibility, numerical credibility and logical credibility of the indexes, respectively gives weights to calculate credibility scores of the single indexes, and then calculates a total reporting credibility score according to enterprise summarization;
and the data identification component filters the untrusted data according to the limited credibility score based on the single index credibility score and the enterprise reported credibility total score calculated by the data credibility evaluation component, and summarizes the credibility index set and the credible enterprise reported data set in groups.
The detailed implementation process of the enterprise reported data credibility evaluation system comprises the following steps:
step one, collecting time-consuming distribution conditions of reporting of all enterprise indexes, and calculating a time-consuming credible interval of reporting of each index;
secondly, grouping each index data, and performing regular expression detection, data continuous range detection and data discrete range detection to generate an index data credible rule base;
Thirdly, combining the indexes in a correlation manner, detecting a regular expression, a data continuous range and a data discrete range, and generating an index data logic credible rule base;
fourthly, calculating time-consuming credibility of all enterprise indexes according to the time-consuming of reporting the index data by the enterprise and the time-consuming credibility interval of reporting the indexes;
fifthly, calculating the reliability of the index data according to the detection of the index regular expression, the continuous range of the index data and the rule base of the discrete range of the index data;
sixthly, calculating the logical reliability of the index according to the logical reliability rule base of the data;
seventhly, calculating an index credibility score according to the index time consumption credibility, the index logic credibility and the index data credibility;
eighthly, calculating a total credibility score reported by the enterprise according to the credibility score of the enterprise index;
the ninth step, based on the index credibility score, filtering out enterprise index values lower than the limited credibility score to generate a credibility index set;
and tenth, filtering out enterprise reported data lower than the limited credibility score based on the total credibility score reported by the enterprise, and generating a credible enterprise reported data set.
The calculation step of the time-consuming credible interval for reporting the index comprises the following steps:
The method comprises the steps that firstly, the number of enterprises is calculated in groups according to the reporting time consumption of indexes and is arranged in a descending order, the reporting time consumption sequence is T1 … Tn, the number of the corresponding enterprises is Q1 … Qn, and n is the number of the groups of the reporting time consumption of the indexes;
secondly, calculating the proportion of Q1 in the total number of enterprises, wherein if the proportion reaches 60%, the credible interval is [ T1, T1 ]; if the percentage of the enterprises is not 60%, accumulating Q2, if the percentage is 60%, if T1 is less than T2, the credible interval is [ T1, T2], otherwise, the credible interval is [ T2, T1 ]; if not, continuing the third step;
and thirdly, accumulating Qi and calculating the enterprise number ratio, wherein when the ratio reaches 60%, if Ti is in a credible interval, the credible interval does not need to be modified, if Ti is larger than the credible interval, the maximum value of the credible interval is replaced, otherwise, the minimum value of the credible interval is replaced, wherein i is the reporting time-consuming sequence number 3 … n.
The regular expression detection defines the value type of the index, the data continuous range defines the value interval of the index, and the data discrete range defines the value discrete range of the index.
The logic credible rule base defines an enterprise with a certain or several same index values, and the index n of the enterprise has a specific value type, a value range or a value discrete range.
The reporting time consumption credibility calculation method comprises the following steps: if the time consumption of the enterprise reporting index is greater than or equal to the minimum value of the time-consumption credibility interval, the time-consumption credibility is 1; if the time consumption of the enterprise reporting index is less than the minimum value of the time-consuming credible interval, respectively calculating the distance D1 between the reported time consumption of the enterprise and the minimum value of the credible interval and the distance D2 between the minimum value of the credible interval and the average value of the credible interval, if D1 is more than D2, the time-consuming credibility is 0.2, otherwise, the time-consuming credibility is 0.5;
The numerical reliability and logic reliability calculation method comprises the following steps: (S1+ S2+ S3)/3, where S is a numerical reliability and a logical reliability score, S1 is a regular expression detection score, S2 is a continuous range score, and S3 is a discrete range score;
the calculation method of S1 is as follows: if the types of the index data reported by the enterprise are matched, the score is 1, and if the types of the index data reported by the enterprise are not matched, the score is 0;
the calculation method of S2 is as follows: if the index value reported by the enterprise is in the continuous range, the score is 1; otherwise, respectively calculating the distance D1 between the index value reported by the enterprise and the minimum value or the maximum value of the continuous range and the distance D2 between the minimum value of the continuous range and the average value of the continuous range, if D1 is more than D2, the score is 0.2, otherwise, the score is 0.5;
the calculation method of S3 is as follows: if the index data reported by the enterprise meets the matching of the discrete range, the score is 1, and if the index data reported by the enterprise does not meet the matching of the discrete range, the score is 0.
The index credibility score calculation method comprises the following steps: q0.2 × Q1+0.4 × Q2+0.4 × Q3, where Q is the index confidence score, Q1 is the reported elapsed time confidence score, Q2 is the numeric confidence score, Q3 is the logical confidence score, and the corresponding weights are 0.2, 0.4, and 0.4, respectively;
the method for calculating the total credibility score reported by the enterprise comprises the following steps:
Figure BDA0001727562130000081
wherein R is the total credit score reported by the enterprise, Q is the credit score of the enterprise index, and n is the total number of the enterprise index reported.

Claims (3)

1. An implementation method of an enterprise reported data credibility assessment system is characterized by comprising the following steps: the system comprises a data rule analysis component, a data credibility evaluation component and a data identification component;
the data rule analysis component realizes that: calculating a reporting time-consuming credible interval of each index by collecting reporting time-consuming distribution conditions of all enterprise indexes; grouping each index data, and performing regular expression detection, data continuous range detection and data discrete range detection to generate an index data credible rule base; combining the indexes to generate an index data logic credible rule base;
the data credibility evaluation component realizes that: calculating reporting time consumption reliability, index data reliability and logic reliability of the indexes, respectively giving weights to calculate single index reliability scores, and then calculating a total reporting reliability score according to enterprise summarization;
the data authentication component implements: filtering the untrusted data according to a limited credibility score based on the single index credibility score and the enterprise reported credibility total score calculated by the data credibility evaluation component, and grouping and summarizing a credible index set and a credible enterprise reported data set;
The method comprises the following specific steps:
collecting the reporting time-consuming distribution conditions of all enterprise indexes, and calculating the reporting time-consuming credible interval of each index;
grouping each index data, and performing regular expression detection, data continuous range detection and data discrete range detection to generate an index data credible rule base;
combining the indexes to generate an index data logic credible rule base;
secondly, calculating time-consuming credibility of all enterprise indexes according to the time-consuming of reporting the index data by the enterprise and the time-consuming credibility interval of reporting the indexes;
calculating the reliability of the index data according to the detection of the index regular expression, the continuous range of the index data and the rule base of the discrete range of the index data;
calculating the logical credibility of the indexes according to the logical credibility rule base of the index data;
thirdly, calculating an index credibility score according to the index time consumption credibility, the index logic credibility and the index data credibility;
fourthly, calculating the total credibility score reported by the enterprise according to the credibility score of the enterprise index;
fifthly, filtering out enterprise index values lower than a limited credibility score based on the index credibility score;
filtering out enterprise reported data lower than a limited credibility score based on the enterprise reported credibility total score, and generating a credible enterprise reported data set;
The calculation step of the time-consuming credible interval for reporting the index comprises the following steps:
the first step, calculating the number of enterprises in groups according to the reported consumed time of the indexes and arranging the enterprises in a descending order, wherein the reported consumed time sequence is T1 … Tn, the number of the corresponding enterprises is Q1 … Qn, and n is the reported consumed time group number of the indexes;
secondly, calculating the proportion of Q1 to the total number of enterprises, and if the proportion reaches 60%, reporting a time-consuming credible interval [ T1, T1 ]; if the percentage of the enterprise is not up to 60%, accumulating Q2 by the number of the enterprises, if the percentage of the enterprise is up to 60%, if the T1 is less than T2, reporting a time-consuming credible interval to the index as [ T1, T2], otherwise, reporting the time-consuming credible interval to the index as [ T2, T1 ]; if not, continuing the third step;
thirdly, accumulating Qi and calculating the percentage of the number of enterprises, when the percentage reaches 60%, if Ti is in the time-consuming credible interval for reporting the index, the time-consuming credible interval for reporting the index does not need to be modified, if Ti is larger than the time-consuming credible interval for reporting the index, the maximum value of the time-consuming credible interval for reporting the index is replaced, otherwise, the minimum value of the time-consuming credible interval for reporting the index is replaced, wherein i is a reporting time-consuming serial number 3 … n;
the method for calculating the time consumption credibility of the index comprises the following steps: if the time consumption of reporting the index by the enterprise is more than or equal to the minimum value of the time consumption credibility interval of reporting the index by the enterprise, the time consumption credibility is 1; if the time consumed by the enterprise to report the index is less than the minimum value of the confidence interval of the time consumed by the index, respectively calculating the distance D1 between the time consumed by the enterprise and the minimum value of the confidence interval of the time consumed by the index, and the distance D2 between the minimum value of the confidence interval of the time consumed by the index and the average value of the confidence interval of the time consumed by the index, if D1 is more than D2, the time-consuming confidence level is 0.2, otherwise, the time-consuming confidence level is 0.5;
The index data reliability and index logic reliability calculation method comprises the following steps: s = (S1+ S2+ S3)/3, where S is the index data reliability and index logical reliability score, S1 is the regular expression detection score, S2 is the continuous range score, and S3 is the discrete range score;
the calculation method of S1 is as follows: if the types of the index data reported by the enterprise are matched, the score is 1, and if the types of the index data reported by the enterprise are not matched, the score is 0;
the calculation method of S2 is as follows: if the index value reported by the enterprise is in the continuous range, the score is 1; otherwise, respectively calculating the distance D1 between the index value reported by the enterprise and the minimum value or the maximum value of the continuous range and the distance D2 between the minimum value of the continuous range and the average value of the continuous range, if D1 is more than D2, the score is 0.2, otherwise, the score is 0.5;
the calculation method of S3 is as follows: if the enterprise reported index data meets the matching of the discrete range, the score is 1, and if the enterprise reported index data does not meet the matching of the discrete range, the score is 0;
the index credibility score calculation method comprises the following steps: q =0.2 × Q1+0.4 × Q2+0.4 × Q3, where Q is an index confidence score, Q1 is an index time-consuming confidence score, Q2 is an index data confidence score, Q3 is an index logical confidence score, and the corresponding weights are 0.2, 0.4, and 0.4, respectively;
the method for calculating the total credibility score reported by the enterprise comprises the following steps: r = (
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE002
) And n 100, wherein R is total score of enterprise reported credibility, Q is score of enterprise index credibility, and n is total number of enterprise reported indexes.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein: the regular expression detection defines an index value type, a data continuous range detection defines an index value interval, and a data discrete range detection defines an index value discrete range.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein: the index data logic credible rule base defines an enterprise with a certain or a plurality of same index values, and the index n of the enterprise has a specific value type, a value interval or a value discrete range.
CN201810759582.XA 2018-07-11 2018-07-11 Enterprise reported data credibility evaluation system and implementation method thereof Active CN109034568B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201810759582.XA CN109034568B (en) 2018-07-11 2018-07-11 Enterprise reported data credibility evaluation system and implementation method thereof

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201810759582.XA CN109034568B (en) 2018-07-11 2018-07-11 Enterprise reported data credibility evaluation system and implementation method thereof

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN109034568A CN109034568A (en) 2018-12-18
CN109034568B true CN109034568B (en) 2022-06-10

Family

ID=64641284

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201810759582.XA Active CN109034568B (en) 2018-07-11 2018-07-11 Enterprise reported data credibility evaluation system and implementation method thereof

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN109034568B (en)

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN105023119A (en) * 2015-08-19 2015-11-04 安徽继远软件有限公司 Method for evaluating reliability of data assets

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN105631593A (en) * 2015-12-24 2016-06-01 安徽融信金模信息技术有限公司 Enterprise evaluation method based on data credibility
US9679254B1 (en) * 2016-02-29 2017-06-13 Www.Trustscience.Com Inc. Extrapolating trends in trust scores
CN106779457A (en) * 2016-12-29 2017-05-31 深圳微众税银信息服务有限公司 A kind of rating business credit method and system
CN107527212A (en) * 2017-08-16 2017-12-29 无锡企业征信有限公司 Business standing dynamic grading system and method

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN105023119A (en) * 2015-08-19 2015-11-04 安徽继远软件有限公司 Method for evaluating reliability of data assets

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN109034568A (en) 2018-12-18

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Bhattacharya et al. An ANN-based auditor decision support system using Benford's law
CN104881783A (en) E-bank account fraudulent conduct and risk detecting method and system
CN105279691A (en) Financial transaction detection method and equipment based on random forest model
CN109949152A (en) A kind of personal credit's violation correction method
CN104408547A (en) Data-mining-based detection method for medical insurance fraud behavior
CN110852881B (en) Risk account identification method and device, electronic equipment and medium
CN104574141A (en) Service influence degree analysis method
Matos et al. An empirical method for discovering tax fraudsters: A real case study of brazilian fiscal evasion
CN113095927A (en) Method and device for identifying suspicious transactions of anti-money laundering
CN103366091A (en) Abnormal declare dutiable goods data detection method based on exponentially weighted average of multi-level threshold values
CN105005711A (en) Method and device for acquiring statistical line loss
CN106228190A (en) Decision tree method of discrimination for resident's exception water
Goo et al. Improving the prediction of going concern of Taiwanese listed companies using a hybrid of LASSO with data mining techniques
Liu et al. Application of hierarchical clustering in tax inspection case-selecting
CN115953252A (en) Method for determining construction safety liability insurance premium
Qin et al. Evaluation of goaf stability based on transfer learning theory of artificial intelligence
CN115063056A (en) Construction behavior safety risk dynamic analysis method based on graph topology analysis improvement
CN111222968A (en) Enterprise tax risk management and control method and system
CN109034568B (en) Enterprise reported data credibility evaluation system and implementation method thereof
CN104794234A (en) Data processing method and device for benchmarking
CN108122059B (en) Production risk identification method and automatic early warning system for pharmaceutical manufacturing enterprise
CN112465397A (en) Audit data analysis method and device
Yang A study on the impact of corporate financial accounting management system on corporate innovation under sustainable development strategy
CN116415836A (en) Security evaluation method for intelligent power grid information system
CN109992592A (en) Impoverished College Studentss recognition methods based on campus consumption card pipelined data

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
CB02 Change of applicant information
CB02 Change of applicant information

Address after: 19 / F, Cloud Computing Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, No.1 Kehui Road, Songshanhu high tech Industrial Development Zone, Dongguan City, Guangdong Province, 523000

Applicant after: G-CLOUD TECHNOLOGY Co.,Ltd.

Address before: 523808 No. 14 Building, Songke Garden, Songshan Lake Science and Technology Industrial Park, Dongguan City, Guangdong Province

Applicant before: G-CLOUD TECHNOLOGY Co.,Ltd.

GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant