CN108985532B - Network source load scheduling evaluation system and method based on carbon emission - Google Patents
Network source load scheduling evaluation system and method based on carbon emission Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN108985532B CN108985532B CN201710406692.3A CN201710406692A CN108985532B CN 108985532 B CN108985532 B CN 108985532B CN 201710406692 A CN201710406692 A CN 201710406692A CN 108985532 B CN108985532 B CN 108985532B
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- scheduling
- load
- carbon emission
- power
- carbon
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
- 229910052799 carbon Inorganic materials 0.000 title claims abstract description 67
- OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N Carbon Chemical compound [C] OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 title claims abstract description 65
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 30
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 7
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 13
- 230000007613 environmental effect Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 11
- 230000005284 excitation Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 6
- 230000005611 electricity Effects 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000002347 injection Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000007924 injection Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 abstract description 2
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 abstract description 2
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000006855 networking Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0631—Resource planning, allocation, distributing or scheduling for enterprises or organisations
- G06Q10/06312—Adjustment or analysis of established resource schedule, e.g. resource or task levelling, or dynamic rescheduling
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/06—Energy or water supply
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02P—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
- Y02P90/00—Enabling technologies with a potential contribution to greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions mitigation
- Y02P90/80—Management or planning
- Y02P90/84—Greenhouse gas [GHG] management systems
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y04—INFORMATION OR COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES HAVING AN IMPACT ON OTHER TECHNOLOGY AREAS
- Y04S—SYSTEMS INTEGRATING TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO POWER NETWORK OPERATION, COMMUNICATION OR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES FOR IMPROVING THE ELECTRICAL POWER GENERATION, TRANSMISSION, DISTRIBUTION, MANAGEMENT OR USAGE, i.e. SMART GRIDS
- Y04S10/00—Systems supporting electrical power generation, transmission or distribution
- Y04S10/50—Systems or methods supporting the power network operation or management, involving a certain degree of interaction with the load-side end user applications
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Educational Administration (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Public Health (AREA)
- Water Supply & Treatment (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Primary Health Care (AREA)
- Supply And Distribution Of Alternating Current (AREA)
Abstract
A network source load scheduling evaluation system and method based on carbon emission are disclosed, wherein basic information of a power grid, basic information of a power supply and basic information of a load of a power system are collected firstly, then a price demand response model, an excitation demand response model and a network source load coordination scheduling model are established, a scheduling strategy set is obtained by solving through an NSGA-II algorithm, and then a complex power flow tracking algorithm is adopted to calculate the carbon emission amount of each node and branch in the scheduling strategy set; and finally, calculating economic indexes and environmental indexes for the scheduling strategy set, establishing a network source load scheduling index system, realizing the scheduling and interaction effect of comprehensively evaluating network source load coordination scheduling from the aspects of economy and environment, providing more comprehensive data support for scheduling evaluators, including two indexes of a power side and a load side, and clearly reflecting the contribution degree of the power side and the load side to the scheduling strategy.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to a technology in the field of electric power, in particular to a system and a method for network source load scheduling evaluation based on carbon emission.
Background
With the increasing concern of energy problems and climate change problems, the realization of low-carbon development and the reduction of excessive consumption of fossil energy are gradually common targets of various countries and industries. With the development of large-scale renewable energy networking and demand response technologies, the load side is no longer used as a rigid power receiving end, but gradually develops into a flexible load which can be scheduled by a power supply network, so that network-source-load, namely, power grid-power supply-load coordination scheduling is a necessary trend of future power grid development.
At present, an evaluation method capable of comprehensively evaluating the low-carbon benefits generated by network-source-load coordinated scheduling does not exist, and the evaluation of the network-source-load coordinated scheduling is mainly focused on the aspect of economic benefits.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention provides a network source load scheduling evaluation system and method based on carbon emission, aiming at the defects that the evaluation method of the prior art on the carbon emission is single, the system index is lacked, the influence of reactive power on the carbon emission is ignored, the comprehensive index of the correlation and difference between the carbon emission at the user side is not measured, the regional carbon emission index at the power supply side is not measured, the correlation index of the carbon emission and the cost is not measured, and the like.
The invention is realized by the following technical scheme:
the invention relates to a network source load scheduling evaluation system based on carbon emission, which comprises: information acquisition module, scheduling module, carbon flow track module and index evaluation module, wherein: the information acquisition module is connected with a power grid and acquires network structure and operation information, the scheduling module obtains a scheduling strategy set through an NSGA-II algorithm and is respectively connected with the carbon flow tracking module and the index evaluation module and transmits scheduling strategy set information, the carbon flow tracking module is connected with the index evaluation module and obtains and outputs carbon flow information through a complex power flow tracking algorithm, and the index evaluation module outputs various indexes.
The network source load scheduling evaluation method of the system comprises the steps of firstly collecting basic information of a power grid, basic information of a power supply and basic information of loads of a power system, then establishing a price demand response model, an excitation demand response model and a network source load coordination scheduling model, solving through an NSGA-II algorithm to obtain a scheduling strategy set, and then calculating the carbon emission of each node and branch in the scheduling strategy set by adopting a complex power flow tracking algorithm; and finally, calculating the economic index and the environmental index of the scheduling strategy set.
The price demand response model isWherein: cPFor electricity charges after load transfer, DPnew,t=DPold,t+dup,t+ddown,t,λtIs the time of use electricity price at time t.
The excitation demand response model isWherein: dI,t=DInew,t-DIold,t,CIIs the load shedding compensation cost, gamma unit load shedding compensation cost, dI,tThe cutting load at time t.
The network source load coordination scheduling model isWherein: f. of1To coordinate scheduling costs, CGIn order to reduce the running cost of the conventional unit,egen,irepresents the carbon emission, P, of the conventional unit ii,tThe output of the conventional unit i at the time t is shown, and NG shows the number of the conventional units.
The carbon emission is obtained by the following steps:
1) computing node injected powerWherein: siInjecting power for the node i; sjiIs the complex power of line j-i; sGen,iIs the power injected directly into the i node by the generator;
2) calculating the injection power vector S ═ H of each node-1SGenWherein:SGenthe output vector of each generator of the system is taken as the output vector;
The economic indicators comprise: scheduling cost, carbon emission cost fraction, load cost fraction, and power supply cost fraction.
The scheduling cost Cm=f1 mCarbon emission cost ratioRatio of load costPower supply cost ratio cS,m=1-cL,m。
The environment indexes comprise a load side environment index and a power supply side environment index.
The load side environmental indexes comprise: maximum load carbon emissionCarbon emission ratio at maximum loadMean value of carbon emissions loadedStandard deviation of carbon emission under loadAnd line carbon emission losses
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a schematic flow diagram of the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of the system of the present invention;
FIG. 3 is an example baseline load curve;
fig. 4 is an embodiment scheduling policy set pareto.
Detailed Description
As shown in fig. 1, the network resource load scheduling evaluation method in this embodiment includes the following steps:
1) the IEEE30 system was used as the detection system, and the reference load curve for one day is shown in fig. 3. The generator carbon emission intensity (t/MW) is shown in Table 1.
TABLE 1
Generator 1 | Generator 2 | Generator 3 | Generator 4 | Generator 5 | Generator 6 |
0.95 | 0.5 | 1.06 | 0.95 | 1.06 | 1.06 |
2) And establishing a price demand response model and an excitation demand response model.
3) And establishing a network source load coordination scheduling model, and solving through an NSGA-II algorithm to obtain a scheduling strategy set, wherein the pareto frontier of the scheduling strategy set is shown in figure 4.
4) And calculating the carbon emission of each node and branch in the scheduling strategy set by adopting a complex power flow tracking algorithm.
5) Taking the scheduling policy (65017$, 3504t) as an example, the generator region: the 1, 2, 3 and 4 machine sets belong to the area 1; and 5, 6, the unit belongs to the area 2, and the economic index and the environmental index of the unit are calculated.
The economic indicators are shown in table 2.
TABLE 2
Cost of dispatch | Carbon emission cost ratio | Ratio of load cost | Power supply cost ratio |
2709.051283 | 0.160721412 | 1.097831888 | 0.839278588 |
The load side environmental index is shown in table 3.
TABLE 3
The power source side environment index is shown in table 4.
TABLE 4
Maximum regional carbon emission | Maximum area carbon emission ratio | Regional carbon emission mean |
103.7657947 | 2.412694891 | 73.38702433 |
Compared with the prior art, the network source load dispatching index system is established, the dispatching and interaction effects of comprehensive evaluation of network source load coordinated dispatching in the aspects of economy and environment are achieved, more comprehensive data support can be provided for dispatching evaluation personnel, the power supply side and the load side are included, and the contribution degree of the power supply side and the load side to the dispatching strategy can be clearly reflected.
The foregoing embodiments may be modified in many different ways by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention, which is defined by the appended claims and all changes that come within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are therefore intended to be embraced therein.
Claims (8)
1. A network source load scheduling evaluation method of a network source load scheduling evaluation system based on carbon emission is characterized in that the network source load scheduling evaluation system comprises: information acquisition module, scheduling module, carbon flow track module and index evaluation module, wherein: the information acquisition module is connected with a power grid and acquires network structure and operation information, the scheduling module obtains a scheduling strategy set through an NSGA-II algorithm and is respectively connected with the carbon flow tracking module and the index evaluation module and transmits scheduling strategy set information, the carbon flow tracking module is connected with the index evaluation module and obtains and outputs carbon flow information through a complex power flow tracking algorithm, and the index evaluation module outputs various indexes;
the network source load scheduling evaluation method comprises the steps of firstly collecting basic information of a power grid, basic information of a power supply and basic information of a load of a power system, then establishing a price demand response model, an excitation demand response model and a network source load coordination scheduling model, solving through an NSGA-II algorithm to obtain a scheduling strategy set, and then calculating the carbon emission of each node and branch in the scheduling strategy set by adopting a complex power flow tracking algorithm; and finally, calculating the economic index and the environmental index of the scheduling strategy set.
4. The carbon emission-based grid source load scheduling evaluation method according to claim 3, wherein the grid source load coordination scheduling model isWherein: f. of1To coordinate scheduling costs, CGIn order to reduce the running cost of the conventional unit,egen,irepresents the carbon emission, P, of the conventional unit ii,tThe output of the conventional unit i at the time t is shown, and NG shows the number of the conventional units.
5. The method for evaluating carbon emission-based grid source load scheduling as claimed in claim 4, wherein the carbon emission is obtained by the following steps:
1) computing node injected powerWherein: siInjecting power for the node i; sjiIs the complex power of line j-i; sGen,iIs the power injected directly into the i node by the generator;
2) calculating the injection power vector S ═ H of each node-1SGenWherein:SGenthe output vector of each generator of the system is taken as the output vector;
6. The carbon emission-based grid source load scheduling evaluation method according to claim 5, wherein the economic indicators comprise: scheduling cost, carbon emission cost fraction, load cost fraction, and power supply cost fraction.
8. The carbon emission-based grid source load scheduling evaluation method according to claim 1, wherein the environmental indicators include a load-side environmental indicator and a power-supply-side environmental indicator, wherein: the load-side environmental index includes: maximum load carbon emissionCarbon emission ratio at maximum loadMean value of carbon emissions loadedStandard deviation of carbon emission under loadAnd line carbon emission lossesThe power supply side environmental indexes include: maximum regional carbon emissionMaximum area carbon emission ratioRegional carbon emission meanAnd regional carbon emission standard deviation
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201710406692.3A CN108985532B (en) | 2017-06-02 | 2017-06-02 | Network source load scheduling evaluation system and method based on carbon emission |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201710406692.3A CN108985532B (en) | 2017-06-02 | 2017-06-02 | Network source load scheduling evaluation system and method based on carbon emission |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN108985532A CN108985532A (en) | 2018-12-11 |
CN108985532B true CN108985532B (en) | 2021-05-11 |
Family
ID=64501493
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN201710406692.3A Active CN108985532B (en) | 2017-06-02 | 2017-06-02 | Network source load scheduling evaluation system and method based on carbon emission |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN108985532B (en) |
Families Citing this family (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN109376967B (en) * | 2018-12-14 | 2021-09-14 | 国网山东省电力公司经济技术研究院 | Method for evaluating environmental protection characteristics of power grid planning |
CN110705791A (en) * | 2019-09-30 | 2020-01-17 | 哈尔滨工程大学 | NSGA-II-based ocean platform multi-objective scheduling optimization method |
CN111080099B (en) * | 2019-12-04 | 2023-06-02 | 上海交通大学 | Comprehensive energy system scheduling evaluation method and system based on carbon emission management |
CN111277006B (en) * | 2020-02-28 | 2022-05-27 | 东北电力大学 | Low-carbon control method for power system containing gas-coal-wind turbine generator |
CN112837181B (en) * | 2021-02-23 | 2022-10-04 | 国网山东省电力公司经济技术研究院 | Scheduling method of comprehensive energy system considering demand response uncertainty |
CN114362160B (en) * | 2022-01-11 | 2024-01-30 | 浙江华云电力工程设计咨询有限公司 | Carbon emission and green electricity tracking method and device based on proportion equipartition principle |
CN115238597B (en) * | 2022-09-23 | 2023-04-07 | 国网浙江省电力有限公司宁波供电公司 | Construction method of source network carbon-loaded emission model of park level comprehensive energy system |
Citations (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN103426032A (en) * | 2013-07-25 | 2013-12-04 | 广东电网公司电力科学研究院 | Method for economically and optimally dispatching cogeneration units |
CN103577892A (en) * | 2013-10-30 | 2014-02-12 | 河海大学 | Progressive intelligent power distribution system scheduling method |
CN103617460A (en) * | 2013-12-06 | 2014-03-05 | 天津大学 | Double-layer optimization planning and designing method for combined cooling, heating and power micro-grid system |
KR20150066865A (en) * | 2013-12-09 | 2015-06-17 | 한국남동발전 주식회사 | Coal Operation Management System |
CN105375472A (en) * | 2015-11-23 | 2016-03-02 | 国家电网公司 | Intelligent power distribution network low-carbon benefit evaluation method |
CN105550771A (en) * | 2015-12-09 | 2016-05-04 | 中冶南方工程技术有限公司 | Multi-objective optimization method of steelmaking-continuous casting production scheduling based on NSGA-II |
CN105631528A (en) * | 2015-09-22 | 2016-06-01 | 长沙理工大学 | NSGA-II and approximate dynamic programming-based multi-objective dynamic optimal power flow solving method |
Family Cites Families (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US9311615B2 (en) * | 2010-11-24 | 2016-04-12 | International Business Machines Corporation | Infrastructure asset management |
US9940599B2 (en) * | 2013-08-20 | 2018-04-10 | General Electric Company | Systems and methods for generating solution recommendations for power plant operation |
-
2017
- 2017-06-02 CN CN201710406692.3A patent/CN108985532B/en active Active
Patent Citations (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN103426032A (en) * | 2013-07-25 | 2013-12-04 | 广东电网公司电力科学研究院 | Method for economically and optimally dispatching cogeneration units |
CN103577892A (en) * | 2013-10-30 | 2014-02-12 | 河海大学 | Progressive intelligent power distribution system scheduling method |
CN103617460A (en) * | 2013-12-06 | 2014-03-05 | 天津大学 | Double-layer optimization planning and designing method for combined cooling, heating and power micro-grid system |
KR20150066865A (en) * | 2013-12-09 | 2015-06-17 | 한국남동발전 주식회사 | Coal Operation Management System |
CN105631528A (en) * | 2015-09-22 | 2016-06-01 | 长沙理工大学 | NSGA-II and approximate dynamic programming-based multi-objective dynamic optimal power flow solving method |
CN105375472A (en) * | 2015-11-23 | 2016-03-02 | 国家电网公司 | Intelligent power distribution network low-carbon benefit evaluation method |
CN105550771A (en) * | 2015-12-09 | 2016-05-04 | 中冶南方工程技术有限公司 | Multi-objective optimization method of steelmaking-continuous casting production scheduling based on NSGA-II |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN108985532A (en) | 2018-12-11 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN108985532B (en) | Network source load scheduling evaluation system and method based on carbon emission | |
Li et al. | Optimal dispatch strategy for integrated energy systems with CCHP and wind power | |
Howard et al. | Modeling the carbon budget of the Australian electricity sector's transition to renewable energy | |
Sun et al. | Analyzing sustainable power supply chain performance: Evidence from China’s provincial regions | |
Safina et al. | Paradox of alternative energy consumption: Lean or profligacy? | |
Cheng et al. | Carbon emission flow: from electricity network to multiple energy systems | |
Windarta et al. | Application of LEAP model on long-term electricity demand forecasting in Indonesia, period 2010-2025 | |
Wu et al. | Input–output efficiency model of urban green-energy development from the perspective of a low-carbon economy | |
Jia et al. | Robust expansion planning model of integrated energy system with energy hubs integrated | |
Shaikh et al. | Wind–PV-Based Hybrid DC Microgrid (DCMG) Development: An Experimental Investigation and Comparative Economic Analysis | |
Karier et al. | How hydropower enhances the capacity value of renewables and energy efficiency | |
CN103023018A (en) | Electrical power system multi-target optimal power flow implementation method and device | |
Cai et al. | Incentive policy for battery energy storage systems based on economic evaluation considering flexibility and reliability benefits | |
Yan et al. | THE ECONOMY OF POWER GENERATION TECHNOLOGIES IN CHINA: A REVIEW. | |
Zhang et al. | Utilization of the non-fossil fuel target and its implications in China | |
Zhao et al. | Prospective optimization of CCHP system under multi-scenarios | |
Zhou et al. | Digital twins for flexibility service provision from industrial energy systems | |
Li et al. | Scenario analysis for optimal allocation of China's electricity production system | |
Muratori | Role of electric vehicles in the us power sector transition: A system-level perspective | |
Tian et al. | Optimal design of integrated energy supply system for continuous greenhouse effect: a study on carbon emission and operational cost | |
Pashangpour et al. | Optimized scheduling for electric lift trucks in a sugarcane agro-industry based on thermal, biomass and solar resources | |
Lazaroiu et al. | Editorial special issue: holistic transition of urban systems towards positive and resilient energy areas incorporating renewable energy generation | |
Rouhani et al. | The Renewable Portfolio Standard’s Impacts on the California’s Electricity Sector | |
Klimenko et al. | Comparing thermodynamic efficiency of power supply systems with separate and combined generation of produced energy carriers | |
Monsalve et al. | Modelling and coupling multi-energy systems for supplying methane to transportation sector in Germany |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PB01 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
GR01 | Patent grant |