CN108959791A - A kind of Phased Array Radar Resource Scheduling efficiency level passs rank appraisal procedure - Google Patents
A kind of Phased Array Radar Resource Scheduling efficiency level passs rank appraisal procedure Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN108959791A CN108959791A CN201810764761.2A CN201810764761A CN108959791A CN 108959791 A CN108959791 A CN 108959791A CN 201810764761 A CN201810764761 A CN 201810764761A CN 108959791 A CN108959791 A CN 108959791A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- index
- level
- array radar
- scheduling
- phased array
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F30/00—Computer-aided design [CAD]
- G06F30/20—Design optimisation, verification or simulation
Abstract
The present invention relates to a kind of Phased Array Radar Resource Scheduling efficiency levels to pass rank appraisal procedure, including: building phased-array radar effectiveness evaluation index system first；Secondly it completes two-level index weight using Hierarchy Analysis Method quantitatively to calculate, reducing subjective factor influences；The weight for improving entropy weight method acquisition first class index is utilized again；Finally multi-level measures of effectiveness is completed using composite index assessment models.
Description
Technical field
The present invention relates to Phased Array Radar Resource Scheduling measures of effectiveness fields.
Technical background
Advanced effective resource scheduling management technology is the multiplier of phased-array radar ability to work, for phased-array radar
Performance most preferably plays significant.Phased-array radar scheduling measures of effectiveness technology effectively comments scheduling system call ability
Estimate, is the tool for measuring dispatching effect；Reference can be provided for test, the improvement of dispatching algorithm, be preferably provided for dispatching algorithm
Technical identification.
Currently, Phased Array Radar Resource Scheduling measures of effectiveness is calculated mainly for single index, as scheduling success ratio,
Dispatch the indexs such as deviation ratio；These scattered Indexes Comparisons are unilateral and are difficult to the dispatching of comprehensive Reactive scheduling system, lack
Effective synthetic effectiveness evaluation.Commonly based on the measures of effectiveness of artificial neural network, a large amount of sample learning is needed；However from
Adaption scheduling is usually adjusted according to environmental change, therefore dispatches sample and do not have typicalness；In addition this assessment mode is usual
It is the opinion rating for providing scheduling efficiency, does not export as a result, Relative Fuzzy quantitatively.
For scheduling of resource measures of effectiveness problem, rational evaluation index is designed, and with effective assessment models for mentioning
It is scientific most important to rise assessment.Be contemplated that multi -index in index Design, each index weights choose it is upper should focus on it is subjective and
It is objective combine, comprehensive effectiveness calculates the ability of scheduling of should reflecting comprehensively, avoid unilateral.
Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) be the 1970s the U.S. plan strategies for scholar T.L.Satty proposition a kind of qualitative and quantitative mutually tie
The method of decision analysis of conjunction constructs decision judgment matrix, then comprehensive determining each factor significance level by way of comparing two-by-two,
It offers convenience to weight calculation.Comentropy is 1948 by proposing when Shannon research information metric question, is uncertain
With estimating for information content；Entropy assessment is bigger according to certain metrics evaluation difference, and entropy is with regard to smaller, the bigger principle of the importance of index
Weight computing is carried out, the objectivity of its weight computing is embodied.Composite index law has important value in thoroughly evaluating things, because
This plays a significant role when in overall merit phased-array radar dispatches efficiency.
Phased Array Radar Resource Scheduling efficiency multilevel evaluation constructs relatively reasonable scheduling of resource measures of effectiveness and refers to
Mark system；With analytic hierarchy process (AHP), each index weights of the scientific methods such as entropy assessment acquisition are improved, subjectiveness and objectiveness combines, really
It is scientific to protect weight；Finally the assessment models based on composite index quantitatively calculate scheduling efficiency index.Combine scheduling system
Indices, overlapping design assesses element, final to realize the scheduling scientific and effective assessment of efficiency, makes that result is relatively reliable, meets
It is practical.
Summary of the invention
The present invention provides a kind of scientific and effective appraisal procedure for Phased Array Radar Resource Scheduling measures of effectiveness, and emphasis solves
Measures of effectiveness not comprehensively, without it is quantitative the problems such as, estimation flow is scientific and reasonable, realizes and scheduling of resource efficiency is quantitatively evaluated.
Realize technical solution of the invention: the characteristics of being executed according to phased-array radar task schedule constructs resource tune
Effectiveness evaluation index system is spent, 4 first class index and 13 two-level index are established；Pass through the hands such as formula calculating, test statistics
Section obtains each parameter value, and is normalized；The weight that two-level index is calculated using analytic hierarchy process (AHP), passes through weighted calculation
Obtain each first class index；The weight of each first class index is obtained using improved information Entropy Method；Then pass through improved information Entropy Method
Obtain first class index weight；Scheduling efficiency is quantitatively evaluated finally by using composite index law.
Beneficial effects of the present invention: the present invention establishes scheduling of resource effectiveness evaluation index system, and each index is classified
It is comprehensive, perfect factor of evaluation；Each two-level index for considering scheduling efficiency is obtained with analytic hierarchy process (AHP) development of judgment matrix
Its weight vector, it is scientific and reasonable, support is provided for further assessment；First class index uses objective weighted model, and weights are more
With objectivity, influence of the objective indicator parameter to scheduling measures of effectiveness can be more embodied；Multilayer, power method of assigning combine more, simultaneous
Have subjectivity and objectivity, evaluation process is closer practical；So that scheduling measures of effectiveness result is more scientific reliable.This method is logical
Cross and integrate each index parameter, improve evaluation process science, be also the assessment of Phased Array Radar Resource Scheduling technology, test,
Improvement provides important technical support, is of great significance.
1,2 present invention is further described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawing.
Detailed description of the invention
1 Phased Array Radar Resource Scheduling effectiveness evaluation index system of attached drawing.
2 Phased Array Radar Resource Scheduling measures of effectiveness flow chart of attached drawing.
Specific embodiment
Specific implementation process of the present invention is as follows:
Step 1 constructs Phased Array Radar Resource Scheduling effectiveness evaluation index system；Around task schedule effect, resource benefit
First class index is established with four main aspects such as rate, ability to work and reliability；Each first class index includes several two-level index；
Each two-level index of Step 2 can calculate (such as scheduling success ratio, time migration rate, time availability by formula
Deng), scheduling system provide (search capability, tracking ability etc.) and test of many times statistics obtain (when such as fault-tolerant ability, fault-free
Between be spaced etc.) etc. means obtain；If k-th of first class index is made of q two-level index, it is denoted as Uk(x1,x2,...,xq)；
3 regulation index normalized of Step is not easy to comprehensive effectiveness calculating due to each index dimension disunity, need to be into
Row normalization calculates.Profit evaluation model index and cost type index are normalized according to formula 1 and formula 2 respectively:
In formula, xh' it is normalized value, xhFor actual value, xmin、xmaxThe respectively corresponding minimum value of corresponding index and maximum
Value is convenient for unified representation after two kinds of index normalization.
After normalization, k-th of first class index composition can be denoted as Uk′(x1′,x2′,...,xq′)；
Two-level index weight computing under each first class index of Step 4.
(1) it calculates and obtains corresponding two-level index weight.
A) each index factor compares establish judgment matrix two-by-two:
B) every a line product of judgment matrix is calculated, and calculates its q th Root:
Obtain βk=(β1,β2,...,βq)T；
C) to vector βkStandardize, have:
Then Wk (a)=(w1 (a),w2 (a),...,wq (a))TFor the weighted value of two-level index each under first class index；
D) Maximum characteristic root of judgment matrix A is calculated
E) consistency checkAs CR < 0.1, meet consistency, weight is available；Otherwise
It goes to step a)；
(2) the weight vectors W to two-level index successively calculated by (1), (2) step(a)=(W1 (a),W2 (a),W3 (a),
W4 (a))T。
Step 5 seeks first class index value.
Step 6 calculates the weight of appraisal parameters (first class index).
(1) according to the set of factors of scheduling measures of effectiveness, according to " Delphi method " regulation and criterion, design objective weight expert
Application form, expert give a mark to each index importance, with the importance of a certain index of determination.Survey feedback to n experts
As a result it is arranged, obtains scheduling measures of effectiveness matrix B.
bijEvaluation for i-th bit expert to j-th of level-one evaluation index.
(2) evaluating matrix normalizes.
Here useless to use parameter bijIt is normalized with the ratio of jth item index, and uses following formula:
It is available:
(3) jth item first class index output information entropy is calculated
(4) weight of jth item first class index is calculated
(5) weight vectors of first class index are obtained:
W(b)=(w1 (b),w2 (b),w3 (b),w4 (b))T (13)
Step 7 calculates scheduling efficiency index.
The above evaluation process is applied to the measures of effectiveness of specific scheduling of resource, and test of many times, verifying assessment by Step 8
As a result validity.
Claims (4)
1. a kind of Phased Array Radar Resource Scheduling efficiency level passs rank appraisal procedure, it is characterised in that:
Step 1: building Phased Array Radar Resource Scheduling effectiveness evaluation index system；
Step 2: it is calculated by formula, scheduling system provides and test of many times counts the means such as acquisition and obtains two-level index；If
K-th of first class index is made of q two-level index, is denoted as Uk(x1,x2,...,xq)；
Step 3: regulation index normalized, index composition can be denoted as Uk′(x1′,x2′,...,xq′)；
Step 4: calculating each two-level index weight using AHP method, to obtain weight vector:
W(a)=(W1 (a),W2 (a),W3 (a),W4 (a))T；
Step 5: according to two-level index to which assessment obtains first class index:
Step 6: using the weight for improving entropy assessment calculating appraisal parameters, the i.e. weight of first class index:
W(b)=(w1 (b),w2 (b),w3 (b),w4 (b))T；
Step 7: scheduling efficiency index is calculated according to comprehensive index assessment model:
Step 8: the test and verifying of efficiency estimation method are dispatched.
2. a kind of Phased Array Radar Resource Scheduling efficiency level according to claim 1 passs rank appraisal procedure, feature exists
In: scheduling effectiveness evaluation index system is constructed in the Step1, establishes 4 first class index and 13 two-level index, is money
The basis of source scheduling measures of effectiveness.
3. Phased Array Radar Resource Scheduling efficiency level according to claim 1 passs rank appraisal procedure, it is characterised in that: institute
The calculation method of first class index weight vectors in the Step6 stated obtains scheduling measures of effectiveness matrix by expert investigation table, will change
Into information Entropy Method applied to index weights calculate.
4. Phased Array Radar Resource Scheduling efficiency level according to claim 1 passs rank appraisal procedure, it is characterised in that: institute
Efficiency is dispatched in the Step7 stated and carries out quantitative calculating using composite index assessment models, combines first class index and two-level index
As a result, multi-level weighted calculation arrive final efficiency value.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201810764761.2A CN108959791A (en) | 2018-07-12 | 2018-07-12 | A kind of Phased Array Radar Resource Scheduling efficiency level passs rank appraisal procedure |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201810764761.2A CN108959791A (en) | 2018-07-12 | 2018-07-12 | A kind of Phased Array Radar Resource Scheduling efficiency level passs rank appraisal procedure |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN108959791A true CN108959791A (en) | 2018-12-07 |
Family
ID=64483908
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201810764761.2A Pending CN108959791A (en) | 2018-07-12 | 2018-07-12 | A kind of Phased Array Radar Resource Scheduling efficiency level passs rank appraisal procedure |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN108959791A (en) |
Cited By (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN109872086A (en) * | 2019-03-19 | 2019-06-11 | 南京大学 | A kind of Phased Array Radar Resource Scheduling scheme evaluation system of task based access control section |
| CN111157963A (en) * | 2020-01-31 | 2020-05-15 | 中国人民解放军32802部队 | Online evaluation method for interference effect of active phased array radar |
| CN112598325A (en) * | 2020-12-31 | 2021-04-02 | 国泰新点软件股份有限公司 | Public resource transaction efficiency evaluation method, device, system and storage medium |
| CN112907151A (en) * | 2021-04-07 | 2021-06-04 | 中国人民武装警察部队工程大学 | Effectiveness evaluation method for earthquake relief equipment based on utility function method |
Citations (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN105469196A (en) * | 2015-11-18 | 2016-04-06 | 山东科技大学 | Comprehensive evaluation method and comprehensive evaluation system for evaluating mine construction project process |
| CN107563680A (en) * | 2017-10-20 | 2018-01-09 | 广东电网有限责任公司电力科学研究院 | A kind of distribution network reliability evaluation method based on AHP and entropy assessment |
-
2018
- 2018-07-12 CN CN201810764761.2A patent/CN108959791A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN105469196A (en) * | 2015-11-18 | 2016-04-06 | 山东科技大学 | Comprehensive evaluation method and comprehensive evaluation system for evaluating mine construction project process |
| CN107563680A (en) * | 2017-10-20 | 2018-01-09 | 广东电网有限责任公司电力科学研究院 | A kind of distribution network reliability evaluation method based on AHP and entropy assessment |
Cited By (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN109872086A (en) * | 2019-03-19 | 2019-06-11 | 南京大学 | A kind of Phased Array Radar Resource Scheduling scheme evaluation system of task based access control section |
| CN111157963A (en) * | 2020-01-31 | 2020-05-15 | 中国人民解放军32802部队 | Online evaluation method for interference effect of active phased array radar |
| CN112598325A (en) * | 2020-12-31 | 2021-04-02 | 国泰新点软件股份有限公司 | Public resource transaction efficiency evaluation method, device, system and storage medium |
| CN112907151A (en) * | 2021-04-07 | 2021-06-04 | 中国人民武装警察部队工程大学 | Effectiveness evaluation method for earthquake relief equipment based on utility function method |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN108959791A (en) | A kind of Phased Array Radar Resource Scheduling efficiency level passs rank appraisal procedure | |
| Chen et al. | Project delivery system selection of construction projects in China | |
| CN113792982A (en) | Scientific and technological service quality assessment method and device based on combined weighting and fuzzy gray clustering | |
| Stock et al. | Indicators for dating business cycles: Cross-history selection and comparisons | |
| CN111191906A (en) | Systematic implementation benefit evaluation method for technical standards of large and medium-sized enterprises | |
| CN105469196A (en) | Comprehensive evaluation method and comprehensive evaluation system for evaluating mine construction project process | |
| Costantini et al. | A hierarchical procedure for the combination of forecasts | |
| CN103632203A (en) | Distribution network power supply area division method based on comprehensive evaluation | |
| CN109800989A (en) | Using the supplier selection method of evaluation index classification overall merit | |
| CN107146009B (en) | Water supply pipe network operation state evaluation method | |
| CN104331773A (en) | Comprehensive assessment method for power network planning schemes | |
| CN106127388A (en) | The energy efficiency evaluating method of high energy-consuming enterprises | |
| CN108509385A (en) | A kind of device fabrication supplier evaluation method | |
| CN107169655A (en) | A kind of method and device of preferred power distribution network project compatibility | |
| CN111242471A (en) | Index system for selecting selling enterprises in supply chain with farmer cooperative as leading factor | |
| Li et al. | Grey relational decision making model of three-parameter interval grey number based on AHP and DEA | |
| CN103700030A (en) | Grey rough set-based power grid construction project post-evaluation index weight assignment method | |
| Feylizadeh et al. | Manufacturing performance measurement using fuzzy multi-attribute utility theory and Z-number | |
| CN115358437A (en) | Power supply load prediction method based on convolutional neural network | |
| CN114862144A (en) | Weight determination method suitable for performance evaluation | |
| CN114139940A (en) | Generalized demand side resource network load interaction level assessment method based on combined empowerment-cloud model | |
| CN107644285A (en) | The screening of power sales profitability evaluation index and Weight Determination and system | |
| Piwowarski et al. | Application of VMCM method (Vector Measure Construction Methods) to estimate consumer’s quality of life in EU countries–dynamic perspective | |
| Liu et al. | Use clustering to improve neural network in financial time series prediction | |
| CN113011779A (en) | Energy consumption price compensation method and device based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| CB02 | Change of applicant information | ||
| CB02 | Change of applicant information |
Address after: 210003 No. 346, Zhongshan North Road, Jiangsu, Nanjing Applicant after: 724 Research Institute of China Shipbuilding Corp. Address before: 210003 No. 346, Zhongshan North Road, Jiangsu, Nanjing Applicant before: 724TH RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF CHINA SHIPBUILDING INDUSTRY Corp. |
|
| WD01 | Invention patent application deemed withdrawn after publication | ||
| WD01 | Invention patent application deemed withdrawn after publication |
Application publication date: 20181207 |