CN108959249A - A kind of evaluation method of periodical best paper - Google Patents
A kind of evaluation method of periodical best paper Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN108959249A CN108959249A CN201810645466.5A CN201810645466A CN108959249A CN 108959249 A CN108959249 A CN 108959249A CN 201810645466 A CN201810645466 A CN 201810645466A CN 108959249 A CN108959249 A CN 108959249A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- paper
- evaluation
- papers
- evaluation index
- data
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F40/00—Handling natural language data
- G06F40/20—Natural language analysis
- G06F40/205—Parsing
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F18/00—Pattern recognition
- G06F18/20—Analysing
- G06F18/22—Matching criteria, e.g. proximity measures
Abstract
The invention discloses a kind of evaluation method of periodical best paper, this method includes obtaining the respective evaluation index initial data of more papers；The evaluation index initial data is used to evaluate the superiority and inferiority of paper；Calculate separately the respective time standard conversion factor of more papers；The evaluation index initial data that more papers respectively contain is multiplied with the conversion factor that more papers respectively contain respectively and obtains data after respective evaluation index is converted；It is calculated using data after the respective evaluation index conversion of more papers of the Comprehensive Appraisal of Distance method to acquisition, obtains the evaluation ranking results of more paper superiority and inferiority.The evaluation method of periodical best paper provided by the present application introduces evaluation index time standard system, provides a set of fair, just, scientific and rational paper multi-index evaluation.The superior and inferior evaluating of paper can be made more scientific and reasonable, it is more convincing.
Description
Technical field
The present invention relates to journal appraising technical fields, outstanding more particularly to a kind of periodical for introducing time standard system
The evaluation method of paper.
Background technique
Important component of the academic journal as scientific research activity has report and propagates ambit scientific discovery
With the function of achievements of technology innovation.With the development of modern science and technology, academic level constantly improves, the quality of technical paper is bound to
It needs to be promoted.In order to attract excellent articles, accelerate the quality for promoting paper, all kinds of academic journals all put into effect a variety of thesis rewarding political affairs
Plan is to be realized by competition best paper mostly, it is seen then that fair, just, scientific and rational journal appraising system is to competition
Best paper has great importance, and has certain promotion to the promotion of Quality of Papers.The competition of best paper is more at present
Using factors such as download, mean cited times as foundation.However, causing to comment since the time of every paper publishing or month are inconsistent
It is not reciprocity when valence, it delivers that the time is more early, and the indexs such as download, mean cited times are more advantageous, there is potential injustice shadow
It rings；Secondly, paper is in a manner of publishing thesis and being cited with reference to may not all be embodied, especially one line of facing to manufacture, government or enterprise's thing
Industry administrative decision department etc., be exactly with reference to academic paper in order to produce it is practical it is more convenient, quick, economic benefit is more preferable, or
Keep the decision scheme of decision-making section more scientific rationally.Therefore, evaluation index time standard system how is introduced, is constructed a set of
Fair, just, scientific and rational paper multi-index evaluation is that those skilled in the art's technology urgently to be solved is asked
Topic.
Summary of the invention
The present invention provides a kind of evaluation methods of periodical best paper.
The present invention provides following schemes:
A kind of evaluation method of periodical best paper, comprising:
Obtain the respective evaluation index initial data of more papers；The evaluation index initial data is for evaluating paper
Superiority and inferiority；
Calculate separately the respective time standard conversion factor of more papers；The calculation formula of the conversion factor are as follows:
Ki=(T-Ti)/∑(T-Ti) i=1 ... n,
In formula: T is to evaluate annual first phase paper to publish time gap of the time to evaluation time, TiWhen being published for paper
Between；
Described in the evaluation index initial data that more papers respectively contain and more papers are respectively contained respectively
Conversion factor, which is multiplied, obtains data after respective evaluation index is converted；
It is calculated, is obtained using data after the respective evaluation index conversion of more papers of the Comprehensive Appraisal of Distance method to acquisition
Much evaluation ranking results of piece paper superiority and inferiority.
Preferred: the evaluation index initial data includes multiple evaluation index initial data, respectively that more papers are each
Self-contained the multiple evaluation index initial data and the conversion factor that more papers respectively contain are multiplied acquisition respectively
Data after respective multiple evaluation index conversions.
It is preferred: the multiple evaluation index initial data include download initial data, mean cited times initial data,
Line reads number initial data, collection number initial data, comment item number initial data and recommended amounts initial data.
Preferred: the Comprehensive Appraisal of Distance method includes:
The evaluations matrix based on Comprehensive Appraisal of Distance method is constructed, and change is normalized in data after the conversion of each evaluation index
Standardized data matrix is obtained after change；
Optimal case vector sum Worst scheme vector is calculated using standardized data matrix；
More papers are calculated separately respectively at a distance from optimal case vector sum Worst scheme vector, and calculate separately to obtain
More papers respectively with the relative proximity of optimal case, are arranged the more respective relative proximities of paper of acquisition
Sequence obtains evaluation ranking results.
It is preferred: the formula of evaluations matrix of the building based on Comprehensive Appraisal of Distance method are as follows:
X'=(X'ij)n×m
In formula: n is paper record, and m is the number of data after evaluation index conversion；
Normalization variation formula are as follows:
Standardized data matrix are as follows:
Y'=(Y'ij)n×m。
It is preferred: optimal case vector sum Worst scheme vector to be calculated using standardized data matrix, comprising: optimal
Vector (Zmax) and most bad vector (Zmin) acquisition is calculated by following formula respectively:
Zmax=(Y'max1,Y'max2,Y'max3,Y'max4,Y'max5,Y'max6....Y'maxm)
Zmin=(Y'min1,Y'min2,Y'min3,Y'min4,Y'min5,Y'min6....Y'maxm)
I-th of evaluation paper and optimal and most bad scheme distance are calculated with following formula respectively:
It is preferred: and calculate separately to obtain more papers respectively with the relative proximity of optimal case, comprising:
Relative proximities are calculated by following formula:
In formula, CiThe relative proximity that paper and optimal case are evaluated for i-th, works as CiValue is bigger, then evaluates paper and comment
Valence effect is better, and sequence is more forward.
The specific embodiment provided according to the present invention, the invention discloses following technical effects:
By the invention it is possible to realize a kind of evaluation method of periodical best paper, in an implementation mode, this method
It may include obtaining the respective evaluation index initial data of more papers；The evaluation index initial data is for evaluating paper
Superiority and inferiority；Calculate separately the respective time standard conversion factor of more papers；The calculation formula of the conversion factor are as follows:
Ki=(T-Ti)/∑(T-Ti) i=1 ... n,
In formula: T is to evaluate annual first phase paper to publish time gap of the time to evaluation time, TiWhen being published for paper
Between；Respectively by the evaluation index initial data that more papers respectively contain and the conversion system that more papers respectively contain
Number, which is multiplied, obtains data after respective evaluation index is converted；It is commented using more papers of the Comprehensive Appraisal of Distance method to acquisition are respective
Data are calculated after the conversion of valence index, obtain the evaluation ranking results of more paper superiority and inferiority.Periodical provided by the present application is outstanding
The evaluation method of paper introduces evaluation index time standard system, provides a set of fair, just, scientific and rational paper
Multi-index evaluation.The superior and inferior evaluating of paper can be made more scientific and reasonable, it is more convincing.
Certainly, it implements any of the products of the present invention and does not necessarily require achieving all the advantages described above at the same time.
Detailed description of the invention
It in order to more clearly explain the embodiment of the invention or the technical proposal in the existing technology, below will be to institute in embodiment
Attached drawing to be used is needed to be briefly described, it should be apparent that, the accompanying drawings in the following description is only some implementations of the invention
Example, for those of ordinary skill in the art, without creative efforts, can also obtain according to these attached drawings
Obtain other attached drawings.
Fig. 1 is a kind of flow chart of the evaluation method of periodical best paper provided in an embodiment of the present invention.
Specific embodiment
Following will be combined with the drawings in the embodiments of the present invention, and technical solution in the embodiment of the present invention carries out clear, complete
Site preparation description, it is clear that described embodiments are only a part of the embodiments of the present invention, instead of all the embodiments.It is based on
Embodiment in the present invention, those of ordinary skill in the art's every other embodiment obtained belong to what the present invention protected
Range.
Embodiment
It is a kind of evaluation method of periodical best paper provided in an embodiment of the present invention, as shown in Figure 1, the party referring to Fig. 1
Method includes obtaining the respective evaluation index initial data of more papers；The evaluation index initial data is for evaluating the excellent of paper
It is bad；
Calculate separately the respective time standard conversion factor of more papers；The calculation formula of the conversion factor are as follows:
Ki=(T-Ti)/∑(T-Ti) i=1 ... n,
In formula: T is to evaluate annual first phase paper to publish time gap of the time to evaluation time, TiWhen being published for paper
Between；
Described in the evaluation index initial data that more papers respectively contain and more papers are respectively contained respectively
Conversion factor, which is multiplied, obtains data after respective evaluation index is converted；
It is calculated, is obtained using data after the respective evaluation index conversion of more papers of the Comprehensive Appraisal of Distance method to acquisition
Much evaluation ranking results of piece paper superiority and inferiority.
In practical applications, the evaluation index initial data includes multiple evaluation index initial data, respectively by more
The multiple evaluation index initial data that paper respectively contains distinguishes phase with the conversion factor that more papers respectively contain
Multiply data after obtaining respective multiple evaluation index conversions.The multiple evaluation index initial data includes download original number
According to, mean cited times initial data, online reading number initial data, collection number initial data, comment item number initial data and push away
The amount of recommending initial data.More evaluation index initial data can also be determined as needed.
Further, the Comprehensive Appraisal of Distance method includes:
The evaluations matrix based on Comprehensive Appraisal of Distance method is constructed, and change is normalized in data after the conversion of each evaluation index
Standardized data matrix is obtained after change；
Optimal case vector sum Worst scheme vector is calculated using standardized data matrix；
More papers are calculated separately respectively at a distance from optimal case vector sum Worst scheme vector, and calculate separately to obtain
More papers respectively with the relative proximity of optimal case, are arranged the more respective relative proximities of paper of acquisition
Sequence obtains evaluation ranking results.
Construct the formula of the evaluations matrix based on Comprehensive Appraisal of Distance method are as follows:
X'=(X'ij)n×m
In formula: n is paper record, and m is the number of data after evaluation index conversion；
Normalization variation formula are as follows:
Standardized data matrix are as follows:
Y'=(Y'ij)n×m。
Optimal case vector sum Worst scheme vector is calculated using standardized data matrix, comprising: optimal vector
(Zmax) and most bad vector (Zmin) acquisition is calculated by following formula respectively:
Zmax=(Y'max1,Y'max2,Y'max3,Y'max4,Y'max5,Y'max6....Y'maxm)
Zmin=(Y'min1,Y'min2,Y'min3,Y'min4,Y'min5,Y'min6....Y'maxm)
I-th of evaluation paper and optimal and most bad scheme distance are calculated with following formula respectively:
And calculate separately to obtain more papers respectively with the relative proximity of optimal case, comprising:
Relative proximities are calculated by following formula:
In formula, CiThe relative proximity that paper and optimal case are evaluated for i-th, works as CiValue is bigger, then evaluates paper and comment
Valence effect is better, and sequence is more forward.
In order to which the application is described in detail, it is assumed that have n evaluation papers, 6 evaluation indexes.
The primary evaluation index of journal article superiority and inferiority is determined first
Journal article type is more, but each kind of periodical has the representativeness in its field, is needed in practical operation according to every kind of phase
The characteristic of periodical chooses the representational evaluation index for being easier to obtain.This research determines downloading by taking " irrigation and drainage journal " as an example
Amount, mean cited times, online reading number, collection number, comment item number, recommended amounts are the primary evaluation index of paper superiority and inferiority, and recognize
Influence for all indexs to evaluation result is identical.
The time standard of evaluation index
Since the month (time) of every paper publishing is inconsistent, lead to the not reciprocity of evaluation result, it is more early to deliver the time,
The numerical value such as its download, mean cited times, online reading number are bigger, and it is bigger to be evaluated as a possibility that excellent；In order to avoid this not right
Deng evaluating the superiority and inferiority of paper more scientificly, introduce the time standard system of evaluation index, i.e., each index is carried out the time
Standardization, multiplied by time noise coefficient, time conversion factor calculation formula are as follows:
Ki=(T-Ti)/∑(T-Ti) i=1 ... n, (1)
Wherein KiFor time noise coefficient, T be evaluate annual first phase paper publish the time to evaluation time time interval
From (month), Ti(month) is published the time for paper.Then each index is carried out multiplied by time noise coefficient with each index
Time standardization processing, avoids the unbalanced influence of time.
Paper superiority and inferiority overall merit based on Comprehensive Appraisal of Distance method
Comprehensive Appraisal of Distance method be according to the method that is ranked up of degree of closeness of evaluation object and idealization target, be
The evaluation of relative superior or inferior is carried out in existing object, basic step is as follows:
1) iotave evaluation matrix is constructed, after original matrix standardization, finds out in limited scheme optimal case and most
Bad scheme (bad vector indicates with optimal vector and most respectively):
There are n evaluation papers, 6 evaluation indexes, the data of iotave evaluation index can be written as matrix X'=(X'ij)n×6.It is right
Transformation is normalized in index, the matrix after constructing standardization, i.e.,
Normalization obtains matrix Y'=(Y'ij)n×6Afterwards, what the maximum and minimum value of each evaluation index was constituted is optimal
(Zmax) and most bad vector (Zmin) be respectively as follows:
Zmax=(Y'max1,Y'max2,Y'max3,Y'max4,Y'max5,Y'max6) (3)
Zmin=(Y'min1,Y'min2,Y'min3,Y'min4,Y'min5,Y'min6) (4)
Each evaluation paper and optimal and most bad scheme distance are calculated separately, it is more closer better with optimum point, it is got over most bad point
It is remote better.I-th of evaluation paper and optimal and most bad scheme distance are calculated with formula (5) and formula (6) respectively,
3) the relative proximity C i that each evaluation paper and optimal case are calculated according to Comprehensive Appraisal of Distance method, finally leads to
The overall merit for being ranked up to calculating gained relative proximities and realizing best paper is crossed, relative proximities are calculated by formula (7)
It arrives:
In formula, CiThe relative proximity that paper and optimal case are evaluated for i-th, works as CiValue is bigger, then illustrates evaluation opinion
Literary evaluation effect is better.
Below by taking 2016 annual papers as an example, the integrated evaluating method for carrying out best paper is illustrated.
It is calculated using 10 papers delivered in " irrigation and drainage journal " 2016 years as evaluation object, and according to aforementioned index
The calculated achievement data of method carries out overall merit to each piece paper as example.
1, do not consider to publish the paper superior and inferior evaluating of time
Download, mean cited times, online reading number, collection number, comment the item number, recommended amounts for comprehensively considering paper, as
The evaluation index of paper superiority and inferiority, initial data are as follows:
The different paper iotave evaluation data of table 1
| Paper number | Download | Number of references | Online reading | Collect number | Comment on item number | Recommended amounts |
| P1 | 122 | 5 | 23 | 15 | 6 | 3 |
| P2 | 120 | 5 | 41 | 24 | 8 | 5 |
| P3 | 199 | 4 | 47 | 9 | 2 | 1 |
| P4 | 106 | 4 | 52 | 8 | 3 | 1 |
| P5 | 219 | 3 | 31 | 12 | 4 | 2 |
| P6 | 167 | 3 | 25 | 15 | 6 | 4 |
| P7 | 165 | 3 | 62 | 9 | 9 | 5 |
| P8 | 137 | 3 | 41 | 18 | 5 | 1 |
| P9 | 135 | 3 | 38 | 23 | 4 | 1 |
| P10 | 120 | 3 | 58 | 31 | 3 | 1 |
The evaluations matrix based on Comprehensive Appraisal of Distance method is constructed, and is obtained after variation is normalized in each index such as formula
(8) normalized matrix:
Optimal case (Z is calculated using standardized data matrixmax) and Worst scheme vector (Zmin):
Zmax=(0.4522,0.4287,0.4493,0.5472,0.5231,0.5455)
Zmin=(0.2189,0.2572,0.1667,0.1412,0.1162,0.1091)
10 papers are calculated at a distance from optimal case and Worst scheme, and 10 papers and optimal case is calculated
Relative proximity CiAfterwards, to CiIt is ranked up the overall merit for realizing paper superiority and inferiority, calculated result and evaluation result such as 2 institute of table
Show.
2 paper superiority and inferiority comprehensive evaluation result of table
CiValue it is bigger, show that evaluation of estimate is more excellent.In terms of comprehensive evaluation result, paper P2Comprehensive evaluation result it is optimal, opinion
Literary P7Take second place, and the C between the above twoiValue difference very little, paper P4It is worst.It follows that before without time standard,
The trap queuing of paper is P2>P7>P6>P10>P1>P9>P5>P8>P3>P4。
2, the paper superior and inferior evaluating of time is published in consideration
Evaluation index time standard system is introduced, time standard conversion processing is carried out to each index of paper, is originally ground
The time of publishing for studying carefully evaluation paper is Ti=(7,3,3,3,5,8, Isosorbide-5-Nitrae, Isosorbide-5-Nitrae), calculating time noise coefficient according to formula (1) is Ki
=(0.0846,0.1045,0.1045,0.1045,0.0945,0.0796,0.1144,0.0995,0.1144,0.0995).So
Initial data is subjected to time standard conversion afterwards, as a result shown in table 3.
Data are evaluated after the different paper time standardization conversions of table 3
The evaluations matrix based on Comprehensive Appraisal of Distance method is constructed, and is obtained after variation is normalized in each index such as formula
(9) normalized matrix:
Optimal case (Z is calculated using standardized data matrixmax) and Worst scheme vector (Zmin):
Zmax=(0.4291,0.4492,0.4925,0.5378,0.5872,0.6182)
Zmin=(0.2130,0.2054,0.1350,0.1457,0.1191,0.1075)
10 papers are calculated at a distance from optimal case and Worst scheme, and 10 papers and optimal case is calculated
Relative proximity CiAfterwards, to CiIt is ranked up the overall merit for realizing paper superiority and inferiority, calculated result and evaluation result such as 4 institute of table
Show.
Paper superiority and inferiority comprehensive evaluation result after the conversion of 4 time standardization of table
Same CiValue it is bigger, show that evaluation of estimate is more excellent.In terms of comprehensive evaluation result, paper P2Comprehensive evaluation result most
It is excellent, paper P7Take second place, and the C between the above twoiValue difference very little, paper P5It is worst.It follows that after carrying out time standard,
The trap queuing of paper is P2>P7>P10>P9>P1>P6>P3>P8>P4>P5.Contrast table 3 and table 4 are as can be seen that the superiority and inferiority of paper is arranged
Sequence is adjusted, it is seen that time standardization conversion has an impact to the evaluation of paper superiority and inferiority, makes the more scientific conjunction of the superior and inferior evaluating of paper
Reason is more convincing.
In short, the evaluation method of periodical best paper provided by the present application, introduces evaluation index time standard system, mentions
A set of fair, just, scientific and rational paper multi-index evaluation is supplied.It can make the superior and inferior evaluating more section of paper
It learns rationally, it is more convincing.
It should be noted that, in this document, relational terms such as first and second and the like are used merely to a reality
Body or operation are distinguished with another entity or operation, are deposited without necessarily requiring or implying between these entities or operation
In any actual relationship or order or sequence.Moreover, the terms "include", "comprise" or its any other variant are intended to
Non-exclusive inclusion, so that the process, method, article or equipment including a series of elements is not only wanted including those
Element, but also including other elements that are not explicitly listed, or further include for this process, method, article or equipment
Intrinsic element.In the absence of more restrictions, the element limited by sentence "including a ...", it is not excluded that
There is also other identical elements in process, method, article or equipment including the element.
The foregoing is merely illustrative of the preferred embodiments of the present invention, is not intended to limit the scope of the present invention.It is all
Any modification, equivalent replacement, improvement and so within the spirit and principles in the present invention, are all contained in protection scope of the present invention
It is interior.
Claims (7)
1. a kind of evaluation method of periodical best paper, which is characterized in that the described method includes:
Obtain the respective evaluation index initial data of more papers；The evaluation index initial data is for evaluating the excellent of paper
It is bad；
Calculate separately the respective time standard conversion factor of more papers；The calculation formula of the conversion factor are as follows:
Ki=(T-Ti)/∑(T-Ti) i=1 ... n,
In formula: T is to evaluate annual first phase paper to publish time gap of the time to evaluation time, TiThe time is published for paper；
Respectively by the evaluation index initial data that more papers respectively contain and the conversion that more papers respectively contain
Multiplication obtains data after respective evaluation index conversion；
It is calculated, is obtained more using data after the respective evaluation index conversion of more papers of the Comprehensive Appraisal of Distance method to acquisition
The evaluation ranking results of piece paper superiority and inferiority.
2. the evaluation method of periodical best paper according to claim 1, which is characterized in that the evaluation index original number
According to the multiple evaluation index initial data that comprising multiple evaluation index initial data, respectively respectively contains more papers with
The conversion factor that more papers respectively contain is multiplied respectively obtains data after respective multiple evaluation indexes are converted.
3. the evaluation method of periodical best paper according to claim 2, which is characterized in that the multiple evaluation index is former
Beginning data include download initial data, mean cited times initial data, online reading number initial data, collection number initial data,
Comment on item number initial data and recommended amounts initial data.
4. the evaluation method of periodical best paper according to claim 1, which is characterized in that the Comprehensive Appraisal of Distance method
Include:
Construct the evaluations matrix based on Comprehensive Appraisal of Distance method, and will be after variation is normalized in data after the conversion of each evaluation index
Obtain standardized data matrix；
Optimal case vector sum Worst scheme vector is calculated using standardized data matrix；
More papers are calculated separately respectively at a distance from optimal case vector sum Worst scheme vector, and calculate separately to obtain more
Paper respectively with the relative proximity of optimal case, is ranked up the more respective relative proximities of paper of acquisition and obtains
Ranking results must be evaluated.
5. the evaluation method of periodical best paper according to claim 4, which is characterized in that building is commented based on distance synthesis
The formula of the evaluations matrix of valence method are as follows:
X'=(X'ij)n×m
In formula: n is paper record, and m is the number of data after evaluation index conversion；
Normalization variation formula are as follows:
Standardized data matrix are as follows:
Y'=(Y'ij)n×m。
6. the evaluation method of periodical best paper according to claim 5, which is characterized in that utilize standardized data matrix
Optimal case vector sum Worst scheme vector is calculated, comprising: optimal vector (Zmax) and most bad vector (Zmin) pass through respectively
Following formula, which calculates, to be obtained:
Zmax=(Y'max1,Y'max2,Y'max3,Y'max4,Y'max5,Y'max6....Y'maxm)
Zmin=(Y'min1,Y'min2,Y'min3,Y'min4,Y'min5,Y'min6....Y'maxm)
I-th of evaluation paper and optimal and most bad scheme distance are calculated with following formula respectively:
7. the evaluation method of periodical best paper according to claim 6, which is characterized in that and calculate separately to obtain more
Paper respectively with the relative proximity of optimal case, comprising:
Relative proximities are calculated by following formula:
In formula, CiThe relative proximity that paper and optimal case are evaluated for i-th, works as CiValue is bigger, then evaluates journal appraising effect
Fruit is better, and sequence is more forward.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201810645466.5A CN108959249A (en) | 2018-06-21 | 2018-06-21 | A kind of evaluation method of periodical best paper |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201810645466.5A CN108959249A (en) | 2018-06-21 | 2018-06-21 | A kind of evaluation method of periodical best paper |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN108959249A true CN108959249A (en) | 2018-12-07 |
Family
ID=64491718
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201810645466.5A Pending CN108959249A (en) | 2018-06-21 | 2018-06-21 | A kind of evaluation method of periodical best paper |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN108959249A (en) |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN111898903A (en) * | 2020-07-28 | 2020-11-06 | 北京科技大学 | Method and system for evaluating uniformity and comprehensive quality of steel product |
Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN103970754A (en) * | 2013-01-28 | 2014-08-06 | 腾讯科技（深圳）有限公司 | Automatic article selection method and device |
| CN104463594A (en) * | 2013-09-23 | 2015-03-25 | 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 | Method and device for computing object influence |
| CN105404641A (en) * | 2015-10-23 | 2016-03-16 | 华建宇通科技(北京)有限责任公司 | Baseline based journal evaluation method and evaluation apparatus |
-
2018
- 2018-06-21 CN CN201810645466.5A patent/CN108959249A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN103970754A (en) * | 2013-01-28 | 2014-08-06 | 腾讯科技（深圳）有限公司 | Automatic article selection method and device |
| CN104463594A (en) * | 2013-09-23 | 2015-03-25 | 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 | Method and device for computing object influence |
| CN105404641A (en) * | 2015-10-23 | 2016-03-16 | 华建宇通科技(北京)有限责任公司 | Baseline based journal evaluation method and evaluation apparatus |
Non-Patent Citations (2)
| Title |
|---|
| 刘莲花: "基于距离综合评价法的数学核心期刊评价", 《中国科技期刊研究》 * |
| 孟璀 等: "论文学术影响力及其影响因素的实证分析—以CNKI 平台的教育内容分析论文为例", 《科研管理》 * |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN111898903A (en) * | 2020-07-28 | 2020-11-06 | 北京科技大学 | Method and system for evaluating uniformity and comprehensive quality of steel product |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Bagstad et al. | Ecosystem service flows from a migratory species: Spatial subsidies of the northern pintail | |
| Chaiwanarom et al. | Collaborator recommendation in interdisciplinary computer science using degrees of collaborative forces, temporal evolution of research interest, and comparative seniority status | |
| Rudalevige | Executive branch management and presidential unilateralism: Centralization and the issuance of executive orders | |
| Xia et al. | Design of reciprocal recommendation systems for online dating | |
| Maraseni et al. | An assessment of direct on-farm energy use for high value grain crops grown under different farming practices in Australia | |
| CN108959249A (en) | A kind of evaluation method of periodical best paper | |
| Mellaku et al. | Linear programming-based cropland allocation to enhance performance of smallholder crop production: A pilot study in Abaro Kebele, Ethiopia | |
| Mohan Dey et al. | Status and economics of freshwater aquaculture in selected countries of Asia | |
| Gammelgaard et al. | Thirty years of the International Journal of Logistics Management–a retrospective analysis | |
| Hofmeester et al. | No global labor history without Africa: Reciprocal comparison and beyond | |
| CN109165742A (en) | Recommended method, device, storage medium and terminal device | |
| CN104240026A (en) | Product design knowledge management service mechanism and matching method | |
| Rosano-Peña et al. | The Impact of Environmental Regulation and Some Strategies for Improving the Eco-Efficiency of Brazilian Agriculture | |
| Hidayat et al. | The perception on technology acceptance to the behaviors on the use of social media for marketing and its implications on the turnover of creative industry MSMEs in villages | |
| Khan | Growth and inequality in the rural Philippines | |
| Lohr et al. | Local selling decisions and the technical efficiency of organic farms | |
| Bursztyn et al. | How Brazilian congressmen connect: homophily and cohesion in voting and donation networks | |
| Hougaard et al. | Fuzzy efficiency without convexity | |
| Lee et al. | Heterogeneity and its policy implications in GHG emission performance of manufacturing industries | |
| Nabi et al. | Job crafting in public sector | |
| Xiao | Two simple approaches to use of production models in fish stock assessment | |
| Rebs | Quantitative modeling of sustainability in interorganizational supply chains | |
| Nikoghosyan | Graph invariants and large cycles: A survey | |
| Zeshan et al. | An analysis of the economic impact of implementing the INDCs of the 2015 Paris Climate Conference: a CGE approach | |
| Wong | Adoption of Prefabrication and Modular Construction in Development of Malaysia Construction Industry |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |
Application publication date: 20181207 |
|
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |