CN108804813A - A kind of space precise tracking reliability estimation method - Google Patents

A kind of space precise tracking reliability estimation method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN108804813A
CN108804813A CN201810581542.0A CN201810581542A CN108804813A CN 108804813 A CN108804813 A CN 108804813A CN 201810581542 A CN201810581542 A CN 201810581542A CN 108804813 A CN108804813 A CN 108804813A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
engine
reliability
test
weak link
verification
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
CN201810581542.0A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN108804813B (en
Inventor
陈明亮
徐辉
陈泓宇
殷艳媚
陈师
杨成虎
吴焕钟
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Shanghai Institute of Space Propulsion
Original Assignee
Shanghai Institute of Space Propulsion
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Shanghai Institute of Space Propulsion filed Critical Shanghai Institute of Space Propulsion
Priority to CN201810581542.0A priority Critical patent/CN108804813B/en
Publication of CN108804813A publication Critical patent/CN108804813A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN108804813B publication Critical patent/CN108804813B/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F30/00Computer-aided design [CAD]
    • G06F30/10Geometric CAD
    • G06F30/15Vehicle, aircraft or watercraft design

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Geometry (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Aviation & Aerospace Engineering (AREA)
  • Computational Mathematics (AREA)
  • Mathematical Analysis (AREA)
  • Mathematical Optimization (AREA)
  • Pure & Applied Mathematics (AREA)
  • Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
  • Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
  • Testing Of Engines (AREA)

Abstract

The invention discloses a kind of space precise tracking reliability estimation methods, include the following steps:Step 1: proposing a kind of space precise tracking design scheme;Step 2: identifying engine reliability weak link;Step 3: carrying out special reliability test for engine weak link;Step 4: the reliability to weak link is assessed;Step 5: carrying out engine whole aircraft reliability verifies work, engine reliability verification is dissolved into engine design verification test and environmental acceptance test;Step 6: assessing engine reliability.The present invention has the following advantages:1) reliability test number and engine sample number are reduced;2) it reduces rocket engine reliability test and verifies cost;3) shorten the rocket engine lead time;4) low-carbon emission reduction, it is environmentally protective.

Description

A kind of space precise tracking reliability estimation method
Technical field
The present invention relates to spacecraft propulsion system technical field more particularly to a kind of space precise tracking reliability assessments Method.
Background technology
Space precise tracking is the heart of the spacecrafts such as carrier rocket Upper Stage, satellite, and becoming rail posture adjustment for spacecraft carries For power, generally have the function of sway in both directions, repeatedly start, can be long-term in-orbit etc..The reliability of engine is directly related to boat The success or failure that its device emits, flies.
Engine inherent reliability designs, but it is also what production guarantee and verification experimental verification came out, it is necessary to Engine could be fully exposed in design, technique and raw material selection etc. by enough test period and test number (TN) Defect and weak link, and raising reliability is achieved the purpose that by sustained improvement.
Technology status at home and abroad is made a general survey of, space precise tracking reliability assessment mostly uses more increment engine reliability heat The method of test run accumulation.Though the method for more increment engine reliability heat run accumulations is conducive to space precise tracking reliability The adequacy and authenticity of verification, but have the following deficiencies:1) experimentation cost is high;2) test period is very long;3) it is easily introduced low Level quality problems;4) a large amount of propellant combustion increases air carbon emission, is unfavorable for atmospheric environment protection, is pushed away for conventional Into agent, a large amount of toxic gases are will produce.
Invention content
To solve the above problems, the present invention proposes a kind of space precise tracking reliability estimation method, can be used for Space precise tracking reliability index verification, identifies weak link, and direction, reliability assessment are provided for engine product improvement Risk tradeoff when as a result can be also used for that model is supported to select product.
The present invention is realized especially by following technical scheme:
A kind of space precise tracking reliability estimation method, includes the following steps:
Step 1, according to model mission requirements and engine product feature, propose a kind of space precise tracking design side Case;
Step 2 identifies engine reliability weak link, and the mainly link including easy break-down, test is not exclusively covered The link of lid, the link potential dangerous to compositions such as quality and performances;
Step 3 carries out special reliability test for engine weak link, designs engine weak link testpieces, Detailed engine weak link test method is formulated, specific engine weak link special project reliability test is carried out, if hair Motivation weak link special project reliability test can not propose a kind of space precise tracking again by verification, palpus return to step 1 Design scheme;
Step 4 assesses the reliability of weak link, selects suitable Reliability Evaluation Model, and it is suitable to determine Characteristic quantities provide the engine weak link reliability assessment of corresponding confidence level as a result, examining with the test data of step 3 The factors such as experiment funds and test period are considered, if assessed reliability result is more than 0.9999, you can think engine weakness ring Fully examination verification, engine weak link reliability reach 1 to section;
Step 5 carries out the verification work of engine whole aircraft reliability, and engine design side is dissolved into engine reliability verification In case verification test and environmental acceptance test, to reduce test number (TN) and test sample number, the experiment of space precise tracking to the greatest extent Verification is an incremental process, and engine whole aircraft reliability verification process includes design scheme ground run, design side Ground run after the high blank test of case, identification grade dynamic environmental test, high blank test, reliability after identification grade dynamic environmental test Vehicle, batch sampling observation test run are interviewed, if the test run of engine whole aircraft reliability can not again be proposed a kind of by verification, palpus return to step 1 Space precise tracking design scheme;
Step 6 assesses engine reliability, selects Weibull distribution model, selected shape parameter, with engine Cumulative activation number is main characteristic quantity, is provided in conjunction with the test data of step 5 using cumulative operation time as secondary feature amount The engine reliability assessment result of corresponding confidence level.
Compared with prior art, the present invention has the advantages that:
1) reliability test number and engine sample number are reduced;2) reduce rocket engine reliability test verification at This;3) shorten the rocket engine lead time;4) low-carbon emission reduction, it is environmentally protective.
Expansion of the present invention is strong, can be used for space precise tracking reliability assessment, and other kinds of rocket is sent out Motivation reliability assessment also has certain reference.
Description of the drawings
Fig. 1 is a kind of operational flowchart of space precise tracking reliability estimation method of the embodiment of the present invention;
Fig. 2 is a kind of space precise tracking structural schematic diagram;
Fig. 3 is a kind of ejector filler header weld testpieces structural schematic diagram of space precise tracking.
Specific implementation mode
With reference to specific embodiment, the present invention is described in detail.Following embodiment will be helpful to the technology of this field Personnel further understand the present invention, but the invention is not limited in any way.It should be noted that the ordinary skill of this field For personnel, without departing from the inventive concept of the premise, several changes and improvements can also be made.These belong to the present invention Protection domain.
As shown in Figure 1, being a kind of space precise tracking reliability estimation method, packet an embodiment of the present invention provides Fig. 1 Include following steps
Step 1, a kind of space precise tracking of design.Referring to Fig. 2, engine includes mainly thrust chamber, valve and waves Mechanism, thrust chamber include mainly ejector filler head, re-generatively cooled body portion and jet pipe extended segment, and wabbler mechanism includes mainly installation branch Frame waves component.
Step 2 identifies engine reliability weak link.When engine is switched on, propellant filling leads to ejector filler head Portion's weld seam one-way bearing pressure, multiple start operating performance may cause ejector filler header weld fatigue failure, the failure of ejector filler header weld Oxidant and fuel can be caused to contact, ejector filler header weld is to the potential dangerous ring of the compositions such as engine quality and performance Section.
Step 3 carries out special reliability test for engine weak link.It is welded according to engine product ejector filler head Welding line structure size and the welding technique requirement of seam, the completely the same ejector filler header weld testpieces of design welding structure, ginseng See Fig. 3.Pressure cycling test is carried out using 3 sets of ejector filler header weld testpieces, the ozzle on testpieces is connect with hydraulic pressure platform, Pressure rises to 4.2MPa, and removal pressure after pressurize 5s recycles 333 times, interval time 5s, after hydraulic test, has no examination Part is tested to there is deformation or destroy.
Step 4 assesses the reliability of weak link.Using Weibull distribution model, selected shape parameter m is 3.0, confidence level 0.7, according to 20 indexs of engine cumulative activation number, assessment weld seam one-way bearing pressure structural reliability is 0.99991, ejector filler header weld Structural Reliability Evaluation result is more than 0.9999, you can thinks that the weak link is fully examined Card is veritified, ejector filler header weld structural reliability reaches 1.
Step 5 carries out the verification work of engine whole aircraft reliability.Successively carry out design scheme ground run, design scheme Ground run after high blank test, identification grade dynamic environmental test, high blank test, reliability ground after identification grade dynamic environmental test Test run, batch sampling observation test run.It is counted according to engine whole aircraft reliability test situation, engine reliability increment totally 7, engine Cumulative operation time 20140s, engine cumulative activation number 590 times, refers to table 1.
Step 6 assesses engine reliability.Using Weibull distribution model, selected shape parameter m is 3.0, is set Reliability is 0.7, with engine cumulative activation number 20 times for main characteristic quantity, using cumulative operation time 800s as secondary feature Amount provides reliability assessment as a result, assessing engine reliable by engine cumulative activation number in conjunction with the test data of step 5 Degree is 0.9981, is 0.9957 by cumulative operation time assessment engine reliable degree.
Specific embodiments of the present invention are described above.It is to be appreciated that the invention is not limited in above-mentioned Particular implementation, those skilled in the art can make various deformations or amendments within the scope of the claims, this not shadow Ring the substantive content of the present invention.

Claims (1)

1. a kind of space precise tracking reliability estimation method, which is characterized in that this method comprises the following steps:
Step 1, according to model mission requirements and engine product feature, propose a kind of space precise tracking design scheme;
Step 2 identifies engine reliability weak link, including the link of easy break-down, the link of the endless all standing of test, Potential dangerous link is constituted to quality and performance;
Step 3 carries out special reliability test for engine weak link, designs engine weak link testpieces, formulates Detailed engine weak link test method carries out specific engine weak link special project reliability test, if engine Weak link special project reliability test can not propose a kind of space precise tracking design again by verification, palpus return to step 1 Scheme;
Step 4 assesses the reliability of weak link, selects suitable Reliability Evaluation Model, determines suitable reliable Property characteristic quantity, if with the test data of step 3 provide corresponding confidence level engine weak link reliability assessment as a result, assessment Reliability result is more than 0.9999, you can thinking engine weak link, fully examination verification, engine weak link are reliable Degree reaches 1;
Step 5 carries out the verification work of engine whole aircraft reliability, and engine reliability verification is dissolved into engine design and is tested In confirmatory test and environmental acceptance test, to reduce test number (TN) and test sample number, space precise tracking verification experimental verification to the greatest extent It is an incremental process, engine whole aircraft reliability verification process includes design scheme ground run, design scheme height High blank test, reliability ground examination after ground run, identification grade dynamic environmental test after blank test, identification grade dynamic environmental test Vehicle, batch sampling observation test run, if the test run of engine whole aircraft reliability can not propose a kind of space again by verification, palpus return to step 1 Precise tracking design scheme;
Step 6 assesses engine reliability, selects Weibull distribution model, selected shape parameter accumulative with engine Work times are main characteristic quantity, and correspondence is provided in conjunction with the test data of step 5 using cumulative operation time as secondary feature amount The engine reliability assessment result of confidence level.
CN201810581542.0A 2018-06-07 2018-06-07 Reliability assessment method for space rail-controlled engine Active CN108804813B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201810581542.0A CN108804813B (en) 2018-06-07 2018-06-07 Reliability assessment method for space rail-controlled engine

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201810581542.0A CN108804813B (en) 2018-06-07 2018-06-07 Reliability assessment method for space rail-controlled engine

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN108804813A true CN108804813A (en) 2018-11-13
CN108804813B CN108804813B (en) 2022-07-26

Family

ID=64087761

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201810581542.0A Active CN108804813B (en) 2018-06-07 2018-06-07 Reliability assessment method for space rail-controlled engine

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN108804813B (en)

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN109582692A (en) * 2018-11-15 2019-04-05 北京宇航系统工程研究所 A kind of carrier rocket test data interpretation method and system based on formalized description
CN109839267A (en) * 2019-03-12 2019-06-04 北京宇航系统工程研究所 A kind of valve storage period appraisal procedure
CN112182782A (en) * 2020-11-02 2021-01-05 中国运载火箭技术研究院 Carrier rocket environment adaptability analysis method, system, terminal and medium
CN112883497A (en) * 2021-03-22 2021-06-01 中国人民解放军国防科技大学 Aerospace valve reliability assessment method based on multi-source information fusion

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20140047271A1 (en) * 2012-08-13 2014-02-13 Uptime Engineering Gmbh Method for testing the reliability of complex systems
CN104535324A (en) * 2014-11-07 2015-04-22 沈阳黎明航空发动机(集团)有限责任公司 Low-cycle life control method of engine
CN105677991A (en) * 2016-01-11 2016-06-15 中国电子科技集团公司第十研究所 Reliability design optimization method for avionic device
CN106529090A (en) * 2016-12-12 2017-03-22 中国航天标准化研究所 Evaluation method of reliability of aerospace electronic product

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20140047271A1 (en) * 2012-08-13 2014-02-13 Uptime Engineering Gmbh Method for testing the reliability of complex systems
CN104535324A (en) * 2014-11-07 2015-04-22 沈阳黎明航空发动机(集团)有限责任公司 Low-cycle life control method of engine
CN105677991A (en) * 2016-01-11 2016-06-15 中国电子科技集团公司第十研究所 Reliability design optimization method for avionic device
CN106529090A (en) * 2016-12-12 2017-03-22 中国航天标准化研究所 Evaluation method of reliability of aerospace electronic product

Non-Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
刘海年等: ""航空发动机成品可靠性设计与验证方法研究及应用"", 《航空科学技术》 *
姜文龙等: ""高性能卫星用490N轨控发动机研究进展"", 《火箭推进》 *
潘高平: ""基于试验技术的发动机可靠性评估"", 《中国优秀博硕士学位论文全文数据库(硕士)工程科技Ⅱ辑》 *
王桂华等: ""航空发动机可靠性试验方法研究"", 《航空发动机》 *
赵婷等: ""面向高轨卫星的液体轨控发动机研制进展"", 《火箭推进》 *

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN109582692A (en) * 2018-11-15 2019-04-05 北京宇航系统工程研究所 A kind of carrier rocket test data interpretation method and system based on formalized description
CN109839267A (en) * 2019-03-12 2019-06-04 北京宇航系统工程研究所 A kind of valve storage period appraisal procedure
CN112182782A (en) * 2020-11-02 2021-01-05 中国运载火箭技术研究院 Carrier rocket environment adaptability analysis method, system, terminal and medium
CN112182782B (en) * 2020-11-02 2024-05-10 中国运载火箭技术研究院 Carrier rocket environment adaptability analysis method, system, terminal and medium
CN112883497A (en) * 2021-03-22 2021-06-01 中国人民解放军国防科技大学 Aerospace valve reliability assessment method based on multi-source information fusion
CN112883497B (en) * 2021-03-22 2023-06-16 中国人民解放军国防科技大学 Space valve reliability assessment method based on multi-source information fusion

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN108804813B (en) 2022-07-26

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN108804813A (en) A kind of space precise tracking reliability estimation method
EP0957026B1 (en) Power supply unit on board an aircraft
Adler et al. Hydrogen-powered aircraft: Fundamental concepts, key technologies, and environmental impacts
DE60306613T2 (en) Electrical power supplies for an aircraft
CN113446130A (en) Final-stage passivation method for liquid oxygen kerosene of carrier rocket
DE102019110249A1 (en) Hydrogen engine with water injection
CN110406699B (en) Propelling and power generating integrated device for space power system and operation method thereof
US20210080173A1 (en) Liquefaction apparatus, methods, and systems
DE102016222935B4 (en) Fuel cell device, motor vehicle with a fuel cell device and method for operating a fuel cell device
Mangold et al. Aircraft Design Implications of Alternative Fuels for Future Hybrid-Electric Regional Aircraft Configurations
CN116499690A (en) Fuel system anti-gas clamping device for large combustion wind tunnel and use method
Preclik et al. LOX/hydrocarbon propellant trade considerations for future reusable liquid booster engines
DE102010034271A1 (en) Method for operating fuel cell e.g. solid-oxide fuel cell of auxiliary power unit for e.g. lorry, involves using urea or aqueous urea solution as fuel on anode side of fuel cell, where solution is conducted to anode side of cell over pump
EP3643886A2 (en) Device and method for driving a vehicle, aircraft, ship or the like
KR200474436Y1 (en) Fuel Supply System in Field for ME-GI Engine
US5771741A (en) Method for testing gas driven torpedoes using a steam delivery system
Nistor et al. The island hydrogen project: electrolytic generated hydrogen for automotive and maritime applications
EP3617347A1 (en) Energy storage system
CN205206992U (en) Gas generator casing
CN216767597U (en) Novel alcohol-hydrogen internal combustion engine combustion system
DE20209413U1 (en) LPG tank
DE10033736A1 (en) Miniature gas turbine for generator drive in hybrid drive vehicle has secondary energy converter for recovery of exhaust gas thermal energy
Kapitonov Methodology for Assessing the Reliability of an Electric Generator Set With a Gasoline Engine, Kompetentnost’/Competency (Russia), 2022, no. 2
Schneider " It is critical to find alternative low-or no-emission solutions
Frank et al. 60 Years DLR Lampoldshausen-The European Research and Test Site for Chemical Space Propulsion

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant