CN108762074B - Ship control method for improving safety guarantee capability of ship under severe sea conditions - Google Patents

Ship control method for improving safety guarantee capability of ship under severe sea conditions Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN108762074B
CN108762074B CN201810503811.1A CN201810503811A CN108762074B CN 108762074 B CN108762074 B CN 108762074B CN 201810503811 A CN201810503811 A CN 201810503811A CN 108762074 B CN108762074 B CN 108762074B
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
ship
control
algorithm
scheme
executing
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
CN201810503811.1A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN108762074A (en
Inventor
张显库
张国庆
韩旭
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Dalian Maritime University
Original Assignee
Dalian Maritime University
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Dalian Maritime University filed Critical Dalian Maritime University
Priority to CN201810503811.1A priority Critical patent/CN108762074B/en
Publication of CN108762074A publication Critical patent/CN108762074A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN108762074B publication Critical patent/CN108762074B/en
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G05CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05BCONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B13/00Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion
    • G05B13/02Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric
    • G05B13/04Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric involving the use of models or simulators
    • G05B13/042Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric involving the use of models or simulators in which a parameter or coefficient is automatically adjusted to optimise the performance

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Software Systems (AREA)
  • Artificial Intelligence (AREA)
  • Computer Vision & Pattern Recognition (AREA)
  • Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
  • Medical Informatics (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
  • Feedback Control In General (AREA)
  • Control Of Position, Course, Altitude, Or Attitude Of Moving Bodies (AREA)
  • Traffic Control Systems (AREA)

Abstract

The invention discloses a ship control method for improving safety guarantee capability of a ship facing severe sea conditions, which divides a control strategy into two situations facing severe sea conditions and non-severe sea conditions, wherein when the ship faces severe sea conditions, stability is ensured as a main purpose, a second-order closed-loop gain forming algorithm is adopted to realize stable control of the ship with unstable course, good stability of the ship under heavy wind and waves is ensured, when the ship faces non-severe sea conditions, comprehensive performance is ensured as a main purpose, the second-order closed-loop gain forming algorithm is improved, a nonlinear feedback technology, an integral term and a proportional constant term are added to form an advanced control algorithm, and comprehensive navigation performance is ensured. The two strategies are matched with each other, so that the sailing efficiency of the ship can be guaranteed, and the sailing safety can be guaranteed under special conditions.

Description

Ship control method for improving safety guarantee capability of ship under severe sea conditions
Technical Field
The invention relates to the field of ship control engineering and automatic ship navigation, in particular to a ship control method for improving safety guarantee capability of ships under severe sea conditions.
Background
Cargo transported by sea is generally characterized by high value due to large loading capacity. While marine navigation is different from land transportation, the complexity of the environment presents a number of risks. Due to the characteristics of large influence, uncertainty and strong pulsation of the wind waves, great hidden danger is brought to transportation safety. Therefore, the controller design of the intelligent ship must consider how to ensure the stability of the control when the sea state becomes severe.
The traditional ship motion control aims at improving the comprehensive performance of navigation, namely improving six characteristics of stability, accuracy, rapidness, energy conservation, economy and simplicity of control rate, and the six characteristics can give attention when the control rate is designed, so that the ship motion control has a good effect when in normal navigation, but has low robustness under extreme conditions and still needs to be controlled by a driver according to own experience. Therefore, ship motion control under severe sea conditions is a key technical problem to be solved in the development process of intelligent ships, and a mainstream control strategy represented by a closed-loop gain modeling algorithm (CGSA) has not been particularly researched from the perspective of a ship transportation safety guarantee technology. At the same time, there are the following two disadvantages
1) The closed-loop gain forming algorithm is suitable for the characteristic of a stable input and output process. When the ship maneuverability index T0 is negative (i.e., unstable course), the stability of the control is relatively weak, and thus it is not suitable for particularly severe sea conditions.
2) The control algorithm only has one control strategy, has comprehensive performance of heavy navigation and is insufficient for stability under heavy waves.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention aims to overcome the defects in the prior art and provides a control system design method for improving the safety guarantee capability of ships under severe sea conditions. Firstly, a second-order closed-loop gain forming algorithm is provided by using a mirror image mapping technology, stable control of a ship with an unstable course is achieved, and good stability of the ship under heavy storms is guaranteed. And then improving a second-order closed-loop gain forming algorithm, and adding a nonlinear feedback technology, an integral term and a proportional constant term to improve the comprehensive performance of the control algorithm to be used as a control strategy in a normal state. The two strategies are mutually matched, so that the comprehensive navigation performance can be guaranteed, and the stability can be kept under the condition of heavy waves.
In order to achieve the purpose, the technical scheme of the invention is as follows:
a ship control method for improving safety guarantee capability of ships under severe sea conditions is characterized by comprising the following steps:
s1: at time t0, judging the control system switching state, if it is the automatic switching mode, going to step S2, if it is not the automatic switching mode, going to step S3;
s2: reading current wind power information, judging whether the current wind power is less than a set wind speed, if so, entering a step S5, executing an advanced control algorithm control scheme, and if so, entering a step S4, executing a second-order closed-loop gain forming algorithm control scheme;
s3: reading the code of the execution scheme, if the code of the scheme is 1, entering step S5, executing the control scheme of the advanced control algorithm, if the code of the scheme is not 1, entering step S4, executing the control scheme of the second-order closed-loop gain forming algorithm;
s4: executing a second-order closed-loop gain shaping algorithm control scheme with the control law of
Figure GDA0002755888790000021
Wherein, K0,T0Is the maneuverability index, T, of the vessel1The time constant of the closed-loop system is psi, the heading angle of the ship is psi, the rudder angle is psi, and s is a Laplace operator;
s5: executing an advanced control algorithm control scheme having a control law of
Figure GDA0002755888790000022
Wherein, K0,T0Is the maneuverability index, T, of the vessel1Time of closed loop systemNumber, rho>1 is a constant for accelerating system response, less than 0.01 is a very small constant for eliminating system static error, omega is less than 1 is a gain coefficient for adjusting nonlinear feedback for saving energy of the system, psi is a ship heading angle and is a rudder angle, and s is a Laplace operator;
s6: and judging whether the reading time is reached, if so, returning to the step S1, otherwise, waiting and continuously executing the current control law.
Further, the set wind speed described in step S2 is 25 m/S.
According to the technical scheme, the guidance strategy is divided into two situations of severe sea condition facing and non-severe sea condition facing, wherein the stability is ensured as the main purpose when the guidance strategy faces severe sea condition, and the stability control of the ship with unstable course is realized by adopting a second-order closed-loop gain forming algorithm, so that the ship has good stability under heavy wind and waves. When the navigation system is oriented to non-severe sea conditions, the comprehensive performance is mainly guaranteed, a second-order closed-loop gain forming algorithm is improved, a nonlinear feedback technology, an integral term and a proportional constant term are added to form an advanced control algorithm, and the navigation comprehensive performance is guaranteed. The two strategies are mutually matched, the comprehensive navigation performance can be guaranteed, the stability can be kept under the condition of heavy wind and waves, the robust control of the ship motion under severe sea conditions and the fast, energy-saving and economical control strategy of the ship motion under the non-severe sea conditions are achieved, and the method has remarkable advantages.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a flow chart of a vessel control method of the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of a puzzle sign in an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 3 is a prior art simulation result for a nominal model under windless and no-wave conditions;
FIGS. 4 to 9 are simulation results of the second-order closed-loop gain shaping algorithm of the present invention for rudder angle and ship direction angle of a ship under sea conditions of 6-grade wind, 12-grade wind and 15-grade wind, respectively;
FIGS. 10 to 15 are simulation results of the advanced control algorithm of the present invention for a ship under sea conditions of 6-grade wind, 12-grade wind and 15-grade wind;
FIG. 16 is a comparison graph of simulation results of the second-order closed-loop gain shaping algorithm and the advanced control algorithm of the present invention on the sea state of the ship at 15 th wind.
Detailed Description
The following describes embodiments of the present invention in further detail with reference to the accompanying drawings.
In the following detailed description of the embodiments of the present invention, in order to clearly illustrate the structure of the present invention and to facilitate explanation, the structure shown in the drawings is not drawn to a general scale and is partially enlarged, deformed and simplified, so that the present invention should not be construed as limited thereto.
Considering the plane motion of the ship, the Abkowitz research scheme is adopted, only a first order of small quantity is reserved when the fluid dynamic forces X, Y and N are expanded into Taylor series, and considering the bilateral symmetry of the ship, the related derivatives such as
Figure GDA0002755888790000031
Figure GDA0002755888790000032
Xv,Xr,X,
Figure GDA0002755888790000033
Yu,
Figure GDA0002755888790000034
NuWhen the value is zero, the mathematical model of the three-degree-of-freedom ship plane motion can be obtained as
Figure GDA0002755888790000035
Superposing a nonlinear force (moment) formula identified by Norrbin and wind wave interference, adopting a one-skimming system to carry out dimensionless operation, and assisting by
Figure GDA0002755888790000041
And a first-order inertia system mathematical model of the steering engine, and then the speed v and the rotation of the sideslip are consideredThe non-linear Norrbin mathematical model of the bow angular velocity r is presented as
Figure GDA0002755888790000042
Wherein: i'(4),P′(4),Q′(4)Respectively an inertia force derivative matrix, a viscous force derivative matrix and a rudder force derivative matrix, and the numerical calculation of the two matrixes relates to 10 hydrodynamic derivatives
Figure GDA0002755888790000043
Yv,
Figure GDA0002755888790000044
Nv,
Figure GDA0002755888790000045
Yr,
Figure GDA0002755888790000046
Nr,Y,NThe solution of (2) is generally calculated by using a regression formula.
Figure GDA0002755888790000047
Is a state variable, U ═rIs a control input, namely a helm, psi is the ship fore direction and is a helm angle; f'WIND=[YWIND/(0.5ρL3)NWIND/(0.5ρL4)]T,F′WAVE=[YWAVE/(0.5ρL3)NWAVE/(0.5ρL4)]TThe concrete expression is detailed in the literature [2];F′NONIs given by formula (3).
Figure GDA0002755888790000048
Figure GDA0002755888790000049
Figure GDA00027558887900000410
Wherein C is a dimensionless cross flow coefficient, and is 0.3-0.8; l is the length of the ship and d is the draught of the ship.
Obtaining formula (6) by linearizing formula (1)
Figure GDA00027558887900000411
For vessel heading maintenance, the system model focuses on the dynamics of the response of the heading angle ψ to the rudder angle. To this end, are combined
Figure GDA00027558887900000412
The state space model shown in the formula (9) is converted into a transfer function form, and the transfer function form is arranged to obtain the formula (7).
Figure GDA00027558887900000413
In the following description of the present invention, please refer to fig. 1, in which fig. 1 is a flowchart of a control system design method for improving safety guarantee capability of a ship under severe sea conditions according to the present invention. As shown in fig. 1, the method for designing a control system for improving the safety guarantee capability of a ship under severe sea conditions of the present invention is characterized by comprising the following steps:
s1: at time t0, judging the control system switching state, if it is the automatic switching mode, going to step S2, if it is not the automatic switching mode, going to step S3;
the switching state of the control system can be an automatic switching state or a manual switching state, the system automatically judges the selection of the control law according to the wind power information in the automatic switching state, and an operator selects the control law according to the requirements and experience in the manual switching state.
S2: reading current wind power information, judging whether the current wind power is less than a set wind speed, if so, entering a step S5, executing an advanced control algorithm control scheme, and if so, entering a step S4, executing a second-order closed-loop gain forming algorithm control scheme;
and under the automatic switching state, the system automatically judges the selection of the control law according to the wind power information. In the embodiment, 25m/s is used as the set wind speed, and the corresponding wind level is 10-level wind.
S3: reading the code of the execution scheme, if the code of the scheme is 1, entering step S5, executing the control scheme of the advanced control algorithm, if the code of the scheme is not 1, entering step S4, executing the control scheme of the second-order closed-loop gain forming algorithm;
and in the manual switching state, an operator selects a control law according to requirements and experience. The scheme is numbered 1, namely, the operator considers the control scheme to be the main purpose of ensuring the comprehensive performance, namely, the control scheme of the advanced control algorithm is executed. If the code number of the scheme is not 1, the operator considers that the control scheme is mainly used for ensuring the stability, namely the control scheme of the second-order closed-loop gain forming algorithm
S4: executing a second-order closed-loop gain shaping algorithm control scheme with the control law of
Figure GDA0002755888790000051
Wherein, K0,T0Is the maneuverability index, T, of the vessel1For the time constant of the closed loop system, ψ is the ship heading angle, is the rudder angle, and s is the laplacian operator.
The singular value curve of the complementary sensitivity function T (which is also the transfer function of the system from input to output) is approximately represented as the spectral curve of a second-order inertial system with a maximum singular value of 1, which is equivalent to using a second-order closed-loop gain shaping algorithm. Compared with a typical oscillation link, the damping coefficient is equal to 1, so that the T frequency spectrum is ensured to have no peak value, and the stable robust controller is
Figure GDA0002755888790000052
S5: executing an advanced control algorithm control scheme having a control law of
Figure GDA0002755888790000061
Wherein, K0,T0Is the maneuverability index, T, of the vessel1Is the time constant of a closed loop system, p>1 is a constant for accelerating system response, less than 0.01 is a very small constant for eliminating system static error, omega is less than 1 is a gain coefficient for adjusting nonlinear feedback for saving energy of the system, psi is a ship heading angle and is a rudder angle, and s is a Laplace operator;
if it is desired to remove the static error, reference 1 can be used]A simple robust control algorithm of the medium plus integral; to further emphasize its rapidity, document [1] can be adopted]The proportional plus constant processing technology can greatly improve the response speed of a large inertia system; to further improve the energy saving effect, document [3] can be adopted]And document [4 ]]The nonlinear feedback technology added with the sine function forms an advanced ship motion control algorithm after the 3 technology improvements[4],[5]The control law after the above 3 improvements is
Figure GDA0002755888790000062
S6: and judging whether the reading time is reached, if so, returning to the step S1, otherwise, waiting and continuously executing the current control law.
In order to verify the effectiveness of the guidance algorithm provided by the invention, the part takes a large intelligent number (as shown in fig. 2) as a controlled object, and a computer simulation experiment is carried out by utilizing matlab. The intellect number is the first intelligent bulk cargo ship in the world independently developed by the middle ship group, and is also the first intelligent ship passing the certification of the classification society in the world, and is officially delivered and put into use in 12 months and 5 days in 2017. Table 1 gives the parameters of the wisdom-size ship.
TABLE 1 full-load ship type parameter of Dazhi size
Figure GDA0002755888790000063
Through calculation, the ship maneuverability indexes of the wisdom number are respectively as follows: k0=0.18,T0-203.73 because of T0Is a negative number, so the ship is an unstable ship with unstable course, and the control is relatively difficult.
In order to compare the control effects of the existing control method and the two strategies proposed by the invention under different sea conditions, the following sets of experiments were carried out using MATLAB software.
The first group uses the control law (7), prior art, to simulate a nominal model without wind and wave disturbances and model perturbations. The simulation results are shown in fig. 3. The rise time of the system is 10s, the overshoot is 4%, the static error is avoided, and the control performance is good.
The second group adopts a control law (8), namely a second-order closed-loop gain forming algorithm, and simulates the control effect of the ship under the sea conditions of 6-level wind, 12-level wind and 15-level wind under the condition that the wind directions are all 90 degrees. The simulation results are shown in FIGS. 4 to 9, respectively.
And the third group adopts a control law (9), namely an advanced control algorithm, and simulates the control effect of the ship under the sea conditions of 6-grade wind, 12-grade wind and 15-grade wind under the condition that the wind directions are all 90 degrees. The simulation results are shown in FIGS. 10 to 15.
As shown in FIGS. 4-5 and 10-11, in the 6 th wind, the second-order closed-loop gain shaping algorithm has an adjustment time of 600s and a 1.6% static difference. The average rudder angle of the advanced control algorithm is reduced to 3.34 degrees, energy is saved by 12 percent, the static error is successfully eliminated, the adjusting time is reduced from 600s to 300s, the response speed is accelerated, and slightly worse, the overshoot is 8 percent, which is a side effect brought by the acceleration of the response speed of the system. Overall, fig. 7 is more accurate, faster, and more energy efficient than fig. 4.
As shown in FIGS. 6-7 and 12-13, in 12-grade wind, the second-order closed-loop gain shaping algorithm has a static difference of 8.0% and an average rudder angle of 5.15 degrees. The advanced control algorithm reaches a set value in 220s, although 8.0% of static difference exists in 1000s, the static difference can be eliminated finally, the average rudder angle is 4.43 degrees, and the energy is saved by 16.2% compared with that in the prior art shown in figure 5. Overall, the effect of fig. 8 is more accurate, faster, and more energy efficient than that of fig. 5.
As shown in FIGS. 8-9 and 14-15, in 15-grade wind, the second-order closed-loop gain shaping algorithm has 18.0% of static difference and an average rudder angle of 10.0 degrees. The control performance of the advanced control algorithm is poor, the rising time is slow, the average rudder angle of the first 1000s is 11.59 degrees, compared with the average rudder angle of the first 1000s, the energy is more consumed, and the accurate, quick and energy-saving effect of the improved algorithm in front of 12-level wind is not achieved. If the simulation time is increased from 1000s to 1500s, the comparison graph of the simulation results of the two algorithms is shown in fig. 16, and the second-order closed-loop gain forming algorithm has better stability from the perspective of ship navigation safety guarantee.
Therefore, within 12-grade wind, the advanced control algorithm of the formula (9) has a better control effect, and the algorithm is more suitable for being used when the intelligent ship is normally sailed; when the intelligent ship sails in a worse sea condition and the safety is threatened, the control algorithm of the formula (8) is switched to, and the guarantee is ensured.
Through the simulation experiment and comparison with the existing research, the beneficial effects brought by the invention are summarized as the following 2 points:
1) the invention provides two control strategies which can be used in a matched mode, and ship navigation control under different sea conditions can be achieved. And when the sea condition is good, the comprehensive performance is preferably considered, an algorithm with improved comprehensive performance is used, the stability of control is concerned under the condition of severe sea condition, and a second-order closed-loop gain forming algorithm is used. The advantages of the two algorithms complement each other, so that the navigation efficiency of the intelligent ship can be guaranteed, the navigation safety can be guaranteed under special conditions, and the method has important significance for the research and development of the intelligent ship.
2) The harsh environment at sea prompts people to preferentially adopt mature and reliable technologies and products, and the control algorithm which is simple, reliable and obvious in physical significance is easier to pursue in the market. The two control algorithms proposed by the invention are both in a closed-loop gain forming algorithm, so that the characteristics of simplicity and easiness in use are inherited. The physical concept of the theory is clear, the solving process is extremely simple, the adjusting parameters are few, and the method has physical significance and is very convenient for application in engineering practice.
Reference is made to
[1] Zhang obviously storehouse, ship motion simple and direct robust control [ M ]. Beijing scientific Press, 2012.
[2] Zhang shou, jin Yi, control system modeling and digital simulation (2 nd edition) [ M ], Dalian, university of maritime publishers, 2013.
[3] The autopilot control algorithm [ J ] driven by a sine function of course deviation, Chinese navigation, 2011,34(1):1-4.
[4]Zhang Xianku,Zhang Guoqing.Design of ship course-keeping autopilot using a sine function based nonlinear feedback technique[J].Journal of navigation,2016,69(2):246-256.
[5]Zhang Xianku,Yang Guangping,Zhang Qiang,Zhang Guoqing*,Zhang Yuqi.Improved concise backstepping control of course-keeping for ships using nonlinear feedback technique[J].Journal of Navigation,2017,70(6):1401-1414.
[6]Guoqing Zhang,Xianku Zhang*,Wei Guan.Stability analysis and design of integrating unstable delay processes using the mirror-mapping technique[J].J.of Process Control,2014,24(7):1038-1045.
[7] Guogyu, nautics [ M ]. Dalian: university of maritime publisher, 1999.
The above description is only for the preferred embodiment of the present invention, but the scope of the present invention is not limited thereto, and any person skilled in the art should be considered to be within the technical scope of the present invention, and the technical solutions and the inventive concepts thereof according to the present invention should be equivalent or changed within the scope of the present invention.

Claims (2)

1. A ship control method for improving safety guarantee capability of ships under severe sea conditions is characterized by comprising the following steps:
s1: at time t0, judging the control system switching state, if it is the automatic switching mode, going to step S2, if it is not the automatic switching mode, going to step S3;
s2: reading current wind power information, judging whether the current wind power is less than a set wind speed, if so, entering a step S5, executing an advanced control algorithm control scheme, and if so, entering a step S4, executing a second-order closed-loop gain forming algorithm control scheme;
s3: reading the code of the execution scheme, if the code of the scheme is 1, entering step S5, executing the control scheme of the advanced control algorithm, if the code of the scheme is not 1, entering step S4, executing the control scheme of the second-order closed-loop gain forming algorithm;
s4: executing a second-order closed-loop gain shaping algorithm control scheme with the control law of
Figure FDA0002755888780000011
The transfer function model of the controlled object is as follows:
Figure FDA0002755888780000012
wherein, K0,T0Is the maneuverability index, T, of the vessel1The time constant of the closed-loop system is psi, the heading angle of the ship is psi, the rudder angle is psi, and s is a Laplace operator;
s5: executing an advanced control algorithm control scheme having a control law of
Figure FDA0002755888780000013
Wherein, K0,T0Is the maneuverability index, T, of the vessel1Is the time constant of a closed loop system, p>1 is a constant for accelerating system response, less than 0.01 is a very small constant for eliminating system static error, omega is less than 1 is a gain coefficient for adjusting nonlinear feedback for saving energy of the system, psi is a ship heading angle and is a rudder angle, and s is a Laplace operator;
s6: and judging whether the reading time is reached, if so, returning to the step S1, otherwise, waiting and continuously executing the current control law.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the set wind speed in step S2 is 25 m/S.
CN201810503811.1A 2018-05-23 2018-05-23 Ship control method for improving safety guarantee capability of ship under severe sea conditions Expired - Fee Related CN108762074B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201810503811.1A CN108762074B (en) 2018-05-23 2018-05-23 Ship control method for improving safety guarantee capability of ship under severe sea conditions

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201810503811.1A CN108762074B (en) 2018-05-23 2018-05-23 Ship control method for improving safety guarantee capability of ship under severe sea conditions

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN108762074A CN108762074A (en) 2018-11-06
CN108762074B true CN108762074B (en) 2020-12-29

Family

ID=64005320

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201810503811.1A Expired - Fee Related CN108762074B (en) 2018-05-23 2018-05-23 Ship control method for improving safety guarantee capability of ship under severe sea conditions

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN108762074B (en)

Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN101615000A (en) * 2009-06-19 2009-12-30 大连海事大学 Robust adaptive autopilot control algorithm for navigation simulator
CN102951272A (en) * 2012-10-30 2013-03-06 哈尔滨工程大学 Comprehensive re-setting control method for ship rudder stabilization
CN104181815A (en) * 2014-08-19 2014-12-03 哈尔滨工程大学 Ship movement compensation control method based on environmental estimation
CN104483845A (en) * 2014-11-21 2015-04-01 大连海事大学 Ship autopilot algorithm testing simulation system
US9720412B1 (en) * 2012-09-27 2017-08-01 Waymo Llc Modifying the behavior of an autonomous vehicle using context based parameter switching
CN107168335A (en) * 2017-06-28 2017-09-15 大连海事大学 A kind of unmanned surface vehicle path trace method of guidance for considering mixing multiple target avoidance
CN107229223A (en) * 2017-06-07 2017-10-03 哈尔滨工程大学 A kind of intelligent switching system of many drive patterns of ocean energy unmanned boat

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN103632582A (en) * 2013-11-14 2014-03-12 哈尔滨工程大学 Interactive DP operation-simulating training simulation platform
US11651258B2 (en) * 2014-01-08 2023-05-16 Yechezkal Evan Spero Integrated docking system for intelligent devices
CN104533714B (en) * 2014-11-03 2017-03-01 华北电力大学 A kind of wind turbine generator system controller parameter identification and setting method

Patent Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN101615000A (en) * 2009-06-19 2009-12-30 大连海事大学 Robust adaptive autopilot control algorithm for navigation simulator
US9720412B1 (en) * 2012-09-27 2017-08-01 Waymo Llc Modifying the behavior of an autonomous vehicle using context based parameter switching
CN102951272A (en) * 2012-10-30 2013-03-06 哈尔滨工程大学 Comprehensive re-setting control method for ship rudder stabilization
CN104181815A (en) * 2014-08-19 2014-12-03 哈尔滨工程大学 Ship movement compensation control method based on environmental estimation
CN104483845A (en) * 2014-11-21 2015-04-01 大连海事大学 Ship autopilot algorithm testing simulation system
CN107229223A (en) * 2017-06-07 2017-10-03 哈尔滨工程大学 A kind of intelligent switching system of many drive patterns of ocean energy unmanned boat
CN107168335A (en) * 2017-06-28 2017-09-15 大连海事大学 A kind of unmanned surface vehicle path trace method of guidance for considering mixing multiple target avoidance

Non-Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Design of Ship Course-Keeping Autopilot using a Sine Function-Based Nonlinear Feedback Technique;zhang xianku等;《Journal of Navigation》;20161231;第69卷(第2期);第246-256页 *
Linear reduction of backstepping algorithm based on nonlinear decoration for ship course-keeping control system;Zhang Xianku等;《Ocean Engineering》;20180101;第147卷;第1-8页 *
PawełDworak.A reduction of a controller set of switched controller for positioning of a drillship on a sea surface.《2012 17th International Conference on Methods &Models in Automation & Robotics (MMAR)》.2012,第325-330页. *
无人船艇的发展及展望;张树凯,等;《世界海运》;20150915(第9期);第29-36页 *
海况变化时的船舶定点定位切换自适应控制研究;谢业海;《万方数据http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/thesis/D430774》;20140417;第1-151页 *
超恶劣海况下船舶运动简捷鲁棒自适应控制;张国庆;《中国博士学位论文全文数据库》;20161215(第12(2016)期);第C036-1页 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN108762074A (en) 2018-11-06

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Zhang et al. Robust adaptive neural control for wing-sail-assisted vehicle via the multiport event-triggered approach
CN108563130B (en) Method, equipment and medium for controlling automatic berthing of under-actuated ship adaptive neural network
Zhang et al. Improved concise backstepping control of course keeping for ships using nonlinear feedback technique
CN101859147A (en) Ship course intelligent coordination control method
CN103558854B (en) A kind of sail-assisted propulsion boats and ships course heading control method and system
Yan et al. Course-keeping control for ships with nonlinear feedback and zero-order holder component
Haseltalab et al. Adaptive control for autonomous ships with uncertain model and unknown propeller dynamics
CN104590526A (en) Method and device for controlling energy-saving sailing of ship
Zhang et al. Nonlinear improved concise backstepping control of course keeping for ships
CN109656143A (en) A kind of sea drives the adaptive tracking control method and system of ship entirely
CN103895831B (en) A kind of boats and ships fin/wing fin rollstabilization anti-saturation controls device and control method thereof
Wan et al. Heading multi-mode control based on soft-switching for autonomous underwater vehicle
Shen et al. Online speed optimization with feedforward of unmanned sailboat via extremum seeking without steady-state oscillation
Li et al. Event-triggered robust adaptive control for path following of the URS in presence of the marine practice
CN108762074B (en) Ship control method for improving safety guarantee capability of ship under severe sea conditions
CN104595040A (en) Method and device for controlling energy-saving sailing of ship
CN106585915B (en) Ship rollstabilization system double loop control based on fin Yu wing fin vector controlled
Jia et al. Auv tunnel tracking method based on adaptive model predictive control
Yu et al. Ship RBF neural network sliding mode PID heading control
Li et al. Research on heading control of USV with the lateral thruster
Ding et al. Trajectory-tracking controller design of underactuated surface vessels
CN104590529A (en) Method and device for controlling energy-saving sailing of ship
Wu et al. Intelligent control adopted CMAC for twin-rudder twin-propeller ship course tracking
Xianghui et al. Ship Steering Design Based on NOMOTO Equation
Sun et al. Design of simplified fuzzy controller for ship fin stabilizer

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant
CF01 Termination of patent right due to non-payment of annual fee
CF01 Termination of patent right due to non-payment of annual fee

Granted publication date: 20201229

Termination date: 20210523