CN108694178A - A kind of method and device for recommending judicial cognizance - Google Patents
A kind of method and device for recommending judicial cognizance Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN108694178A CN108694178A CN201710221357.6A CN201710221357A CN108694178A CN 108694178 A CN108694178 A CN 108694178A CN 201710221357 A CN201710221357 A CN 201710221357A CN 108694178 A CN108694178 A CN 108694178A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- case
- cognizance
- judge
- rule
- collection
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
- Databases & Information Systems (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
- Financial Or Insurance-Related Operations Such As Payment And Settlement (AREA)
Abstract
An embodiment of the present invention provides the method and devices for recommending judicial cognizance,Preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates includes standard central issue,The applicable reference judge's rule of standard central issue,With reference to the applicable laws and regulations provision of judge's rule,First semantic relation,And second semantic relation,Utilize the technological means of semantic analysis and semantic matches,The first standard central issue with the semantic matches of the goal-trail number of packages evidence is found from preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates,Further according to the first semantic relation and the second semantic relation,The first standard central issue is applicable in first is obtained with reference to judge's rule,And first with reference to the first applicable laws and regulations provision of judge's rule,There is high-caliber judicial professional knowledge without using person,Only need the goal-trail number of packages evidence of input target case,Intelligent recommendation and the relevant judicial cognizance of target case can be realized,General applicability is high.
Description
Technical field
The present invention relates to judicial cognizance technical fields, more particularly to a kind of method and device for recommending judicial cognizance.
Background technology
The party of judge, lawyer and case need to obtain and the target case phase when handling a target case
As have case judicial cognizance as reference, the judicial cognizance include case facts description, central issue description, it is applicable
Case judge's rule, applicable laws and regulations provision and case judgement document etc..
The method for obtaining the judicial cognizance of existing case similar with the target case, generally by handling the target case
Judge, lawyer or party etc. utilize known legal knowledge, are deeply divided the case information of the target case
Analysis summarizes the case facts and case central issue of the target case, and uses law keyword, is examined from Legal Knowledge Base
Rope obtains the judicial cognizance of existing case similar with the target case.
The method of above-mentioned retrieval judicial cognizance, it is desirable that user (judge, lawyer or party etc.) is familiar with the law and knows
Know the organizational form in library, legal knowledge can be utilized accurately to summarize the case facts and case central issue of the target case,
And retrieved using accurate law keyword, this is too high to the judicial level of expertise requirement of user, leads to the party
Method general applicability is poor.
Invention content
Present invention solves the technical problem that being to provide a kind of method and device for recommending judicial cognizance, describes the administration of justice and know
Semantic relation between knowledge realizes the technical solution of intelligent recommendation judicial cognizance.
For this purpose, the technical solution that the present invention solves technical problem is:
A method of recommending judicial cognizance, the method includes:
The goal-trail number of packages evidence for obtaining target case, to the goal-trail number of packages according to progress semantic analysis;
The standard central issue with the semantic matches of the goal-trail number of packages evidence is searched from preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
As the first standard central issue, the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates includes standard central issue, the standard central issue
Applicable reference judge's rule, the laws and regulations provision applicable with reference to judge's rule, the first semantic relation and the second language
Adopted relationship, first semantic relation include the semantic relation between the standard central issue and the rule with reference to judge,
Second semantic relation includes the semantic relation with reference between judge's rule and the laws and regulations provision;
Using first semantic relation, it is burnt that the first standard dispute is obtained from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
The applicable reference judge's rule of point is used as first with reference to judge's rule, using second semantic relation, from the preset department
Described first is obtained in method knowledge mapping with reference to the applicable laws and regulations provision of judge's rule as the first laws and regulations provision.
In one example, the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates further includes the case central issue for having case, described
Standard central issue belonging to case central issue and third semantic relation, the third semantic relation include the case
Semantic relation between central issue and the standard central issue, the method further include:
Obtain the second standard central issue chosen from the first standard central issue;
Using the third semantic relation, it is burnt that the second standard dispute is obtained from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
The first included case central issue of point.
In one example, the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates further includes the existing case data of the existing case,
The method further includes:
Obtain the second case central issue selected from the first case central issue;
The first existing case belonging to the second case central issue is determined from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
Set;
Obtain the second existing case set chosen from the described first existing case set;
The existing case data of the described second existing case set are obtained from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates.
In one example, the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates further includes the case central issue of the existing case,
The applicable case judge rule of the case central issue and the 4th semantic relation, the 4th semantic relation include described
Semantic relation between case central issue and case judge's rule, the method further include:
Using the 4th semantic relation, it is burnt that the first case dispute is obtained from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
Applicable the first case judge's rule of point.
In one example, the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates further includes the existing case data of the existing case,
The method further includes:
It obtains the second case selected from first case judge's rule and judges rule;
Determine that the third belonging to the second case judge rule has case from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
Set;
It obtains from the third and has the 4th existing case set chosen in case set;
The existing case data of the described 4th existing case set are obtained from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates.
In one example, the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates further includes case judge's rule of the existing case,
Reference judge rule belonging to the case judge rule and the 5th semantic relation, the 5th semantic relation include described
Semantic relation between case judge rule and the rule with reference to judge, the method further include:
Using the 5th semantic relation, the first case judge rule are obtained from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
First belonging to then is regular with reference to judge.
In one example, the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates further includes the existing case data for having case, described
Have a case facts description of case, the standard fact description belonging to case facts description, the 6th semantic relation, described the
Six semantic relations include the semantic relation between the case facts description and standard fact description, and the method is also wrapped
It includes:
It searches from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates and has with the first of the semantic matches of the goal-trail number of packages evidence
Case collective data;
Determine that the belonging to the first existing case collective data the 5th has from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
Case set;
The first case facts description of the described 5th existing case set is obtained from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates;
Using the 6th semantic relation, from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates obtaining first case facts retouches
First standard fact description belonging to stating.
In one example, the method further includes:
It counts each described first standard fact and describes occurred number;
Most the first standard fact description of the number occurred is obtained to describe as the second standard fact;
Export the second standard fact description.
In one example, the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates further includes the standard fact description and standard fact mould
The correspondence of plate, the method further include:
Obtain selected third standard fact description from the first standard fact description;
The third standard fact, which is obtained, from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates describes corresponding standard fact template
As target criteria fact template;
The case central issue conduct of the described 5th existing case set is obtained from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
Third case central issue;
Obtain the 4th case central issue chosen from the third case central issue;
Using the third semantic relation, it is burnt that the 4th case dispute is obtained from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
Standard central issue belonging to point is as third standard central issue;
The regular conduct of case judge of the described 5th existing case set is obtained from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
Second case judge's rule;
It obtains the third case selected from second case judge's rule and judges rule;
Using the 5th semantic relation, the third case judge rule are obtained from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
Reference judge rule belonging to then is as second with reference to judge's rule;
Using second semantic relation, described second is obtained from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates with reference to judge's rule
Then applicable laws and regulations provision is as the second laws and regulations provision;
Using the target criteria fact template, the third standard central issue, the 4th case central issue, institute
Third case judge's rule is stated, described second generates judgement document with reference to judge's rule and the second laws and regulations provision.
In one example, further include the key of judicial cognizance and the judicial cognizance in the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
The correspondence of word, the judicial cognizance include the standard central issue, described with reference to judge's rule, the laws and regulations item
Text, any one or more in standard fact description and the standard fact template, the method further includes:
Obtain keyword;
According to the keyword the corresponding judicial cognizance of the keyword is searched from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates.
A kind of device for recommending judicial cognizance, described device include:
Semantic analysis unit, the goal-trail number of packages evidence for obtaining target case, to the goal-trail number of packages according to progress language
Justice analysis;
First searching unit, for searching semantic with the goal-trail number of packages evidence from preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
For the standard central issue matched as the first standard central issue, the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates includes standard central issue,
The applicable reference judge's rule of the standard central issue, the laws and regulations provision applicable with reference to judge's rule, the first language
Adopted relationship and the second semantic relation, first semantic relation include that the standard central issue is advised with described with reference to judge
Semantic relation between then, second semantic relation include described with reference between judge's rule and the laws and regulations provision
Semantic relation;
First acquisition unit is obtained for utilizing first semantic relation from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
The applicable reference judge's rule of the first standard central issue is used as first with reference to judge's rule, utilizes the described second semantic pass
System obtains described first with reference to the applicable laws and regulations provision of judge's rule as the from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
One laws and regulations provision.
In one example, the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates further includes the case central issue for having case, described
Standard central issue belonging to case central issue and third semantic relation, the third semantic relation include the case
Semantic relation between central issue and the standard central issue, described device further include:
Second acquisition unit, for obtaining the second standard central issue chosen from the first standard central issue;
Third acquiring unit is obtained for utilizing the third semantic relation from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
The first case central issue that the second standard central issue is included.
In one example, the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates further includes the existing case data of the existing case,
Described device further includes:
4th acquiring unit, for obtaining the second case central issue selected from the first case central issue;
First determination unit, for determining the second case central issue institute from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
The the first existing case set belonged to;
5th acquiring unit, for obtaining the second existing case set chosen from the described first existing case set;
6th acquiring unit, for obtaining the described second existing case set from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
Have case data.
In one example, the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates further includes the case central issue of the existing case,
The applicable case judge rule of the case central issue and the 4th semantic relation, the 4th semantic relation include described
Semantic relation between case central issue and case judge's rule, described device further include:
7th acquiring unit is obtained for utilizing the 4th semantic relation from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
Applicable the first case judge's rule of the first case central issue.
In one example, the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates further includes the existing case data of the existing case,
Described device further includes:
8th acquiring unit judges rule for obtaining the second case selected from first case judge's rule;
Second determination unit, for determining the regular institute of the second case judge from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
The third of category has case set;
9th acquiring unit has the 4th existing case set chosen in case set for obtaining from the third;
Tenth acquiring unit, for obtaining the described 4th existing case set from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
Have case data.
In one example, the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates further includes case judge's rule of the existing case,
Reference judge rule belonging to the case judge rule and the 5th semantic relation, the 5th semantic relation include described
Semantic relation between case judge rule and the rule with reference to judge, described device further include:
11st acquiring unit is obtained for utilizing the 5th semantic relation from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
Take first belonging to the first case judge rule with reference to judge's rule.
In one example, the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates further includes the existing case data for having case, described
Have a case facts description of case, the standard fact description belonging to case facts description, the 6th semantic relation, described the
Six semantic relations include the semantic relation between the case facts description and standard fact description, and described device is also wrapped
It includes:
Second searching unit, for searching the language with the goal-trail number of packages evidence from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
The matched first existing case collective data of justice;
Third determination unit, for determining the first existing case set number from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
According to the 5th affiliated existing case set;
12nd acquiring unit, for obtaining the described 5th existing case set from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
The first case facts description;
13rd acquiring unit is obtained for utilizing the 6th semantic relation from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
Obtain the first standard fact description belonging to the first case facts description.
In one example, described device further includes:
Statistic unit describes occurred number for counting each described first standard fact;
14th acquiring unit, for obtaining most the first standard fact description of the number occurred as the second mark
Accurate true description;
Output unit, for exporting the second standard fact description.
In one example, the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates further includes the standard fact description and standard fact mould
The correspondence of plate, described device further include:
15th acquiring unit, the third standard fact for obtaining selected from the first standard fact description are retouched
It states;
16th acquiring unit, for obtaining the third standard fact description from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
Corresponding standard fact template is as target criteria fact template;
17th acquiring unit, for obtaining the described 5th existing case set from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
Case central issue as third case central issue;
18th acquiring unit, it is burnt for obtaining the 4th case chosen from third case central issue dispute
Point;
19th acquiring unit is obtained for utilizing the third semantic relation from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
Take the standard central issue belonging to the 4th case central issue as third standard central issue;
20th acquiring unit, for obtaining the described 5th existing case set from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
Case judge rule as the second case judge rule;
21st acquiring unit judges rule for obtaining the third case selected from second case judge's rule
Then;
22nd acquiring unit, for utilizing the 5th semantic relation, from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
The reference judge rule belonging to the third case judge rule is obtained as second with reference to judge's rule;
23rd acquiring unit, for utilizing second semantic relation, from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
Described second is obtained with reference to the applicable laws and regulations provision of judge's rule as the second laws and regulations provision;
Generation unit, for utilizing the target criteria fact template, the third standard central issue, the 4th case
Part central issue, the third case judge rule, described second with reference to judge's rule and the second laws and regulations provision
Generate judgement document.
In one example, further include the key of judicial cognizance and the judicial cognizance in the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
The correspondence of word, the judicial cognizance include the standard central issue, described with reference to judge's rule, the laws and regulations item
Text, any one or more in standard fact description and the standard fact template, described device further includes:
24th acquiring unit, for obtaining keyword;
Third searching unit, for searching the key from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates according to the keyword
The corresponding judicial cognizance of word.
A kind of model of judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates, the model include:
First semantic modules, for storing the first semantic relation, first semantic relation includes that the standard dispute is burnt
Semantic relation between point and the rule with reference to judge;
Second semantic modules, for storing the second semantic relation, second semantic relation includes described with reference to judge's rule
The then semantic relation between the laws and regulations provision.
In one example, the model further includes:
Third semantic modules, the 4th semantic modules, the 5th semantic modules, in the 6th semantic modules and formwork module
Any one or more;
Third semantic modules, for storing third semantic relation, the third semantic relation includes that the case dispute is burnt
Semantic relation between point and the standard central issue;
4th semantic modules, for storing the 4th semantic relation, the 4th semantic relation includes that the case dispute is burnt
Semantic relation between point and case judge's rule;
5th semantic modules, for storing the 5th semantic relation, the 5th semantic relation includes the case judge rule
The then semantic relation between the rule with reference to judge;
6th semantic modules, for storing the 6th semantic relation, the 6th semantic relation includes that the case facts are retouched
State the semantic relation between standard fact description
Formwork module further includes the standard fact description and standard thing for storing the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
The correspondence of real template.
According to the above-mentioned technical solution, the method have the advantages that:
An embodiment of the present invention provides the method and devices for recommending judicial cognizance, obtain the goal-trail number of packages of target case
According to, to goal-trail number of packages according to progress semantic analysis, the semanteme of lookup and goal-trail number of packages evidence from preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
Matched standard central issue obtains the applicable reference judge's rule of the first standard central issue as the first standard central issue
As first with reference to judge's rule, described first is obtained with reference to the applicable laws and regulations provision of judge's rule as the first method law
Advise provision.Preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates includes standard central issue, the applicable reference judge's rule of standard central issue, reference
The applicable laws and regulations provision of judge's rule, the first semantic relation and the second semantic relation utilize semantic analysis and semantic
The technological means matched finds the first standard with the semantic matches of the goal-trail number of packages evidence from preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
Central issue obtains the first reference that the first standard central issue is applicable in further according to the first semantic relation and the second semantic relation
Judge's rule and first has the high-caliber administration of justice with reference to the first applicable laws and regulations provision of judge's rule without using person
Professional knowledge, it is only necessary to input the goal-trail number of packages evidence of target case, you can realize intelligent recommendation and the relevant department of target case
Method knowledge, general applicability are high.
Above description is only the general introduction of technical solution of the present invention, in order to better understand the technical means of the present invention,
And can be implemented in accordance with the contents of the specification, and in order to allow above and other objects of the present invention, feature and advantage can
It is clearer and more comprehensible, below the special specific implementation mode for lifting the present invention.
Description of the drawings
In order to more clearly explain the embodiment of the invention or the technical proposal in the existing technology, to embodiment or will show below
There is attached drawing needed in technology description to be briefly described, it should be apparent that, the accompanying drawings in the following description is only this
Some embodiments of invention for those of ordinary skill in the art without creative efforts, can be with
Obtain other attached drawings according to these attached drawings.
Fig. 1 is method one example flow chart provided in an embodiment of the present invention for recommending judicial cognizance;
Fig. 2 is method two example flow chart provided in an embodiment of the present invention for recommending judicial cognizance;
Fig. 3 is method three example flow chart provided in an embodiment of the present invention for recommending judicial cognizance;
Fig. 4 is method four example flow chart provided in an embodiment of the present invention for recommending judicial cognizance;
Fig. 5 is method five example flow chart provided in an embodiment of the present invention for recommending judicial cognizance;
Fig. 6 is method six example flow chart provided in an embodiment of the present invention for recommending judicial cognizance;
Fig. 7 is judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates structural schematic diagram provided in an embodiment of the present invention;
Fig. 8 is the apparatus structure schematic diagram provided in an embodiment of the present invention for recommending judicial cognizance.
Specific implementation mode
The exemplary embodiment of the disclosure is more fully described below with reference to accompanying drawings.Although showing the disclosure in attached drawing
Exemplary embodiment, it being understood, however, that may be realized in various forms the disclosure without should be by embodiments set forth here
It is limited.On the contrary, these embodiments are provided to facilitate a more thoroughly understanding of the present invention, and can be by the scope of the present disclosure
Completely it is communicated to those skilled in the art.
An embodiment of the present invention provides a preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates, which defines judicial cognizance
Between semantic relation.The judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates is based on the existing case data for largely having case, by knowledge graph
Spectral technology expert uses the technological means of intelligent recognition and mark, from a large amount of department having in case data needed for classification extraction
Method knowledge, then professional summary and modification are carried out to the judicial cognizance extracted by judicial expert, to establish judicial cognizance
Between semantic relation.It introduces in detail below.
In one embodiment, judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates includes standard central issue, and the applicable reference of standard central issue is cut out
Sentence rule, with reference to the applicable laws and regulations provision of judge's rule, the first semantic relation and the second semantic relation, first is semantic
Relationship includes standard central issue and the semantic relation with reference to judge between regular, and the second semantic relation includes with reference to judge's rule
With the semantic relation between laws and regulations provision.
Wherein, standard central issue, the applicable reference judge's rule of standard central issue, and be applicable in reference to judge's rule
Laws and regulations provision be judicial cognizance.Standard central issue be judicial department (such as:Law court, procuratorate) assert concurrently
The central issue of cloth.In the case of one kind, which is exactly to be summarized simultaneously according to real case by law court or procuratorate
Assert, the specification expression form as central issue;Can also be to be summarized according to practical case by judge or lawyer, by
What law court or procuratorial work institutes were assert, the specification expression form as central issue.
It is judge's rule that official of judicial department assert and issues with reference to judge's rule.It is similar with standard central issue,
In the case of one kind, is summarized and assert according to real case by law court or procuratorate with reference to judge's rule, advised as judge
Specification expression form then;Can also be by judge either lawyer according to practical case summarize by law court or procuratorial work institutes
Assert, the specification expression form as judge's rule.
Laws and regulations provision is:What the National People's Congress of the People's Republic of China (PRC) and its standing committee were formulated
What law, the legal explanation of the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress, the Supreme People's Court or the Supreme People's Procuratorate made
The deputy to the People's Congress of judicial explanation, the administrative regulation that the State Council of the PRC is formulated, each provinces, autonomous regions and municipalities is big
Local laws and regulations that meeting and its standing committee formulate, regulations on the exercise of autonomy, specific regulation, each provinces, autonomous regions and municipalities and larger
Each portion of the People's Government and State Council in city, the committee, People's Bank of China, the National Audit Office and with administration function directly under
The regulations that mechanism formulates.
In order to facilitate understanding, the first semantic relation and the second semantic relation are illustrated:
1 first semantic relation of table and the second semantic relation example
Also, there are at least one be applicable in references to judge rule for a standard central issue, and a reference is judged
There are at least one be applicable in laws and regulations provisions again for rule.First semantic relation characterizes standard central issue, and should
Semantic relation between reference judge's rule that standard central issue is applicable in.Second semantic relation is characterized with reference to judge's rule
Then and this is with reference to the semantic relation between the regular laws and regulations provision being applicable in of judge.
In practical applications, it is known that the goal-trail number of packages of a target case according to when, search preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
In standard central issue with the semantic matches of the goal-trail number of packages evidence, further according to the first semantic relation and the second semantic relation,
The laws and regulations provision that rule is applicable in is judged in the applicable reference judge's rule of acquisition standard central issue, and reference.To
Obtain with the relevant judicial cognizance of target case, without using judicial professional knowledge from the goal-trail number of packages evidence of the target case
Middle summary keyword is retrieved, you can acquisition and the relevant judicial cognizance of target case have universal applicability.
In another example, include not only above-mentioned standard central issue in preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates, standard is striven
The applicable reference judge's rule of focus is discussed, with reference to the applicable laws and regulations provision of judge's rule, the first semantic relation and second
Semantic relation, the first semantic relation include standard central issue and the semantic relation with reference to judge between regular, the second semantic pass
System include with reference to judge rule and laws and regulations provision between semantic relation, further include in following the description any one or it is more
Kind:
Content one, case central issue, the standard central issue belonging to case central issue and third semantic relation,
Third semantic relation includes the semantic relation between case central issue and standard central issue;
Content two has the existing case data of case;
Content three has the case central issue of case, the applicable case judge rule and the 4th of case central issue
Semantic relation, the 4th semantic relation include the semantic relation between case central issue and case judge's rule;
Content four has case judge's rule of case, the reference judge rule and the 5th belonging to case judge's rule
Semantic relation, the 5th semantic relation include case judge rule and the semantic relation with reference to judge between regular;
Content five has the existing case data of case, and the case facts for having case describe, belonging to case facts description
The standard fact description, the 6th semantic relation, the 6th semantic relation include case facts description the standard fact describe between
Semantic relation.
When specific implementation, preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates is in addition to including above-mentioned standard central issue, standard central issue
Applicable reference judge is regular, with reference to the applicable laws and regulations provision of judge's rule, the first semantic relation and the second semantic pass
Other than the content of system, can also include the above one to content five in any one, can also include the above one to
Arbitrary N kinds (N is less than five) in content five, can also include all the elements in the above one to content five.By technology people
Member's specific setting according to actual needs, here without specifically limiting.It is understood that preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
Included in content it is more, according to goal-trail number of packages according to can be obtained also getting over the relevant judicial cognizance of target case
It is more.
In order to facilitate understanding, to the first semantic relation included in judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates, the second semantic relation, third language
Adopted relationship, the 4th semantic relation and the 5th semantic relation are illustrated:
2 first semantic relation of table, the second semantic relation, third semantic relation, the 4th semantic relation and the 5th semantic pass
It is example
What needs to be explained here is that in table 2 docket can one existing case of unique mark, according to the docket
The existing case data for having case can be obtained.Case central issue is the central issue for having case.Standard is disputed on
Focus is the standard central issue having belonging to the case central issue of case.Case judge's rule is to have the judge of case
Rule.It is the standard judge rule and standard central issue having belonging to case judge's rule of case with reference to judge's rule
The reference judge's rule being applicable in.Laws and regulations provision is the laws and regulations provision being applicable in reference to judge's rule.
In order to facilitate understanding, the 6th semantic relation in judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates is illustrated:
The 6th semantic relation example of table 3
In another example, preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates further includes that the standard fact is retouched other than including the above
State the correspondence with standard fact template.One standard fact description corresponds to a standard fact template, and the standard fact is retouched
It is to a kind of true standard describing mode to state, and standard fact template is that the description of the standard fact is used template form carry out table
Show.The goal-trail number of packages evidence of known target case searches the language with the goal-trail number of packages evidence from preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
The matched case facts description of justice, the standard fact obtained belonging to case facts description further according to above-mentioned 6th semantic relation are retouched
It states, and then obtains the standard fact and describe corresponding standard fact template.Again according to the goal-trail number of packages evidence, from the preset administration of justice
Obtain that (including standard central issue, case central issue, case are cut out with the relevant judicial cognizance of target case in knowledge mapping
Rule is sentenced, with reference to judge's rule, laws and regulations provision), according to the judicial cognizance that user is selected from above-mentioned judicial cognizance, utilize
The standard fact template automatically generates judgement document.
In order to facilitate understanding, template is implemented with standard to the description of the judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates Plays fact and is illustrated:
The 4 standard fact of table describes to implement template instances with standard
It is understood that the example described in above-mentioned table 1, table 2, table 3 and table 4, is to be better understood from this hair
Example cited by bright provided technical solution when specific implementation, is not limited in table 1, table 2, described in table 3 and table 4
Example, further include other similar particular contents in judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates, which is not described herein again.
In another example, preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates is other than including the above, further include judicial cognizance with
The correspondence of the keyword of the judicial cognizance, judicial cognizance include standard central issue, with reference to judge's rule, laws and regulations item
Text, the standard fact description and standard fact template in any one or more.It is thereby also possible to according to keyword from pre-
If intellectual property collection of illustrative plates in search the corresponding judicial cognizance of the keyword.
Can also include general knowledge of laws data in addition, in the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates, which includes
The law court that the country is set up, the hierarchical relationship between each law court, the administrative region etc. that each law court is administered.
It follows that the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates provided in the embodiment of the present invention, defines a large amount of administration of justice and knows
Semantic relation between knowledge and judicial cognizance.Using the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates, intelligent recommendation and mesh may be implemented
Mark the relevant judicial cognizance of case.Keyword is summed up from the case data of target case without user, into without user
It is horizontal that very high judicial cognizance must be possessed, to which general applicability is high.
How the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates that the analysis and utilization embodiment of the present invention is provided one by one below, realize recommendation department
Method knowledge.
Fig. 1 is method one example flow chart provided in an embodiment of the present invention for recommending judicial cognizance, including:
101:The goal-trail number of packages evidence for obtaining target case, to the goal-trail number of packages according to progress semantic analysis.
102:It searches from preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates and disputes on the standard of the semantic matches of the goal-trail number of packages evidence
Focus is as the first standard central issue.
103:Using first semantic relation, from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates obtaining first standard strives
The applicable reference judge of view focus is regular to be preset using second semantic relation from described as first reference judge's rule
Judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates in obtain described first with reference to the applicable laws and regulations provision of judge's rule as the first laws and regulations item
Text.
In method shown in Fig. 1, preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates includes standard central issue, and standard central issue is applicable in
Reference judge's rule, with reference to the applicable laws and regulations provision of judge's rule, the first semantic relation and the second semantic relation,
First semantic relation includes standard central issue and the semantic relation with reference to judge between regular, and the second semantic relation includes reference
Semantic relation between judge's rule and laws and regulations provision.
Target case refers to existing prosecution requirement, the cases data such as response content and court's trial debate content, also not
The case made decisions.The case data of a target case are obtained as goal-trail number of packages evidence.Using arbitrary in the prior art
A kind of semantic analysis mode, to the goal-trail number of packages according to progress semantic analysis.By goal-trail number of packages evidence and preset judicial cognizance
Standard central issue in collection of illustrative plates carries out semantic matches, searches and makees according to the standard central issue of semantic matches with the goal-trail number of packages
For the first standard central issue.
What needs to be explained here is that case data include litigious party's information, case reason, plaintiff or appellant's
The reply content of claims, defendant or appellee, evidence material, court's trial notes, case central issue, case judge's rule
Then, the laws and regulations provision which is applicable in, the court verdict of case.Have case data in addition to including above-mentioned case data
In addition, further include the judgement document for having case.Goal-trail number of packages does not include judge's text according to only including above-mentioned case data
Book.
Under normal circumstances, a first threshold is pre-defined, if goal-trail number of packages is according to the semanteme with standard central issue
When matching degree is more than the first threshold, the semantic matches of goal-trail number of packages evidence and standard central issue are indicated, then the standard is striven
View focus belongs to the first standard central issue.
What needs to be explained here is that under normal circumstances, in preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates, standard central issue includes the mark
The description content of the title of quasi- central issue and the standard central issue, by goal-trail number of packages evidence and preset judicial cognizance
Standard central issue in collection of illustrative plates carries out semantic matches, refers to goal-trail number of packages according to the description content with standard central issue
Carry out semantic matches.
In preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates, including the first semantic relation, the first semantic relation include standard central issue with
With reference to the semantic relation between judge's rule.The applicable reference judge's rule of first semantic relation signature criteria central issue, profit
With the first semantic relation, the applicable reference judge rule of the first standard central issue is obtained as first with reference to judge's rule.It is right
For the same standard central issue, the reference judge rule being applicable in is it is possible that there are one only, it is also possible to have multiple.Profit
With the first semantic relation, all reference judge's rules that the first standard central issue is applicable in can be obtained.
In preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates, including the second semantic relation, the second semantic relation include with reference to judge's rule with
Semantic relation between laws and regulations provision.Second semantic relation characterization is with reference to the applicable laws and regulations provision of judge's rule, profit
With the second semantic relation, first is obtained with reference to the applicable laws and regulations provision of judge's rule as the first laws and regulations provision.Together
Reason, for same with reference to judging for rule, the laws and regulations provision being applicable in may only have one, it is also possible to have more
Item.Using the second semantic relation, the first all laws and regulations provisions being applicable in reference to judge's rule can be obtained.Certainly,
In practical application, rule can be judged from the first reference with reference to needed for being selected in judge's rule, merely with the second semantic relation
Obtain the selected laws and regulations provision being applicable in reference to judge's rule.
Using method shown in FIG. 1, by goal-trail number of packages evidence and the standard central issue in preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
Semantic matches are carried out, are obtained and the relevant first standard central issue of target case.It is (judicial obtaining the first standard central issue
Knowledge) when, not needing to user, the analysis and summary in obtain keyword related with standard central issue from goal-trail number of packages, and
It is that original goal-trail number of packages is subjected to semantic matches according to the standard central issue in preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates.User is only
Goal-trail number of packages is inputted according to not needing to user has very high judicial level of expertise, general applicability high.Also,
Using the above method, same goal-trail number of packages is to determine according to obtained first standard central issue.It also avoids using existing
When having the method that technology is provided, different user is different from the same goal-trail number of packages keyword that analysis and summary obtain in, into
And cause obtained standard central issue also different.
Using method shown in FIG. 1, when known to the first standard central issue, in preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates is utilized
One semantic relation can also obtain the first standard central issue is applicable in first with reference to judge's rule;Utilize the second semantic pass
System can obtain first the first laws and regulations provision being applicable in reference to judge's rule.In the prior art, by user according to target
Keyword is summarized in case data analysis, using keyword retrieval with reference to judge's rule and laws and regulations provision, only judicial cognizance
Horizontal very high judge and lawyer could accurately retrieve relevant with reference to judge's rule, Yi Jisuo with the target case
Applicable laws and regulations provision, general applicability are poor.
In the first instance, as shown in Fig. 2, the case that the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates further includes existing case is striven
Discuss focus, the standard central issue belonging to the case central issue and third semantic relation, the third semantic relation packet
The semantic relation between the case central issue and the standard central issue is included, the method further includes:
201:Obtain the second standard central issue chosen from the first standard central issue.
202:Using the third semantic relation, from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates obtaining second standard strives
The first case central issue that view focus is included.
In the above-described example, in preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates further include the case central issue for having case, the case
Standard central issue belonging to part central issue and third semantic relation, have case case central issue, refer to from
It is obtained in existing case data, corresponds to the central issue of specific existing case.The particular content of case central issue with
The content for having case data is related, has case otherness.One case central issue belongs to a standard central issue, mark
The publication of official of quasi- central issue judicial department, the standard of central issue is stated, there is general character.For different existing cases
For, there are the case central issues of different expression, if the essential content of case central issue is identical, belong to the same standard
Central issue.
Third semantic relation is then the language of the standard central issue belonging to case central issue and the case central issue
Adopted relationship.After obtaining the first standard central issue, user can choose institute from the first standard central issue according to actual needs
The standard central issue of concern is as the second standard central issue.And then third semantic relation can be utilized, from the preset administration of justice
Case central issue that the second standard central issue is included is obtained in knowledge mapping as the first case central issue.It is preset
Judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates is established based on a large amount of existing case data, is existed largely in the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
There is the detailed description of the case central issue of case.User can select the second standard central issue of interest, to
Obtain the detailed description for the first case central issue for belonging to the second standard central issue.
It is understood that in practical applications, when known to the case central issue of target case, can also utilize this
Three semantic relations obtain the standard central issue belonging to the case central issue.
Based on first example, in second example, as shown in figure 3, the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates is also
Existing case data including the existing case, the method further include:
301:Obtain the second case central issue selected from the first case central issue.
302:Determine that first belonging to the second case central issue has from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
Case set.
303:Obtain the second existing case set chosen from the described first existing case set.
304:The existing case data of the described second existing case set are obtained from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates.
One case central issue belongs to one, and specifically existing case, user can select from the first case central issue
It takes case central issue of interest as the second case central issue, and determines having belonging to the second case central issue
Case is as the first existing case set.User chooses existing case of interest as from the first existing case set again
Two existing case set obtain the existing case data of the second existing case set from preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates.
In method shown in Fig. 2, according to goal-trail number of packages according to obtaining the first standard central issue, user is from the first standard
The second standard central issue of interest is selected in central issue, recycles third semantic relation, and it is burnt to obtain the dispute of the second standard
The first case central issue that point includes, it is burnt that user selects the second case of interest to dispute on from the first case central issue again
Point, then determine the first existing case set belonging to the second case central issue, Yong Huzai according to preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
The existing case set of of interest second is chosen from the first existing case set, and is obtained from preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
The existing case data of two existing case set.So as to gradually obtain user's specific case central issue of interest,
And existing case data, user voluntarily can select and check the concrete practice content of various existing cases of interest.
It is, of course, understood that if a known existing case, can also be obtained using the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
This has the existing case data of case, case central issue, the standard central issue belonging to case central issue, standard strives
Reference judge's rule that view focus is applicable in, the laws and regulations provision being applicable in reference to judge's rule.
Based on first example, in third example, as shown in figure 4, the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates is also
Include the case central issue of the existing case, the applicable case judge rule of the case central issue and the 4th language
Adopted relationship, the 4th semantic relation include the semantic relation between the case central issue and case judge's rule,
The method further includes:
401:Using the 4th semantic relation, from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates obtaining first case strives
Discuss applicable the first case judge's rule of focus.
Preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates is established based on a large amount of existing case data, in the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates not
Only include case central issue, further includes the applicable case judge's rule of the case central issue.Case judge's rule, refers to
In specific existing case, to judging rule used by a case central issue.Case judge's rule is also from existing
Obtained in case data, there is case otherness.4th semantic relation is used to characterize case central issue, and should
Semantic relation between the applicable case judge's rule of case central issue.According to the 4th semantic relation, First Case can be obtained
Applicable the first case judge's rule of part central issue, checks and is referred to convenient for user.
Based on third example, in the 4th example, the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates further include it is described
There are the existing case data of case, the method to further include:
It obtains the second case selected from first case judge's rule and judges rule;
Determine that the third belonging to the second case judge rule has case from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
Set;
It obtains from the third and has the 4th existing case set chosen in case set;
The existing case data of the described 4th existing case set are obtained from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates.
Case judge's rule is case judge's rule present in a certain specific existing case, then case judge is regular
When knowing, preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates is utilized, it may be determined that the existing case belonging to case judge's rule.
User can choose case judge rule of interest as the second case judge from the first case judge's rule
Rule determines that the existing case belonging to the second case judge's rule has case as third from preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
Set, user has from third again chooses existing case of interest as the 4th existing case set in case set, from pre-
If judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates in obtain the 4th existing case set existing case data.
Second example and the 4th example provide two different methods and obtain user's existing case number of packages of interest
According to being to determine have case using the case central issue of interest that user chooses, and then obtain this in second example
There are the existing case data of case;4th example is to judge rule using the case of interest that user chooses to determine existing case
Part, and then obtain the existing case data for having case.Any one of the above method may be used, obtain and of interest have
The existing case data of case.
Based on third example, in the 5th example, the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates further include it is described
There are case judge's rule of case, the reference judge rule belonging to the case judge rule and the 5th semantic relation, it is described
5th semantic relation includes the semantic relation between the case judge rule and the rule with reference to judge, and the method is also wrapped
It includes:
Using the 5th semantic relation, the first case judge rule are obtained from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
First belonging to then is regular with reference to judge.
Case judge's rule, obtains from existing case data, corresponds to the sanction present in specific existing case
Sentence rule.The particular content of case judge's rule is related with the existing particular content of case data, has case otherness.One
Case judge's rule belongs to one with reference to judge's rule.It is that official of judicial department issues with reference to judge's rule, to judge's rule
Standard statement, have general character.For different existing cases, there are the case of different expression judge's rules, if case
The essential content of judge's rule is identical, then belongs to the same standard central issue.Utilize the 5th semantic relation, case judge's rule
When then known, reference judge's rule belonging to case judge's rule can also be obtained.
In the 6th example, as shown in figure 5, Fig. 5 illustrates only inquiry and target from preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
The method of the data content of the relevant existing case of case, method shown in fig. 5 can be used alone, can also with shown in Fig. 1
Method be used in combination, here without specifically limiting.
The preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates further includes the existing case data for having case, the case of the existing case
Fact description, the affiliated standard fact description of the case facts description, the 6th semantic relation, the 6th semantic relation include
Semantic relation between the case facts description and standard fact description, the method further include:
501:First with the semantic matches of the goal-trail number of packages evidence is searched from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
Has case collective data.
502:The 5th belonging to the first existing case collective data is determined from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
Has case set.
503:The first case facts of the described 5th existing case set are obtained from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
Description.
504:Using the 6th semantic relation, the first case thing is obtained from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
First standard fact description belonging to real description.
Case facts describe, and are obtained from existing case data, are corresponded to present in specifically existing case
Fact description, has case otherness.One case facts description belongs to a standard fact description.The description of the standard fact is department
The publication of official of method department, the standard of fact description is stated, there is general character.
By goal-trail number of packages according to and existing case data in preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates carry out semantic matches, obtain with
Goal-trail number of packages is according to the existing case data of semantic matches as the first existing case collective data.Under normal circumstances, fixed in advance
An adopted second threshold, if goal-trail number of packages is more than the second threshold according to the semantic matching degree with existing case data, table
Show the goal-trail number of packages according to the semantic matches with existing case data, then it is to belong to the first existing case that this, which has case data,
Collective data.Determine the existing case described in the first existing case collective data as the 5th existing case set.From preset
The case facts description that the 5th existing case set is obtained in judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates is described as the first case facts, and then is utilized
6th semantic relation obtains the standard fact description belonging to first case facts description and is described as the first standard fact.
It is understood that when the known standard fact describes, the 6th semantic relation can also be utilized, obtains the standard fact
The included case facts description of description.
Based on the 6th example, in the 7th example, the method further includes:
It counts each described first standard fact and describes occurred number;
Most the first standard fact description of the number occurred is obtained to describe as the second standard fact;
Export the second standard fact description.
By the content described in the 6th example it is found that the first existing case with the semantic matches of the goal-trail number of packages evidence
There are multiple, then the first case facts description for being obtained from preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates also has multiple part collective data.By
Same standard fact description is likely corresponded in different case facts descriptions, determines the description of each first case facts respectively
Affiliated first standard fact description counts each first standard fact and describes occurred number, and occurrence number is most
The first standard fact description as the second standard fact description output.
It is understood that specific implementation when, can also according to appearance number from high to low, be sequentially output in sequence
Multiple first standard fact descriptions.Each first standard fact can also be exported and describe occurred number.It can also basis
The selection of user, output user first standard fact description of interest.
Based on the 6th example, in the 8th example, as shown in fig. 6, the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates further includes
The correspondence of the standard fact description and standard fact template, the method further include:
601:Obtain selected third standard fact description from the first standard fact description.
602:The third standard fact is obtained from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates describes the corresponding standard fact
Template is as target criteria fact template.
603:The case central issue of the described 5th existing case set is obtained from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
As third case central issue.
604:Obtain the 4th case central issue chosen from the third case central issue.
605:Using the third semantic relation, obtains and obtain the 4th case from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
Standard central issue belonging to central issue is as third standard central issue.
The regular conduct of case judge of the described 5th existing case set is obtained from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
Second case judge's rule;
It obtains the third case selected from second case judge's rule and judges rule;
Using the 5th semantic relation, the third case judge rule are obtained from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
Reference judge rule belonging to then is as second with reference to judge's rule;
Using second semantic relation, described second is obtained from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates with reference to judge's rule
Then applicable laws and regulations provision is as the second laws and regulations provision;
Using the target criteria fact template, the third standard central issue, the 4th case central issue, institute
Third case judge's rule is stated, described second generates judgement document with reference to judge's rule and the second laws and regulations provision.
Method shown in fig. 6 provides a kind of technical solution automatically generating judgement document.Preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
It include the correspondence of standard fact description and standard fact template.First existing case collective data and goal-trail number of packages evidence
Semantic matches obtain the case facts wood number difficult to understand of the 5th existing case set belonging to the first existing case collective data as the
One case facts describe, then the standard fact description belonging to the description of the first case facts is obtained from preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
It is described as the first standard fact.
User chooses standard fact description of interest from the description of the first standard fact and is described as the third standard fact,
Under normal circumstances, the third standard fact description selected by user is the standard fact description most like with target case, can
With for describing the particular content of the target case.The description of the third standard fact is obtained from preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates to correspond to
Standard fact template as target criteria fact template, judgement document is automatically generated using the target criteria fact template.It should
In target criteria fact template, it is also necessary to addition and the relevant judicial cognizance of target case.
5th existing case set is the existing case with the semantic matches of the target case, from preset judicial cognizance figure
The case central issue of the 5th existing case set is obtained in spectrum as third case central issue, user strives from the third case
The 4th case central issue of interest is chosen in view focus.The 4th semantic relation is recycled, the 4th case central issue is obtained
Affiliated standard central issue is as third standard central issue.
5th existing case set is the existing case with the semantic matches of the target case, from preset judicial cognizance figure
The case judge rule of the 5th existing case set is obtained in spectrum as third case judge's rule, using the second semantic relation,
The reference judge rule belonging to third case judge's rule is obtained as second with reference to judge's rule.(it is, of course, also possible to utilize
One semantic relation obtains reference judge's rule that third standard central issue is applicable in and is used as second reference judge's rule.) sharp again
With the second semantic relation, second is obtained with reference to the applicable laws and regulations provision of judge's rule as the second laws and regulations provision.
Utilize target criteria fact template, third standard central issue, third standard central issue, the 4th case dispute coke
Point, third case judge's rule, second generates judgement document with reference to judge's rule and the second laws and regulations provision, automatic raw
At judgement document.
Also, in the judgement document generated, the content for needing user voluntarily to fill in is marked with special marking.
The method shown in fig. 6 for automatically generating judgement document, based on the administration of justice provided in preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
Semantic relation between knowledge and judicial cognizance, standard used by standard fact description defined in judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
True template, user is from being recommended to select required judicial cognizance with the relevant judicial cognizance of target case, by the administration of justice
In filling to standard fact template, judgement document is automatically generated to realize automatically for knowledge.
It further include the pass of judicial cognizance and the judicial cognizance in the 9th example, in the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
The correspondence of keyword, the judicial cognizance include the standard central issue, described with reference to judge's rule, the laws and regulations
Provision, any one or more in standard fact description and the standard fact template, the method further includes:
Obtain keyword;
According to the keyword the corresponding judicial cognizance of the keyword is searched from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates.
Further include the correspondence of judicial cognizance and the keyword of the judicial cognizance in preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates,
The keyword inputted according to user is also provided, the function of the corresponding judicial cognizance of the keyword is searched.
In summary content, it is burnt that the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates that the embodiment of the present invention is provided provides standard dispute
Point, with reference to judge's rule, laws and regulations provision, the description of the standard fact, standard fact template, case central issue, case reference
Rule, case facts description, has the incidence relation between the contents such as case data, the webbed collection of illustrative plates structure of shape, such as Fig. 7 institutes
Show.
On the one hand, it is not necessarily to user and summarizes keyword progress precise search, utilize preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates, it is only necessary to use
Family inputs goal-trail number of packages evidence, you can obtains and the relevant judicial cognizance of target case.On the other hand, it forms burnt to dispute
Point, judge's rule, the statement of the standardization such as fact description have obtained standard central issue, with reference to judge's rule and standard thing
Real description.Corresponding standard fact template is described with the standard fact in another aspect, providing, using standard fact template, and
Judicial cognizance obtained in preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates, can realize and automatically generate judgement document.Another aspect, this is pre-
If judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates the existing case data of existing case similar with target case can also be provided, case dispute is burnt
Point, case judges the various specific case data such as rule, with for reference.
Fig. 8 is the apparatus structure schematic diagram provided in an embodiment of the present invention for recommending judicial cognizance, including:
Semantic analysis unit 801, the goal-trail number of packages evidence for obtaining target case, to the goal-trail number of packages according to progress
Semantic analysis.
First searching unit 802, for searching the language with the goal-trail number of packages evidence from preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
For the matched standard central issue of justice as the first standard central issue, the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates includes that standard dispute is burnt
Point, the applicable reference judge's rule of the standard central issue, the laws and regulations provision applicable with reference to judge's rule, first
Semantic relation and the second semantic relation, first semantic relation include that the standard central issue is judged with the reference
Semantic relation between rule, second semantic relation include described with reference between judge's rule and the laws and regulations provision
Semantic relation.
First acquisition unit 803 is obtained for utilizing first semantic relation from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
The reference judge rule for taking the first standard central issue applicable is semantic using described second as first reference judge's rule
Relationship obtains described first with reference to the applicable laws and regulations provision conduct of judge's rule from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
First laws and regulations provision.
In one example, the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates further includes the case central issue for having case, described
Standard central issue belonging to case central issue and third semantic relation, the third semantic relation include the case
Semantic relation between central issue and the standard central issue, described device further include:
Second acquisition unit, for obtaining the second standard central issue chosen from the first standard central issue;
Third acquiring unit is obtained for utilizing the third semantic relation from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
The first case central issue that the second standard central issue is included.
In one example, the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates further includes the existing case data of the existing case,
Described device further includes:
4th acquiring unit, for obtaining the second case central issue selected from the first case central issue;
First determination unit, for determining the second case central issue institute from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
The the first existing case set belonged to;
5th acquiring unit, for obtaining the second existing case set chosen from the described first existing case set;
6th acquiring unit, for obtaining the described second existing case set from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
Have case data.
In one example, the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates further includes the case central issue of the existing case,
The applicable case judge rule of the case central issue and the 4th semantic relation, the 4th semantic relation include described
Semantic relation between case central issue and case judge's rule, described device further include:
7th acquiring unit is obtained for utilizing the 4th semantic relation from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
Applicable the first case judge's rule of the first case central issue.
In one example, the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates further includes the existing case data of the existing case,
Described device further includes:
8th acquiring unit judges rule for obtaining the second case selected from first case judge's rule;
Second determination unit, for determining the regular institute of the second case judge from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
The third of category has case set;
9th acquiring unit has the 4th existing case set chosen in case set for obtaining from the third;
Tenth acquiring unit, for obtaining the described 4th existing case set from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
Have case data.
In one example, the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates further includes case judge's rule of the existing case,
Reference judge rule belonging to the case judge rule and the 5th semantic relation, the 5th semantic relation include described
Semantic relation between case judge rule and the rule with reference to judge, described device further include:
11st acquiring unit is obtained for utilizing the 5th semantic relation from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
Take first belonging to the first case judge rule with reference to judge's rule.
In one example, the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates further includes the existing case data for having case, described
Have a case facts description of case, the standard fact description belonging to case facts description, the 6th semantic relation, described the
Six semantic relations include the semantic relation between the case facts description and standard fact description, and described device is also wrapped
It includes:
Second searching unit, for searching the language with the goal-trail number of packages evidence from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
The matched first existing case collective data of justice;
Third determination unit, for determining the first existing case set number from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
According to the 5th affiliated existing case set;
12nd acquiring unit, for obtaining the described 5th existing case set from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
The first case facts description;
13rd acquiring unit is obtained for utilizing the 6th semantic relation from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
Obtain the first standard fact description belonging to the first case facts description.
In one example, described device further includes:
Statistic unit describes occurred number for counting each described first standard fact;
14th acquiring unit, for obtaining most the first standard fact description of the number occurred as the second mark
Accurate true description;
Output unit, for exporting the second standard fact description.
In one example, the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates further includes the standard fact description and standard fact mould
The correspondence of plate, described device further include:
15th acquiring unit, the third standard fact for obtaining selected from the first standard fact description are retouched
It states;
16th acquiring unit, for obtaining the third standard fact description from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
Corresponding standard fact template is as target criteria fact template;
17th acquiring unit, for obtaining the described 5th existing case set from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
Case central issue as third case central issue;
18th acquiring unit, it is burnt for obtaining the 4th case chosen from third case central issue dispute
Point;
19th acquiring unit is obtained for utilizing the third semantic relation from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
Take the standard central issue belonging to the 4th case central issue as third standard central issue;
20th acquiring unit, for obtaining the described 5th existing case set from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
Case judge rule as the second case judge rule;
21st acquiring unit judges rule for obtaining the third case selected from second case judge's rule
Then;
22nd acquiring unit, for utilizing the 5th semantic relation, from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
The reference judge rule belonging to the third case judge rule is obtained as second with reference to judge's rule;
23rd acquiring unit, for utilizing second semantic relation, from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
Described second is obtained with reference to the applicable laws and regulations provision of judge's rule as the second laws and regulations provision;
Generation unit, for utilizing the target criteria fact template, the third standard central issue, the 4th case
Part central issue, the third case judge rule, described second with reference to judge's rule and the second laws and regulations provision
Generate judgement document.
In one example, further include the key of judicial cognizance and the judicial cognizance in the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
The correspondence of word, the judicial cognizance include the standard central issue, described with reference to judge's rule, the laws and regulations item
Text, any one or more in standard fact description and the standard fact template, described device further includes:
24th acquiring unit, for obtaining keyword;
Third searching unit, for searching the key from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates according to the keyword
The corresponding judicial cognizance of word.
The device of judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates shown in Fig. 8 is corresponding to the method with Fig. 1 to judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates shown in Fig. 7
Device, specific implementation is similar to method shown in Fig. 7 with Fig. 1, referring to figs. 1 to the description of method shown in Fig. 7, here
It repeats no more.
The embodiment of the present invention also provides the model of judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates, including:
First semantic modules, for storing the first semantic relation, first semantic relation includes that the standard dispute is burnt
Semantic relation between point and the rule with reference to judge;
Second semantic modules, for storing the second semantic relation, second semantic relation includes described with reference to judge's rule
The then semantic relation between the laws and regulations provision.
In one example, the model further includes:
Third semantic modules, the 4th semantic modules, the 5th semantic modules, in the 6th semantic modules and formwork module
Any one or more;
Third semantic modules, for storing third semantic relation, the third semantic relation includes that the case dispute is burnt
Semantic relation between point and the standard central issue;
4th semantic modules, for storing the 4th semantic relation, the 4th semantic relation includes that the case dispute is burnt
Semantic relation between point and case judge's rule;
5th semantic modules, for storing the 5th semantic relation, the 5th semantic relation includes the case judge rule
The then semantic relation between the rule with reference to judge;
6th semantic modules, for storing the 6th semantic relation, the 6th semantic relation includes that the case facts are retouched
State the semantic relation between standard fact description
Formwork module further includes the standard fact description and standard thing for storing the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
The correspondence of real template.
The device of the recommendation judicial cognizance includes processor and memory, and above-mentioned semantic analysis unit, first search list
Member and first acquisition unit etc. are used as program unit storage in memory, are executed on stored in memory by processor
Program unit is stated to realize corresponding function.
Include kernel in processor, is gone in memory to transfer corresponding program unit by kernel.Kernel can be arranged one
Or more, the technical solution of intelligent recommendation judicial cognizance is realized by adjusting kernel parameter.
Memory may include computer-readable medium in volatile memory, random access memory (RAM) and/
Or the forms such as Nonvolatile memory, if read-only memory (ROM) or flash memory (flash RAM), memory include at least one deposit
Store up chip.
An embodiment of the present invention provides a kind of storage mediums, are stored thereon with program, real when which is executed by processor
The existing method for recommending judicial cognizance.
An embodiment of the present invention provides a kind of processor, the processor is for running program, wherein described program is run
Recommend the method for judicial cognizance described in Shi Zhihang.
An embodiment of the present invention provides a kind of equipment, equipment include processor, memory and storage on a memory and can
The program run on a processor, processor realize following steps when executing program:
The goal-trail number of packages evidence for obtaining target case, to the goal-trail number of packages according to progress semantic analysis;
The standard central issue with the semantic matches of the goal-trail number of packages evidence is searched from preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
As the first standard central issue, the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates includes standard central issue, the standard central issue
Applicable reference judge's rule, the laws and regulations provision applicable with reference to judge's rule, the first semantic relation and the second language
Adopted relationship, first semantic relation include the semantic relation between the standard central issue and the rule with reference to judge,
Second semantic relation includes the semantic relation with reference between judge's rule and the laws and regulations provision;
Using first semantic relation, it is burnt that the first standard dispute is obtained from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
The applicable reference judge's rule of point is used as first with reference to judge's rule, using second semantic relation, from the preset department
Described first is obtained in method knowledge mapping with reference to the applicable laws and regulations provision of judge's rule as the first laws and regulations provision.
In one example, the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates further includes the case central issue for having case, described
Standard central issue belonging to case central issue and third semantic relation, the third semantic relation include the case
Semantic relation between central issue and the standard central issue, the step further include:
Obtain the second standard central issue chosen from the first standard central issue;
Using the third semantic relation, it is burnt that the second standard dispute is obtained from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
The first included case central issue of point.
In one example, the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates further includes the existing case data of the existing case,
The step further includes:
Obtain the second case central issue selected from the first case central issue;
The first existing case belonging to the second case central issue is determined from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
Set;
Obtain the second existing case set chosen from the described first existing case set;
The existing case data of the described second existing case set are obtained from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates.
In one example, the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates further includes the case central issue of the existing case,
The applicable case judge rule of the case central issue and the 4th semantic relation, the 4th semantic relation include described
Semantic relation between case central issue and case judge's rule, the step further include:
Using the 4th semantic relation, it is burnt that the first case dispute is obtained from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
Applicable the first case judge's rule of point.
In one example, the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates further includes the existing case data of the existing case,
The step further includes:
It obtains the second case selected from first case judge's rule and judges rule;
Determine that the third belonging to the second case judge rule has case from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
Set;
It obtains from the third and has the 4th existing case set chosen in case set;
The existing case data of the described 4th existing case set are obtained from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates.
In one example, the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates further includes case judge's rule of the existing case,
Reference judge rule belonging to the case judge rule and the 5th semantic relation, the 5th semantic relation include described
Semantic relation between case judge rule and the rule with reference to judge, the step further include:
Using the 5th semantic relation, the first case judge rule are obtained from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
First belonging to then is regular with reference to judge.
In one example, the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates further includes the existing case data for having case, described
Have a case facts description of case, the standard fact description belonging to case facts description, the 6th semantic relation, described the
Six semantic relations include the semantic relation between the case facts description and standard fact description, which further includes:
It searches from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates and has with the first of the semantic matches of the goal-trail number of packages evidence
Case collective data;
Determine that the belonging to the first existing case collective data the 5th has from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
Case set;
The first case facts description of the described 5th existing case set is obtained from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates;
Using the 6th semantic relation, from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates obtaining first case facts retouches
First standard fact description belonging to stating.
In one example, which further includes:
It counts each described first standard fact and describes occurred number;
Most the first standard fact description of the number occurred is obtained to describe as the second standard fact;
Export the second standard fact description.
In one example, the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates further includes the standard fact description and standard fact mould
The correspondence of plate, the step further include:
Obtain selected third standard fact description from the first standard fact description;
The third standard fact, which is obtained, from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates describes corresponding standard fact template
As target criteria fact template;
The case central issue conduct of the described 5th existing case set is obtained from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
Third case central issue;
Obtain the 4th case central issue chosen from the third case central issue;
Using the third semantic relation, it is burnt that the 4th case dispute is obtained from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
Standard central issue belonging to point is as third standard central issue;
The regular conduct of case judge of the described 5th existing case set is obtained from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
Second case judge's rule;
It obtains the third case selected from second case judge's rule and judges rule;
Using the 5th semantic relation, the third case judge rule are obtained from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
Reference judge rule belonging to then is as second with reference to judge's rule;
Using second semantic relation, described second is obtained from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates with reference to judge's rule
Then applicable laws and regulations provision is as the second laws and regulations provision;
Using the target criteria fact template, the third standard central issue, the 4th case central issue, institute
Third case judge's rule is stated, described second generates judgement document with reference to judge's rule and the second laws and regulations provision.
In one example, further include the key of judicial cognizance and the judicial cognizance in the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
The correspondence of word, the judicial cognizance include the standard central issue, described with reference to judge's rule, the laws and regulations item
Text, any one or more in standard fact description and the standard fact template, which further includes:
Obtain keyword;
According to the keyword the corresponding judicial cognizance of the keyword is searched from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates.
Equipment herein can be server, PC, PAD, mobile phone etc..
Present invention also provides a kind of computer program products, when being executed on data processing equipment, are adapted for carrying out just
The program of beginningization there are as below methods step:
The goal-trail number of packages evidence for obtaining target case, to the goal-trail number of packages according to progress semantic analysis;
The standard central issue with the semantic matches of the goal-trail number of packages evidence is searched from preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
As the first standard central issue, the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates includes standard central issue, the standard central issue
Applicable reference judge's rule, the laws and regulations provision applicable with reference to judge's rule, the first semantic relation and the second language
Adopted relationship, first semantic relation include the semantic relation between the standard central issue and the rule with reference to judge,
Second semantic relation includes the semantic relation with reference between judge's rule and the laws and regulations provision;
Using first semantic relation, it is burnt that the first standard dispute is obtained from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
The applicable reference judge's rule of point is used as first with reference to judge's rule, using second semantic relation, from the preset department
Described first is obtained in method knowledge mapping with reference to the applicable laws and regulations provision of judge's rule as the first laws and regulations provision.
In one example, the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates further includes the case central issue for having case, described
Standard central issue belonging to case central issue and third semantic relation, the third semantic relation include the case
Semantic relation between central issue and the standard central issue, the step further include:
Obtain the second standard central issue chosen from the first standard central issue;
Using the third semantic relation, it is burnt that the second standard dispute is obtained from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
The first included case central issue of point.
In one example, the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates further includes the existing case data of the existing case,
The step further includes:
Obtain the second case central issue selected from the first case central issue;
The first existing case belonging to the second case central issue is determined from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
Set;
Obtain the second existing case set chosen from the described first existing case set;
The existing case data of the described second existing case set are obtained from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates.
In one example, the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates further includes the case central issue of the existing case,
The applicable case judge rule of the case central issue and the 4th semantic relation, the 4th semantic relation include described
Semantic relation between case central issue and case judge's rule, the step further include:
Using the 4th semantic relation, it is burnt that the first case dispute is obtained from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
Applicable the first case judge's rule of point.
In one example, the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates further includes the existing case data of the existing case,
The step further includes:
It obtains the second case selected from first case judge's rule and judges rule;
Determine that the third belonging to the second case judge rule has case from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
Set;
It obtains from the third and has the 4th existing case set chosen in case set;
The existing case data of the described 4th existing case set are obtained from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates.
In one example, the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates further includes case judge's rule of the existing case,
Reference judge rule belonging to the case judge rule and the 5th semantic relation, the 5th semantic relation include described
Semantic relation between case judge rule and the rule with reference to judge, the step further include:
Using the 5th semantic relation, the first case judge rule are obtained from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
First belonging to then is regular with reference to judge.
In one example, the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates further includes the existing case data for having case, described
Have a case facts description of case, the standard fact description belonging to case facts description, the 6th semantic relation, described the
Six semantic relations include the semantic relation between the case facts description and standard fact description, which further includes:
It searches from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates and has with the first of the semantic matches of the goal-trail number of packages evidence
Case collective data;
Determine that the belonging to the first existing case collective data the 5th has from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
Case set;
The first case facts description of the described 5th existing case set is obtained from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates;
Using the 6th semantic relation, from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates obtaining first case facts retouches
First standard fact description belonging to stating.
In one example, which further includes:
It counts each described first standard fact and describes occurred number;
Most the first standard fact description of the number occurred is obtained to describe as the second standard fact;
Export the second standard fact description.
In one example, the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates further includes the standard fact description and standard fact mould
The correspondence of plate, the step further include:
Obtain selected third standard fact description from the first standard fact description;
The third standard fact, which is obtained, from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates describes corresponding standard fact template
As target criteria fact template;
The case central issue conduct of the described 5th existing case set is obtained from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
Third case central issue;
Obtain the 4th case central issue chosen from the third case central issue;
Using the third semantic relation, it is burnt that the 4th case dispute is obtained from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
Standard central issue belonging to point is as third standard central issue;
The regular conduct of case judge of the described 5th existing case set is obtained from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
Second case judge's rule;
It obtains the third case selected from second case judge's rule and judges rule;
Using the 5th semantic relation, the third case judge rule are obtained from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
Reference judge rule belonging to then is as second with reference to judge's rule;
Using second semantic relation, described second is obtained from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates with reference to judge's rule
Then applicable laws and regulations provision is as the second laws and regulations provision;
Using the target criteria fact template, the third standard central issue, the 4th case central issue, institute
Third case judge's rule is stated, described second generates judgement document with reference to judge's rule and the second laws and regulations provision.
In one example, further include the key of judicial cognizance and the judicial cognizance in the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
The correspondence of word, the judicial cognizance include the standard central issue, described with reference to judge's rule, the laws and regulations item
Text, any one or more in standard fact description and the standard fact template, which further includes:
Obtain keyword;
According to the keyword the corresponding judicial cognizance of the keyword is searched from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates.
It should be understood by those skilled in the art that, embodiments herein can be provided as method, system or computer program
Product.Therefore, complete hardware embodiment, complete software embodiment or reality combining software and hardware aspects can be used in the application
Apply the form of example.Moreover, the application can be used in one or more wherein include computer usable program code computer
The computer program production implemented in usable storage medium (including but not limited to magnetic disk storage, CD-ROM, optical memory etc.)
The form of product.
The application is with reference to method, the flow of equipment (system) and computer program product according to the embodiment of the present application
Figure and/or block diagram describe.It should be understood that can be realized by computer program instructions every first-class in flowchart and/or the block diagram
The combination of flow and/or box in journey and/or box and flowchart and/or the block diagram.These computer programs can be provided
Instruct the processor of all-purpose computer, special purpose computer, Embedded Processor or other programmable data processing devices to produce
A raw machine so that the instruction executed by computer or the processor of other programmable data processing devices is generated for real
The device for the function of being specified in present one flow of flow chart or one box of multiple flows and/or block diagram or multiple boxes.
These computer program instructions, which may also be stored in, can guide computer or other programmable data processing devices with spy
Determine in the computer-readable memory that mode works so that instruction generation stored in the computer readable memory includes referring to
Enable the manufacture of device, the command device realize in one flow of flow chart or multiple flows and/or one box of block diagram or
The function of being specified in multiple boxes.
These computer program instructions also can be loaded onto a computer or other programmable data processing device so that count
Series of operation steps are executed on calculation machine or other programmable devices to generate computer implemented processing, in computer or
The instruction executed on other programmable devices is provided for realizing in one flow of flow chart or multiple flows and/or block diagram one
The step of function of being specified in a box or multiple boxes.
In a typical configuration, computing device includes one or more processors (CPU), input/output interface, net
Network interface and memory.
Memory may include computer-readable medium in volatile memory, random access memory (RAM) and/
Or the forms such as Nonvolatile memory, such as read-only memory (ROM) or flash memory (flash RAM).Memory is computer-readable Jie
The example of matter.
Computer-readable medium includes permanent and non-permanent, removable and non-removable media can be by any method
Or technology realizes information storage.Information can be computer-readable instruction, data structure, the module of program or other data.
The example of the storage medium of computer includes, but are not limited to phase transition internal memory (PRAM), static RAM (SRAM), moves
State random access memory (DRAM), other kinds of random access memory (RAM), read-only memory (ROM), electric erasable
Programmable read only memory (EEPROM), fast flash memory bank or other memory techniques, read-only disc read only memory (CD-ROM) (CD-ROM),
Digital versatile disc (DVD) or other optical storages, magnetic tape cassette, tape magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage apparatus
Or any other non-transmission medium, it can be used for storage and can be accessed by a computing device information.As defined in this article, it calculates
Machine readable medium does not include temporary computer readable media (transitory media), such as data-signal and carrier wave of modulation.
It should also be noted that, the terms "include", "comprise" or its any other variant are intended to nonexcludability
Including so that process, method, commodity or equipment including a series of elements include not only those elements, but also wrap
Include other elements that are not explicitly listed, or further include for this process, method, commodity or equipment intrinsic want
Element.In the absence of more restrictions, the element limited by sentence "including a ...", it is not excluded that including element
There is also other identical elements in process, method, commodity or equipment.
It will be understood by those skilled in the art that embodiments herein can be provided as method, system or computer program product.
Therefore, complete hardware embodiment, complete software embodiment or embodiment combining software and hardware aspects can be used in the application
Form.It is deposited moreover, the application can be used to can be used in the computer that one or more wherein includes computer usable program code
The shape for the computer program product implemented on storage media (including but not limited to magnetic disk storage, CD-ROM, optical memory etc.)
Formula.
It these are only embodiments herein, be not intended to limit this application.To those skilled in the art,
The application can have various modifications and variations.It is all within spirit herein and principle made by any modification, equivalent replacement,
Improve etc., it should be included within the scope of claims hereof.
Claims (11)
1. a kind of method for recommending judicial cognizance, which is characterized in that the method includes:
The goal-trail number of packages evidence for obtaining target case, to the goal-trail number of packages according to progress semantic analysis;
The standard central issue conduct with the semantic matches of the goal-trail number of packages evidence is searched from preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
First standard central issue, the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates includes standard central issue, and the standard central issue is applicable in
Reference judge's rule, the laws and regulations provision applicable with reference to judge's rule the first semantic relation and second semantic close
System, first semantic relation includes the semantic relation between the standard central issue and the rule with reference to judge, described
Second semantic relation includes the semantic relation with reference between judge's rule and the laws and regulations provision;
Using first semantic relation, it is suitable that the first standard central issue is obtained from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
The reference judge rule used, with reference to judge's rule, using second semantic relation, is known as first from the preset administration of justice
Know and obtains described first in collection of illustrative plates with reference to the applicable laws and regulations provision of judge's rule as the first laws and regulations provision.
2. according to the method described in claim 1, it is characterized in that, the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates further includes having case
Case central issue, the standard central issue belonging to the case central issue and third semantic relation, the third language
Adopted relationship includes the semantic relation between the case central issue and the standard central issue, and the method further includes:
Obtain the second standard central issue chosen from the first standard central issue;
Using the third semantic relation, the second standard central issue institute is obtained from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
Including the first case central issue.
3. according to the method described in claim 2, it is characterized in that, the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates further includes described existing
The existing case data of case, the method further include:
Obtain the second case central issue selected from the first case central issue;
The first existing case set belonging to the second case central issue is determined from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates;
Obtain the second existing case set chosen from the described first existing case set;
The existing case data of the described second existing case set are obtained from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates.
4. according to the method described in claim 2, it is characterized in that, the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates further includes described existing
The case central issue of case, the applicable case judge rule of the case central issue and the 4th semantic relation, described the
Four semantic relations include the semantic relation between the case central issue and case judge's rule, and the method is also wrapped
It includes:
Using the 4th semantic relation, it is suitable that the first case central issue is obtained from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
First case judge's rule.
5. according to the method described in claim 4, it is characterized in that, the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates further includes described existing
The existing case data of case, the method further include:
It obtains the second case selected from first case judge's rule and judges rule;
Determine that the third belonging to the second case judge rule has case set from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates;
It obtains from the third and has the 4th existing case set chosen in case set;
The existing case data of the described 4th existing case set are obtained from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates.
6. according to the method described in claim 4, it is characterized in that, the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates further includes described existing
Case judge's rule of case, reference the judge belonging to case judge's rule is regular and the 5th semantic relation, and described the
Five semantic relations include the semantic relation between the case judge rule and the rule with reference to judge, and the method is also wrapped
It includes:
Using the 5th semantic relation, the regular institute of the first case judge is obtained from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
First belonged to is with reference to judge's rule.
7. according to the method described in claim 6, it is characterized in that, the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates further includes having case
Existing case data, the case facts description of the existing case, the standard fact description belonging to case facts description,
6th semantic relation, the 6th semantic relation include the semanteme between the case facts description and standard fact description
Relationship, the method further include:
The first existing case with the semantic matches of the goal-trail number of packages evidence is searched from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
Collective data;
The 5th existing case belonging to the first existing case collective data is determined from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
Set;
The first case facts description of the described 5th existing case set is obtained from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates;
Using the 6th semantic relation, from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates obtaining first case facts describes institute
The first standard fact description belonged to.
8. the method according to the description of claim 7 is characterized in that the method further includes:
It counts each described first standard fact and describes occurred number;
Most the first standard fact description of the number occurred is obtained to describe as the second standard fact;
Export the second standard fact description.
9. the method according to the description of claim 7 is characterized in that the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates further includes the standard
The correspondence of the fact description and standard fact template, the method further include:
Obtain selected third standard fact description from the first standard fact description;
The third standard fact is obtained from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates describes corresponding standard fact template conduct
Target criteria fact template;
The case central issue of the described 5th existing case set is obtained from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates as third
Case central issue;
Obtain the 4th case central issue chosen from the third case central issue;
Using the third semantic relation, the 4th case central issue institute is obtained from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
The standard central issue of category is as third standard central issue;
Case judge's rule that the described 5th existing case set is obtained from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates is used as second
Case judge's rule;
It obtains the third case selected from second case judge's rule and judges rule;
Using the 5th semantic relation, the regular institute of third case judge is obtained from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
The reference judge rule of category is as second with reference to judge's rule;
Using second semantic relation, it is suitable with reference to judge's rule that described second is obtained from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
The laws and regulations provision used is as the second laws and regulations provision;
Using the target criteria fact template, the third standard central issue, the 4th case central issue, described
Three cases judge's rule, described second generates judgement document with reference to judge's rule and the second laws and regulations provision.
10. according to the method described in claim 9, it is characterized in that, further including the administration of justice in the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates
The correspondence of knowledge and the keyword of the judicial cognizance, the judicial cognizance includes the standard central issue, the reference
Judge's rule, the laws and regulations provision, in standard fact description and the standard fact template any one or
A variety of, the method further includes:
Obtain keyword;
According to the keyword the corresponding judicial cognizance of the keyword is searched from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates.
11. a kind of device for recommending judicial cognizance, which is characterized in that described device includes:
Semantic analysis unit, the goal-trail number of packages evidence for obtaining target case divide the goal-trail number of packages according to semanteme is carried out
Analysis;
First searching unit, for being searched from preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates and the semantic matches of the goal-trail number of packages evidence
For standard central issue as the first standard central issue, the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates includes standard central issue, described
The applicable reference judge's rule of standard central issue, the applicable laws and regulations provision of the reference judge rule, the first semantic pass
System and the second semantic relation, first semantic relation include that the standard central issue judges rule with the reference
Between semantic relation, second semantic relation includes the semanteme with reference between judge's rule and the laws and regulations provision
Relationship;
First acquisition unit, for utilizing first semantic relation, from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates described in acquisition
Applicable reference the judge rule of first standard central issue is regular with reference to judge as first, using second semantic relation,
Described first is obtained from the preset judicial cognizance collection of illustrative plates with reference to the applicable laws and regulations provision of judge's rule as first
Laws and regulations provision.
Priority Applications (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201710221357.6A CN108694178B (en) | 2017-04-06 | 2017-04-06 | Method and device for recommending judicial knowledge |
PCT/CN2018/076617 WO2018184427A1 (en) | 2017-04-06 | 2018-02-13 | Method and apparatus for recommending judicial knowledge |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201710221357.6A CN108694178B (en) | 2017-04-06 | 2017-04-06 | Method and device for recommending judicial knowledge |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN108694178A true CN108694178A (en) | 2018-10-23 |
CN108694178B CN108694178B (en) | 2020-11-27 |
Family
ID=63713031
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN201710221357.6A Active CN108694178B (en) | 2017-04-06 | 2017-04-06 | Method and device for recommending judicial knowledge |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN108694178B (en) |
WO (1) | WO2018184427A1 (en) |
Cited By (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN110232447A (en) * | 2019-04-28 | 2019-09-13 | 杭州实在智能科技有限公司 | Legal case depth reasoning method |
CN110362592A (en) * | 2019-06-17 | 2019-10-22 | 平安科技(深圳)有限公司 | Ruling director information method for pushing, device, computer equipment and storage medium |
CN110597999A (en) * | 2019-08-01 | 2019-12-20 | 湖北工业大学 | Judicial case knowledge graph construction method of dependency syntactic analysis relation extraction model |
CN110795566A (en) * | 2019-09-18 | 2020-02-14 | 平安科技(深圳)有限公司 | Case recommendation method, device and equipment and computer-readable storage medium |
CN111507095A (en) * | 2019-01-29 | 2020-08-07 | 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 | Method and device for generating referee document, storage medium and processor |
CN111985236A (en) * | 2020-06-02 | 2020-11-24 | 中国航天科工集团第二研究院 | Visual analysis method based on multi-dimensional linkage |
CN112395409A (en) * | 2020-11-30 | 2021-02-23 | 重庆工程职业技术学院 | Legal knowledge retrieval system and method |
Families Citing this family (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN112463925A (en) * | 2020-12-01 | 2021-03-09 | 科大讯飞股份有限公司 | Case file processing method, related device and readable storage medium |
Citations (10)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN101853449A (en) * | 2010-06-18 | 2010-10-06 | 上海百事通信息技术有限公司 | Legal question intelligent diagnosis method and system |
US20110173052A1 (en) * | 2010-01-12 | 2011-07-14 | Bank Of America Corporation | Enhanced Knowledge Management |
CN104240164A (en) * | 2014-09-29 | 2014-12-24 | 南京提坦信息科技有限公司 | Legal consulting method and legal consulting system based on big data analysis |
CN105183802A (en) * | 2015-08-21 | 2015-12-23 | 内蒙古民族大学 | Intelligent law knowledge base and query system thereof for legal consultation service |
US20160125462A1 (en) * | 2014-10-31 | 2016-05-05 | Informite Inc. | Systems and methods for semantic keyword analysis for paid search |
CN105976109A (en) * | 2016-05-05 | 2016-09-28 | 云神科技投资股份有限公司 | Intelligent auditing method and system based on big data |
CN106204366A (en) * | 2016-07-22 | 2016-12-07 | 三峡大学 | A kind of big data management system of law based on fuzzy reasoning |
CN106502996A (en) * | 2016-12-13 | 2017-03-15 | 深圳爱拼信息科技有限公司 | A kind of judgement document's search method and server based on semantic matches |
CN106503035A (en) * | 2016-09-14 | 2017-03-15 | 海信集团有限公司 | A kind of data processing method of knowledge mapping and device |
CN106503239A (en) * | 2016-11-07 | 2017-03-15 | 上海智臻智能网络科技股份有限公司 | A kind of method and apparatus of legal information inquiry |
Family Cites Families (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CA2624865C (en) * | 2005-10-04 | 2016-09-20 | Thomson Global Resources | Systems, methods, and software for identifying relevant legal documents |
CN101763373A (en) * | 2008-12-08 | 2010-06-30 | 新奥特硅谷视频技术有限责任公司 | Method and device for correlation retrieval |
CN105677727A (en) * | 2015-12-29 | 2016-06-15 | 上海律巢网络科技有限公司 | Data search and search results presenting method and system |
CN105930470B (en) * | 2016-04-25 | 2019-03-26 | 安徽富驰信息技术有限公司 | A kind of document retrieval method based on feature weight analytical technology |
-
2017
- 2017-04-06 CN CN201710221357.6A patent/CN108694178B/en active Active
-
2018
- 2018-02-13 WO PCT/CN2018/076617 patent/WO2018184427A1/en active Application Filing
Patent Citations (10)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20110173052A1 (en) * | 2010-01-12 | 2011-07-14 | Bank Of America Corporation | Enhanced Knowledge Management |
CN101853449A (en) * | 2010-06-18 | 2010-10-06 | 上海百事通信息技术有限公司 | Legal question intelligent diagnosis method and system |
CN104240164A (en) * | 2014-09-29 | 2014-12-24 | 南京提坦信息科技有限公司 | Legal consulting method and legal consulting system based on big data analysis |
US20160125462A1 (en) * | 2014-10-31 | 2016-05-05 | Informite Inc. | Systems and methods for semantic keyword analysis for paid search |
CN105183802A (en) * | 2015-08-21 | 2015-12-23 | 内蒙古民族大学 | Intelligent law knowledge base and query system thereof for legal consultation service |
CN105976109A (en) * | 2016-05-05 | 2016-09-28 | 云神科技投资股份有限公司 | Intelligent auditing method and system based on big data |
CN106204366A (en) * | 2016-07-22 | 2016-12-07 | 三峡大学 | A kind of big data management system of law based on fuzzy reasoning |
CN106503035A (en) * | 2016-09-14 | 2017-03-15 | 海信集团有限公司 | A kind of data processing method of knowledge mapping and device |
CN106503239A (en) * | 2016-11-07 | 2017-03-15 | 上海智臻智能网络科技股份有限公司 | A kind of method and apparatus of legal information inquiry |
CN106502996A (en) * | 2016-12-13 | 2017-03-15 | 深圳爱拼信息科技有限公司 | A kind of judgement document's search method and server based on semantic matches |
Non-Patent Citations (2)
Title |
---|
HARRINGTON H. JAMES;VOEHL FRANK: "《Management Handbooks for Results》", 18 November 2011 * |
王云才 等: "基于知识图谱的国际刑事司法研究可视化分析", 《上海公安高等专科学校学报》 * |
Cited By (10)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN111507095A (en) * | 2019-01-29 | 2020-08-07 | 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 | Method and device for generating referee document, storage medium and processor |
CN111507095B (en) * | 2019-01-29 | 2023-05-02 | 阿里云计算有限公司 | Method and device for generating referee document, storage medium and processor |
CN110232447A (en) * | 2019-04-28 | 2019-09-13 | 杭州实在智能科技有限公司 | Legal case depth reasoning method |
CN110362592A (en) * | 2019-06-17 | 2019-10-22 | 平安科技(深圳)有限公司 | Ruling director information method for pushing, device, computer equipment and storage medium |
CN110362592B (en) * | 2019-06-17 | 2023-06-23 | 平安科技(深圳)有限公司 | Method, device, computer equipment and storage medium for pushing arbitration guide information |
CN110597999A (en) * | 2019-08-01 | 2019-12-20 | 湖北工业大学 | Judicial case knowledge graph construction method of dependency syntactic analysis relation extraction model |
CN110795566A (en) * | 2019-09-18 | 2020-02-14 | 平安科技(深圳)有限公司 | Case recommendation method, device and equipment and computer-readable storage medium |
WO2021051865A1 (en) * | 2019-09-18 | 2021-03-25 | 平安科技(深圳)有限公司 | Case recommendation method and device, apparatus, and computer readable storage medium |
CN111985236A (en) * | 2020-06-02 | 2020-11-24 | 中国航天科工集团第二研究院 | Visual analysis method based on multi-dimensional linkage |
CN112395409A (en) * | 2020-11-30 | 2021-02-23 | 重庆工程职业技术学院 | Legal knowledge retrieval system and method |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
WO2018184427A1 (en) | 2018-10-11 |
CN108694178B (en) | 2020-11-27 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN108694178A (en) | A kind of method and device for recommending judicial cognizance | |
US9898526B2 (en) | Computer-implemented system and method for inclusion-based electronically stored information item cluster visual representation | |
CN105893533A (en) | Text matching method and device | |
CN108920654A (en) | A kind of matched method and apparatus of question and answer text semantic | |
CN104392006B (en) | A kind of event query processing method and processing device | |
CN108241621A (en) | The search method and device of legal knowledge | |
WO2021146388A1 (en) | Systems and methods for providing answers to a query | |
KR20120052636A (en) | A hscode recommendation service system and method using ontology | |
WO2019182828A1 (en) | Ranking and presenting search engine results based on category-specific ranking models | |
CN106598949B (en) | A kind of determination method and device of word to text contribution degree | |
CN104462399B (en) | The processing method and processing device of search result | |
CN108694183A (en) | A kind of search method and device | |
CN110175184A (en) | A kind of lower drill method, system and the electronic equipment of data dimension | |
Alonso et al. | A reactive GRASP algorithm for the container loading problem with load-bearing constraints | |
WO2022262752A1 (en) | Information recommendation method and apparatus based on data interaction, and device and storage medium | |
Moya et al. | Integrating web feed opinions into a corporate data warehouse | |
CN107291719A (en) | A kind of data retrieval method and device, a kind of date storage method and device | |
CN108776678A (en) | Index creation method and device based on mobile terminal NoSQL databases | |
CN109472017A (en) | Obtain the method and device that judgement document the court to be generated thinks section relevant information | |
CN110389932A (en) | Electric power automatic document classifying method and device | |
CN110032721A (en) | A kind of judgement document's method for pushing and device | |
CN109117434A (en) | Judgement document's search method, device, storage medium and processor | |
Joshi et al. | Image retrieval system using intuitive descriptors | |
WO2022262775A1 (en) | Information processing method and apparatus based on data exchange, and device and storage medium | |
CN112559677A (en) | Retrieval method of laws and regulations and related device |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PB01 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
CB02 | Change of applicant information | ||
CB02 | Change of applicant information |
Address after: 100080 No. 401, 4th Floor, Haitai Building, 229 North Fourth Ring Road, Haidian District, Beijing Applicant after: Beijing Guoshuang Technology Co.,Ltd. Address before: 100086 Cuigong Hotel, 76 Zhichun Road, Shuangyushu District, Haidian District, Beijing Applicant before: Beijing Guoshuang Technology Co.,Ltd. |
|
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
GR01 | Patent grant |