CN108492002B

CN108492002B - Inter-dispatching method and system for invigilators among multiple examination institutions

Info

Publication number: CN108492002B
Application number: CN201810150220.0A
Authority: CN
Inventors: 陈瀚; 李裕伦
Original assignee: Wuhan Tianliang Data Technology Co ltd
Current assignee: Wuhan Tianliang Data Technology Co ltd
Priority date: 2018-02-13
Filing date: 2018-02-13
Publication date: 2021-10-22
Anticipated expiration: 2038-02-13
Also published as: CN108492002A

Abstract

The invention relates to a mutual dispatching method and a mutual dispatching system for invigilators among multiple examination mechanisms, which are characterized in that examination rooms of all examination mechanisms are sequentially selected as current dispatching mechanisms from large to small, the examination mechanism closest to the dispatching mechanism is found as a current receiving mechanism in the dispatching process, namely, the optimal matching of the number of people is realized, and in addition, when the current receiving mechanism is selected, the current receiving mechanism can be flexibly selected by combining multiple preset dispatching rules. The invention can minimize the number of receiving mechanisms dispatched by the dispatching mechanism and flexibly meet the invigilation management requirement of multi-mechanism joint examination.

Description

Inter-dispatching method and system for invigilators among multiple examination institutions

Technical Field

The invention relates to the technical field of inter-organization personnel inter-dispatching compilation, in particular to an inter-dispatching method and system for invigilators among multiple examination organizations.

Background

In the multi-institution joint examination management work, invigilators need to be mutually allocated among the institutions according to the number of examination rooms of the institutions and the mutual allocation rule. For example, a teacher is dispatched from a primary satellite school to a primary space school invigilation, and then a teacher is dispatched from a primary space school to a primary satellite school invigilation. The mutual dispatching rules can be adapted to various management requirements, such as requirements that some organizations must dispatch each other, some organizations cannot dispatch each other, whether two organizations can dispatch back and forth, and the like. In the prior art, the mutual dispatching scheme of invigilators among organizations is generally manually compiled. And a few methods can realize the scheme of mutually dispatching the invigilators among multiple organizations by a computer automatically, but cannot support various mutually dispatching rules and cannot adapt to the management requirements of mutually dispatching various invigilators.

Disclosure of Invention

The invention aims to solve the technical problem of providing a mutual dispatching method and a mutual dispatching system for invigilators among multiple examination institutions, aiming at the defects of the prior art.

The technical scheme for solving the technical problems is as follows: a mutual dispatching method for invigilators among multiple examination institutions comprises the following steps:

step 1, obtaining mechanism information of each examination mechanism participating in mutual dispatching in an examination, wherein the mechanism information comprises: the unique identification of the examination organization, the number of the examination rooms and the parameters of whether the bidirectional dispatching is supported or not are initialized, and the number of the dispatchable people and the number of the receivable people of each examination organization are respectively the number of the examination rooms corresponding to the number of the dispatchable people and the number of the receivable people of each examination organization;

step 2, sorting the unique mechanism identifications according to the sequence of the number of the dispatchable people from large to small to obtain a dispatching sequence, and determining the unique mechanism identification of the first mechanism in the dispatching sequence as the current dispatching mechanism;

step 3, respectively calculating the absolute value of the difference value between the number of the persons capable of being dispatched by the current dispatching mechanism and the number of the persons capable of being received by other examination mechanisms with the number of the persons not being 0;

step 4, according to the sequence of the absolute values from small to large, sequentially according to the assigned information and the parameters of the current dispatching mechanism, determining a current receiving mechanism corresponding to the current dispatching mechanism;

step 5, determining the smaller value of the number of the dispatchable people of the current dispatching mechanism and the number of the receivable people of the current receiving mechanism, and taking the smaller value as the number of the current dispatching people of the current dispatching mechanism to the current receiving mechanism and storing the smaller value;

step 6, calculating a new dispatchable number of the current dispatching mechanism and a new receivable number of the current receiving mechanism, wherein the new dispatchable number of the current dispatching mechanism is the dispatchable number of the current dispatching mechanism-the current dispatching number; the new receivable number of the current receiving mechanism is the receivable number of the current receiving mechanism-the current dispatching number of people;

step 7, judging whether the number of the new dispatchable persons is zero, if so, determining that the unique mechanism identifier next to the unique mechanism identifier is a new current dispatching mechanism according to the dispatching sequence, and executing the step 3 until the unique mechanism identifier last in the dispatching sequence participates in dispatching, so as to obtain and store a mutual dispatching scheme of invigilators among the multiple examination mechanisms of the examination of one time; if not, executing the step 3.

The invention has the beneficial effects that: the invention ensures that the receiving mechanisms dispatched by the dispatching mechanism have the least quantity through the optimal matching of the number of people. In the method, before the inter-organization personnel dispatching, the organizations participating in the dispatching are firstly sequenced according to the number of the examination rooms from large to small, and the organizations with large number of the examination rooms are dispatched in advance. In the dispatching process, the mechanism closest to the number of people of the dispatching mechanism is found as a receiving mechanism, and the optimal matching of the number of people is realized. This minimizes the number of receiving mechanisms to which the dispatching mechanism is dispatched. The method can flexibly dispatch each other according to whether the examination mechanism supports bidirectional dispatching, and simultaneously, the quantity of receiving mechanisms dispatched by the dispatching mechanism is minimum, so that the invigilation management requirement of multi-mechanism joint examination is more flexibly met.

On the basis of the technical scheme, the invention can be further improved as follows:

further, the step 4 comprises:

step 4.1, judging whether the current dispatching mechanism supports bidirectional dispatching or not according to the parameters of the current dispatching mechanism;

step 4.2, if yes, taking the examination mechanism corresponding to the minimum absolute value in the absolute values as a current receiving mechanism, and executing step 5;

4.3, if not, sequentially judging whether the examination mechanism has already dispatched an invigilator to the current dispatching mechanism or not according to the dispatched information of the examination mechanisms corresponding to the absolute values in the sequence from small to large of the absolute values, determining the examination mechanism as a current receiving mechanism when judging that the examination mechanism has not dispatched the invigilator to the current dispatching mechanism, and executing the step 5;

wherein, when there is an absolute value of the same magnitude among the absolute values, any one of the absolute values of the same magnitude is randomly selected.

The invention has the further beneficial effects that: the invention can generate different invigilating and mutual dispatching schemes. In the invention, aiming at one examination, when a plurality of mechanisms can meet the condition of the current receiving mechanism, one mechanism can be randomly selected as the current receiving mechanism. Under the condition that the information of the examination institutions is not changed and the mutual dispatching rule is not changed, the mutual dispatching among the institutions is carried out by using the method again, and different invigilation mutual dispatching schemes can be generated by the method. Therefore, aiming at the same examination, the method can generate a plurality of different invigilating mutual dispatching schemes.

Further, the step 1 further comprises: acquiring the number of invigilates in each examination room of the examination;

the method further comprises:

and 8, multiplying the number of dispatchable persons, the number of receivable persons and the number of dispatched persons in the mutual dispatching scheme of the invigilators among the multiple examination mechanisms by the number of invigilators to obtain a new mutual dispatching scheme of the invigilators among the multiple examination mechanisms.

The invention has the further beneficial effects that: the number of invigilators among examination institutions is distributed according to the number of examination rooms to generate a distribution scheme among the institutions, and the final number of the invigilators is generated according to the number of the examinees in each examination room, so that the number of the invigilators in each examination room is not limited by the number of the examinees in each examination room, and the invigilators are more flexible and convenient to distribute.

Further, before the step 2, the method further includes:

step 9, setting a white list and/or a black list, wherein the white list comprises at least two examination mechanisms, and proctor is dispatched among the examination mechanisms and cannot be dispatched with other examination mechanisms except the white list; the blacklist comprises at least two mechanisms, wherein invigilators can not be dispatched among the examination mechanisms, and the invigilators can only be dispatched with other examination mechanisms except the blacklist;

when only the white list is set, the method sequentially comprises the following steps: the step 1, the step 9, to the examination institutions in the white list, the step 2 to the step 7 are executed to obtain a first assignment scheme, to the examination institutions other than the white list, the step 2 to the step 7 are executed to obtain a second assignment scheme, and the step 10, wherein the step 10 is: combining the first assignment scheme and the second assignment scheme to form a mutual assignment scheme of invigilators among multiple examination mechanisms of the examination and storing the mutual assignment scheme; alternatively, the first and second electrodes may be,

when only the black list is set, the step 3 includes:

step 3.1, judging whether the current dispatching mechanism is in the blacklist or not according to the blacklist;

3.2, if yes, respectively calculating the absolute value of the difference value of the number of the dispatchable persons of the current dispatching mechanism and the number of receivable persons of each examination mechanism, of which the number of receivable persons is not 0, of other examination mechanisms except the blacklist where the current dispatching mechanism is located;

3.3, if not, respectively calculating the absolute value of the difference value between the number of dispatchable people of the current dispatching mechanism and the number of receivable people of each test mechanism with the number of receivable people not equal to 0; alternatively, the first and second electrodes may be,

when a white list and a black list are simultaneously set, the method sequentially comprises the following steps: in step 1, in step 9, the steps 2 to 7 are performed on each examination mechanism in the white list to obtain a first assignment scheme, the steps 2 to 7 are performed on each examination mechanism outside the white list to obtain a second assignment scheme, and step 10, where the step 10 is: combining the first assignment scheme and the second assignment scheme to form a mutual assignment scheme of invigilators among multiple examination mechanisms of the examination and storing the mutual assignment scheme; wherein the content of the first and second substances,

when the steps 2 to 7 are executed for each examination institution other than the white list, the step 3 includes:

step 3.4, judging whether the current dispatching mechanism is in the blacklist or not according to the blacklist;

step 3.5, if yes, respectively calculating the absolute value of the difference value of the number of the persons capable of being dispatched by the current dispatching mechanism and the number of the persons capable of being received by the examination mechanisms, other than the blacklist and the white list, of which the number of the persons capable of being received is not 0;

and 3.6, if not, respectively calculating the absolute value of the difference between the number of the persons capable of being dispatched by the current dispatching mechanism and the number of the persons capable of being received by the examination mechanisms of which the number of the persons capable of being received is not 0 except the white list.

Further, the number of the white list and/or the black list is at least one;

and when a plurality of white lists exist, executing the step 2 to the step 7 on the plurality of white lists respectively to obtain a plurality of first assignment schemes.

The invention has the further beneficial effects that: the invention supports setting of various mutual dispatching rules such as the number of invigilates in each examination room, whether the invigilates bidirectionally, the organization blacklist, the organization whitelist and the like, and the rules can be flexibly selected according to the needs of users, thereby being suitable for various mutual dispatching management requirements of invigilates.

The invention also provides a generation system of the invigilator distribution scheme, which comprises the following steps:

the basic information determining unit is used for acquiring mechanism information of each examination mechanism participating in mutual dispatching in an examination, and the mechanism information comprises: the unique identification of the examination organization, the number of the examination rooms and the parameters of whether the bidirectional dispatching is supported or not are initialized, and the number of the dispatchable people and the number of the receivable people of each examination organization are respectively the number of the examination rooms corresponding to the number of the dispatchable people and the number of the receivable people of each examination organization;

the first current dispatching mechanism determining unit is used for sequencing the mechanism unique identifiers according to the sequence of the dispatchable people number determined by the basic information determining unit from large to small to obtain a dispatching sequence, and determining a first mechanism unique identifier in the dispatching sequence as a current dispatching mechanism;

a first calculation unit configured to calculate an absolute value of a difference between the number of persons that can be dispatched at the current dispatching mechanism and the number of persons that can be accepted at each of the other examination mechanisms having the number of persons other than 0, the number of persons being able to be accepted at the current dispatching mechanism being determined by the first current dispatching mechanism determination unit or the second current dispatching mechanism determination unit, respectively;

a current receiving mechanism determining unit, configured to determine, according to a descending order of the absolute value calculated by the first calculating unit, a current receiving mechanism corresponding to the current dispatching mechanism according to the stored assigned information and the parameter of the current dispatching mechanism determined by the basic information determining unit in sequence;

a dispatch person number determining unit, configured to determine a smaller value between the number of dispatchable persons of the current dispatching mechanism and the number of receivable persons of the current receiving mechanism determined by the current receiving mechanism determining unit, and store the smaller value as the current number of dispatches of the current dispatching mechanism to the current receiving mechanism;

a second calculation unit configured to calculate a new dispatchable number of persons of the current dispatching mechanism determined by the first current dispatching mechanism determining unit or the second current dispatching mechanism determining unit and a new receivable number of persons of the current receiving mechanism determined by the current receiving mechanism determining unit, where the new dispatchable number of persons of the current dispatching mechanism is the dispatchable number of persons of the current dispatching mechanism — the current dispatching number of persons; the new receivable number of the current receiving mechanism is the receivable number of the current receiving mechanism-the current dispatching number of people;

a second current dispatching mechanism determining unit, configured to determine whether the new number of dispatchable people calculated by the second calculating unit is zero, if so, determine, according to the dispatching order determined by the first current dispatching mechanism determining unit, that a next mechanism unique identifier of the mechanism unique identifier is a new current dispatching mechanism, and send a calculation instruction to the first calculating unit until a last mechanism unique identifier in the dispatching order participates in dispatching, so as to obtain a mutual dispatching scheme of proctor among multiple examination mechanisms of the primary examination; and if not, sending a calculation instruction to the first calculation unit.

The invention has the beneficial effects that: the invention adopts the current receiving mechanism determining unit to carry out optimal matching of the number of people, so that the number of receiving mechanisms dispatched by the dispatching mechanism is minimum. In the method, before the inter-organization personnel dispatching, the organizations participating in the dispatching are firstly sequenced according to the number of the examination rooms from large to small, and the organizations with large number of the examination rooms are dispatched in advance. In the dispatching process, the mechanism closest to the number of people of the dispatching mechanism is found as a receiving mechanism, and the optimal matching of the number of people is realized. This minimizes the number of receiving mechanisms to which the dispatching mechanism is dispatched. The method can flexibly dispatch each other according to whether the examination mechanism supports bidirectional dispatching, and simultaneously, the quantity of receiving mechanisms dispatched by the dispatching mechanism is minimum, so that the invigilation management requirement of multi-mechanism joint examination is more flexibly met.

Further, the current receiving mechanism determining unit is specifically configured to:

judging whether the current dispatching mechanism supports bidirectional dispatching or not according to the parameters of the current dispatching mechanism determined by the basic information determining unit; if so, taking the examination mechanism corresponding to the minimum absolute value in the absolute values calculated by the first calculation unit as the current receiving mechanism; if not, according to the sequence of the absolute values from small to large, sequentially according to the stored assigned information of the examination mechanism corresponding to each absolute value, judging whether the examination mechanism has already sent the invigilator to the current dispatching mechanism, and when judging that the examination mechanism has not sent the invigilator to the current dispatching mechanism, determining the examination mechanism as the current receiving mechanism, wherein when the absolute values with the same size exist, any one of the absolute values with the same size is randomly selected.

Further, the basic information determination unit is further configured to: acquiring the number of invigilates in each examination room of the examination;

the system further comprises:

and the mutual dispatching scheme determining unit is used for multiplying each number of dispatchable persons, the number of receivable persons and the number of dispatched persons in the saved mutual dispatching scheme of the invigilators among the multiple examination mechanisms by the number of invigilators to obtain a new mutual dispatching scheme of the invigilators among the multiple examination mechanisms.

Further, the system further comprises:

the system comprises a setting unit and a processing unit, wherein the setting unit is used for setting a white list and/or a black list, the white list comprises at least two examination mechanisms, and invigilators can be dispatched among the examination mechanisms and cannot be dispatched with other examination mechanisms except the white list; the blacklist comprises at least two mechanisms, wherein invigilators can not be dispatched among the examination mechanisms, and the invigilators can only be dispatched with other examination mechanisms except the blacklist;

when only the blacklist is set, the first calculation unit is specifically configured to:

judging whether the current dispatching mechanism is in the blacklist or not according to the blacklist; if yes, respectively calculating the absolute value of the difference value between the number of the persons capable of being dispatched by the current dispatching mechanism and the number of the persons capable of being received by other examination mechanisms except the blacklist where the number of the persons capable of being received is not 0; if not, respectively calculating the absolute value of the difference value between the number of the persons capable of being dispatched by the current dispatching mechanism and the number of the persons capable of being received by other examination mechanisms with the number of the persons not being received by 0; alternatively, the first and second electrodes may be,

when a white list and a black list are set simultaneously, the first computing unit is specifically configured to:

judging whether the current dispatching mechanism is in the blacklist or not according to the blacklist; if yes, respectively calculating the absolute value of the difference value of the number of the receivable persons of each examination mechanism, of which the number of the persons capable of being dispatched by the current dispatching mechanism is not 0, of the number of the persons capable of being accepted by the examination mechanisms except the blacklist and the white list; if not, the absolute value of the difference between the number of the persons capable of being dispatched by the current dispatching mechanism and the number of the persons capable of being received by the examination mechanisms except the white list, wherein the number of the persons capable of being received is not 0, is respectively calculated.

Furthermore, the number of the white list and/or the black list is at least one.

Drawings

Fig. 1 is a block flow diagram of a method 100 for mutual assignment of proctoring persons among multiple examination facilities according to an embodiment of the present invention;

fig. 2 is a block flow diagram of step 140 of a method 100 for mutual assignment of proctoring persons between multiple testing institutions according to another embodiment of the present invention;

fig. 3 is a block flow diagram of a method 100 for mutual assignment of proctoring persons between multiple testing institutions according to another embodiment of the present invention;

fig. 4 is a block flow diagram of a method 100 for mutual assignment of proctoring persons between multiple testing facilities according to another embodiment of the present invention;

fig. 5 is a block flow diagram of step 130 of a method 100 for mutual assignment of proctoring persons between multiple testing institutions according to another embodiment of the present invention;

fig. 6 is a block flow diagram of step 130 of a method 100 for mutual assignment of proctoring persons between multiple testing institutions according to another embodiment of the present invention;

fig. 7 is a schematic block diagram of a mutual invigilator dispatch system 200 among multiple examination facilities according to an embodiment of the present invention;

fig. 8 is a schematic block diagram of a mutual invigilation system 200 for proctoriers between multiple examination facilities according to another embodiment of the present invention;

fig. 9 is a schematic block diagram of a mutual invigilation system 200 for proctoriers between multiple examination facilities according to another embodiment of the present invention.

Detailed Description

The principles and features of this invention are described below in conjunction with the following drawings, which are set forth by way of illustration only and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention.

Example one

A method 100 for mutual assignment of proctoring persons between multiple testing facilities, as shown in fig. 1, comprises:

step 110, obtaining mechanism information of each examination mechanism participating in mutual dispatching in one examination, wherein the mechanism information comprises: the unique identification of the examination organization, the number of the examination rooms and the parameters of whether the bidirectional dispatching is supported or not are initialized, and the number of the dispatchable people and the number of the receivable people of each examination organization are respectively the number of the examination rooms corresponding to the number of the dispatchable people and the number of the receivable people.

And 120, sequencing the unique mechanism identifications according to the sequence of the number of the dispatchable people from large to small to obtain a dispatching sequence, and determining the first unique mechanism identification in the dispatching sequence as the current dispatching mechanism.

In step 130, the absolute value of the difference between the number of persons able to be dispatched by the current dispatching means and the number of persons able to be received by each testing means having the number of persons able to be received other than 0 is calculated.

And step 140, determining the current receiving mechanism corresponding to the current dispatching mechanism according to the saved dispatched information and the parameters of the current dispatching mechanism in sequence from small to large absolute values.

And 150, determining the smaller value of the number of persons capable of being dispatched by the current dispatching mechanism and the number of persons capable of being received by the current receiving mechanism as the number of persons dispatched to the current receiving mechanism by the current dispatching mechanism and storing the smaller value.

Step 160, calculating a new dispatchable number of the current dispatching mechanism and a new receivable number of the current receiving mechanism, wherein the new dispatchable number of the current dispatching mechanism is equal to the dispatchable number of the current dispatching mechanism-the current dispatching number; the new receivable number of people of the current receiving mechanism is equal to the receivable number of people of the current receiving mechanism-the current dispatching number of people.

Step 170, judging whether the number of new dispatchable persons is zero, if so, determining that the unique mechanism identifier next to the unique mechanism identifier is a new current dispatching mechanism according to the dispatching sequence, and executing step 130 until the unique mechanism identifier last in the dispatching sequence participates in dispatching, so as to obtain a mutual dispatching scheme of invigilators among multiple examination mechanisms of one examination and store the scheme; if not, go to step 130.

It should be noted that the institution unique identifier may be the name of the examination institution or the institution I D.

Any distribution data can be stored in the mutual dispatch data storage unit, and the mutual dispatch data storage unit at least comprises three information of a dispatching mechanism, a receiving mechanism and a number of dispatched persons, wherein the data type of the number of dispatched persons is a positive integer.

In step 130, the absolute value of the difference between the number of persons that can be dispatched in the current dispatching means and the number of persons that can be received in each examination means having the number of persons other than 0 is calculated, and if the number of persons that can be received in the other means is zero, indicating that no more persons can be received, the current dispatching means cannot be designated as the current receiving means.

The parameter of whether bi-dispatching is supported or not acquired in step 110 can be represented by an unambiguous identifier, for example, the character "1" can be used to represent bi-dispatching and "0" can be used to represent non-bi-dispatching.

In this embodiment, before inter-organization staff dispatching, the organizations participating in the inter-dispatching are firstly sequenced from large to small in the number of the examination rooms, and the organizations with a large number of the examination rooms are dispatched first. In the dispatching process, the mechanism closest to the number of people of the dispatching mechanism is found as a receiving mechanism, and the optimal matching of the number of people is realized. This minimizes the number of receiving mechanisms to which the dispatching mechanism is dispatched. Therefore, the present embodiment can minimize the number of entries of the allocation scheme and achieve a higher success rate of the staff assignment.

According to the method, the number of people is optimally matched among the computing mechanisms, the sending mechanism and the receiving mechanism are determined, and the mutual sending scheme of the invigilators is compiled.

Preferably, as shown in fig. 2, step 140 includes:

step 141, according to the parameters of the current dispatching mechanism, it is determined whether the current dispatching mechanism supports bidirectional dispatching.

And 142, if so, taking the examination mechanism corresponding to the minimum absolute value in the absolute values as the current receiving mechanism, and executing the step 150.

Step 143, if not, according to the sequence of the absolute values from small to large, sequentially according to the assigned information of the examination mechanism corresponding to each absolute value, judging whether the examination mechanism has already assigned the invigilator to the current assigning mechanism, when judging that the examination mechanism has not assigned the invigilator to the current assigning mechanism, determining the examination mechanism as the current receiving mechanism, and executing step 150,

The embodiment can generate different invigilating mutual dispatching schemes. In the traditional method, only one scheme of mutually dispatching invigilators can be generated for one examination, and in the embodiment, one mechanism can be randomly selected as the current receiving mechanism for one examination when a plurality of mechanisms can meet the conditions of the current receiving mechanism. Under the condition that the information of the examination institutions is not changed and the mutual dispatching rule is not changed, the mutual dispatching among the institutions is carried out by using the method again, and different invigilation mutual dispatching schemes can be generated by the method. Therefore, aiming at the same examination, the method can generate a plurality of different invigilating mutual dispatching schemes.

Preferably, as shown in fig. 3, step 110 further includes: the number of invigilates in each examination room of one examination is obtained.

The method 100 further comprises:

and step 180, multiplying each number of dispatchable persons, receivable persons and the number of dispatched persons in the mutual dispatching scheme of the invigilators among the multiple examination mechanisms by the number of invigilators to obtain a new mutual dispatching scheme of the invigilators among the multiple examination mechanisms.

The number of examiners N per examination room can be set. For example, N-2 means that two examiners are needed for each examination room.

Preferably, before step 120, the method 100 further comprises:

step 190, setting a white list and/or a black list, wherein the white list comprises at least two examination mechanisms, and proctor is dispatched among the examination mechanisms and cannot be dispatched with other examination mechanisms except the white list; the blacklist comprises at least two mechanisms, wherein the examination mechanisms cannot dispatch the invigilators mutually, and can only dispatch the invigilators mutually with other examination mechanisms except the blacklist.

When only the white list is set, as shown in fig. 4, the method 100 sequentially includes: step 110, step 190, step 11 and among the examination institutions in the dialogue list in fig. 1, step 120 to step 170 in fig. 1 are executed to obtain a first assignment scheme, step 12 and among the examination institutions except the dialogue list, step 120 to step 170 in fig. 1 are executed to obtain a second assignment scheme, and step 1100, the first assignment scheme and the second assignment scheme are combined to form a mutual assignment scheme of the invigilators among the examination institutions of one examination and are stored. Alternatively, the first and second electrodes may be,

when only the black list is set, as shown in fig. 5, step 130 includes:

and step 131, judging whether the current dispatching mechanism is in the blacklist or not according to the blacklist.

In step 132, if yes, the absolute value of the difference between the number of persons able to be dispatched by the current dispatching mechanism and the number of persons able to be received by each examination mechanism other than the blacklist where the current dispatching mechanism is located and the number of persons able to be received by the examination mechanism other than 0 is calculated.

If not, step 133 calculates the absolute value of the difference between the number of persons able to be dispatched by the current dispatching means and the number of persons able to be received by the other examination means whose number of persons able to be received is not 0. Alternatively, the first and second electrodes may be,

when setting a white list and a black list simultaneously, as shown in fig. 4, the method 100 sequentially includes: step 110, step 190, step 11, checking each examination mechanism in the white list, executing step 120-step 170 in fig. 1 to obtain a first assignment scheme, step 12, checking other examination mechanisms except the white list, executing step 120-step 170 in fig. 1 to obtain a second assignment scheme, and step 1100, combining the first assignment scheme and the second assignment scheme to form an inter-assignment scheme of the invigilators among the multiple examination mechanisms of one examination and storing the inter-assignment scheme; wherein the content of the first and second substances,

when steps 120 to 170 are executed for each examination institution other than the white list, as shown in fig. 6, step 130 includes:

and step 134, judging whether the current dispatching mechanism is in the blacklist or not according to the blacklist.

And step 135, if yes, respectively calculating the absolute value of the difference value of the number of receivable persons of each examination mechanism, of which the number of the receivable persons is not 0, of the currently-assigned mechanism and the black list and the white list in which the currently-assigned mechanism is located.

And step 136, if not, respectively calculating the absolute value of the difference between the number of the dispatchable persons of the current dispatching mechanism and the number of the receivable persons of the examination mechanisms, other than the white list, of which the number of the receivable persons is not 0.

It should be noted that, in an examination, a plurality of white lists may be set, and one institution may only belong to one white list, and if one institution belongs to one white list, it is impossible for the institution other than the white list to participate in mutual assignment, and the institution types in the white list must be consistent, for example, the institutions are all schools and all classes, and the institution in the white list must belong to the range defined in the examination institution information. In an examination, a plurality of blacklists may be set, and an organization may belong to the plurality of blacklists, the types of organizations in the blacklists are consistent, for example, the organizations in the blacklists are all schools and all classes, and the organizations in the blacklists must belong to the range defined in the examination organization information.

Preferably, the number of white lists and/or black lists is at least one.

When there are multiple white lists, step 120 to step 170 in fig. 1 are executed for the multiple white lists respectively, so as to obtain multiple first assignment schemes.

It should be noted that neither the black list nor the white list is necessarily set, and if the setting is required according to actual needs, the number of the white list and/or the black list is at least one. Of course, the number of the white list and/or the black list may not be set according to actual needs, that is, the number of the white list and/or the black list may be 0.

The multiple inter-dispatching rules are selectable, and different management requirements of multi-organization joint examination can be met.

In the conventional method, the invigilators can be dispatched among the institutions, but only based on a certain fixed rule or no rule. And cannot adapt to various flexible personnel allocation requirements.

The method in the embodiment supports setting of mutual assignment rules such as the number of examinees in each examination room, whether the examinees are to be assigned bidirectionally, the organization blacklist and the organization whitelist, and the rules can be flexibly selected according to the needs of users, so that the method can meet the management requirements of the mutual assignment of various examinees.

For example, the examination institution is an institution taking an examination, and the type of institution may be: schools, grades, classes, enterprises, government departments, and the like. A receiving mechanism: an organization dispatched to invigilate the person is received. The number of receivable persons: the receiving organization may currently receive the amount dispatched from the other organization. A dispatching mechanism: a facility for dispatching a proctor. The number of people that can be dispatched: the dispatch agency can currently dispatch the number of proctoring personnel out. And (3) mutual dispatching: refers to dispatching invigilators among a plurality of institutions at will. For example: the schoolchild A sends out the staff to the primary school B, the primary school B sends out the staff to the primary school C, and the primary school C sends out the staff to the schoolchild A. Bidirectional dispatching: the proctor can be dispatched to and from the two facilities. For example: the first school sends the invigilator to the second school, and the second school also sends the invigilator to the first school. Wherein, bi-directional dispatching is a special form of mutual dispatching.

The number of the reference schools and the examination fields of the schools are shown in the table 1 in the text.

TABLE 1

The invigilators need to be mutually dispatched among nine schools to generate a scheme. The method comprises the following steps:

firstly, the examination invigilating and mutual dispatching rule is set.

Rule 1: the number of invigilators N in each test room is set to be 2.

Rule 2: bi-directional dispatching is supported.

Rule 3: the test includes a white list as shown in table 2 below. The white list includes three schools: primary schools, namely primary schools and primary schools, indicate that proctor must be mutually dispatched among the three primary schools and cannot be mutually dispatched with other schools.

TABLE 2

Examination mechanism
	Fifth grade school
Sixth school
	Primary school seventhly

Rule 4: the test includes a blacklist as shown in table 3 below. The black list includes two schools: the first primary school and the second primary school represent that the proctoring personnel can not be dispatched to each other between the two primary schools, but can be dispatched to each other with other non-white list organizations.

TABLE 3

Examination mechanism
	First of primary school
Second primary school

And compiling an inter-assignment scheme aiming at three schools in the white list.

Initially, the number of dispatchable people and the number of receivable people in the three schools are the number of test sites.

And sequencing the three schools according to the test field number from large to small.

Determining a current dispatching mechanism: according to the sorting result, determining that the primary school is the current dispatching mechanism.

Determining a current receiving mechanism: the absolute values of the differences between the receivable number of the primary school and the dispatchable number of the primary school are sequentially calculated as follows: 4, 6, the determination with the smallest absolute value is the current receiving mechanism, so the elementary school is determined to be the current receiving mechanism.

Determining the number of the persons to be dispatched: the number of persons to be dispatched is 10 and the number of persons to be received is 6, and according to the method, a smaller value between the two persons is selected as the number of persons to be dispatched, namely the number of persons to be dispatched is 6, which means that the fifth school dispatches 6 persons to the sixth school and the fifth school receives 6 persons from the fifth school.

Recalculate the new number of dispatchable people and the new number of receivable people of primary school:

the new number of persons can be dispatched in primary school, the number of persons dispatched this time is 10-6-4.

The receivable number of the primary school is 6-0.

Since the new dispatchable number of primary school is 4 instead of 0, the next current receiving institution is continuously determined. After calculation, primary school is found to meet the conditions of the receiving mechanism, the primary school is determined to be the current receiving mechanism, and according to the method, 4 persons are dispatched to the primary school, and 4 persons are dispatched to the primary school. Recalculating the number of dispatchable people of primary school (0), and the number of receivable people of primary school (0). Thus, the primary school completes the dispatch of all the staff.

According to the method, determining the next current dispatching mechanism as a primary school, and continuing to dispatch until the primary schools are dispatched. The result is saved to the mutual assignment data saving unit, as shown in table 4.

TABLE 4

Dispensing mechanism	Receiving mechanism	Number of persons to be dispatched
			Fifth grade school	Sixth school	6
Fifth grade school	Primary school seventhly	4
			Sixth school	Fifth grade school	6
Primary school seventhly	Fifth grade school	4

Then, the assignment schemes are compiled for six schools outside the white list.

Six schools outside the white list are to be assigned.

Initially, the number of dispatchable people and the number of receivable people in the six schools are the number of test sites. The organizations to be dispatched are sorted from large to small according to the number of the examination rooms, and the sorted organizations to be dispatched are shown in table 5.

TABLE 5

Determining a current dispatching mechanism: and determining the primary school (i) as the current dispatching mechanism according to the sequencing result.

Determining a current receiving mechanism: according to the method, because the primary school (i) and the primary school (ii) belong to the blacklist, the primary school (i) and the primary school (ii) cannot be dispatched to each other, so that the absolute values of the differences between the receivable number of people in the primary school (iii), the primary school (iv), the primary school (r) and the dispatchable number of people in the primary school (i) are calculated in sequence as follows: 2, 6, 22, 22, the determination of the smallest absolute value is the current receiving mechanism, and therefore primary school is determined to be the current receiving mechanism.

Determining the number of the persons to be dispatched: at present, the number of persons capable of being dispatched in the primary school is 24, the number of persons capable of being received in the primary school is 22, and according to the method, a smaller value between the number of persons capable of being dispatched in the primary school and the number of persons capable of being received in the primary school is selected as the number of persons to be dispatched in the current time, namely the number of persons to be dispatched in the current time is 22, which means that the primary school is dispatched to 22 in the primary school in the first department, and 22 persons are dispatched in the primary school in the first department after the primary school receives the information.

Recalculating the new number of dispatchable people of primary school and the new number of receivable people of primary school:

the new number of persons that can be dispatched in the primary school is 24-22-2.

The new receivable number of people-the number of people sent to this time-22-0.

Since the new dispatchable number of primary school is 2 instead of 0, the next current receiving institution is continuously determined. After calculation, finding that the primary schools (a) and (a) all meet the conditions of the receiving mechanism, randomly determining the primary school (b) as the current receiving mechanism, and dispatching the rest 2 people of the primary school (b) to the primary school (b). The number of persons assignable to the first primary school is recalculated to 0, and the number of persons receivable by the first primary school is recalculated to 0. Thus, the primary school completes the dispatch of all the personnel.

According to the method, the next current dispatching mechanism is determined to be a primary school, the invigilator dispatching is carried out according to the steps until all six primary schools are completed, and a mutual dispatching scheme is generated as shown in the table 6.

TABLE 6

All the mutual dispatching results are combined into a set of invigilation mutual dispatching scheme, and the number of dispatched persons is multiplied by the number N of invigilations in each examination room, namely multiplied by 2, so that the final invigilation mutual dispatching scheme is obtained, as shown in table 7.

TABLE 7

Dispensing mechanism	Receiving mechanism	Number of persons to be dispatched
			First of primary school	Primary school III	44
First of primary school	Primary school's device	4
			Second primary school	Fourth of primary school	36
Second primary school	Ninthly of primary school	4
			Primary school III	First of primary school	44
Fourth of primary school	Second primary school	36
			Primary school's device	First of primary school	4
Ninthly of primary school	Second primary school	4
			Fifth grade school	Sixth school		12
Fifth grade school	Primary school seventhly	8
			Sixth school	Fifth grade school	12
Primary school seventhly	Fifth grade school	8

Example two

A generation system 200 of the assignment scheme of the examiner, as shown in fig. 7, includes: the system comprises a basic information determining unit, a first current dispatching mechanism determining unit, a first calculating unit, a current receiving mechanism determining unit, a dispatching people number determining unit, a second calculating unit and a second current dispatching mechanism determining unit.

The basic information determining unit is used for acquiring mechanism information of each examination mechanism participating in mutual dispatching in an examination, and the mechanism information comprises: the unique identification of the examination organization, the number of the examination rooms and the parameters of whether the bidirectional dispatching is supported or not are initialized, and the number of the dispatchable people and the number of the receivable people of each examination organization are respectively the number of the examination rooms corresponding to the number of the dispatchable people and the number of the receivable people.

And the first current dispatching mechanism determining unit is used for sequencing the unique mechanism identifications according to the sequence of the dispatchable people number from large to small determined by the basic information determining unit to obtain the dispatching sequence, and determining the first unique mechanism identification in the dispatching sequence as the current dispatching mechanism.

And a first calculating unit for calculating the absolute value of the difference between the number of persons that can be dispatched by the current dispatching mechanism determined by the first current dispatching mechanism determining unit or the second current dispatching mechanism determining unit and the number of persons that can be received by other examination mechanisms with the number of persons that can be received being not 0.

And the current receiving mechanism determining unit is used for determining the current receiving mechanism corresponding to the current dispatching mechanism according to the sequence from small to large of the absolute value calculated by the first calculating unit and the stored dispatched information and the parameters of the current dispatching mechanism determined by the basic information determining unit.

And the dispatching person number determining unit is used for determining the smaller value of the number of persons capable of being dispatched from the current dispatching mechanism and the number of persons capable of being received by the current receiving mechanism determined by the current receiving mechanism determining unit, and the smaller value is used as the number of persons dispatched to the current receiving mechanism by the current dispatching mechanism and is stored.

A second calculation unit configured to calculate a new number of dispatchable persons of the current dispatching mechanism determined by the first current dispatching mechanism determining unit or the second current dispatching mechanism determining unit, and a new number of receivable persons of the current receiving mechanism determined by the current receiving mechanism determining unit, where the new number of dispatchable persons of the current dispatching mechanism is equal to the number of dispatchable persons of the current dispatching mechanism-the current number of dispatching persons; the new receivable number of the current receiving mechanism is equal to the receivable number of the current receiving mechanism-the current number of the persons to be dispatched

The second current dispatching mechanism determining unit is used for judging whether the number of dispatchable people calculated by the second calculating unit is zero or not, if so, determining that the mechanism unique identifier next to the mechanism unique identifier is a new current dispatching mechanism according to the dispatching sequence determined by the first current dispatching mechanism determining unit, and sending a calculating instruction to the first calculating unit until the last mechanism unique identifier participates in dispatching in the dispatching sequence, so as to obtain a mutual dispatching scheme of invigilators among the multiple examination mechanisms of one examination; and if not, sending a calculation instruction to the first calculation unit.

The system 200 further includes a storage unit, configured to store each item of information acquired by the basic information determination unit, the assignment order determined by the first current dispatch mechanism determination unit, the current number of dispatches of the current dispatch mechanism to the current receiving mechanism determined by the dispatch number determination unit, and the like.

Preferably, the current reception mechanism determining unit is specifically configured to: judging whether the current dispatching mechanism supports bidirectional dispatching or not according to the parameters of the current dispatching mechanism determined by the basic information determining unit; if so, taking the examination mechanism corresponding to the minimum absolute value in the absolute values calculated by the first calculation unit as the current receiving mechanism; if not, according to the sequence of the absolute values from small to large, sequentially according to the stored assigned information of the examination mechanism corresponding to each absolute value, judging whether the examination mechanism has already sent the invigilator to the current assigning mechanism, and when judging that the examination mechanism has not sent the invigilator to the current assigning mechanism, determining the examination mechanism as the current receiving mechanism; wherein, when there is an absolute value of the same magnitude among the absolute values, any one of the absolute values of the same magnitude is randomly selected.

The embodiment can generate different invigilating mutual dispatching schemes. In this embodiment, for an examination, when a plurality of mechanisms meet the condition of the current receiving mechanism, one mechanism may be randomly selected as the current receiving mechanism. Under the condition that the information of the examination institutions is not changed and the mutual dispatching rule is not changed, the mutual dispatching among the institutions is carried out by using the method again, and different invigilation mutual dispatching schemes can be generated by the method. Therefore, aiming at the same examination, the method can generate a plurality of different invigilating mutual dispatching schemes.

Preferably, the basic information determination unit is further configured to: the number of invigilates in each examination room of one examination is obtained.

Then, as shown in fig. 8, the system 200 further comprises:

and the mutual dispatching scheme determining unit is used for multiplying each number of dispatchable persons, receivable persons and the number of dispatchable persons in the saved mutual dispatching scheme of the examinees among the multiple examination mechanisms by the number of the examinees to obtain a new mutual dispatching scheme of the examinees among the multiple examination mechanisms.

Preferably, as shown in fig. 9, the system 200 further includes:

the system comprises a setting unit and a control unit, wherein the setting unit is used for setting a white list and/or a black list, the white list comprises at least two examination mechanisms, and invigilators can be dispatched among the examination mechanisms and cannot be dispatched with other examination mechanisms except the white list; the blacklist comprises at least two mechanisms, wherein the examination mechanisms cannot dispatch the invigilators mutually, and can only dispatch the invigilators mutually with other examination mechanisms except the blacklist.

When only the blacklist is set, the first calculation unit is specifically configured to: judging whether the current dispatching mechanism is in a blacklist or not; if yes, respectively calculating the absolute value of the difference value of the receivable number of each examination mechanism, of which the number of the dispatchable people of the current dispatching mechanism is not 0, and the other receivable numbers of the examination mechanisms, of which the number of the dispatchable people is not 0, are calculated; if not, the absolute value of the difference between the number of persons capable of being dispatched by the current dispatching mechanism and the number of persons capable of being received by other examination mechanisms with the number of persons capable of being received being different from 0 is calculated. Alternatively, the first and second electrodes may be,

when setting the white list and the black list at the same time, the first calculating unit is specifically configured to: judging whether the current dispatching mechanism is in a blacklist or not; if yes, respectively calculating the absolute value of the difference value of the number of receivable persons of each examination mechanism, of which the number of the persons capable of being dispatched by the current dispatching mechanism is not 0, and the number of the receivable persons of each examination mechanism, except the black list and the white list, of which the number of the persons capable of being received is not 0; if not, the absolute value of the difference between the number of persons capable of being dispatched by the current dispatching mechanism and the number of persons capable of being received by the examination mechanisms except the white list, wherein the number of persons capable of being received is not 0, is calculated.

Preferably, the number of the white list and/or the black list may be at least one.

In conventional systems, mutual assignment of invigilators between institutions can be achieved, but only based on certain fixed rules or no rules. And cannot adapt to various flexible personnel allocation requirements.

The system in the embodiment supports setting of mutual dispatching rules such as the number of invigilators in each examination room, bidirectional dispatching, organization blacklists and organization whitelists, and the rules can be flexibly selected according to the needs of users, so that the system can meet the management demands of various mutual dispatching of invigilators.

The above description is only for the purpose of illustrating the preferred embodiments of the present invention and is not to be construed as limiting the invention, and any modifications, equivalents, improvements and the like that fall within the spirit and principle of the present invention are intended to be included therein.

Claims

1. A mutual dispatching method for invigilators among multiple examination institutions is characterized by comprising the following steps:

step 4, according to the sequence of the absolute values from small to large, sequentially according to the stored assigned information and the parameters of the current dispatching mechanism, determining the current receiving mechanism corresponding to the current dispatching mechanism;

step 7, judging whether the number of the new dispatchable persons is zero, if so, determining that the unique mechanism identifier next to the unique mechanism identifier is a new current dispatching mechanism according to the dispatching sequence, and executing the step 3 until the unique mechanism identifier last in the dispatching sequence participates in dispatching, so as to obtain and store a mutual dispatching scheme of invigilators among the multiple examination mechanisms of the examination of one time; if not, executing the step 3;

the step 4 comprises the following steps:

2. The mutual dispatching method for proctor among multiple examination facilities as claimed in claim 1, wherein the step 1 further comprises: acquiring the number of invigilates in each examination room of the examination;

the method further comprises:

3. The mutual assignment method for proctor among multiple examination facilities as claimed in claim 1 or 2, wherein before said step 2, said method further comprises:

when only the black list is set, the step 3 includes:

4. The mutual invigilator dispatching method of claim 3, wherein the number of the white list and/or the black list is at least one;

5. A generation system of an assignment scheme for invigilators, comprising:

a first calculation unit configured to calculate an absolute value of a difference between the number of persons that can be dispatched at the current dispatching mechanism and the number of persons that can be received at each of the other examination mechanisms having the number of persons other than 0, the number of persons being determined by the first current dispatching mechanism determination unit or the second current dispatching mechanism determination unit, respectively;

a second current dispatching mechanism determining unit, configured to determine whether the new number of dispatchable people calculated by the second calculating unit is zero, if so, determine, according to the dispatching order determined by the first current dispatching mechanism determining unit, that a next mechanism unique identifier of the mechanism unique identifier is a new current dispatching mechanism, and send a calculation instruction to the first calculating unit until a last mechanism unique identifier in the dispatching order participates in dispatching, so as to obtain a mutual dispatching scheme of proctor among multiple examination mechanisms of the primary examination; if not, sending a calculation instruction to the first calculation unit;

the current receiving mechanism determining unit is specifically configured to:

6. The generation system of the invigilator allocation plan as claimed in claim 5, wherein said basic information determination unit is further configured to: acquiring the number of invigilates in each examination room of the examination;

the system further comprises:

7. The generation system of the assignment scheme for examiners according to claim 5 or 6, further comprising:

8. The system for generating an assignment scheme for examiners according to claim 7, wherein the number of the white list and/or the black list is at least one.