CN108471343B

CN108471343B - Method and device for determining communication check code, and communication check method and system

Info

Publication number: CN108471343B
Application number: CN201810712749.7A
Authority: CN
Inventors: 卢小金
Original assignee: Guangzhou Shiyuan Electronics Thecnology Co Ltd
Current assignee: Guangzhou Shiyuan Electronics Thecnology Co Ltd
Priority date: 2018-06-29
Filing date: 2018-06-29
Publication date: 2021-02-02
Anticipated expiration: 2038-06-29
Also published as: CN108471343A

Abstract

The embodiment of the invention discloses a method and a device for determining a communication check code, and a method and a system for communication check. The method for determining the communication check code comprises the following steps: determining all verification feedback types of the slave control board corresponding to the instruction data sent by the master control board; determining the corresponding occurrence probability of each check feedback type in the current communication environment; and determining communication check codes with different coding lengths corresponding to the check feedback types based on the occurrence probabilities. When the communication check code determined by the method for determining the communication check code is used for communication check between the slave control board and the master control board in the intelligent equipment, the error rate of communication check information feedback of the slave control board can be greatly reduced, so that the success rate of communication transmission of the master control board and the slave control board is greatly improved, the times of repeated sending of communication information instructions of the master control board and the slave control board are reduced, the real-time performance of communication of the master control board and the slave control board is improved, and communication channel resources in the equipment are saved.

Description

Method and device for determining communication check code, and communication check method and system

Technical Field

The present invention relates to the field of communication transmission technologies, and in particular, to a method and an apparatus for determining a communication check code, and a method and a system for communication check.

Background

Along with the development of science and technology, intelligent household electrical appliances (such as intelligent lampblack absorber, intelligent refrigerator, intelligent washing machine and intelligent air conditioner) have all been widely used in people's life, compare with traditional household electrical appliances, specifically adopted intelligent display control panel to replace original hardware button among the intelligent household electrical appliances, the user can operate on intelligent display control panel and trigger required function, later intelligent display control panel passes through the communication with automatically controlled board and transmits user's instruction to make automatically controlled board carry out corresponding operation according to the user's instruction control that receives.

Generally, the intelligent display control panel can be regarded as a master control board in an intelligent household appliance, the electric control board is regarded as a slave control board in the intelligent household appliance, the master control board and the slave control board are connected based on a set communication line, and communication between the master control board and the slave control board is realized through the communication line.

The existing communication verification adopts a return verification method, namely, a slave control board returns a received command original text. However, because the communication line connecting the master control board and the slave control board is long, the environmental interference is large, the communication channel is easy to generate error codes, the error code rate of the return check of the slave control board is greatly improved, and when the check information generates error codes in the return process of the slave control board, the error codes can be mistaken by the master control board as the error codes generated during the instruction sending, the failure rate of the communication between the master control board and the slave control board is increased, the instruction is repeatedly sent between the master control board and the slave control board, the channel resource is wasted, the real-time performance of the instruction response is reduced, and the success rate of the communication between the master control board.

Disclosure of Invention

The embodiment of the invention provides a method and a device for determining a communication check code, and a method and a system for communication check, which can improve the accuracy of communication check based on the determined communication check code, thereby improving the success rate and the real-time performance of communication between a master control board and a slave control board in intelligent equipment.

In a first aspect, an embodiment of the present invention provides a method for determining a communication check code, including:

determining all verification feedback types of the slave control board corresponding to the instruction data sent by the master control board;

determining the corresponding occurrence probability of each check feedback type in the current communication environment;

and determining communication check codes with different coding lengths corresponding to the check feedback types based on the occurrence probabilities.

In a second aspect, an embodiment of the present invention provides a communication verification method, including:

the slave control board determines the validity of the instruction data received based on the current communication environment;

if the instruction data are illegal instruction data, the slave control board determines that a first verification feedback type corresponding to the instruction data currently is an instruction transmission error;

the slave control board obtains a first communication check code used for representing the instruction transmission error, and feeds the first communication check code back to the master control board, wherein the first communication check code is determined based on the determination method of the communication check code provided by the first aspect of the embodiment of the present invention.

In a third aspect, an embodiment of the present invention provides a device for determining a communication check code, including:

the verification type determining module is used for determining all verification feedback types of the slave control board corresponding to the instruction data sent by the master control board;

the occurrence probability determining module is used for determining the corresponding occurrence probability of each check feedback type in the current communication environment;

and the check code determining module is used for determining communication check codes with different coding lengths corresponding to the check feedback types based on the occurrence probabilities.

In a fourth aspect, an embodiment of the present invention provides a communication verification system, including: a slave control board and a master control board,

wherein, from the control panel, include:

the instruction legality judging module is used for determining the legality of the instruction data received based on the current communication environment;

the feedback type determining module is used for determining that the current first verification feedback type is an instruction transmission error when the instruction data is illegal instruction data;

a check code feedback module, configured to obtain a first communication check code corresponding to the instruction transmission error, and feed back the first communication check code to the main control board, where the first communication check code is determined based on the determination device for communication check codes provided in the third aspect of the embodiment of the present invention.

In a fifth aspect, an embodiment of the present invention provides an intelligent device, including:

one or more processors;

storage means for storing one or more programs;

the one or more programs are executed by the one or more processors, so that the one or more processors implement the method for determining the communication check code provided by the first aspect of the embodiment of the present invention; and/or, implementing the communication verification method provided by the second aspect of the embodiments.

In a sixth aspect, an embodiment of the present invention provides a computer-readable storage medium, on which one or more computer programs are stored, where the computer programs, when executed by a processor, implement the method for determining a communication check code as provided in the first aspect; and/or the program, when executed by the communication verification system, implements the communication verification method provided in the embodiment of the second aspect.

In the method and the device for determining the communication check code, the method and the system for determining the communication check code, all check feedback types of the slave control board corresponding to the instruction data sent by the master control board need to be determined; then determining the corresponding occurrence probability of each check feedback type in the current communication environment; finally, based on each occurrence probability, communication check codes with different coding lengths corresponding to each check feedback type can be determined. When the communication check code determined by the method for determining the communication check code is used for communication check between the slave control board and the master control board in the intelligent equipment, the error rate of communication check information feedback of the slave control board can be greatly reduced, so that the success rate of communication transmission of the master control board and the slave control board is greatly improved, the times of repeated sending of communication information instructions of the master control board and the slave control board are reduced, the real-time performance of communication of the master control board and the slave control board is improved, and communication channel resources in the equipment are saved.

Drawings

Fig. 1 is a schematic flowchart illustrating a method for determining a communication check code according to an embodiment of the present invention;

fig. 2 is a schematic flowchart of a method for determining a communication check code according to a second embodiment of the present invention;

fig. 3 is a schematic flow chart of a communication verification method according to a third embodiment of the present invention;

fig. 4 is a block diagram of a device for determining a communication check code according to a fourth embodiment of the present invention;

fig. 5 is a block diagram of a communication verification system according to a fifth embodiment of the present invention;

fig. 6 is a schematic diagram of a hardware structure of an intelligent device according to a sixth embodiment of the present invention.

Detailed Description

The present invention will be described in further detail with reference to the accompanying drawings and examples. It is to be understood that the specific embodiments described herein are merely illustrative of the invention and are not limiting of the invention. It should be further noted that, for the convenience of description, only some of the structures related to the present invention are shown in the drawings, not all of the structures.

Example one

Fig. 1 is a flowchart illustrating a method for determining a communication check code according to an embodiment of the present invention. The method is suitable for determining the communication check code required by the communication check of the master control board and the slave control board, can be executed by a communication check code determination device, can be realized by hardware and/or software, and is generally integrated in intelligent equipment.

It should be noted that the method provided in this embodiment may be specifically used in an intelligent device, and may be considered to be specifically executed by a determination device of a communication check code integrated on the intelligent device, where the intelligent device may specifically be an intelligent home device including an intelligent display control panel (a master control board) and an electric control board (a slave control board), such as an intelligent range hood, an intelligent refrigerator, an intelligent washing machine, and an intelligent air conditioner.

Specifically, the main control panel displayed in the form of the intelligent display control panel can monitor a button triggered by a user in a function menu displayed on the panel in real time in a power-on state, analyze a function instruction actually corresponding to the button, and simultaneously form instruction data representing the function instruction; and then, the slave control board body displayed in the form of the electric control board can be used for receiving the instruction data sent by the main control board and executing the function operation corresponding to the instruction data so as to realize the function response to the button triggered by the user.

It can be known that the master control board and the slave control board in the smart device have communication functions, and therefore, the instruction data formed by the master control board can be transmitted to the slave control board through the communication functions, wherein the communication functions can be implemented through a communication module, and the communication module can be implemented with the master control board or the slave control board in an internal or external manner, and the communication functions include but are not limited to: a wireless communication connection based on WiFi and Wlan forms, or a wired communication connection based on network data line forms.

The application context of this embodiment can be specifically described as follows: when the intelligent device is in a working state, instruction data corresponding to a button triggered by a user are formed on the master control board, the instruction data are transmitted to the slave control board based on the communication module, the slave control board analyzes and processes the received instruction data, and communication verification feedback is performed to the master control board in a communication verification code mode according to the analysis and processing results.

As shown in fig. 1, a method for determining a communication check code according to an embodiment of the present invention includes the following operations:

s101, determining all verification feedback types of the slave control board corresponding to the instruction data sent by the master control board.

In this embodiment, the method may be specifically executed by a determination device of a communication check code integrated in the smart device, where the instruction data may be specifically understood as data that is formed by the main control board based on a trigger of a user and is used for representing instruction control information. It can be understood that the master control board in the intelligent device may transmit the instruction data to the slave control board through the communication module, and after receiving the instruction data, the slave control board may perform analysis processing on the instruction data, where the analysis processing specifically may include analyzing the legitimacy of the instruction data and performing response processing on the legitimate instruction data.

Generally, when the slave control board actually performs instruction data analysis processing, a plurality of different analysis processing results may appear, in this embodiment, this step is equivalent to being executed by a determination device of a communication check code integrated in the smart device, specifically, all analysis processing results that may appear after the slave control board performs instruction data analysis processing may be obtained, and in order to better represent each analysis processing result, this embodiment regards each analysis processing result as one check feedback type, and thus, based on the above operation, this step is equivalent to determining all check feedback types that may exist when the slave control board analyzes and processes instruction data, in this embodiment, different check feedback types may be specifically used to distinguish different analysis processing situations that may appear when the slave control board processes instruction data, and different check feedback types may be subjected to communication check feedback to the master control board in the form of a communication check code by the slave control board, to inform the master control board of the processing of the received instruction data.

Specifically, the present embodiment may determine all types of verification feedback that the slave control board may have when communicating the verification feedback by obtaining an analysis processing result that may occur when the slave control board processes the received instruction data. For example, this step may obtain all analysis processing results of the slave control board for analyzing and processing the instruction data, for example, the slave control board may analyze that the received instruction data does not have executable functional operations, and thus the slave control board considers that the instruction data is erroneously transmitted in the communication transmission, and determines that a corresponding analysis processing result at this time is: the instruction data is equivalent to illegal instruction data, the analysis processing result can be obtained in the step, and the analysis processing result can be regarded as a check feedback type; similarly, when the other analysis processing results determined by the slave control board are obtained in this step, the analysis processing results are also regarded as a verification feedback type correspondingly, and finally, all verification feedback types which may appear when the slave control board analyzes and processes the instruction data can be obtained in this step.

And S102, determining the corresponding occurrence probability of each check feedback type in the current communication environment.

It should be noted that, the instruction data received by the slave control board is sent by the master control board through the communication module, when the master control board sends the instruction data to the slave control board, the control system integrated on the master control board, the communication channel provided in the communication module and the control system integrated on the slave control board constitute a communication environment for transmitting the instruction data, and different communication environments (such as processing performance of the control system, resource occupation condition of the communication channel or signal-to-noise ratio) may affect generation and transmission of the instruction data, thereby affecting correctness of the instruction data received by the slave control board, and further affecting an analysis processing result of the slave control board on analysis processing of the instruction data.

In this embodiment, the occurrence probability may be specifically understood as how frequently various analysis processing results occur when the slave control board performs analysis processing on the received instruction data, and is also equivalent to how frequently various verification feedback types occur. Based on a large amount of test research by technicians, it is preferable that the present embodiment considers that the situations of the various verification feedback types are actually related to the communication environments relied on when the master control board and the slave control board communicate, based on the influence of different communication environments on the generation and transmission of the instruction data, the occurrence probabilities of the various verification feedback types in different communication environments can be considered to be different, and the occurrence probabilities corresponding to the verification feedback types in different communication environments can be formed according to historical test data and historical experience values.

Therefore, when the determination device based on the communication check code in the intelligent device executes the step, the communication channel currently formed by the control system and the communication module currently integrated by the master control board and the slave control board can be obtained, so that the current communication environment depending on instruction data transmission can be determined, and then the occurrence probability that each check feedback type determined in the step S101 should have in the current communication environment can be obtained according to the mapping relation between the pre-formed communication environment and the occurrence probability of each check feedback type.

And S103, determining communication check codes with different coding lengths corresponding to the check feedback types based on the occurrence probabilities.

In this embodiment, the communication check code may be specifically understood as an information representation mode representing a check feedback type appearing after the slave control board analyzes and processes the instruction data, and the slave control board may perform communication check feedback to the master control board in the communication check code mode to inform the slave control board of an analysis and processing result of the instruction data.

Therefore, when the determination device based on the communication check code in the intelligent device executes the step, the corresponding communication check code can be set for the determined different check feedback types, and the step can specifically set the communication check code expressed by different coding lengths for different check feedback types according to the occurrence probability of each check feedback type in the current communication environment. Specifically, when the communication check code is set for each check feedback type, the communication check code with the smaller length is mainly set from the perspective of the occurrence probability of the check feedback type, for example, the communication check code with the smaller length may be set for the check feedback type with the higher occurrence probability, for different check feedback types, the embodiment may omit the specific coding content forming the communication check code, and form different communication check codes from the perspective of the coding length only based on the corresponding occurrence probability, so as to determine the communication check code corresponding to each check feedback type, thereby weakening the influence of the specific coding content on the communication check feedback accuracy in the communication transmission process.

In this embodiment, the determined occurrence probability specifically indicates how frequently the analysis processing result corresponding to each verification feedback type occurs in the slave control board, and if the occurrence probability of one verification feedback type is higher, it indicates that the frequency of the analysis processing result corresponding to the verification feedback type is higher, so that this embodiment may set a verification information identifier that is easier to transmit and identify for the processing result that occurs more frequently, as a communication verification code of the corresponding verification feedback type, so as to characterize the analysis processing result that is fed back from the communication verification of the slave control board to the master control board based on the communication verification code.

It should be noted that, when the communication check code is set for each check feedback type in this embodiment, the difference from the conventional communication check code is that different code lengths are preferably used as the communication check codes with different check identifiers in this embodiment, that is, the master control board may determine what the analysis processing result that the slave control board wants to feedback from the code length of the received communication check code only, without considering the specific content of the received communication check code.

The method for determining the communication check code provided by the embodiment of the invention comprises the steps of firstly determining all check feedback types of command data sent by a slave control board corresponding to a master control board; then determining the corresponding occurrence probability of each check feedback type in the current communication environment; finally, based on each occurrence probability, communication check codes with different coding lengths corresponding to each check feedback type can be determined. When the communication check code determined by the method for determining the communication check code provided by the embodiment is used for communication check between the slave control board and the master control board in the intelligent device, the error rate of communication check information feedback of the slave control board can be greatly reduced, so that the success rate of communication transmission of the master control board and the slave control board is greatly improved, the times of repeated sending of communication information instructions of the master control board and the slave control board are reduced, the real-time performance of communication of the master control board and the slave control board is improved, and communication channel resources in the device are saved.

Example two

Fig. 2 is a schematic flow chart of code verification determination of a communication verification method according to a second embodiment of the present invention, where the second embodiment is optimized based on the above-mentioned embodiments, and in this embodiment, all verification feedback types that determine that the slave control board corresponds to the instruction data sent by the master control board are further optimized as follows: acquiring all judgment result types of the slave control board for carrying out validity judgment corresponding to the instruction data sent by the master control board; acquiring all response result types when the slave control board responds to the instruction data; and analyzing and determining all verification feedback types when the slave control board performs communication verification to the master control board by combining each judgment result type and each response result type.

Meanwhile, the corresponding occurrence probability of each check feedback type in the current communication environment is determined, and the determination is embodied as follows: determining a current communication channel adopted by a master control board when the master control board communicates with the slave control board, and acquiring control systems respectively integrated on the master control board and the slave control board; determining a current communication environment required by the communication between the master control board and the slave control board by combining the current communication channel and each control system; and searching the corresponding occurrence probability of each check feedback type in the current communication environment from a preset communication check relation library.

In addition, communication check codes with different coding lengths corresponding to the check feedback types are determined based on the occurrence probabilities, and the determination is specifically as follows: acquiring preset communication check codes with different coding lengths, wherein the number of the preset communication check codes is the same as that of check feedback types; sorting the check feedback types from large to small based on the probability values of the corresponding occurrence probabilities; and distributing each preset communication check code to each sorted check feedback type in sequence from small to large based on the corresponding coding length to serve as the communication check code corresponding to each check feedback type.

As shown in fig. 2, a method for determining a communication check code according to a second embodiment of the present invention specifically includes the following operations:

s201, all judgment result types of the slave control board for judging the legality corresponding to the instruction data sent by the master control board are obtained.

S202, all response result types when the slave control board responds to the instruction data are obtained.

And S203, analyzing and determining all verification feedback types when the slave control board performs communication verification to the master control board by combining each judgment result type and each response result type.

The above S201 to S203 of this embodiment provide specific steps for determining the verification feedback type. It can be understood that, the above steps of this embodiment are also performed based on the determination device for the communication check code in the smart device, specifically, all types of determination results that may be possessed by the slave control board when analyzing and determining the legality of the instruction data may be obtained by the device by performing the above steps, and if the determination result is that the instruction data is legal or the instruction data is illegal, two types of determination results may be considered, where the instruction data is sent from the master control board to the slave control board. Then, this embodiment may further obtain all response result types that may be possessed by the slave controller when executing, processing, and responding to the instruction data, where two response result types may be considered if the response result is that the instruction data is correctly executed or the instruction data is failed to be executed.

After determining all possible types of the determination results and all possible types of the response results, the embodiment can determine all possible types of the verification feedback when the slave control board analyzes and processes the instruction data according to the set communication verification rule. The communication verification rule may be specifically understood as a preset feedback time for performing communication verification feedback from the control board to the main control board or a trigger condition for performing feedback, for example, when the communication verification rule performs verification feedback after validity determination, and performs verification feedback again after instruction response is performed, it may be considered that there are 4 actual verification feedback types at this time, which are respectively corresponding to instruction data being legal, instruction data being illegal, instruction data being correctly executed, and instruction data being failed to be executed.

S204, determining a current communication channel adopted when the master control board communicates with the slave control board, and acquiring control systems respectively integrated on the master control board and the slave control board.

And S205, determining the current communication environment required by the communication between the master control board and the slave control board by combining the current communication channel and each control system.

S206, searching the corresponding occurrence probability of each check feedback type under the current communication environment from a preset communication check relation library.

The above-mentioned S204 to S206 of this embodiment give specific steps of the determination device for determining the occurrence probability of the check feedback type, in this embodiment, it can be understood that when the master control board and the slave control board perform communication interaction, there are many factors determining the communication environment, and generally, the communication channels (specifically, signal to noise ratio of the communication channels or resource occupancy rate of the channels, etc.) and the control systems respectively integrated by the master control board and the slave control board (specifically, processing performance of the control systems) are considered comprehensively, and the communication environments that different communication channels or control systems may form are not the same, under different communication environments, the main control board and the slave control board carry out communication transmission of the instruction data and the slave control board processes the received instruction data, the frequency of the various check feedback types is different, therefore, the present embodiment may determine the current communication environment that the master control board and the slave control board depend on for the current communication interaction.

It should be noted that, before the method for determining a communication check code provided in the embodiment of the present invention, multiple dependable communication environments may be artificially set for communication interaction between the master control board and the slave control board, and the frequency of occurrence of each check feedback type is tested in each communication environment, so that the probability of occurrence of each check feedback type in different communication environments is summarized according to the historical experience, and a communication check relation library may be formed based on the above information. Therefore, the communication verification relation library comprises the occurrence probability of each verification feedback type in different communication environments, and the occurrence probability corresponding to each verification feedback type in the current communication environment can be directly searched in the communication verification relation library after the current communication environment is determined based on the steps of the embodiment.

It can be understood that the artificially constructed communication verification relation library may be updated in real time, for example, the types of the added communication environments may be updated, and the occurrence probability of each determined verification feedback type in the newly added communication environment may be given, and the new verification feedback types may also be updated and added, and the occurrence probability of each newly added verification feedback type in each communication environment may be determined.

And S207, acquiring preset communication check codes with different coding lengths, wherein the number of the preset communication check codes is the same as that of the check feedback types.

In this embodiment, after determining the possible check feedback types, the number of all the check feedback types may be counted, and then preset communication check codes with the same number as the check feedback types are preset, where the preset communication check codes have different coding lengths.

It should be noted that, in this embodiment, a communication standard based on which is specifically defined in what is specifically used as a basic communication unit to transmit instruction data or other information data in the communication interaction process may be first determined in the communication interaction process performed by the master control board and the slave control board, and the communication standard may be specifically set based on an actual transmission requirement, and in this embodiment, it is preferable to set a bit as the basic communication unit or a byte as the basic communication unit as the communication standard. In the present embodiment, when setting each of the predetermined communication check codes, it is considered to set each of the predetermined communication check codes according to the communication standard, for example, different predetermined communication check codes may be set by using a byte as a unit or using a bit as a unit, and it is ensured that the set predetermined communication check codes have different coding lengths, for example, when setting the byte, it can be understood that each of the predetermined communication check codes has different byte numbers, and when setting the bit, it can be understood that each of the predetermined communication check codes has different bit numbers.

In addition, it should be noted that, in this embodiment, the specific content of each preset communication check code is not limited in theory, for example, the content of each preset communication check code may be filled with 0; the communication check code determined by the embodiment is used for communication check, the check information is not determined by the content actually contained in each communication check code, but the communication check code is determined by the coding length of the communication check code, and therefore, what instruction check information is specifically indicated. However, in combination with a practical application scenario, in order to facilitate identification of each communication check code during communication check, in this embodiment, it is preferable to set each preset communication check code in a form in which high and low levels of 0 and 1 alternately appear, so as to ensure reliable identification of the coding length of each transmitted communication check code by the master control board and the slave control board.

And S208, sequencing the check feedback types from large to small according to the probability values of the corresponding occurrence probabilities.

And S209, sequentially distributing each preset communication check code to each sorted check feedback type from small to large based on the corresponding coding length to serve as the communication check code corresponding to each check feedback type.

In this embodiment, the above S207 to S209 provide specific steps for determining the communication check codes included in the check feedback types, and after the preset communication check codes with the same number as the check feedback types are set based on the above S207, it needs to further determine how to allocate the communication check codes to each check feedback type.

It can be known that, when the actual check information of the check feedback type is represented by only the code length, compared with the existing method, the representation range of the communication check code is greatly reduced, and if a communication check code with a larger code length is allocated to a frequently-occurring check feedback type, the average code length in the transmission process of the check code is greatly increased, and further the real-time performance of communication interaction is possibly influenced. Therefore, in this embodiment, it is preferably considered that the preset communication check codes with the lower code length are allocated to the check feedback types with the higher occurrence probability, specifically, in this embodiment, the corresponding check feedback types are ranked from large to small based on the probability values of the respective occurrence probabilities, then the preset communication check code with the smallest code length is allocated to the check feedback type with the highest occurrence probability, and the preset communication check codes are sequentially allocated to the respective check feedback types based on the rule to serve as the communication check codes corresponding to the check feedback types.

The second method for determining the communication check code according to the embodiment of the present invention embodies the operation for determining the check feedback type, also embodies the operation for determining the occurrence probability of each check feedback type, and also embodies the operation for determining the communication check code corresponding to each check feedback type. By using the method, different check feedback types can be represented by communication check codes with different coding lengths, so that check information represented by the check feedback types can be distinguished through the coding lengths, the error rate of the communication check codes during communication check is reduced, the success rate of communication transmission of the master control board and the slave control board is greatly improved, the times of repeated sending of communication information instructions of the master control board and the slave control board are reduced, the real-time performance of communication of the master control board and the slave control board is improved, and communication channel resources in equipment are saved.

EXAMPLE III

Fig. 3 is a schematic flow chart of a communication verification method according to a third embodiment of the present invention. The method is suitable for the situation that the communication check feedback is carried out between the slave control board and the master control board in the intelligent equipment, and can be executed by a communication check system which is generally integrated in the intelligent equipment.

It should be noted that, when performing communication verification based on the communication verification method provided in this embodiment, the communication verification code used for characterizing the analysis and processing result of the slave control board on the instruction data may be specifically determined based on the determination method of the communication verification code provided in the first embodiment or the second embodiment. Therefore, the communication verification method provided in this embodiment can be specifically understood as a specific application process implemented based on the communication verification code determined in the above embodiment of the present invention.

As shown in fig. 3, a communication verification method provided in the third embodiment of the present invention specifically includes the following operations:

s301, the slave control board determines the legality of the instruction data received based on the current communication environment.

In this embodiment, it can be considered that the master control board and the slave control board perform communication interaction based on the current communication environment, and the master control board can generate corresponding instruction data to be sent and transmit the instruction data to the slave control board based on the current communication environment after a user triggers a button on the intelligent display control panel. The slave control board may then determine the legitimacy of the received instruction data based on the operation of this step.

Specifically, in this step, the slave control board may analyze the received instruction data, and search for whether the received instruction data exists in a preset instruction function relationship library, and if so, the received instruction data is considered to be legal and corresponding to the executable function operation, otherwise, the received instruction data is considered to be illegal and the executable function operation does not exist.

S302, if the instruction data are illegal instruction data, the slave control board determines that the first verification feedback type corresponding to the instruction data currently is an instruction transmission error.

In this embodiment, based on the determination of the above steps, when the instruction data does not exist in the instruction function relationship library, the slave control board may regard the instruction data as illegal instruction data, and thus, the illegal instruction data is also equivalent to one of the analysis processing results of the instruction data, and the verification feedback type of the analysis processing result is recorded as a first verification feedback type, and the analysis processing result actually represented by the first verification feedback type is an instruction transmission error.

And S303, the slave control board acquires a first communication check code for indicating instruction transmission error, and feeds back the first communication check code to the master control board.

The first communication check code is determined based on the determination method of the communication check code provided in the first embodiment or the second embodiment of the present invention.

In this embodiment, after determining the first verification feedback type, the slave control board may feed back a communication verification code representing a corresponding analysis processing result to the master control board according to a preset communication verification rule, and in this embodiment, the communication verification code corresponding to the first verification feedback type is recorded as the first communication verification code. Specifically, based on the determination method for the communication check code, the occurrence probability of the first communication check type (instruction transmission error) in the current communication environment may be determined, and thus the first communication check code corresponding to the first communication check type is determined. In this step, the slave control board may obtain the determined first communication check code, and feed back the first communication check code to the master control board.

On the basis of the above embodiment, the communication method provided in this embodiment further includes the following steps shown in fig. 3:

and S304, if the instruction data is legal instruction data, the slave control board controls and executes the instruction data, and determines a second check feedback type corresponding to the instruction data currently according to the response result.

It is to be understood that the first verification feedback type may be regarded as one of the verification feedback types that the instruction data has, and when the slave control board determines that the instruction data exists in the instruction function relational database, the instruction data may be regarded as legal instruction data, and in this determination result, the slave control board may further determine a functional operation corresponding to the instruction data from the instruction function relational database, and in response to executing the functional operation corresponding thereto, and thus a response result after the response is executed is also equivalent to one of the analysis processing results of the instruction data, and may determine that the verification feedback type of the analysis processing result is the second verification feedback type.

It is understood that the second verification feedback type in the present embodiment actually includes two response result types. Specifically, the determining, according to the response result, the second check feedback type currently corresponding to the instruction data includes: when the response result is that the instruction is executed correctly, determining that the current corresponding second check feedback type of the instruction data is that the instruction is legal and executed correctly; and when the response result is that the instruction execution fails, determining that the current corresponding second check feedback type of the instruction data is an error execution legal instruction.

As can be seen from the above operation steps, the second check feedback type may be that the instruction is executed legally and correctly, or that the legal instruction is executed incorrectly.

S305, obtaining a second communication check code for representing the second check feedback type from the control board, and feeding back the second communication check code to the main control board.

The second communication check code is also determined based on the determination method of the communication check code provided in the first embodiment or the second embodiment of the present invention.

It can be understood that, after the second check feedback type is determined, the slave control board may also feed back, to the master control board, the communication check code representing the corresponding analysis processing result according to a preset communication check rule, in this embodiment, the communication check code corresponding to the second check feedback type is marked as the second communication check code, the slave control board may also obtain, based on this step, the second communication check code possessed by the second check feedback type, and when the analysis processing result actually represented by the second check feedback type is different, the corresponding second communication check code is also different.

S306, the main control board analyzes the currently received communication check code and carries out corresponding operation based on the analysis result.

In this embodiment, the main control board may analyze the communication check code received in real time to determine the check feedback type actually represented by the received communication check code, and thereby analyze the analysis processing result corresponding to the check feedback type, so as to perform subsequent operations based on the analysis processing result. Illustratively, when the analyzed result is that the instruction data transmitted to the slave control board initially is an instruction transmission error, the correct instruction data is retransmitted to the slave control board again; when the analyzed result is that the instruction data is legal and is correctly executed, the master control board can end the communication interaction with the slave control board; when the analyzed result is that the instruction data is legal but the execution is wrong, the master control board can retransmit the correct instruction data to the slave control board again so that the slave control board can execute the corresponding functional operation again.

The communication verification method provided by the third embodiment of the invention is mainly applied to communication verification of a slave control board and a master control board, firstly, the slave control board determines the legality of instruction data received based on the current communication environment, and then when the instruction data is judged to be illegal instruction data, the slave control board determines that the current corresponding first verification feedback type is an instruction transmission error; and then, acquiring a first communication check code for indicating the instruction transmission error from the control board, and feeding back the first communication check code to the main control board. In the communication verification method, the corresponding communication verification codes are determined for different verification feedback types based on the determination method of the communication verification codes, so that verification information represented by the verification feedback types is distinguished through the coding length, the error rate of the communication verification codes during communication verification is reduced, the success rate of communication transmission of the master control board and the slave control board is greatly improved, the times of repeated sending of communication information instructions of the master control board and the slave control board are reduced, the real-time performance of communication of the master control board and the slave control board is improved, and communication channel resources in equipment are saved.

Example four

Fig. 4 is a block diagram of a device for determining a communication check code according to a fourth embodiment of the present invention. The device is suitable for determining the communication check code required by the communication check of the master control board and the slave control board, can be realized by hardware and/or software, and is generally integrated in intelligent equipment. As shown in fig. 4, the apparatus includes: a check type determination module 41, an occurrence probability determination module 42, and a check code determination module 43.

The verification type determining module 41 is configured to determine all verification feedback types of the slave control board corresponding to the instruction data sent by the master control board;

an occurrence probability determining module 42, configured to determine occurrence probabilities corresponding to the check feedback types in the current communication environment;

and a check code determining module 43, configured to determine, based on each occurrence probability, communication check codes with different coding lengths corresponding to each check feedback type.

In this embodiment, the apparatus first determines all verification feedback types of the slave control board corresponding to the instruction data sent by the master control board through the verification type determining module 41; then, determining the corresponding occurrence probability of each check feedback type in the current communication environment through an occurrence probability determination module; finally, the check code determining module 43 determines the communication check codes with different coding lengths corresponding to the check feedback types based on the occurrence probabilities.

According to the device for determining the communication check code provided by the fourth embodiment of the invention, when the communication check is performed between the slave control board and the master control board in the intelligent device, the communication check code determined by the device for determining the communication check code can greatly reduce the error rate when the communication check information of the slave control board is fed back, so that the success rate of communication transmission of the master control board and the slave control board is greatly improved, the times of repeated sending of communication information instructions of the master control board and the slave control board are further reduced, the real-time performance of communication between the master control board and the slave control board is improved, and the communication channel resources in the device are saved.

Further, the check type determining module 41 is specifically configured to:

acquiring all judgment result types of the slave control board for carrying out validity judgment corresponding to the instruction data sent by the master control board;

acquiring all response result types when the slave control board responds to the instruction data;

and analyzing and determining all verification feedback types when the slave control board performs communication verification to the master control board by combining each judgment result type and each response result type.

Further, the occurrence probability determining module 42 is specifically configured to:

determining a current communication channel adopted by a master control board when the master control board communicates with the slave control board, and acquiring control systems respectively integrated on the master control board and the slave control board;

determining a current communication environment required by the communication between the master control board and the slave control board by combining the current communication channel and each control system;

and searching the corresponding occurrence probability of each check feedback type in the current communication environment from a preset communication check relation library.

Further, the check code determining module 43 is specifically configured to:

acquiring preset communication check codes with different coding lengths, wherein the number of the preset communication check codes is the same as that of check feedback types;

sorting the check feedback types from large to small based on the probability values of the corresponding occurrence probabilities;

and distributing each preset communication check code to each sorted check feedback type in sequence from small to large based on the corresponding coding length to serve as the communication check code corresponding to each check feedback type.

EXAMPLE five

Fig. 5 is a block diagram of a communication verification system according to a fifth embodiment of the present invention. This system is applicable to the condition that carries out check-up information feedback from the master control board with the slave control board in the smart machine, as shown in fig. 5, this communication check-up system includes: a slave control board 51 and a master control board 52. The slave board 51 and the master board 52 in this embodiment may be connected based on a communication bus.

Wherein, from the control panel 51, include:

the instruction legality judging module 511 is configured to determine the legality of instruction data received based on the current communication environment;

a feedback type determining module 512, configured to determine that the current first verification feedback type is an instruction transmission error when the instruction data is illegal instruction data;

a check code feedback module 513, configured to obtain a first communication check code corresponding to the instruction transmission error, and feed back the first communication check code to the main control board, where the first communication check code is determined based on the determination device for communication check codes provided in the fourth embodiment.

In the communication verification system provided by the fourth embodiment of the present invention, the corresponding communication verification code is determined for different verification feedback types based on the determination device for the communication verification code, so that verification information indicated by the verification feedback types is distinguished by the coding length, thereby reducing the error rate of the communication verification code during communication verification, greatly improving the success rate of communication transmission between the master control board and the slave control board, further reducing the times of repeatedly sending communication information instructions of the master control board and the slave control board, improving the real-time performance of communication between the master control board and the slave control board, and saving communication channel resources in equipment.

Further, the feedback type determining module 512 is further configured to:

when the instruction data is legal instruction data, executing the instruction data, and determining a second check feedback type currently corresponding to the instruction data according to a response result;

accordingly, the check code feedback module 513 is further configured to:

acquiring a second communication check code corresponding to the second check feedback type, and feeding back the second communication check code to the main control board, wherein the second communication check code is determined based on the determination method of the communication check code according to any one of claims 1 to 4.

Further, the feedback type determining module 512 is specifically configured to:

when the instruction data is legal instruction data, executing the instruction data, when the response result is that the instruction is correctly executed, determining that the second check feedback type corresponding to the instruction data currently is legal and correctly executed, and when the response result is that the instruction is failed to be executed, determining that the second check feedback type corresponding to the instruction data currently is an incorrectly executed legal instruction.

On the basis of the above optimization, the main control board 52 includes:

and the check code analysis module 521 is configured to analyze the currently received communication check code and perform corresponding operations based on the analysis result.

EXAMPLE six

Fig. 6 is a schematic diagram of a hardware structure of an intelligent device according to a sixth embodiment of the present invention. As shown in fig. 6, the intelligent device provided in this embodiment includes: a processor 61 and a storage device 62. The processor 61 and the storage device 62 in the smart device may be connected by a bus or other means, and fig. 6 illustrates the connection by the bus as an example.

It should be noted that, in fig. 6, only the connection relationship between the processor 61 and the storage device 62 is described, and the number of the processors and the storage devices included in the smart device is not limited, and this embodiment may preferably include two processors and two storage devices, one processor and one storage device may be specifically integrated in a master control board of the smart device, and the other processor and the other storage device may be specifically integrated in a slave control board of the smart device, so that the master control board and the slave control board may execute the determination method of the communication verification code provided in the foregoing embodiment and/or the communication verification method provided in the foregoing embodiment through the processor 61 and the storage device 62 respectively included in the master control board and the slave control board.

In this embodiment, the storage device 62 in the smart device is used as a computer-readable storage medium, and can be used to store one or more programs, which may be software programs, computer-executable programs, and modules, such as program instructions/modules corresponding to the determination method of the communication check code provided in one or both embodiments of the present invention (for example, the modules in the determination device of the communication check code shown in fig. 4 include the check type determination module 41, the occurrence probability determination module 42, and the check code determination module 43); for another example, the program instructions/modules in the communication verification method provided in the third embodiment of the present invention (for example, the modules in the slave control board and the master control board in the communication verification system shown in fig. 5, where the modules in the slave control board include an instruction legality determining module 511, a feedback type determining module 512, and a verification code feedback module 513, and the modules in the master control board include a verification code analyzing module 521). The processor 61 executes various functional applications and data processing of the intelligent device by running software programs, instructions and modules stored in the storage device 62, that is, the method for determining the communication check code in the above method embodiment is implemented; and/or, a communication verification method.

The storage device 62 may include a storage program area and a storage data area, wherein the storage program area may store an operating system, an application program required for at least one function; the storage data area may store data created according to use of the device, and the like. Further, the storage device 62 may include high speed random access memory, and may also include non-volatile memory, such as at least one magnetic disk storage device, flash memory device, or other non-volatile solid state storage device. In some examples, the storage device 62 may further include memory located remotely from the processor 61, which may be connected to the device over a network. Examples of such networks include, but are not limited to, the internet, intranets, local area networks, mobile communication networks, and combinations thereof.

And, when the one or more programs included in the above-mentioned smart device are executed by the one or more processors 61, the programs perform the following operations:

determining a verification feedback type when the slave control board performs instruction verification information feedback; determining the corresponding occurrence probability of each check feedback type in the current communication environment; and determining communication check codes corresponding to the check feedback types based on the occurrence probabilities. And/or the program performs the following operations:

the slave control board determines the validity of the instruction data received based on the current communication environment; if the instruction data are illegal instruction data, the slave control board determines that a first verification feedback type corresponding to the instruction data currently is an instruction transmission error; the slave control board obtains a first communication check code used for indicating the instruction transmission error, and feeds the first communication check code back to the master control board, wherein the first communication check code is determined based on the determination method of the communication check code provided in the first embodiment and/or the second embodiment.

In addition, an embodiment of the present invention further provides a computer-readable storage medium, on which a computer program is stored, where the computer program, when executed by a processor, implements a method for determining a communication check code according to one or two embodiments of the present invention, where the method includes: determining a verification feedback type when the slave control board performs instruction verification information feedback; determining the corresponding occurrence probability of each check feedback type in the current communication environment; and determining communication check codes corresponding to the check feedback types based on the occurrence probabilities.

Meanwhile, when being executed by the processor, the program can also realize the communication verification method provided by the third embodiment of the invention, and the method comprises the following steps: the slave control board determines the validity of the instruction data received based on the current communication environment; if the instruction data are illegal instruction data, the slave control board determines that a first verification feedback type corresponding to the instruction data currently is an instruction transmission error; the slave control board obtains a first communication check code used for indicating the instruction transmission error, and feeds the first communication check code back to the master control board, wherein the first communication check code is determined based on the determination method of the communication check code provided in the first embodiment and/or the second embodiment.

From the above description of the embodiments, it is obvious for those skilled in the art that the present invention can be implemented by software and necessary general hardware, and certainly, can also be implemented by hardware, but the former is a better embodiment in many cases. Based on such understanding, the technical solutions of the present invention may be embodied in the form of a software product, which may be stored in a computer-readable storage medium, such as a floppy disk, a Read-Only Memory (ROM), a Random Access Memory (RAM), a FLASH Memory (FLASH), a hard disk or an optical disk of a computer, and includes instructions for enabling an intelligent device (which may be a personal computer, a server, or a network device) to execute the methods according to the embodiments of the present invention.

It is to be noted that the foregoing is only illustrative of the preferred embodiments of the present invention and the technical principles employed. It will be understood by those skilled in the art that the present invention is not limited to the particular embodiments described herein, but is capable of various obvious changes, rearrangements and substitutions as will now become apparent to those skilled in the art without departing from the scope of the invention. Therefore, although the present invention has been described in greater detail by the above embodiments, the present invention is not limited to the above embodiments, and may include other equivalent embodiments without departing from the spirit of the present invention, and the scope of the present invention is determined by the scope of the appended claims.

Claims

1. A method for determining a communication check code, comprising:

determining communication check codes with different coding lengths corresponding to the check feedback types based on the occurrence probabilities;

and the slave control board analyzes and processes the instruction data and performs communication verification feedback to the master control board in a communication verification code mode according to the analysis and processing result.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the determining all the verification feedback types of the slave control board corresponding to the instruction data sent by the master control board comprises:

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the determining the probability of occurrence of each of the verification feedback types in the current communication environment comprises:

4. The method of claim 1, wherein determining communication check codes with different coding lengths corresponding to the check feedback types based on the occurrence probabilities comprises:

5. A communication verification method, comprising:

the slave control board obtains a first communication check code used for indicating the instruction transmission error, and feeds the first communication check code back to the master control board, wherein the first communication check code is determined based on the determination method of the communication check code according to any one of claims 1 to 4.

6. The method of claim 5, further comprising:

if the instruction data is legal instruction data, the slave control board controls and executes the instruction data, and determines a second check feedback type corresponding to the instruction data currently according to a response result;

the slave control board obtains a second communication check code for indicating the second check feedback type, and feeds back the second communication check code to the master control board, wherein the second communication check code is determined based on the determination method of the communication check code according to any one of claims 1 to 4.

7. The method of claim 6, wherein determining the second type of verification feedback currently corresponding to the instruction data according to the response result comprises:

when the response result is that the instruction is executed correctly, determining that the current corresponding second check feedback type of the instruction data is that the instruction is legal and executed correctly;

and when the response result is that the instruction execution fails, determining that the current corresponding second check feedback type of the instruction data is an error execution legal instruction.

8. The method of any one of claims 5-7, further comprising:

and the main control board analyzes the currently received communication check code and performs corresponding operation based on the analysis result.

9. An apparatus for determining a communication check code, comprising:

a check code determining module, configured to determine, based on each occurrence probability, communication check codes with different coding lengths corresponding to each check feedback type;

10. A communication verification system, comprising: a slave control board and a master control board,

wherein, from the control panel, include:

a check code feedback module, configured to obtain a first communication check code corresponding to the instruction transmission error, and feed back the first communication check code to the main control board, where the first communication check code is determined based on the determination device for the communication check code according to claim 9.

11. An intelligent device for implementing a method for determining a communication check code, comprising:

one or more processors;

storage means for storing one or more programs;

the one or more programs being executable by the one or more processors to cause the one or more processors to implement the communication check code determination method of any of claims 1-4.

12. An intelligent device for implementing a communication verification method, comprising:

one or more processors;

storage means for storing one or more programs;

the one or more programs being executable by the one or more processors to cause the one or more processors to implement the communication verification method of any of claims 5-8.

13. A computer-readable storage medium, on which a computer program is stored, the program, when executed by a processor, implementing the method for determining a communication check code according to any one of claims 1 to 4; and/or the program, when executed by a communication verification system, implements a communication verification method as claimed in any one of claims 5 to 8.