CN108398939B - Fault diagnosis method based on DS evidence theory - Google Patents

Fault diagnosis method based on DS evidence theory Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN108398939B
CN108398939B CN201810169966.6A CN201810169966A CN108398939B CN 108398939 B CN108398939 B CN 108398939B CN 201810169966 A CN201810169966 A CN 201810169966A CN 108398939 B CN108398939 B CN 108398939B
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
fault
triangular fuzzy
fuzzy number
probability distribution
steps
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
CN201810169966.6A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN108398939A (en
Inventor
蒋雯
胡伟伟
邓鑫洋
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Northwest University of Technology
Original Assignee
Northwest University of Technology
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Northwest University of Technology filed Critical Northwest University of Technology
Priority to CN201810169966.6A priority Critical patent/CN108398939B/en
Publication of CN108398939A publication Critical patent/CN108398939A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN108398939B publication Critical patent/CN108398939B/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G05CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05BCONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B23/00Testing or monitoring of control systems or parts thereof
    • G05B23/02Electric testing or monitoring
    • G05B23/0205Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults
    • G05B23/0218Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults characterised by the fault detection method dealing with either existing or incipient faults
    • G05B23/0243Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults characterised by the fault detection method dealing with either existing or incipient faults model based detection method, e.g. first-principles knowledge model
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F30/00Computer-aided design [CAD]
    • G06F30/20Design optimisation, verification or simulation
    • GPHYSICS
    • G05CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05BCONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B2219/00Program-control systems
    • G05B2219/20Pc systems
    • G05B2219/24Pc safety
    • G05B2219/24065Real time diagnostics

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
  • Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
  • Geometry (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
  • Test And Diagnosis Of Digital Computers (AREA)

Abstract

The invention provides a fault diagnosis method based on an evidence theory, and relates to the field of fault diagnosis. The method comprises the steps of establishing a triangular fuzzy model for each fault, establishing a triangular fuzzy model for data to be tested, generating a basic probability distribution function according to the overlapping degree between the model to be tested and the fault model, and fusing the basic probability distribution function generated under each fault by using an evidence theory combination rule to realize fault diagnosis. The invention realizes fault diagnosis by combining the evidence theory and the triangular fuzzy number, and has the advantage of simple calculation; the basic probability distribution function generation method provided by the invention can well realize the processing of fuzzy information; the fault diagnosis method provided by the invention can realize the fault diagnosis of the motor rotor.

Description

Fault diagnosis method based on DS evidence theory
Technical Field
The invention relates to the field of fault diagnosis, in particular to a method for realizing fault diagnosis based on DS evidence theory.
Background
The fault diagnosis technology is an engineering science closely combined with actual production and is a product of modern production development. With the application of modern science and technology to equipment, the structure of the equipment is more and more complex, the function is more and more perfect, the automation degree is higher and higher, and various faults can occur to the equipment due to the influence of many unavoidable factors, so that the preset function is reduced or lost, and even serious or even catastrophic accidents can be caused.
The failure diagnosis technology is to grasp the operation state of the equipment during operation of the equipment or without detaching the equipment, and to determine whether the state of the object to be diagnosed is in an abnormal state or a failure state by analyzing and processing useful information obtained by testing the object to be diagnosed.
The information fusion technology is an information comprehensive processing technology which utilizes multi-source information in a synergistic mode to obtain more objective and more essential knowledge about objects or targets, and is one of key technologies of intelligent scientific research. Among many fusion models and methods, the D-S evidence theory algorithm is one of the most effective algorithms. Evidence theory broadens the Basic event space in probability theory into a power set of Basic events, also called recognition framework, on which a Basic probability assignment function (BPA) is built. In addition, the evidence theory also provides a Dempster combination rule which can realize evidence fusion without prior information. In particular, when BPA is only assigned on a single subset proposition of the recognition framework, BPA is transformed into probabilities in probability theory, and the fusion result of the combination rules is the same as Bayes' formula in probability theory. From this point of view, DS evidence theory can more effectively represent and process uncertain information than probability theory, and these characteristics make it widely used in the field of information fusion. Due to the fact that DS evidence theory has excellent performance in the aspect of uncertain knowledge representation, the theory and application of DS evidence theory are rapidly developed in recent years, and the DS evidence theory plays an important role in the aspects of multi-sensor information fusion, medical diagnosis, military command and target identification.
Evidence theory has many advantages, and the uncertain information appearing in the sensor signal of the equipment can be better processed when the evidence theory is applied to fault diagnosis.
Disclosure of Invention
In order to realize fault diagnosis, the invention provides a fault diagnosis method based on DS evidence theory. The fault diagnosis realized by the method can better process uncertain information in equipment sensor signals and accurately diagnose the motor rotor fault.
The technical scheme adopted by the invention for solving the technical problem comprises the following steps:
the method comprises the following steps: inputting fault sample data D of n faults and k characteristicsij(i ═ 1,2, …, n, j ═ 1,2, …, k), the fault features are features that can be used for fault classification, the fault sample data are measured values of fault features, a triangular fuzzy number model is built for each feature of each fault, and the identification framework is Θ ═ { F ═ F1,F2,...,FnThe triangular ambiguity number is a set of ambiguities over a given domain of discourse U, meaning that for any x ∈ U, there is a number μ (x) ∈ [0,1 ∈]Correspondingly, μ (x) is called the membership degree of x to U, μ is called the membership function of x, and the method for establishing the triangular fuzzy number model comprises the following steps:
will fail Fi(i ═ 1,2, …, n) sample data D for feature jijMinimum value minD ofijMean aveDijAnd maximum value maxDijRespectively as fault FiThe minimum value, the mean value and the maximum value of the feature j triangular fuzzy number model are determined as the fault FiThe triangular fuzzy number of feature j is
Figure GDA0002203656140000021
Step two: inputting k kinds of characteristic sample data T to be tested of equipment to be testedjAnd generating a triangular fuzzy number model, wherein the equipment to be tested is a motor rotor, and the method for establishing the triangular fuzzy number model comprises the following steps:
the characteristic j is sampled by the sample data T to be testedjMinimum value minT ofjMean aveTjAnd maximum value maxTjRespectively as the minimum value, the average value and the maximum value of the triangular fuzzy number model of the characteristic j to be measured, and then the triangular fuzzy number of the characteristic j to be measured is
Figure GDA0002203656140000022
Step three: matching the triangular fuzzy number model to be detected under the characteristic j with the fault triangular fuzzy number model to generate a basic probability distribution function mjThe basic probability distribution function is defined in evidence theory as for any one of the subsets A, m (A) E [0, 1] belonging to theta]And satisfyThen m is 2ΘA basic probability distribution function of wherein 2ΘIn order to identify the power set of the frame,
Figure GDA0002203656140000024
the basic probability distribution function mjThe generation method comprises the following steps:
will be provided with
Figure GDA0002203656140000025
And
Figure GDA0002203656140000026
cross area ofThe ratio of the areas under the curve is taken as the corresponding single subset element { FiThe confidence of } willIntersection area of multiple fault ambiguity numbers with feature j
Figure GDA0002203656140000029
The ratio of the areas under the curve is used as the reliability of the corresponding multi-subset element, and the single-subset element { F }iMeans that in step one if and only if the subset A contains the ith (i e [1, N ] in the recognition frame theta]) The element is that the subset A in the step one contains more than two elements in the identification frame theta, the Sum of the generated credibility is recorded as Sum, if Sum is more than or equal to 1, the generated credibility is normalized, and the normalization method comprises the following steps:
Figure GDA00022036561400000210
Figure GDA00022036561400000211
if Sum<1, then m isj{F1,F2,…,FnIs updated to mj{F1,F2,…,Fn}+1-Sum;
Step four: sequentially fusing the k generated BPA by using evidence theory combination rules to obtain mFThe combination rule of the evidence theory is
Figure GDA0002203656140000031
Wherein the ratio of A to B,
Figure GDA0002203656140000034
m1,m2two groups to be fused BPA, m is m1And m2The fused BPA, K is m1,m2The collision factor of (a) is determined,
step five: fusing the m obtained in the fourth step by using a Pistic probability transformation methodFConverting into probability distribution P, wherein the conversion method comprises the following steps:wherein
Figure GDA0002203656140000035
Step six: diagnosing the equipment fault according to the obtained probability distribution P, if P ({ F)iGet P ({ F) }) if the maximum probability in P is greater than 0.5i}) the category corresponding to the maximum probability is taken as the equipment fault diagnosis result.
The method has the advantages that the evidence theory and the triangular fuzzy number are combined to realize fault diagnosis, and the method has the advantage of simple calculation; the invention uses triangular fuzzy number to model the fault characteristics, thus solving the problem of representation of fuzzy information; the basic probability distribution function generation method provided by the invention can well realize the processing of fuzzy information; the fault diagnosis method provided by the invention can realize the fault diagnosis of the motor rotor.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a general flow chart of an implementation of the present invention.
FIG. 2 is a failure F1Feature 1 sample data D11
FIG. 3 shows the data T to be measured for feature 11
FIG. 4 shows a feature 1 to-be-tested triangular fuzzy model and a fault triangular fuzzy model.
Fig. 5 is an intersection region of two blur numbers.
Fig. 6 is an intersection region of three blur numbers.
Detailed Description
The invention is further illustrated with reference to the figures and examples. Given an example of a fault diagnosis for a rotor of an electric machine, experimental data are from [1]]。[1]In total, three faults are set, here F1,F2,F3There are four signature data for each fault, each containing five sets of 40 observations each. And selecting four groups of feature data of each feature of each fault as training samples to generate a fault triangular fuzzy number model. Selection of failure F3The remaining set of data for the four features, i.e., data not selected as training samples, is used asTest samples illustrating the implementation steps of the proposed fault diagnosis method.
The method comprises the following steps: inputting three-fault four-characteristic fault sample data Dij(i ═ 1,2, …,3, j ═ 1,2, …,4), the fault features are features that can be used for fault classification, the fault sample data are measured values of fault features, a triangular fuzzy number model is built for each feature of each fault, and the identification framework is Θ ═ { F ═ F1,F2,F3The triangular ambiguity number is a set of ambiguities over a given domain of discourse U, meaning that for any x ∈ U, there is a number μ (x) ∈ [0,1 ∈]Correspondingly, μ (x) is called the membership degree of x to U, μ is called the membership function of x, and the method for establishing the triangular fuzzy number model comprises the following steps:
we have a fault F1Feature 1 triangle fuzzy number establishment exemplifies a method for establishing a fault triangle fuzzy number model, and a fault F1Feature 1 feature data is shown in figure 2. Will fail F1Feature 1 sample data D11The minimum value 0.1518, the mean value 0.1614 and the maximum value 0.1820 of (A) are respectively taken as the fault FiThe minimum value, the mean value and the maximum value of the feature j triangular fuzzy number model are determined as the fault F1The triangular fuzzy number of feature 1 is
Figure GDA0002203656140000041
Step two: inputting sample data T with 4 characteristics to be tested of equipment to be testedj(j ═ 1,2, …,4), generating a triangular fuzzy number model, wherein the method for establishing the triangular fuzzy number model comprises the following steps:
the method for establishing the fuzzy number model of the triangle to be detected is described by taking the establishment of the fuzzy number of the triangle to be detected with the characteristic 1 as an example, and the characteristic data of the triangle to be detected is shown in figure 3. Sample data T to be tested of the feature 11The minimum value 0.3207, the mean value 0.3387 and the maximum value 0.3476 of the feature 1 to be tested are respectively used as the minimum value, the mean value and the maximum value of the triangular fuzzy number model of the feature 1 to be tested, and then the triangular fuzzy number of the feature 1 to be tested is the minimum value, the mean value and the maximum value
Figure GDA0002203656140000042
Step three: treat under the characteristic jMatching the triangle measuring fuzzy number model with the fault triangle fuzzy number model to generate a basic probability distribution function mjThe basic probability distribution function is defined in evidence theory as for any one of the subsets A, m (A) E [0, 1] belonging to theta]And satisfy
Figure GDA0002203656140000043
Then m is 2ΘA basic probability distribution function of wherein 2ΘIn order to identify the power set of the frame,
Figure GDA0002203656140000044
the basic probability distribution function mjThe generation method comprises the following steps:
will be provided with
Figure GDA0002203656140000045
And
Figure GDA0002203656140000046
cross area of
Figure GDA0002203656140000047
The ratio of the areas under the curve is taken as the corresponding single subset element { FiThe confidence of } will
Figure GDA0002203656140000048
Intersection area of multiple fault ambiguity numbers with feature j
Figure GDA0002203656140000049
The ratio of the areas under the curve is used as the reliability of the corresponding multi-subset element, and the single-subset element { F }iMeans that in step one if and only if the subset A contains the ith (i e [1, N ] in the recognition frame theta]) The element is that the subset A in the step one contains more than two elements in the identification frame theta, the Sum of the generated credibility is recorded as Sum, if Sum is more than or equal to 1, the generated credibility is normalized, and the normalization method comprises the following steps:
Figure GDA00022036561400000410
Figure GDA00022036561400000411
if Sum<1, then m isj{F1,F2,…,FnIs updated to mj{F1,F2,…,Fn}+1-Sum;
Let us take m1Production as an example illustrates the BPA production process:
(1) computingArea under the curve S ═ (0.3476-0.3207) × 1/2 ═ 0.0135;
(2)m1({F1}),m1({F2}),m1({F3}):
computing
Figure GDA0002203656140000051
And
Figure GDA0002203656140000052
cross area of
Figure GDA0002203656140000053
Then
Figure GDA0002203656140000054
Computing
Figure GDA0002203656140000055
And
Figure GDA0002203656140000056
cross area of
Figure GDA0002203656140000057
Then
Figure GDA0002203656140000058
ComputingAndcross area ofThen
(3)m1({F1,F2}),m1({F1,F3}),m1({F2,F3}),m1({F1,F2,F3}):
computing
Figure GDA00022036561400000513
And
Figure GDA00022036561400000514
cross area of
Figure GDA00022036561400000515
Then
Figure GDA00022036561400000516
Computing
Figure GDA00022036561400000517
And
Figure GDA00022036561400000518
cross area of
Figure GDA00022036561400000519
Then
Computing
Figure GDA00022036561400000521
And
Figure GDA00022036561400000522
cross area of
Figure GDA00022036561400000523
Then
Figure GDA00022036561400000524
Computing
Figure GDA00022036561400000525
And
Figure GDA00022036561400000526
cross area of
Figure GDA00022036561400000527
Then
Figure GDA00022036561400000528
(4) Since the Sum of the degrees of reliability Sum generated as described above is 0.2848, m is updated1({F1,F2,F3})=0+1-Sum=0.7152。
M can be generated by the same method2,m3,m4The results are as follows:
m2({F1})=0.0867,m2({F2})=0.2094,m2({F3})=0.3216,m2({F1,F2})=0.0365,m2({F1,F3})=0.0547,m2({F2,F3})=0.1694,m2({F1,F2,F3})=0.1217;
m3({F1})=0,m3({F2})=0,m3({F3})=0.4482,m3({F1,F2})=0,m3({F1,F3})=0,m3({F2,F3})=0,m3({F1,F2,F3})=0.5518;
m4({F1})=0,m4({F2})=0,m4({F3})=0.9745,m4({F1,F2})=0,m4({F1,F3})=0,m4({F2,F3})=0,m4({F1,F2,F3})=0.0255;
step four: sequentially fusing the 4 generated BPA by using evidence theory combination rules to obtain mFThe combination rule of the evidence theory is
Figure GDA00022036561400000529
Wherein the ratio of A to B,
Figure GDA00022036561400000531
m1,m2two groups to be fused BPA, m is m1And m2The fused BPA, K is m1,m2The collision factor of (a) is determined,
Figure GDA00022036561400000530
the fusion result is: m isF({F1})=0.0013,mF({F2})=0.0031,mF({F3})=0.9898,mF({F1,F2})=0.0006,mF({F1,F3})=0.0008,mF({F2,F3})=0.0026,mF({F1,F2,F3})=0.0018;
Step five: fusing the m obtained in the fourth step by using a Pistic probability transformation methodFConverting into probability distribution P, wherein the conversion method comprises the following steps:
Figure GDA0002203656140000061
wherein
Figure GDA0002203656140000062
Figure GDA0002203656140000063
Figure GDA0002203656140000064
Step six: diagnosing the equipment fault according to the obtained probability distribution P, if P ({ F)iGet P ({ F) }) if the maximum probability in P is greater than 0.5i}) the category corresponding to the maximum probability is used as the equipment fault diagnosis result;
the maximum probability in probability distribution P is P ({ F)3}) and P ({ F)3})>0.5, so the equipment failure is diagnosed as F3Consistent with the true fault type.
Reference to the literature
[1] Wencheng forest, xu dawn shore, multisource uncertain information fusion theory and applications [ M ] scientific press, 2012.

Claims (1)

1. A fault diagnosis method based on DS evidence theory is characterized by comprising the following steps:
the method comprises the following steps: inputting fault sample data D of n faults and k characteristicsij(i ═ 1,2, …, n, j ═ 1,2, …, k), the fault features are features that can be used for fault classification, the fault sample data are measured values of fault features, a triangular fuzzy number model is built for each feature of each fault, and the identification framework is Θ ═ { F ═ F1,F2,...,FnThe triangular ambiguity number is a set of ambiguities over a given domain of discourse U, meaning that for any x ∈ U, there is a number μ (x) ∈ [0,1 ∈]Correspondingly, μ (x) is called the membership degree of x to U, μ is called the membership function of x, and the method for establishing the triangular fuzzy number model comprises the following steps:
will fail Fi(i ═ 1,2, …, n) sample data D for feature jijMinimum value minD ofijMean aveDijAnd maximum valuemaxDijRespectively as fault FiThe minimum value, the mean value and the maximum value of the feature j triangular fuzzy number model are determined as the fault FiThe triangular fuzzy number of feature j is
Figure FDA0002203656130000011
Step two: inputting k kinds of characteristic sample data T to be tested of equipment to be testedjAnd generating a triangular fuzzy number model, wherein the equipment to be tested is a motor rotor, and the method for establishing the triangular fuzzy number model comprises the following steps:
the characteristic j is sampled by the sample data T to be testedjMinimum value minT ofjMean aveTjAnd maximum value maxTjRespectively as the minimum value, the average value and the maximum value of the triangular fuzzy number model of the characteristic j to be measured, and then the triangular fuzzy number of the characteristic j to be measured is
Figure FDA0002203656130000012
Step three: matching the triangular fuzzy number model to be detected under the characteristic j with the fault triangular fuzzy number model to generate a basic probability distribution function mjThe basic probability distribution function is defined in evidence theory as for any one of the subsets A, m (A) E [0, 1] belonging to theta]And satisfy
Figure FDA0002203656130000013
Then m is 2ΘA basic probability distribution function of wherein 2ΘIn order to identify the power set of the frame,
Figure FDA0002203656130000014
the basic probability distribution function mjThe generation method comprises the following steps:
will be provided with
Figure FDA0002203656130000015
And
Figure FDA0002203656130000016
cross area of
Figure FDA0002203656130000017
The ratio of the areas under the curve is taken as the corresponding single subset element { FiThe confidence of } will
Figure FDA0002203656130000018
Intersection area of multiple fault ambiguity numbers with feature j
Figure FDA0002203656130000019
The ratio of the areas under the curve is used as the reliability of the corresponding multi-subset element, and the single-subset element { F }iMeans that in step one if and only if the subset A contains the ith (i e [1, N ] in the recognition frame theta]) The element is that the subset A in the step one contains more than two elements in the identification frame theta, the Sum of the generated credibility is recorded as Sum, if Sum is more than or equal to 1, the generated credibility is normalized, and the normalization method comprises the following steps:
Figure FDA00022036561300000110
if Sum<1, then m isj{F1,F2,…,FnIs updated to mj{F1,F2,…,Fn}+1-Sum;
Step four: sequentially fusing the k generated BPA by using evidence theory combination rules to obtain mFThe combination rule of the evidence theory is
Figure FDA0002203656130000021
Wherein the ratio of A to B,
Figure FDA0002203656130000022
m1,m2two groups to be fused BPA, m is m1And m2The fused BPA, K is m1,m2The collision factor of (a) is determined,
Figure FDA0002203656130000023
step five: fusing the m obtained in the fourth step by using a Pistic probability transformation methodFConverting into probability distribution P, wherein the conversion method comprises the following steps:wherein
Figure FDA0002203656130000025
Step six: diagnosing the equipment fault according to the obtained probability distribution P, if P ({ F)iGet P ({ F) }) if the maximum probability in P is greater than 0.5i}) the category corresponding to the maximum probability is taken as the equipment fault diagnosis result.
CN201810169966.6A 2018-03-01 2018-03-01 Fault diagnosis method based on DS evidence theory Active CN108398939B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201810169966.6A CN108398939B (en) 2018-03-01 2018-03-01 Fault diagnosis method based on DS evidence theory

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201810169966.6A CN108398939B (en) 2018-03-01 2018-03-01 Fault diagnosis method based on DS evidence theory

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN108398939A CN108398939A (en) 2018-08-14
CN108398939B true CN108398939B (en) 2020-01-10

Family

ID=63091426

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201810169966.6A Active CN108398939B (en) 2018-03-01 2018-03-01 Fault diagnosis method based on DS evidence theory

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN108398939B (en)

Families Citing this family (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN109165632A (en) * 2018-09-20 2019-01-08 上海电力学院 A kind of equipment fault diagnosis method based on improvement D-S evidence theory
CN111366884B (en) * 2018-12-26 2023-05-16 西安西电高压开关有限责任公司 Active electronic current transformer and laser life evaluation method and device thereof
CN110059413B (en) * 2019-04-19 2022-11-15 中国航空无线电电子研究所 Fault diagnosis method
CN110166437B (en) * 2019-04-19 2020-05-19 杭州电子科技大学 Method for selecting optimal strategy for moving target defense based on DS evidence reasoning
CN111506994B (en) * 2020-04-14 2022-02-25 西北工业大学 Motor rotor fault diagnosis method based on intelligent set
CN111506045B (en) * 2020-04-24 2022-03-01 西北工业大学 Fault diagnosis method based on single-value intelligent set correlation coefficient
CN112949145A (en) * 2021-03-31 2021-06-11 西南大学 Transformer fault diagnosis method based on Duval Pentagons fault BPA function
CN117171710A (en) * 2023-11-02 2023-12-05 四川乐电新能源科技有限公司 Fault diagnosis method and fault diagnosis device for power system

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2007297931A (en) * 2006-04-28 2007-11-15 Nissan Motor Co Ltd Failure diagnosis device for exhaust emission control device for internal combustion engine
CN102208028A (en) * 2011-05-31 2011-10-05 北京航空航天大学 Fault predicting and diagnosing method suitable for dynamic complex system
CN102721941A (en) * 2012-06-20 2012-10-10 北京航空航天大学 Method for fusing and diagnosing fault information of circuit of electric meter on basis of SOM (self-organized mapping) and D-S (Dempster-Shafer) theories
CN102968109A (en) * 2012-12-03 2013-03-13 西南大学 Safety instrument system based on D-S (Dempster/Shafer) evidence theory

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN103577707A (en) * 2013-11-15 2014-02-12 上海交通大学 Robot failure diagnosis method achieved by multi-mode fusion inference

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2007297931A (en) * 2006-04-28 2007-11-15 Nissan Motor Co Ltd Failure diagnosis device for exhaust emission control device for internal combustion engine
CN102208028A (en) * 2011-05-31 2011-10-05 北京航空航天大学 Fault predicting and diagnosing method suitable for dynamic complex system
CN102721941A (en) * 2012-06-20 2012-10-10 北京航空航天大学 Method for fusing and diagnosing fault information of circuit of electric meter on basis of SOM (self-organized mapping) and D-S (Dempster-Shafer) theories
CN102968109A (en) * 2012-12-03 2013-03-13 西南大学 Safety instrument system based on D-S (Dempster/Shafer) evidence theory

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN108398939A (en) 2018-08-14

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN108398939B (en) Fault diagnosis method based on DS evidence theory
Han et al. An adaptive spatiotemporal feature learning approach for fault diagnosis in complex systems
Lei et al. New clustering algorithm-based fault diagnosis using compensation distance evaluation technique
CN108520266B (en) A kind of Time Domain Fusion method for diagnosing faults based on DS evidence theory
CN108446458B (en) A kind of Weighted Fusion rotor method for diagnosing faults based on DS evidence theory
CN112200244B (en) Intelligent detection method for anomaly of aerospace engine based on hierarchical countermeasure training
CN112036301B (en) Driving motor fault diagnosis model construction method based on intra-class feature transfer learning and multi-source information fusion
Afrasiabi et al. Real-time bearing fault diagnosis of induction motors with accelerated deep learning approach
CN113673346B (en) Motor vibration data processing and state identification method based on multiscale SE-Resnet
CN108920426B (en) A kind of method for diagnosing faults based on power equal operator and DS evidence theory
CN112257530A (en) Rolling bearing fault diagnosis method based on blind signal separation and support vector machine
CN111678699B (en) Early fault monitoring and diagnosing method and system for rolling bearing
Zhou et al. A multistage deep transfer learning method for machinery fault diagnostics across diverse working conditions and devices
CN112633098A (en) Fault diagnosis method and system for rotary machine and storage medium
CN113203954A (en) Battery fault diagnosis method based on time-frequency image processing
CN110059413B (en) Fault diagnosis method
CN114564987A (en) Rotary machine fault diagnosis method and system based on graph data
CN111428772B (en) Photovoltaic system depth anomaly detection method based on k-nearest neighbor adaptive voting
CN116400244B (en) Abnormality detection method and device for energy storage battery
CN111031042A (en) Network anomaly detection method based on improved D-S evidence theory
CN113449412B (en) Fault diagnosis method based on K-means clustering and comprehensive correlation
CN115860243A (en) Fault prediction method and system based on industrial Internet of things data
CN111506045B (en) Fault diagnosis method based on single-value intelligent set correlation coefficient
Arellano–Espitia et al. Anomaly detection in electromechanical systems by means of deep-autoencoder
CN116011507A (en) Rare fault diagnosis method for fusion element learning and graph neural network

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant