CN108398939B - Fault diagnosis method based on DS evidence theory - Google Patents
Fault diagnosis method based on DS evidence theory Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN108398939B CN108398939B CN201810169966.6A CN201810169966A CN108398939B CN 108398939 B CN108398939 B CN 108398939B CN 201810169966 A CN201810169966 A CN 201810169966A CN 108398939 B CN108398939 B CN 108398939B
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- fault
- triangular fuzzy
- fuzzy number
- probability distribution
- steps
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B23/00—Testing or monitoring of control systems or parts thereof
- G05B23/02—Electric testing or monitoring
- G05B23/0205—Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults
- G05B23/0218—Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults characterised by the fault detection method dealing with either existing or incipient faults
- G05B23/0243—Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults characterised by the fault detection method dealing with either existing or incipient faults model based detection method, e.g. first-principles knowledge model
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F30/00—Computer-aided design [CAD]
- G06F30/20—Design optimisation, verification or simulation
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B2219/00—Program-control systems
- G05B2219/20—Pc systems
- G05B2219/24—Pc safety
- G05B2219/24065—Real time diagnostics
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
- Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
- Geometry (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
- Test And Diagnosis Of Digital Computers (AREA)
Abstract
The invention provides a fault diagnosis method based on an evidence theory, and relates to the field of fault diagnosis. The method comprises the steps of establishing a triangular fuzzy model for each fault, establishing a triangular fuzzy model for data to be tested, generating a basic probability distribution function according to the overlapping degree between the model to be tested and the fault model, and fusing the basic probability distribution function generated under each fault by using an evidence theory combination rule to realize fault diagnosis. The invention realizes fault diagnosis by combining the evidence theory and the triangular fuzzy number, and has the advantage of simple calculation; the basic probability distribution function generation method provided by the invention can well realize the processing of fuzzy information; the fault diagnosis method provided by the invention can realize the fault diagnosis of the motor rotor.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to the field of fault diagnosis, in particular to a method for realizing fault diagnosis based on DS evidence theory.
Background
The fault diagnosis technology is an engineering science closely combined with actual production and is a product of modern production development. With the application of modern science and technology to equipment, the structure of the equipment is more and more complex, the function is more and more perfect, the automation degree is higher and higher, and various faults can occur to the equipment due to the influence of many unavoidable factors, so that the preset function is reduced or lost, and even serious or even catastrophic accidents can be caused.
The failure diagnosis technology is to grasp the operation state of the equipment during operation of the equipment or without detaching the equipment, and to determine whether the state of the object to be diagnosed is in an abnormal state or a failure state by analyzing and processing useful information obtained by testing the object to be diagnosed.
The information fusion technology is an information comprehensive processing technology which utilizes multi-source information in a synergistic mode to obtain more objective and more essential knowledge about objects or targets, and is one of key technologies of intelligent scientific research. Among many fusion models and methods, the D-S evidence theory algorithm is one of the most effective algorithms. Evidence theory broadens the Basic event space in probability theory into a power set of Basic events, also called recognition framework, on which a Basic probability assignment function (BPA) is built. In addition, the evidence theory also provides a Dempster combination rule which can realize evidence fusion without prior information. In particular, when BPA is only assigned on a single subset proposition of the recognition framework, BPA is transformed into probabilities in probability theory, and the fusion result of the combination rules is the same as Bayes' formula in probability theory. From this point of view, DS evidence theory can more effectively represent and process uncertain information than probability theory, and these characteristics make it widely used in the field of information fusion. Due to the fact that DS evidence theory has excellent performance in the aspect of uncertain knowledge representation, the theory and application of DS evidence theory are rapidly developed in recent years, and the DS evidence theory plays an important role in the aspects of multi-sensor information fusion, medical diagnosis, military command and target identification.
Evidence theory has many advantages, and the uncertain information appearing in the sensor signal of the equipment can be better processed when the evidence theory is applied to fault diagnosis.
Disclosure of Invention
In order to realize fault diagnosis, the invention provides a fault diagnosis method based on DS evidence theory. The fault diagnosis realized by the method can better process uncertain information in equipment sensor signals and accurately diagnose the motor rotor fault.
The technical scheme adopted by the invention for solving the technical problem comprises the following steps:
the method comprises the following steps: inputting fault sample data D of n faults and k characteristicsij(i ═ 1,2, …, n, j ═ 1,2, …, k), the fault features are features that can be used for fault classification, the fault sample data are measured values of fault features, a triangular fuzzy number model is built for each feature of each fault, and the identification framework is Θ ═ { F ═ F1,F2,...,FnThe triangular ambiguity number is a set of ambiguities over a given domain of discourse U, meaning that for any x ∈ U, there is a number μ (x) ∈ [0,1 ∈]Correspondingly, μ (x) is called the membership degree of x to U, μ is called the membership function of x, and the method for establishing the triangular fuzzy number model comprises the following steps:
will fail Fi(i ═ 1,2, …, n) sample data D for feature jijMinimum value minD ofijMean aveDijAnd maximum value maxDijRespectively as fault FiThe minimum value, the mean value and the maximum value of the feature j triangular fuzzy number model are determined as the fault FiThe triangular fuzzy number of feature j is
Step two: inputting k kinds of characteristic sample data T to be tested of equipment to be testedjAnd generating a triangular fuzzy number model, wherein the equipment to be tested is a motor rotor, and the method for establishing the triangular fuzzy number model comprises the following steps:
the characteristic j is sampled by the sample data T to be testedjMinimum value minT ofjMean aveTjAnd maximum value maxTjRespectively as the minimum value, the average value and the maximum value of the triangular fuzzy number model of the characteristic j to be measured, and then the triangular fuzzy number of the characteristic j to be measured is
Step three: matching the triangular fuzzy number model to be detected under the characteristic j with the fault triangular fuzzy number model to generate a basic probability distribution function mjThe basic probability distribution function is defined in evidence theory as for any one of the subsets A, m (A) E [0, 1] belonging to theta]And satisfyThen m is 2ΘA basic probability distribution function of wherein 2ΘIn order to identify the power set of the frame,the basic probability distribution function mjThe generation method comprises the following steps:
will be provided withAndcross area ofThe ratio of the areas under the curve is taken as the corresponding single subset element { FiThe confidence of } willIntersection area of multiple fault ambiguity numbers with feature jThe ratio of the areas under the curve is used as the reliability of the corresponding multi-subset element, and the single-subset element { F }iMeans that in step one if and only if the subset A contains the ith (i e [1, N ] in the recognition frame theta]) The element is that the subset A in the step one contains more than two elements in the identification frame theta, the Sum of the generated credibility is recorded as Sum, if Sum is more than or equal to 1, the generated credibility is normalized, and the normalization method comprises the following steps: if Sum<1, then m isj{F1,F2,…,FnIs updated to mj{F1,F2,…,Fn}+1-Sum;
Step four: sequentially fusing the k generated BPA by using evidence theory combination rules to obtain mFThe combination rule of the evidence theory isWherein the ratio of A to B,m1,m2two groups to be fused BPA, m is m1And m2The fused BPA, K is m1,m2The collision factor of (a) is determined,
step five: fusing the m obtained in the fourth step by using a Pistic probability transformation methodFConverting into probability distribution P, wherein the conversion method comprises the following steps:wherein
Step six: diagnosing the equipment fault according to the obtained probability distribution P, if P ({ F)iGet P ({ F) }) if the maximum probability in P is greater than 0.5i}) the category corresponding to the maximum probability is taken as the equipment fault diagnosis result.
The method has the advantages that the evidence theory and the triangular fuzzy number are combined to realize fault diagnosis, and the method has the advantage of simple calculation; the invention uses triangular fuzzy number to model the fault characteristics, thus solving the problem of representation of fuzzy information; the basic probability distribution function generation method provided by the invention can well realize the processing of fuzzy information; the fault diagnosis method provided by the invention can realize the fault diagnosis of the motor rotor.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a general flow chart of an implementation of the present invention.
FIG. 2 is a failure F1Feature 1 sample data D11。
FIG. 3 shows the data T to be measured for feature 11。
FIG. 4 shows a feature 1 to-be-tested triangular fuzzy model and a fault triangular fuzzy model.
Fig. 5 is an intersection region of two blur numbers.
Fig. 6 is an intersection region of three blur numbers.
Detailed Description
The invention is further illustrated with reference to the figures and examples. Given an example of a fault diagnosis for a rotor of an electric machine, experimental data are from [1]]。[1]In total, three faults are set, here F1,F2,F3There are four signature data for each fault, each containing five sets of 40 observations each. And selecting four groups of feature data of each feature of each fault as training samples to generate a fault triangular fuzzy number model. Selection of failure F3The remaining set of data for the four features, i.e., data not selected as training samples, is used asTest samples illustrating the implementation steps of the proposed fault diagnosis method.
The method comprises the following steps: inputting three-fault four-characteristic fault sample data Dij(i ═ 1,2, …,3, j ═ 1,2, …,4), the fault features are features that can be used for fault classification, the fault sample data are measured values of fault features, a triangular fuzzy number model is built for each feature of each fault, and the identification framework is Θ ═ { F ═ F1,F2,F3The triangular ambiguity number is a set of ambiguities over a given domain of discourse U, meaning that for any x ∈ U, there is a number μ (x) ∈ [0,1 ∈]Correspondingly, μ (x) is called the membership degree of x to U, μ is called the membership function of x, and the method for establishing the triangular fuzzy number model comprises the following steps:
we have a fault F1Feature 1 triangle fuzzy number establishment exemplifies a method for establishing a fault triangle fuzzy number model, and a fault F1Feature 1 feature data is shown in figure 2. Will fail F1Feature 1 sample data D11The minimum value 0.1518, the mean value 0.1614 and the maximum value 0.1820 of (A) are respectively taken as the fault FiThe minimum value, the mean value and the maximum value of the feature j triangular fuzzy number model are determined as the fault F1The triangular fuzzy number of feature 1 is
Step two: inputting sample data T with 4 characteristics to be tested of equipment to be testedj(j ═ 1,2, …,4), generating a triangular fuzzy number model, wherein the method for establishing the triangular fuzzy number model comprises the following steps:
the method for establishing the fuzzy number model of the triangle to be detected is described by taking the establishment of the fuzzy number of the triangle to be detected with the characteristic 1 as an example, and the characteristic data of the triangle to be detected is shown in figure 3. Sample data T to be tested of the feature 11The minimum value 0.3207, the mean value 0.3387 and the maximum value 0.3476 of the feature 1 to be tested are respectively used as the minimum value, the mean value and the maximum value of the triangular fuzzy number model of the feature 1 to be tested, and then the triangular fuzzy number of the feature 1 to be tested is the minimum value, the mean value and the maximum value
Step three: treat under the characteristic jMatching the triangle measuring fuzzy number model with the fault triangle fuzzy number model to generate a basic probability distribution function mjThe basic probability distribution function is defined in evidence theory as for any one of the subsets A, m (A) E [0, 1] belonging to theta]And satisfyThen m is 2ΘA basic probability distribution function of wherein 2ΘIn order to identify the power set of the frame,the basic probability distribution function mjThe generation method comprises the following steps:
will be provided withAndcross area ofThe ratio of the areas under the curve is taken as the corresponding single subset element { FiThe confidence of } willIntersection area of multiple fault ambiguity numbers with feature jThe ratio of the areas under the curve is used as the reliability of the corresponding multi-subset element, and the single-subset element { F }iMeans that in step one if and only if the subset A contains the ith (i e [1, N ] in the recognition frame theta]) The element is that the subset A in the step one contains more than two elements in the identification frame theta, the Sum of the generated credibility is recorded as Sum, if Sum is more than or equal to 1, the generated credibility is normalized, and the normalization method comprises the following steps: if Sum<1, then m isj{F1,F2,…,FnIs updated to mj{F1,F2,…,Fn}+1-Sum;
Let us take m1Production as an example illustrates the BPA production process:
(1) computingArea under the curve S ═ (0.3476-0.3207) × 1/2 ═ 0.0135;
(2)m1({F1}),m1({F2}),m1({F3}):
ComputingAndcross area ofThen
(3)m1({F1,F2}),m1({F1,F3}),m1({F2,F3}),m1({F1,F2,F3}):
(4) Since the Sum of the degrees of reliability Sum generated as described above is 0.2848, m is updated1({F1,F2,F3})=0+1-Sum=0.7152。
M can be generated by the same method2,m3,m4The results are as follows:
m2({F1})=0.0867,m2({F2})=0.2094,m2({F3})=0.3216,m2({F1,F2})=0.0365,m2({F1,F3})=0.0547,m2({F2,F3})=0.1694,m2({F1,F2,F3})=0.1217;
m3({F1})=0,m3({F2})=0,m3({F3})=0.4482,m3({F1,F2})=0,m3({F1,F3})=0,m3({F2,F3})=0,m3({F1,F2,F3})=0.5518;
m4({F1})=0,m4({F2})=0,m4({F3})=0.9745,m4({F1,F2})=0,m4({F1,F3})=0,m4({F2,F3})=0,m4({F1,F2,F3})=0.0255;
step four: sequentially fusing the 4 generated BPA by using evidence theory combination rules to obtain mFThe combination rule of the evidence theory isWherein the ratio of A to B,m1,m2two groups to be fused BPA, m is m1And m2The fused BPA, K is m1,m2The collision factor of (a) is determined,
the fusion result is: m isF({F1})=0.0013,mF({F2})=0.0031,mF({F3})=0.9898,mF({F1,F2})=0.0006,mF({F1,F3})=0.0008,mF({F2,F3})=0.0026,mF({F1,F2,F3})=0.0018;
Step five: fusing the m obtained in the fourth step by using a Pistic probability transformation methodFConverting into probability distribution P, wherein the conversion method comprises the following steps:wherein
Step six: diagnosing the equipment fault according to the obtained probability distribution P, if P ({ F)iGet P ({ F) }) if the maximum probability in P is greater than 0.5i}) the category corresponding to the maximum probability is used as the equipment fault diagnosis result;
the maximum probability in probability distribution P is P ({ F)3}) and P ({ F)3})>0.5, so the equipment failure is diagnosed as F3Consistent with the true fault type.
Reference to the literature
[1] Wencheng forest, xu dawn shore, multisource uncertain information fusion theory and applications [ M ] scientific press, 2012.
Claims (1)
1. A fault diagnosis method based on DS evidence theory is characterized by comprising the following steps:
the method comprises the following steps: inputting fault sample data D of n faults and k characteristicsij(i ═ 1,2, …, n, j ═ 1,2, …, k), the fault features are features that can be used for fault classification, the fault sample data are measured values of fault features, a triangular fuzzy number model is built for each feature of each fault, and the identification framework is Θ ═ { F ═ F1,F2,...,FnThe triangular ambiguity number is a set of ambiguities over a given domain of discourse U, meaning that for any x ∈ U, there is a number μ (x) ∈ [0,1 ∈]Correspondingly, μ (x) is called the membership degree of x to U, μ is called the membership function of x, and the method for establishing the triangular fuzzy number model comprises the following steps:
will fail Fi(i ═ 1,2, …, n) sample data D for feature jijMinimum value minD ofijMean aveDijAnd maximum valuemaxDijRespectively as fault FiThe minimum value, the mean value and the maximum value of the feature j triangular fuzzy number model are determined as the fault FiThe triangular fuzzy number of feature j is
Step two: inputting k kinds of characteristic sample data T to be tested of equipment to be testedjAnd generating a triangular fuzzy number model, wherein the equipment to be tested is a motor rotor, and the method for establishing the triangular fuzzy number model comprises the following steps:
the characteristic j is sampled by the sample data T to be testedjMinimum value minT ofjMean aveTjAnd maximum value maxTjRespectively as the minimum value, the average value and the maximum value of the triangular fuzzy number model of the characteristic j to be measured, and then the triangular fuzzy number of the characteristic j to be measured is
Step three: matching the triangular fuzzy number model to be detected under the characteristic j with the fault triangular fuzzy number model to generate a basic probability distribution function mjThe basic probability distribution function is defined in evidence theory as for any one of the subsets A, m (A) E [0, 1] belonging to theta]And satisfyThen m is 2ΘA basic probability distribution function of wherein 2ΘIn order to identify the power set of the frame,the basic probability distribution function mjThe generation method comprises the following steps:
will be provided withAndcross area ofThe ratio of the areas under the curve is taken as the corresponding single subset element { FiThe confidence of } willIntersection area of multiple fault ambiguity numbers with feature jThe ratio of the areas under the curve is used as the reliability of the corresponding multi-subset element, and the single-subset element { F }iMeans that in step one if and only if the subset A contains the ith (i e [1, N ] in the recognition frame theta]) The element is that the subset A in the step one contains more than two elements in the identification frame theta, the Sum of the generated credibility is recorded as Sum, if Sum is more than or equal to 1, the generated credibility is normalized, and the normalization method comprises the following steps:if Sum<1, then m isj{F1,F2,…,FnIs updated to mj{F1,F2,…,Fn}+1-Sum;
Step four: sequentially fusing the k generated BPA by using evidence theory combination rules to obtain mFThe combination rule of the evidence theory isWherein the ratio of A to B,m1,m2two groups to be fused BPA, m is m1And m2The fused BPA, K is m1,m2The collision factor of (a) is determined,
step five: fusing the m obtained in the fourth step by using a Pistic probability transformation methodFConverting into probability distribution P, wherein the conversion method comprises the following steps:wherein
Step six: diagnosing the equipment fault according to the obtained probability distribution P, if P ({ F)iGet P ({ F) }) if the maximum probability in P is greater than 0.5i}) the category corresponding to the maximum probability is taken as the equipment fault diagnosis result.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201810169966.6A CN108398939B (en) | 2018-03-01 | 2018-03-01 | Fault diagnosis method based on DS evidence theory |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201810169966.6A CN108398939B (en) | 2018-03-01 | 2018-03-01 | Fault diagnosis method based on DS evidence theory |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN108398939A CN108398939A (en) | 2018-08-14 |
CN108398939B true CN108398939B (en) | 2020-01-10 |
Family
ID=63091426
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN201810169966.6A Active CN108398939B (en) | 2018-03-01 | 2018-03-01 | Fault diagnosis method based on DS evidence theory |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN108398939B (en) |
Families Citing this family (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN109165632A (en) * | 2018-09-20 | 2019-01-08 | 上海电力学院 | A kind of equipment fault diagnosis method based on improvement D-S evidence theory |
CN111366884B (en) * | 2018-12-26 | 2023-05-16 | 西安西电高压开关有限责任公司 | Active electronic current transformer and laser life evaluation method and device thereof |
CN110059413B (en) * | 2019-04-19 | 2022-11-15 | 中国航空无线电电子研究所 | Fault diagnosis method |
CN110166437B (en) * | 2019-04-19 | 2020-05-19 | 杭州电子科技大学 | Method for selecting optimal strategy for moving target defense based on DS evidence reasoning |
CN111506994B (en) * | 2020-04-14 | 2022-02-25 | 西北工业大学 | Motor rotor fault diagnosis method based on intelligent set |
CN111506045B (en) * | 2020-04-24 | 2022-03-01 | 西北工业大学 | Fault diagnosis method based on single-value intelligent set correlation coefficient |
CN112949145A (en) * | 2021-03-31 | 2021-06-11 | 西南大学 | Transformer fault diagnosis method based on Duval Pentagons fault BPA function |
CN117171710A (en) * | 2023-11-02 | 2023-12-05 | 四川乐电新能源科技有限公司 | Fault diagnosis method and fault diagnosis device for power system |
Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2007297931A (en) * | 2006-04-28 | 2007-11-15 | Nissan Motor Co Ltd | Failure diagnosis device for exhaust emission control device for internal combustion engine |
CN102208028A (en) * | 2011-05-31 | 2011-10-05 | 北京航空航天大学 | Fault predicting and diagnosing method suitable for dynamic complex system |
CN102721941A (en) * | 2012-06-20 | 2012-10-10 | 北京航空航天大学 | Method for fusing and diagnosing fault information of circuit of electric meter on basis of SOM (self-organized mapping) and D-S (Dempster-Shafer) theories |
CN102968109A (en) * | 2012-12-03 | 2013-03-13 | 西南大学 | Safety instrument system based on D-S (Dempster/Shafer) evidence theory |
Family Cites Families (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN103577707A (en) * | 2013-11-15 | 2014-02-12 | 上海交通大学 | Robot failure diagnosis method achieved by multi-mode fusion inference |
-
2018
- 2018-03-01 CN CN201810169966.6A patent/CN108398939B/en active Active
Patent Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2007297931A (en) * | 2006-04-28 | 2007-11-15 | Nissan Motor Co Ltd | Failure diagnosis device for exhaust emission control device for internal combustion engine |
CN102208028A (en) * | 2011-05-31 | 2011-10-05 | 北京航空航天大学 | Fault predicting and diagnosing method suitable for dynamic complex system |
CN102721941A (en) * | 2012-06-20 | 2012-10-10 | 北京航空航天大学 | Method for fusing and diagnosing fault information of circuit of electric meter on basis of SOM (self-organized mapping) and D-S (Dempster-Shafer) theories |
CN102968109A (en) * | 2012-12-03 | 2013-03-13 | 西南大学 | Safety instrument system based on D-S (Dempster/Shafer) evidence theory |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN108398939A (en) | 2018-08-14 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN108398939B (en) | Fault diagnosis method based on DS evidence theory | |
Han et al. | An adaptive spatiotemporal feature learning approach for fault diagnosis in complex systems | |
Lei et al. | New clustering algorithm-based fault diagnosis using compensation distance evaluation technique | |
CN108520266B (en) | A kind of Time Domain Fusion method for diagnosing faults based on DS evidence theory | |
CN108446458B (en) | A kind of Weighted Fusion rotor method for diagnosing faults based on DS evidence theory | |
CN112200244B (en) | Intelligent detection method for anomaly of aerospace engine based on hierarchical countermeasure training | |
CN112036301B (en) | Driving motor fault diagnosis model construction method based on intra-class feature transfer learning and multi-source information fusion | |
Afrasiabi et al. | Real-time bearing fault diagnosis of induction motors with accelerated deep learning approach | |
CN113673346B (en) | Motor vibration data processing and state identification method based on multiscale SE-Resnet | |
CN108920426B (en) | A kind of method for diagnosing faults based on power equal operator and DS evidence theory | |
CN112257530A (en) | Rolling bearing fault diagnosis method based on blind signal separation and support vector machine | |
CN111678699B (en) | Early fault monitoring and diagnosing method and system for rolling bearing | |
Zhou et al. | A multistage deep transfer learning method for machinery fault diagnostics across diverse working conditions and devices | |
CN112633098A (en) | Fault diagnosis method and system for rotary machine and storage medium | |
CN113203954A (en) | Battery fault diagnosis method based on time-frequency image processing | |
CN110059413B (en) | Fault diagnosis method | |
CN114564987A (en) | Rotary machine fault diagnosis method and system based on graph data | |
CN111428772B (en) | Photovoltaic system depth anomaly detection method based on k-nearest neighbor adaptive voting | |
CN116400244B (en) | Abnormality detection method and device for energy storage battery | |
CN111031042A (en) | Network anomaly detection method based on improved D-S evidence theory | |
CN113449412B (en) | Fault diagnosis method based on K-means clustering and comprehensive correlation | |
CN115860243A (en) | Fault prediction method and system based on industrial Internet of things data | |
CN111506045B (en) | Fault diagnosis method based on single-value intelligent set correlation coefficient | |
Arellano–Espitia et al. | Anomaly detection in electromechanical systems by means of deep-autoencoder | |
CN116011507A (en) | Rare fault diagnosis method for fusion element learning and graph neural network |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PB01 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
GR01 | Patent grant |