CN108280596A - Learn quality assessment method - Google Patents
Learn quality assessment method Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN108280596A CN108280596A CN201810174054.8A CN201810174054A CN108280596A CN 108280596 A CN108280596 A CN 108280596A CN 201810174054 A CN201810174054 A CN 201810174054A CN 108280596 A CN108280596 A CN 108280596A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- student
- test
- learning
- study
- ability
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 238000001303 quality assessment method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 17
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 79
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 22
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 14
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 14
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 claims description 41
- 230000006399 behavior Effects 0.000 claims description 11
- 230000008450 motivation Effects 0.000 claims description 4
- 230000019771 cognition Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000000205 computational method Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000008451 emotion Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000000354 decomposition reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001483 mobilizing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012549 training Methods 0.000 description 1
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
- G06Q10/06393—Score-carding, benchmarking or key performance indicator [KPI] analysis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/10—Services
- G06Q50/20—Education
- G06Q50/205—Education administration or guidance
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Educational Administration (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Educational Technology (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Primary Health Care (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
The invention discloses a kind of study quality assessment method, the first step establishes different study attribute test dimensions and the corresponding test game of test dimension；Second step establishes the corresponding different test dimensions of different test components, test component, the corresponding different knowledge on testing points of test dimension and the corresponding corresponding fractional value of knowledge on testing point, establishes test exam pool；Third walks, specific manifestation of the teacher according to student in test is played, and the knowledge on testing point in control test exam pool executes evaluation and test to tested student, gives student's test score of corresponding knowledge on testing point；4th step is analyzed and is handled to student's evaluation result；5th step generates an ability optimized development suggestion report according to the evaluation result of student.The purpose of the present invention learns quality assessment method, the quality of the study for the student's various aspects that can be tested and assessed by teacher, and is compared by optimizing, and gives the corresponding Development of Students suggestion of parents of student, evaluating method is more scientific and reasonable, closing to reality.
Description
Technical field
The present invention relates to education sector more particularly to a kind of study quality assessment methods.
Background technology
According to policy for education, school's training objective as defined in course project, each section teaching purpose stated by teaching program is appointed
Business, content, are the basic foundations of learning evaluation, they are realized by the specific activity of the religion and student of teacher.
In evaluation procedure, if the activity decomposition of teachers and students at stem portion, and make evaluation criterion.According to these standard determinations teachers and students'
Whether activity deviates from correctly teaching track, deviates from policy for education and instructional objective, and whether there is or not completing comprehensively, each section's teaching is big
Purpose and task as defined in guiding principle, to ensure teaching always along be correctly oriented development.Learning evaluation is conducive to all types
School rectifies Guidelines and runs a school direction, by learning evaluation, can make Faculty and Students know teaching process as a result,
Feedback information is provided in time.Feedback information has important adjustment effect in teaching.Information engineering shows only to pass through
Feedback information adjusts behavior, is possible to reach certain target.Teacher obtains the feedback information of evaluation, can adjust in time
The teaching of oneself is diagnosed to be the problem of student exists in the study and difficulty；Can make the clear instructional objective of teacher and real
Existing degree, specifies the form taken in education activities and whether method may advantageously facilitate the realization of instructional objective, to be to change
Foundation is provided into teaching.Student obtains feedback information, can deepen the understanding to oneself current study condition, determines and is suitble to oneself
Learning objective, so as to adjust the study of oneself.Moreover it is possible to play the role of exciting Students Academic Motivation.Studies have shown that often
The test of record achievement is carried out to student, and is subject to evaluation appropriate, can effectively excite the learning interest of simultaneously mobilizing students,
Push classroom learning.
Then it is various to give student typically by the way of self judgment by marking for existing various evaluating methods
Evaluation, instruction of papil teacher etc., which is directed to different situations, improves learning strategy.It is exactly that student often exists to lead to a problem in this way
During self-appraisal, there are larger subjectivities, objective can not treat test and appraisal, meanwhile, existing assessment method is usually focused on managing
By test and appraisal, the behavior test and appraisal of students'learning are not focused on, test result is not practical enough.
Invention content
The purpose of the present invention is to solve the shortcomings of the prior art and a kind of study quality assessment method is provided, can pass through
The quality of the study of teacher's test and appraisal student's various aspects, and compared by optimizing, the corresponding Development of Students suggestion of parents of student is given,
Evaluating method is more scientific and reasonable, closing to reality.
In order to achieve the above objectives, the present invention is achieved through the following technical solutions.
It is opposite with test dimension to establish different study attribute test dimensions for a kind of study quality assessment method, the first step
The test game answered；
Second step establishes the corresponding different test dimensions of different test components, test component, the corresponding difference of test dimension
Knowledge on testing point and the corresponding corresponding fractional value of knowledge on testing point establish test exam pool；
Third walks, specific manifestation of the teacher according to student in test is played, the knowledge on testing point in control test exam pool,
Evaluation and test is executed to tested student, gives student's test score of corresponding knowledge on testing point；
4th step is analyzed and is handled to student's evaluation result；
5th step generates an ability optimized development suggestion report according to the evaluation result of student.
Further, the test component includes learning strategy, learning ability and team's quality；
The learning strategy refers to program, rule, method, skill and the regulation and control side that student effectively learns in learning activities
Formula, it, either interior hidden rule and policy, can also be outer aobvious operation sequence and step；
The learning ability refers to student and needs to complete required motivation when learning tasks in learning activities, and interest is hard
The ability for holding equal non-intelligent characters, is the power of life-long education；
Team's quality refer to the sense of community that student shows in team unity, using resource, quickly reach mesh
Target ability to lead.
Further, the learning strategy includes three dimensions, respectively planned, feasibility and feedback；
The planned plan and arrangement for referring to student before learning activities, including time, important order, learning activities
Sequentially；
The feasibility refer to student draw oneself up in learning activities execute study plan, exclusive PCR ensure study it is suitable
Profit carries out；
The feedback refers to student and oneself study condition and effect is checked, feeds back and evaluated after learning activities,
And it remedies in time and summing up experience.
Further, the learning ability includes three dimensions, respectively proactive, focus and Resilience；
The proactive is the characteristics of more the asking of thinking much that student shows in learning activities, is Learning Motive
Important behaviour；
The focus be student in learning activities to the input degree of learning tasks, be the important table of learning ability
It is existing；
The Resilience is sticking of the student to difficult challenge task in learning activities and rationally returning to failure
Cause is the important behaviour for learning willpower.
Further, team's quality includes three dimensions, respectively cooperation awareness, leading capacity quality, persuasive ability；
The cooperation awareness refers to cognition and emotion of the student to common action and its rule of conduct, is that cooperation behavior generates
A basic premise and important foundation；
The leading capacity quality be student showed in team learning activity make full use of resource to achieve the goal
Ability；
The persuasive ability is that student actively shows self in team learning activity, and fully persuades other people ability.
Further, student's evaluation result include to student the score Y (hundred-mark system score value) of each dimension meter
It calculates, calculates as follows；
The first step, calculates the standard scores Z of each dimension, and computational methods are：
Z=(x-M)/SD
Wherein：M is counting respectively for full class classmate；
SD is the standard deviation of full class classmate；
X is that this student tests score；
Second step, according to standard scores Z, query criteria gaussian distribution table finds the corresponding probability Ps of standard scores Z, wherein work as Z
When≤0, then Y=100P, as Z ＜ 0, then Y=100 (1-P).
Further, the ability optimized development suggestion report is determined according to the score Y of student's dimension, works as Y=84-100,
For superior level；Work as Y=50-83, is medium level；Work as Y=0-49, to wait improving the standard.
The purpose of the present invention learns quality assessment method, the quality of the study for the student's various aspects that can be tested and assessed by teacher,
And compared by optimizing, the corresponding Development of Students suggestion of parents of student is given, evaluating method is more scientific and reasonable, closing to reality.
Specific implementation mode
With reference to embodiment, the present invention will be further described, but is not limited to the content on specification.
Learn quality assessment method, it includes the following steps：
The first step establishes different study attribute test dimensions and the corresponding test game of test dimension；
Second step establishes the corresponding different test dimensions of different test components, test component, the corresponding difference of test dimension
Knowledge on testing point and the corresponding corresponding fractional value of knowledge on testing point establish test exam pool；
Third walks, specific manifestation of the teacher according to student in test is played, the knowledge on testing point in control test exam pool,
Evaluation and test is executed to tested student, gives student's test score of corresponding knowledge on testing point；
4th step is analyzed and is handled to the result of student's evaluation and test；
5th step generates an ability optimized development suggestion report according to the evaluation result of student.
It includes learning strategy, learning ability and team's quality to test component.
Learning strategy refers to program, rule, method, skill and the control methods that student effectively learns in learning activities.
It, either interior hidden rule and policy, can also be outer aobvious operation sequence and step.Including three dimensions, respectively plan
Property, feasibility and feedback.
It is planned：Refer to plan and arrangement of the student before learning activities, including time, important order, learning activities it is suitable
Sequence etc..
Feasibility：Finger student draws oneself up in learning activities executes study plan, and exclusive PCR ensures that study is smooth
It carries out.
Feedback：Refer to student oneself study condition and effect are checked, fed back and evaluated after learning activities, and and
When remedy and summing up experience.
Learning ability：Finger student needs to complete required motivation, interest when learning tasks in learning activities and adheres to
The ability of non-intelligent characters is the power of life-long education comprising three dimensions：Proactive, focus and Resilience.
Proactive：It is the characteristics of more the asking of thinking much that student shows in learning activities, is the weight of Learning Motive
It shows
Focus：Be student in learning activities to the input degree of learning tasks, be the important behaviour of learning ability
Resilience：It is sticking of the student to difficult challenge task in learning activities and the reasonable attribution to failure,
It is the important behaviour for learning willpower.
Team's quality：Refer to sense of community that student shows in team unity, using resource, quickly reach target
Ability to lead.Include mainly：Cooperation awareness, leading capacity quality, persuasive ability.
Cooperation awareness：Refer to cognition and emotion of the student to common action and its rule of conduct, is that cooperation behavior generates
One basic premise and important foundation.
Leading capacity quality：It is the energy for making full use of resource to achieve the goal that student shows in team learning activity
Power.
Persuasive ability：It is that student actively shows self in team learning activity, and fully persuades other people ability.
The knowledge on testing point and corresponding scores that wherein various dimensions include are as shown in the table：
According to evaluating result, student can be calculated in the score Y (hundred-mark system score value) of each dimension, calculated as follows：
The standard scores Z of each dimension is calculated, computational methods are：
Z=(x-M)/SD
Wherein：M：Full class classmate's counts respectively, M=(X1+X2+ ... xn)/n, i.e.,：The sum of score of complete her classmate of class/
The number of full class；
SD：The standard deviation SD=sqrt (((x1-M) of full class classmate^2+(x2-M)^2+......(xn-M)^2)/n), i.e.,：Entirely
The score (X) of each classmate of class subtracts full class and divides equally the sum of square of (M) divided by the evolution of full class classmate's number；
X：This classmate raw score, each topic score/topic numbers of x=；
After Z=(x-M)/SD obtains Z values, gaussian distribution table (attachment 1) is looked into, 0.00 arranges corresponding score * 100；If Z
For positive value, then corresponding P values * 100 is student's score；Such as z=1.9, corresponding score 0.97*100=97；If it is negative
Number, then classmate is scored at (1-P) * 100；If the corresponding scores of z=--1.9. are (1-0.97) * 100=3.
According to standard scores Z, query criteria gaussian distribution table finds the corresponding probability Ps of standard scores Z, wherein as Z≤0,
Then Y=100P, as Z ＜ 0, then Y=100 (1-P),
According to student in the score Y of each dimension, can be reported with generative capacity optimized development suggestion,
Wherein work as Y=84-100, is superior level；Work as Y=50-83, is medium level；Work as Y=0-49, for water to be improved
It is flat.
Each dimension of wherein learning strategy is described as follows shown in table：
Each dimension of learning ability is described as follows shown in table：
Each dimension of team's quality is described as follows shown in table：
Wherein, when respectively test dimension is superior level, ability optimized development suggestion is " to continue to keep current state, parent
Good communication is kept with child.It refuels！”
Each dimension be medium level or wait improve the standard formula when, ability optimized development is suggested such as following table：
The purpose of the present invention learns quality assessment method, the quality of the study for the student's various aspects that can be tested and assessed by teacher,
And compared by optimizing, the corresponding Development of Students suggestion of parents of student is given, evaluating method is more scientific and reasonable, closing to reality.
Obviously, the above embodiment of the invention be only to clearly illustrate example of the present invention, and not be
Restriction to embodiments of the present invention.For those of ordinary skill in the art, on the basis of the above description also
It can make other variations or changes in different ways.Here all embodiments can not be exhaustive.It is every to belong to this
Row of the obvious changes or variations that the technical solution of invention is extended out still in protection scope of the present invention.
Claims (7)
1. a kind of study quality assessment method, which is characterized in that it includes：
The first step establishes different study attribute test dimensions and the corresponding test game of test dimension；
Second step establishes the corresponding different test dimensions of different test components, test component, the corresponding different tests of test dimension
Knowledge point and the corresponding corresponding fractional value of knowledge on testing point establish test exam pool；
Third walks, specific manifestation of the teacher according to student in test is played, the knowledge on testing point in control test exam pool, to quilt
Test student executes evaluation and test, gives student's test score of corresponding knowledge on testing point；
4th step is analyzed and is handled to student's evaluation result；
5th step generates an ability optimized development suggestion report according to the evaluation result of student.
2. a kind of study quality assessment method according to claim 1, it is characterised in that：The test component includes study
Strategy, learning ability and team's quality；
The learning strategy refers to program, rule, method, skill and the control methods that student effectively learns in learning activities,
It is both interior hidden rule and policy, and aobvious outside operation sequence and step；
The learning ability refers to student and needs to complete required motivation when learning tasks in learning activities, and interest is adhered to non-
The ability of intelligence quality is the power of life-long education；
Team's quality refers to the sense of community that student shows in team unity, using resource, quickly reach target
Ability to lead.
3. a kind of study quality assessment method according to claim 2, it is characterised in that：The learning strategy includes three
Dimension, respectively planned, feasibility and feedback；
It is described it is planned refer to plan and arrangement of the student before learning activities, including time, important order, learning activities it is suitable
Sequence；
The feasibility refer to student draw oneself up in learning activities execute study plan, exclusive PCR ensure study smoothly into
Row；
The feedback refers to student and oneself study condition and effect is checked, feeds back and evaluated after learning activities, and and
When remedy and summing up experience.
4. a kind of study quality assessment method according to claim 2, it is characterised in that：The learning ability includes three
Dimension, respectively proactive, focus and Resilience；
The proactive is the characteristics of more the asking of thinking much that student shows in learning activities, is the important of Learning Motive
Performance；
The focus be student in learning activities to the input degree of learning tasks, be the important behaviour of learning ability；
The Resilience is sticking of the student to difficult challenge task in learning activities and the reasonable attribution to failure, is
Learn the important behaviour of willpower.
5. a kind of study quality assessment method according to claim 2, it is characterised in that：Team's quality includes three
Dimension, respectively cooperation awareness, leading capacity quality, persuasive ability；
The cooperation awareness refers to cognition and emotion of the student to common action and its rule of conduct, is the one of cooperation behavior generation
A premise and basis；
The leading capacity quality is the ability for making full use of resource to achieve the goal that student shows in team learning activity；
The persuasive ability is that student actively shows self in team learning activity, and fully persuades other people ability.
6. a kind of study quality assessment method according to claim 1, it is characterised in that：Student's evaluation result includes
To student in the calculating of the score Y (hundred-mark system score value) of each dimension, calculate as follows；
The first step, calculates the standard scores Z of each dimension, and computational methods are：
Z=(x-M)/SD
Wherein：M is counting respectively for full class classmate；
SD is the standard deviation of full class classmate；
X is that this student tests score；
Second step, according to standard scores Z, query criteria gaussian distribution table finds the corresponding probability Ps of standard scores Z, wherein when Z≤0
When, then Y=100P, as Z ＜ 0, then Y=100 (1-P).
7. a kind of study quality assessment method according to claim 1 or 6, it is characterised in that：The ability optimized development
It is recommended that report is determined according to the score Y of student's dimension, work as Y=84-100, is superior level；Work as Y=50-83, is medium level；
Work as Y=0-49, to wait improving the standard.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201810174054.8A CN108280596A (en) | 2018-03-02 | 2018-03-02 | Learn quality assessment method |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201810174054.8A CN108280596A (en) | 2018-03-02 | 2018-03-02 | Learn quality assessment method |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN108280596A true CN108280596A (en) | 2018-07-13 |
Family
ID=62809025
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201810174054.8A Pending CN108280596A (en) | 2018-03-02 | 2018-03-02 | Learn quality assessment method |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN108280596A (en) |
Cited By (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN110298599A (en) * | 2019-07-03 | 2019-10-01 | 广东倍智测聘网络科技股份有限公司 | A kind of talent's evaluating method and device |
| CN112926889A (en) * | 2021-03-31 | 2021-06-08 | 创壹（上海）信息科技有限公司 | Learning ability evaluation system and method for improving learning ability |
| CN113284623A (en) * | 2021-07-23 | 2021-08-20 | 北京智精灵科技有限公司 | Personalized cognitive training task recommendation algorithm and system based on user ability |
-
2018
- 2018-03-02 CN CN201810174054.8A patent/CN108280596A/en active Pending
Cited By (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN110298599A (en) * | 2019-07-03 | 2019-10-01 | 广东倍智测聘网络科技股份有限公司 | A kind of talent's evaluating method and device |
| CN112926889A (en) * | 2021-03-31 | 2021-06-08 | 创壹（上海）信息科技有限公司 | Learning ability evaluation system and method for improving learning ability |
| CN113284623A (en) * | 2021-07-23 | 2021-08-20 | 北京智精灵科技有限公司 | Personalized cognitive training task recommendation algorithm and system based on user ability |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Stohlmann | A vision for future work to focus on the “M” in integrated STEM | |
| CN108280596A (en) | Learn quality assessment method | |
| Navruz et al. | Would a STEM school ‘by any other name smell as sweet’? | |
| Grapin et al. | Beyond general-purpose talk moves | |
| Forgasz | Streaming for mathematics in Victorian secondary schools | |
| Jurado | Parental involvement impacting student academic success in AVID | |
| Rodgers et al. | Influence of teaching assistants' motivation on student learning | |
| Wylie | Undergraduate Research in Engineering | |
| Meng et al. | An effective blended online Political teaching and learning strategy during the COVID-19 pandemic | |
| Sun | Construction of the interactive educational knowledge graph and classification of student groups | |
| Hou et al. | Student offline classroom concentration identification research based on deep learning | |
| Feng et al. | Exploring the position of technology education in China | |
| Slattery et al. | Understanding how learners grapple with wicked problems in environmental science | |
| Tian | Research and development of NC intelligent online teaching system | |
| Hirsch Shanna et al. | International Portal of Teacher Education | |
| Xu et al. | Intelligent Control and the Transformation of Work Values of Skilled Workers | |
| Wegwert | Necessary But Not Sufficient: Deweyan Dialogue and the Demands of Critical Citizenship. A Book Review of The Political Classroom: Evidence and Ethics in Democratic Education | |
| Dawar | A Bot Assisted Instructional Framework for Teaching Introductory Programming Course (s). | |
| Xiaofang et al. | Design of 4P-BL Teaching Mode with Four Integration | |
| Burmester | Storylines in middle school | |
| Fickel et al. | Rapporteurs' report: What should initial teacher education programmes for 2022 look like and why? | |
| Yildirim-Erbasli et al. | Design and Evaluation of a Conversational Agent for Formative Assessment in Higher Education | |
| Xiaojing et al. | DEVELOPMENT OF CAREER PLANNING COURSE BASED ON THE EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING MODE TO CULTIVATE STUDENTS’WORK SKILL OF ZHOUKOU NORMAL UNIVERSITY | |
| Shi et al. | Study on the Cultivation Mode of training Innovative Entrepreneurship Talents in Sino-Foreign and Jointly-Run Schools Based on the Three elements & Three Tracks mode-Take Fuzhou Melbourne Polytechnic as an Example | |
| Yang | Exploration and Practical Analysis on the Training Mode of Excellent Program Talents for Safety Engineering Specialty |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |
Application publication date: 20180713 |
|
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |