CN108227679A - A kind of method for estimating state containing faulty gap Sandwich system - Google Patents

A kind of method for estimating state containing faulty gap Sandwich system Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN108227679A
CN108227679A CN201810030014.6A CN201810030014A CN108227679A CN 108227679 A CN108227679 A CN 108227679A CN 201810030014 A CN201810030014 A CN 201810030014A CN 108227679 A CN108227679 A CN 108227679A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
fault
state
observer
switching
formula
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
CN201810030014.6A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN108227679B (en
Inventor
周祖鹏
刘旭锋
甘良棋
张晓东
裴雨蒙
蒋开云
钟雪波
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Hefei Longzhi Electromechanical Technology Co ltd
Original Assignee
Guilin University of Electronic Technology
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Guilin University of Electronic Technology filed Critical Guilin University of Electronic Technology
Priority to CN201810030014.6A priority Critical patent/CN108227679B/en
Publication of CN108227679A publication Critical patent/CN108227679A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN108227679B publication Critical patent/CN108227679B/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B23/00—Testing or monitoring of control systems or parts thereof
    • G05B23/02—Electric testing or monitoring
    • G05B23/0205—Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults
    • G05B23/0218—Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults characterised by the fault detection method dealing with either existing or incipient faults
    • G05B23/0243—Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults characterised by the fault detection method dealing with either existing or incipient faults model based detection method, e.g. first-principles knowledge model
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B2219/00—Program-control systems
    • G05B2219/20—Pc systems
    • G05B2219/24—Pc safety
    • G05B2219/24065—Real time diagnostics

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
  • Feedback Control In General (AREA)
  • Testing And Monitoring For Control Systems (AREA)

Abstract

The invention discloses a kind of method for estimating state containing faulty gap Sandwich system, first with crucial separation principle and switching function, from simple to complex, the sandwich state space equation with dead zone, gap built is used for reference, structure can Non-smooth surface state space equation of the accurate description containing faulty gap Sandwich system；Secondly, according to structure Non-smooth surface state space equation, when system meets observer existence condition, structure can be with the switching proportion integral observer for changing between system work area and switching.This method have the advantage that：Such system is more accurately described by introducing switching function；Compared with traditional Proportional integral observer, the state and failure of more accurately estimating system are capable of using the observer of this method.

Description

State estimation method of gap sandwich system with fault
Technical Field
The invention belongs to the field of state estimation of nonlinear systems, and particularly relates to a state estimation method of a gap sandwich system with a fault.
Background
Backlash is typically present in gear mechanical transmission systems, electrically operated valves, digital circuits, sensors, hydraulic systems. For example, in a gear system, backlash between gear teeth can produce backlash. In practice, the gap does not exist alone, but is sandwiched between other links, i.e. the gap non-linearity is sandwiched between two linear dynamic subsystems, which can be described as a gap sandwich system. Faults often occur in mechanical and electronic systems. The presence of a fault may cause the system to deteriorate, vibrate, oscillate, and even become unstable. Therefore, in the actual controller design and fault tolerant control, it is important to accurately estimate the state and fault of the system.
Constructing a corresponding observer for a particular system has always been a research hotspot in the field of control engineering. The design theory and methodology for linear stationary system observers matured since the well-known Luenberger observer was proposed in the 70 s of this century d.j. But is different for the nonlinear system, firstly, the visibility of the nonlinear system is a local characteristic; secondly, the visibility of the linear system is independent of the system input and only depends on the structure of the system, while the visibility of the nonlinear system is not only related to the system structure but also related to the system input. Due to the complexity of the nonlinear system, it is difficult to find a unified observer constructing method for the nonlinear system, and a specific observer is often constructed for a certain type of nonlinear system. For example, morning light in 2017 and the like propose an extended state observer based on state compensation for a discrete system, which realizes more accurate state estimation and interference suppression. Soken H E in 2014 proposes a Lubang Kalman filtering method, and under the condition that a measuring system has faults, the attitude of the spacecraft is estimated. In 2015, an internal model observer is designed for a linear system with time delay by Efimov D and the like, and when a transfer function from fault input to error meets a specified H-infinity norm, the system is stable for dynamic estimation error.
Chinese patent CN105204332B discloses a state estimation method for a composite sandwich system containing dead zone and hysteresis based on a non-smooth observer. The invention estimates the state of the system under the condition that the sandwich system does not contain faults. However, in an actual system, a fault is often inevitable, and the state estimation of the system generates certain disturbance due to the existence of the fault, and even the estimation error is diverged, that is, the state of the system cannot be estimated. The invention also does not estimate system faults as the fault effects are ignored.
So far, no patent and literature has been found for simultaneously evaluating gap sandwich systems containing faults. The present invention proposes a new switching observer to do this. And introducing a switching item which can be switched along with the working interval of the system into the switching proportional-integral observer, and analyzing the state and the fault estimation error. And finally, giving the condition that the estimation error of the system state and the estimation error of the fault are bounded. The estimation effects of the switching proportional-integral observer and the conventional proportional-integral observer were compared by the embodiment. The results show that the switching proportional-integral observer is superior to the conventional proportional-integral observer. The state and fault estimates of the system may be used for future system control and fault tolerant control.
Disclosure of Invention
Aiming at the technical defects, the invention discloses a state estimation method for a gap sandwich system with faults based on a switching proportional-integral observer, the switching proportional-integral observer provided by the method comprises a switching vector which can change along with a system working interval, and compared with a traditional observer, the observer adopting the method can more accurately estimate the state and the faults of the system.
The technical scheme for realizing the purpose of the invention is as follows:
a method of estimating a state of a gap sandwich system including a fault, comprising the steps of:
step 1: constructing a non-smooth state space equation capable of accurately describing the gap sandwich system with the fault by using a key item separation principle and a switching function;
step 2: and (2) constructing a non-smooth state space equation of the clearance sandwich system containing the fault according to the step 1, constructing a switching proportional-integral observer capable of automatically switching along with the change of the working interval of the clearance sandwich system containing the fault when the system meets the existence condition of the observer, and giving the existence condition and the boundedness theorem of the corresponding switching proportional-integral observer.
The step 1 comprises the following steps:
(1) front-end linear subsystem L with faulty gap sandwich system1The state space equation of (a) is:
(2) back end linear subsystem L with faulty gap sandwich system2The state space equation of (a) is:
the above formula (1) and formula (2)u∈R1 ×1，y∈R1×1，f∈R1×1，uf∈R1×1，af∈R1×1，bf∈R1×1，i＝1，2，x1iAnd x2iEach represents L1And L2In the (i) th state of (c),in order to be a state transition matrix,in order to input the matrix, the input matrix is,to be the output matrix, the output matrix is,for the failure matrix, u ∈ R1×1As input, y ∈ R1×1For output, f ∈ R1×1Is a fault of the system, can be regarded asfAs a factor of a failed link, bfInput coefficient for faulty link, uf∈R1×1For a failed link that is the input to the failed link, assume ufIs bounded, afIs less than 1, i.e. | af|<1, so the fault system is stable according to the linear system stability condition; n isiDimension of the ith linear system; is provided withAnd is
(3) The state space equation for the clearance subsystem:
in gap sandwich systems with faults, v1(k) And v2(k) Defining intermediate variables m (k) as the input and output of the interval respectively:
defining an intermediate variable w1(k) Comprises the following steps:
w1(k)＝m(k)(v1(k)-D1g1(k)+D2g2(k))， (4)
wherein,
and is
The input-output relationship according to the gap can be:
v2(k)＝w1(k)+[v2(k-1)-w1(k)]g3(k)＝(1-g3(k))w1(k)+g3(k)v2(k-1)， (5)
whereinAccording to the formula (2), the formula (4) and the formula (5):
(4) the overall equation of state for the gap sandwich system containing the fault:
according to the formulae (1), (2), (6), and x1n1(k)＝v1(k) The state space equation of the system can be obtained as follows:
wherein
Wherein,
according to the characteristics of the system, only the output y (k) can be directly measured, so thatWherein0 is a zero matrix of the corresponding order Then
Wherein h isiIs the switching vector due to the presence of the gap.
The step 2 comprises the following steps:
(1) modeling of switching proportional-integral observer
According to the formula (8) in the step 1, a switching proportional integral observer shown as the following formula is established:
wherein
Andthe ith working interval is proportional gain and integral gain respectively, x (k), y (k), f (k), hiWherein when i is j, j is 1,3,when the j is 2, the sum of the j,
(2) estimation error analysis of proportional-integral observer
From the formula (9) and the formula (1), the following formula (10) and formula (11) can be obtained:
f(k+1)＝aff(k)+bfuf(k) (11)
equation (11) is subtracted from equation (10), andandthen:
subtracting equation (8) from equation (9) and considering the interval estimation error is:
e(k+1)＝(A-KpjC)e(k)+Def(k)+Δηos+ΔAosx(k)。 (13)
definition ofΔAos＝Aj-Ai，
From equations (12) and (13), the state and fault estimation errors can be found as:
definition ofAnd isThen it can be obtained:
et(k+1)＝Aejet(k)+Δt(k)。 (15)
let Δt(k) And initial estimation error et(1) The norm of (a) is bounded and all are less than phidI.e. phid(||Δt(k)||≤φdAnd | | | e (1) | | is less than or equal to phi |d) When j is 1, 2, 3, an appropriate K is selectedpjAnd KijSo that A isejIs within the unit circle, the norms of the state and fault estimation errors are bounded and both are less thanTherefore, the condition that the switching proportional-integral observer has a bounded system state estimation error and fault estimation error is AejIs within the unit circle.
The invention has the beneficial effects that: according to the state estimation method of the gap sandwich system with the fault, which is provided by the invention, the gap sandwich system with the fault can be more accurately described by introducing the switching function, the model precision is higher, and compared with the traditional proportional-integral observer, the proportional-integral observer constructed by adopting the method can more accurately estimate the state and the fault of the system.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a gap sandwich system containing a fault;
FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of a servo hydraulic system;
FIG. 3 is a state result diagram of a switching proportional-integral observer under a step fault;
FIG. 4 is a state result diagram of a conventional proportional-integral observer under a step fault;
FIG. 5 is a comparison diagram of state errors of a switching proportional-integral observer and a conventional proportional-integral observer under a step fault;
FIG. 6 is a comparison graph of the fault estimation of the switching proportional-integral observer and the conventional proportional-integral observer under the condition of step fault;
FIG. 7 is a state result diagram of a switching proportional-integral observer under a sinusoidal fault with attenuated amplitude;
FIG. 8 is a state result diagram of a conventional proportional-integral observer under a sinusoidal fault with attenuated amplitude;
FIG. 9 is a comparison diagram of state errors of a switching proportional-integral observer and a conventional proportional-integral observer under a sinusoidal fault with attenuated amplitude;
fig. 10 is a comparison graph of the fault estimation of the switching proportional-integral observer and the conventional proportional-integral observer under the sinusoidal fault with the amplitude attenuation.
Detailed description of the preferred embodiments
The invention is further illustrated but not limited by the following figures and examples.
Example (b):
a method of estimating a state of a gap sandwich system including a fault, comprising the steps of:
step 1: constructing a non-smooth state space equation capable of accurately describing the gap sandwich system with the fault by using a key item separation principle and a switching function;
step 2: and (2) constructing a non-smooth state space equation of the clearance sandwich system containing the fault according to the step 1, constructing a switching proportional-integral observer capable of automatically switching along with the change of the working interval of the clearance sandwich system containing the fault when the system meets the existence condition of the observer, and giving the existence condition and the boundedness theorem of the corresponding switching proportional-integral observer.
The step 1 comprises the following steps:
(1) front-end linear subsystem L with faulty gap sandwich system1The state space equation of (a) is:
(2) back end linear subsystem L with faulty gap sandwich system2The state space equation of (a) is:
the above formula (1) and formula (2)u∈R1 ×1，y∈R1×1，f∈R1×1，uf∈R1×1，af∈R1×1,bf∈R1×1,i＝1，2，x1iAnd x2iEach represents L1And L2In the (i) th state of (c),in order to be a state transition matrix,in order to input the matrix, the input matrix is,to be the output matrix, the output matrix is,for the failure matrix, u ∈ R1×1As input, y ∈ R1×1For output, f ∈ R1×1Is a fault of the system, can be regarded asfAs a factor of a failed link, bfInput coefficient for faulty link, uf∈R1×1For a failed link that is the input to the failed link, assume ufIs bounded, afIs less than 1, i.e. | af|<1, so the fault system is stable according to the linear system stability condition; n isiDimension of the ith linear system; is provided withAnd is
(3) The state space equation for the clearance subsystem:
in a gap-containing sandwich system with a fault, v is shown in FIG. 11(k) And v2(k) Defining intermediate variables m (k) as the input and output of the interval respectively:
defining an intermediate variable w1(k) Is composed of
w1(k)＝m(k)(v1(k)-D1g1(k)+D2g2(k))， (4)
Wherein,
and is
The input-output relationship according to the gap can be:
v2(k)＝w1(k)+[v2(k-1)-w1(k)]g3(k)＝(1-g3(k))w1(k)+g3(k)v2(k-1)， (5)
whereinThe following formula (2), formula (4) and formula (5) can be obtained:
(4) the overall equation of state for the gap sandwich system containing the fault:
according to the formulae (1), (2), (6), and x1n1(k)＝v1(k) The state space equation of the system can be obtained as follows:
wherein
Wherein,
according to the characteristics of the system, only the output y (k) can be directly measured, so thatWherein0 is a zero matrix of the corresponding order Then
η thereiniIs the switching vector due to the presence of the gap.
The step 2 comprises the following steps:
(1) modeling of switching proportional-integral observer
According to the formula (8) in the step 1, a switching proportional integral observer shown as the following formula is established:
wherein
Andthe ith working interval is proportional gain and integral gain respectively, x (k), y (k), f (k), ηiWherein when i is j, j is 1,3,when the j is 2, the sum of the j,
(2) estimation error analysis of proportional-integral observer
From the formula (9) and the formula (1), the following formula (10) and formula (11) can be obtained:
f(k+1)＝aff(k)+bfuf(k) (11)
equation (11) is subtracted from equation (10), andandthen
Subtracting equation (8) from equation (9) and considering the interval estimation error is:
e(k+1)＝(A-KpjC)e(k)+Def(k)+Δηos+ΔAosx(k) (13)
definition ofΔAos＝Aj-Ai，
From equations (12) and (13), the state and fault estimation errors can be found as:
definition ofAnd isThen it can be obtained:
et(k+1)＝Aejet(k)+Δt(k) (13)
let Δt(k) And initial estimation error et(1) The norm of (a) is bounded and all are less than phidI.e. phid(||Δt(k)||≤φdAnd | | | e (1) | | is less than or equal to phi |d) When j is 1, 2, 3, an appropriate K is selectedpjAnd KijSo that A isejIs within the unit circle, the norms of the state and fault estimation errors are bounded and both are less thanThe condition existing in the proportional-integral observer, i.e. the condition that the system state estimation error and the fault estimation error are bounded, is aejIs within the unit circle.
Taking the servo hydraulic system shown in fig. 2 as an example, in the servo hydraulic system shown in fig. 2, the dc motor can be regarded as a front-end linear subsystem L1The load can be regarded as a back-end linear subsystem L2The gear transmission system composed of the components such as the gear, the screw rod and the nut has the clearance characteristic BL, so that the servo hydraulic system can be regarded as a clearance sandwich system. In practical applications, the effect of the servo hydraulic system is mainly a force amplification. The input signal u (t) of the system in the simulation is 2sin (0.4 pi t), the sampling time of the first fault and the second fault is 120s and 240s respectively, the sampling period is 0.01s, and all initial values of the state and the fault are set to be 0.
Linear subsystem L1：
Linear subsystem L2:
Gap BL:
x11representing the angular velocity of rotation of the main valve, in rad/s,
x12representing the main valve rotation angle in rad, corresponding to v in FIG. 21，
x21Representing the moving speed of the piston, with the unit of m/s,
x22and represents the piston movement displacement in m, corresponding to y in fig. 2.
Thus, from equations (6) and (14), the corresponding matrices can be derived as follows:
the traditional proportional-integral observer considers the gap as a proportional link and ignores the switching of the system, so that the traditional proportional-integral observer does not comprise a switching term, and a specific expression is as follows:
two types of faults are simulated respectively. The first type of fault, assuming that there is a step fault at 30s, represents a sudden fault, Af is 0.85, bf is 1, and when t is 0 ≦ t ≦ 30, uf(t) 0, i.e. no fault for the first 30 seconds; when 30 is turned into<When t is less than or equal to 120, uf(t) is 0.2, the sampling frequency is 100Hz, and Kpj is selected to be [1.5532, 0.7079, 1.9574, 0.5045 ] according to the observer existence theorem]T，KijWhen j is 1,3, the characteristic value of Ae is [0.4520, 0.5358, 0.9061, 0.9417, 0.9899]T(ii) a When j is 2, the characteristic value of Ae is [0.9900, 0.4500, 0.9900, 0.5517, 0.8438%]TAll within the unit circle.
The second type of fault is a sinusoidal signal with attenuated amplitude, which in practical applications represents a slowly varying fault. af is 0.99 and bf is 1. When t is more than or equal to 0 and less than or equal to 30, uf(t) ═ 0, i.e., the first 30 seconds were without failure. When 30 is turned into<When t is less than or equal to 240, the fault is uf(t)＝0.05e(-(t-30)/100)sin (π (t-30)/50+ 1). The sampling frequency is also 100 Hz. The materials are selected from Kpj ═ 1.5532, 0.7079, 1.9574,0.5045]T，Kij1. When j is 1,3, the characteristic value of Ae is [0.4520, 0.5358, 0.9061, 0.9417, 0.9899]T(ii) a When j is 2, the characteristic value of Ae is [0.9900, 0.4500, 0.9900, 0.5517, 0.8438%]TAll within the unit circle.
By comparing fig. 3 and 4, it can be clearly seen that the switching proportional-integral observer can estimate the state of the system more accurately than the conventional proportional-integral observer; the switching proportional-integral observer and conventional observer state estimation errors are shown in fig. 5, from which fig. 5 it can be derived that the estimation errors of the switching proportional-integral observer are smaller than those of the conventional proportional-integral observer. When there is a step fault at 30s, the state estimation effect of the switching proportional-integral observer and the conventional observer is shown in fig. 3 and 4, and the fault estimation effect of the switching proportional-integral observer and the conventional observer is shown in fig. 6, and it can be seen from fig. 6 that the switching proportional-integral observer can accurately track the fault signal in time. However, the conventional proportional-integral observer cannot track the fault signal at all, and in short, the switching proportional-integral observer has better performance than the conventional proportional-integral observer in the aspects of state estimation and fault estimation.
When the fault is a sinusoidal signal with attenuated amplitude, the state estimation effects of the switching proportional-integral observer and the conventional observer are as shown in fig. 7 and 8. By analogy with fig. 3-6, it can be seen from fig. 7-10 that the switching proportional-integral observer is more accurate than the conventional observer model, and therefore, the switching proportional-integral observer is more effective than the conventional observer state estimation.

Claims (3)

1. A method for estimating a state of a gap sandwich system including a fault, comprising the steps of:
step 1: constructing a non-smooth state space equation capable of accurately describing the gap sandwich system with the fault by using a key item separation principle and a switching function;
step 2: and (2) constructing a non-smooth state space equation of the clearance sandwich system containing the fault according to the step 1, constructing a switching proportional-integral observer capable of automatically switching along with the change of the working interval of the clearance sandwich system containing the fault when the system meets the existence condition of the observer, and giving the existence condition and the boundedness theorem of the corresponding switching proportional-integral observer.
2. The method according to claim 1, wherein step 1 comprises the steps of:
(1) front-end linear subsystem L with faulty gap sandwich system1The state space equation of (a) is:
(2) back end linear subsystem L with faulty gap sandwich system2The state space equation of (a) is:
the above formula (1) and formula (2)u∈R1×1，y∈R1×1，f∈R1×1，uf∈R1×1，af∈R1×1，bf∈R1×1，i＝1，2，x1iAnd x2iEach represents L1And L2In the (i) th state of (c),in order to be a state transition matrix,in order to input the matrix, the input matrix is,to be the output matrix, the output matrix is,for the failure matrix, u ∈ R1×1As input, y ∈ R1×1For output, f ∈ R1×1Is a fault of the system, can be regarded asfAs a factor of a failed link, bfInput coefficient for faulty link, uf∈R1×1For a failed link that is the input to the failed link, assume ufIs bounded, afIs less than 1, i.e. | af|<1, so the fault system is stable according to the linear system stability condition; n isiDimension of the ith linear system; is provided withAnd is
(3) The state space equation for the clearance subsystem:
in gap sandwich systems with faults, v1(k) And v2(k) Defining intermediate variables m (k) as the input and output of the interval respectively:
defining an intermediate variable w1(k) Comprises the following steps:
w1(k)＝m(k)(v1(k)-D1g1(k)+D2g2(k))， (4)
wherein,
and is
The input-output relationship according to the gap can be:
v2(k)＝w1(k)+[v2(k-1)-w1(k)]g3(k)＝(1-g3(k))w1(k)+g3(k)v2(k-1)， (5)
whereinAccording to the formula (2), the formula (4) and the formula (5):
(4) the overall equation of state for the gap sandwich system containing the fault:
according to the formulae (1), (2), (6), andthe state space equation of the system can be obtained as follows:
wherein
Wherein,
according to the characteristics of the system, only the output y (k) can be directly measured, so thatWherein0 is a zero matrix of the corresponding order Then
Wherein h isiIs the switching vector due to the presence of the gap.
3. The method according to claim 1, wherein step 2 comprises the steps of:
(1) modeling of switching proportional-integral observer
According to the formula (8) in the step 1, a switching proportional integral observer shown as the following formula is established:
wherein
Andthe ith working interval is proportional gain and integral gain respectively, x (k), y (k), f (k)、hiWherein when i is j, j is 1,3,when the j is 2, the sum of the j,
(2) estimation error analysis of proportional-integral observer
From the formula (9) and the formula (1), the following formula (10) and formula (11) can be obtained:
f(k+1)＝aff(k)+bfuf(k) (11)
equation (11) is subtracted from equation (10), andandthen:
subtracting equation (8) from equation (9) and considering the interval estimation error is:
e(k+1)＝(A-KpjC)e(k)+Def(k)+Δηos+ΔAosx(k) (13)
definition ofΔAos＝Aj-Ai，
From equations (12) and (13), the state and fault estimation errors can be found as:
definition ofAnd isThen it can be obtained:
et(k+1)＝Aejet(k)+Δt(k) (15)
let Δt(k) And initial estimation error et(1) The norm of (a) is bounded and all are less than phidI.e. phid(||Δt(k)||≤φdAnd | | | e (1) | | is less than or equal to phi |d) When j is 1, 2, 3, an appropriate K is selectedpjAnd KijSo that A isejIs within the unit circle, the norms of the state and fault estimation errors are bounded and both are less thanThe condition for the switching proportional-integral observer to exist, i.e. the condition that the system state estimation error and the fault estimation error are bounded, is aejIs within the unit circle.
CN201810030014.6A 2018-01-12 2018-01-12 State estimation method of gap sandwich system with fault Active CN108227679B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201810030014.6A CN108227679B (en) 2018-01-12 2018-01-12 State estimation method of gap sandwich system with fault

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201810030014.6A CN108227679B (en) 2018-01-12 2018-01-12 State estimation method of gap sandwich system with fault

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN108227679A true CN108227679A (en) 2018-06-29
CN108227679B CN108227679B (en) 2020-06-05

Family

ID=62640731

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201810030014.6A Active CN108227679B (en) 2018-01-12 2018-01-12 State estimation method of gap sandwich system with fault

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN108227679B (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN110209148A (en) * 2019-06-18 2019-09-06 江南大学 A kind of Fault Estimation method of the networked system based on description systematic observation device
CN112731809A (en) * 2020-12-21 2021-04-30 桂林电子科技大学 State and fault estimation method for dead zone sandwich system
CN112987683A (en) * 2021-01-08 2021-06-18 桂林电子科技大学 Fault positioning method for dead zone non-smooth sandwich system

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN101481019A (en) * 2009-02-20 2009-07-15 华中科技大学 Fault tolerant observing method of sensor for satellite attitude control system
JP4479824B2 (en) * 2008-04-24 2010-06-09 パナソニック電工株式会社 Operation terminal
CN101881968A (en) * 2009-05-05 2010-11-10 同济大学 Equipment fault diagnosis method based on model
CN105204332A (en) * 2015-08-10 2015-12-30 桂林电子科技大学 State estimation method for composite sandwich system with dead zone and hysteresis on the basis of non-smooth observer

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP4479824B2 (en) * 2008-04-24 2010-06-09 パナソニック電工株式会社 Operation terminal
CN101481019A (en) * 2009-02-20 2009-07-15 华中科技大学 Fault tolerant observing method of sensor for satellite attitude control system
CN101881968A (en) * 2009-05-05 2010-11-10 同济大学 Equipment fault diagnosis method based on model
CN105204332A (en) * 2015-08-10 2015-12-30 桂林电子科技大学 State estimation method for composite sandwich system with dead zone and hysteresis on the basis of non-smooth observer

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN110209148A (en) * 2019-06-18 2019-09-06 江南大学 A kind of Fault Estimation method of the networked system based on description systematic observation device
CN112731809A (en) * 2020-12-21 2021-04-30 桂林电子科技大学 State and fault estimation method for dead zone sandwich system
CN112987683A (en) * 2021-01-08 2021-06-18 桂林电子科技大学 Fault positioning method for dead zone non-smooth sandwich system
CN112987683B (en) * 2021-01-08 2022-02-18 桂林电子科技大学 Fault positioning method for dead zone non-smooth sandwich system

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN108227679B (en) 2020-06-05

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN107561935B (en) Motor position servo system friction compensation control method based on multilayer neural network
CN108227679B (en) State estimation method of gap sandwich system with fault
Jianyong et al. Robust control for static loading of electro-hydraulic load simulator with friction compensation
Yao et al. RISE-based adaptive control of hydraulic systems with asymptotic tracking
Yao et al. Adaptive control of hydraulic actuators with LuGre model-based friction compensation
CN108228975B (en) Motor servo system parameter identification method and backlash elimination control method
Zheng et al. On stability analysis of active disturbance rejection control for nonlinear time-varying plants with unknown dynamics
CN110209148B (en) Fault estimation method of networked system based on description system observer
CN108762096A (en) A kind of control-moment gyro frame system Disturbance Rejection method cascading extended state observer based on Discrete Nonlinear
CN113146640A (en) Mechanical arm distributed optimal fault-tolerant control method considering actuator faults
CN109426150B (en) Load simulator backstepping control method based on extended state observer
CN110081046A (en) A kind of more electro-hydraulic servo actuators tracking synchronisation control means based on Reverse Step Control
CN113341733B (en) Linear motor system fault and unknown disturbance compensation method
CN112643670B (en) Flexible joint control method based on sliding-mode observer
CN108536185B (en) Double-framework magnetic suspension CMG framework system parameter optimization method based on reduced-order cascade extended state observer
Cavallo et al. High-order sliding control of mechanical systems: theory and experiments
CN110107563A (en) There are electro-hydraulic servo actuators more in the case of load disturbance to be distributed cooperative control method
AL-Samarraie A chattering free sliding mode observer with application to DC motor speed control
CN110647111A (en) Output-discreteness-considered non-linear active disturbance rejection control method for electro-hydraulic servo system
CN108279569B (en) State estimation method for hysteresis sandwich system with fault
CN110000788A (en) Finite time fault tolerant control method for remote operating system
CN117506896A (en) Control method for single-connecting-rod mechanical arm embedded with direct-current motor
Susanto et al. Adaptive friction compensation: application to a robotic manipulator
CN115236990A (en) Generalized estimator, generalized interference rejection controller and design method
Boker et al. Control of flexible joint manipulators using only motor position feedback: A separation principle approach

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant
TR01 Transfer of patent right

Effective date of registration: 20240126

Address after: 230000 B-2704, wo Yuan Garden, 81 Ganquan Road, Shushan District, Hefei, Anhui.

Patentee after: HEFEI LONGZHI ELECTROMECHANICAL TECHNOLOGY Co.,Ltd.

Country or region after: China

Address before: 541004 1 Jinji Road, Guilin, the Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region

Patentee before: GUILIN University OF ELECTRONIC TECHNOLOGY

Country or region before: China

TR01 Transfer of patent right