CN108170898B - Lower limit method for reliability analysis of jointed rock slope - Google Patents
Lower limit method for reliability analysis of jointed rock slope Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN108170898B CN108170898B CN201711276041.3A CN201711276041A CN108170898B CN 108170898 B CN108170898 B CN 108170898B CN 201711276041 A CN201711276041 A CN 201711276041A CN 108170898 B CN108170898 B CN 108170898B
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- rock slope
- jointed rock
- reliability
- lower limit
- slope
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F30/00—Computer-aided design [CAD]
- G06F30/20—Design optimisation, verification or simulation
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F30/00—Computer-aided design [CAD]
- G06F30/10—Geometric CAD
- G06F30/13—Architectural design, e.g. computer-aided architectural design [CAAD] related to design of buildings, bridges, landscapes, production plants or roads
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F2119/00—Details relating to the type or aim of the analysis or the optimisation
- G06F2119/06—Power analysis or power optimisation
Abstract
The invention discloses a lower limit method for reliability analysis of a jointed rock slope, which comprises the following steps: step 1, drawing up basic information of the jointed rock slope according to the actual situation of the jointed rock slope; step 2, generating a Monte Carlo random number of the shearing resistance parameter of the structural surface; step 3, establishing a lower limit method random planning model for solving the reliability of the jointed rock slope; step 4, solving numerical values of a lower limit method random programming model for calculating the reliability of the jointed rock slope to obtain a limit state function of the jointed rock slope; and 5, calculating the reliability of the jointed rock slope according to the result of the step 4. The method adopts the Monte Carlo method to solve the random programming problem, and has the characteristics of high precision, high calculation speed and the like; the method solves the linear programming problem by adopting a simplex method, and the calculation program is simple to program.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to a lower limit method for reliability analysis of jointed rock slopes, and belongs to the technical field of reliability analysis of rock slope engineering.
Background
Slope stability analysis of jointed rock slopes is always a research hotspot of the geotechnical engineering community, and the safety factor or the limit load of the slopes is generally solved to predict the safety degree of the slopes. Slope stability analysis methods can be generally classified into deterministic analysis methods in which all parameters are calculated using a certain value, and non-deterministic analysis methods in which some calculation parameters are calculated using random variables. As is known, many calculation parameters of the rock slope are uncertain, that is, any property of the actual engineering slope has no unique certainty, such as rock mass volume weight, distribution of joints, shear strength of rock mass materials, groundwater level and the like, and the parameters have great uncertainty and variability; the definite values used by our conventional calculations are generally difficult to represent the true values of the parameters. Therefore, the development of the stochastic numerical computation method and the improvement of the computer performance have been paid more and more attention to the reliability analysis of the side slope by engineers.
In the research results of the reliability analysis method of the current jointed rock slope, the method mainly comprises two categories: one is reliability analysis based on the limit balance method, and the other is reliability analysis based on the finite element method. The extreme balance method has the characteristics of simple concept, high calculation efficiency and convenient engineering application, and particularly, some extreme balance methods have calculation expressions with explicit safety factors, and the deficiency is that the position of a sliding surface must be assumed in advance. The finite element method has stronger universality than a limit balance method, can be suitable for complicated slope stability analysis, can obtain stress strain distribution of the slope, and can obtain a more reasonable result by adopting the slope reliability analysis of the finite element method; but the defects are that the constitutive equation of the material is imperfect, and the calculation is large and the calculation efficiency is low.
When the reliability of the side slope is analyzed, the method for analyzing the stability of the side slope comprises the following steps: the random simulation methods matched with the limit balance method and the finite element method include Monte Carlo simulation, importance sampling simulation and the like, and the random simulation methods can be suitable for complex function functions and can solve complex problems of high latitude, so the methods are widely applied to reliability analysis of slopes.
In the geotechnical engineering ultimate bearing capacity analysis, an ultimate analysis lower limit method is an efficient solving tool, a static allowable stress field of a geotechnical body can be established according to a lower limit theorem, and a mathematical programming method is adopted to solve the ultimate load. The lower limit analysis method of the rock-soil body mainly includes an analytical method, a lower limit method based on a numerical method, and the like. Particularly, in recent thirty years, the combination of the lower limit method, the finite element discrete idea and the block unit discrete idea makes it possible to construct the static allowable stress field of the large-scale geotechnical structure; and the lower limit solution obtained by the lower limit method is smaller than the true solution (is more safe), so the lower limit solution is also most useful for engineering. The advantages of the lower limit method are: the lower limit method is theoretically tighter than the rigid body limit balance method; meanwhile, the lower limit method of constitutive relation without considering materials is more efficient than the finite element method in numerical calculation; the lower limit method can obtain the safety coefficient and the stress field at the same time. The research results of the deterministic analysis of the rock slope by using the lower limit method are very many, but the research results of the reliability analysis of the rock slope by using the lower limit method are very few.
In view of the above, the invention provides a new lower limit method for reliability analysis of jointed rock slopes based on the research work of the national science fund project (51564026).
Disclosure of Invention
The invention provides a lower limit method for reliability analysis of a jointed rock slope, and provides a new method for reliability calculation of the jointed rock slope.
The technical scheme of the invention is as follows: a lower limit method for reliability analysis of jointed rock slopes comprises the following specific steps:
and 5, calculating the reliability of the jointed rock slope according to the result of the step 4.
The basic information of the jointed rock slope comprises: the geometrical parameters of the jointed rock slope, the physical and mechanical parameters of the complete rock mass, the geological parameters of the structural plane and the external load information of the slope.
The step 2 specifically comprises the following steps: determining the cohesion c of the structural surfaceskMean value of (a)cStandard deviation σcAnd coefficient of variation deltacAngle of frictionMean value ofStandard deviation ofAnd coefficient of variationWhile setting the cohesion ckAngle of frictionIs a normal distribution; generation of cohesion and friction angles for structural plane k using Monte Carlo random number Generation functionRandom number of
The step 3 specifically comprises the following steps: (1) adopting a block unit to discretely joint the rock slope, and discretizing the joint rock slope into a geometric system of the block unit and a structural surface; (2) establishing an objective function: setting a random variable of the volume weight overload coefficient as a target function; (3) establishing a lower limit method constraint condition of the block unit; (4) establishing a limit state function for calculating the reliability of the jointed rock slope; (5) obtaining a lower limit method random planning model for solving the reliability of the jointed rock slope according to constraint conditions of the target function and the lower limit method and by combining the Monte Carlo random number of the shearing parameters of the structural surface and the extreme state function calculated by the reliability of the jointed rock slope; the lower limit method constraint conditions of the block units comprise balance conditions of the block units, yield conditions of structural surfaces and static force boundary conditions of the block units.
The step 4 specifically comprises the following steps: random number of cohesive forceRandom number of friction anglesSubstituting the lower limit method random planning model from 1 to N successively; for each one determinedThe random programming model is changed into a linear programming problem of which the coefficient matrix is a fixed value, and a simplex method is adopted to solve a corresponding objective function lambda (t); substituting the solved N groups of lambda (t), (t is 1, …, N) into the extreme state function to obtain the extreme state function Z is lambda (t), (t is 1, …, N) of the jointed rock slope.
The reliability of the jointed rock slope comprises the mean value, the standard deviation and the reliability index of the unit weight overload coefficient of the jointed rock slope and the failure probability of the jointed rock slope.
The lower limit method stochastic programming model is as follows:
where t is 1, …, N is the number of random numbers generated;
a limiting state function Z of the reliability calculation of the jointed rock slope is lambda (t), and an objective function lambda (t) represents a random variable of a volume weight overload coefficient;
denotes the equilibrium condition of the bulk unit, miIs the number of structural planes, alpha, in the block unit ikIs n of structural plane kkThe included angle between the axis and the x axis is positive anticlockwise, NkIs structural plane k along outer normal nkNormal force in direction and pulling positive pressure negative, VkIs that the structural plane k is along the tangential direction skThe block rotates anticlockwise to be positive, lambda (t) is the random quantity of the t-th overload coefficient, gamma is the unit weight of the block unit material, AiIs the area of the bulk unit i, fxiIs the equivalent external force in the x direction at the centroid of the ith block unit, fyiIs an equivalent external force in the y direction at the centroid of the ith block element,nbthe number of block units in the jointed rock slope is saved;
the yield condition of the structural surface is shown,is the t-th random number of structural surface k cohesion,is the t-th random number, l, of the k-friction angle of the structural planekIs the length of the structural plane k, nsThe number of structural surfaces in the whole jointed rock slope;
representing the static boundary conditions of the block unit,is the internal force vector of the structural surface with known boundary conditions, b represents the structural surface with known boundary external force equal to 0 in the jointed rock slope, ncThe number of structural surfaces with external force equal to 0 on the boundary in the whole rock slope is shown;
a generating function representing a monte carlo random number of cohesion and friction angles;respectively, are the average values of structural surface cohesion and friction angle,the standard deviation of the structural surface cohesion and the friction angle are respectively.
The invention has the beneficial effects that:
1. the invention provides a new method for analyzing the reliability of the ultimate bearing capacity of the jointed rock slope, and the reliability of the jointed rock slope (the mean value, the standard deviation and the reliability index of the volume weight overload coefficient and the failure probability of the jointed rock slope) can be solved by combining the lower limit method theory, the block unit dispersion idea, the random planning method and the Monte Carlo method for the first time.
2. The method can obtain the normal distribution condition of the volume weight overload coefficient corresponding to the Monte Carlo random number (normal distribution) of the structural surface cohesive force and the friction angle, and can calculate the failure probability of the side slope according to the volume weight overload coefficient less than 1;
3. the method adopts the Monte Carlo method to solve the random programming problem, and has the characteristics of high precision, high calculation speed and the like;
4. the method solves the linear programming problem by adopting a simplex method, and the calculation program is simple to program.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a flow chart of the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a schematic view of the stress of a jointed rock slope block unit;
FIG. 3 is a schematic view of a structural plane between adjacent block units of a jointed rock slope;
FIG. 4 is a schematic view of the geometry of the jointed rock slopes of example 1;
FIG. 5 is a random number of AC cohesive force of the structural surface of example 1A schematic diagram of normal distribution;
FIG. 6 is a random number of AC rubbing angles of the structural surfaces of example 1A schematic diagram of normal distribution;
FIG. 7 is a discrete schematic view of the jointing rock slope block unit of example 1;
FIG. 8 is a schematic diagram of the normal distribution of the volume-weight overload coefficient of the jointed rock slope in example 1;
FIG. 9 is a schematic view of the geometry of the jointed rock slopes of example 2;
FIG. 10 is a graph showing the random number of cohesive force of the structural surface in example 2A schematic diagram of normal distribution;
FIG. 11 is a random number of the rubbing angles of the structural surfaces of example 2A schematic diagram of normal distribution;
FIG. 12 is a discrete schematic view of the jointing rock slope block unit of example 2;
FIG. 13 is a schematic diagram of the volume weight overload coefficient normal distribution of the jointed rock slopes of example 2.
Detailed Description
Example 1: as shown in fig. 1 to 13, a lower limit method for reliability analysis of jointed rock slopes includes the following steps:
drawing up basic information of jointed rock slope
Example 1 is a rock slope comprising a set of weak structural surfaces, the structure of which is shown in fig. 4, and the main calculation parameters are as follows: the geometrical parameters of the jointed rock slope are as follows: the height is 55.94m, the top width is 36.6m, and the angle of the face is 45 degrees; the volume weight of the complete rock mass is set to be a fixed value and 25kN/m is taken3(ii) a The inclination angle of the structural surface (joint surface) AC is 30 degrees; the side slope is only under the action of the dead load of the rock mass.
(II) generating Monte Carlo random numbers of shear parameters of structural surfaces
Average value of the cohesion of the structural surface ACc100kPa, coefficient of variation δcRespectively taking 0.10, 0.15, 0.20 and 0.25, and taking the average value of the friction angleCoefficient of variationThe probability distribution types of the cohesion and the friction angle are normal distribution respectively taken as 0.10, 0.15, 0.20 and 0.25. Generation of AC shear parameters of structural plane by using formula (1)The random number of (2). In this example, 3000N are taken as N, that is, 3000 random numbers of cohesion and friction angle are generated, respectivelyAt the coefficient of variation deltacRandom number of structural surface AC cohesive force when 0.2The normal distribution of (A) is shown in FIG. 5, and the coefficient of variation at the friction angleIn the case of (2) random number of AC friction angles of the structural surfaceThe normal distribution of (A) is shown in FIG. 6.
(III) establishing a lower limit method random programming model for solving the reliability of the jointed rock slope
The slope of example 1 was discretized into 2 block units as shown in fig. 7. And (3) establishing a lower-limit method stochastic programming model for solving the reliability of the jointed rock slope in the embodiment 1 according to the formula (9).
(IV) numerical solution of lower-limit method stochastic programming model for reliability calculation of jointed rock slopes
3000 sets of volume weight overload systems lambda (t) (t is 1, …,3000) are calculated by adopting a numerical calculation process of the reliability lower limit of the jointed rock slopes as shown in fig. 1. Mean value of cohesion in structural planec100kPa, coefficient of variation δc0.20, average of angle of frictionCoefficient of variationFig. 8 shows the normal distribution of the calculated slope specific gravity overload coefficients λ (t), (t ═ 1, …,3000) in example 1.
And (V) calculating the reliability of the jointed rock slope.
The reliability of the jointed rock slope of the embodiment 1 obtained by solving the equations (10), (11), (12) and (14) is shown in table 1.
Table 1 example 1 statistical table of reliability of jointed rock slopes
In the case where all the parameters are constant values, solving the volume weight overload coefficient of the slope is a statically determined problem, the limit value of the corresponding constant value λ can be determined analytically, and the cohesion c at the structural surface AC isk100000kPa, friction angleIn the case of (2), the obtained analysis of the volume-weight overload coefficient is 1.259, the errors of the mean value and the analysis solution of various different variation coefficients calculated by the method of the invention are small (within 1.1%), and the errors of the mean value and the analysis solution increase with the increase of the variation coefficient.
The reliability of the side slope is that the beta mark is reduced along with the increase of the variation coefficient, which shows that the higher the discrete degree of the shear strength parameter is, the lower the reliability of the side slope is.
Probability of failure P of slopefThe coefficient of variation increases, which shows that the higher the dispersion degree of the shear strength parameter, the higher the failure probability of the slope.
Example 2: a lower limit method for reliability analysis of jointed rock slopes comprises the following specific steps:
drawing up basic information of jointed rock slope
Example 2 is a rock slope containing two sets of joints, the geometrical information of which is shown in fig. 9, and the main calculation parameters are as follows: the geometrical parameters of the jointed rock slope are as follows: the height is 30m, the top width is 45m, and the angle of the blank surface is 80 degrees; the volume weight of the complete rock mass is set to be a fixed value and 27kN/m is taken3The distance between the two groups of structural surfaces (joint surfaces) is 6m, and the inclination angles of the two groups of structural surfaces are respectively 25 degrees and 80 degrees; the side slope is only under the action of the dead load of the rock mass.
(II) generating Monte Carlo random numbers of shear parameters of structural surfaces
Example 2: average value of all structural surface cohesionc50kPa, coefficient of variation δcRespectively taking 0.10, 0.15, 0.20 and 0.25, and taking the average value of the friction angles of all structural surfacesCoefficient of variationRespectively taking 0.10, 0.15, 0.20 and 0.25. Random numbers of the shear parameters of all structural surfaces of the slope of example 2 were generated using equation (1). In this example, N is 3000, that is, 3000 random numbers each generating joint cohesion and friction angle
At the coefficient of variation deltacRandom number of all structural surface cohesive force in the case of 0.15Is shown in FIG. 10, and the normal distribution of the coefficient of variationRandom number of friction angles of all structural surfaces in the case of (2)The normal distribution of (A) is shown in FIG. 11.
(III) solving lower limit method stochastic programming model of reliability of jointed rock slope
The slope of example 2 was discretized into 37 block units as shown in fig. 12. And (3) establishing a lower-limit method random planning model of the reliability of the jointed rock slope in the embodiment 2 according to the formula (9).
(IV) numerical solution of lower-limit method stochastic programming model for reliability calculation of jointed rock slopes
3000 sets of volume weight overload systems λ (t) (1, …,3000) in example 2 were calculated by using the numerical calculation flow of the lower limit of reliability of jointed rock slopes as shown in fig. 1.
Mean value of cohesion in structural planec50kPa, coefficient of variation δc0.15, mean value of rubbing angleCoefficient of variationFig. 13 shows the normal distribution of the calculated slope bulk density overload coefficients λ (t), (t ═ 1, …,3000) in example 2.
And (V) calculating the reliability of the jointed rock slope.
The reliability of the jointed rock slope of the embodiment 2 obtained by solving the equations (10), (11), (12) and (14) is shown in Table 2.
Table 2 example 2 reliability statistical table for jointed rock slopes
The mean value and the standard deviation of the volume weight overload coefficients of the jointed rock slope are increased along with the increase of the variation coefficient, and the reliability index beta is reduced along with the increase of the variation coefficient.
Failure probability P of jointed rock slopefThe coefficient of variation decreased and increased, and the probability of failure was 17.867% when the coefficient of variation assumed 0.1, and increased to 35.7% when the coefficient of variation assumed 0.25.
The working principle of the invention is as follows:
the method comprises the steps of taking a jointed rock slope as a research object, combining a Monte Carlo method, a lower limit method theory, a block unit discrete thought and a random planning method, and solving the reliability of the jointed rock slope; firstly, generating random numbers of structural surface shearing parameters by adopting a Monte Carlo method; then, dispersing the jointed rock slopes into a geometric body of a block unit and a structural surface; constructing a static allowable stress field of the jointed rock slope according to a lower limit method theory, wherein the static allowable stress field simultaneously meets the block unit balance condition, the structural surface yield condition and the static boundary condition, and the volume weight overload coefficient is taken as a target function; a lower limit method stochastic programming model for solving the reliability of the jointed rock slope is established, and a solving method of the stochastic programming model is provided; the reliability of the jointed rock slope (including the mean value, standard deviation and reliability index of the volume weight overload coefficient and the failure probability of the slope) can be obtained through calculation.
The technical scheme of the invention is shown in figure 1.
The technical scheme of the lower limit method for solving the reliability of the jointed rock slope is sequentially carried out according to the following steps:
drawing up basic information of jointed rock slope
According to the actual situation of the jointed rock slope, main calculation parameters for reliability analysis are drawn up, and the calculation parameters comprise: the geometrical parameters of the jointed rock slope, the physical and mechanical parameters (volume weight and the like) of the complete rock mass, the geological parameters of the structural plane, the external load information of the slope and the like.
Second, generating Monte Carlo random numbers of shear parameters of structural surfaces
The bearing capacity of the jointed rock slope is mainly controlled by the strength of the structural surface, and two shear strength parameters (cohesion c) of the structural surfacekAngle of frictionHas larger uncertainty and variability, so the invention sets the cohesion c of the structural surfacekAngle of frictionAre mutually independent random quantities and conform to normal distribution; and simultaneously setting other parameters such as the volume weight of the rock mass and the like as fixed values. The invention adopts the Monte Carlo method to generate the random quantity of the cohesive force and the friction angleThe specific process of the random number is as follows:
1.determining the cohesion c of the structural surfaceskMean value of (a)cStandard deviation σcAnd coefficient of variation deltacAngle of frictionMean value ofStandard deviation ofAnd coefficient of variationWhile setting the cohesion ckAngle of frictionIs a normal distribution;
2. generation of cohesion and friction angles for structural plane k using Monte Carlo random number Generation functionThe random number, cohesion and friction angle monte carlo random number generation functions of (a) are as follows:
in the formula, t is (1, …, N), N is the number of generated random numbers and is generally 2000-5000;the t-th random number (the superscript r represents that the variable is a random number variable) of the structural surface cohesion;the t-th random number (the superscript r represents that the variable is a random number variable) which is the friction angle of the structural surface;respectively, are the average values of structural surface cohesion and friction angle,the standard deviation of the structural surface cohesion and the friction angle are respectively.
Third, establishing a lower limit method random planning model for solving the reliability of the jointed rock slope
The lower limit of plasticity limit analysis method can be described as: the ultimate load is the largest among the loads corresponding to all static allowable stress fields. The stress field that simultaneously satisfies the equilibrium condition, the yield condition, and the static force boundary condition is referred to as the static force allowable stress field. In a jointed rock slope structure body, a plurality of static fields meeting the conditions can be constructed; one seeks its corresponding load, where the maximum load is necessarily the closest to the true limit load. The lower bound solution is necessarily smaller than the true solution.
In order to construct the static allowable stress field of the jointed rock slope, the invention adopts block units to discretely joint the rock slope, sets the overload coefficient of the external load of the slope as an objective function, constructs the static allowable stress field of which the block units simultaneously meet a balance equation, a yield condition and a boundary condition, and establishes a lower limit method random programming model for solving the ultimate load of the jointed rock slope. The method comprises the following specific steps:
1. discrete jointing rock slope by adopting block units
The invention adopts the block units to discretely joint the rock slope, the stress of the block units is shown in figure 2, and the stress of the structural surface k of the adjacent block units is shown in figure 3. Wherein (x, y) is the global coordinate system; (n)k,sk) Is a local coordinate system of a structural plane k between adjacent block units i, j, n as shown in FIG. 3kIs the outer normal direction of the structural plane k, skIs tangential to the structural surface; i-shaped center C of block unitiActing on equivalent load force vectorfxiIs the equivalent external force in the x direction at the centroid of the ith block unit, fyiIs the equivalent external force in the y direction at the centroid of the ith block element. (ii) a Structural plane k centroid P between adjacent block units i and jkActing on the joint with an internal force vectorThe other side of the structural surface acts with the reaction force vector thereofNkIs along the structural plane k along the external normal nkNormal force in direction (positive or negative sign: pulling positive or negative), VkIs along the structure plane k along the tangential direction skDirectional shearing force (the sign of which is defined as that the block is rotated counterclockwise to be positive), N'kIs NkReaction force of (V)kIs' is VkThe reaction force of (a).
After the discrete joint rock slope of the block units is adopted, the joint slope becomes a geometric system of the block units and a structural plane, and in order to simplify calculation and facilitate the construction of constraint conditions of a static allowable stress field of a lower limit method, the invention makes the following assumptions: (1) assuming that the block unit only translates and does not rotate; (2) assuming that the block units are rigid bodies, the block units cannot deform or be damaged at all, and the damage of the side slope only occurs on the structural surface between the adjacent block units; (3) assuming that the structural plane material is an ideal rigid plastic material, and (4) assuming that the structural plane in the rock body is only subjected to shear failure.
2. Establishing an objective function
The invention adopts a volume weight overload mode to ensure that the jointed rock slope reaches a limit state, and the actual volume weight of the rock mass of the slope is set as gamma, namely, the slope is in a damaged limit state when the volume weight gamma is gradually increased to gamma'. The invention defines the volume weight overload coefficient as follows:
in the above formula: lambda is the volume weight overload coefficient of the jointed rock slope; gamma' is the ultimate volume weight of the block unit material when the jointed rock slope is overloaded; gamma is the current actual volume weight of the block unit material of the jointed rock slope.
According to the lower limit method theory, when the jointed rock slope reaches a limit state, the maximum value gamma' of the volume weight gamma is required; when the random variation of the cohesion force and the random variation of the friction angle of the structural surface are respectively dispersed into N random numbers according to the formula (1), the volume weight overload coefficient lambda is also correspondingly changed intoAndthe relevant random variables are as follows:
in the above formula: t is (1, …, N), and λ (t) is a random variable of the joint rock slope unit weight overload coefficient.
According to the theory of the lower limit method, the random variable lambda (t) of the volume-weight overload coefficient is set as the following objective function:
Maximize:λ(t)(4)
3. establishing lower bound constraints for a block unit
Building a static allowable stress field requires that the block units simultaneously satisfy a balance equation, a yield condition and a static boundary condition.
(1) Equilibrium condition of block unit
For any block unit i shown in fig. 2 to be balanced under the action of self weight, external load and adjacent rock, the force balance equation is as follows:
in the above formula: n isbThe number of block units in the jointed rock slope is saved; m isiIs the number of structural faces in the block unit i; λ (t) is the t-th overload coefficient random quantity, AiIs the area of the block unit i, and γ is the block unitVolume weight of material, alphakIs n of structural plane kkThe angle between the axis and the x-axis (positive or negative, provided that it is positive counterclockwise), NkIs along the structural plane k along the external normal nkNormal force in direction (positive or negative sign: pulling positive or negative), VkIs along the structure plane k along the tangential direction skShear in the direction (the sign of which defines that the block is rotated anticlockwise to positive), fxiIs the equivalent external force in the x direction at the centroid of the ith block unit, fyiIs the equivalent external force in the y direction at the centroid of the ith block element.
(2) Yield condition of structural surface
For any one of the structural surfaces k shown in FIG. 3, N sets of random numbers are used due to the cohesive force and friction angle of the structural surfaceThe Mohr-Coulomb yield condition for shear slip failure of structural plane k can therefore be written in the form of random numbers of cohesion and friction angle:
in the above formula: n issThe number of structural surfaces in the whole jointed rock slope; lkIs the length of structural plane k;a tth random number (the superscript r represents a variable as a random number variable) which is the cohesive force of the structural surface k;the t-th random number (the superscript r represents that the variable is a random number variable) of the friction angle of the structural plane k; n is a radical ofkIs the normal force (sign convention: pulling positive and negative) V of the structural plane kkIs the shear of structural plane k; n is the number of cohesion random numbers and friction angle random numbers.
(3) Static boundary conditions of block units
According to the lower bound law theory, the static allowable stress field must satisfy known static boundary conditions. Considering a structural surface b with a known boundary external force equal to 0 in the jointed rock slope, the boundary condition expression is as follows:
in the above formula: n iscThe number of structural surfaces with external force equal to 0 on the boundary in the whole rock slope is shown;is the internal force vector of the structural plane for which the boundary conditions are known.
4. Establishing a limit state function for calculating the reliability of the jointed rock slope
In order to solve the mathematical distribution rule of the volume weight overload coefficient of the jointed rock slope, the invention sets the extreme state function of the reliability calculation of the jointed rock slope according to the formula (3) as follows:
in the above formula: z is the extreme state function of the jointed rock slopes.
5. Lower limit method random planning model for establishing joint rock slope reliability calculation
According to the objective function formula (4) of the static allowable stress field and the constraint condition formulas (5), (6) and (7) of the lower limit method, and by combining the condensation force random number and the friction angle random number of the structural surface to generate the function formula (1) and the extreme state function formula (8) for calculating the reliability of the jointed rock slope, the lower limit method random programming model for solving the reliability of the jointed rock slope can be as follows:
in the above formula: (t ═ 1, …, N).
Fourthly, numerical solution of lower limit method random programming model for calculating reliability of jointed rock slope
The solution objective of equation (9) is: random number of cohesive force from structural surfaceAnd random number of friction angleThe mathematical characteristics of the volume-weight overload coefficient random variable lambda (t) are solved. The coefficient of the matrix of the lower limit method model of the formula (9) includes random numbers of the cohesive force and the friction angle of the structural surfaceWhich is a typical random programming problem and thus attempts to go directly throughIt is very difficult to accurately solve the mathematical characteristics of λ (t), and only approximate numerical calculation methods can be used.
The invention adopts the following numerical method to solve the lower limit method random programming model of the reliability of the jointed rock slope:
(1) cycling t from t to 1 to t to N, and sequentially calculating the random number of the cohesive forceRandom number of friction anglesSubstitution formula (9);
(2) for each determinationThe equation (9) becomes a linear programming problem with a coefficient matrix being a fixed value, and a simplex method is adopted to solve the corresponding objective function lambda (t);
(3) substituting the solved N groups λ (t), (t ═ 1, …, N) into the extreme state function, and calculating the extreme state function Z ═ λ (t), (t ═ 1, …, N) of the jointed rock slope.
The numerical solution flow of the present invention is shown in fig. 1.
And fifthly, calculating the reliability of the jointed rock slope.
Calculating the basic statistics of the extreme state function Z according to the calculated N groups of lambda (t) to obtain the reliability of the jointed rock slope, wherein the reliability comprises the following steps: the mean value, the standard deviation and the reliability index of the volume weight overload coefficient of the jointed rock slope and the failure probability of the jointed rock slope.
The mean value calculation formula of the volume weight overload coefficient of the jointed rock slope is as follows:
in the above formula: mu.sλIs the mean value of the volume weight overload coefficient of the jointed rock slope.
The standard deviation calculation formula of the volume weight overload coefficient of the jointed rock slope is as follows:
in the above formula: sigmaλIs the standard deviation of the volume weight overload coefficient of the jointed rock slope.
The joint rock slope reliability index calculation formula is as follows:
in the above formula: mu.sλIs the mean value, sigma, of the volume weight overload coefficient of the jointed rock slopeλIs the standard deviation of the volume weight overload coefficient of the jointed rock slope, and beta is the reliability index of the jointed rock slope.
When the volume weight overload coefficient of the side slope is more than or equal to 1, the side slope is safe, and when the volume weight overload coefficient of the side slope is less than 1, the side slope is unstable, so that the failure function of the jointed rock side slope is as follows:
in the above formula: i (t) is a function of failure of the jointed rock slopes.
The probability of failure P of the slope can be calculated as follows:
in the above formula: pfIs the failure probability of the jointed rock slope.
The invention is characterized in that: the method combines a Monte Carlo method, a plastic limit analysis lower limit method, a block unit discrete thought and random planning, provides a lower limit method for calculating the reliability of the jointed rock slope, can calculate and obtain the mean value, the standard deviation and the reliability index of the volume weight overload coefficient of the slope, and can obtain the failure probability of the jointed rock slope. Compared with the traditional limit balance reliability analysis method, the method has higher calculation precision; compared with a finite element reliability analysis method, the method omits the constitutive relation of the materials, so that the calculation speed and efficiency are higher.
While the present invention has been described in detail with reference to the embodiments shown in the drawings, the present invention is not limited to the embodiments, and various changes can be made without departing from the spirit of the present invention within the knowledge of those skilled in the art.
Claims (1)
1. The utility model provides a joint rock matter side slope reliability analysis lower limit method which characterized in that: the lower limit method comprises the following specific steps:
step 1, drawing up basic information of the jointed rock slope according to the actual situation of the jointed rock slope;
step 2, generating a Monte Carlo random number of the shearing resistance parameter of the structural surface;
step 3, establishing a lower limit method random planning model for solving the reliability of the jointed rock slope;
step 4, solving numerical values of a lower limit method random programming model for calculating the reliability of the jointed rock slope to obtain a limit state function of the jointed rock slope;
step 5, calculating the reliability of the jointed rock slope according to the result of the step 4;
the lower limit method stochastic programming model is as follows:
where t is 1, …, N is the number of random numbers generated;
a limiting state function Z of the reliability calculation of the jointed rock slope is lambda (t), and an objective function lambda (t) represents a random variable of a volume weight overload coefficient;
denotes the equilibrium condition of the bulk unit, miIs the number of structural planes in the block unit i, akIs n of structural plane kkThe included angle between the axis and the x axis is positive anticlockwise, NkIs structural plane k along outer normal nkNormal force in direction and pulling positive pressure negative, VkIs that the structural plane k is along the tangential direction skThe block rotates anticlockwise to be positive, lambda (t) is the random quantity of the t-th overload coefficient, gamma is the unit weight of the block unit material, AiIs the area of the bulk unit i, fxiIs the equivalent external force in the x direction at the centroid of the ith block unit, fyiIs the equivalent external force in the y direction at the centroid of the ith block unit, nbThe number of block units in the jointed rock slope is saved;
the yield condition of the structural surface is shown,is the t-th random number of structural surface k cohesion,is the t-th random number, l, of the k-friction angle of the structural planekIs the length of the structural plane k, nsThe number of structural surfaces in the whole jointed rock slope;
representing the static boundary conditions of the block unit,is the internal force vector of the structural surface with known boundary conditions, b represents the structural surface with known boundary external force equal to 0 in the jointed rock slope, ncThe number of structural surfaces with external force equal to 0 on the boundary in the whole rock slope is shown;
a generating function representing a monte carlo random number of cohesion and friction angles; mu.sc,Mean values, σ, of structural surface cohesion and friction angle, respectivelyc,Respectively are the standard deviation of the structural surface cohesion and the friction angle;
the step 2 specifically comprises the following steps: determining the cohesion c of the structural surfaceskMean value of (a)cStandard deviation σcAnd coefficient of variation deltacAngle of frictionMean value ofStandard deviation ofAnd coefficient of variationWhile setting the cohesion ckAngle of frictionIs a normal distribution; generation of cohesion and friction angles for structural plane k using Monte Carlo random number Generation functionRandom number of
The basic information of the jointed rock slope comprises: the method comprises the following steps of (1) saving geometrical parameters of a rock slope, physical and mechanical parameters of a complete rock body, structural surface geological parameters and slope external load information;
the step 3 specifically comprises the following steps: (1) adopting a block unit to discretely joint the rock slope, and discretizing the joint rock slope into a geometric system of the block unit and a structural surface; (2) establishing an objective function: setting a random variable of the volume weight overload coefficient as a target function; (3) establishing a lower limit method constraint condition of the block unit; (4) establishing a limit state function for calculating the reliability of the jointed rock slope; (5) obtaining a lower limit method random planning model for solving the reliability of the jointed rock slope according to constraint conditions of the target function and the lower limit method and by combining the Monte Carlo random number of the shearing parameters of the structural surface and the extreme state function calculated by the reliability of the jointed rock slope; the lower limit method constraint conditions of the block units comprise balance conditions of the block units, yield conditions of structural surfaces and static force boundary conditions of the block units;
the step 4 specifically comprises the following steps: random number of cohesive forceRandom number of friction anglesSubstituting the lower limit method random planning model from 1 to N successively; for each one determinedThe random programming model is changed into a linear programming problem of which the coefficient matrix is a fixed value, and a simplex method is adopted to solve a corresponding objective function lambda (t); substituting the solved N groups of lambda (t) into the extreme state function to obtain the extreme state function Z of the jointed rock slope as lambda (t);
the reliability of the jointed rock slope comprises the mean value, the standard deviation and the reliability index of the unit weight overload coefficient of the jointed rock slope and the failure probability of the jointed rock slope.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201711276041.3A CN108170898B (en) | 2017-12-06 | 2017-12-06 | Lower limit method for reliability analysis of jointed rock slope |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201711276041.3A CN108170898B (en) | 2017-12-06 | 2017-12-06 | Lower limit method for reliability analysis of jointed rock slope |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN108170898A CN108170898A (en) | 2018-06-15 |
CN108170898B true CN108170898B (en) | 2021-12-17 |
Family
ID=62525295
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN201711276041.3A Active CN108170898B (en) | 2017-12-06 | 2017-12-06 | Lower limit method for reliability analysis of jointed rock slope |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN108170898B (en) |
Families Citing this family (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN111651902B (en) * | 2020-06-29 | 2023-03-31 | 中国有色金属工业昆明勘察设计研究院有限公司 | Simulated power lower limit method for calculating rock slope stability of Xigeda stratum |
CN111651900B (en) * | 2020-06-29 | 2023-07-04 | 中国有色金属工业昆明勘察设计研究院有限公司 | Pseudo-power upper limit method for calculating stability of rock slope of Xigeda stratum |
CN112541257B (en) * | 2020-12-08 | 2023-02-10 | 中国有色金属工业昆明勘察设计研究院有限公司 | Method for calculating service life of limestone slope based on corrosion rate |
CN113033108B (en) * | 2021-04-19 | 2022-05-27 | 昆明理工大学 | Side slope reliability judging method based on AdaBoost algorithm |
Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP2214087A1 (en) * | 2009-01-30 | 2010-08-04 | Research In Motion Limited | A handheld electronic device having a touchscreen and a method of using a touchscreen of a handheld electronic device |
CN104899380A (en) * | 2015-06-11 | 2015-09-09 | 武汉大学 | Side slope stable reliability sensitivity analysis method based on Monte Carlo simulation |
CN106126796A (en) * | 2016-06-20 | 2016-11-16 | 昆明理工大学 | A kind of plastic limit analysis Lower Bound Limit of the rock side slope ultimate bearing capacity of band rock bridge |
CN107330145A (en) * | 2017-05-26 | 2017-11-07 | 昆明理工大学 | It is a kind of while considering the jointed rock slope analysis of Ultimate Lower Bound Limit of rock mass translation and turning effect |
Family Cites Families (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2013522588A (en) * | 2010-03-12 | 2013-06-13 | エンハンスド サーフェイス ダイナミクス,インコーポレイテッド | System and method for fast collection of data from pressure sensors in a pressure sensing system |
CN107341285B (en) * | 2017-05-26 | 2020-08-25 | 昆明理工大学 | Lower limit method for analysis of joint rock slope toppling damage limit bearing capacity under action of seismic force |
-
2017
- 2017-12-06 CN CN201711276041.3A patent/CN108170898B/en active Active
Patent Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP2214087A1 (en) * | 2009-01-30 | 2010-08-04 | Research In Motion Limited | A handheld electronic device having a touchscreen and a method of using a touchscreen of a handheld electronic device |
CN104899380A (en) * | 2015-06-11 | 2015-09-09 | 武汉大学 | Side slope stable reliability sensitivity analysis method based on Monte Carlo simulation |
CN106126796A (en) * | 2016-06-20 | 2016-11-16 | 昆明理工大学 | A kind of plastic limit analysis Lower Bound Limit of the rock side slope ultimate bearing capacity of band rock bridge |
CN107330145A (en) * | 2017-05-26 | 2017-11-07 | 昆明理工大学 | It is a kind of while considering the jointed rock slope analysis of Ultimate Lower Bound Limit of rock mass translation and turning effect |
Non-Patent Citations (4)
Title |
---|
Probabilistic slope stability analysis based on the upper bound theorem;Hongtao Zhang et al;《2010 International Conference on E-Product E-Service and E-Entertainment》;20101109;第1-4页 * |
土质路堤边坡稳定可靠度分析方法探讨;吕杨;《中国优秀硕士学位论文全文数据库 工程科技Ⅱ辑》;20140915;正文第4-10、14页 * |
基于刚性块体系统的岩质边坡稳定性上基于刚性块体系统的岩质边坡稳定性上限法研究;李泽 等;《岩石力学与工程学报》;20140131;第33卷;第2845-2852页 * |
基于刚性块体系统的岩质边坡稳定性下限法研究;李泽 等;《岩石力学与工程学报》;20120831;第34卷(第8期);第1535-1540页 * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN108170898A (en) | 2018-06-15 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN108170898B (en) | Lower limit method for reliability analysis of jointed rock slope | |
CN107330145B (en) | Rock slope ultimate bearing capacity analysis lower limit method considering rotation effect | |
CN107341285B (en) | Lower limit method for analysis of joint rock slope toppling damage limit bearing capacity under action of seismic force | |
CN106126796B (en) | A kind of plastic limit analysis Lower Bound Limit of the rock side slope ultimate bearing capacity with rock bridge | |
CN108763697B (en) | Method for calculating failure probability of rock in rock slope | |
CN105808884B (en) | Fractal theory-based bounded uncertainty plane crack stress intensity factor upper and lower bound prediction method | |
CN107992687A (en) | Rock side slope reliability plastic limit analysis upper bound method based on monte carlo method | |
CN112069574A (en) | Circular foundation pit stability analysis method based on limit analysis upper limit theorem | |
CN108170899A (en) | A kind of soil-slope reliability analysis upper bound method | |
Yang et al. | A no-tension elastic–plastic model and optimized back-analysis technique for modeling nonlinear mechanical behavior of rock mass in tunneling | |
CN102682175B (en) | Method for analyzing reliability of construction error of grid structure based on buckling mode combination | |
Wu et al. | Probabilistic interval limit analysis for structures with hybrid uncertainty | |
Qu et al. | An explicit time integration scheme of numerical manifold method | |
CN109902345B (en) | Two-dimensional slope limit load solving method based on limit analysis lower limit theorem | |
CN108268729A (en) | The elasticity modulus frequency sensitivity analysis method and system of transmission pressure | |
Altland et al. | Modeling of cube array roughness: RANS, large eddy simulation, and direct numerical simulation | |
CN104331539A (en) | Nuclear power plant pipe thermal stratification effect fatigue evaluation method and system | |
Kang et al. | Prediction of Stope Stability Using Variable Weight and Unascertained Measurement Technique | |
Ureel et al. | An investigation of the limit equilibrium method and numerical modeling for rock slope stability analysis | |
McLean et al. | Post-processing of finite element stress fields using dual kriging based methods for structural analysis of concrete dams | |
CN113987816A (en) | Tunnel roof monitoring method based on Monte Carlo random sampling and principal component analysis | |
Memon et al. | On consistency, stability and convergence of a modified ordinary differential equation solver | |
Su et al. | Advances in numerical methods for the solution of population balance equations for disperse phase systems | |
CN114492140A (en) | Method for dividing dangerous partitions in excavation of high and steep joint slope | |
CN114004117A (en) | Slope earthquake slip probability analysis method considering soil body parameter space variability |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PB01 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
GR01 | Patent grant |