CN108154943A - Nuclear power plant reactor protection system at regular intervals experiment T2 test methods - Google Patents
Nuclear power plant reactor protection system at regular intervals experiment T2 test methods Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN108154943A CN108154943A CN201711189132.3A CN201711189132A CN108154943A CN 108154943 A CN108154943 A CN 108154943A CN 201711189132 A CN201711189132 A CN 201711189132A CN 108154943 A CN108154943 A CN 108154943A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- test
- experiment
- tested
- regular intervals
- nuclear power
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G21—NUCLEAR PHYSICS; NUCLEAR ENGINEERING
- G21C—NUCLEAR REACTORS
- G21C17/00—Monitoring; Testing ; Maintaining
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02E—REDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
- Y02E30/00—Energy generation of nuclear origin
- Y02E30/30—Nuclear fission reactors
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Plasma & Fusion (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- High Energy & Nuclear Physics (AREA)
- Monitoring And Testing Of Nuclear Reactors (AREA)
- Testing And Monitoring For Control Systems (AREA)
Abstract
The invention belongs to nuclear power plant reactors to protect system at regular intervals experimental technique field, and in particular to a kind of nuclear power plant reactor protection system at regular intervals experiment T2 test methods.Include the following steps：Confirm that selected system under test (SUT) is in the state that can be tested；Test system to be measured is simultaneously placed in bypass state by selected system to be tested；The controller for protecting system is placed in service mode, verifies system mode value, and records the output valve of test system to be measured before experiment；Experiment is performed to selected test case；After test, all force values are released, restore the state before tested test system to test and are confirmed, otherwise carry out positioning problems and troubleshooting, it is ensured that tested test system reverts to state before experiment, in order to avoid protection system is impacted.Operation and maintenance of the present invention is more convenient, and can multiple experiments be optimized integration, be improved the utilization rate of window time.
Description
Technical field
The invention belongs to nuclear power plant reactors to protect system at regular intervals experimental technique field, and in particular to a kind of nuclear power station reaction
Heap protection system at regular intervals experiment T2 test methods.
Background technology
Reactor protection system (RPS) major function is the complete of protection fuel can, primary Ioops pressure boundary and containment
Whole property, when protecting the parameter of system monitoring beyond the threshold value of some setting, input parameter is through overprotection system processing unit
Voting logic can export a series of actions (including the ad hoc action of shutdown breaker and safety) so as to reach safeguard protection work(
Energy.In order to ensure the availability of reactor protection system function and reliability, at regular intervals just need to protection system into
Row routine test, to verify the integrality of its function.
The routine test of reactor protection system is divided into be tested for T1, T2, T3, and wherein T2 experiments are mainly to signal processing
Unit is verified that experiment is taken bypass measure or carried out during shutdown, to avoid the injection due to stimulus, is caused anti-
Answer heap shutdown breaker or safe ad hoc malfunction.T2 tests the logic maincenter that main test object is protection system, to whole
The safe and stable operation of a nuclear power station is of great significance.Due to window time compared with it is short, test data amount is big, to T2 test
There is very high requirement in the required time and accuracy rate reliability.Traditional T2 experimental test scheme versatilities are poor, testing stand
It is single and have more complicated operation and maintenance condition, occupy a large amount of natively very nervous window times.For regular
T2 experiments in experiment individually develop, manufacture the input cost that testing stand also increases routine test naturally.
Invention content
It is an object of the invention to propose a kind of nuclear power plant reactor protection system at regular intervals experiment T2 test methods, to overcome
The shortcomings of the prior art.
In order to achieve the above objectives, the technical solution used in the present invention is：
A kind of nuclear power plant reactor protection system at regular intervals experiment T2 test methods, include the following steps：
Step 1：Confirm that selected system under test (SUT) is in the state that can be tested；
Step 2：Test system to be measured is simultaneously placed in bypass state by selected system to be tested；
Step 3：The controller for protecting system is placed in service mode, verifies system mode value, and is recorded to be measured before experiment
The output valve of test system generates journal file；
Step 4：Experiment is performed to selected test case；It is established using the maintenance network and system under test (SUT) of system under test (SUT)
Communication；Using the data for safeguarding network in system controller is protected and directly rewriting pilot passageway, experiment quilt is read in output terminal
Measured data, while comparison is made, and make conclusion (of pressure testing) according to experiment criterion and print out report with expected standard signal；
Step 5：After test, all force values are released, restore state and progress of the tested test system to before testing
Confirming, otherwise carry out positioning problems and troubleshooting, it is ensured that tested test system reverts to state before experiment, in order to avoid to protecting system
It impacts.
The single step of the step two supportive test process or automated execution test, and Real-time Feedback result of the test.
The step three will also make corresponding safeguard procedures, including forbidding input and output value and pressure in system under test (SUT)
Correlation, to ensure that system under test (SUT) is generated without shutdown condition.
Having the beneficial effect that acquired by the present invention：
Operation and maintenance of the present invention is more convenient, and can multiple experiments be optimized integration, be improved the utilization rate of window time.
The designing scheme can effectively solve the disadvantage that reactor protection system routine test device is complicated, maintenance difficulties are big, and can carry
High operation maintenance personnel tests the efficiency performed, shortens routine test window time.
For the present invention program using network is safeguarded as measurand injection testing signal, the output signal of system is protected in retaking of a year or grade,
Safeguard procedures are taken simultaneously to prevent triggering shutdown signal.The test output signal and expected result that acquisition is returned are compared,
Quickly handled using computer with food preservation test data, verify the correctness of tested protection system logic function and reliable
Property, it is automatic to export result and print record report.In the state for releasing mandatory parameters rapidly after the test, make tested test system
Or routing restoration is to reset condition.
Operating personnel can independently Selection experiment project, and result of the test can trace, improve test efficiency and autonomous
Property.It prevents stimulus from leading to the malfunction of reactor shutdown breaker using preventive means, greatly reduces routine test
Influence to reactor normal work.It is compared with other methods, this method only needs that casual network is accessed tested system at the trial
System without additionally accessing other test signals, reduces the human-equation error risk that experimental rig access protection system introduces, simplifies
Experiment and the complicated degree safeguarded.
Description of the drawings
Fig. 1 protects system at regular intervals to test T2 test method flow charts for nuclear power plant reactor.
Specific embodiment
The present invention is described in detail with specific embodiment below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
As shown in Figure 1, nuclear power plant reactor protection system at regular intervals experiment T2 test methods of the present invention include following step
Suddenly：
Step 1：Confirm that selected system under test (SUT) is in the state that can be tested.
Step 2：Test system to be measured is simultaneously placed in bypass state by selected system to be tested.The single step of supportive test process
Or automated execution test, and Real-time Feedback result of the test.
Step 3：The controller for protecting system is placed in service mode, verifies system mode value, and is recorded to be measured before experiment
The output valve of test system generates journal file.Corresponding safeguard procedures are made, such as forbid input and output value in system under test (SUT), strong
Correlation processed etc., to ensure that system under test (SUT) is generated without shutdown condition.
Step 4：Experiment is performed to selected test case.It is established using the maintenance network and system under test (SUT) of system under test (SUT)
Communication.Using the data for safeguarding network in system controller is protected and directly rewriting pilot passageway, experiment quilt is read in output terminal
Measured data, while comparison is made, and make conclusion (of pressure testing) according to experiment criterion and print out report with expected standard signal.
Step 5：After test, all force values are released, restore state and progress of the tested test system to before testing
Confirming, otherwise carry out positioning problems and troubleshooting, it is ensured that tested test system reverts to state before experiment, in order to avoid to protecting system
It impacts.
Claims (3)
1. a kind of nuclear power plant reactor protection system at regular intervals experiment T2 test methods, it is characterised in that：Include the following steps：
Step 1：Confirm that selected system under test (SUT) is in the state that can be tested；
Step 2：Test system to be measured is simultaneously placed in bypass state by selected system to be tested；
Step 3：The controller for protecting system is placed in service mode, verifies system mode value, and records system to be tested before experiment
The output valve of system generates journal file；
Step 4：Experiment is performed to selected test case；It is communicated using the maintenance network of system under test (SUT) with system under test (SUT) foundation；
Using the data for safeguarding network in system controller is protected and directly rewriting pilot passageway, experiment measurand is read in output terminal
According to, while comparison is made, and make conclusion (of pressure testing) according to experiment criterion and print out report with expected standard signal；
Step 5：After test, all force values are released, it is true to restore state and progress of the tested test system to before testing
To recognize, otherwise carry out positioning problems and troubleshooting, it is ensured that tested test system reverts to state before experiment, in order to avoid protection system is made
Into influence.
2. nuclear power plant reactor protection system at regular intervals experiment T2 test methods according to claim 1, it is characterised in that：Institute
The single step of two supportive test process of the step of stating or automated execution test, and Real-time Feedback result of the test.
3. nuclear power plant reactor protection system at regular intervals experiment T2 test methods according to claim 1, it is characterised in that：Institute
The step of stating three will also make corresponding safeguard procedures, including forbidding input and output value in system under test (SUT) and forcing correlation, with
Ensure that system under test (SUT) is generated without shutdown condition.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201711189132.3A CN108154943A (en) | 2017-11-24 | 2017-11-24 | Nuclear power plant reactor protection system at regular intervals experiment T2 test methods |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201711189132.3A CN108154943A (en) | 2017-11-24 | 2017-11-24 | Nuclear power plant reactor protection system at regular intervals experiment T2 test methods |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN108154943A true CN108154943A (en) | 2018-06-12 |
Family
ID=62469086
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201711189132.3A Pending CN108154943A (en) | 2017-11-24 | 2017-11-24 | Nuclear power plant reactor protection system at regular intervals experiment T2 test methods |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN108154943A (en) |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN108986938A (en) * | 2018-06-15 | 2018-12-11 | 国核自仪系统工程有限公司 | The shutdown condition response time test method of nuclear power plant reactor protection system |
Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN104299661A (en) * | 2014-10-11 | 2015-01-21 | 中广核工程有限公司 | Transient test control method and system used in debugging and starting process of nuclear power station |
| CN204740870U (en) * | 2015-04-24 | 2015-11-04 | 北京广利核系统工程有限公司 | A digital variety drive appearance accuse device for PWR |
| CN106405277A (en) * | 2016-08-26 | 2017-02-15 | 北京广利核系统工程有限公司 | Test device of main processing unit of nuclear power station protection system and test method |
-
2017
- 2017-11-24 CN CN201711189132.3A patent/CN108154943A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN104299661A (en) * | 2014-10-11 | 2015-01-21 | 中广核工程有限公司 | Transient test control method and system used in debugging and starting process of nuclear power station |
| CN204740870U (en) * | 2015-04-24 | 2015-11-04 | 北京广利核系统工程有限公司 | A digital variety drive appearance accuse device for PWR |
| CN106405277A (en) * | 2016-08-26 | 2017-02-15 | 北京广利核系统工程有限公司 | Test device of main processing unit of nuclear power station protection system and test method |
Non-Patent Citations (2)
| Title |
|---|
| 孙武 等: "核电安全级数字化仪控系统T2试验方案研究", 《核电子学与探测技术》 * |
| 马刚，康礼鸿: "核电厂数字化反应堆保护系统T2响应时间分析及测试", 《自动化博览》 * |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN108986938A (en) * | 2018-06-15 | 2018-12-11 | 国核自仪系统工程有限公司 | The shutdown condition response time test method of nuclear power plant reactor protection system |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN110428919B (en) | Method for designing reactivity control strategy of pressurized water reactor nuclear power plant based on symptoms | |
| CN107884672A (en) | A kind of routine test method of nuclear power plant's reactor protection system link circuit | |
| CN103675355A (en) | Anemometer monitoring method and system | |
| CN104240781B (en) | Signal distribution method and signal distribution system of digital instrument control system (DCS) of nuclear power plant | |
| CN108154943A (en) | Nuclear power plant reactor protection system at regular intervals experiment T2 test methods | |
| CN107622804A (en) | A kind of method to set up of fuel element rupture detection alarming value | |
| CN107291062B (en) | Logic function test device for nuclear-level digital instrument control system of pressurized water reactor nuclear power plant | |
| Jones et al. | System-aware security for nuclear power systems | |
| Pavlova et al. | Systematic approach for the analytical validation of Kozloduy NPP, VVER-1000/V320 symptom based emergency operating procedures | |
| CN104181420A (en) | Response time testing method and system of nuclear power station ATWS system | |
| Nasiri et al. | Assessment of PSA Level 2 for core catcher design using a combined probabilistic and deterministic method for a case study: IR-360 NPP | |
| Tjahyani et al. | The assessment of the radioactive releases from the confinement structure of AP1000 by probabilistic safety analysis | |
| Park et al. | Probabilistic risk evaluation of cyber attack on a nuclear power plant safety | |
| Hering et al. | Status of experimental and analytical investigations on degraded core reflood | |
| CN113487464B (en) | Nuclear power plant accident management method, device, computer equipment and storage medium | |
| Yuehua et al. | The Application of Fault Tree Method in Systematic Multiple Spurious Operation Analysis in Fire PSA | |
| Kim et al. | A Study on the Operation Strategy for Combined Accident including TLOFW accident | |
| Jo et al. | A Study on Improvements and Harmfulness for the Automatic Diagnostic Test of Interposing Logic System in NPPs | |
| Peng et al. | Assessment for Effect of RCS Depressurization and Reactor Cavity Flooding Using PSA Approach | |
| Martin | Design-Basis Event Characterization | |
| Peng et al. | Application of Probabilistic Safety Assessment in the Design of Instrumentation and Control Systems for Nuclear Power Plants | |
| LIU et al. | STUDY ON A FULL-SCOPE LEVEL 2 PROBABILITY SAFETY ASSESSMENT OF ACP100 IN CHINA | |
| Choi et al. | MELCOR simulation of in-vessel mitigation strategies by multiple actions using monte carlo method | |
| Hossen et al. | Analysis of Steam Line Break Accident Using PCTRAN Model of VVER-1200 NPP | |
| Phung et al. | Severity, causes and frequencies of pressure vessel thermal shock at US pressurized water reactors (1963–1981) |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |
Application publication date: 20180612 |