CN108054768A - Transient stability evaluation in power system method based on principal component analysis - Google Patents
Transient stability evaluation in power system method based on principal component analysis Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN108054768A CN108054768A CN201711352495.4A CN201711352495A CN108054768A CN 108054768 A CN108054768 A CN 108054768A CN 201711352495 A CN201711352495 A CN 201711352495A CN 108054768 A CN108054768 A CN 108054768A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- mrow
- msub
- principal component
- mtd
- delta
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H02—GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
- H02J—CIRCUIT ARRANGEMENTS OR SYSTEMS FOR SUPPLYING OR DISTRIBUTING ELECTRIC POWER; SYSTEMS FOR STORING ELECTRIC ENERGY
- H02J3/00—Circuit arrangements for ac mains or ac distribution networks
- H02J3/24—Arrangements for preventing or reducing oscillations of power in networks
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H02—GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
- H02J—CIRCUIT ARRANGEMENTS OR SYSTEMS FOR SUPPLYING OR DISTRIBUTING ELECTRIC POWER; SYSTEMS FOR STORING ELECTRIC ENERGY
- H02J2203/00—Indexing scheme relating to details of circuit arrangements for AC mains or AC distribution networks
- H02J2203/20—Simulating, e g planning, reliability check, modelling or computer assisted design [CAD]
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Power Engineering (AREA)
- Other Investigation Or Analysis Of Materials By Electrical Means (AREA)
- Supply And Distribution Of Alternating Current (AREA)
Abstract
The invention discloses a kind of transient stability evaluation in power system method based on principal component analysis, the time-domain traces at all generator amature angles in 25 cycles after failure removal are obtained based on WAMS systems, principal component analysis is carried out after standardization;It is more than 85% example for first principal component variance contribution ratio, builds first principal component virtual synchronous generator;Using the time as parameter, the rotor angle of first principal component virtual synchronous generator and corresponding equivalent output power, equivalent mechanical output are mapped in two-dimensional coordinate to the moment one by one, form the P δ images track of first principal component virtual synchronous generator.The stability margin of first principal component virtual synchronous generator is calculated using law of equal areas, this transient stability margin being calculated is denoted as the transient stability margin of primal system.The present invention is without modeling and simulation, it is only necessary to real-time response information after failure removal, you can judges system stability, realizes the on-line transient stability judgement based entirely on response.
Description
Technical field
The present invention relates to Power System Stability Assessment, more particularly to a kind of electrical power system transient based on principal component analysis
Stability assessment method.
Background technology
With the development of trans-regional interconnected network, the application of various new technologies and the implementation of policy so that electric system
Dynamic behaviour is more complicated and changeable, is more easy to trigger Solving Power System Transient Stability Problem.How electric system is rapidly and accurately judged
Transient stability is one of major issue of power system security prevention and control.
The method of existing transient stability evaluation in power system mainly has following a few classes:(1) time-domain-simulation method.This method is straight
Sight, informative are applicable to various element scales and large-scale electrical power system, but calculating speed it is slow, dependent on system mould
Type and parameter, the stability margin value that system cannot be directly given.(2) transient energy function method.This method can quickly be made surely
It is fixed to judge, it is not necessary to the running orbit of whole system, but the system that this method only considered naive model are calculated, it can only be steady to head pendulum
Qualitative to make assessment, analysis result is easily relatively conservative.(3) to expand law of equal areas (extended equal-area
Criterion, EEAC) be representative equivalent method.The estimation of transient stability that this method can quantify, but its assessment is correct
Property depend on critical machine correct identification.(4) mixing method.This method combines the advantages of time-domain-simulation method and direct method, together
When there is also the shortcomings that the two.(5) artificial intelligence method.This method can carry out the electric power system transient stability differentiation of non-model,
Have many advantages, such as that online calculating speed is fast, but cannot function as traditional replacement based on mechanism method, and be only capable of supplementing as it
Recent domestic has started one transient stability analysis of power system and the research boom of control based on response,
Research focuses primarily upon phase-swing curves trend prediction and machine learning both direction.It is however whether pre- based on phase-swing curves trend
Survey or the research of machine learning, but can not be to electric power system transient stability journey whether they are only capable of judging power system transient stability
Degree carries out quantitative evaluation.
The present invention overcomes the shortcomings of existing method on existing Research foundation, proposes a kind of electricity based on principal component analysis
Force system Transient Stability Evaluation method, this method realize the on-line transient stability based entirely on response without modeling and simulation
Property dimensionality reduction assessment and critical machine automatic identification, have a good application prospect.
The content of the invention
The technical problem to be solved in the present invention is to provide a kind of transient stability evaluation in power system based on principal component analysis
Method, to overcome problems of the prior art.
In order to solve the above technical problems, the present invention uses following technical proposals:
Based on rotor angle trace information principal component analysis after failure, the appraisal procedure of power system transient stability is carried out.
This method comprises the following steps:
Step (1) screens the data message that electric system collects based on WAMS systems, obtains failure removal
Afterwards in 25 cycles all generator amature angles time-domain traces, and form raw data set;
Step (2), is standardized the initial data first, then carries out principal component analysis;
Step (3) is more than 85% example for first principal component variance contribution ratio, and first is built using first principal component
Principal component virtual synchronous generator;
Step (4), the transient stability margin of first principal component virtual synchronous generator is calculated using law of equal areas, which is
For the transient stability margin of raw power system.
2. appraisal procedure according to claim 1, it is characterised in that:In the step (1), define electric system and be used to
Property angleWhereinMiInertia time for i-th of generator is normal
Number, n be generator number of units, δiFor the rotor angle under original coordinate system.Rotor angle of electric machine is issued in center of inertia system to be denoted asUnder some fault condition, all generator amature angles track of 25 cycles after fault clearance is obtained, in inertia
Track matrix is denoted as in center reference coordinate system:[δij]25×n。
3. appraisal procedure according to claim 1, it is characterised in that:In the step (2), to track Ju Zhen ﹛
δij﹜25×nCarry out principal component analysis.
First to matrix [δij]25×nIt is standardized:
In formula, i=1,2 ..., 25, j=1,2 ..., n,sjRespectively each generator observation index δjAverage and side
Difference.Standardize later matrix X:
Then, the covariance matrix R=(s of X are calculatedij)n×n:
The eigenvalue λ of R is obtainediAnd corresponding orthogonalization unit character vectorBy characteristic value from big
λ is shown to float1≥λ2≥…≥λm, λiCorresponding unit character vector uiIt is exactly principal component FiThe coefficient on former variable,
Then i-th of principal component F of former variableiFor:
Fi=ui1δ1+ui2δ2+…+uinδn
The variance contribution ratio of principal component is used for the size for reflecting information content, βiFor:
Finally to select several principal components is determined by accumulative variance contribution ratio G (m), and the expression formula of G (m) is:
When accumulative variance contribution ratio is more than 85%, the letter that these main variables reflect original variable enough is considered as
Breath, corresponding m is exactly the preceding m principal component extracted.
4. appraisal procedure according to claim 1, it is characterised in that:In the step (3), for first principal component
Variance contribution ratio is more than 85% example, extracts first principal component, builds first principal component virtual synchronous generator.First principal component is empty
The equation of rotor motion for sending out motor is expressed as:
In formula:
Wherein, F1For the rotor angle of first principal component virtual synchronous generator;w1For the rotor angle of first principal component virtual synchronous generator
Speed;ωnFor synchronous rotor angular speed;Pm、PeRespectively the equivalent mechanical output of first principal component virtual synchronous generator and equivalence are defeated
Go out power.
4. appraisal procedure according to claim 1, it is characterised in that:In the step (3), first principal component coefficient
To be an advanced group of planes on the occasion of corresponding generator, first principal component coefficient is that the generator corresponding to negative value is a hysteresis group of planes.
5. appraisal procedure according to claim 1, it is characterised in that:Using the time as parameter in the step (4),
The rotor angle of first principal component virtual synchronous generator and corresponding equivalent output power, equivalent mechanical output are mapped to the moment one by one
Into two-dimensional coordinate, the P- δ images track of first principal component virtual synchronous generator is formed.Using law of equal areas calculate first it is main into
Divide the stability margin of virtual synchronous generator, this transient stability margin being calculated is denoted as the transient stability margin of primal system.
Wherein law of equal areas calculation formula is as follows:
For unstability example, stability margin ηunIt is expressed as:
In formula:
Wherein AincThe kinetic energy of moment to excision time instant τ occurs for failure increases area;AdecIt it is the failure removal moment to not
The kinetic energy of stable equilibrium point UEP reduces area;δoFor before failure at system operating point first principal component virtual synchronous generator rotor
Angle;δτFor the rotor angle of failure removal moment first principal component virtual synchronous generator;δUEPFor first at unstable equilibrium point UEP
Principal component virtual synchronous generator rotor angle;PeFor the equivalent output power of first principal component virtual synchronous generator;PmIt is empty for first principal component
Send out the equivalent mechanical output of motor.
For stablizing example, the quadratic function that the preceding several points for first passing through first pendulum solstics FEP use redundancy higher is most
Small square law predicts the virtual power-angle curve of first pendulum solstics FEP to unstable equilibrium point UEP.If virtual Pe(δ) curve is:
Pe(δ)=a0+a1δ+a2δ2,a0≠0
A in formula0, a1, a2For unknown variable.
Stability margin η is expressed as:
In formula:
Wherein Adec.potRepresenting, which makes the image reach Instability state, also wants increased Implantation Energy, it can be
With by fabricating path P in P- δ planese(δ)、Pm(δ), δ axis and straight line δ=δFEPThe area that is enclosed is measured.A* decIt is cut for failure
Except the kinetic energy of time instant τ system at the FEP of solstics reduces area;δτFor failure removal moment first principal component virtual synchronous generator
Rotor angle;δFEPHeaded by put FEP at first principal component virtual synchronous generator rotor angle;δUEPHeaded by put UEP at first principal component
Virtual synchronous generator rotor angle;PeFor the equivalent output power of first principal component virtual synchronous generator;PmIt virtually generates electricity for first principal component
The equivalent mechanical output of machine.ηunValue range [- 1,0], ηunValue is smaller, and the unstable degree of system is bigger;The value model of η
It encloses [0,1], η values are bigger, and system stability margin is bigger.
Description of the drawings
The specific embodiment of the present invention is described in further detail below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings:
Fig. 1 shows a kind of signal of transient stability evaluation in power system method based on principal component analysis of the present invention
Figure;
Fig. 2 shows the topology diagram of 10 machine of New England, 39 node system in the present embodiment;
Fig. 3 shows 10 machine of New England, 39 node system example first principal component variance contribution ratio in the present embodiment;
Fig. 4 shows the first principal component virtual synchronous generator P- δ curves of 10 machine of the present embodiment, 39 node system example 1;
Fig. 5 shows the first principal component virtual synchronous generator P- δ curves of 10 machine of the present embodiment, 39 node system example 2.
Specific embodiment
The invention discloses one kind based on rotor angle trace information principal component analysis after failure, it is steady to carry out electrical power system transient
Qualitatively appraisal procedure.This method comprises the following steps:
Step (1) screens the data message that electric system collects based on WAMS systems, obtains failure removal
Afterwards in 25 cycles all generator amature angles time-domain traces, and form raw data set;
Step (2), is standardized the initial data first, then carries out principal component analysis;
Step (3) is more than 85% example for first principal component variance contribution ratio, and first is built using first principal component
Principal component virtual synchronous generator;
Step (4), the transient stability margin of first principal component virtual synchronous generator is calculated using law of equal areas, which is
For the transient stability margin of raw power system.
2. appraisal procedure according to claim 1, it is characterised in that:In the step (1), define electric system and be used to
Property angleWhereinMiInertia time for i-th of generator is normal
Number, n be generator number of units, δiFor the rotor angle under original coordinate system.Rotor angle of electric machine is issued in center of inertia system to be denoted asUnder some fault condition, all generator amature angles track of 25 cycles after fault clearance is obtained, in inertia
Track matrix is denoted as in center reference coordinate system:[δij]25×n。
3. appraisal procedure according to claim 1, it is characterised in that:In the step (2), to track Ju Zhen ﹛
δij﹜25×nCarry out principal component analysis.
First to matrix [δij]25×nIt is standardized:
In formula, i=1,2 ..., 25, j=1,2 ..., n,sjRespectively each generator observation index δjAverage and side
Difference.Standardize later matrix X:
Then, the covariance matrix R=(s of X are calculatedij)n×n:
The eigenvalue λ of R is obtainediAnd corresponding orthogonalization unit character vectorBy characteristic value from big
λ is shown to float1≥λ2≥…≥λm, λiCorresponding unit character vector uiIt is exactly principal component FiThe coefficient on former variable,
Then i-th of principal component F of former variableiFor:
Fi=ui1δ1+ui2δ2+…+uinδn
The variance contribution ratio of principal component is used for the size for reflecting information content, βiFor:
Finally to select several principal components is determined by accumulative variance contribution ratio G (m), and the expression formula of G (m) is:
When accumulative variance contribution ratio is more than 85%, the letter that these main variables reflect original variable enough is considered as
Breath, corresponding m is exactly the preceding m principal component extracted.
4. appraisal procedure according to claim 1, it is characterised in that:In the step (3), for first principal component
Variance contribution ratio is more than 85% example, extracts first principal component, builds first principal component virtual synchronous generator.First principal component is empty
The equation of rotor motion for sending out motor is expressed as:
In formula:
Wherein, F1For the rotor angle of first principal component virtual synchronous generator;w1For the rotor angle of first principal component virtual synchronous generator
Speed;ωnFor synchronous rotor angular speed;Pm、PeRespectively the equivalent mechanical output of first principal component virtual synchronous generator and equivalence are defeated
Go out power.
4. appraisal procedure according to claim 1, it is characterised in that:In the step (3), first principal component coefficient
To be an advanced group of planes on the occasion of corresponding generator, first principal component coefficient is that the generator corresponding to negative value is a hysteresis group of planes.
5. appraisal procedure according to claim 1, it is characterised in that:Using the time as parameter in the step (4),
The rotor angle of first principal component virtual synchronous generator and corresponding equivalent output power, equivalent mechanical output are mapped to the moment one by one
Into two-dimensional coordinate, the P- δ images track of first principal component virtual synchronous generator is formed.Using law of equal areas calculate first it is main into
Divide the stability margin of virtual synchronous generator, this transient stability margin being calculated is denoted as the transient stability margin of primal system.
Wherein law of equal areas calculation formula is as follows:
For unstability example, stability margin ηunIt is expressed as:
In formula:
Wherein AincThe kinetic energy of moment to excision time instant τ occurs for failure increases area;AdecIt it is the failure removal moment to not
The kinetic energy of stable equilibrium point UEP reduces area;δoFor before failure at system operating point first principal component virtual synchronous generator rotor
Angle;δτFor the rotor angle of failure removal moment first principal component virtual synchronous generator;δUEPFor first at unstable equilibrium point UEP
Principal component virtual synchronous generator rotor angle;PeFor the equivalent output power of first principal component virtual synchronous generator;PmIt is empty for first principal component
Send out the equivalent mechanical output of motor.
For stablizing example, the quadratic function that the preceding several points for first passing through first pendulum solstics FEP use redundancy higher is most
Small square law predicts the virtual power-angle curve of first pendulum solstics FEP to unstable equilibrium point UEP.If virtual Pe(δ) curve is:
Pe(δ)=a0+a1δ+a2δ2,a0≠0
A in formula0, a1, a2For unknown variable.
Stability margin η is expressed as:
In formula:
Wherein Adec.potRepresenting, which makes the image reach Instability state, also wants increased Implantation Energy, it can be
With by fabricating path P in P- δ planese(δ)、Pm(δ), δ axis and straight line δ=δFEPThe area that is enclosed is measured.A* decIt is cut for failure
Except the kinetic energy of time instant τ system at the FEP of solstics reduces area;δτFor failure removal moment first principal component virtual synchronous generator
Rotor angle;δFEPHeaded by put FEP at first principal component virtual synchronous generator rotor angle;δUEPHeaded by put UEP at first principal component
Virtual synchronous generator rotor angle;PeFor the equivalent output power of first principal component virtual synchronous generator;PmIt virtually generates electricity for first principal component
The equivalent mechanical output of machine.ηunValue range [- 1,0], ηunValue is smaller, and the unstable degree of system is bigger;The value model of η
It encloses [0,1], η values are bigger, and system stability margin is bigger.
Beneficial effects of the present invention are as follows:
Technical solution this method present invention of the present invention need not establish Power System Analysis model and emulation, according only to
The rotor angle of generator, mechanical output, output power information after the failure removal that WAMS systems obtain, directly to electric system
Transient stability is assessed, and realizes the on-line transient stability judgement based entirely on response.This method need not be to power train
System carries out snock swarming, has the ability of automatic identification criticality benchmark and Failure Model.With the expansion of system scale, this method
Only need to judge the stability characteristic (quality) of first principal component virtual synchronous generator, calculation amount is not significantly increased, the advantage compared with conventional method
It is more obvious.
Below by one group of embodiment, the invention will be further described:
The present embodiment is illustrated by taking 10 machine of New England, 39 node system as an example.System uses constant impedance load, bears
Lotus level sets 5 kinds of different generated outputs, three-phase shortcircuit is set among 34 circuits under 100% gauge load level
Failure, 5 cycle excision near terminal faults after failure occurs, 6 cycle excision far-end faults or 9 cycle excision near terminal faults,
10 cycles excision far-end faults or 19 cycles excision near terminal faults, 20 cycles cut off far-end faults, and symbiosis is into 5 × 34
× 3=510 example.Rotor angle trace information is by simulation software Power System Tool after the generator failure of PMU actual measurements
(PST) 3.0 obtained data of emulation are simulated, simulation frequency 60Hz.
The rotor angle trace information of 25 cycles, obtains after inertia central transformation at inertia center after extraction failure removal
Rotor angle trace information under coordinate system.Then principal component analysis is carried out to it, calculates the first principal component variance of each example
Contribution rate, as shown in Figure 3.
510 examples of 10 machine, 39 node system emulation generation as shown in Figure 3,100% example first principal component variance
Contribution rate is all higher than 85%, therefore according to the principle of Principle component extraction in multivariate statistics principal component analysis, first it is main into
Divide and contain most original generator amature angles trace information.Therefore the first principal component virtual synchronous generator of this method structure
Contain most information of primal system each unit rotor angle track.
Using the time as parameter, by the rotor angle of first principal component virtual synchronous generator and corresponding equivalent output power, etc.
Value mechanical output is mapped in two-dimensional coordinate to the moment one by one, forms the P- δ images track of first principal component virtual synchronous generator.
When disturbed track δ (t) unstability of first principal component virtual synchronous generator rotor angle, corresponding P- δ image curves must
Run into unstable equilibrium point (unstable equilibrium point, UEP).Unstability image stablizing before standardization is abundant
Spend ηunIt is expressed as:
ηun=Adec-Ainc (1)
The value can be turned to perunit:
In formula:
When first principal component virtual synchronous generator P- δ image curves run into first pendulum solstics (furthest equilibrium
Point, FEP) when, which can be judged to stablize, and there are A at this timedecWith AincIt is equal.Imagination is injected at FEP to the image
Additional kinetic energy, and assume that imaginary path of the image track after FEP has preferable autonomy, therefore this imaginary road
Footpath can be predicted by several points before FEP with the higher quadratic function least square method of redundancy.If virtual Pe(δ) is bent
Line is:
Pe=a0+a1δ+a2δ2,a0≠0 (5)
A in formula0, a1, a2For unknown variable.
Potential kinetic energy reduces area Adec.potRepresenting, which makes the image reach Instability state, also wants increased note
Enter energy, it can be in P- δ planes with by fabricating path Pe(δ)、Pm(δ), δ axis and straight line δ=δFEPThe area enclosed carrys out amount
Degree.Area (A can be reduced with total kinetic energy* dec+Adec.pot) and actual kinetic energy increase area AincDifference, i.e. Adec.potTo make
For the stability margin before standardization.And the stability margin η after standardization is:
In formula:
A* decArea, δ are reduced for the kinetic energy of failure removal time instant τ system at the FEP of solsticsoIt works for system before failure
The rotor angle of first principal component virtual synchronous generator, δ at pointτFor the rotor of failure removal moment first principal component virtual synchronous generator
Angle, δFEPHeaded by put FEP at first principal component virtual synchronous generator rotor angle, δUEPHeaded by put UEP at first principal component it is virtual
Generator amature angle.From formula (2), (6), ηunValue range [- 1,0], ηunValue is smaller, the unstable degree of system
It is bigger;The value range [0,1] of η, η values are bigger, and system stability margin is bigger.
In order to verify the correctness of the obtained stability of context of methods and degree of stability, introduce based on critical clearing time
(CCT) index M quantifies the degree of stability of primal system, and M index definitions are as follows:
M ∈ [- 1,1], M are more than zero, and system is stable state, more stable closer to 1 system;When M is equal to zero, system is to face
Boundary's state;M is less than zero, and system is instability status, and closer -1 system gets over unstability.tCCTValue can be by time-domain-simulation method repeatedly
Exploration obtains, tclFor the failure actual mute time.
Three phase short circuit fault occurs for 0s at the 50% of 1, No. 24 circuits of example, 9 cycles excisions are near after failure occurs
Failure is held, 10 cycles cut off far-end fault.To the generator of 25 cycles after the failure removal under 1 center of inertia system of example
Rotor angle information carries out principal component analysis, and it is as shown in table 1 to obtain first principal component coefficient.
1 10 machine of table, 39 node system example, 1 first principal component coefficient
It observes first principal component coefficient to find, the weight coefficient absolute value of each generator is close to equal, and busbar volume
Numbers 30~38 generator weight coefficient is positive value, and the generator weight coefficient of busbar number 39 is negative value.Busbar number 30~
38 generator weight coefficient is with the generator weight coefficient of busbar number 39 on the contrary, being walked with time-domain-simulation generator rocking curve
Gesture reverse phenomenon is consistent.Existing EEAC methods are that the generator of busbar number 30~38 is merged into unit before neck, weight
Equal is 1.0, and for the generator of busbar number 39 as hysteresis unit, equal weight is also 1.0.Subtract each other conjunction in two machine rotor angles
And into one machine infinity bus system, judge power system transient stability using law of equal areas.Compare both approaches, it is known that the first master
Ingredient coefficient is similar to the weight coefficient of each generator in EEAC methods, and more more objective than EEAC method.Because principal component point
Analysis method is the correlation between each generator obtained according to the real-time response data characteristics of system, and not artificially setting is each
The weight coefficient of a generator.As it can be seen that the weight that EEAC methods assign every generator is only the virtual synchronous generator method based on PCA
One limit special case.The weight coefficient that virtual synchronous generator method based on PCA provides realizes automatic identification Failure Model and critical
The function of unit.
According to the corresponding principal component coefficient structure first principal component virtual synchronous generator of first principal component.First principal component is virtual
Generator amature angle δ is:
The output power P of first principal component virtual synchronous generatoreFor:
The mechanical output P of first principal component virtual synchronous generatormFor:
MT=M30+M31+…+M39 (14)
The first principal component virtual synchronous generator P- δ curves of example 1 are as shown in figure 4, five jiaos of hearts of wherein first hollow out represent
The FEP of head pendulum, second hollow out, five jiaos of hearts represent virtual UEP, and horizontal linear represents first principal component virtual synchronous generator machinery
Power P m (δ), solid-line curve represent the output power Pe (δ) of first principal component virtual synchronous generator, and dotted line represents that FEP to UEP is empty
Pe (δ) track of structure.1 stability analysis data of example are as shown in table 2.
The stability analysis data of 2 10 machine of table, 39 node system example 1
As shown in Table 2, when the first pendulum of first principal component virtual synchronous generator rotor angle meets FEP, there is A* dec=Ainc.It utilizes
First principal component virtual synchronous generator stability margin η=0.4546 is calculated in formula (6), based on critical clearing time tCCTIt calculates
Obtained primal system stability indicator M=0.4706, it is seen that η is all positive number with M and numerical values recited is suitable, i.e. first principal component
The stability of virtual synchronous generator is consistent with the stability of primal system, is stable state.
Three phase short circuit fault occurs for 0s at the 50% of 2, No. 6 circuits of example, 19 cycles excisions are near after failure occurs
Failure is held, 20 cycles cut off far-end fault.The first principal component virtual synchronous generator equivalence power-angle curve of example 2 is as shown in Figure 5.
Curve represents the output power Pe (δ) of first principal component virtual synchronous generator in figure, and horizontal linear represents that first principal component is virtually sent out
Electromechanics power P m (δ), five jiaos of hearts of hollow out represent UEP.2 stability analysis data of example are as shown in table 3.
The stability analysis data of 3 10 machine of table, 39 node system example 2
As shown in Table 3, first principal component virtual synchronous generator stability margin ηun=-0.9087, based on critical clearing time tCCT
The primal system stability indicator M=-0.8947 being calculated.It can be seen that ηunWith M be all negative and numerical values recited is suitable, i.e.,
The stability of first principal component virtual synchronous generator and primal system are instability status.
10 machine, 39 node system part sample calculation analysis the results are shown in Table 4.Through simulating, verifying, when first principal component is virtual in table 4
When the first pendulum in generator amature angle meets FEP, there is A* dec=Ainc, therefore stable example can be calculated using formula (6)
Stability margin η;When first principal component virtual synchronous generator rotor angle has passed through UEP, η is calculated using formula (2)un, so as to obtain
The stability margin η of unstability exampleun。
4 10 machine of table, 39 node system stability analysis result
As can be seen from Table 4:The two kinds of stability margin index numerical value calculated herein based on PCA methods and time-domain-simulation method
Sign is identical, and order of magnitude is suitable.The transient stability of first principal component virtual synchronous generator has with primal system stability
There is uniformity, the first principal component virtual synchronous generator based on Principal Component Analysis structure can be used for the transient stability of multi-computer system
Assessment.
Obviously, the above embodiment of the present invention is just for the sake of removing the citing for illustrating that the present invention carries out, and it is pair to be not
The restriction of embodiments of the present invention, for those of ordinary skill in the art, on the basis of above description can be with
Other various forms of variations or variation are made, can not give exhaustion to all way of example here, it is every to belong to this hair
The obvious changes or variations that bright technical solution is extended out is still in the row of protection scope of the present invention.
Claims (6)
1. the transient stability evaluation in power system method based on principal component analysis, which is characterized in that the step of the method includes:
Step (1) is screened the data message that electric system collects based on WAMS systems, is obtained 25 after failure removal
The time-domain traces at all generator amature angles in cycle, and form raw data set;
Step (2), is standardized the initial data first, then carries out principal component analysis;
Step (3), for first principal component variance contribution ratio be more than 85% example, using first principal component structure first it is main into
Divide virtual synchronous generator;
Step (4), the transient stability margin of first principal component virtual synchronous generator is calculated using law of equal areas, which is original
The transient stability margin of beginning electric system.
2. appraisal procedure according to claim 1, it is characterised in that:In the step (1), define in electric system inertia
Heart angleWhereinMiFor the inertia time constant of i-th of generator, n
For generator number of units, δiFor the rotor angle under original coordinate system.Rotor angle of electric machine is issued in center of inertia system to be denoted asUnder some fault condition, all generator amature angles track of 25 cycles after fault clearance is obtained, in inertia
Track matrix is denoted as in center reference coordinate system:[δij]25×n。
3. appraisal procedure according to claim 1, it is characterised in that:In the step (2), to track Ju Zhen ﹛ δij﹜25×n
Carry out principal component analysis.
First to matrix [δij]25×nIt is standardized:
<mrow>
<msup>
<msub>
<mi>&delta;</mi>
<mrow>
<mi>i</mi>
<mi>j</mi>
</mrow>
</msub>
<mo>*</mo>
</msup>
<mo>=</mo>
<mfrac>
<mrow>
<msub>
<mi>&delta;</mi>
<mrow>
<mi>i</mi>
<mi>j</mi>
</mrow>
</msub>
<mo>-</mo>
<msub>
<mover>
<mi>&delta;</mi>
<mo>&OverBar;</mo>
</mover>
<mi>j</mi>
</msub>
</mrow>
<msub>
<mi>s</mi>
<mi>j</mi>
</msub>
</mfrac>
</mrow>
In formula, i=1,2 ..., 25, j=1,2 ..., n,sjRespectively each generator observation index δjAverage and variance.
Standardize later matrix X:
<mrow>
<mi>X</mi>
<mo>=</mo>
<mfenced open = "[" close = "]">
<mtable>
<mtr>
<mtd>
<mrow>
<msup>
<msub>
<mi>&delta;</mi>
<mn>11</mn>
</msub>
<mo>*</mo>
</msup>
</mrow>
</mtd>
<mtd>
<mrow>
<msup>
<msub>
<mi>&delta;</mi>
<mn>12</mn>
</msub>
<mo>*</mo>
</msup>
</mrow>
</mtd>
<mtd>
<mo>...</mo>
</mtd>
<mtd>
<mrow>
<msup>
<msub>
<mi>&delta;</mi>
<mrow>
<mn>1</mn>
<mi>n</mi>
</mrow>
</msub>
<mo>*</mo>
</msup>
</mrow>
</mtd>
</mtr>
<mtr>
<mtd>
<mrow>
<msup>
<msub>
<mi>&delta;</mi>
<mn>21</mn>
</msub>
<mo>*</mo>
</msup>
</mrow>
</mtd>
<mtd>
<mrow>
<msup>
<msub>
<mi>&delta;</mi>
<mn>22</mn>
</msub>
<mo>*</mo>
</msup>
</mrow>
</mtd>
<mtd>
<mo>...</mo>
</mtd>
<mtd>
<mrow>
<msup>
<msub>
<mi>&delta;</mi>
<mrow>
<mn>2</mn>
<mi>n</mi>
</mrow>
</msub>
<mo>*</mo>
</msup>
</mrow>
</mtd>
</mtr>
<mtr>
<mtd>
<mo>...</mo>
</mtd>
<mtd>
<mo>...</mo>
</mtd>
<mtd>
<mo>...</mo>
</mtd>
<mtd>
<mo>...</mo>
</mtd>
</mtr>
<mtr>
<mtd>
<mrow>
<msup>
<msub>
<mi>&delta;</mi>
<mn>251</mn>
</msub>
<mo>*</mo>
</msup>
</mrow>
</mtd>
<mtd>
<mrow>
<msup>
<msub>
<mi>&delta;</mi>
<mn>252</mn>
</msub>
<mo>*</mo>
</msup>
</mrow>
</mtd>
<mtd>
<mo>...</mo>
</mtd>
<mtd>
<mrow>
<msup>
<msub>
<mi>&delta;</mi>
<mrow>
<mn>25</mn>
<mi>n</mi>
</mrow>
</msub>
<mo>*</mo>
</msup>
</mrow>
</mtd>
</mtr>
</mtable>
</mfenced>
</mrow>
Then, the covariance matrix R=(s of X are calculatedij)n×n:
<mrow>
<msub>
<mi>s</mi>
<mrow>
<mi>i</mi>
<mi>j</mi>
</mrow>
</msub>
<mo>=</mo>
<mfrac>
<mn>1</mn>
<mrow>
<mn>25</mn>
<mo>-</mo>
<mn>1</mn>
</mrow>
</mfrac>
<munderover>
<mo>&Sigma;</mo>
<mrow>
<mi>k</mi>
<mo>=</mo>
<mn>1</mn>
</mrow>
<mn>25</mn>
</munderover>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<msubsup>
<mi>&delta;</mi>
<mrow>
<mi>k</mi>
<mi>i</mi>
</mrow>
<mo>*</mo>
</msubsup>
<mo>-</mo>
<mover>
<msubsup>
<mi>&delta;</mi>
<mi>i</mi>
<mo>*</mo>
</msubsup>
<mo>&OverBar;</mo>
</mover>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<msubsup>
<mi>&delta;</mi>
<mrow>
<mi>k</mi>
<mi>j</mi>
</mrow>
<mo>*</mo>
</msubsup>
<mo>-</mo>
<mover>
<msubsup>
<mi>&delta;</mi>
<mi>j</mi>
<mo>*</mo>
</msubsup>
<mo>&OverBar;</mo>
</mover>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<mo>,</mo>
<mi>i</mi>
<mo>,</mo>
<mi>j</mi>
<mo>=</mo>
<mn>1</mn>
<mo>,</mo>
<mn>2</mn>
<mo>,</mo>
<mn>...</mn>
<mo>,</mo>
<mi>n</mi>
</mrow>
The eigenvalue λ of R is obtainediAnd corresponding orthogonalization unit character vector ui=[ui1,ui2,…,uin]Xia.By characteristic value from big
λ is shown to float1≥λ2≥…≥λm, λiCorresponding unit character vector uiIt is exactly principal component FiThe coefficient on former variable,
Then i-th of principal component F of former variableiFor:
Fi=ui1δ1+ui2δ2+…+uinδn
The variance contribution ratio of principal component is used for the size for reflecting information content, βiFor:
<mrow>
<msub>
<mi>&beta;</mi>
<mi>i</mi>
</msub>
<mo>=</mo>
<msub>
<mi>&lambda;</mi>
<mi>i</mi>
</msub>
<mo>/</mo>
<munderover>
<mo>&Sigma;</mo>
<mi>i</mi>
<mi>m</mi>
</munderover>
<msub>
<mi>&lambda;</mi>
<mi>i</mi>
</msub>
<mo>,</mo>
<mi>i</mi>
<mo>=</mo>
<mn>1</mn>
<mo>,</mo>
<mn>2</mn>
<mo>,</mo>
<mn>...</mn>
<mo>,</mo>
<mi>m</mi>
</mrow>
Finally to select several principal components is determined by accumulative variance contribution ratio G (m), and the expression formula of G (m) is:
<mrow>
<mi>G</mi>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mi>m</mi>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<mo>=</mo>
<munderover>
<mo>&Sigma;</mo>
<mi>i</mi>
<mi>m</mi>
</munderover>
<msub>
<mi>&lambda;</mi>
<mi>i</mi>
</msub>
<mo>/</mo>
<munderover>
<mo>&Sigma;</mo>
<mi>k</mi>
<mi>n</mi>
</munderover>
<msub>
<mi>&lambda;</mi>
<mi>k</mi>
</msub>
</mrow>
When accumulative variance contribution ratio is more than 85%, the information that these main variables reflect original variable enough is considered as, it is right
The m answered is exactly the preceding m principal component extracted.
4. appraisal procedure according to claim 1, it is characterised in that:In the step (3), for first principal component variance
Contribution rate is more than 85% example, extracts first principal component, builds first principal component virtual synchronous generator.First principal component is virtually sent out
The equation of rotor motion of motor is expressed as:
<mfenced open = "{" close = "">
<mtable>
<mtr>
<mtd>
<mrow>
<mfrac>
<mrow>
<msub>
<mi>dF</mi>
<mn>1</mn>
</msub>
</mrow>
<mrow>
<mi>d</mi>
<mi>t</mi>
</mrow>
</mfrac>
<mo>=</mo>
<msub>
<mi>w</mi>
<mn>1</mn>
</msub>
<mo>-</mo>
<msub>
<mi>&omega;</mi>
<mi>n</mi>
</msub>
</mrow>
</mtd>
</mtr>
<mtr>
<mtd>
<mrow>
<msub>
<mi>M</mi>
<mi>T</mi>
</msub>
<mfrac>
<mrow>
<msub>
<mi>dw</mi>
<mn>1</mn>
</msub>
</mrow>
<mrow>
<mi>d</mi>
<mi>t</mi>
</mrow>
</mfrac>
<mo>=</mo>
<msub>
<mi>P</mi>
<mi>m</mi>
</msub>
<mo>-</mo>
<msub>
<mi>P</mi>
<mi>e</mi>
</msub>
</mrow>
</mtd>
</mtr>
</mtable>
</mfenced>
In formula:
<mrow>
<msub>
<mi>M</mi>
<mi>T</mi>
</msub>
<mo>=</mo>
<munderover>
<mo>&Sigma;</mo>
<mrow>
<mi>i</mi>
<mo>=</mo>
<mn>1</mn>
</mrow>
<mi>n</mi>
</munderover>
<msub>
<mi>M</mi>
<mi>i</mi>
</msub>
<mo>,</mo>
<mi>i</mi>
<mo>=</mo>
<mn>1</mn>
<mo>,</mo>
<mn>2</mn>
<mo>,</mo>
<mn>...</mn>
<mo>,</mo>
<mi>n</mi>
<mo>;</mo>
</mrow>
<mrow>
<msub>
<mi>P</mi>
<mi>m</mi>
</msub>
<mo>=</mo>
<msub>
<mi>M</mi>
<mi>T</mi>
</msub>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mfrac>
<mrow>
<msub>
<mi>u</mi>
<mn>11</mn>
</msub>
<msub>
<mi>P</mi>
<mrow>
<mi>m</mi>
<mn>1</mn>
</mrow>
</msub>
</mrow>
<msub>
<mi>M</mi>
<mn>1</mn>
</msub>
</mfrac>
<mo>+</mo>
<mfrac>
<mrow>
<msub>
<mi>u</mi>
<mn>12</mn>
</msub>
<msub>
<mi>P</mi>
<mrow>
<mi>m</mi>
<mn>2</mn>
</mrow>
</msub>
</mrow>
<msub>
<mi>M</mi>
<mn>2</mn>
</msub>
</mfrac>
<mo>+</mo>
<mn>...</mn>
<mo>+</mo>
<mfrac>
<mrow>
<msub>
<mi>u</mi>
<mrow>
<mn>1</mn>
<mi>n</mi>
</mrow>
</msub>
<msub>
<mi>P</mi>
<mrow>
<mi>m</mi>
<mi>n</mi>
</mrow>
</msub>
</mrow>
<msub>
<mi>M</mi>
<mi>n</mi>
</msub>
</mfrac>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<mo>;</mo>
</mrow>
<mrow>
<msub>
<mi>P</mi>
<mi>e</mi>
</msub>
<mo>=</mo>
<msub>
<mi>M</mi>
<mi>T</mi>
</msub>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mfrac>
<mrow>
<msub>
<mi>u</mi>
<mn>11</mn>
</msub>
<msub>
<mi>P</mi>
<mrow>
<mi>e</mi>
<mn>1</mn>
</mrow>
</msub>
</mrow>
<msub>
<mi>M</mi>
<mn>1</mn>
</msub>
</mfrac>
<mo>+</mo>
<mfrac>
<mrow>
<msub>
<mi>u</mi>
<mn>12</mn>
</msub>
<msub>
<mi>P</mi>
<mrow>
<mi>e</mi>
<mn>2</mn>
</mrow>
</msub>
</mrow>
<msub>
<mi>M</mi>
<mn>2</mn>
</msub>
</mfrac>
<mo>+</mo>
<mn>...</mn>
<mo>+</mo>
<mfrac>
<mrow>
<msub>
<mi>u</mi>
<mrow>
<mn>1</mn>
<mi>n</mi>
</mrow>
</msub>
<msub>
<mi>P</mi>
<mrow>
<mi>e</mi>
<mi>n</mi>
</mrow>
</msub>
</mrow>
<msub>
<mi>M</mi>
<mi>n</mi>
</msub>
</mfrac>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<mo>+</mo>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<msub>
<mi>u</mi>
<mn>11</mn>
</msub>
<mo>+</mo>
<msub>
<mi>u</mi>
<mn>12</mn>
</msub>
<mo>+</mo>
<mn>...</mn>
<mo>+</mo>
<msub>
<mi>u</mi>
<mrow>
<mn>1</mn>
<mi>n</mi>
</mrow>
</msub>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<msub>
<mi>P</mi>
<mrow>
<mi>C</mi>
<mi>O</mi>
<mi>I</mi>
</mrow>
</msub>
<mo>;</mo>
</mrow>
<mrow>
<msub>
<mi>P</mi>
<mrow>
<mi>C</mi>
<mi>O</mi>
<mi>I</mi>
</mrow>
</msub>
<mo>=</mo>
<munderover>
<mo>&Sigma;</mo>
<mrow>
<mi>i</mi>
<mo>=</mo>
<mn>1</mn>
</mrow>
<mi>n</mi>
</munderover>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<msub>
<mi>P</mi>
<mrow>
<mi>m</mi>
<mi>i</mi>
</mrow>
</msub>
<mo>-</mo>
<msub>
<mi>P</mi>
<mrow>
<mi>e</mi>
<mi>i</mi>
</mrow>
</msub>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<mo>,</mo>
<mi>i</mi>
<mo>=</mo>
<mn>1</mn>
<mo>,</mo>
<mn>2</mn>
<mo>,</mo>
<mn>...</mn>
<mo>,</mo>
<mi>n</mi>
<mo>;</mo>
</mrow>
Wherein, F1For the rotor angle of first principal component virtual synchronous generator;w1For the rotor angle speed of first principal component virtual synchronous generator
Degree;ωnFor synchronous rotor angular speed;Pm、PeThe respectively equivalent mechanical output of first principal component virtual synchronous generator and equivalent output
Power.
5. appraisal procedure according to claim 1, it is characterised in that:In the step (3), first principal component coefficient is just
The corresponding generator of value is an advanced group of planes, and first principal component coefficient is that the generator corresponding to negative value is a hysteresis group of planes.
6. appraisal procedure according to claim 1, it is characterised in that:Using the time as parameter in the step (4), by
The rotor angle of one principal component virtual synchronous generator and corresponding equivalent output power, equivalent mechanical output are mapped to two to the moment one by one
In dimension coordinate, the P- δ images track of first principal component virtual synchronous generator is formed.It is empty that first principal component is calculated using law of equal areas
The stability margin of motor is sent out, this transient stability margin being calculated is denoted as the transient stability margin of primal system.
Wherein law of equal areas calculation formula is as follows:
For unstability example, stability margin ηunIt is expressed as:
<mrow>
<msub>
<mi>&eta;</mi>
<mrow>
<mi>u</mi>
<mi>n</mi>
</mrow>
</msub>
<mo>=</mo>
<mfrac>
<mrow>
<msub>
<mi>A</mi>
<mrow>
<mi>d</mi>
<mi>e</mi>
<mi>c</mi>
</mrow>
</msub>
<mo>-</mo>
<msub>
<mi>A</mi>
<mrow>
<mi>i</mi>
<mi>n</mi>
<mi>c</mi>
</mrow>
</msub>
</mrow>
<msub>
<mi>A</mi>
<mrow>
<mi>i</mi>
<mi>n</mi>
<mi>c</mi>
</mrow>
</msub>
</mfrac>
<mo>&times;</mo>
<mn>100</mn>
<mi>%</mi>
<mo><</mo>
<mn>0</mn>
</mrow>
In formula:
<mrow>
<msub>
<mi>A</mi>
<mrow>
<mi>i</mi>
<mi>n</mi>
<mi>c</mi>
</mrow>
</msub>
<mo>=</mo>
<munderover>
<mo>&Integral;</mo>
<msub>
<mi>&delta;</mi>
<mi>o</mi>
</msub>
<msub>
<mi>&delta;</mi>
<mi>&tau;</mi>
</msub>
</munderover>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<msub>
<mi>P</mi>
<mi>m</mi>
</msub>
<mo>-</mo>
<msub>
<mi>P</mi>
<mi>e</mi>
</msub>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<mi>d</mi>
<mi>&delta;</mi>
</mrow>
<mrow>
<msub>
<mi>A</mi>
<mrow>
<mi>de</mi>
<mi>c</mi>
</mrow>
</msub>
<mo>=</mo>
<munderover>
<mo>&Integral;</mo>
<msub>
<mi>&delta;</mi>
<mi>&tau;</mi>
</msub>
<msub>
<mi>&delta;</mi>
<mrow>
<mi>U</mi>
<mi>E</mi>
<mi>P</mi>
</mrow>
</msub>
</munderover>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<msub>
<mi>P</mi>
<mi>e</mi>
</msub>
<mo>-</mo>
<msub>
<mi>P</mi>
<mi>m</mi>
</msub>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<mi>d</mi>
<mi>&delta;</mi>
</mrow>
Wherein AincThe kinetic energy of moment to excision time instant τ occurs for failure increases area;AdecIt it is the failure removal moment to unstable
The kinetic energy of equalization point UEP reduces area;δoFor before failure at system operating point first principal component virtual synchronous generator rotor angle;δτ
For the rotor angle of failure removal moment first principal component virtual synchronous generator;δUEPFor the first principal component at unstable equilibrium point UEP
Virtual synchronous generator rotor angle;PeFor the equivalent output power of first principal component virtual synchronous generator;PmIt virtually generates electricity for first principal component
The equivalent mechanical output of machine.
For stablizing example, preceding several points of first pendulum solstics FEP are first passed through with the higher quadratic function minimum two of redundancy
Multiplication predicts the virtual power-angle curve of first pendulum solstics FEP to unstable equilibrium point UEP.If virtual Pe(δ) curve is:
Pe(δ)=a0+a1δ+a2δ2,a0≠0
A in formula0, a1, a2For unknown variable.
Stability margin η is expressed as:
<mrow>
<mi>&eta;</mi>
<mo>=</mo>
<mfrac>
<msub>
<mi>A</mi>
<mrow>
<mi>d</mi>
<mi>e</mi>
<mi>c</mi>
<mo>.</mo>
<mi>p</mi>
<mi>o</mi>
<mi>t</mi>
</mrow>
</msub>
<mrow>
<msubsup>
<mi>A</mi>
<mrow>
<mi>d</mi>
<mi>e</mi>
<mi>c</mi>
</mrow>
<mo>*</mo>
</msubsup>
<mo>+</mo>
<msub>
<mi>A</mi>
<mrow>
<mi>d</mi>
<mi>e</mi>
<mi>c</mi>
<mo>.</mo>
<mi>p</mi>
<mi>o</mi>
<mi>t</mi>
</mrow>
</msub>
</mrow>
</mfrac>
<mo>&times;</mo>
<mn>100</mn>
<mi>%</mi>
</mrow>
In formula:
<mrow>
<msub>
<mi>A</mi>
<mrow>
<mi>d</mi>
<mi>e</mi>
<mi>c</mi>
<mo>.</mo>
<mi>p</mi>
<mi>o</mi>
<mi>t</mi>
</mrow>
</msub>
<mo>=</mo>
<munderover>
<mo>&Integral;</mo>
<msub>
<mi>&delta;</mi>
<mrow>
<mi>F</mi>
<mi>E</mi>
<mi>P</mi>
</mrow>
</msub>
<msub>
<mi>&delta;</mi>
<mrow>
<mi>U</mi>
<mi>E</mi>
<mi>P</mi>
</mrow>
</msub>
</munderover>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<msub>
<mi>P</mi>
<mi>m</mi>
</msub>
<mo>-</mo>
<msub>
<mi>P</mi>
<mi>e</mi>
</msub>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<mi>d</mi>
<mi>&delta;</mi>
</mrow>
<mrow>
<msubsup>
<mi>A</mi>
<mrow>
<mi>d</mi>
<mi>e</mi>
<mi>c</mi>
</mrow>
<mo>*</mo>
</msubsup>
<mo>=</mo>
<munderover>
<mo>&Integral;</mo>
<msub>
<mi>&delta;</mi>
<mi>&tau;</mi>
</msub>
<msub>
<mi>&delta;</mi>
<mrow>
<mi>F</mi>
<mi>E</mi>
<mi>P</mi>
</mrow>
</msub>
</munderover>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<msub>
<mi>P</mi>
<mi>e</mi>
</msub>
<mo>-</mo>
<msub>
<mi>P</mi>
<mi>m</mi>
</msub>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<mi>d</mi>
<mi>&delta;</mi>
</mrow>
Wherein Adec.potRepresenting, which makes the image reach Instability state, also wants increased Implantation Energy, it can put down in P- δ
With by fabricating path P on facee(δ)、Pm(δ), δ axis and straight line δ=δFEPThe area that is enclosed is measured.A* decFor the failure removal moment
The kinetic energy of τ systems at the FEP of solstics reduces area;δτFor the rotor of failure removal moment first principal component virtual synchronous generator
Angle;δFEPHeaded by put FEP at first principal component virtual synchronous generator rotor angle;δUEPHeaded by put UEP at first principal component it is virtual
Generator amature angle;PeFor the equivalent output power of first principal component virtual synchronous generator;PmFor first principal component virtual synchronous generator
Equivalent mechanical output.ηunValue range [- 1,0], ηunValue is smaller, and the unstable degree of system is bigger;η value range [0,
1], η values are bigger, and system stability margin is bigger.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201711352495.4A CN108054768B (en) | 2017-12-15 | 2017-12-15 | Power system transient stability evaluation method based on principal component analysis |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201711352495.4A CN108054768B (en) | 2017-12-15 | 2017-12-15 | Power system transient stability evaluation method based on principal component analysis |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN108054768A true CN108054768A (en) | 2018-05-18 |
CN108054768B CN108054768B (en) | 2021-06-18 |
Family
ID=62133363
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN201711352495.4A Active CN108054768B (en) | 2017-12-15 | 2017-12-15 | Power system transient stability evaluation method based on principal component analysis |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN108054768B (en) |
Cited By (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN109494765A (en) * | 2018-11-13 | 2019-03-19 | 北京交通大学 | Alternating current-direct current combined hybrid system transient stability control method based on EEAC |
CN112069727A (en) * | 2020-08-20 | 2020-12-11 | 国网河南省电力公司经济技术研究院 | Intelligent transient stability evaluation system and method with high reliability for power system |
CN113659575A (en) * | 2021-10-19 | 2021-11-16 | 武汉理工大学 | Method and device for predicting transient stability of power system |
-
2017
- 2017-12-15 CN CN201711352495.4A patent/CN108054768B/en active Active
Cited By (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN109494765A (en) * | 2018-11-13 | 2019-03-19 | 北京交通大学 | Alternating current-direct current combined hybrid system transient stability control method based on EEAC |
CN112069727A (en) * | 2020-08-20 | 2020-12-11 | 国网河南省电力公司经济技术研究院 | Intelligent transient stability evaluation system and method with high reliability for power system |
CN112069727B (en) * | 2020-08-20 | 2022-10-21 | 国网河南省电力公司经济技术研究院 | Intelligent transient stability evaluation system and method with high reliability for power system |
CN113659575A (en) * | 2021-10-19 | 2021-11-16 | 武汉理工大学 | Method and device for predicting transient stability of power system |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN108054768B (en) | 2021-06-18 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN102074955B (en) | Method based on knowledge discovery technology for stability assessment and control of electric system | |
Qi et al. | Nonlinear model reduction in power systems by balancing of empirical controllability and observability covariances | |
CN108832619A (en) | Transient stability evaluation in power system method based on convolutional neural networks | |
Yu et al. | An unscented particle filtering approach to decentralized dynamic state estimation for DFIG wind turbines in multi-area power systems | |
CN108732528A (en) | A kind of digitalized electrical energy meter method for diagnosing faults based on depth confidence network | |
CN103700036B (en) | A kind of transient stability projecting integral method being suitable to power system Multiple Time Scales | |
CN108667005B (en) | Power grid static and dynamic combination vulnerability assessment method considering new energy influence | |
CN108092319A (en) | A kind of Uncertainty Analysis Method and device of short-term wind-electricity power prediction | |
CN108054768A (en) | Transient stability evaluation in power system method based on principal component analysis | |
Gou et al. | Novel pair‐wise relative energy function for transient stability analysis and real‐time emergency control | |
CN110417005A (en) | In conjunction with the transient stability catastrophe failure screening technique of deep learning and simulation calculation | |
CN105071380A (en) | Power system wide-area coherency identification method and device | |
CN104156542A (en) | Implicit-projection-based method for simulating stability of active power distribution system | |
CN105023121A (en) | Method for comprehensively evaluating influences imposed on power distribution network by distributed power supply access | |
CN112821424A (en) | Power system frequency response analysis method based on data-model fusion drive | |
CN115640748A (en) | Dynamic frequency response prediction method for generators after disturbance of power system | |
CN103311960A (en) | Method for dividing coherent stability regions of strong-connection power grids | |
Hu et al. | Frequency prediction model combining ISFR model and LSTM network | |
He et al. | Power system frequency situation prediction method based on transfer learning | |
CN117767275A (en) | Method and system for monitoring voltage support strength in real time, storage medium and electronic equipment | |
CN103606952B (en) | A kind of machine of cutting control measure quantization method based on system acceleration energy | |
Liu et al. | Transient rotor angle stability prediction based on deep belief network and long short-term memory network | |
Saunders et al. | Transient stability analysis using potential energy indices for determining critical generator sets | |
Ma et al. | Frequency security assessment for receiving-end system based on deep learning method | |
CN105808825B (en) | A kind of roller accidental projection integration method suitable for active power distribution network dynamic simulation |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PB01 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
GR01 | Patent grant |