CN107945840A - The evaluation method and device of electronic health record - Google Patents

The evaluation method and device of electronic health record Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN107945840A
CN107945840A CN201711064093.4A CN201711064093A CN107945840A CN 107945840 A CN107945840 A CN 107945840A CN 201711064093 A CN201711064093 A CN 201711064093A CN 107945840 A CN107945840 A CN 107945840A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
attribute item
evaluation
case history
default
score value
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
CN201711064093.4A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
刘莉
罗常进
蒋太鹏
陈斌
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Individual
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Priority to CN201711064093.4A priority Critical patent/CN107945840A/en
Publication of CN107945840A publication Critical patent/CN107945840A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Medical Treatment And Welfare Office Work (AREA)

Abstract

The embodiment of the invention discloses a kind of evaluation method of electronic health record, including:The electronic health record of selection is obtained as target case history, at least one attribute item of acquisition target case history;At least one attribute item got and corresponding property value evaluation component are shown on default case history displaying interface, and property value evaluation component includes at least one evaluation label;Determine that user is used as objective appraisal label by the evaluation label that the property value evaluation component of displaying selects;According to default evaluation label and the correspondence and objective appraisal label between score value are evaluated, determines corresponding attribute item evaluation score value;According to default case history evaluation algorithms and attribute item corresponding with least one attribute item evaluation score value, overall merit score value corresponding with target case history is calculated, and overall merit score value is shown on default case history displaying interface.Using the present invention, running electronic health record can be evaluated, and the accuracy of case history evaluation is improved compared to the prior art.

Description

The evaluation method and device of electronic health record
Technical field
The present invention relates to the evaluation method and dress of medicine and electronic health record technical field, more particularly to a kind of electronic health record Put.
Background technology
The institute-level case history Quality Control of traditional hospital is mainly terminal medical record Quality Control, i.e., the case history filed is spot-check or Person's emphasis disease key departments are checked, change case history or punishment again after pinpointing the problems, the side checked when this Although raising of the method to quality of case history is helpful, because being checked just for the case history filed, lived for patient Case history gap filling macadam during institute can not be monitored well, and which results in go out during being in hospital, performing the operation etc. in patient When having showed medical tangle, the quality for the case history sealed up for safekeeping can not be guaranteed, and be unfavorable for reducing the unfavorable factor in medical tangle, It is unfavorable for promoting quality of medical care and patient safety.That is, it is necessary to check the quality for running case history.
Operation case history Quality Control refer to the inspection of case history will advanceed in hospital during, and with the diagnosis and treatment of clinician Journey is synchronous, i.e., since patient is admitted to hospital ing, when discharge completes, can be directed to the arbitrary period that patient is in hospital case history check with Quality Control, so as to really improve the precision of the quality of case history and medical data.It is also, perfect with information system With the popularization of computer management system, electronic health record gradually instead of the case history of papery, and most hospitals employ electronics Case history, this, which allows for relevant section office, can check the case history of all patients in real time;The research and development of electronic health record quality control system, Electronic health record using when just have begun to, but time of case history completion, project Quality Control, logic Quality Control etc. are only limitted to, in case history Contain Quality Control be that computer system can not also be realized, therefore at present electronic health record Quality Control still according to it is traditional to terminal medical record into The method of the hand inspection of row Quality Control checks operation case history, it is necessary to put into substantial amounts of manpower, also, in traditional case history In inspection method, be it is artificial manual case history is checked on the whole, determine case history with the presence or absence of some gaps and omissions or Incomplete place, finally provides a fraction on the whole, that is to say, that for same a case history, because checked The different evaluation scores to case history of personnel can also have difference.
That is, in related art scheme, there are accuracy because of artificial marking for the evaluation for electronic health record The problem of not high, and it is not suitable for _ based Patient Records Management Systems.
The content of the invention
Based on this, in the present invention, spy proposes a kind of evaluation method of electronic health record, can be to the fortune of electronic health record state Row case history is evaluated, also, improves the accuracy of the evaluation for case history.
A kind of evaluation method of electronic health record, including:
The electronic health record of selection is obtained as target case history, obtains at least one attribute item of the target case history, it is described Each attribute item includes the property value corresponding with the attribute item;
On default case history displaying interface at least one attribute item for getting described in displaying and with the attribute item pair The property value evaluation component answered, the property value evaluation component include at least one evaluation label;
It is corresponding with the attribute item to determine that user is used as by the evaluation label that the property value evaluation component of the displaying selects Objective appraisal label, the quantity of the objective appraisal label is at least one;According to it is default evaluation label with evaluation score value it Between correspondence and definite objective appraisal label, determine that corresponding with attribute item attribute item evaluates score value;
According to default case history evaluation algorithms and attribute item corresponding with least one attribute item evaluation score value, calculate with The corresponding overall merit score value of the target case history, and show the overall merit score value on the default case history displaying interface.
Optionally, in one of the embodiments, after at least one attribute item for obtaining the target case history also Including:
At least one attribute item is traveled through, for the attribute item traversed, is obtained default corresponding with the attribute item Property value fills in rule, and rule and property value corresponding with the attribute item are filled according to the property value got, calculates and is somebody's turn to do The corresponding attribute item evaluation score value of attribute item;
Described evaluate according to default case history evaluation algorithms and attribute item corresponding with least one attribute item is performed to divide Value calculates overall merit score value corresponding with the target case history.
Optionally, in one of the embodiments, it is described to show what is got on interface described in displaying in default case history Further included before at least one attribute item and property value evaluation component corresponding with the attribute item:
For each attribute item, list of labels corresponding with the attribute item is determined, the list of labels includes default At least one evaluation label;
At least one attribute item got on default case history displaying interface described in displaying and corresponding category Property value evaluation component further includes:
Property value evaluation component corresponding with the attribute item is generated according to the definite list of labels, the property value is commented Valency component includes default at least one evaluation label;
The attribute item and corresponding property value evaluation component are shown on the default case history displaying interface.
Optionally, in one of the embodiments, it is described according to default case history evaluation algorithms and with least one category Property item corresponding attribute item evaluation score value calculate overall merit score value corresponding with the target case history and further include:
Default weight coefficient corresponding with each attribute item is obtained as target weight coefficient;
According to the attribute item evaluation score value corresponding with least one attribute item and the target weight coefficient, calculate Overall merit score value corresponding with the target case history.
Optionally, in one of the embodiments, it is described according to default case history evaluation algorithms and with least one category Property item corresponding attribute item evaluation score value calculate overall merit score value corresponding with the target case history and further include afterwards:
Judge whether the overall merit score value is less than default score threshold, be less than in the overall merit score value described default Score threshold in the case of, obtain the definite objective appraisal label;
The target case history is marked according to the objective appraisal label of the acquisition, and the target case history is marked For problem case history.
In addition, in the present embodiment, it is also proposed that a kind of evaluating apparatus of electronic health record.
A kind of evaluating apparatus of electronic health record, including:
Case history determining module, the electronic health record for obtaining selection obtain the target case history extremely as target case history A few attribute item, each described attribute item include the property value corresponding with the attribute item;
Case history display module, at least one attribute item got described in the displaying on default case history displaying interface And property value evaluation component corresponding with the attribute item, the property value evaluation component include at least one evaluation label;
Attribute item evaluates score value determining module, the property value evaluation component selection for passing through the displaying for determining user Evaluation label is at least one as objective appraisal label corresponding with the attribute item, the quantity of the objective appraisal label;According to Correspondence and definite objective appraisal label between default evaluation label and evaluation score value, determine and the attribute item pair The attribute item evaluation score value answered;
Overall merit score value computing module, for according to default case history evaluation algorithms and corresponding with least one attribute item Attribute item evaluation score value, calculate corresponding with target case history overall merit score value, and boundary is shown in the default case history The overall merit score value is shown on face.
Optionally, in one of the embodiments, the attribute item evaluation score value determining module is additionally operable to described in traversal extremely A few attribute item, for the attribute item traversed, obtains default property value corresponding with the attribute item and fills in rule, according to The property value got fills in rule and property value corresponding with the attribute item, calculates attribute item corresponding with the attribute item and comments Valency score value;Call the overall merit score value computing module.
Optionally, in one of the embodiments, described device further includes property value evaluation component generation module, for pair In each attribute item, list of labels corresponding with the attribute item is determined, the list of labels at least one is commented including default Price card label;
The case history display module is additionally operable to generate attribute corresponding with the attribute item according to the definite list of labels It is worth evaluation component, the property value evaluation component includes default at least one evaluation label;In the default case history Displaying shows the attribute item and corresponding property value evaluation component on interface.
Optionally, in one of the embodiments, the overall merit score value computing module be additionally operable to obtain it is default with it is every The corresponding weight coefficient of one attribute item is as target weight coefficient;According to the attribute item corresponding with least one attribute item Score value and the target weight coefficient are evaluated, calculates overall merit score value corresponding with the target case history.
Optionally, in one of the embodiments, described device further includes problem case history mark module, described for judging Whether overall merit score value is less than default score threshold, is less than the situation of the default score threshold in the overall merit score value Under, obtain the definite objective appraisal label;According to the objective appraisal label of the acquisition to the target case history into rower Note, and the target case history is labeled as problem case history.
Implement the embodiment of the present invention, will have the advantages that:
After the evaluation method and device for employing above-mentioned electronic health record, for running electronic health record, user can be with Interface is shown by corresponding case, whether the filling in for the corresponding property value of each attribute item of the electronic health record of displaying is expired Sufficient rule is checked, also, is selected by displaying property value evaluation component corresponding with the attribute item for the attribute The corresponding evaluation label of property value of item, each of which evaluates label all there are a default corresponding scoring, according to this Scoring can determine that the corresponding scoring of attribute item that each have rated;Finally, evaluated and calculated by default electronic health record Method and the corresponding scoring of each attribute item, calculate the overall score of the electronic health record of displaying and are shown, and are overall merit Score value.That is, after employing the evaluation method and device of the electronic health record in the present invention, can be by each category Property item realize the automatic Evaluation to electronic health record into the method for row label, improve the accuracy of electronic health record evaluation and credible Degree.
Further, as long as the electronic health record that can be checked can evaluate it, this is allowed in disease Each stage that people is in hospital, corresponding Quality Control personnel etc. can be to running electronic health record or the ends eventually filed Case is evaluated, and improves the scope of application of the evaluation method of electronic health record.
Brief description of the drawings
In order to illustrate more clearly about the embodiment of the present invention or technical scheme of the prior art, below will be to embodiment or existing There is attached drawing needed in technology description to be briefly described, it should be apparent that, drawings in the following description are only this Some embodiments of invention, for those of ordinary skill in the art, without creative efforts, can be with Other attached drawings are obtained according to these attached drawings.
Wherein:
Fig. 1 is a kind of flow diagram of the evaluation method of electronic health record in one embodiment;
Fig. 2 is the schematic diagram of the displayed page of electronic health record in one embodiment;
Fig. 3 is the schematic diagram of the displayed page of electronic health record in one embodiment;
Fig. 4 is a kind of structure diagram of the evaluating apparatus of electronic health record in one embodiment;
Fig. 5 is the structure diagram of the computer equipment for the evaluation method that aforementioned electronic case history is run in one embodiment.
Embodiment
Below in conjunction with the attached drawing in the embodiment of the present invention, the technical solution in the embodiment of the present invention is carried out clear, complete Site preparation describes, it is clear that described embodiment is only part of the embodiment of the present invention, instead of all the embodiments.It is based on Embodiment in the present invention, those of ordinary skill in the art are obtained every other without creative efforts Embodiment, belongs to the scope of protection of the invention.
In the present embodiment, it is proposed that a kind of evaluation method of electronic health record, the realization of this method can be dependent on computer Program, the computer program can run on the computer system based on von Neumann system, which can be The application program evaluated electronic health record based on _ based Patient Records Management Systems or electronic health record evaluation system.The computer System can run the terminal device such as smart mobile phone, tablet computer, PC of above computer program.
It should be noted that in the present embodiment, the electronic health record in the evaluation method of above-mentioned electronic health record is in patient The case history that doctor or other medical staff fill in corresponding system during curing the disease or being in hospital, for example, in patient admission Establish corresponding with patient electronic health record, also, within the hospital stays of the patient, doctor can at any time according to medication, Operation, the concrete condition checked further fill in case history.That is, any stage during patient is in hospital, can be with Electronic health record is evaluated, also, in the case where electronic health record has been filed, can also through this embodiment in provide The evaluation method of electronic health record evaluates the electronic health record that this has been filed.
Specifically, as shown in Figure 1, the evaluation method of above-mentioned electronic health record includes the following steps S102-S108:
Step S102:The electronic health record of selection is obtained as target case history.
In the present embodiment, the definite of target case history can be that system makes choice at random, that is to say, that system is random Random screening is carried out to all electronic health records, determines that one or more electronic health record is checked.Alternatively, in another implementation Example in, user can also to the random selection of target case history carry out condition setting, for example, select some section office case history or Person selects the case history of some doctor or selects the case history of some time phase or select the disease of some period Go through or select the case history in some stage;Can certainly be all diseases under some or multiple alternative conditions Go through and checked.Alternatively, in another embodiment, user can also selection needs what is checked in case history list manually Electronic health record is as target case history.Or in one embodiment, can also be to all electronic health records in list by It is a to be checked.
Step S104:At least one attribute item of the target case history is obtained, each described attribute item includes and the category The property corresponding property value of item.
User can be filled in, for example, general electronics when filling in electronic health record according to multiple lists of electronic health record Case history includes at least essential information, allergies, the patient masters such as patient name and states the state of an illness, physical examination, progress note, doctor's advice, use Multiple form items such as medicine record, user can fill in corresponding list content according to the label of form item, so as to complete electronic health record Fill in.
In the present embodiment, the form item that user fills in during electronic health record is filled in is target case history One attribute item, the list content that user fills in during electronic health record is filled in are the corresponding property value of the attribute item. For example, in the application scenarios shown in Fig. 2, Fig. 2 illustrates the example of an electronic health record, numbering L1 (L11, L12, L13) institute Show an attribute item as an electronic health record, be the attribute item correspondence shown in L1 shown in numbering L2 (L21, L22, L23) Property value.
In general, more than one of the form item filled in is needed in the electronic health record that doctor or other medical staff fill in, That is, the electronic health record that the list content filled according to doctor and other medical staff generates includes more than one attribute , also, each attribute item further comprises corresponding property value (it should be noted that property value can be 0 or empty).
Step S106:On default case history displaying interface at least one attribute item for getting described in displaying and with this The corresponding property value evaluation component of attribute item, the property value evaluation component include at least one evaluation label.
When user evaluates running electronic health record or the electronic health record filed, it is necessary to corresponding In _ based Patient Records Management Systems or electronic health record evaluation system corresponding electronics is checked in corresponding electronic health record displayed page Case history, that is to say, that user can check the electronic health record that needs are evaluated in case history shows interface.
In the present embodiment, at least one category got in step S104 is illustrated in default case history shows interface Property item, it is necessary to explanation, show target case history all attribute items when, the information of displaying includes and the attribute item pair The attribute item label (for example, in Fig. 2 shown in numbering L3) answered, and property value corresponding with the attribute item.
Further, the operation for relevant case history inspection personnel or case history evaluation personnel when carrying out case history evaluation It is convenient, when showing each attribute item of target case history, also illustrate property value evaluation component corresponding with the attribute item, example Such as, by the attribute item label of the attribute item of displaying or displayed page is corresponding with the display area of the attribute item default Property value evaluation component display area, illustrates the property value evaluation component that user can be inputted.
It should be noted that in the present embodiment, contained in property value evaluation component can selected evaluation label, And it is possible to the evaluation label of selection can be with more than one.
In application scenarios as shown in Figure 3, shown in numbering L4 is property value evaluation component, and user can be by this Property value evaluation component inputs the corresponding evaluation of the corresponding property value of the attribute item.In a specific embodiment, such as Fig. 3 institutes Show, property value evaluation component is to contain the drop-down choice box of multiple evaluation labels, and user can be selected by the drop-down choice box Select the evaluation label for needing to input.
Step S108:Determine that user is used as and the category by the evaluation label that the property value evaluation component of the displaying selects The property corresponding objective appraisal label of item, the quantity of the objective appraisal label are at least one.
As it was previously stated, user can be selected corresponding for current attribute item by the property value evaluation component of displaying The corresponding default evaluation label of property value evaluation, for example, for " allergies " item, evaluation label can be " drug allergy Do not fill in " or " allergies are filled in lack of standardization " etc..
It should be noted that in the present embodiment, for some attribute item, the evaluation label more than one that can be inputted It is a, it can be specifically determined according to system setting, that is to say, that the evaluation that can be inputted can be set in systems in advance The quantity of label at most one, can also set the quantity for the evaluation label that can be inputted can be more than one.
Because different attribute items problem that may be present of filling in also can be different, for example, " allergies " item and " patient master Tell medical history " item institute there may be the problem of it is different, therefore, if using identical evaluation label for all attribute items, Then can exist evaluation label precision it is not high the problem of.Therefore, different evaluation labels is set for different attribute items, from And improve the accuracy of electronic health record evaluation.
Specifically, the attribute item shown for needs, determines list of labels corresponding with the attribute item, the list of labels Including default at least one evaluation label.That is, in default attribute item with the correspondence of evaluation label, determining Evaluation label corresponding with current attribute item or evaluation list of labels.Also, for an attribute item, its is corresponding The quantity of pre-set evaluation label can be with more than one.Then, definite evaluation list of labels or evaluation label are made a thorough investigation of Corresponding with the corresponding attribute item property value evaluation component of generation, the property value evaluation component of the generation are corresponding with the attribute item , also, contain above-mentioned definite multiple evaluation labels or contain what is included in above-mentioned definite evaluation list of labels All evaluation labels.Then, when showing at least one attribute item of target case history and target case history, the property value of displaying Evaluation component is the property value evaluation component of above-mentioned generation.
For example, in the application scenarios shown in Fig. 3, user can be opened up by clicking on the drop-down choice box shown in numbering L5 Show all evaluation labels that can be selected, then selection needs the evaluation label inputted from the evaluation label of displaying, as The corresponding objective appraisal label of current attribute item.
It should be noted that in the present embodiment, for some attribute item, its corresponding objective appraisal label can Think sky.That is, user can in the case where not selecting corresponding objective appraisal label to part attribute item, Submit the evaluation to current target case history.
Step S110:According to default evaluation label and evaluate the correspondence between score value and definite objective appraisal Label, determines attribute item evaluation score value corresponding with the attribute item.
For different evaluation labels, the case history corresponding to it fills in situation and level is also different, for example, " patient master Tell medical history " in item, corresponding to evaluation label " no complaints medical history " and " main suit describes unclear " the problem of, is different, sick in electron During filling in of going through is evaluated or scored, the contribution of its final appraisal results to electronic evaluating also can be different. Therefore, the corresponding evaluation score value of different evaluation labels also differs.
In the present embodiment, pre-set each evaluation label and evaluate the correspondence between score value, for example, " medicine Thing allergy is not filled in " corresponding evaluation score value be " -2 points ", " no admission records " corresponding score value of evaluating is " -25 points ".In mesh Mark evaluation label determine in the case of, according to it is above-mentioned it is default evaluation label and evaluation score value between correspondence can determine with The corresponding evaluation score value of each objective appraisal label.
Then all objective appraisal labels according to corresponding to attribute item and corresponding with each objective appraisal label Evaluation score value, determine that corresponding with attribute item attribute item evaluates score value.For example, to specified attribute item, by the attribute item The corresponding sum for evaluating score value of corresponding all objective appraisal labels, is the attribute item evaluation score value of the attribute item.
Step S112:According to default case history evaluation algorithms and attribute item corresponding with least one attribute item evaluation point Value, calculates overall merit score value corresponding with the target case history.
In the present embodiment, the computational methods of the overall merit score value of electronic health record are pre-set, for example, every by calculating The attribute item evaluation score value and overall merit score value as corresponding electronic health record of one attribute item, alternatively, by default Overall merit score value calculation formula, evaluates score value as independent variable using the attribute item of each attribute item, calculates corresponding electronics disease The overall merit score value gone through.
In the present embodiment, in the case where target case history determines, according to the attribute of each attribute item of target case history Value and corresponding attribute item evaluation score value, and default case history evaluation algorithms, you can calculate corresponding with current target case history Overall merit score value.
For example, in a specific embodiment, target case history D-Target contains N number of attribute item A1,A2,…,AN, Its corresponding property value is a1,a2,…,aN, with attribute item AiCorresponding attribute item evaluation score value is xi, calculate and target case history D- The overall merit score value S of TargettargetIt can be calculated by equation below (1), (2) or (3):
Wherein, αiXX is and AiCorresponding weight coefficient, K are a constant more than 0 and less than 100.
Further, it is above-mentioned to be commented according to default case history evaluation algorithms and attribute item corresponding with least one attribute item Valency score value calculates overall merit score value corresponding with the target case history:Obtain default corresponding with each attribute item Weight coefficient is as target weight coefficient;According to corresponding with least one attribute item attribute item evaluation score value and described Target weight coefficient, calculates overall merit score value corresponding with the target case history.
That is the corresponding weight coefficient of each attribute item is different, and different attribute items is for overall merit score value Contribution is different, for example, " progress note " corresponding weight coefficient is more than " doctor's advice " corresponding weight coefficient.In this implementation In example, the corresponding weight coefficient of each attribute item is pre-set, in this step, is calculating the overall merit point of target case history It is that mesh is calculated according to the corresponding weight coefficient of each attribute item and the corresponding attribute item evaluation score value of the attribute item during value Mark the overall merit score value of case history.
It should be noted that the computational methods of the overall merit score value of target case history be not limited to it is above-mentioned.
Step S114:The overall merit score value is shown on the default case history displaying interface.
In the present embodiment, after the evaluation that user have submitted for target case history, you can according to the selection meter of user Corresponding overall merit score value is calculated, also, corresponding overall merit score value is shown on the displaying interface of current target case history.Into one Step, in corresponding case history list, it can also show and carry out the overall merit score value of electronic health record evaluated with each.
Further, in the present embodiment, after evaluating each electronic health record, not only need corresponding The overall merit score value of the corresponding electronic health record of page presentation, when overall merit score value is too low, it is also necessary to reminded.
Specifically, above-mentioned evaluate according to default case history evaluation algorithms and attribute item corresponding with least one attribute item Score value further includes after calculating overall merit score value corresponding with the target case history:It is pre- to judge whether the overall merit score value is less than If score threshold, in the case where the overall merit score value is less than the default score threshold, obtain the definite mesh Mark evaluation label;The target case history is marked according to the objective appraisal label of the acquisition, and by the target case history Labeled as problem case history.
Overall merit score value it is too low illustrate the electronic health record fill in situation there are it is larger the problem of, it should be modified or Remind corresponding section office punished or the case history in the later stage fill in corrected.Therefore, in the present embodiment, in mesh After the overall merit score value of mark case history determines, it is also necessary to which whether the overall merit score value for judging to be calculated meets default score value bar Part, such as, if it is less than default point more than or equal to default score threshold, also, in the overall merit score value of target case history In the case of number threshold value, it is problem case history to determine the target case history, and target case history is labeled as problem case history.
Further, in order to facilitate user to problem case history there are the problem of check, or statistics it is all the problem of Related defects present in case history, in the present embodiment, the electronics except overall merit score value to be unsatisfactory for default score value condition Case history is labeled as after problem case history, and the attribute item label of the corresponding attribute item of attribute item evaluation score value is still labeled as problem The label of case history.Further, because evaluation label is that the problems of some attribute item of target case history is commented The label of valency, that is to say, that objective appraisal label may indicate that the target case history there are the problem of, therefore, in the present embodiment, All objective appraisal labels for also needing to determine during evaluating target case history are also added to problem case history In label.
It should be noted that in the present embodiment, whether each attribute item to electronic health record that user can be manually Checked there are certain defect and label, still, the evaluation for electronic health record is not limited to the manual label of user, can be with Automatic Evaluation including computer.
For example, for the attribute item (required item) having to fill out in electronic health record, if associated care personnel are filling in During do not fill in, i.e., in the case that the property value of required item is blank, electronic health record relational system or electronic health record Whether evaluation system is automatically that sky is detected to the property value of required item, and evaluates commenting for score value according to default required item Valency rule, provides corresponding attribute item evaluation score value.
Can whether be automatically not only that sky is detected to property value in another specific embodiment, can be with Whether the property value of detection attribute item meets default condition, for example, " date of birth " whether within the scope of specifying, then example Such as, whether " dispensing information " contains defined normative content, for another example during operation whether the fill in the time of " operation record " Between complete after 2 hours within etc..
Specifically, in one embodiment, after the step of obtaining at least one attribute item of the target case history, also Including:At least one attribute item is traveled through, for the attribute item traversed, obtains default attribute corresponding with the attribute item Value fills in rule, fills in rule and property value corresponding with the attribute item according to the property value got, calculates and the attribute The corresponding attribute item evaluation score value of item;According to default case history evaluation algorithms and attribute item corresponding with least one attribute item Evaluate score value and calculate overall merit score value corresponding with the target case history.
That is, for each attribute item, determine that property value corresponding with the attribute item fills in rule, and according to this Property value fills in rule and the property value of the attribute item is evaluated, and calculates corresponding attribute item evaluation score value, which can For the calculating of final overall merit score value.
In addition, to solve being put down in user and other users by instant messaging application or social networks in conventional art Platform chatted during there are user is reminded during risk effective percentage deficiency technical problem, one implementation In example, as shown in Figure 4, it is also proposed that a kind of evaluating apparatus of electronic health record, including:
Case history determining module 102, the electronic health record for obtaining selection obtain the target case history as target case history At least one attribute item, each described attribute item include the property value corresponding with the attribute item;
Case history display module 104, at least one category got described in the displaying on default case history displaying interface Property item and property value evaluation component corresponding with the attribute item, the property value evaluation component includes at least one evaluation and marks Label;
Attribute item evaluation score value determining module 106, for determining that user is selected by the property value evaluation component of the displaying The evaluation label selected is at least one as objective appraisal label corresponding with the attribute item, the quantity of the objective appraisal label; According to default evaluation label and the correspondence between score value and definite objective appraisal label are evaluated, is determined and the attribute The corresponding attribute item evaluation score value of item;
Overall merit score value computing module 108, for according to default case history evaluation algorithms and with least one attribute item Corresponding attribute item evaluates score value, calculates overall merit score value corresponding with the target case history, and in the default case history exhibition Show and the overall merit score value is shown on interface.
Optionally, in one embodiment, attribute item evaluation score value determining module 106 is additionally operable to travel through described at least one Attribute item, for the attribute item traversed, obtains default property value corresponding with the attribute item and fills in rule, according to getting Property value fill in rule and property value corresponding with the attribute item, calculate attribute item evaluation corresponding with the attribute item and divide Value;Call the overall merit score value computing module 108.
Optionally, in one embodiment, as shown in figure 4, above device further includes property value evaluation component generation module 110, for for each attribute item, determining list of labels corresponding with the attribute item, the list of labels includes default At least one evaluation label;
The case history display module 104 is additionally operable to generate category corresponding with the attribute item according to the definite list of labels Property value evaluation component, the property value evaluation component include default at least one evaluation label;In the default disease Go through on displaying interface and show the attribute item and corresponding property value evaluation component.
Optionally, in one embodiment, overall merit score value computing module 108 is additionally operable to obtain default and each category The property corresponding weight coefficient of item is as target weight coefficient;According to the attribute item evaluation point corresponding with least one attribute item Value and the target weight coefficient, calculate overall merit score value corresponding with the target case history.
Optionally, in one embodiment, as shown in figure 4, above device further includes problem case history mark module 112, use In judging whether the overall merit score value is less than default score threshold, it is less than the default fraction in the overall merit score value In the case of threshold value, the definite objective appraisal label is obtained;According to the objective appraisal label of the acquisition to the target Case history is marked, and the target case history is labeled as problem case history.
Implement the embodiment of the present invention, will have the advantages that:
After the evaluation method and device for employing above-mentioned electronic health record, for running electronic health record, user can be with Interface is shown by corresponding case, whether the filling in for the corresponding property value of each attribute item of the electronic health record of displaying is expired Sufficient rule is checked, also, is selected by displaying property value evaluation component corresponding with the attribute item for the attribute The corresponding evaluation label of property value of item, each of which evaluates label all there are a default corresponding scoring, according to this Scoring can determine that the corresponding scoring of attribute item that each have rated;Finally, evaluated and calculated by default electronic health record Method and the corresponding scoring of each attribute item, calculate the overall score of the electronic health record of displaying and are shown, and are overall merit Score value.That is, after employing the evaluation method and device of the electronic health record in the present invention, can be by each category Property item realize the automatic Evaluation to electronic health record into the method for row label, improve the accuracy of electronic health record evaluation and credible Degree.
Further, as long as the electronic health record that can be checked can evaluate it, this is allowed in disease Each stage that people is in hospital, corresponding Quality Control personnel etc. can be to running electronic health record or the ends eventually filed Case is evaluated, and improves the scope of application of the evaluation method of electronic health record.
In the above-described embodiments, can it is all or part of by software, hardware, firmware or its any combination come reality It is existing.When being realized using software program, can realize in the form of a computer program product whole or in part.The computer Program product includes one or more computer instructions.When loading on computers and performing the computer program instructions, entirely Portion is partly produced according to the flow or function described in the embodiment of the present invention.The computer can be all-purpose computer, specially With computer, computer network or other programmable devices.The computer instruction can be stored in computer-readable storage In medium, or the transmission from a computer-readable recording medium to another computer-readable recording medium, for example, the meter The instruction of calculation machine can pass through wired (such as coaxial cable, light from a web-site, computer, server or data center Fine, Digital Subscriber Line (DSL)) or wireless (such as infrared, wireless, microwave etc.) mode to another web-site, computer, clothes Business device or data center are transmitted.It is any available can be that computer can access for the computer-readable recording medium The data storage device such as medium or the server integrated comprising one or more usable mediums, data center.It is described to use Medium can be magnetic medium, (for example, floppy disk, hard disk, tape), optical medium (for example, DVD) or semiconductor medium (such as it is solid State hard disk Solid State Disk (SSD)) etc..
In one embodiment, as shown in figure 5, Fig. 5 illustrates a kind of base for the evaluation method for running above-mentioned electronic health record In the terminal of the computer system of von Neumann system.The computer system can be smart mobile phone, tablet computer, palm electricity The terminal devices such as brain, laptop or PC.Specifically, it may include the outer input interface connected by system bus 1001st, processor 1002, memory 1003 and output interface 1004.Wherein, outer input interface 1001 optionally can be wrapped at least Include network interface 10012.Memory 1003 may include external memory 10032 (such as hard disk, CD or floppy disk etc.) and memory storage Device 10034.Output interface 1004 can include at least the equipment such as display screen 10042.
In the present embodiment, the operation of this method is based on computer program, and the program file of the computer program is stored in In the external memory 10032 of the foregoing computer system based on von Neumann system, built-in storage is operationally loaded into In 10034, then it is compiled as being transferred in processor 1002 after machine code performing, so that being based on von Neumann system Computer system in form modules in logic.And in the evaluation method implementation procedure of above-mentioned electronic health record, input Parameter received by outer input interface 1001, and be transferred in memory 1003 and cache, be then input to processor Handled in 1002, the result data of processing or be cached in memory 1003 is subsequently handled, or is passed to defeated Outgoing interface 1004 is exported.
The above disclosure is only the preferred embodiments of the present invention, cannot limit the right model of the present invention with this certainly Enclose, therefore equivalent variations made according to the claims of the present invention, it is still within the scope of the present invention.

Claims (10)

  1. A kind of 1. evaluation method of electronic health record, it is characterised in that including:
    The electronic health record of selection is obtained as target case history, obtains at least one attribute item of the target case history, it is described each A attribute item includes the property value corresponding with the attribute item;
    At least one attribute item for getting described in displaying and corresponding with the attribute item on default case history displaying interface Property value evaluation component, the property value evaluation component include at least one evaluation label;
    Determine that user is used as mesh corresponding with the attribute item by the evaluation label that the property value evaluation component of the displaying selects Mark evaluation label, the quantity of the objective appraisal label are at least one;According between default evaluation label and evaluation score value Correspondence and definite objective appraisal label, determine attribute item evaluation score value corresponding with the attribute item;
    According to default case history evaluation algorithms and attribute item corresponding with least one attribute item evaluation score value, calculate with it is described The corresponding overall merit score value of target case history, and show the overall merit score value on the default case history displaying interface.
  2. 2. the evaluation method of electronic health record according to claim 1, it is characterised in that the acquisition target case history Further included after at least one attribute item:
    At least one attribute item is traveled through, for the attribute item traversed, obtains default attribute corresponding with the attribute item Value fills in rule, fills in rule and property value corresponding with the attribute item according to the property value got, calculates and the attribute The corresponding attribute item evaluation score value of item;
    Perform and described score value meter is evaluated according to default case history evaluation algorithms and attribute item corresponding with least one attribute item Calculate overall merit score value corresponding with the target case history.
  3. 3. the evaluation method of electronic health record according to claim 1, it is characterised in that described to show boundary in default case history Also wrapped before at least one attribute item and property value evaluation component corresponding with the attribute item that are got on face described in displaying Include:
    For each attribute item, determine list of labels corresponding with the attribute item, the list of labels including it is default at least One evaluation label;
    At least one attribute item got on default case history displaying interface described in displaying and corresponding property value Evaluation component further includes:
    Property value evaluation component corresponding with the attribute item, the property value evaluation group are generated according to the definite list of labels Part includes default at least one evaluation label;
    The attribute item and corresponding property value evaluation component are shown on the default case history displaying interface.
  4. 4. the evaluation method of electronic health record according to claim 1, it is characterised in that described to be evaluated according to default case history Algorithm and attribute item corresponding with least one attribute item evaluation score value calculate overall merit point corresponding with the target case history Value further includes:
    Default weight coefficient corresponding with each attribute item is obtained as target weight coefficient;
    According to the attribute item evaluation score value corresponding with least one attribute item and the target weight coefficient, calculating and institute State the corresponding overall merit score value of target case history.
  5. 5. the evaluation method of electronic health record according to claim 1, it is characterised in that described to be evaluated according to default case history Algorithm and attribute item corresponding with least one attribute item evaluation score value calculate overall merit point corresponding with the target case history Further included after value:
    Judge whether the overall merit score value is less than default score threshold, be less than described default point in the overall merit score value In the case of number threshold value, the definite objective appraisal label is obtained;
    The target case history is marked according to the objective appraisal label of the acquisition, and the target case history is labeled as asking Inscribe case history.
  6. A kind of 6. evaluating apparatus of electronic health record, it is characterised in that including:
    Case history determining module, the electronic health record for obtaining selection obtain at least the one of the target case history as target case history A attribute item, each described attribute item include the property value corresponding with the attribute item;
    Case history display module, at least one attribute item for getting described in displaying on default case history displaying interface and Property value evaluation component corresponding with the attribute item, the property value evaluation component include at least one evaluation label;
    Attribute item evaluates score value determining module, the evaluation selected for determining user by the property value evaluation component of the displaying Label is at least one as objective appraisal label corresponding with the attribute item, the quantity of the objective appraisal label;According to default Evaluation label and evaluate score value between correspondence and definite objective appraisal label, determine it is corresponding with the attribute item Attribute item evaluates score value;
    Overall merit score value computing module, for according to default case history evaluation algorithms and category corresponding with least one attribute item Property item evaluation score value, calculate corresponding with target case history overall merit score value, and show on interface in the default case history Show the overall merit score value.
  7. 7. the evaluating apparatus of electronic health record according to claim 6, it is characterised in that the attribute item evaluation score value determines Module is additionally operable to travel through at least one attribute item, for the attribute item traversed, obtains default corresponding with the attribute item Property value fill in rule, rule and property value corresponding with the attribute item are filled according to the property value got, calculate with The corresponding attribute item evaluation score value of the attribute item;Call the overall merit score value computing module.
  8. 8. the evaluating apparatus of electronic health record according to claim 6, it is characterised in that described device further includes property value and comments Valency component generation module, for for each attribute item, determining list of labels corresponding with the attribute item, the list of labels Including default at least one evaluation label;
    The case history display module is additionally operable to be commented according to the definite list of labels generation property value corresponding with the attribute item Valency component, the property value evaluation component include default at least one evaluation label;Shown in the default case history The attribute item and corresponding property value evaluation component are shown on interface.
  9. 9. the evaluating apparatus of electronic health record according to claim 6, it is characterised in that the overall merit score value computing module It is additionally operable to obtain default weight coefficient corresponding with each attribute item as target weight coefficient;According to described with least one A corresponding attribute item evaluation score value of attribute item and the target weight coefficient, calculate general comment corresponding with the target case history Valency score value.
  10. 10. the evaluating apparatus of electronic health record according to claim 6, it is characterised in that described device further includes problem disease Mark module is gone through, for judging whether the overall merit score value is less than default score threshold, is less than in the overall merit score value In the case of the default score threshold, the definite objective appraisal label is obtained;According to the objective appraisal of the acquisition The target case history is marked in label, and the target case history is labeled as problem case history.
CN201711064093.4A 2017-11-02 2017-11-02 The evaluation method and device of electronic health record Pending CN107945840A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201711064093.4A CN107945840A (en) 2017-11-02 2017-11-02 The evaluation method and device of electronic health record

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201711064093.4A CN107945840A (en) 2017-11-02 2017-11-02 The evaluation method and device of electronic health record

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN107945840A true CN107945840A (en) 2018-04-20

Family

ID=61934169

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201711064093.4A Pending CN107945840A (en) 2017-11-02 2017-11-02 The evaluation method and device of electronic health record

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN107945840A (en)

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN109637642A (en) * 2018-12-04 2019-04-16 平安医疗健康管理股份有限公司 Medical institutions' dialysis horizontal wire examination method, device, equipment and storage medium
CN110718279A (en) * 2019-09-20 2020-01-21 陈卫霞 Report quality evaluation system and method based on structured label classification
CN110751995A (en) * 2019-08-28 2020-02-04 云知声智能科技股份有限公司 Electronic medical record defect labeling and scoring method
CN111755090A (en) * 2020-06-24 2020-10-09 南京江北新区生物医药公共服务平台有限公司 Medical record searching method, medical record searching device, storage medium and electronic equipment

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN101582100A (en) * 2008-05-17 2009-11-18 侯红卫 Terminal medical record quality evaluation input system and input method thereof
CN101714191A (en) * 2009-11-13 2010-05-26 无锡曼荼罗软件有限公司 Quality control method and device for electronic medical records
CN105808951A (en) * 2016-03-10 2016-07-27 宁波金唐软件有限公司 Quality control method and apparatus for electronic medical record
CN106682397A (en) * 2016-12-09 2017-05-17 江西中科九峰智慧医疗科技有限公司 Knowledge-based electronic medical record quality control method

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN101582100A (en) * 2008-05-17 2009-11-18 侯红卫 Terminal medical record quality evaluation input system and input method thereof
CN101714191A (en) * 2009-11-13 2010-05-26 无锡曼荼罗软件有限公司 Quality control method and device for electronic medical records
CN105808951A (en) * 2016-03-10 2016-07-27 宁波金唐软件有限公司 Quality control method and apparatus for electronic medical record
CN106682397A (en) * 2016-12-09 2017-05-17 江西中科九峰智慧医疗科技有限公司 Knowledge-based electronic medical record quality control method

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN109637642A (en) * 2018-12-04 2019-04-16 平安医疗健康管理股份有限公司 Medical institutions' dialysis horizontal wire examination method, device, equipment and storage medium
WO2020113959A1 (en) * 2018-12-04 2020-06-11 平安医疗健康管理股份有限公司 Medical institution dialysis level assessment method, apparatus and device, and storage medium
CN109637642B (en) * 2018-12-04 2022-08-19 深圳平安医疗健康科技服务有限公司 Assessment method, device, equipment and storage medium for dialysis level of medical institution
CN110751995A (en) * 2019-08-28 2020-02-04 云知声智能科技股份有限公司 Electronic medical record defect labeling and scoring method
CN110751995B (en) * 2019-08-28 2022-04-12 云知声智能科技股份有限公司 Electronic medical record defect labeling and scoring method
CN110718279A (en) * 2019-09-20 2020-01-21 陈卫霞 Report quality evaluation system and method based on structured label classification
CN111755090A (en) * 2020-06-24 2020-10-09 南京江北新区生物医药公共服务平台有限公司 Medical record searching method, medical record searching device, storage medium and electronic equipment

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Baek et al. Validity of the Morse Fall Scale implemented in an electronic medical record system
JP5695661B2 (en) System that generates a graphic display
Mira et al. The second victim phenomenon after a clinical error: the design and evaluation of a website to reduce caregivers’ emotional responses after a clinical error
Kern et al. Accuracy of electronically reported “meaningful use” clinical quality measures: a cross-sectional study
Carrier et al. Physicians’ fears of malpractice lawsuits are not assuaged by tort reforms
Kern et al. The patient-centered medical home, electronic health records, and quality of care
Pickering et al. Data utilization for medical decision making at the time of patient admission to ICU
Payne et al. Racial disparities in ordering laboratory and radiology tests for pediatric patients in the emergency department
US10103947B2 (en) Processing of portable device data
CN107945840A (en) The evaluation method and device of electronic health record
CN105981070A (en) Presentation of physiological data
WO2014117149A1 (en) Managing the care of a client in a care management system
AU2017206112B2 (en) Processing of portable device data
WO2019070200A1 (en) A healthcare information management system
Helgason et al. Beating the odds with systematic individualized care: nationwide prospective follow‐up of all patients with COVID‐19 in Iceland
CN107978343A (en) The evaluation system of electronic health record
US11551815B2 (en) Risk monitoring scores
Schluter et al. Association between community water fluoridation and severe dental caries experience in 4-year-old New Zealand children
Kerns et al. Estimating the impact of deploying an electronic clinical decision support tool as part of a national practice improvement project
Singh-Franco et al. Impact of pharmacy-supported interventions on proportion of patients receiving non-indicated acid suppressive therapy upon discharge: a systematic review and meta-analysis
WO2019084864A1 (en) Method and apparatus for evaluating electronic medical record
Ogle et al. Medication management and e-care planning: What are the opportunities for the future?
JP5203481B2 (en) Disease management system
Facchiano et al. Evidence-based practice for the busy nurse practitioner: Part four: Putting it all together
Prell et al. Identifying patterns of self-reported nonadherence using network analysis in a mixed German cohort

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
RJ01 Rejection of invention patent application after publication

Application publication date: 20180420

RJ01 Rejection of invention patent application after publication