CN107844103B - Method and device for displaying multiple errors on human-computer interface - Google Patents
Method and device for displaying multiple errors on human-computer interface Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN107844103B CN107844103B CN201710918102.5A CN201710918102A CN107844103B CN 107844103 B CN107844103 B CN 107844103B CN 201710918102 A CN201710918102 A CN 201710918102A CN 107844103 B CN107844103 B CN 107844103B
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- error
- error conditions
- conditions
- locations
- human
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 34
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 claims description 16
- 230000000977 initiatory effect Effects 0.000 claims description 6
- 239000003550 marker Substances 0.000 claims 1
- 230000003068 static effect Effects 0.000 description 12
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 9
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000011960 computer-aided design Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 239000004065 semiconductor Substances 0.000 description 4
- 230000009466 transformation Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000004590 computer program Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000000844 transformation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000003990 capacitor Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000013500 data storage Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010348 incorporation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007689 inspection Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011835 investigation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000006855 networking Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001902 propagating effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000011664 signaling Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B19/00—Programme-control systems
- G05B19/02—Programme-control systems electric
- G05B19/418—Total factory control, i.e. centrally controlling a plurality of machines, e.g. direct or distributed numerical control [DNC], flexible manufacturing systems [FMS], integrated manufacturing systems [IMS] or computer integrated manufacturing [CIM]
- G05B19/41845—Total factory control, i.e. centrally controlling a plurality of machines, e.g. direct or distributed numerical control [DNC], flexible manufacturing systems [FMS], integrated manufacturing systems [IMS] or computer integrated manufacturing [CIM] characterised by system universality, reconfigurability, modularity
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B2219/00—Program-control systems
- G05B2219/30—Nc systems
- G05B2219/32—Operator till task planning
- G05B2219/32128—Gui graphical user interface
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B2219/00—Program-control systems
- G05B2219/30—Nc systems
- G05B2219/32—Operator till task planning
- G05B2219/32214—Display on screen what fault and which tool and what order to repair fault
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02P—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
- Y02P90/00—Enabling technologies with a potential contribution to greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions mitigation
- Y02P90/02—Total factory control, e.g. smart factories, flexible manufacturing systems [FMS] or integrated manufacturing systems [IMS]
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
- User Interface Of Digital Computer (AREA)
Abstract
The invention relates to a method and a device for displaying a plurality of errors on a human-computer interface. One or more non-transitory computer-readable media having program instructions stored thereon that cause a plurality of errors to be displayed are provided. The program instructions, when executed by the computing system, direct the computing system to at least initiate display of a graphical view of the industrial automation environment. The program instructions also direct the computing system to detect a plurality of error conditions related to machine operation within the industrial automation environment and determine a plurality of locations within the graphical view associated with the plurality of error conditions. The program instructions also direct the computing system to identify at least one set of error conditions from a plurality of error conditions based on the plurality of locations and initiate display of a graphical representation of the at least one set of error conditions.
Description
The application is a divisional application of Chinese patent application with application number 201210451117.2, which is filed on 12/11/2012, and entitled "method and device for displaying multiple errors on human-computer interface".
Cross Reference to Related Applications
This application claims the benefit OF U.S. provisional patent application No.61/558,694 entitled "METHOD AND APPATUS FOR THIDSLAY OF MULTIPLE ERRORS ON A HUMAN-MACHINE INTERFACE", filed 11/2011, the entire contents OF which are incorporated herein by reference.
Background
In many industrial environments, the amount and complexity of equipment used needs to be automated in order to use the equipment productively. Automation is enhanced by a simplified interface between the user of the equipment and the equipment itself. This functionality is often provided through the use of a human-machine interface, which may be a simple computer including a touch screen or other input device to allow a user to control the equipment.
When problems occur in an industrial environment, these problems are often concentrated. Typically each error causes an error message on the human-machine interface. If a significant crash occurs, a large number of errors may be generated and all of these errors may be displayed on the human machine interface superimposed on each other. The operator must classify all of these errors to determine the often complex cause of the problem.
Disclosure of Invention
In one embodiment, one or more non-transitory computer-readable media having program instructions stored thereon that facilitate displaying a plurality of errors is provided. The program instructions, when executed by a computing system, direct the computing system to at least initiate display of a graphical view of an industrial automation environment. The program instructions further direct the computing system to detect a plurality of error conditions related to machine operation within the industrial automation environment and determine a plurality of locations within the graphical view associated with the plurality of error conditions.
The program instructions also include program instructions to direct the computing system to identify at least one set of error conditions from the plurality of error conditions based on the plurality of locations and initiate display of a graphical representation of the at least one set of error conditions.
In another embodiment, a method for displaying a plurality of errors on a human-machine interface is provided. The method includes displaying a graphical view of an industrial automation environment and detecting a plurality of error conditions associated with machine operation within the industrial automation environment.
The method also includes determining a plurality of locations within the graphical view associated with the plurality of error conditions, and identifying at least one set of error conditions from the plurality of error conditions based on the plurality of locations. The method also includes displaying a graphical representation of the at least one set of error conditions.
In another embodiment, a human-machine interface for displaying a plurality of errors within an industrial automation environment is provided. The human-machine interface comprises: a communication interface configured to receive a plurality of error conditions related to machine operation within an industrial automation environment; and a processor coupled to the communication interface.
The processor is configured to: initiating display of a graphical view of an industrial automation environment; determining a plurality of locations within the graphical view associated with a plurality of error conditions; identifying at least one set of error conditions from a plurality of error conditions based on the plurality of locations; and initiating display of a graphical representation of the at least one set of error conditions.
This summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts in a simplified form that are further described below in the technical disclosure. It should be understood that this summary is not intended to identify key features or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used to limit the scope of the claimed subject matter.
Drawings
FIG. 1 shows a flow chart of a method of displaying a plurality of errors on a human machine interface;
FIG. 2 illustrates a block diagram of a computer system configured to operate as a human-machine interface;
FIG. 3 illustrates a workflow diagram of a workflow associated with computer-aided design of a human-machine interface graphical element (element);
FIG. 4 illustrates a block diagram of a computer system configured to operate as a human-machine interface;
FIG. 5 illustrates a human machine interface screen displaying a plurality of errors;
FIG. 6 illustrates a human machine interface screen displaying a plurality of errors grouped together from FIG. 5; and
FIG. 7 illustrates a human interface screen displaying an error report for one of the errors from FIG. 6.
Detailed Description
The following description and the associated drawings teach the best mode of the invention. For the purpose of teaching inventive principles, some conventional aspects of the best mode may be simplified or omitted. The appended claims set forth the scope of the invention. Aspects of the best mode may not fall within the scope of the invention, which is defined by the claims. Therefore, those skilled in the art will recognize variations from the best mode that fall within the scope of the invention. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the features described below can be combined in various ways to form multiple variations of the invention. As a result, the invention is not limited to the specific examples described below, but only by the claims and their equivalents.
FIG. 1 shows a flow chart of a method of displaying a plurality of errors on a human machine interface. In the present exemplary embodiment of the method of displaying a plurality of errors on a human machine interface, various graphical elements are created and modified by those human machine interfaces as shown in fig. 2 and 4 and described later. The various operations of the present methods may be performed by one or more human machine interfaces and there is no need to bind any operation to any particular human machine interface, as a general purpose computer may be configured to operate as a human machine interface capable of performing the operations of the methods described herein.
The human machine interface displays a graphical view of an industrial automation environment (operation 100). Generally, an industrial automation environment includes a plurality of machines coupled to one another in various ways. The environment can be graphically displayed using any of a variety of methods including graphically representing each machine within the industrial automation environment. An exemplary graphical view of an industrial environment is shown in fig. 5.
In the present example, the human machine interface detects a plurality of error conditions related to machine operation within the industrial automation environment (operation 102). The human-machine interface also determines a plurality of locations within the graphical view that are associated with a plurality of error conditions (operation 104). The graphical view shown in FIG. 5 also includes a plurality of error conditions at a plurality of locations.
In an exemplary embodiment, determining a plurality of locations within the graphical view that are associated with a plurality of error conditions includes: a physical location of one or more machines corresponding to the plurality of error conditions is determined. In another exemplary embodiment, determining a plurality of locations within the graphical view that are associated with a plurality of error conditions further comprises: the physical location of controls or displays within one or more machines is determined.
The human machine interface identifies at least one set of error conditions from a plurality of error conditions based on the plurality of locations (operation 106). For example, error conditions having error locations that are clustered or close together will be grouped together. In some exemplary embodiments, identifying at least one set of error conditions from the plurality of error conditions based on the plurality of locations comprises: a distance between locations of at least one of the plurality of locations is determined.
The human-machine interface then displays a graphical representation of the at least one set of error conditions (operation 108). This grouping allows a user to quickly determine between different sets of errors the errors of interest in seeking a solution to the error condition. Grouping these errors also provides easier access to investigation of errors that may have been previously obscured by later errors. This provides the user with an easy way to ensure that all errors are checked. An exemplary graphical representation of several sets of error conditions is shown in FIG. 6.
In some implementations, the at least one set of graphical representations of error conditions, when selected by a user, results in the display of an error report. The error report may include: a number of error conditions within the at least one set of error conditions, a representation of a current error identification within the at least one set of error conditions, a current error description, a navigational control for navigating between error conditions within the at least one set of error conditions, and the like. An exemplary error report is shown in fig. 7.
In some implementations, the representation of the current misidentification includes a graphical representation. In some exemplary embodiments, the navigation control includes a next error control and a previous error control. These error controls may take any of a wide variety of forms. For example, using a touch screen, sliding an error report in one direction may trigger the display of the next error, while sliding an error report in the opposite direction may trigger the display of the previous error. In further examples, the graphical representation of the at least one set of error conditions includes a number of errors within each of the at least one set of error conditions.
Referring now to FIG. 2, a human-machine interface 200 and the associated discussion are intended to provide a brief, general description of a suitable computing environment in which the processes illustrated in FIG. 1 may be implemented. Many other configurations of computing devices and software computing systems may be utilized to implement a system for displaying multiple errors on a human-machine interface.
The human-machine interface 200 may be any type of computing system capable of processing graphical elements, such as a server computer, a client computer, an internet appliance, or any combination or variation thereof. FIG. 4, discussed in more detail subsequently, provides a more detailed illustration of an exemplary human-machine interface. In practice, the human-machine interface 200 may be implemented as a single computing system, but may also be implemented in a distributed manner across multiple computing systems. For example, the human-machine interface 200 may represent the following server system (not shown): with the server system, computer systems (not shown) running software 206 may communicate to support human-machine interface features. However, the human-machine interface 200 may also represent a computer system running software 206. In practice, the human-machine interface 200 is provided as an example of a general purpose computing system that becomes a special purpose system capable of operating as a human-machine interface when implementing the method shown in FIG. 1.
The human machine interface 200 includes a processor 202, a storage system 204, and software 206. The processor 202 is communicatively coupled with a storage system 204. The storage system 204 stores human machine interface software 206, which human machine interface software 206, when executed by the processor 202, directs the human machine interface 200 to operate as described for the method shown in fig. 1.
Still referring to FIG. 2, the processor 202 may include a microprocessor and other circuitry that retrieves and executes the human interface software 206 from the memory system 204. Processor 202 may be implemented in a single processing device, but may also be distributed across multiple processing devices or subsystems that cooperate in executing program instructions. Examples of processor 202 include general purpose central processing units, special purpose processors, and graphics processors, as well as any other type of processing device.
The storage system 204 may include any storage medium readable by the processor 202 and capable of storing human interface software 206. Storage system 204 may include volatile and nonvolatile, removable and non-removable media implemented in any method or technology for storage of information, such as computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules or other data. The storage system 204 may be implemented as a single storage device, but may also be implemented across multiple storage devices or subsystems. The storage system 204 may include additional elements such as a controller capable of communicating with the processor 202.
Examples of storage media include random access memory, read only memory, magnetic, optical, and flash memory, as well as any combination or variation thereof, or any other type of storage media. In some implementations, the storage medium may be a non-transitory storage medium. In some implementations, at least a portion of the storage medium may be transitory. It should be understood that the storage medium is not a propagating signal in any case.
The human interface software 206 comprises computer program instructions, firmware, or some other form of machine-readable processing instructions for the methods illustrated in fig. 1 embodied therein. The human interface software 206 may be implemented as a single application, but may also be implemented as multiple applications. The human interface software 206 may be a stand-alone application, but may also be implemented within other applications distributed across multiple devices, including but not limited to other human interface software and operating system software.
In general, the human-machine interface software 206, when loaded into the processor 202 and executed, may transform the processor 202 and human-machine interface 200 as a whole from a general-purpose computing system into a special-purpose computing system customized to function as a human-machine interface as described by the method and associated discussion shown in FIG. 1.
Encoding the human interface software 206 may also transform the physical structure of the storage system 204. The particular transformation of physical structure may depend on various factors in different implementations of this description. Examples of such factors include, but are not limited to: the technology used to implement the storage media of storage system 204, whether the computer storage media is characterized as primary or secondary storage, and the like.
For example, if the computer storage medium is implemented as semiconductor-based memory, the human interface software 206, when encoded in the semiconductor memory, may transform the physical state of the semiconductor memory. For example, the human interface software 206 may transform the state of transistors, capacitors, or other discrete circuit elements that make up the semiconductor memory.
Similar transformations may occur with respect to magnetic media or optical media. Other transformations of physical media are possible without departing from the scope of the present description, with the foregoing examples provided only to facilitate this discussion.
Referring again to fig. 1 and 2, the error data 208 is transformed by operation of the human-machine interface 200 using human-machine interface software 206 to produce a grouped error 210. As an example, error data 208 may be considered to be transformed from one state to another through transformation of various elements of the graphics error data contained therein.
The human-machine interface 200 may have additional devices, features, or functionality. Optionally, the human-machine interface 200 may have an input device such as a keyboard, a mouse, a voice input device, or a touch input device, and the like. Output devices such as a display, speakers, printer, and other types of output devices may also be included. The human-machine interface 200 may also include communication connections and devices that allow the human-machine interface 200 to communicate with other devices, such as wired or wireless networks in a distributed computing and communication environment. These devices are well known in the art and need not be discussed in detail herein.
FIG. 3 illustrates a workflow diagram of a workflow associated with the design of human-machine interface graphical elements. FIG. 3 is included to illustrate an environment in which a human-machine interface is developed and used.
The graphic 304 is designed within a design editor 302. The graph 304 includes 4 components: static 1 component 306, dynamic 1 component 308, dynamic 2 component 310, and static 2 component 312. These 4 components may be arranged on one or more layers within the graphic 304.
Dynamic 1 component 308 and dynamic 2 component 310 may be converted into dynamic format files 314 that are dynamic 1. dynamic 316 and dynamic 2. dynamic 318, respectively. Static 1 component 306 and static 2 component 312 are converted into static format files 320 that are static 1.static 322 and static 2.static 324. These 4 files are then exported to intermediate editor 326 where the dynamic components can be edited to add properties and constraints (binding) in intermediate editor 326.
In an exemplary embodiment, the dynamic file is extensible markup language and the intermediate editor 326 comprises a markup language editor that provides a means for a user to add properties and constraints to the dynamic component. In some examples, the intermediate editor 326 includes an intermediate editor preview 332 in which the modified dynamic component can be previewed in conjunction with the static component associated with the modified dynamic component to ensure that the modification of the dynamic component is error free. In this example, the intermediate editor preview 332 displays an animated graphic 334 on a display device. The animated graphic 334 includes 4 components: static 1 component 322, modified dynamic 1 component 328, modified dynamic 2 component 330, and static 2 component 324.
Once the desired modifications to the dynamic component are completed in the intermediate editor, the graphics are exported to the screen editor 332 where the human interface screen is assembled and tested in the screen editor 332. In this example, the screen editor 332 displays animation graphics 1334 and 2336 for incorporation into the human interface screen.
The human-machine interface 338 is configured to display a plurality of human-machine interface screens, such as the human-machine interface screen 1340 and the human-machine interface screen 2342 shown in fig. 3. Animated graphical elements having all or any of these screens may correspond to first machine 344, second machine 346, and/or third machine 348.
FIG. 4 shows a block diagram of a computer system configured to operate as a human-machine interface 400. The method shown in fig. 1 is implemented on one or more human-machine interfaces 400 as shown in fig. 4. The human-machine interface 400 includes a communication interface 402, a display 404, an input device 406, an output device 408, a processor 410, and a storage system 412. The processor 410 is linked to the communication interface 402, the display 404, the input device 406, the output device 408, and the storage system 412. The storage system 412 includes a non-transitory memory device that stores operating software 414.
The communication interface 402 includes components that communicate over communication links, such as network cards, ports, radio frequency transceivers, processing circuitry, and software or some other communication device. The communication interface 402 may be configured to communicate over a metallic link, a wireless link, or an optical link. The communication interface 402 may be configured to use TDM, IP, ethernet, optical networking, wireless protocols, communication signaling, or some other communication format, including combinations thereof.
The display 404 may be any type of display capable of presenting information to a user. In some implementations, the display can include a touch screen. The input device 406 comprises any device capable of capturing user inputs and communicating those inputs to the computer-aided design system 400. The input device 406 may include a keyboard, a mouse, a touchpad, or some other user input means. Output device 408 comprises any device capable of delivering output from computer aided design system 400 to a user. Output device 408 may include a printer, a projector, a display, or some other user output apparatus. In some examples, the display 404, the input device 406, and the output device 408 may be external to the computer-aided design system 400 or may be omitted.
In this example, the human-machine interface 400 performs a number of methods stored as software 414 within a storage system 412. The results of these methods are displayed to the user via display 404 or output device 408. The input device 406 allows multiple machines to send machine data and error data to the human machine interface 400.
For example, the processor 410 receives machine data and/or error data from the communication interface 402 or the input device 406. The processor 410 then operates on the machine data and error data to generate a packet error message, which may be stored in the storage system 412, displayed on the display 404, or output through the output device 408.
FIG. 5 illustrates a human machine interface screen 500 displaying a plurality of errors. In the present exemplary embodiment, the industrial automation environment includes 6 machine systems 522 through 532 graphically illustrated on human machine interface screen 500.
Each of machines 522, 524, and 526 has 1 error represented by elements 502, 504, and 506. The machine 528 has 5 errors, represented generally by element 508. The machine 530 has 3 errors, represented generally by element 510. The machine 532 has 2 errors, indicated generally by element 512.
Note that the large number of error messages associated with errors on machines 528, 530, and 532 are unreadable because they are at least partially covered by other error messages.
FIG. 6 illustrates a human machine interface screen 500 displaying a plurality of errors grouped together from FIG. 5. In the present exemplary embodiment, 5 errors from machine 528 are grouped together into a single error element 600. The error element 600 includes a single error button indicating the number of errors in the error element 600 and 5 error labels representing the 5 errors in the group. Other embodiments may combine the 5 error tags into a single error tag. Three errors from the machine 530 are grouped together into a single error element 602. The error element 602 includes a single error button indicating the number of errors in the error element 602 and 3 error labels representing the three errors in the group. Other embodiments may combine the 3 error tags into a single error tag. Two errors from machine 532 are grouped together into a single error element 604. The error element 604 includes a single error button indicating the number of errors in the error element 604 and 2 error tags representing 2 errors in the group. Other embodiments may combine the two error tags into a single error tag. The single error from machines 502, 504, and 506 remains unchanged.
It should be noted that error elements 600, 602, and 604 include an indication of the number of errors each element contains, which is indicated by a numerical subscript within the graphic grouping error element.
FIG. 7 illustrates a human machine interface screen 500 displaying an error report for one of the errors from FIG. 6. When the user selects the grouping error element, an error report is displayed. This selection may occur through any of a variety of mechanisms including, but not limited to, touch screen, mouse click, cursor hover, and the like.
In the present exemplary embodiment, the user has selected the packet error element 600 from FIG. 6 for closer inspection. In response to the selection, an error report 700 is displayed. In the present exemplary embodiment, error report 700 includes a number of elements.
The error report 700 includes an error name or number 702, an error description 704, and an error report off button 712. Error report 700 also includes navigational controls 706, 708, and 710, which navigational controls 706, 708, and 710 are useful for navigating between each error grouped together into grouped error element 600. Navigation control 706 is a previous error control that, when selected by the user, causes error report 700 to display information related to the previous error. Navigation control 710 is a next error control that, when selected by the user, causes error report 700 to display information relating to the next error.
The foregoing description and the associated drawings teach the best mode of the invention. The appended claims set forth the scope of the invention. It is noted that some aspects of the best mode may not fall within the scope of the invention as specified by the claims. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the features described above can be combined in various ways to form multiple variations of the invention. As a result, the present invention is not limited to the specific embodiments described above, but only by the appended claims and their equivalents.
Claims (17)
1. One or more non-transitory computer-readable media having stored thereon program instructions to cause display of a plurality of errors, wherein the program instructions, when executed by a computing system, direct the computing system to at least:
initiating display of a graphical view of an industrial automation environment;
detecting a plurality of error conditions related to machine operation within the industrial automation environment;
determining a plurality of locations within the graphical view associated with the plurality of error conditions;
identifying at least one set of error conditions from the plurality of error conditions based on the plurality of locations; and
initiating display of a graphical representation of the at least one set of error conditions by an error element comprising a single error button indicating a number of errors in the at least one set of error conditions and a plurality of error labels, each error label of the plurality of error labels representing one error condition of the at least one set of error conditions,
wherein the graphical representation of the at least one set of error conditions, when selected by a user, results in the display of an error report in which only one error condition of the at least one set of error conditions is visible at a time, and navigation between error conditions within the at least one set of error conditions is performed using navigation controls.
2. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable media of claim 1, wherein determining a plurality of locations within the graphical view associated with the plurality of error conditions comprises: determining a physical location of one or more machines corresponding to the plurality of error conditions.
3. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable media of claim 2, wherein determining a plurality of locations within the graphical view associated with the plurality of error conditions further comprises: determining a physical location of a control or display within the one or more machines.
4. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable media of claim 1, wherein the error report further comprises:
a number of error conditions within the at least one set of error conditions;
a representation of a current error identification within the at least one set of error conditions; and
the current error description.
5. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable media of claim 4, wherein the representation of the current error identification comprises a graphical representation.
6. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable media of claim 4, wherein the navigation control includes a next error control and a previous error control.
7. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable media of claim 1, wherein identifying at least one set of error conditions from the plurality of error conditions based on the plurality of locations comprises: determining a distance between locations within at least one of the plurality of locations.
8. A method for displaying a plurality of errors on a human-machine interface, the method comprising:
displaying a graphical view of an industrial automation environment;
detecting a plurality of error conditions related to machine operation within the industrial automation environment;
determining a plurality of locations within the graphical view associated with the plurality of error conditions;
identifying at least one set of error conditions from the plurality of error conditions based on the plurality of locations; and
displaying, by an error element, a graphical representation of the at least one set of error conditions, the error element including a single error button indicating a number of errors in the at least one set of error conditions and a plurality of error labels, each error label of the plurality of error labels representing one error condition of the at least one set of error conditions,
wherein the graphical representation of the at least one set of error conditions, when selected by a user, results in the display of an error report in which only one error condition of the at least one set of error conditions is visible at a time, and navigation between error conditions within the at least one set of error conditions is performed using navigation controls.
9. The method of claim 8, wherein determining a plurality of locations within the graphical view associated with the plurality of error conditions comprises: determining a physical location of one or more machines corresponding to the plurality of error conditions.
10. The method of claim 9, wherein determining a plurality of locations within the graphical view associated with the plurality of error conditions further comprises: determining a physical location of a control or display within the one or more machines.
11. The method of claim 8, wherein the error report further comprises:
a number of error conditions within the at least one set of error conditions;
a representation of a current error identification within the at least one set of error conditions; and
the current error description.
12. The method of claim 11, wherein the representation of the current error marker comprises a graphical representation.
13. The method of claim 11, wherein the navigational controls include a next error control and a previous error control.
14. The method of claim 8, wherein identifying at least one group of error conditions from the plurality of error conditions based on the plurality of locations comprises: determining a distance between locations within at least one of the plurality of locations.
15. A human-machine interface for displaying a plurality of errors within an industrial automation environment, the human-machine interface comprising:
a communication interface configured to receive a plurality of error conditions related to machine operation within the industrial automation environment; and
a processor coupled to the communication interface, the processor configured to: initiating display of a graphical view of an industrial automation environment; determining a plurality of locations within the graphical view associated with the plurality of error conditions; identifying at least one set of error conditions from the plurality of error conditions based on the plurality of locations; and initiating display of a graphical representation of the at least one set of error conditions by an error element, the error element including a single error button indicating a number of errors in the at least one set of error conditions and a plurality of error labels, each error label of the plurality of error labels representing one error condition of the at least one set of error conditions,
wherein the graphical representation of the at least one set of error conditions, when selected by a user, results in the display of an error report in which only one error condition of the at least one set of error conditions is visible at a time, and navigation between error conditions within the at least one set of error conditions is performed using navigation controls.
16. The human-machine interface of claim 15, wherein determining a plurality of locations within the graphical view associated with the plurality of error conditions comprises: determining a physical location of one or more machines corresponding to the plurality of error conditions.
17. The human-machine interface of claim 15, wherein the error report further comprises:
a number of error conditions within the at least one set of error conditions;
a representation of a current error identification within the at least one set of error conditions; and
the current error description.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201710918102.5A CN107844103B (en) | 2012-11-12 | 2012-11-12 | Method and device for displaying multiple errors on human-computer interface |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201710918102.5A CN107844103B (en) | 2012-11-12 | 2012-11-12 | Method and device for displaying multiple errors on human-computer interface |
| CN201210451117.2A CN103926914B (en) | 2012-11-12 | 2012-11-12 | For showing multiple wrong method and devices in man-machine interface |
Related Parent Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201210451117.2A Division CN103926914B (en) | 2012-11-12 | 2012-11-12 | For showing multiple wrong method and devices in man-machine interface |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN107844103A CN107844103A (en) | 2018-03-27 |
| CN107844103B true CN107844103B (en) | 2020-10-23 |
Family
ID=51145173
Family Applications (2)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201710918102.5A Active CN107844103B (en) | 2012-11-12 | 2012-11-12 | Method and device for displaying multiple errors on human-computer interface |
| CN201210451117.2A Active CN103926914B (en) | 2012-11-12 | 2012-11-12 | For showing multiple wrong method and devices in man-machine interface |
Family Applications After (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201210451117.2A Active CN103926914B (en) | 2012-11-12 | 2012-11-12 | For showing multiple wrong method and devices in man-machine interface |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (2) | CN107844103B (en) |
Family Cites Families (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DE10055250A1 (en) * | 2000-11-08 | 2002-06-06 | Siemens Ag | Software tool for monitoring an automation device for faults |
| CN1300960C (en) * | 2002-08-06 | 2007-02-14 | 华为技术有限公司 | Fault warning data display and treating method of communication monitoring equipment |
| JP2007536634A (en) * | 2004-05-04 | 2007-12-13 | フィッシャー−ローズマウント・システムズ・インコーポレーテッド | Service-oriented architecture for process control systems |
| JP2006072677A (en) * | 2004-09-02 | 2006-03-16 | Mitsubishi Electric Corp | Alarm display apparatus |
-
2012
- 2012-11-12 CN CN201710918102.5A patent/CN107844103B/en active Active
- 2012-11-12 CN CN201210451117.2A patent/CN103926914B/en active Active
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN107844103A (en) | 2018-03-27 |
| CN103926914B (en) | 2017-11-07 |
| CN103926914A (en) | 2014-07-16 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US9684882B2 (en) | Permitted assignment user interface | |
| CA2795183C (en) | Temporary formatting and charting of selected data | |
| CN107992427A (en) | Create method, apparatus, equipment and its storage medium of operational trials scene | |
| JP2014164765A (en) | Workflow generation system for printing system, method and computer readable medium | |
| US9122799B1 (en) | System, method, and computer program for software testing project design and execution utilizing a mockup | |
| CN101414301A (en) | Content management system that renders multiple types of data to different applications | |
| CN106991036B (en) | Prompting method and system for information input abnormity | |
| CN112668290A (en) | Dynamic form generation method and system based on gridding design | |
| CN108089858B (en) | Method and device for creating visual interface | |
| US9934291B2 (en) | Dynamic presentation of a results set by a form-based software application | |
| EP2592507B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for the display of multiple errors on a human-machine interface | |
| JP5303116B2 (en) | Screen editing device and its program | |
| JP2024502516A (en) | Data annotation methods, apparatus, systems, devices and storage media | |
| KR101431995B1 (en) | Facility management device, screen display method, and recording medium | |
| EP2607976A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for computer aided design of human-machine interface animated graphical elements | |
| CN117472704A (en) | Machine room management method, equipment and storage medium based on three-dimensional model | |
| CN112256259A (en) | Method, device and equipment for processing thinking guide graph and storage medium | |
| CN107844103B (en) | Method and device for displaying multiple errors on human-computer interface | |
| CN108279962B (en) | Method and device for creating visual data display interface | |
| CN114428601A (en) | Visual manuscript checking method and device | |
| JP6552162B2 (en) | Information processing apparatus, information processing method, and program | |
| JP2013130872A (en) | Map image providing system, map image providing method and program | |
| CN114594945A (en) | Method, device, system, equipment and medium for generating advanced popup selection frame | |
| CN113704650A (en) | Information display method, device, system, equipment and storage medium | |
| CN111124393A (en) | Editing method and platform of algorithm logic, electronic equipment and storage medium |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant |