CN107656245A - A kind of method being applied to information fusion in radar signal sorting - Google Patents
A kind of method being applied to information fusion in radar signal sorting Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN107656245A CN107656245A CN201710722269.4A CN201710722269A CN107656245A CN 107656245 A CN107656245 A CN 107656245A CN 201710722269 A CN201710722269 A CN 201710722269A CN 107656245 A CN107656245 A CN 107656245A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- mrow
- msub
- mtd
- mtr
- epsiv
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01S—RADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
- G01S7/00—Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00
- G01S7/02—Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00 of systems according to group G01S13/00
- G01S7/28—Details of pulse systems
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Radar, Positioning & Navigation (AREA)
- Remote Sensing (AREA)
- Radar Systems Or Details Thereof (AREA)
- Medicines Containing Antibodies Or Antigens For Use As Internal Diagnostic Agents (AREA)
Abstract
The invention discloses a kind of method information fusion being applied in radar signal sorting, belong to radar signal processing field.The present invention carries out pixel-based fusion before radar signal sorting to pulse descriptive word (PDW), and feature-based fusion has been carried out to separation results after sorting.The Time Registration Method based on one-level pulse arrival time (TOA) difference matching is proposed in pixel-based fusion, pair pulse application D S evidence theories reached simultaneously sentence association to obtain new PDW;The parameter unification of same radar will be described in feature-based fusion and to separation results progress reliability order.Solve single receiving device and receive pulse missing sorting failure that may be present, and the problem of same portion's radar characterising parameter is incomplete same after sorting.Simulation result shows that the success rate of radar signal sorting can be effectively improved by pixel-based fusion, and the application of feature-based fusion, which can obtain, more succinctly intuitively radiates source information.
Description
Technical field
The invention belongs to radar signal processing field, and in particular to information fusion is applied in radar signal sorting by one kind
Method.
Background technology
With the development of science and technology, the electromagnetic signal environment of modern battlefield is increasingly sophisticated, and radiation source density is multiplied,
Electromagnetic signal pattern is also complicated and changeable all the more.Modern radar has multimode and disguise, and a radar often has a variety of works
Operation mode realizes different purposes functions, and each pattern also has a corresponding technical characteristic parameter, and the thunder such as low probability of intercept
Up to the utilization of interference protection measure, the Partial Feature parameter that scouting receiving device obtains missing is present, have imperfect, uncertain
Characteristic, bring very big difficulty for radar signal sorting.In view of each scouting receiving device in certain section of observation time
Information has complementarity, and the pulse descriptive word (PDW) that can be received by the method for information fusion to receiver merges
Sorted again after processing, obtain separating effect more more preferable than single receiving device.And same scouting receiving device Continuous Observation sorting
The result gone out should possess the characteristics of repeating, but be influenceed by factors such as deinterleaving algorithm and measurement accuracy, describe same portion's radar
Parameter may be incomplete same, it is by the fusions of separation results that each parameter is unified and the radar to sub-electing carries out confidence level
Sequence, succinctly can intuitively react the radiation source information in observation time.
At present, domestic and foreign scholars are mainly to being radiated after sorting for information fusion and the research direction of radar signal sorting
Source carries out fusion recognition.Wu Zhen in 2015 is strong et al. probabilistic neural network, more meta-attribute blending algorithms and D-S evidence theory
Effect ground combines, it is proposed that a kind of information fusion model on recognizing radar radiation source, the model is first with probabilistic neural net
The radar parameter that network is obtained to radar reconnaissance equipment is identified, and when recognition result is not unique, then uses multivariate information fusion
Algorithm is identified again for the possible radar model that neural network recognization goes out, and finally determines recognition result.Before sorting
Limited in terms of pulse descriptive word fusion by document, can not find out related article, if but data before sorting are merged, it can retain
More battle field informations, probability of detection and recognition capability to target can be effectively improved.
The content of the invention
It is an object of the invention to provide information fusion is applied in radar signal sorting, to realize than single equipment more
Good separating effect, obtain a kind of more succinct intuitively radiation the of source information and information fusion is applied in radar signal sorting
Method.
The purpose of the present invention is realized by following technical solution:
The present invention carries out pixel-based fusion first against the PDW that different receivers obtain, and next same receiver is connected
The pulse data that continuous observation time obtains carries out the fusion of separation results, i.e., separation results is carried out with feature-based fusion, therefore believe
Application of the breath fusion in radar signal sorting merges two parts comprising data level PDW fusions and feature level separation results.
A kind of 1. method being applied to information fusion in radar signal sorting, it is characterised in that melt including data level PDW
Close and feature level separation results merge two parts, wherein:
Data level PDW fusions mainly include the following steps that:
(1) time alignment, the identical time will be registrated to from the unsynchronized data of each receiver;
(1.1) one-level TOA difference matchings are carried out to two groups of observation data of same period, by the way that observation data are calculated
One-level TOA it is poor;
(1.2) by etoa1And etoa2Order composition l n dimensional vector ns X1(i)、X2(j), i.e., select what l pulse formed respectively
Stream of pulses is matched
(1.3) X is counted1And X (i)2(j) number k and l dimension data of the corresponding error in measurement error between is corresponding
Error and error;
(1.4) first order calculation TOA differences likelihood;
(1.5) it is best match position to set corresponding error minimum value (min { er (i, j) }), defines first group in error
In the range of relative time for two groups of observation data relative time Δ t;
(2) Attribute Association, carrier frequency, pulsewidth support are calculated to the pulse reached in the same time after time alignment;
Carrier frequency f, pulsewidth pw diversity factor are mapped on the section of [0,1] by probability assignment function, calculate two ginsengs
Several supports;
(3) overall support is sought using D-S fusion formulas, whether setting thresholding judges to reach pulse in the same time from same
Radiation source;
D-S evidence theory represents interested proposition collection with identification framework U, defines the basic probability assignment function on U
m:2U→ [0,1], meet:
M () is referred to as the Basic Probability As-signment on U, if m (A) ≠ 0, A is referred to as a burnt member, m (A) reactions to A can
Reliability size;
For there is the inference system of two features, the probability assignment of two features is respectively m1、m2, for subset A, ask it
Combine the overall Basic Probability As-signment under latter two feature collective effectD-S rule:
WhereinFor conflict item, if K ≠ 1, it is determined that m Basic Probability As-signment;If K=1,
Then think m1With m2Contradiction, it is not necessary to combine.
(4) threshold judgement, a new data value is fused into the different pieces of information mutually in the same time from identical radiation source, and
Data are arranged in new PDW by the sequencing of arrival time,
If signal comes from same radiation source, calculate its arithmetic average as fusion after this moment pulse carrier frequency,
Pwm value, for not being the pulse reached simultaneously, we sort it according to the first later of arrival time, obtain more comprehensive
Information;
Wherein, for the situation of pulse advance, arrival time value after definition fusion for known two arrival times compared with
Small value, pwm value are the larger pulse back edge of numerical value and the difference of the arrival time newly defined;Situation about being included for pulse, it is fixed
Pulse arrival time and pwm value after justice fusion are all the corresponding parameter of the pulse included;If without above-mentioned phenomenon, by arrival
Time sequencing arranges.
The fusion of feature level separation results mainly includes the following steps that:
Carried out by calculating the support of tri- its carrier frequency, pulsewidth, PRI attributes, then using D-S evidence theory rule of combination
Attribute fusion obtains overall support, and each characteristic parameter for describing same portion's radar is weighted to obtain unified parameter.
Calculate the carrier frequency f supports m of radarfWith pulsewidth support mpw;
PRI points are fixed and irregular two types:
A. separation results are the normal radar that PRI is fixed:
One separation results of one group of observation period are Ta, a separation results of another group of observation period are Tb, then
The difference of the two separation results is Δ Tab=| Ta-Tb|, the PRI supports m of two separation resultsPRIFor:
TεFor the repetition period error of reconnaissance system;
B. separation results are staggered PRI radar:
So that two is irregular as an example, the skeleton cycle of one group of observed result is Ta, two irregular recurrence intervals are Ta1And Ta2, another group
Separation results show skeleton cycle Tb, two irregular recurrence intervals are Tb1And Tb2;The now PRI supports m of separation resultsPRIFor:
Wherein, PRI difference DELTA T=| Ta-Tb|, Δ Tabi=| Tai-Tbi|, i=1,2;
Probability assignment function formula under n evidence collective effect is:
If overall support is more than the threshold value of setting, two separation results for judging to be compared describe same portion
Radar, feature-based fusion is taken turns doing to the result obtained after all detecting data sortings in observation time, if description is all same
One radar, then using the PRI variances inverse of separation results as weight coefficient, realize the unification to same portion's radar signature parameter;
In order to avoid due to sorting mistake caused by deinterleaving algorithm, the PRI parameters of such as sorting display are actual PRI times
Number, we also need statistics to describe the umber of pulse and frequency number of this radar, separation results during realizing that parameter is unified
The frequency of appearance is high and the umber of pulse that uses is more, it is believed that this separation results is with a high credibility, passes through the arteries and veins to describing different radars
Rush number and carry out sort method, can intuitively obtain the radiation source information in observation period.
The beneficial effects of the present invention are:
The data that some receivers for observing same target receive, due to environment, noise and may be deposited
The factor such as pulse missing influence, may result in sorting failure using the directly sorting of single receiving device reconnaissance data.
The present invention carries out pixel-based fusion first against the PDW that different receivers obtain, and solves single receiving device reception pulse and loses
Sorting failure problem that may be present after mistake;
Next the fusion of separation results is carried out to the pulse data that the same receiver Continuous Observation time obtains, i.e., to dividing
Select result to carry out feature-based fusion, solve the problems, such as that the characterising parameter of same portion's radar after sorting is incomplete same.
Brief description of the drawings
Fig. 1 is PDW Fusion Models;
Fig. 2 is characterized a grade separation results Fusion Model;
Fig. 3 is PDW time alignment schematic diagrams;
Fig. 4 is fusion rule;
Fig. 5 is lossing signal separation results;
Fig. 6 is signal sorting result after fusion.
Embodiment
The embodiment of the present invention is described further below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings:
A kind of method information fusion being applied in radar signal sorting, is specifically divided into data level PDW fusions and feature
The fusion of level separation results, model is as depicted in figs. 1 and 2.
Data level PDW fusions comprise the following steps:
Step 1:Time alignment.It is mutually solely due to being placed in reception of each receiver of diverse location to radar signal
It is vertical to carry out, it is understood that there may be the different delays of communication network, therefore each receiver on call time and there may be the time difference.Melting
, it is necessary in same temporal referencing system, nonsynchronous information will be registrated into phase from the conversion of the data of multiple receivers before closing
The same fusion moment.Alignment principles are as shown in figure 3, specific method is as follows:
1. two groups of observation data of pair same period carry out one-level TOA difference matchings, by the way that observation data are calculated
One-level TOA is poor.
etoa1(i)=toa1(i+1)-toa1(i), i=1,2 ... n1-1 (1)
etoa2(j)=toa2(j+1)-toa2(j), j=1,2 ... n2-1 (2)
N in formula1And n2Respectively observe the umber of pulse of data, n1- 1 and n2- 1 is respectively the one-level TOA that will be matched
The umber of pulse of difference.
2. by etoa1And etoa2Order composition l n dimensional vector ns X1(i)、X2(j).The pulse of l pulse composition is selected respectively
Stream is matched.
X1(i)=[etoa1(i),etoa1(i+1)…etoa1], (i+l-1) i=1,2 ... (n1-1)-l+1 (3)
X2(j)=[etoa2(j),etoa2(j+1)…etoa2], (j+l-1) j=1,2 ... (n2-1)-l+1 (4)
3. count X1And X (i)2(j) number k and l dimension data of the corresponding error in measurement error between corresponds to error
And error.
Error (i, j)=| X1(i)-X2(j) |, i=1,2 ... n1-l;J=1,2 ... n2-l (5)
First order calculation TOA difference likelihoods:
4. being ranked up by the size of the number k in error, the position that taking makes k be maximum is best match position;If k
Number for maximum is not 1, then relatively more corresponding error and error.Setting corresponds to error minimum value (min { er (i, j) })
Best match position, define the relative time Δ t that first group of relative time in error range is two groups of observation data.
Δ t=toa1(i)-toa2(j) (7)
I, j is at best match position.
Step 2:Attribute Association, carrier frequency, pulsewidth support are calculated to the pulse reached in the same time after time alignment.Pass through
Carrier frequency f, pulsewidth pw diversity factor are mapped on the section of [0,1] by probability assignment function, calculate the support of two parameters.Such as
One signal of fruit is received by two receivers simultaneously, for a certain property parameters, such as carrier frequency f, the measurement of one group of observation data
It is worth for fa, another group of measured value is fb, then the difference of the two measured values is Δ fab=| fa-fb|.Now, the two measured values it
Between similarity mfFor:
Wherein fεIt is the measurement tolerance of sensor, selects the measurement accuracy for 4 times.
Similarly obtain the pulsewidth support m of two measured valuespw:
Step 3:Overall support is sought using D-S fusion formulas, setting thresholding judges to reach whether pulse comes from the same time
Same radiation source.Scout signal of the measurement for the echo signal basic parameter that receiving device provides depending on target emanation source radiation
Pattern, because the factors such as ambient noise, multipath influence, it may result in the loss or deviation of signal measurement parameter.D-S evidences
Theory is the popularization in Bayesian inference method, can preferably describe " not knowing " and " not knowing " type problem, therefore can
The PDW parameters received with being detectd using DS evidence theories formula to different receivers carry out fusion treatment.
D-S evidence theory represents interested proposition collection with identification framework U, defines the basic probability assignment function on U
m:2U→ [0,1], meet:
M () is referred to as the Basic Probability As-signment on U.If m (A) ≠ 0, A is referred to as a burnt member, m (A) reactions to A can
Reliability size.
Method of Evidence Theory has oneself rational composition rule, abbreviation D-S rules.For there is the reasoning system of two features
System, the probability assignment of two features is respectively m1、m2, for subset A, ask it to combine total under latter two feature collective effect
Body Basic Probability As-signmentD-S rules such as formula (11) shown in.
WhereinFor conflict item.If K ≠ 1, it is determined that m Basic Probability As-signment;If K=1,
Then think m1With m2Contradiction, it is not necessary to combine.
Step 4:Threshold judgement, a new data are fused into the different pieces of information mutually in the same time from identical radiation source
Value, and data are arranged in new PDW by the sequencing of arrival time.
By the Time Registration Method based on one-level TOA difference matchings, asynchronous information is registrated to identical and merged by us
At the moment, by the data association technique based on D-S evidence theory, the letter that different receivers receive in synchronization can be calculated
Number the degree of association, by compared with thresholding 0.5, we can be determined that whether signal carrys out same radiation source.If signal is from same
Radiation source, then calculate carrier frequency, pwm value of its arithmetic average as this moment pulse after fusion.For not being to reach simultaneously
Pulse, we by its according to arrival time first later sequence, obtain more comprehensive information.Specific fusion rule is shown in Fig. 4
It is shown.
1) situation of pulse advance is directed to, the arrival time value after definition fusion is smaller for known two arrival times
Value, pwm value are the larger pulse back edge of numerical value and the difference of the arrival time newly defined.
2) situation about being included for pulse, pulse arrival time and pwm value after definition fusion are all the pulse pair included
The parameter answered.
If 3) arranged without above-mentioned phenomenon by arrival time order.
Feature level separation results fusion method is as follows:
, can be by calculating its carrier frequency, pulsewidth, PRI tri- for the separation results under same receiver difference observation period
The support of individual attribute, attribute fusion is carried out to emitter characteristic parameter using based on the rule of combination of D-S evidence theory, obtained
Overall support.
The carrier frequency of radar, the attributes similarity of pulsewidth are identical with formula (8), (9), and PRI points are fixed and irregular two types.
1) separation results are the normal radar that PRI is fixed:
One separation results of one group of observation period are Ta, a separation results of another group of observation period are Tb, then
The difference of the two separation results is Δ Tab=| Ta-Tb|.The PRI similarities m of two separation resultsPRIFor:
TεFor the repetition period error of reconnaissance system.
2) separation results are staggered PRI radar:
So that two is irregular as an example, the skeleton cycle of one group of observed result is Ta, two irregular recurrence intervals are Ta1And Ta2, another group
Separation results show skeleton cycle Tb, two irregular recurrence intervals are Tb1And Tb2.The now PRI similarities m of separation resultsPRIFor:
Wherein, PRI difference DELTA T=| Ta-Tb|, Δ Tabi=| Tai-Tbi|, i=1,2.
The D-S rules of formula (11) are that we obtain after sorting for the only two evidences i.e. formula of carrier frequency and pulsewidth
New parameter PRI is arrived.Probability assignment function formula under n evidence collective effect is:
If overall support is more than the threshold value of setting, two separation results for judging to be compared describe same portion
Radar.Feature-based fusion is taken turns doing to the result obtained after all detecting data sortings in observation time, if description is all same
One radar, then using the PRI variances inverse of separation results as weight coefficient, realize the unification to same portion's radar signature parameter.
In order to avoid due to sorting mistake caused by deinterleaving algorithm, the PRI parameters of such as sorting display are actual PRI times
Number, we also need statistics to describe the umber of pulse and frequency number of this radar during realizing that parameter is unified.Separation results
The frequency of appearance is high and the umber of pulse that uses is more, it is believed that this separation results is with a high credibility, is similarly only sorted by less umber of pulse
Obtained result or separation results only occurs once in multiple sorting, then it is assumed that the confidence level of separation results is relatively low.By right
The umber of pulse for describing different radars carries out sort method, can intuitively obtain the radiation source information in observation period.
Embodiment:
Embodiment 1:Assuming that have two reconnaissance equipment receivers while work, each information mutual scouted receiving device and obtained
Difference, the PDW received by pixel-based fusion algorithm to receiver carries out fusion treatment and forms new PDW, before and after fusion
PDW sorted respectively with conventional SDIF methods.Emulation constructs the pulse descriptive word of two normal radar signal mixing, and it is joined
Number is as shown in table 1 below.
The radar simulation parameter setting of table 1
Pulse miss rate be 50% under conditions of, deleted signal with merge after signal sorting Comparative result, such as the institute of table 2
Show.
Separation results before and after the pixel-based fusion of table 2
If from table 2 it can be seen that there is missing as shown in the first via in table and second road signal in reception signal, it is impossible to correct
Sub-elect PRI parameters and be 400us and 500us radar, and more umber of pulses are obtained after pixel-based fusion, Neng Goucheng
Work(sorts two radars.
Embodiment 2:Test signal intercepts and captures influence of the Loss Rate to signal sorting.Using the simulation parameter of table 1, difference is lost
Normal radar signal under mistake rate and the signal after pixel-based fusion have carried out conventional sorting.To the single channel of pulse missing be present
Signal and the result that is sorted after pixel-based fusion are as shown in Figure 5 and Figure 6.
From fig. 5, it can be seen that in pulse missing rate during 10%~45%, the two paths of signals that loss be present all can
Successfully sub-elect two radars of setting;When pulse missing rate reaches 50%, the two paths of signals of loss can only be sub-elected correctly
PRI parameters are 500us normal radar, it is impossible to correct to sub-elect the radar that PRI parameters are 400us.It is from fig. 6, it can be seen that logical
After crossing pixel-based fusion, remain to successfully sort when pulse missing rate reaches 60%, demonstrate the calculation of radar signal pixel-based fusion
Method sorts the validity of success rate to improving.
Embodiment 3:Test feature level separation results syncretizing effect.Emulation 5 sights continuous to a certain reconnaissance receiver first
The PDW packets reported after survey are sorted respectively, and separation results are as shown in table 3.It is measured data that data are sorted in emulation,
Deinterleaving algorithm still uses SDIF methods.
The lower separation results of more than 3 observation of table
Multiple separation results that table 3 is obtained carry out feature-based fusion, and obtained result is as shown in table 4.Though it can be seen that
So in the case where time domain is 1 observation period, this thunder of PRI=1.9613ms described in 76 pulses that receiver detects
The umber of pulse reached is only 22, in addition time domain be 5 observation period under receiver do not detect describe this radar
Pulse signal, but pass through repeatedly observation sorting accumulation, we can exclude sorting failure possibility, determine this PRI=
1.9613ms normal radar be implicitly present in.
The feature-based fusion result of table 4
The preferred embodiments of the present invention are the foregoing is only, are not intended to limit the invention, for the skill of this area
For art personnel, the present invention can have various modifications and variations.Within the spirit and principles of the invention, that is made any repaiies
Change, equivalent substitution, improvement etc., should be included in the scope of the protection.
Claims (6)
- A kind of 1. method being applied to information fusion in radar signal sorting, it is characterised in that including data level PDW fusion and Feature level separation results merge two parts, wherein:Data level PDW fusions mainly include the following steps that:(1) time alignment, the identical time will be registrated to from the unsynchronized data of each receiver;(2) Attribute Association, carrier frequency, pulsewidth support are calculated to the pulse reached in the same time after time alignment;(3) overall support is sought using D-S fusion formulas, setting thresholding judges to reach whether pulse comes from same radiation in the same time Source;(4) threshold judgement, is fused into a new data value to the different pieces of information mutually in the same time from identical radiation source, and by number According to being arranged in new PDW by the sequencing of arrival time,The fusion of feature level separation results mainly includes the following steps that:Attribute is carried out by calculating the support of tri- its carrier frequency, pulsewidth, PRI attributes, then using D-S evidence theory rule of combination Fusion obtains overall support, and each characteristic parameter for describing same portion's radar is weighted to obtain unified parameter.
- A kind of 2. method being applied to information fusion in radar signal sorting according to claim 1, it is characterised in that Step (1) is specially in described data level PDW fusions:(1.1) one-level TOA difference matchings are carried out to two groups of observation data of same period, by observation data are calculated one Level TOA is poor:etoa1(i)=toa1(i+1)-toa1(i), i=1,2 ... n1-1etoa2(j)=toa2(j+1)-toa2(j), j=1,2 ... n2-1N in formula1And n2Respectively observe the umber of pulse of data, n1- 1 and n2- 1 is respectively the one-level TOA differences that will be matched Umber of pulse;(1.2) by etoa1And etoa2Order composition l n dimensional vector ns X1(i)、X2(j) stream of pulses of l pulse composition, i.e., is selected respectively Matched:X1(i)=[etoa1(i),etoa1(i+1)…etoa1], (i+l-1) i=1,2 ... (n1-1)-l+1X2(j)=[etoa2(j),etoa2(j+1)…etoa2], (j+l-1) j=1,2 ... (n2-1)-l+1(1.3) X is counted1And X (i)2(j) number k and l dimension data of the corresponding error in measurement error between corresponds to error And error:Error (i, j)=| X1(i)-X2(j) |, i=1,2 ... n1-l;J=1,2 ... n2-l(1.4) first order calculation TOA differences likelihood:<mrow> <mi>&epsiv;</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mfrac> <mi>k</mi> <mi>l</mi> </mfrac> <mo>&times;</mo> <mn>100</mn> <mi>%</mi> </mrow>It is ranked up by the size of the number k in error, the position that taking makes k be maximum is best match position;If k is maximum The number of value is not 1, then relatively more corresponding error and error;(1.5) it is best match position to set corresponding error minimum value (min { er (i, j) }), defines first group in error range Interior relative time is the relative time Δ t of two groups of observation data:Δ t=toa1(i)-toa2(j)Wherein, i, j are at best match position.
- A kind of 3. method being applied to information fusion in radar signal sorting according to claim 1, it is characterised in that Step (2) is specially in described data level PDW fusions:Carrier frequency f, pulsewidth pw diversity factor are mapped on the section of [0,1] by probability assignment function, two parameters of calculating Support;The carrier frequency f measured values of one group of observation data are fa, another group of measured value is fb, then the difference of the two measured values is Δ fab=| fa-fb|;Support m between the two carrier frequency f measured valuesfFor:<mrow> <msub> <mi>m</mi> <mi>f</mi> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mfenced open = "{" close = ""> <mtable> <mtr> <mtd> <mrow> <mn>1</mn> <mo>,</mo> </mrow> </mtd> <mtd> <mrow> <msub> <mi>&Delta;f</mi> <mrow> <mi>a</mi> <mi>b</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>&le;</mo> <msub> <mi>f</mi> <mi>&epsiv;</mi> </msub> </mrow> </mtd> </mtr> <mtr> <mtd> <mrow> <mfrac> <mrow> <mo>|</mo> <mrow> <msub> <mi>&Delta;f</mi> <mrow> <mi>a</mi> <mi>b</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>-</mo> <mn>2</mn> <msub> <mi>f</mi> <mi>&epsiv;</mi> </msub> </mrow> <mo>|</mo> </mrow> <msub> <mi>f</mi> <mi>&epsiv;</mi> </msub> </mfrac> <mo>,</mo> </mrow> </mtd> <mtd> <mrow> <msub> <mi>f</mi> <mi>&epsiv;</mi> </msub> <mo>&le;</mo> <msub> <mi>&Delta;f</mi> <mrow> <mi>a</mi> <mi>b</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>&le;</mo> <mn>2</mn> <msub> <mi>f</mi> <mi>&epsiv;</mi> </msub> </mrow> </mtd> </mtr> <mtr> <mtd> <mrow> <mn>0</mn> <mo>,</mo> </mrow> </mtd> <mtd> <mrow> <msub> <mi>&Delta;f</mi> <mrow> <mi>a</mi> <mi>b</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>&GreaterEqual;</mo> <mn>2</mn> <msub> <mi>f</mi> <mi>&epsiv;</mi> </msub> </mrow> </mtd> </mtr> </mtable> </mfenced> </mrow>Wherein fεIt is the measurement tolerance of sensor, selects the measurement accuracy for 4 times;Similarly obtain the pulsewidth support m of two measured valuespw:<mrow> <msub> <mi>m</mi> <mrow> <mi>p</mi> <mi>w</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mfenced open = "{" close = ""> <mtable> <mtr> <mtd> <mrow> <mn>1</mn> <mo>,</mo> </mrow> </mtd> <mtd> <mrow> <msub> <mi>&Delta;pw</mi> <mrow> <mi>a</mi> <mi>b</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>&le;</mo> <msub> <mi>pw</mi> <mi>&epsiv;</mi> </msub> </mrow> </mtd> </mtr> <mtr> <mtd> <mrow> <mfrac> <mrow> <mo>|</mo> <mrow> <msub> <mi>&Delta;pw</mi> <mrow> <mi>a</mi> <mi>b</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>-</mo> <mn>2</mn> <msub> <mi>pw</mi> <mi>&epsiv;</mi> </msub> </mrow> <mo>|</mo> </mrow> <mrow> <msub> <mi>pw</mi> <mi>&epsiv;</mi> </msub> </mrow> </mfrac> <mo>,</mo> </mrow> </mtd> <mtd> <mrow> <msub> <mi>pw</mi> <mi>&epsiv;</mi> </msub> <mo>&le;</mo> <msub> <mi>&Delta;pw</mi> <mrow> <mi>a</mi> <mi>b</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>&le;</mo> <mn>2</mn> <msub> <mi>pw</mi> <mi>&epsiv;</mi> </msub> </mrow> </mtd> </mtr> <mtr> <mtd> <mrow> <mn>0</mn> <mo>,</mo> </mrow> </mtd> <mtd> <mrow> <msub> <mi>&Delta;pw</mi> <mrow> <mi>a</mi> <mi>b</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>&GreaterEqual;</mo> <mn>2</mn> <msub> <mi>pw</mi> <mi>&epsiv;</mi> </msub> </mrow> </mtd> </mtr> </mtable> </mfenced> <mo>.</mo> </mrow>
- A kind of 4. method being applied to information fusion in radar signal sorting according to claim 1, it is characterised in that Step (3) is specially in described data level PDW fusions:D-S evidence theory represents interested proposition collection with identification framework U, defines the basic probability assignment function m on U:2U→ [0,1], meet:<mfenced open = "{" close = ""> <mtable> <mtr> <mtd> <mrow> <mi>m</mi> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mi>&phi;</mi> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0</mn> </mrow> </mtd> </mtr> <mtr> <mtd> <mrow> <munder> <mo>&Sigma;</mo> <mrow> <mi>A</mi> <mo>&Subset;</mo> <mi>U</mi> </mrow> </munder> <mi>m</mi> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mi>A</mi> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </mtd> </mtr> </mtable> </mfenced>M () is referred to as the Basic Probability As-signment on U, if m (A) ≠ 0, A is referred to as a burnt member, m (A) reacts the confidence level to A Size;For there is the inference system of two features, the probability assignment of two features is respectively m1、m2, for subset A, ask its combination Overall Basic Probability As-signment under latter two feature collective effectD-S rule:<mrow> <mi>m</mi> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mi>A</mi> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> <mo>=</mo> <mfrac> <mrow> <munder> <mo>&Sigma;</mo> <mrow> <msub> <mi>A</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> <mo>&cap;</mo> <msub> <mi>A</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mi>A</mi> </mrow> </munder> <msub> <mi>m</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <msub> <mi>A</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> <msub> <mi>m</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <msub> <mi>A</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>1</mn> <mo>-</mo> <mi>K</mi> </mrow> </mfrac> </mrow>WhereinFor conflict item, if K ≠ 1, it is determined that m Basic Probability As-signment;If K=1, then it is assumed that m1With m2Contradiction, it is not necessary to combine.
- A kind of 5. method being applied to information fusion in radar signal sorting according to claim 1, it is characterised in that Step (4) is specially in described data level PDW fusions:If signal comes from same radiation source, its arithmetic average is calculated as the carrier frequency of this moment pulse, pulsewidth after fusion Value, for not being the pulse reached simultaneously, we sort it according to the first later of arrival time, obtain more comprehensively believing Breath;Wherein,For the situation of pulse advance, the smaller value of arrival time value two arrival times for known to after definition fusion, pulsewidth It is worth for the larger pulse back edge of numerical value and the difference of the arrival time newly defined;Situation about being included for pulse, pulse arrival time and pwm value after definition fusion, which are all that the pulse included is corresponding, joins Number;If without above-mentioned phenomenon, arranged by arrival time order.
- 6. according to claim 1, a kind of method being applied to information fusion in radar signal sorting described in 3, its feature exists In the fusion of described feature level separation results is specially:Calculate the carrier frequency f supports m of radarfWith pulsewidth support mpw;PRI points are fixed and irregular two types:A. separation results are the normal radar that PRI is fixed:One separation results of one group of observation period are Ta, a separation results of another group of observation period are Tb, then this two The difference of individual separation results is Δ Tab=| Ta-Tb|, the PRI supports m of two separation resultsPRIFor:<mrow> <msub> <mi>m</mi> <mrow> <mi>P</mi> <mi>R</mi> <mi>I</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mfenced open = "{" close = ""> <mtable> <mtr> <mtd> <mrow> <mn>1</mn> <mo>,</mo> </mrow> </mtd> <mtd> <mrow> <msub> <mi>&Delta;T</mi> <mrow> <mi>a</mi> <mi>b</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo><</mo> <msub> <mi>T</mi> <mi>&epsiv;</mi> </msub> </mrow> </mtd> </mtr> <mtr> <mtd> <mrow> <mfrac> <mrow> <mo>|</mo> <mrow> <msub> <mi>&Delta;T</mi> <mrow> <mi>a</mi> <mi>b</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>-</mo> <mn>2</mn> <msub> <mi>T</mi> <mi>&epsiv;</mi> </msub> </mrow> <mo>|</mo> </mrow> <msub> <mi>T</mi> <mi>&epsiv;</mi> </msub> </mfrac> <mo>,</mo> </mrow> </mtd> <mtd> <mrow> <msub> <mi>T</mi> <mi>&epsiv;</mi> </msub> <mo><</mo> <msub> <mi>&Delta;T</mi> <mrow> <mi>a</mi> <mi>b</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo><</mo> <mn>2</mn> <msub> <mi>T</mi> <mi>&epsiv;</mi> </msub> </mrow> </mtd> </mtr> <mtr> <mtd> <mrow> <mn>0</mn> <mo>,</mo> </mrow> </mtd> <mtd> <mrow> <msub> <mi>&Delta;T</mi> <mrow> <mi>a</mi> <mi>b</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>></mo> <mn>2</mn> <msub> <mi>T</mi> <mi>&epsiv;</mi> </msub> </mrow> </mtd> </mtr> </mtable> </mfenced> </mrow>TεFor the repetition period error of reconnaissance system;B. separation results are staggered PRI radar:So that two is irregular as an example, the skeleton cycle of one group of observed result is Ta, two irregular recurrence intervals are Ta1And Ta2, another component choosing As a result skeleton cycle T is shownb, two irregular recurrence intervals are Tb1And Tb2;The now PRI supports m of separation resultsPRIFor:<mrow> <msub> <mi>m</mi> <mrow> <mi>P</mi> <mi>R</mi> <mi>I</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mfenced open = "{" close = ""> <mtable> <mtr> <mtd> <mrow> <mn>1</mn> <mo>,</mo> </mrow> </mtd> <mtd> <mrow> <mi>&Delta;</mi> <mi>T</mi> <mo>&le;</mo> <msub> <mi>T</mi> <mi>&epsiv;</mi> </msub> <msub> <mi>or&Delta;T</mi> <mrow> <mi>a</mi> <mi>b</mi> <mi>i</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>&le;</mo> <msub> <mi>T</mi> <mi>&epsiv;</mi> </msub> </mrow> </mtd> </mtr> <mtr> <mtd> <mrow> <mfrac> <mrow> <mo>|</mo> <mrow> <msub> <mi>&Delta;T</mi> <mrow> <mi>a</mi> <mi>b</mi> <mi>i</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>-</mo> <mn>2</mn> <msub> <mi>T</mi> <mi>&epsiv;</mi> </msub> </mrow> <mo>|</mo> </mrow> <msub> <mi>T</mi> <mi>&epsiv;</mi> </msub> </mfrac> <mo>,</mo> </mrow> </mtd> <mtd> <mrow> <msub> <mi>T</mi> <mi>&epsiv;</mi> </msub> <mo><</mo> <msub> <mi>&Delta;T</mi> <mrow> <mi>a</mi> <mi>b</mi> <mi>i</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>&le;</mo> <mn>2</mn> <msub> <mi>T</mi> <mi>&epsiv;</mi> </msub> </mrow> </mtd> </mtr> <mtr> <mtd> <mrow> <mfrac> <mrow> <mo>|</mo> <mrow> <mi>&Delta;</mi> <mi>T</mi> <mo>-</mo> <mn>2</mn> <msub> <mi>T</mi> <mi>&epsiv;</mi> </msub> </mrow> <mo>|</mo> </mrow> <msub> <mi>T</mi> <mi>&epsiv;</mi> </msub> </mfrac> <mo>,</mo> </mrow> </mtd> <mtd> <mrow> <msub> <mi>T</mi> <mi>&epsiv;</mi> </msub> <mo><</mo> <mi>&Delta;</mi> <mi>T</mi> <mo>&le;</mo> <mn>2</mn> <msub> <mi>T</mi> <mi>&epsiv;</mi> </msub> <mo>,</mo> <msub> <mi>&Delta;T</mi> <mrow> <mi>a</mi> <mi>b</mi> <mi>i</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>></mo> <mn>2</mn> <msub> <mi>T</mi> <mi>&epsiv;</mi> </msub> </mrow> </mtd> </mtr> <mtr> <mtd> <mrow> <mn>0</mn> <mo>,</mo> </mrow> </mtd> <mtd> <mrow> <mi>&Delta;</mi> <mi>T</mi> <mo>></mo> <mn>2</mn> <msub> <mi>T</mi> <mi>&epsiv;</mi> </msub> </mrow> </mtd> </mtr> </mtable> </mfenced> </mrow>Wherein, PRI difference DELTA T=| Ta-Tb|, Δ Tabi=| Tai-Tbi|, i=1,2;Probability assignment function formula under n evidence collective effect is:<mrow> <mi>m</mi> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mi>A</mi> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> <mo>=</mo> <mfenced open = "{" close = ""> <mtable> <mtr> <mtd> <mrow> <mn>0</mn> <mo>,</mo> </mrow> </mtd> </mtr> <mtr> <mtd> <mfrac> <mrow> <munder> <mo>&Sigma;</mo> <mrow> <mo>&cap;</mo> <msub> <mi>A</mi> <mi>i</mi> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mi>A</mi> </mrow> </munder> <munderover> <mo>&Pi;</mo> <mrow> <mi>i</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> <mi>n</mi> </munderover> <msub> <mi>m</mi> <mi>i</mi> </msub> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <msub> <mi>A</mi> <mi>i</mi> </msub> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>1</mn> <mo>-</mo> <munder> <mo>&Sigma;</mo> <mrow> <mo>&cap;</mo> <msub> <mi>A</mi> <mi>i</mi> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mi>&phi;</mi> </mrow> </munder> <munderover> <mo>&Pi;</mo> <mrow> <mi>i</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> <mi>n</mi> </munderover> <msub> <mi>m</mi> <mi>i</mi> </msub> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <msub> <mi>A</mi> <mi>i</mi> </msub> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </mfrac> </mtd> </mtr> </mtable> </mfenced> <mo>,</mo> <mo>&ForAll;</mo> <mi>A</mi> <mo>&Subset;</mo> <mi>U</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>A</mi> <mo>&NotEqual;</mo> <mi>&phi;</mi> </mrow>If overall support is more than the threshold value of setting, two separation results for judging to be compared describe same portion's thunder Reach, feature-based fusion is taken turns doing to the result obtained after all detecting data sortings in observation time, if description is all same Portion's radar, then using the PRI variances inverse of separation results as weight coefficient, realize the unification to same portion's radar signature parameter;In order to avoid due to sorting mistake caused by deinterleaving algorithm, the PRI parameters of such as sorting display are actual PRI multiple, I During realizing that parameter is unified, also need statistics to describe the umber of pulse and frequency number of this radar, separation results occur Frequency it is high and the umber of pulse that uses is more, it is believed that this separation results is with a high credibility, passes through the umber of pulse to describing different radars Sort method is carried out, can intuitively obtain the radiation source information in observation period.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201710722269.4A CN107656245B (en) | 2017-08-22 | 2017-08-22 | Method for applying information fusion to radar signal sorting |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201710722269.4A CN107656245B (en) | 2017-08-22 | 2017-08-22 | Method for applying information fusion to radar signal sorting |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN107656245A true CN107656245A (en) | 2018-02-02 |
CN107656245B CN107656245B (en) | 2020-12-04 |
Family
ID=61128457
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN201710722269.4A Active CN107656245B (en) | 2017-08-22 | 2017-08-22 | Method for applying information fusion to radar signal sorting |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN107656245B (en) |
Cited By (23)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN108562875A (en) * | 2018-04-24 | 2018-09-21 | 扬州健行电子科技有限公司 | A kind of method for separating of prior data bank matching method to radar signal |
CN109270497A (en) * | 2018-10-28 | 2019-01-25 | 西南电子技术研究所(中国电子科技集团公司第十研究所) | The multi-Dimensional parameters Pre-sorting method of radar pulse signal |
CN109683143A (en) * | 2019-03-07 | 2019-04-26 | 西安电子科技大学 | Radar Signal Sorting Method, device, computer equipment and can storage medium |
CN109709555A (en) * | 2018-12-13 | 2019-05-03 | 中国气象局气象探测中心 | A kind of identification weather radar adjacent body sweeps the method and system of data variance |
CN110687511A (en) * | 2019-11-14 | 2020-01-14 | 扬州船用电子仪器研究所(中国船舶重工集团公司第七二三研究所) | Pulse timing sequence recovery method of radar signal simulator |
CN110809005A (en) * | 2019-11-14 | 2020-02-18 | 扬州船用电子仪器研究所(中国船舶重工集团公司第七二三研究所) | Unified characterization method for radar pulse description words |
CN110880012A (en) * | 2019-09-29 | 2020-03-13 | 扬州船用电子仪器研究所(中国船舶重工集团公司第七二三研究所) | Correlation method for frequency information of agile radar radiation source between multiple scout platforms |
CN110907908A (en) * | 2019-10-22 | 2020-03-24 | 扬州船用电子仪器研究所(中国船舶重工集团公司第七二三研究所) | Navigation radar signal sorting method based on envelope analysis |
CN110927679A (en) * | 2019-11-14 | 2020-03-27 | 扬州船用电子仪器研究所(中国船舶重工集团公司第七二三研究所) | Method for sequencing multiple radar signals based on hash table |
CN111090077A (en) * | 2020-01-20 | 2020-05-01 | 上海交通大学 | Method for sorting TOA differential statistical radar signals after multi-dimensional de-interleaving |
CN111447019A (en) * | 2020-03-05 | 2020-07-24 | 中国电子科技集团公司第二十九研究所 | Device for fusing pulse signals among multiple modules |
CN111487584A (en) * | 2020-04-20 | 2020-08-04 | 中国航天科工集团八五一一研究所 | Pulse screening method based on time slice |
CN111563532A (en) * | 2020-04-07 | 2020-08-21 | 西北工业大学 | Unknown target identification method based on attribute weight fusion |
CN111751792A (en) * | 2020-06-15 | 2020-10-09 | 哈尔滨工程大学 | Passive radar signal sorting PDW preprocessing method |
CN112034426A (en) * | 2020-08-27 | 2020-12-04 | 上海朱光亚战略科技研究院 | Radar signal processing method, apparatus, computer device, and storage medium |
CN112231116A (en) * | 2020-10-12 | 2021-01-15 | 航天科工广信智能技术有限公司 | Object fusion method of microwave radar and application system thereof |
CN112597820A (en) * | 2020-12-10 | 2021-04-02 | 南京长峰航天电子科技有限公司 | Target clustering method based on radar signal sorting |
CN112986928A (en) * | 2021-03-11 | 2021-06-18 | 哈尔滨工程大学 | Signal sorting multi-source fusion processing method in complex electromagnetic environment |
CN113075637A (en) * | 2021-04-29 | 2021-07-06 | 中国船舶重工集团公司第七二三研究所 | Airborne PD radar signal sorting method based on pulse descriptor data compression |
CN113311394A (en) * | 2021-05-18 | 2021-08-27 | 中国船舶重工集团公司第七二三研究所 | Ultra-wideband PDW real-time fusion method |
CN113625242A (en) * | 2021-07-23 | 2021-11-09 | 哈尔滨工程大学 | Radar signal sorting method based on potential distance graph combined PCA and improved cloud model |
CN115047417A (en) * | 2022-08-15 | 2022-09-13 | 成都锐新科技有限公司 | Method and system for simulating radar echo and interference |
CN117347961A (en) * | 2023-12-04 | 2024-01-05 | 中国电子科技集团公司第二十九研究所 | Radar function attribute identification method based on Bayesian learning |
Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN101697006A (en) * | 2009-09-18 | 2010-04-21 | 北京航空航天大学 | Target identification method based on data fusion of airborne radar and infrared imaging sensor |
CN101893704A (en) * | 2010-07-20 | 2010-11-24 | 哈尔滨工业大学 | Rough set-based radar radiation source signal identification method |
CN105046067A (en) * | 2015-07-03 | 2015-11-11 | 西北工业大学 | Multi-sensor information fusion method based on evidence similarity |
EP3083364A1 (en) * | 2013-12-20 | 2016-10-26 | Thales Canada Inc. | Wayside guideway vehicle detection and switch deadlocking system with a multimodal guideway vehicle sensor |
CN106093873A (en) * | 2016-06-04 | 2016-11-09 | 陈昌孝 | A kind of radar emitter signal recognition methods based on multisensor |
CN106778907A (en) * | 2017-01-11 | 2017-05-31 | 张军 | A kind of intelligent travelling crane early warning system based on multi-sensor information fusion |
-
2017
- 2017-08-22 CN CN201710722269.4A patent/CN107656245B/en active Active
Patent Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN101697006A (en) * | 2009-09-18 | 2010-04-21 | 北京航空航天大学 | Target identification method based on data fusion of airborne radar and infrared imaging sensor |
CN101893704A (en) * | 2010-07-20 | 2010-11-24 | 哈尔滨工业大学 | Rough set-based radar radiation source signal identification method |
EP3083364A1 (en) * | 2013-12-20 | 2016-10-26 | Thales Canada Inc. | Wayside guideway vehicle detection and switch deadlocking system with a multimodal guideway vehicle sensor |
CN105046067A (en) * | 2015-07-03 | 2015-11-11 | 西北工业大学 | Multi-sensor information fusion method based on evidence similarity |
CN106093873A (en) * | 2016-06-04 | 2016-11-09 | 陈昌孝 | A kind of radar emitter signal recognition methods based on multisensor |
CN106778907A (en) * | 2017-01-11 | 2017-05-31 | 张军 | A kind of intelligent travelling crane early warning system based on multi-sensor information fusion |
Non-Patent Citations (3)
Title |
---|
YI CHEN: "Improvement of Fusion Algorithm Based on Evidence Theory", 《2008 SECOND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GENETIC AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTING》 * |
沈阳: "雷达辐射源识别的多元信息融合算法研究", 《电子与信息学报》 * |
韩增奇: "信息融合技术综述", 《情报杂志》 * |
Cited By (36)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN108562875A (en) * | 2018-04-24 | 2018-09-21 | 扬州健行电子科技有限公司 | A kind of method for separating of prior data bank matching method to radar signal |
CN109270497A (en) * | 2018-10-28 | 2019-01-25 | 西南电子技术研究所(中国电子科技集团公司第十研究所) | The multi-Dimensional parameters Pre-sorting method of radar pulse signal |
CN109709555B (en) * | 2018-12-13 | 2020-09-11 | 中国气象局气象探测中心 | Method and system for identifying difference of adjacent scan data of weather radar |
CN109709555A (en) * | 2018-12-13 | 2019-05-03 | 中国气象局气象探测中心 | A kind of identification weather radar adjacent body sweeps the method and system of data variance |
CN109683143A (en) * | 2019-03-07 | 2019-04-26 | 西安电子科技大学 | Radar Signal Sorting Method, device, computer equipment and can storage medium |
CN110880012A (en) * | 2019-09-29 | 2020-03-13 | 扬州船用电子仪器研究所(中国船舶重工集团公司第七二三研究所) | Correlation method for frequency information of agile radar radiation source between multiple scout platforms |
CN110880012B (en) * | 2019-09-29 | 2023-09-05 | 扬州船用电子仪器研究所(中国船舶重工集团公司第七二三研究所) | Inter-pulse agile radar radiation source frequency information correlation method for multi-reconnaissance platform |
CN110907908A (en) * | 2019-10-22 | 2020-03-24 | 扬州船用电子仪器研究所(中国船舶重工集团公司第七二三研究所) | Navigation radar signal sorting method based on envelope analysis |
CN110809005A (en) * | 2019-11-14 | 2020-02-18 | 扬州船用电子仪器研究所(中国船舶重工集团公司第七二三研究所) | Unified characterization method for radar pulse description words |
CN110927679A (en) * | 2019-11-14 | 2020-03-27 | 扬州船用电子仪器研究所(中国船舶重工集团公司第七二三研究所) | Method for sequencing multiple radar signals based on hash table |
CN110687511A (en) * | 2019-11-14 | 2020-01-14 | 扬州船用电子仪器研究所(中国船舶重工集团公司第七二三研究所) | Pulse timing sequence recovery method of radar signal simulator |
CN110687511B (en) * | 2019-11-14 | 2023-01-03 | 扬州船用电子仪器研究所(中国船舶重工集团公司第七二三研究所) | Pulse timing sequence recovery method of radar signal simulator |
CN110809005B (en) * | 2019-11-14 | 2022-05-20 | 扬州船用电子仪器研究所(中国船舶重工集团公司第七二三研究所) | Unified characterization method for radar pulse description words |
CN111090077A (en) * | 2020-01-20 | 2020-05-01 | 上海交通大学 | Method for sorting TOA differential statistical radar signals after multi-dimensional de-interleaving |
CN111090077B (en) * | 2020-01-20 | 2023-01-20 | 上海交通大学 | Method for sorting TOA differential statistical radar signals after multi-dimensional de-interleaving |
CN111447019B (en) * | 2020-03-05 | 2021-12-31 | 中国电子科技集团公司第二十九研究所 | Device for fusing pulse signals among multiple modules |
CN111447019A (en) * | 2020-03-05 | 2020-07-24 | 中国电子科技集团公司第二十九研究所 | Device for fusing pulse signals among multiple modules |
CN111563532A (en) * | 2020-04-07 | 2020-08-21 | 西北工业大学 | Unknown target identification method based on attribute weight fusion |
CN111563532B (en) * | 2020-04-07 | 2022-03-15 | 西北工业大学 | Unknown target identification method based on attribute weight fusion |
CN111487584A (en) * | 2020-04-20 | 2020-08-04 | 中国航天科工集团八五一一研究所 | Pulse screening method based on time slice |
CN111751792B (en) * | 2020-06-15 | 2024-03-22 | 哈尔滨工程大学 | PDW preprocessing method for passive radar signal sorting |
CN111751792A (en) * | 2020-06-15 | 2020-10-09 | 哈尔滨工程大学 | Passive radar signal sorting PDW preprocessing method |
CN112034426B (en) * | 2020-08-27 | 2024-04-12 | 上海朱光亚战略科技研究院 | Radar signal processing method, device, computer equipment and storage medium |
CN112034426A (en) * | 2020-08-27 | 2020-12-04 | 上海朱光亚战略科技研究院 | Radar signal processing method, apparatus, computer device, and storage medium |
CN112231116A (en) * | 2020-10-12 | 2021-01-15 | 航天科工广信智能技术有限公司 | Object fusion method of microwave radar and application system thereof |
CN112597820A (en) * | 2020-12-10 | 2021-04-02 | 南京长峰航天电子科技有限公司 | Target clustering method based on radar signal sorting |
CN112986928A (en) * | 2021-03-11 | 2021-06-18 | 哈尔滨工程大学 | Signal sorting multi-source fusion processing method in complex electromagnetic environment |
CN113075637B (en) * | 2021-04-29 | 2022-06-07 | 中国船舶重工集团公司第七二三研究所 | Airborne PD radar signal sorting method based on pulse descriptor data compression |
CN113075637A (en) * | 2021-04-29 | 2021-07-06 | 中国船舶重工集团公司第七二三研究所 | Airborne PD radar signal sorting method based on pulse descriptor data compression |
CN113311394A (en) * | 2021-05-18 | 2021-08-27 | 中国船舶重工集团公司第七二三研究所 | Ultra-wideband PDW real-time fusion method |
CN113625242A (en) * | 2021-07-23 | 2021-11-09 | 哈尔滨工程大学 | Radar signal sorting method based on potential distance graph combined PCA and improved cloud model |
CN113625242B (en) * | 2021-07-23 | 2023-09-29 | 哈尔滨工程大学 | Radar signal sorting method based on potential distance graph combined PCA and improved cloud model |
CN115047417B (en) * | 2022-08-15 | 2022-10-25 | 成都锐新科技有限公司 | Method and system for simulating radar echo and interference |
CN115047417A (en) * | 2022-08-15 | 2022-09-13 | 成都锐新科技有限公司 | Method and system for simulating radar echo and interference |
CN117347961A (en) * | 2023-12-04 | 2024-01-05 | 中国电子科技集团公司第二十九研究所 | Radar function attribute identification method based on Bayesian learning |
CN117347961B (en) * | 2023-12-04 | 2024-02-13 | 中国电子科技集团公司第二十九研究所 | Radar function attribute identification method based on Bayesian learning |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN107656245B (en) | 2020-12-04 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN107656245A (en) | A kind of method being applied to information fusion in radar signal sorting | |
CN105277923B (en) | A kind of single channel Radar Signal Sorting Method | |
Huang et al. | Machine-learning-based data processing techniques for vehicle-to-vehicle channel modeling | |
CN107358250B (en) | Body gait recognition methods and system based on the fusion of two waveband radar micro-doppler | |
CN104991232B (en) | Signal-level fusion networking radar anti-cheating interference method under object signal correlation | |
CN104931960B (en) | Trend message and radar target situation information full flight path segment data correlating method | |
CN106680806A (en) | Multi-radar plot fusion method | |
CN109581312A (en) | A kind of high-resolution millimetre-wave radar multi-object clustering method | |
CN109188423A (en) | A kind of distributed multiple target tracking method based on multi-source cluster | |
CN107765228B (en) | A kind of online radar target detection method based on region similitude | |
CN109002835A (en) | A kind of particle filter data correlation method based on maximum entropy fuzzy clustering | |
CN107015249A (en) | ADS B Deceiving interference detection methods based on space correlation uniformity | |
CN105259541A (en) | Method of confronting active deception jamming by multi-station radar | |
CN104991233B (en) | The anti-Deceiving interference method of radar network based on signal level fusion | |
WO2012154495A2 (en) | Method, system and program product for deinterleaving and classifying arbitrary radar pulse patterns using non-determinstic finite state automata | |
CN106093873A (en) | A kind of radar emitter signal recognition methods based on multisensor | |
CN104714225A (en) | Dynamic programming tracking-before-detection method based on generalized likelihood ratios | |
CN113759323B (en) | Signal sorting method and device based on improved K-Means joint convolution self-encoder | |
CN104680002B (en) | A kind of distributed fusion method theoretical based on random set | |
CN107346020A (en) | A kind of distribution for asynchronous multi-static radar system batch estimation fusion method | |
CN109932720A (en) | Motion estimate method and device based on radar | |
CN110475246A (en) | Malice anchor node detection method based on isolated forest and sequential probability ratio test | |
CN105259540B (en) | A kind of optimization method of multistation radar anti-active cheating formula interference | |
CN108983165A (en) | The anti-Deceiving interference method of netted radar system based on substation selection | |
Nuhoglu et al. | Image segmentation for radar signal deinterleaving using deep learning |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PB01 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
GR01 | Patent grant |