CN107645335A - MPPM FSO systems based on EW composite channel models demodulate error sign ratio computational methods firmly - Google Patents
MPPM FSO systems based on EW composite channel models demodulate error sign ratio computational methods firmly Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN107645335A CN107645335A CN201710814265.9A CN201710814265A CN107645335A CN 107645335 A CN107645335 A CN 107645335A CN 201710814265 A CN201710814265 A CN 201710814265A CN 107645335 A CN107645335 A CN 107645335A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- mrow
- mfrac
- msup
- msub
- gamma
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 239000002131 composite material Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 24
- 238000000205 computational method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 7
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 34
- 150000001875 compounds Chemical class 0.000 claims abstract description 22
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 17
- 230000001186 cumulative effect Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 7
- 238000005562 fading Methods 0.000 claims description 7
- 108010076504 Protein Sorting Signals Proteins 0.000 claims description 6
- 239000000654 additive Substances 0.000 claims description 4
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 claims description 4
- 206010000234 Abortion spontaneous Diseases 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000013178 mathematical model Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 208000015994 miscarriage Diseases 0.000 claims description 3
- 208000000995 spontaneous abortion Diseases 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000000996 additive effect Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000010354 integration Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000004043 responsiveness Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000009466 transformation Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000009897 systematic effect Effects 0.000 abstract description 3
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 description 23
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 10
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 9
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000001869 rapid Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000012935 Averaging Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000004744 fabric Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000011435 rock Substances 0.000 description 2
- 241001637516 Polygonia c-album Species 0.000 description 1
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000011148 porous material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 1
Landscapes
- Other Investigation Or Analysis Of Materials By Electrical Means (AREA)
- Medicines Containing Antibodies Or Antigens For Use As Internal Diagnostic Agents (AREA)
- Optical Communication System (AREA)
Abstract
The invention discloses a kind of MPPM FSO systems based on EW composite channel models to demodulate error sign ratio computational methods firmly, including:1) it is distributed based on EW, it is contemplated that the influence of point tolerance, establish point-to-point FSO composite channel model;2) threshold value of optimal judgement thresholding and dynamic decision thresholding is determined according to the cumulative distribution model and probability Distribution Model of EW turbulent flows and point tolerance composite channel model;3) probability of mistaken verdict of each time slot under by EW turbulent flows and point tolerance compound channel disturbed condition is calculated;4) Gauss Laguerre polynomials are utilized, obtain the closure expression formula of error sign ratio.Composite channel model in the inventive method considers influence of the point tolerance to systematic function compared to single atmospheric turbulance model, and this method complexity is low, is better than other hard demodulating algorithms in error sign ratio systematic function, more tallies with the actual situation.
Description
Technical field
Index Weibull distribution, which is based on, the present invention relates to (N, M) the MPPM modulation systems in radio optical communication system is considering point
Computational methods are demodulated using optimal judgement thresholding and dynamic decision thresholding firmly in the case of error influence, belong to wireless light communication
Technical field.
Background technology
Wireless light communication, and often referred to as FSO (Free space optical
Communication), i.e. FSO communicates.FSO communications are using light wave as carrier, and communication is transmitted in free space transmission medium
A kind of new broadband wireless communications means of information, it has, and cost is cheap, sets up flexibly convenient, anti-electromagnetic interference capability
By force, good confidentiality, without frequency resource license, bandwidth the advantages that, receive everybody extensive concern.Although wireless light communication
There is its unique advantage, but it also receives the influence and restriction of factors.In FSO systems, light beam using air as
Transmission medium, and atmospheric environment is complicated and changeable, communication link can undoubtedly be disturbed by atmosphere.Up to the present, great Liang Yan
Study carefully and show that atmospheric turbulance is one of main factor for influenceing communication performance, the effect can cause signal that amplitude occurs in receiving terminal
With the randomized jitter of phase, and then cause obvious light intensity scintillation effect, greatly reduce communication system performance.FSO communication systems
System also receives the restriction of other non-atmospheric factors except this principal element is influenceed by atmospheric turbulance.Point tolerance is another
The principal element of one restriction communication quality, it is caused by the randomized jitter factor such as change of thermal expansion, slight earthquake, wind speed
Transmitting terminal and caused by receiving terminal fixed platform rocks at random.And light beam is all narrower used by radio optical communication system,
Random rock that hair receives both ends platform can cause the non-aligned of light beam, so as to get and random decay occurs for the optical signal up to receiving terminal,
And then it have impact on communication link performance.In order to preferably study the influence that air declines to FSO systems, scientific research personnel successively proposes
Different atmospheric channel models, such as logarithm normal distribution (log-normal, LN) model (being applied to weak rapid situation), K points
Cloth model (be suitable to strong rapid condition), and double gammas (Gamma-Gamma, GG) distributed model (be applied to by force, weak three rapid feelings
Condition).Wherein, GG models are of great interest and study, and the mathematical form of GG distributed models is easily handled, and is being used
During the receiver of small-bore, notional result can coincide with the emulation under three kinds of turbulent flow conditions of weak, medium, strong with experimental data well.
But when considering aperture averaging effect, in GG distributed models in the case of strong rapid result and experimental data it is identical be not
Very well.2012, R.Barrios and F.Dios were based on Weibull distribution model, the relevant nature transmitted with reference to laser in turbulent flow
With the physical significance of aperture averaging, it is proposed that index weber (exponentiated Weibull, EW) model.By and it is different
Pore size is contrasted from the emulation under different turbulence intensities and experimental data, show the model can any aperture and appoint
The random fluctuation situation of light intensity in receiver plane is described in the case of turbulent flow of anticipating.
Current digital optical communication system be mostly intensity modulated/directly detection (IM/DD) system, conventional modulation system
There are on-off keying (on-off keying, OOK) and pulse position modulation (pulse position modulation, PPM).And
New multi-pulse position modulation (Multipulse Pulse Position Modulation, MPPM) mode, relative to OOK
With bandwidth availability ratio and power efficiency can be improved for PPM.
Hard demodulation is a kind of conventional demodulation method in free-space optical communication system, and it is made an uproar by decision threshold handle
Sound and the signal determining of influence of fading are corresponding modulation level.And fixed sentence thresholding is wherein most simple and easy to get, but hold
It is also easy to produce error thresholds.And optimal judgement thresholding and dynamic decision thresholding can eliminate this error thresholds, the standard of judgement is improved
Exactness, so as to lifting system performance.
At present the problem of, is:Due to MPPM complexity, the report on its hard demodulation characteristics is less.It is currently known hard
Demodulating system algorithm is the effect for only considering atmospheric turbulance mostly, without the influence of consideration point tolerance.It is thus impossible to for referring to
Lead actual FSO communication system receivers design.It is contemplated that to the compound action of point tolerance and EW distribution atmospheric turbulances, it is based on
MPPM modulation carries out hard demodulation judgement using optimal judgement thresholding and dynamic decision thresholding, calculates the erratum of radio optical communication system
Number rate performance current highly important research direction of category in fact.
The content of the invention
The compound action of consideration point tolerance and EW distribution atmospheric turbulances, using optimal judgement thresholding and is moved based on MPPM modulation
State decision threshold carries out hard demodulation judgement, calculates the error sign ratio performance of radio optical communication system category is current in fact and highly important grind
Study carefully direction.Wherein, optimal judgement thresholding and the hard demodulating algorithm of dynamic decision thresholding can eliminate error thresholds, and raising system is sentenced
Accuracy certainly.A kind of mathematical modeling of the error sign ratio performance estimation method proposed, the hard demodulation to above-mentioned (N, M) MPPM are calculated
Method error sign ratio carries out theory analysis, and then correctly effectively calculates theoretical error sign ratio.
The present invention is realized by following technical proposals.
MPPM-FSO systems of the invention based on EW composite channel models demodulate error sign ratio computational methods firmly, including following
Step:
1) it is distributed based on index weber EW, it is contemplated that the influence of point tolerance, establish point-to-point FSO and answer
Close channel model;
2) according to index weber EW turbulent flows and the cumulative distribution model F of the composite model of point tolerancehAnd probability distribution mould (h)
Type fh(h) threshold value of optimal judgement thresholding and dynamic decision thresholding is determined;
3) mistake of each time slot under by index weber EW turbulent flows and point tolerance compound channel disturbed condition is calculated to sentence
Probability certainly;
4) Gauss Laguerre polynomials are utilized, obtain the closure expression formula of error sign ratio.
Further, in step 1), based on index weber EW be distributed, it is contemplated that the influence of point tolerance, establish it is point-to-point from
By space optical communication composite channel model:If for x to send signal sequence, y is reception signal sequence, then obtains the mathematical modulo of channel
Type, the probability Distribution Model of index Weibull distribution model is built according to obtained mathematical modelingWith the probability point of point tolerance
Cloth modelIt then can obtain the cumulative distribution model F of the composite channel model of atmospheric turbulance and point toleranceh(h) it is and general
Rate distributed model fh(h)。
Further, in the step 2), the threshold settings of optimal judgement thresholding utilize Matlab by dichotomy under
Formula seeks unknown number ythObtain.
Further, the threshold value of dynamic decision thresholding is to detect the signal of each time slot, takes its signal leading edge
200ns, the value of setting dynamic decision thresholding is taken according to the signal intensity detected in this period.
Further, in the step 3), each time slot is by index weber EW turbulent flows and the interference of point tolerance compound channel
In the case of mistaken verdict, realized by following methods:
When 3a) using optimal judgement thresholding, it is known that the probability Distribution Model f of compound channelh(h) numeral and in step 1)
Model, then can calculate non-slot signal f (y | y0) and time slot signal f (y | y1) sample value probability density function, and then obtain
Non-slot signal f (y | y0) mistaken verdict probability, i.e. false-alarm probability PfWith time slot signal f (y | y1) mistaken verdict probability, i.e.,
False dismissal probability Pm;
When 3b) using dynamic decision thresholding, it is known that the probability that (N, M) MPPM block of informations empty slots occur is N-M/N, non-
The probability that empty slot occurs is M/N, then probability of miscarriage of justice of each time slot when existing for only white Gaussian noise;Known compound letter
Mathematical modeling in the probability Distribution Model and step 1) in road, then each time slot can be calculated under by compound channel disturbed condition
Mistaken verdict probability.
Further, in the step 4), the closure expression formula for obtaining error sign ratio specifically includes:
When 4a) using optimal judgement thresholding, for (N, M) MPPM, according to the probability P correctly demodulatedc=(1-Pm)M(1-
Pf)N-M, obtain error sign ratio;
When 4b) using dynamic decision thresholding, for (N, M) MPPM, the probability correctly demodulated is Pc=(1-SLER)N, obtain
Error sign ratio.
The present invention has advantages below:
A kind of MPPM-FSO systems based on EW composite channel models are first proposed in the present invention and demodulate error sign ratio firmly
Computational methods, this method complexity is low, is better than other hard demodulating algorithms in error sign ratio systematic function;
Composite channel model in the inventive method considers point tolerance to system compared to single atmospheric turbulance model
The influence of performance, more tallies with the actual situation.
Brief description of the drawings
Fig. 1 is MPPM modulation demodulation systems model under compound channel;
Fig. 2 is consideration point tolerance and the error sign ratio comparison diagram for not considering point tolerance in the case of strong rapid and weak two kinds of turbulent flow;
Fig. 3 is error sign ratio theoretical value comparison diagram when aperture diameter changes in the case of middle rapids;
Fig. 4 is error sign ratio theoretical value comparison diagram when shake variance changes under weak turbulent flow condition;
Fig. 5 is that optimal judgement threshold schemes, mistake when beam angle changes are used in the case of strong rapid and weak two kinds of turbulent flow
Symbol rate theoretical value comparison diagram;
Fig. 6 is that dynamic decision door scheme, erratum when beam angle changes are used in the case of strong rapid and weak two kinds of turbulent flow
Number rate theory value comparison diagram.
Embodiment
To make the object, technical solutions and advantages of the present invention clearer, enter with reference to the accompanying drawings and detailed description
One step describes in detail.The present embodiment only represents the schematic illustration to the present invention, does not represent any limitation of the invention.
Hard demodulation bit error rate computational methods of the present invention based on MPPM modulation using two kinds of decision thresholds, including:
Step 1 is distributed based on index weber EW, it is contemplated that the influence of point tolerance, establishes point-to-point FSO
Composite channel model
X 1a) is set to send signal sequence, y is reception signal sequence, then the mathematical modeling of channel is:
Y=Rhx+n
Wherein, n represent average be 0, variance beAdditive white Gaussian noise.R is photodetector responsiveness, and h is clothes
From the channel fading of index weber EW compound channels distribution, h=hahp;Wherein, haTo obey the channel fading of EW distributions, hpFor
Point tolerance loss factor.
1b) according to step 1a) probability Distribution Models of obtained mathematical modeling structure index weber EW distributed modelsWith the probability Distribution Model of point toleranceIt is expressed as
Wherein, haTo obey the channel fading of index weber EW distributions, hpFor point tolerance loss factor;β is form parameter, β
> 0, its value are related to scintillation index;α is in given observation space, collimates the light beam of propagation and the light beam quilt of non-aligned propagation
The average magnitude being properly received, α > 0;η scale parameters, η > 0;γ be equivalent beam angle and shake standard deviation ratio, γ=
wzeq/2σs;Wherein wzeqFor equivalent beam angle, σsTo shake standard deviation;A0For when the skew between detector and beam center
Measure for 0 when the light intensity that receives of receiver, A0=[erf (v)]2, wherein ν is the ratio of the beam angle at aperture and distance z,Wherein a be detector aperture radius, wzFor the beam angle at the z of range transmission end.
The cumulative distribution model F of index weber EW compound channels 1c) can be then derived according to the two formulash(h) it is and general
Rate distributed model fh(h) it is:
In formula, Γ (a, x) is upper gamma incomplete function,For Mayer G-function;J is the meter of summation symbol
Number device.
Step 2 is according to index weber EW turbulent flows and the cumulative distribution model F of the composite channel model of point toleranceh(h) it is and general
Rate distributed model fh(h) threshold value of optimal judgement thresholding and dynamic decision thresholding is determined
2a) threshold value of optimal judgement thresholding can seek unknown number y by dichotomy using Matlab to following formulathObtain
In formula, number of time slots that a block of information that N is modulated by MPPM includes, M is the pulse in this N number of number of time slots
Number;T is the integration variable of integrand;ythFor threshold value;μ is coefficient, and μ2=(RNPt/M)2, R is photoelectric transformation efficiency,
PtFor the average emitted power of transmitting terminal;G is signal to noise ratio;Exp () is the exponential function using natural number e the bottom of as;Γ () is
Gamma function;Erf () is error function;Erfc () is cosine error function;J is the counter of summation symbol.
2b) dynamic decision thresholding is the signal for detecting each time slot, the 200ns of its signal leading edge is taken, according to this period
The signal intensity inside detected takes the value of setting dynamic decision thresholding.By the detection being worth to forward position, then make decisions thresholding
Setting has been equivalently employed without the influence of turbulent flow, influences the only white Gaussian noise of conclusive judgement.
Step 3 calculates mistake of each time slot under by index weber EW turbulent flows and point tolerance compound channel disturbed condition
The probability of judgement
When 3a) using optimal judgement thresholding, it is known that the probability Distribution Model f of compound channelh(h) mathematics and in step 1)
Model, then can calculate by go out under index weber EW turbulent flows and point tolerance disturbed condition non-slot signal f (y | y0) believe with time slot
Number f (y | y1) probability density function of sample value is respectively:
In formula, σn 2For the variance of additive white Gaussian noise;f(y|y1) it is the probability density letter for having signal slot sample value
Number, and f (y | y0) be non-signal time slot sample value probability density function;
False-alarm probability PfThe probability that non-slot signal error is adjudicated, it is:
False dismissal probability PmI.e. by the probability of time slot signal mistaken verdict, it is:
When 3b) using dynamic decision thresholding, it is known that the probability that (N, M) MPPM block of informations empty slots occur is N-M/N, non-
The probability that empty slot occurs is M/N, then probability of miscarriage of justice of each time slot when existing for only white Gaussian noise is
The probability Distribution Model f of known compound channelh(h) mathematical model and in step 1), then each time slot can be calculated
The probability of mistaken verdict under by compound channel disturbed condition,
Step 4 utilizes Gauss Laguerre polynomials, obtains the closure expression formula of error sign ratio
When 4a) using optimal judgement thresholding, for (N, M) MPPM, the probability correctly demodulated is Pc=(1-Pm)M(1-Pf
)N-M, wherein pulse slot and the correct probability of non-pulse time slot be
Then error sign ratio is
In formula, HiIt is the weight in generalized Laguerre formula;xiFor i-th of Generalized Gaussian Laguerre polynomials;K is
The total item of Generalized Gaussian Laguerre polynomials.
When 4b) using dynamic decision thresholding, for (N, M) MPPM, the probability correctly demodulated is Pc=(1-SLER)N, then miss
Symbol rate is
The correctness and advantage of the present invention can be contrasted by following notional result and further illustrated:
Analytical Calculation, first, the formula that accurate description is derived are carried out by MATLAB;Then, compare have point tolerance and
There is no the situation of point tolerance;Secondly, the performance of optimal judgement thresholding and dynamic decision thresholding is compared;Finally, change wherein various
The value of variable.
Notional result
Fig. 1 is given under the compound channel of index weber EW turbulent flows and point tolerance, and that is modulated and demodulated using MPPM is wireless
Optical communication system model.Fig. 2 uses optimal judgement thresholding and dynamic decision threshold schemes under the conditions of being given at strong rapid and weak rapids, examines
Consider point tolerance and do not consider the comparison diagram that the error sign ratio in the case of two kinds of point tolerance changes with signal to noise ratio, it can be seen that consideration
Point tolerance is decreased obviously than bit error rate performance in the case of not considering point tolerance.Fig. 3 uses optimal judgement in the case of being given at middle rapids
Thresholding and dynamic decision threshold schemes, the comparison diagram that error sign ratio when aperture diameter changes changes with signal to noise ratio.As can be seen that
With the increase of receiving aperture, the error sign ratio of two kinds of decision thresholds is decreased obviously, and communication performance improves.Fig. 4 is given at
Optimal judgement thresholding and dynamic decision threshold schemes are used in the case of weak rapids, error sign ratio when shake variance changes is with signal to noise ratio
The comparison diagram of change.As can be seen that with the reduction of shake variance, the error sign ratio of two kinds of decision thresholds is decreased obviously,
Performance improves.Fig. 5,6 be given at it is strong rapid and it is weak it is rapid under the conditions of optimal judgement thresholding and dynamic decision threshold schemes, ripple is respectively adopted
The comparison diagram that error sign ratio when beam width changes changes with signal to noise ratio.It can be seen that beam angle when low signal-to-noise ratio
Narrower performance is better, and beam angle more wide feature is better when high s/n ratio.Because when signal to noise ratio is smaller, system
Error sign ratio is mainly influenceed by transmit power, and beam angle is narrower, and the luminous power being collected into is bigger, the error sign ratio of system
Can be better.And when signal to noise ratio increases to certain value, system error sign ratio is mainly influenceed by collimating fault.Now, it is wide
The facula area that beam angle reaches receiving terminal is greater than narrow beam angle, that is, the light intensity received is big, then the mistake of system
Symbol rate is lower.
The invention is not limited in above-described embodiment, on the basis of technical scheme disclosed by the invention, the skill of this area
Art personnel are according to disclosed technology contents, it is not necessary to which performing creative labour can makes one to some of which technical characteristic
A little to replace and deform, these are replaced and deformation is within the scope of the present invention.
Claims (6)
1. the MPPM-FSO systems based on EW composite channel models demodulate error sign ratio computational methods firmly, comprise the steps:
1) it is distributed based on index weber EW, it is contemplated that the influence of point tolerance, establish the compound letter of point-to-point FSO
Road model;
2) according to index weber EW turbulent flows and the cumulative distribution model F of the composite channel model of point tolerancehAnd probability distribution mould (h)
Type fh(h) threshold value of optimal judgement thresholding and dynamic decision thresholding is determined;
3) mistaken verdict of each time slot under by index weber EW turbulent flows and point tolerance compound channel disturbed condition is calculated
Probability;
4) Gauss Laguerre polynomials are utilized, obtain the closure expression formula of error sign ratio.
2. the MPPM-FSO systems according to claim 1 based on EW composite channel models demodulate error sign ratio calculating side firmly
Method, it is characterised in that in the step 1), be distributed based on index weber EW, it is contemplated that the influence of point tolerance, establish point-to-point
FSO composite channel model, realized by following methods:
1a) establish point-to-point FSO composite channel model:
If x is sends signal sequence, y is reception signal sequence, then the mathematical modeling of channel is:
Y=Rhx+n
Wherein, n represent average be 0, variance beAdditive white Gaussian noise;R is photodetector responsiveness, and h refers to for obedience
The channel fading of several webers of EW compound channels distributions, h=hahp;Wherein, haTo obey the channel fading of index weber EW distributions,
hpFor point tolerance loss factor;
1b) according to step 1a) probability Distribution Models of obtained mathematical modeling structure index weber EW distributed modelsWith
The probability Distribution Model of point tolerance
Wherein, haTo obey the channel fading of index weber EW distributions, hpFor point tolerance loss factor;β is form parameter, β > 0;
α is in given observation space, collimates the average magnitude that the light beam of propagation is successfully received with the light beam of non-aligned propagation, α > 0;η is
Scale parameter, η > 0;γ be equivalent beam angle and shake standard deviation ratio, γ=wzeq/2σs;Wherein wzeqFor equivalent ripple
Beam width, σsTo shake standard deviation;A0For the light that receiver receives when the offset between detector and beam center is 0
By force, A0=[erf (v)]2, wherein ν is the ratio of the beam angle at aperture and distance z,Wherein a is spy
Survey the aperture radius of device, wzFor the beam angle at the z of range transmission end;
1c) formula then can obtain the cumulative distribution model F of the composite channel model of atmospheric turbulance and point tolerance by above-mentioned 1., 2.h(h)
With probability Distribution Model fh(h):
<mrow>
<msub>
<mi>F</mi>
<mi>h</mi>
</msub>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mi>h</mi>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<mo>=</mo>
<mfrac>
<mrow>
<msup>
<mi>&alpha;&gamma;</mi>
<mn>2</mn>
</msup>
</mrow>
<mi>&beta;</mi>
</mfrac>
<msup>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mfrac>
<mi>h</mi>
<mrow>
<msub>
<mi>&eta;A</mi>
<mn>0</mn>
</msub>
</mrow>
</mfrac>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<msup>
<mi>&gamma;</mi>
<mn>2</mn>
</msup>
</msup>
<munderover>
<mi>&Sigma;</mi>
<mrow>
<mi>j</mi>
<mo>=</mo>
<mn>0</mn>
</mrow>
<mi>&infin;</mi>
</munderover>
<mfrac>
<mrow>
<mi>&Gamma;</mi>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mi>&alpha;</mi>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
</mrow>
<mrow>
<mi>&Gamma;</mi>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mrow>
<mi>&alpha;</mi>
<mo>-</mo>
<mi>j</mi>
</mrow>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
</mrow>
</mfrac>
<mfrac>
<msup>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mrow>
<mo>-</mo>
<mn>1</mn>
</mrow>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<mi>j</mi>
</msup>
<mrow>
<mi>j</mi>
<mo>!</mo>
<msup>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mrow>
<mn>1</mn>
<mo>+</mo>
<mi>j</mi>
</mrow>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<mrow>
<mn>1</mn>
<mo>-</mo>
<mfrac>
<msup>
<mi>&gamma;</mi>
<mn>2</mn>
</msup>
<mi>&beta;</mi>
</mfrac>
</mrow>
</msup>
</mrow>
</mfrac>
<msubsup>
<mi>G</mi>
<mrow>
<mn>2</mn>
<mo>,</mo>
<mn>3</mn>
</mrow>
<mrow>
<mn>2</mn>
<mo>,</mo>
<mn>1</mn>
</mrow>
</msubsup>
<mrow>
<mo>&lsqb;</mo>
<mrow>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mrow>
<mn>1</mn>
<mo>+</mo>
<mi>j</mi>
</mrow>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<msup>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mfrac>
<mi>h</mi>
<mrow>
<msub>
<mi>A</mi>
<mn>0</mn>
</msub>
<mi>&eta;</mi>
</mrow>
</mfrac>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<mi>&beta;</mi>
</msup>
<mo>|</mo>
<mtable>
<mtr>
<mtd>
<mrow>
<mn>1</mn>
<mo>-</mo>
<mfrac>
<msup>
<mi>&gamma;</mi>
<mn>2</mn>
</msup>
<mi>&beta;</mi>
</mfrac>
<mo>,</mo>
<mn>1</mn>
</mrow>
</mtd>
</mtr>
<mtr>
<mtd>
<mrow>
<mn>0</mn>
<mo>,</mo>
<mn>1</mn>
<mo>-</mo>
<mfrac>
<msup>
<mi>&gamma;</mi>
<mn>2</mn>
</msup>
<mi>&beta;</mi>
</mfrac>
<mo>,</mo>
<mo>-</mo>
<mfrac>
<msup>
<mi>&gamma;</mi>
<mn>2</mn>
</msup>
<mi>&beta;</mi>
</mfrac>
</mrow>
</mtd>
</mtr>
</mtable>
</mrow>
<mo>&rsqb;</mo>
</mrow>
<mo>,</mo>
</mrow>
<mrow>
<msub>
<mi>f</mi>
<mi>h</mi>
</msub>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mi>h</mi>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<mo>=</mo>
<mfrac>
<msup>
<mi>&gamma;</mi>
<mn>2</mn>
</msup>
<mrow>
<msup>
<msub>
<mi>A</mi>
<mn>0</mn>
</msub>
<msup>
<mi>&gamma;</mi>
<mn>2</mn>
</msup>
</msup>
</mrow>
</mfrac>
<msup>
<mi>h</mi>
<mrow>
<msup>
<mi>&gamma;</mi>
<mn>2</mn>
</msup>
<mo>-</mo>
<mn>1</mn>
</mrow>
</msup>
<mfrac>
<mi>&alpha;</mi>
<msup>
<mi>&eta;</mi>
<msup>
<mi>&gamma;</mi>
<mn>2</mn>
</msup>
</msup>
</mfrac>
<munderover>
<mi>&Sigma;</mi>
<mrow>
<mi>j</mi>
<mo>=</mo>
<mn>0</mn>
</mrow>
<mi>&infin;</mi>
</munderover>
<mfrac>
<mrow>
<mi>&Gamma;</mi>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mi>&alpha;</mi>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
</mrow>
<mrow>
<mi>&Gamma;</mi>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mrow>
<mi>&alpha;</mi>
<mo>-</mo>
<mi>j</mi>
</mrow>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
</mrow>
</mfrac>
<mfrac>
<msup>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mrow>
<mo>-</mo>
<mn>1</mn>
</mrow>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<mi>j</mi>
</msup>
<mrow>
<mi>j</mi>
<mo>!</mo>
<msup>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mrow>
<mn>1</mn>
<mo>+</mo>
<mi>j</mi>
</mrow>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<mrow>
<mn>1</mn>
<mo>-</mo>
<mfrac>
<msup>
<mi>&gamma;</mi>
<mn>2</mn>
</msup>
<mi>&beta;</mi>
</mfrac>
</mrow>
</msup>
</mrow>
</mfrac>
<mi>&Gamma;</mi>
<mrow>
<mo>&lsqb;</mo>
<mrow>
<mn>1</mn>
<mo>-</mo>
<mfrac>
<msup>
<mi>&gamma;</mi>
<mn>2</mn>
</msup>
<mi>&beta;</mi>
</mfrac>
<mo>,</mo>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mrow>
<mn>1</mn>
<mo>+</mo>
<mi>j</mi>
</mrow>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<msup>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mfrac>
<msub>
<mi>h</mi>
<mi>a</mi>
</msub>
<mrow>
<msub>
<mi>A</mi>
<mn>0</mn>
</msub>
<mi>&eta;</mi>
</mrow>
</mfrac>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<mi>&beta;</mi>
</msup>
</mrow>
<mo>&rsqb;</mo>
</mrow>
</mrow>
In formula, Γ (a, x) is upper gamma incomplete function,For Mayer G-function;J is the counter of summation symbol.
3. the MPPM-FSO systems according to claim 2 based on EW composite channel models demodulate error sign ratio calculating side firmly
Method, it is characterised in that in the step 2), the threshold settings of optimal judgement thresholding utilize Matlab by dichotomy to following formula
Seek unknown number ythObtain:
<mfenced open = "" close = "">
<mtable>
<mtr>
<mtd>
<mrow>
<mi>M</mi>
<msubsup>
<mo>&Integral;</mo>
<mn>0</mn>
<mi>&infin;</mi>
</msubsup>
<mi>exp</mi>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mrow>
<mfrac>
<mrow>
<mn>2</mn>
<msub>
<mi>y</mi>
<mrow>
<mi>t</mi>
<mi>h</mi>
</mrow>
</msub>
<mi>g</mi>
<mi>t</mi>
</mrow>
<mi>&mu;</mi>
</mfrac>
<mo>-</mo>
<msup>
<mi>gt</mi>
<mn>2</mn>
</msup>
</mrow>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<mfrac>
<mrow>
<msup>
<mi>&alpha;&gamma;</mi>
<mn>2</mn>
</msup>
</mrow>
<msup>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mrow>
<msub>
<mi>A</mi>
<mn>0</mn>
</msub>
<mi>&eta;</mi>
</mrow>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<msup>
<mi>&gamma;</mi>
<mn>2</mn>
</msup>
</msup>
</mfrac>
<msup>
<mi>t</mi>
<mrow>
<msup>
<mi>&gamma;</mi>
<mn>2</mn>
</msup>
<mo>-</mo>
<mn>1</mn>
</mrow>
</msup>
<munderover>
<mi>&Sigma;</mi>
<mrow>
<mi>j</mi>
<mo>=</mo>
<mn>0</mn>
</mrow>
<mi>&infin;</mi>
</munderover>
<mfrac>
<mrow>
<mi>&Gamma;</mi>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mi>&alpha;</mi>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
</mrow>
<mrow>
<mi>&Gamma;</mi>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mrow>
<mi>&alpha;</mi>
<mo>-</mo>
<mi>j</mi>
</mrow>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
</mrow>
</mfrac>
<mfrac>
<msup>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mrow>
<mo>-</mo>
<mn>1</mn>
</mrow>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<mi>j</mi>
</msup>
<mrow>
<mi>j</mi>
<mo>!</mo>
<msup>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mrow>
<mn>1</mn>
<mo>+</mo>
<mi>j</mi>
</mrow>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<mrow>
<mn>1</mn>
<mo>-</mo>
<mfrac>
<msup>
<mi>&gamma;</mi>
<mn>2</mn>
</msup>
<mi>&beta;</mi>
</mfrac>
</mrow>
</msup>
</mrow>
</mfrac>
<mi>d</mi>
<mi>t</mi>
</mrow>
</mtd>
</mtr>
<mtr>
<mtd>
<mrow>
<mo>&times;</mo>
<mi>&Gamma;</mi>
<mrow>
<mo>&lsqb;</mo>
<mrow>
<mn>1</mn>
<mo>-</mo>
<mfrac>
<msup>
<mi>&gamma;</mi>
<mn>2</mn>
</msup>
<mi>&beta;</mi>
</mfrac>
<mo>,</mo>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mrow>
<mn>1</mn>
<mo>+</mo>
<mi>j</mi>
</mrow>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<msup>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mfrac>
<mi>t</mi>
<mrow>
<msub>
<mi>A</mi>
<mn>0</mn>
</msub>
<mi>&eta;</mi>
</mrow>
</mfrac>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<mi>&beta;</mi>
</msup>
</mrow>
<mo>&rsqb;</mo>
</mrow>
<mi>d</mi>
<mi>t</mi>
<mrow>
<mo>&lsqb;</mo>
<mrow>
<mn>1</mn>
<mo>+</mo>
<mi>e</mi>
<mi>r</mi>
<mi>f</mi>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mfrac>
<mrow>
<msub>
<mi>y</mi>
<mrow>
<mi>t</mi>
<mi>h</mi>
</mrow>
</msub>
<msqrt>
<mi>g</mi>
</msqrt>
</mrow>
<mi>&mu;</mi>
</mfrac>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
</mrow>
<mo>&rsqb;</mo>
</mrow>
</mrow>
</mtd>
</mtr>
<mtr>
<mtd>
<mrow>
<mo>=</mo>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mrow>
<mi>N</mi>
<mo>-</mo>
<mi>M</mi>
</mrow>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<msubsup>
<mo>&Integral;</mo>
<mn>0</mn>
<mi>&infin;</mi>
</msubsup>
<mfrac>
<mrow>
<msup>
<mi>&alpha;&gamma;</mi>
<mn>2</mn>
</msup>
</mrow>
<msup>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mrow>
<msub>
<mi>A</mi>
<mn>0</mn>
</msub>
<mi>&eta;</mi>
</mrow>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<msup>
<mi>&gamma;</mi>
<mn>2</mn>
</msup>
</msup>
</mfrac>
<msup>
<mi>t</mi>
<mrow>
<msup>
<mi>&gamma;</mi>
<mn>2</mn>
</msup>
<mo>-</mo>
<mn>1</mn>
</mrow>
</msup>
<munderover>
<mi>&Sigma;</mi>
<mrow>
<mi>j</mi>
<mo>=</mo>
<mn>0</mn>
</mrow>
<mi>&infin;</mi>
</munderover>
<mfrac>
<mrow>
<mi>&Gamma;</mi>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mi>&alpha;</mi>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
</mrow>
<mrow>
<mi>&Gamma;</mi>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mrow>
<mi>&alpha;</mi>
<mo>-</mo>
<mi>j</mi>
</mrow>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
</mrow>
</mfrac>
<mfrac>
<msup>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mrow>
<mo>-</mo>
<mn>1</mn>
</mrow>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<mi>j</mi>
</msup>
<mrow>
<mi>j</mi>
<mo>!</mo>
<msup>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mrow>
<mn>1</mn>
<mo>+</mo>
<mi>j</mi>
</mrow>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<mrow>
<mn>1</mn>
<mo>-</mo>
<mfrac>
<msup>
<mi>&gamma;</mi>
<mn>2</mn>
</msup>
<mi>&beta;</mi>
</mfrac>
</mrow>
</msup>
</mrow>
</mfrac>
<mi>&Gamma;</mi>
<mrow>
<mo>&lsqb;</mo>
<mrow>
<mn>1</mn>
<mo>-</mo>
<mfrac>
<msup>
<mi>&gamma;</mi>
<mn>2</mn>
</msup>
<mi>&beta;</mi>
</mfrac>
<mo>,</mo>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mrow>
<mn>1</mn>
<mo>+</mo>
<mi>j</mi>
</mrow>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<msup>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mfrac>
<mi>t</mi>
<mrow>
<msub>
<mi>A</mi>
<mn>0</mn>
</msub>
<mi>&eta;</mi>
</mrow>
</mfrac>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<mi>&beta;</mi>
</msup>
</mrow>
<mo>&rsqb;</mo>
</mrow>
<mi>d</mi>
<mi>t</mi>
</mrow>
</mtd>
</mtr>
<mtr>
<mtd>
<mrow>
<mo>&times;</mo>
<mi>e</mi>
<mi>r</mi>
<mi>f</mi>
<mi>c</mi>
<mrow>
<mo>&lsqb;</mo>
<mfrac>
<mrow>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mrow>
<msub>
<mi>y</mi>
<mrow>
<mi>t</mi>
<mi>h</mi>
</mrow>
</msub>
<mo>-</mo>
<mi>&mu;</mi>
<mi>t</mi>
</mrow>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<msqrt>
<mi>g</mi>
</msqrt>
</mrow>
<mi>&mu;</mi>
</mfrac>
<mo>&rsqb;</mo>
</mrow>
</mrow>
</mtd>
</mtr>
</mtable>
</mfenced>
In formula, number of time slots that a block of information that N is modulated by MPPM includes, M is the pulse in this N number of number of time slots
Number;T is the integration variable of integrand;ythFor threshold value;μ is coefficient, and μ2=(RNPt/M)2, R is photoelectric transformation efficiency, Pt
For the average emitted power of transmitting terminal;G is signal to noise ratio;Exp () is the exponential function using natural number e the bottom of as;Γ () is gamma
Function;Erf () is error function;Erfc () is cosine error function;J is the counter of summation symbol.
4. the MPPM-FSO systems according to claim 1 based on EW composite channel models demodulate error sign ratio calculating side firmly
Method, it is characterised in that the threshold value of dynamic decision thresholding is to detect the signal of each time slot, takes the 200ns of its signal leading edge,
Signal intensity according to being detected in this period takes the value of setting dynamic decision thresholding.
5. the MPPM-FSO systems according to claim 3 based on EW composite channel models demodulate error sign ratio calculating side firmly
Method, it is characterised in that in the step 3), calculate each time slot in the compound channel by index weber EW turbulent flows and point tolerance
The probability of mistaken verdict under disturbed condition, realized by following methods:
When 3a) using optimal judgement thresholding, it is known that the probability Distribution Model f of compound channelh(h) mathematical model and in step 1),
Can then calculate by non-slot signal f under index weber EW turbulent flows and point tolerance disturbed condition (y | y0) and time slot signal f (y |
y1) probability density function of sample value is respectively:
<mrow>
<mi>f</mi>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mi>y</mi>
<mo>|</mo>
<msub>
<mi>y</mi>
<mn>0</mn>
</msub>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<mo>=</mo>
<mfrac>
<mn>1</mn>
<mrow>
<msqrt>
<mrow>
<mn>2</mn>
<mi>&pi;</mi>
</mrow>
</msqrt>
<msub>
<mi>&sigma;</mi>
<mi>n</mi>
</msub>
</mrow>
</mfrac>
<mi>exp</mi>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mo>-</mo>
<mfrac>
<msup>
<mi>y</mi>
<mn>2</mn>
</msup>
<mrow>
<mn>2</mn>
<msup>
<msub>
<mi>&sigma;</mi>
<mi>n</mi>
</msub>
<mn>2</mn>
</msup>
</mrow>
</mfrac>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
</mrow>
<mfenced open = "" close = "">
<mtable>
<mtr>
<mtd>
<mrow>
<mi>f</mi>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mrow>
<mi>y</mi>
<mo>|</mo>
<msub>
<mi>y</mi>
<mn>1</mn>
</msub>
</mrow>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<mo>=</mo>
<mfrac>
<mn>1</mn>
<mi>&mu;</mi>
</mfrac>
<msub>
<mi>f</mi>
<mi>h</mi>
</msub>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mfrac>
<mi>y</mi>
<mi>&mu;</mi>
</mfrac>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<mo>*</mo>
<msub>
<mi>f</mi>
<mi>n</mi>
</msub>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mi>y</mi>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
</mrow>
</mtd>
</mtr>
<mtr>
<mtd>
<mrow>
<mo>=</mo>
<mfrac>
<mn>1</mn>
<mi>&mu;</mi>
</mfrac>
<msubsup>
<mo>&Integral;</mo>
<mn>0</mn>
<mi>&infin;</mi>
</msubsup>
<mfrac>
<mrow>
<msup>
<mi>&alpha;&gamma;</mi>
<mn>2</mn>
</msup>
</mrow>
<msup>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mrow>
<msub>
<mi>&eta;A</mi>
<mn>0</mn>
</msub>
</mrow>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<msup>
<mi>&gamma;</mi>
<mn>2</mn>
</msup>
</msup>
</mfrac>
<msup>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mfrac>
<mi>h</mi>
<mi>&mu;</mi>
</mfrac>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<mrow>
<msup>
<mi>&gamma;</mi>
<mn>2</mn>
</msup>
<mo>-</mo>
<mn>1</mn>
</mrow>
</msup>
<munderover>
<mi>&Sigma;</mi>
<mrow>
<mi>j</mi>
<mo>=</mo>
<mn>0</mn>
</mrow>
<mi>&infin;</mi>
</munderover>
<mfrac>
<mrow>
<mi>&Gamma;</mi>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mi>&alpha;</mi>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
</mrow>
<mrow>
<mi>&Gamma;</mi>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mrow>
<mi>&alpha;</mi>
<mo>-</mo>
<mi>j</mi>
</mrow>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
</mrow>
</mfrac>
<mfrac>
<msup>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mrow>
<mo>-</mo>
<mn>1</mn>
</mrow>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<mi>j</mi>
</msup>
<mrow>
<mi>j</mi>
<mo>!</mo>
<msup>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mrow>
<mn>1</mn>
<mo>+</mo>
<mi>j</mi>
</mrow>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<mrow>
<mn>1</mn>
<mo>-</mo>
<mfrac>
<msup>
<mi>&gamma;</mi>
<mn>2</mn>
</msup>
<mi>&beta;</mi>
</mfrac>
</mrow>
</msup>
</mrow>
</mfrac>
</mrow>
</mtd>
</mtr>
<mtr>
<mtd>
<mrow>
<mi>&Gamma;</mi>
<mrow>
<mo>&lsqb;</mo>
<mrow>
<mn>1</mn>
<mo>-</mo>
<mfrac>
<msup>
<mi>&gamma;</mi>
<mn>2</mn>
</msup>
<mi>&beta;</mi>
</mfrac>
<mo>,</mo>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mrow>
<mn>1</mn>
<mo>+</mo>
<mi>j</mi>
</mrow>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<msup>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mfrac>
<msub>
<mi>h</mi>
<mi>a</mi>
</msub>
<mrow>
<msub>
<mi>A</mi>
<mn>0</mn>
</msub>
<mi>&eta;</mi>
</mrow>
</mfrac>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<mi>&beta;</mi>
</msup>
</mrow>
<mo>&rsqb;</mo>
</mrow>
<mo>&times;</mo>
<mfrac>
<mn>1</mn>
<mrow>
<msqrt>
<mrow>
<mn>2</mn>
<mi>&pi;</mi>
</mrow>
</msqrt>
<msub>
<mi>&sigma;</mi>
<mi>n</mi>
</msub>
</mrow>
</mfrac>
<mi>exp</mi>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mrow>
<mo>-</mo>
<mfrac>
<msup>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mrow>
<mi>y</mi>
<mo>-</mo>
<mi>h</mi>
</mrow>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<mn>2</mn>
</msup>
<mrow>
<mn>2</mn>
<msup>
<msub>
<mi>&sigma;</mi>
<mi>n</mi>
</msub>
<mn>2</mn>
</msup>
</mrow>
</mfrac>
</mrow>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<mi>d</mi>
<mi>h</mi>
</mrow>
</mtd>
</mtr>
</mtable>
</mfenced>
In formula, σn 2For the variance of additive white Gaussian noise;f(y|y1) it is to have the probability density function of signal slot sample value, f (y
|y0) be no signal time slot sample value probability density function;
By non-slot signal f (y | y0) mistaken verdict probability, i.e. false-alarm probability PfFor:
<mfenced open = "" close = "">
<mtable>
<mtr>
<mtd>
<mrow>
<msub>
<mi>P</mi>
<mi>f</mi>
</msub>
<mo>=</mo>
<msubsup>
<mo>&Integral;</mo>
<msub>
<mi>y</mi>
<mrow>
<mi>t</mi>
<mi>h</mi>
</mrow>
</msub>
<mi>&infin;</mi>
</msubsup>
<mi>f</mi>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mi>y</mi>
<mo>|</mo>
<msub>
<mi>y</mi>
<mn>0</mn>
</msub>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<mi>d</mi>
<mi>y</mi>
</mrow>
</mtd>
</mtr>
<mtr>
<mtd>
<mrow>
<mo>=</mo>
<mn>1</mn>
<mo>-</mo>
<mfrac>
<mn>1</mn>
<mn>2</mn>
</mfrac>
<mo>&lsqb;</mo>
<mn>1</mn>
<mo>+</mo>
<mi>e</mi>
<mi>r</mi>
<mi>f</mi>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mfrac>
<msub>
<mi>y</mi>
<mrow>
<mi>t</mi>
<mi>h</mi>
</mrow>
</msub>
<mrow>
<msqrt>
<mn>2</mn>
</msqrt>
<msub>
<mi>&sigma;</mi>
<mi>n</mi>
</msub>
</mrow>
</mfrac>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<mo>&rsqb;</mo>
</mrow>
</mtd>
</mtr>
</mtable>
</mfenced>
By time slot signal f (y | y1) mistaken verdict probability, i.e. false dismissal probability PmFor:
<mfenced open = "" close = "">
<mtable>
<mtr>
<mtd>
<mrow>
<msub>
<mi>P</mi>
<mi>m</mi>
</msub>
<mo>=</mo>
<msubsup>
<mo>&Integral;</mo>
<mrow>
<mo>-</mo>
<mi>&infin;</mi>
</mrow>
<msub>
<mi>y</mi>
<mrow>
<mi>t</mi>
<mi>h</mi>
</mrow>
</msub>
</msubsup>
<mi>f</mi>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mrow>
<mi>y</mi>
<mo>|</mo>
<msub>
<mi>y</mi>
<mn>1</mn>
</msub>
</mrow>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<mi>d</mi>
<mi>y</mi>
</mrow>
</mtd>
</mtr>
<mtr>
<mtd>
<mrow>
<mo>=</mo>
<mn>1</mn>
<mo>-</mo>
<msubsup>
<mo>&Integral;</mo>
<mn>0</mn>
<mi>&infin;</mi>
</msubsup>
<mfrac>
<mn>1</mn>
<mn>2</mn>
</mfrac>
<mi>e</mi>
<mi>r</mi>
<mi>f</mi>
<mi>c</mi>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mfrac>
<mrow>
<msub>
<mi>y</mi>
<mrow>
<mi>t</mi>
<mi>h</mi>
</mrow>
</msub>
<mo>-</mo>
<mi>&mu;</mi>
<mi>t</mi>
</mrow>
<mrow>
<msqrt>
<mn>2</mn>
</msqrt>
<msub>
<mi>&sigma;</mi>
<mi>n</mi>
</msub>
</mrow>
</mfrac>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<mfrac>
<mrow>
<msup>
<mi>&alpha;&gamma;</mi>
<mn>2</mn>
</msup>
</mrow>
<msup>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mrow>
<msub>
<mi>A</mi>
<mn>0</mn>
</msub>
<mi>&eta;</mi>
</mrow>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<msup>
<mi>&gamma;</mi>
<mn>2</mn>
</msup>
</msup>
</mfrac>
<msup>
<mi>t</mi>
<mrow>
<msup>
<mi>&gamma;</mi>
<mn>2</mn>
</msup>
<mo>-</mo>
<mn>1</mn>
</mrow>
</msup>
<munderover>
<mi>&Sigma;</mi>
<mrow>
<mi>j</mi>
<mo>=</mo>
<mn>0</mn>
</mrow>
<mi>&infin;</mi>
</munderover>
<mfrac>
<mrow>
<mi>&Gamma;</mi>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mi>&alpha;</mi>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
</mrow>
<mrow>
<mi>&Gamma;</mi>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mrow>
<mi>&alpha;</mi>
<mo>-</mo>
<mi>j</mi>
</mrow>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
</mrow>
</mfrac>
<mfrac>
<msup>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mrow>
<mo>-</mo>
<mn>1</mn>
</mrow>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<mi>j</mi>
</msup>
<mrow>
<mi>j</mi>
<mo>!</mo>
<msup>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mrow>
<mn>1</mn>
<mo>+</mo>
<mi>j</mi>
</mrow>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<mrow>
<mn>1</mn>
<mo>-</mo>
<mfrac>
<msup>
<mi>&gamma;</mi>
<mn>2</mn>
</msup>
<mi>&beta;</mi>
</mfrac>
</mrow>
</msup>
</mrow>
</mfrac>
</mrow>
</mtd>
</mtr>
<mtr>
<mtd>
<mrow>
<mo>&times;</mo>
<mi>&Gamma;</mi>
<mrow>
<mo>&lsqb;</mo>
<mrow>
<mn>1</mn>
<mo>-</mo>
<mfrac>
<msup>
<mi>&gamma;</mi>
<mn>2</mn>
</msup>
<mi>&beta;</mi>
</mfrac>
<mo>,</mo>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mrow>
<mn>1</mn>
<mo>+</mo>
<mi>j</mi>
</mrow>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<msup>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mfrac>
<mi>t</mi>
<mrow>
<msub>
<mi>A</mi>
<mn>0</mn>
</msub>
<mi>&eta;</mi>
</mrow>
</mfrac>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<mi>&beta;</mi>
</msup>
</mrow>
<mo>&rsqb;</mo>
</mrow>
<mi>d</mi>
<mi>t</mi>
</mrow>
</mtd>
</mtr>
</mtable>
</mfenced>
When 3b) using dynamic decision thresholding, it is known that the probability that (N, M) MPPM block of informations empty slots occur is N-M/N, during non-NULL
The probability that gap occurs is M/N, then probability of miscarriage of justice of each time slot when existing for only white Gaussian noise is
<mrow>
<msub>
<mi>SLER</mi>
<mrow>
<mi>c</mi>
<mi>o</mi>
<mi>n</mi>
<mi>d</mi>
</mrow>
</msub>
<mo>=</mo>
<mfrac>
<mi>M</mi>
<mrow>
<mn>2</mn>
<mi>N</mi>
</mrow>
</mfrac>
<mi>e</mi>
<mi>r</mi>
<mi>f</mi>
<mi>c</mi>
<mo>&lsqb;</mo>
<msqrt>
<mi>g</mi>
</msqrt>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mfrac>
<mn>1</mn>
<mn>2</mn>
</mfrac>
<mo>-</mo>
<mfrac>
<mn>1</mn>
<mrow>
<mn>2</mn>
<mi>g</mi>
</mrow>
</mfrac>
<mi>l</mi>
<mi>n</mi>
<mfrac>
<mrow>
<mi>N</mi>
<mo>-</mo>
<mi>M</mi>
</mrow>
<mi>M</mi>
</mfrac>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<mo>&rsqb;</mo>
<mo>+</mo>
<mfrac>
<mrow>
<mi>N</mi>
<mo>-</mo>
<mi>M</mi>
</mrow>
<mrow>
<mn>2</mn>
<mi>N</mi>
</mrow>
</mfrac>
<mi>e</mi>
<mi>r</mi>
<mi>f</mi>
<mi>c</mi>
<mo>&lsqb;</mo>
<msqrt>
<mi>g</mi>
</msqrt>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mfrac>
<mn>1</mn>
<mn>2</mn>
</mfrac>
<mo>+</mo>
<mfrac>
<mn>1</mn>
<mrow>
<mn>2</mn>
<mi>g</mi>
</mrow>
</mfrac>
<mi>l</mi>
<mi>n</mi>
<mfrac>
<mrow>
<mi>N</mi>
<mo>-</mo>
<mi>M</mi>
</mrow>
<mi>M</mi>
</mfrac>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<mo>&rsqb;</mo>
</mrow>
Mathematical model in the probability Distribution Model and step 1) of known compound channel, then each time slot can be calculated in index weber
EW turbulent flows and the probability of the mistaken verdict under point tolerance disturbed condition:
<mrow>
<mtable>
<mtr>
<mtd>
<mrow>
<mi>S</mi>
<mi>L</mi>
<mi>E</mi>
<mi>R</mi>
<mo>=</mo>
<msubsup>
<mo>&Integral;</mo>
<mn>0</mn>
<mi>&infin;</mi>
</msubsup>
<mi>S</mi>
<mi>L</mi>
<mi>E</mi>
<mi>R</mi>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mrow>
<mi>g</mi>
<mo>,</mo>
<mi>h</mi>
</mrow>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<msub>
<mi>f</mi>
<mi>h</mi>
</msub>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mi>h</mi>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<mi>d</mi>
<mi>h</mi>
</mrow>
</mtd>
</mtr>
<mtr>
<mtd>
<mrow>
<mo>=</mo>
<msubsup>
<mo>&Integral;</mo>
<mn>0</mn>
<mi>&infin;</mi>
</msubsup>
<mfrac>
<mi>M</mi>
<mrow>
<mn>2</mn>
<mi>N</mi>
</mrow>
</mfrac>
<mi>e</mi>
<mi>r</mi>
<mi>f</mi>
<mi>c</mi>
<mrow>
<mo>&lsqb;</mo>
<mrow>
<msqrt>
<mrow>
<msup>
<mi>gh</mi>
<mn>2</mn>
</msup>
</mrow>
</msqrt>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mrow>
<mfrac>
<mn>1</mn>
<mn>2</mn>
</mfrac>
<mo>-</mo>
<mfrac>
<mn>1</mn>
<mrow>
<mn>2</mn>
<msup>
<mi>gh</mi>
<mn>2</mn>
</msup>
</mrow>
</mfrac>
<mi>ln</mi>
<mfrac>
<mrow>
<mi>N</mi>
<mo>-</mo>
<mi>M</mi>
</mrow>
<mi>M</mi>
</mfrac>
</mrow>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
</mrow>
<mo>&rsqb;</mo>
</mrow>
<mfrac>
<mrow>
<msup>
<mi>&alpha;&gamma;</mi>
<mn>2</mn>
</msup>
</mrow>
<msup>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mrow>
<msub>
<mi>A</mi>
<mn>0</mn>
</msub>
<mi>&eta;</mi>
</mrow>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<msup>
<mi>&gamma;</mi>
<mn>2</mn>
</msup>
</msup>
</mfrac>
<msup>
<mi>t</mi>
<mrow>
<msup>
<mi>&gamma;</mi>
<mn>2</mn>
</msup>
<mo>-</mo>
<mn>1</mn>
</mrow>
</msup>
<munderover>
<mi>&Sigma;</mi>
<mrow>
<mi>j</mi>
<mo>=</mo>
<mn>0</mn>
</mrow>
<mi>&infin;</mi>
</munderover>
<mfrac>
<mrow>
<mi>&Gamma;</mi>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mi>&alpha;</mi>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
</mrow>
<mrow>
<mi>&Gamma;</mi>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mrow>
<mi>&alpha;</mi>
<mo>-</mo>
<mi>j</mi>
</mrow>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
</mrow>
</mfrac>
</mrow>
</mtd>
</mtr>
<mtr>
<mtd>
<mrow>
<mo>&times;</mo>
<mfrac>
<msup>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mrow>
<mo>-</mo>
<mn>1</mn>
</mrow>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<mi>j</mi>
</msup>
<mrow>
<mi>j</mi>
<mo>!</mo>
<msup>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mrow>
<mn>1</mn>
<mo>+</mo>
<mi>j</mi>
</mrow>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<mrow>
<mn>1</mn>
<mo>-</mo>
<mfrac>
<msup>
<mi>&gamma;</mi>
<mn>2</mn>
</msup>
<mi>&beta;</mi>
</mfrac>
</mrow>
</msup>
</mrow>
</mfrac>
<mi>&Gamma;</mi>
<mrow>
<mo>&lsqb;</mo>
<mrow>
<mn>1</mn>
<mo>-</mo>
<mfrac>
<msup>
<mi>&gamma;</mi>
<mn>2</mn>
</msup>
<mi>&beta;</mi>
</mfrac>
<mo>,</mo>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mrow>
<mn>1</mn>
<mo>+</mo>
<mi>j</mi>
</mrow>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<msup>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mfrac>
<mi>t</mi>
<mrow>
<msub>
<mi>A</mi>
<mn>0</mn>
</msub>
<mi>&eta;</mi>
</mrow>
</mfrac>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<mi>&beta;</mi>
</msup>
</mrow>
<mo>&rsqb;</mo>
</mrow>
<mi>d</mi>
<mi>h</mi>
</mrow>
</mtd>
</mtr>
<mtr>
<mtd>
<mrow>
<mo>+</mo>
<msubsup>
<mo>&Integral;</mo>
<mn>0</mn>
<mi>&infin;</mi>
</msubsup>
<mfrac>
<mrow>
<mi>N</mi>
<mo>-</mo>
<mi>M</mi>
</mrow>
<mrow>
<mn>2</mn>
<mi>N</mi>
</mrow>
</mfrac>
<mi>e</mi>
<mi>r</mi>
<mi>f</mi>
<mi>c</mi>
<mrow>
<mo>&lsqb;</mo>
<mrow>
<msqrt>
<mrow>
<msup>
<mi>gh</mi>
<mn>2</mn>
</msup>
</mrow>
</msqrt>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mrow>
<mfrac>
<mn>1</mn>
<mn>2</mn>
</mfrac>
<mo>+</mo>
<mfrac>
<mn>1</mn>
<mrow>
<mn>2</mn>
<msup>
<mi>gh</mi>
<mn>2</mn>
</msup>
</mrow>
</mfrac>
<mi>ln</mi>
<mfrac>
<mrow>
<mi>N</mi>
<mo>-</mo>
<mi>M</mi>
</mrow>
<mi>M</mi>
</mfrac>
</mrow>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
</mrow>
<mo>&rsqb;</mo>
</mrow>
<mfrac>
<mrow>
<msup>
<mi>&alpha;&gamma;</mi>
<mn>2</mn>
</msup>
</mrow>
<msup>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mrow>
<msub>
<mi>A</mi>
<mn>0</mn>
</msub>
<mi>&eta;</mi>
</mrow>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<msup>
<mi>&gamma;</mi>
<mn>2</mn>
</msup>
</msup>
</mfrac>
<msup>
<mi>t</mi>
<mrow>
<msup>
<mi>&gamma;</mi>
<mn>2</mn>
</msup>
<mo>-</mo>
<mn>1</mn>
</mrow>
</msup>
<munderover>
<mi>&Sigma;</mi>
<mrow>
<mi>j</mi>
<mo>=</mo>
<mn>0</mn>
</mrow>
<mi>&infin;</mi>
</munderover>
<mfrac>
<mrow>
<mi>&Gamma;</mi>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mi>&alpha;</mi>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
</mrow>
<mrow>
<mi>&Gamma;</mi>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mrow>
<mi>&alpha;</mi>
<mo>-</mo>
<mi>j</mi>
</mrow>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
</mrow>
</mfrac>
</mrow>
</mtd>
</mtr>
<mtr>
<mtd>
<mrow>
<mo>&times;</mo>
<mfrac>
<msup>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mrow>
<mo>-</mo>
<mn>1</mn>
</mrow>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<mi>j</mi>
</msup>
<mrow>
<mi>j</mi>
<mo>!</mo>
<msup>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mrow>
<mn>1</mn>
<mo>+</mo>
<mi>j</mi>
</mrow>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<mrow>
<mn>1</mn>
<mo>-</mo>
<mfrac>
<msup>
<mi>&gamma;</mi>
<mn>2</mn>
</msup>
<mi>&beta;</mi>
</mfrac>
</mrow>
</msup>
</mrow>
</mfrac>
<mi>&Gamma;</mi>
<mrow>
<mo>&lsqb;</mo>
<mrow>
<mn>1</mn>
<mo>-</mo>
<mfrac>
<msup>
<mi>&gamma;</mi>
<mn>2</mn>
</msup>
<mi>&beta;</mi>
</mfrac>
<mo>,</mo>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mrow>
<mn>1</mn>
<mo>+</mo>
<mi>j</mi>
</mrow>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<msup>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mfrac>
<mi>t</mi>
<mrow>
<msub>
<mi>A</mi>
<mn>0</mn>
</msub>
<mi>&eta;</mi>
</mrow>
</mfrac>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<mi>&beta;</mi>
</msup>
</mrow>
<mo>&rsqb;</mo>
</mrow>
<mi>d</mi>
<mi>h</mi>
</mrow>
</mtd>
</mtr>
</mtable>
<mo>.</mo>
</mrow>
6. the MPPM-FSO systems based on EW composite channel models demodulate error sign ratio calculating side firmly according to claim 5
Method, it is characterised in that in the step 4), using Gauss Laguerre polynomials, obtain the closure expression formula of error sign ratio, be logical
Following methods are crossed to realize:
When 4a) using optimal judgement thresholding, for (N, M) MPPM, the probability correctly demodulated is Pc=(1-Pm)M(1-Pf)N-M, its
The middle correct probability of pulse slot and non-pulse time slot is
<mfenced open = "" close = "">
<mtable>
<mtr>
<mtd>
<mrow>
<mn>1</mn>
<mo>-</mo>
<msub>
<mi>P</mi>
<mi>m</mi>
</msub>
<mo>=</mo>
<msubsup>
<mo>&Integral;</mo>
<msub>
<mi>y</mi>
<mrow>
<mi>t</mi>
<mi>h</mi>
</mrow>
</msub>
<mi>&infin;</mi>
</msubsup>
<mi>f</mi>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mrow>
<mi>y</mi>
<mo>|</mo>
<msub>
<mi>y</mi>
<mn>1</mn>
</msub>
</mrow>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<mi>d</mi>
<mi>y</mi>
</mrow>
</mtd>
</mtr>
<mtr>
<mtd>
<mrow>
<mo>=</mo>
<msubsup>
<mo>&Integral;</mo>
<mn>0</mn>
<mi>&infin;</mi>
</msubsup>
<mfrac>
<mn>1</mn>
<mn>2</mn>
</mfrac>
<mi>e</mi>
<mi>r</mi>
<mi>f</mi>
<mi>c</mi>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mfrac>
<mrow>
<msub>
<mi>y</mi>
<mrow>
<mi>t</mi>
<mi>h</mi>
</mrow>
</msub>
<mo>-</mo>
<mi>&mu;</mi>
<mi>t</mi>
</mrow>
<mrow>
<msqrt>
<mn>2</mn>
</msqrt>
<msub>
<mi>&sigma;</mi>
<mi>n</mi>
</msub>
</mrow>
</mfrac>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<mfrac>
<mrow>
<msup>
<mi>&alpha;&gamma;</mi>
<mn>2</mn>
</msup>
</mrow>
<msup>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mrow>
<msub>
<mi>A</mi>
<mn>0</mn>
</msub>
<mi>&eta;</mi>
</mrow>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<msup>
<mi>&gamma;</mi>
<mn>2</mn>
</msup>
</msup>
</mfrac>
<msup>
<mi>t</mi>
<mrow>
<msup>
<mi>&gamma;</mi>
<mn>2</mn>
</msup>
<mo>-</mo>
<mn>1</mn>
</mrow>
</msup>
<munderover>
<mi>&Sigma;</mi>
<mrow>
<mi>j</mi>
<mo>=</mo>
<mn>0</mn>
</mrow>
<mi>&infin;</mi>
</munderover>
<mfrac>
<mrow>
<mi>&Gamma;</mi>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mi>&alpha;</mi>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
</mrow>
<mrow>
<mi>&Gamma;</mi>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mrow>
<mi>&alpha;</mi>
<mo>-</mo>
<mi>j</mi>
</mrow>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
</mrow>
</mfrac>
</mrow>
</mtd>
</mtr>
<mtr>
<mtd>
<mrow>
<mo>&times;</mo>
<mfrac>
<msup>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mrow>
<mo>-</mo>
<mn>1</mn>
</mrow>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<mi>j</mi>
</msup>
<mrow>
<mi>j</mi>
<mo>!</mo>
<msup>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mrow>
<mn>1</mn>
<mo>+</mo>
<mi>j</mi>
</mrow>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<mrow>
<mn>1</mn>
<mo>-</mo>
<mfrac>
<msup>
<mi>&gamma;</mi>
<mn>2</mn>
</msup>
<mi>&beta;</mi>
</mfrac>
</mrow>
</msup>
</mrow>
</mfrac>
<mi>&Gamma;</mi>
<mrow>
<mo>&lsqb;</mo>
<mrow>
<mn>1</mn>
<mo>-</mo>
<mfrac>
<msup>
<mi>&gamma;</mi>
<mn>2</mn>
</msup>
<mi>&beta;</mi>
</mfrac>
<mo>,</mo>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mrow>
<mn>1</mn>
<mo>+</mo>
<mi>j</mi>
</mrow>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<msup>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mfrac>
<mi>t</mi>
<mrow>
<msub>
<mi>A</mi>
<mn>0</mn>
</msub>
<mi>&eta;</mi>
</mrow>
</mfrac>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<mi>&beta;</mi>
</msup>
</mrow>
<mo>&rsqb;</mo>
</mrow>
<mi>d</mi>
<mi>t</mi>
</mrow>
</mtd>
</mtr>
</mtable>
</mfenced>
<mfenced open = "" close = "">
<mtable>
<mtr>
<mtd>
<mrow>
<mn>1</mn>
<mo>-</mo>
<msub>
<mi>P</mi>
<mi>f</mi>
</msub>
<mo>=</mo>
<msubsup>
<mo>&Integral;</mo>
<mrow>
<mo>-</mo>
<mi>&infin;</mi>
</mrow>
<msub>
<mi>y</mi>
<mrow>
<mi>t</mi>
<mi>h</mi>
</mrow>
</msub>
</msubsup>
<mfrac>
<mn>1</mn>
<mrow>
<msqrt>
<mrow>
<mn>2</mn>
<mi>&pi;</mi>
</mrow>
</msqrt>
<msub>
<mi>&sigma;</mi>
<mi>n</mi>
</msub>
</mrow>
</mfrac>
<mi>exp</mi>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mrow>
<mo>-</mo>
<mfrac>
<msup>
<mi>y</mi>
<mn>2</mn>
</msup>
<mrow>
<mn>2</mn>
<msup>
<msub>
<mi>&sigma;</mi>
<mi>n</mi>
</msub>
<mn>2</mn>
</msup>
</mrow>
</mfrac>
</mrow>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<mi>d</mi>
<mi>y</mi>
</mrow>
</mtd>
</mtr>
<mtr>
<mtd>
<mrow>
<mo>=</mo>
<mn>1</mn>
<mo>-</mo>
<msubsup>
<mo>&Integral;</mo>
<msub>
<mi>y</mi>
<mrow>
<mi>t</mi>
<mi>h</mi>
</mrow>
</msub>
<mi>&infin;</mi>
</msubsup>
<mfrac>
<mn>1</mn>
<mrow>
<msqrt>
<mrow>
<mn>2</mn>
<mi>&pi;</mi>
</mrow>
</msqrt>
<msub>
<mi>&sigma;</mi>
<mi>n</mi>
</msub>
</mrow>
</mfrac>
<mi>exp</mi>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mrow>
<mo>-</mo>
<mfrac>
<msup>
<mi>y</mi>
<mn>2</mn>
</msup>
<mrow>
<mn>2</mn>
<msup>
<msub>
<mi>&sigma;</mi>
<mi>n</mi>
</msub>
<mn>2</mn>
</msup>
</mrow>
</mfrac>
</mrow>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<mi>d</mi>
<mi>y</mi>
<mo>=</mo>
<mfrac>
<mn>1</mn>
<mn>2</mn>
</mfrac>
<mrow>
<mo>&lsqb;</mo>
<mrow>
<mn>1</mn>
<mo>+</mo>
<mi>e</mi>
<mi>r</mi>
<mi>f</mi>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mfrac>
<msub>
<mi>y</mi>
<mrow>
<mi>t</mi>
<mi>h</mi>
</mrow>
</msub>
<mrow>
<msqrt>
<mn>2</mn>
</msqrt>
<msub>
<mi>&sigma;</mi>
<mi>n</mi>
</msub>
</mrow>
</mfrac>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
</mrow>
<mo>&rsqb;</mo>
</mrow>
</mrow>
</mtd>
</mtr>
</mtable>
</mfenced>
Then error sign ratio is
<mfenced open = "" close = "">
<mtable>
<mtr>
<mtd>
<mrow>
<msub>
<mi>P</mi>
<mi>s</mi>
</msub>
<mo>=</mo>
<mn>1</mn>
<mo>-</mo>
<msub>
<mi>P</mi>
<mi>c</mi>
</msub>
</mrow>
</mtd>
</mtr>
<mtr>
<mtd>
<mrow>
<mo>=</mo>
<mn>1</mn>
<mo>-</mo>
<mfrac>
<mn>1</mn>
<msup>
<mn>2</mn>
<mi>N</mi>
</msup>
</mfrac>
<msup>
<mrow>
<mo>&lsqb;</mo>
<mrow>
<mn>1</mn>
<mo>+</mo>
<mi>e</mi>
<mi>r</mi>
<mi>f</mi>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mfrac>
<msub>
<mi>y</mi>
<mrow>
<mi>t</mi>
<mi>h</mi>
</mrow>
</msub>
<mrow>
<msqrt>
<mn>2</mn>
</msqrt>
<msub>
<mi>&sigma;</mi>
<mi>n</mi>
</msub>
</mrow>
</mfrac>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
</mrow>
<mo>&rsqb;</mo>
</mrow>
<mrow>
<mi>N</mi>
<mo>-</mo>
<mi>M</mi>
</mrow>
</msup>
<mo>{</mo>
<mn>2</mn>
<mo>-</mo>
<mfrac>
<mn>1</mn>
<msqrt>
<mi>&pi;</mi>
</msqrt>
</mfrac>
<mi>exp</mi>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mrow>
<mo>-</mo>
<mfrac>
<mrow>
<msup>
<msub>
<mi>gy</mi>
<mrow>
<mi>t</mi>
<mi>h</mi>
</mrow>
</msub>
<mn>2</mn>
</msup>
</mrow>
<msup>
<mi>&mu;</mi>
<mn>2</mn>
</msup>
</mfrac>
</mrow>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<mfrac>
<mrow>
<msup>
<mi>&alpha;&gamma;</mi>
<mn>2</mn>
</msup>
</mrow>
<mi>&beta;</mi>
</mfrac>
</mrow>
</mtd>
</mtr>
<mtr>
<mtd>
<mrow>
<mo>&times;</mo>
<munderover>
<mi>&Sigma;</mi>
<mrow>
<mi>i</mi>
<mo>=</mo>
<mn>1</mn>
</mrow>
<mi>n</mi>
</munderover>
<msub>
<mi>H</mi>
<mi>i</mi>
</msub>
<mi>exp</mi>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mfrac>
<mrow>
<mn>2</mn>
<msub>
<mi>y</mi>
<mrow>
<mi>t</mi>
<mi>h</mi>
</mrow>
</msub>
<msqrt>
<mrow>
<msub>
<mi>x</mi>
<mi>i</mi>
</msub>
<mi>g</mi>
</mrow>
</msqrt>
</mrow>
<mi>&mu;</mi>
</mfrac>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<msup>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mfrac>
<msqrt>
<msub>
<mi>x</mi>
<mi>i</mi>
</msub>
</msqrt>
<mrow>
<msub>
<mi>&eta;A</mi>
<mn>0</mn>
</msub>
<msqrt>
<mi>g</mi>
</msqrt>
</mrow>
</mfrac>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<msup>
<mi>&gamma;</mi>
<mn>2</mn>
</msup>
</msup>
<munderover>
<mi>&Sigma;</mi>
<mrow>
<mi>j</mi>
<mo>=</mo>
<mn>0</mn>
</mrow>
<mi>&infin;</mi>
</munderover>
<mfrac>
<mrow>
<mi>&Gamma;</mi>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mi>&alpha;</mi>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
</mrow>
<mrow>
<mi>&Gamma;</mi>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mrow>
<mi>&alpha;</mi>
<mo>-</mo>
<mi>j</mi>
</mrow>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
</mrow>
</mfrac>
<mfrac>
<msup>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mrow>
<mo>-</mo>
<mn>1</mn>
</mrow>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<mi>j</mi>
</msup>
<mrow>
<mi>j</mi>
<mo>!</mo>
<msup>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mrow>
<mn>1</mn>
<mo>+</mo>
<mi>j</mi>
</mrow>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<mrow>
<mn>1</mn>
<mo>-</mo>
<mfrac>
<msup>
<mi>&gamma;</mi>
<mn>2</mn>
</msup>
<mi>&beta;</mi>
</mfrac>
</mrow>
</msup>
</mrow>
</mfrac>
</mrow>
</mtd>
</mtr>
<mtr>
<mtd>
<mrow>
<mo>&times;</mo>
<msubsup>
<mi>G</mi>
<mrow>
<mn>1</mn>
<mo>,</mo>
<mn>2</mn>
</mrow>
<mrow>
<mn>2</mn>
<mo>,</mo>
<mn>0</mn>
</mrow>
</msubsup>
<mrow>
<mo>&lsqb;</mo>
<mrow>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mrow>
<mn>1</mn>
<mo>+</mo>
<mi>j</mi>
</mrow>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<msup>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mfrac>
<msqrt>
<msub>
<mi>x</mi>
<mi>i</mi>
</msub>
</msqrt>
<mrow>
<msub>
<mi>&eta;A</mi>
<mn>0</mn>
</msub>
<msqrt>
<mi>g</mi>
</msqrt>
</mrow>
</mfrac>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<mi>&beta;</mi>
</msup>
<mo>|</mo>
<mtable>
<mtr>
<mtd>
<mrow>
<mn>1</mn>
<mo>-</mo>
<mfrac>
<msup>
<mi>&gamma;</mi>
<mn>2</mn>
</msup>
<mi>&beta;</mi>
</mfrac>
<mo>,</mo>
<mn>1</mn>
</mrow>
</mtd>
</mtr>
<mtr>
<mtd>
<mrow>
<mn>0</mn>
<mo>,</mo>
<mn>1</mn>
<mo>-</mo>
<mfrac>
<msup>
<mi>&gamma;</mi>
<mn>2</mn>
</msup>
<mi>&beta;</mi>
</mfrac>
<mo>,</mo>
<mo>-</mo>
<mfrac>
<msup>
<mi>&gamma;</mi>
<mn>2</mn>
</msup>
<mi>&beta;</mi>
</mfrac>
</mrow>
</mtd>
</mtr>
</mtable>
</mrow>
<mo>&rsqb;</mo>
</mrow>
<msup>
<mo>}</mo>
<mi>M</mi>
</msup>
</mrow>
</mtd>
</mtr>
</mtable>
</mfenced>
In formula, HiIt is the weight in generalized Laguerre formula;xiFor i-th of Generalized Gaussian Laguerre polynomials;K is broad sense
The total item of Gauss Laguerre polynomials;
When 4b) using dynamic decision thresholding, for (N, M) MPPM, the probability correctly demodulated is Pc=(1-SLER)N, then erratum number
Rate is
<mrow>
<mtable>
<mtr>
<mtd>
<mrow>
<msub>
<mi>P</mi>
<mi>s</mi>
</msub>
<mo>=</mo>
<mn>1</mn>
<mo>-</mo>
<msub>
<mi>P</mi>
<mi>c</mi>
</msub>
</mrow>
</mtd>
</mtr>
<mtr>
<mtd>
<mrow>
<mo>=</mo>
<mn>1</mn>
<mo>-</mo>
<mfrac>
<mi>M</mi>
<mrow>
<mn>2</mn>
<mi>N</mi>
<msqrt>
<mi>&pi;</mi>
</msqrt>
</mrow>
</mfrac>
<munderover>
<mi>&Sigma;</mi>
<mrow>
<mi>i</mi>
<mo>=</mo>
<mn>1</mn>
</mrow>
<mi>n</mi>
</munderover>
<msub>
<mi>H</mi>
<mi>i</mi>
</msub>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mrow>
<mn>1</mn>
<mo>+</mo>
<mfrac>
<mn>1</mn>
<mrow>
<mn>4</mn>
<msub>
<mi>x</mi>
<mi>i</mi>
</msub>
</mrow>
</mfrac>
<mi>ln</mi>
<mfrac>
<mrow>
<mi>N</mi>
<mo>-</mo>
<mi>M</mi>
</mrow>
<mi>M</mi>
</mfrac>
</mrow>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<msup>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mfrac>
<mrow>
<mi>N</mi>
<mo>-</mo>
<mi>M</mi>
</mrow>
<mi>M</mi>
</mfrac>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<mrow>
<mfrac>
<mn>1</mn>
<mn>2</mn>
</mfrac>
<mo>-</mo>
<mfrac>
<mn>1</mn>
<mrow>
<mn>16</mn>
<msub>
<mi>x</mi>
<mi>i</mi>
</msub>
</mrow>
</mfrac>
<mi>ln</mi>
<mfrac>
<mrow>
<mi>N</mi>
<mo>-</mo>
<mi>M</mi>
</mrow>
<mi>M</mi>
</mfrac>
</mrow>
</msup>
<msup>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mfrac>
<mrow>
<mn>2</mn>
<msqrt>
<msub>
<mi>x</mi>
<mi>i</mi>
</msub>
</msqrt>
</mrow>
<mrow>
<msub>
<mi>&eta;A</mi>
<mn>0</mn>
</msub>
<msqrt>
<mi>g</mi>
</msqrt>
</mrow>
</mfrac>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<msup>
<mi>&gamma;</mi>
<mn>2</mn>
</msup>
</msup>
</mrow>
</mtd>
</mtr>
<mtr>
<mtd>
<mrow>
<mo>&times;</mo>
<mfrac>
<mrow>
<msup>
<mi>&alpha;&gamma;</mi>
<mn>2</mn>
</msup>
</mrow>
<mi>&beta;</mi>
</mfrac>
<munderover>
<mi>&Sigma;</mi>
<mrow>
<mi>j</mi>
<mo>=</mo>
<mn>0</mn>
</mrow>
<mi>&infin;</mi>
</munderover>
<mfrac>
<mrow>
<mi>&Gamma;</mi>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mi>&alpha;</mi>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
</mrow>
<mrow>
<mi>&Gamma;</mi>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mrow>
<mi>&alpha;</mi>
<mo>-</mo>
<mi>j</mi>
</mrow>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
</mrow>
</mfrac>
<mfrac>
<msup>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mrow>
<mo>-</mo>
<mn>1</mn>
</mrow>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<mi>j</mi>
</msup>
<mrow>
<mi>j</mi>
<mo>!</mo>
<msup>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mrow>
<mn>1</mn>
<mo>+</mo>
<mi>j</mi>
</mrow>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<mrow>
<mn>1</mn>
<mo>-</mo>
<mfrac>
<msup>
<mi>&gamma;</mi>
<mn>2</mn>
</msup>
<mi>&beta;</mi>
</mfrac>
</mrow>
</msup>
</mrow>
</mfrac>
<msubsup>
<mi>G</mi>
<mrow>
<mn>1</mn>
<mo>,</mo>
<mn>2</mn>
</mrow>
<mrow>
<mn>2</mn>
<mo>,</mo>
<mn>0</mn>
</mrow>
</msubsup>
<mrow>
<mo>&lsqb;</mo>
<mrow>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mrow>
<mn>1</mn>
<mo>+</mo>
<mi>j</mi>
</mrow>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<msup>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mfrac>
<mrow>
<mn>2</mn>
<msqrt>
<msub>
<mi>x</mi>
<mi>i</mi>
</msub>
</msqrt>
</mrow>
<mrow>
<msub>
<mi>&eta;A</mi>
<mn>0</mn>
</msub>
<msqrt>
<mi>g</mi>
</msqrt>
</mrow>
</mfrac>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<mi>&beta;</mi>
</msup>
<mo>|</mo>
<mtable>
<mtr>
<mtd>
<mrow>
<mn>1</mn>
<mo>-</mo>
<mfrac>
<msup>
<mi>&gamma;</mi>
<mn>2</mn>
</msup>
<mi>&beta;</mi>
</mfrac>
<mo>,</mo>
<mn>1</mn>
</mrow>
</mtd>
</mtr>
<mtr>
<mtd>
<mrow>
<mn>0</mn>
<mo>,</mo>
<mn>1</mn>
<mo>-</mo>
<mfrac>
<msup>
<mi>&gamma;</mi>
<mn>2</mn>
</msup>
<mi>&beta;</mi>
</mfrac>
<mo>,</mo>
<mo>-</mo>
<mfrac>
<msup>
<mi>&gamma;</mi>
<mn>2</mn>
</msup>
<mi>&beta;</mi>
</mfrac>
</mrow>
</mtd>
</mtr>
</mtable>
</mrow>
<mo>&rsqb;</mo>
</mrow>
</mrow>
</mtd>
</mtr>
<mtr>
<mtd>
<mrow>
<mo>-</mo>
<mfrac>
<mrow>
<mi>N</mi>
<mo>-</mo>
<mi>M</mi>
</mrow>
<mrow>
<mn>2</mn>
<mi>N</mi>
<msqrt>
<mi>&pi;</mi>
</msqrt>
</mrow>
</mfrac>
<munderover>
<mi>&Sigma;</mi>
<mrow>
<mi>i</mi>
<mo>=</mo>
<mn>1</mn>
</mrow>
<mi>n</mi>
</munderover>
<msub>
<mi>H</mi>
<mi>i</mi>
</msub>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mrow>
<mn>1</mn>
<mo>-</mo>
<mfrac>
<mn>1</mn>
<mrow>
<mn>4</mn>
<msub>
<mi>x</mi>
<mi>i</mi>
</msub>
</mrow>
</mfrac>
<mi>ln</mi>
<mfrac>
<mrow>
<mi>N</mi>
<mo>-</mo>
<mi>M</mi>
</mrow>
<mi>M</mi>
</mfrac>
</mrow>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<msup>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mfrac>
<mrow>
<mi>N</mi>
<mo>-</mo>
<mi>M</mi>
</mrow>
<mi>M</mi>
</mfrac>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<mrow>
<mo>-</mo>
<mfrac>
<mn>1</mn>
<mn>2</mn>
</mfrac>
<mo>-</mo>
<mfrac>
<mn>1</mn>
<mrow>
<mn>16</mn>
<msub>
<mi>x</mi>
<mi>i</mi>
</msub>
</mrow>
</mfrac>
<mi>ln</mi>
<mfrac>
<mrow>
<mi>N</mi>
<mo>-</mo>
<mi>M</mi>
</mrow>
<mi>M</mi>
</mfrac>
</mrow>
</msup>
<msup>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mfrac>
<mrow>
<mn>2</mn>
<msqrt>
<msub>
<mi>x</mi>
<mi>i</mi>
</msub>
</msqrt>
</mrow>
<mrow>
<msub>
<mi>&eta;A</mi>
<mn>0</mn>
</msub>
<msqrt>
<mi>g</mi>
</msqrt>
</mrow>
</mfrac>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<msup>
<mi>&gamma;</mi>
<mn>2</mn>
</msup>
</msup>
</mrow>
</mtd>
</mtr>
<mtr>
<mtd>
<mrow>
<mo>&times;</mo>
<mfrac>
<mrow>
<msup>
<mi>&alpha;&gamma;</mi>
<mn>2</mn>
</msup>
</mrow>
<mi>&beta;</mi>
</mfrac>
<munderover>
<mi>&Sigma;</mi>
<mrow>
<mi>j</mi>
<mo>=</mo>
<mn>0</mn>
</mrow>
<mi>&infin;</mi>
</munderover>
<mfrac>
<mrow>
<mi>&Gamma;</mi>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mi>&alpha;</mi>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
</mrow>
<mrow>
<mi>&Gamma;</mi>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mrow>
<mi>&alpha;</mi>
<mo>-</mo>
<mi>j</mi>
</mrow>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
</mrow>
</mfrac>
<mfrac>
<msup>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mrow>
<mo>-</mo>
<mn>1</mn>
</mrow>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<mi>j</mi>
</msup>
<mrow>
<mi>j</mi>
<mo>!</mo>
<msup>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mrow>
<mn>1</mn>
<mo>+</mo>
<mi>j</mi>
</mrow>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<mrow>
<mn>1</mn>
<mo>-</mo>
<mfrac>
<msup>
<mi>&gamma;</mi>
<mn>2</mn>
</msup>
<mi>&beta;</mi>
</mfrac>
</mrow>
</msup>
</mrow>
</mfrac>
<msubsup>
<mi>G</mi>
<mrow>
<mn>1</mn>
<mo>,</mo>
<mn>2</mn>
</mrow>
<mrow>
<mn>2</mn>
<mo>,</mo>
<mn>0</mn>
</mrow>
</msubsup>
<mrow>
<mo>&lsqb;</mo>
<mrow>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mrow>
<mn>1</mn>
<mo>+</mo>
<mi>j</mi>
</mrow>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<msup>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mfrac>
<mrow>
<mn>2</mn>
<msqrt>
<msub>
<mi>x</mi>
<mi>i</mi>
</msub>
</msqrt>
</mrow>
<mrow>
<msub>
<mi>&eta;A</mi>
<mn>0</mn>
</msub>
<msqrt>
<mi>g</mi>
</msqrt>
</mrow>
</mfrac>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
<mi>&beta;</mi>
</msup>
<mo>|</mo>
<mtable>
<mtr>
<mtd>
<mrow>
<mn>1</mn>
<mo>-</mo>
<mfrac>
<msup>
<mi>&gamma;</mi>
<mn>2</mn>
</msup>
<mi>&beta;</mi>
</mfrac>
<mo>,</mo>
<mn>1</mn>
</mrow>
</mtd>
</mtr>
<mtr>
<mtd>
<mrow>
<mn>0</mn>
<mo>,</mo>
<mn>1</mn>
<mo>-</mo>
<mfrac>
<msup>
<mi>&gamma;</mi>
<mn>2</mn>
</msup>
<mi>&beta;</mi>
</mfrac>
<mo>,</mo>
<mo>-</mo>
<mfrac>
<msup>
<mi>&gamma;</mi>
<mn>2</mn>
</msup>
<mi>&beta;</mi>
</mfrac>
</mrow>
</mtd>
</mtr>
</mtable>
</mrow>
<mo>&rsqb;</mo>
</mrow>
</mrow>
</mtd>
</mtr>
</mtable>
<mo>.</mo>
</mrow>
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201710814265.9A CN107645335B (en) | 2017-09-11 | 2017-09-11 | MPPM-FSO system based on EW composite channel model demodulates error sign ratio calculation method firmly |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201710814265.9A CN107645335B (en) | 2017-09-11 | 2017-09-11 | MPPM-FSO system based on EW composite channel model demodulates error sign ratio calculation method firmly |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN107645335A true CN107645335A (en) | 2018-01-30 |
CN107645335B CN107645335B (en) | 2019-06-11 |
Family
ID=61110164
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN201710814265.9A Active CN107645335B (en) | 2017-09-11 | 2017-09-11 | MPPM-FSO system based on EW composite channel model demodulates error sign ratio calculation method firmly |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN107645335B (en) |
Cited By (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN109302232A (en) * | 2018-10-26 | 2019-02-01 | 西安电子科技大学 | Underwater wireless optical communication system error rate calculation method based on parallel multi-hop framework |
CN111431601A (en) * | 2020-05-12 | 2020-07-17 | 南京邮电大学 | Method for improving system channel utilization rate |
CN111525952A (en) * | 2020-04-14 | 2020-08-11 | 兰州理工大学 | Simplified calculation method for average capacity of FTN-WOC system in turbulent flow channel |
CN111682900A (en) * | 2020-05-29 | 2020-09-18 | 中山大学 | Decision threshold value design method of marine wireless optical communication MIMO system |
CN112468229A (en) * | 2020-11-17 | 2021-03-09 | 西安理工大学 | Atmospheric turbulence channel fading parameter estimation method based on mixed distribution model |
CN114629549A (en) * | 2022-03-14 | 2022-06-14 | 西安电子科技大学 | Bit error rate calculation method of intelligent reflecting surface assisted FSO (frequency selective optical) system based on partially coherent light |
Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20160119059A1 (en) * | 2014-10-22 | 2016-04-28 | Indian Institute Of Technology Delhi | System and a method for free space optical communications |
CN105897626A (en) * | 2016-04-12 | 2016-08-24 | 西安电子科技大学 | MPPM modulation soft demodulation algorithm and symbol error rate performance estimation method |
CN106685523A (en) * | 2016-12-12 | 2017-05-17 | 西安电子科技大学 | Index Weber and APD based error rate calculating method of PPM wireless optical communication system |
CN106972888A (en) * | 2017-03-28 | 2017-07-21 | 北京拉酷网络科技有限公司 | Utilize the method and system of light transmission information |
-
2017
- 2017-09-11 CN CN201710814265.9A patent/CN107645335B/en active Active
Patent Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20160119059A1 (en) * | 2014-10-22 | 2016-04-28 | Indian Institute Of Technology Delhi | System and a method for free space optical communications |
CN105897626A (en) * | 2016-04-12 | 2016-08-24 | 西安电子科技大学 | MPPM modulation soft demodulation algorithm and symbol error rate performance estimation method |
CN106685523A (en) * | 2016-12-12 | 2017-05-17 | 西安电子科技大学 | Index Weber and APD based error rate calculating method of PPM wireless optical communication system |
CN106972888A (en) * | 2017-03-28 | 2017-07-21 | 北京拉酷网络科技有限公司 | Utilize the method and system of light transmission information |
Non-Patent Citations (2)
Title |
---|
PING WANG 等: "Performance Analysis for Relay-Aided Multihop BPPM FSO Communication System Over Exponentiated Weibull Fading Channels With Pointing Error Impairments", 《IEEE PHOTONICS JOURNAL》 * |
杨本圣: "基于MPPM无线光通信系统在湍流信道下的误符号率性能研究", 《中国优秀硕士学位论文全文数据库 信息科技辑》 * |
Cited By (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN109302232A (en) * | 2018-10-26 | 2019-02-01 | 西安电子科技大学 | Underwater wireless optical communication system error rate calculation method based on parallel multi-hop framework |
CN111525952A (en) * | 2020-04-14 | 2020-08-11 | 兰州理工大学 | Simplified calculation method for average capacity of FTN-WOC system in turbulent flow channel |
CN111525952B (en) * | 2020-04-14 | 2022-12-13 | 兰州理工大学 | Simplified calculation method for average capacity of FTN-WOC system in turbulent flow channel |
CN111431601A (en) * | 2020-05-12 | 2020-07-17 | 南京邮电大学 | Method for improving system channel utilization rate |
CN111682900A (en) * | 2020-05-29 | 2020-09-18 | 中山大学 | Decision threshold value design method of marine wireless optical communication MIMO system |
CN111682900B (en) * | 2020-05-29 | 2021-07-09 | 中山大学 | Decision threshold value design method of marine wireless optical communication MIMO system |
CN112468229A (en) * | 2020-11-17 | 2021-03-09 | 西安理工大学 | Atmospheric turbulence channel fading parameter estimation method based on mixed distribution model |
CN114629549A (en) * | 2022-03-14 | 2022-06-14 | 西安电子科技大学 | Bit error rate calculation method of intelligent reflecting surface assisted FSO (frequency selective optical) system based on partially coherent light |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN107645335B (en) | 2019-06-11 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN107645335B (en) | MPPM-FSO system based on EW composite channel model demodulates error sign ratio calculation method firmly | |
US11943737B2 (en) | Systems, methods, and devices for electronic spectrum management for identifying signal-emitting devices | |
AU643727B2 (en) | Error rate monitor | |
Yan et al. | Derivative-based signal detection for high data rate molecular communication system | |
CN108683526B (en) | Method for identifying competitive MAC protocol | |
US10972141B2 (en) | Method for estimating arrival time based on noise cancellation | |
CN108632186A (en) | The digital information detection method of environmental signal backscatter system based on MFSK modulation | |
CN107819548B (en) | The symbol detection method of environment backscatter system based on Manchester's code | |
CN102158283A (en) | Method for suppressing atmospheric noise in wireless optical-communication modulated by subcarriers | |
CN104065430A (en) | Method for cooperative spectrum detection based on node recognition | |
CN110289926B (en) | Spectrum sensing method based on symmetric peak values of cyclic autocorrelation function of modulation signal | |
CN104734793B (en) | The energy detection method of wireless cooperation frequency spectrum perception based on p powers | |
Farsad et al. | Neural network detectors for molecular communication systems | |
CN103379049A (en) | Wireless optical communication channel estimation and soft-demodulation method by using 4PPM digital modulation mode | |
CN115396270B (en) | Frequency modulation signal time-frequency synchronization system and method based on data type identification | |
CN102158254A (en) | Method and device for receiving signal | |
CN107196883B (en) | Alpha Stable distritation noisy fading channel digital modulation signal recognizing method | |
Liu et al. | Probability‐based fusion rule in cooperative spectrum sensing with impact of geographic location | |
Tsymbaliuk et al. | APPROACH TO PROCESSING RADIO SIGNALS WITH AMPLITUDE MODULATION OF MANY COMPONENTS USING ONEDIMENSIONAL CONVOLUTIONAL NEURAL NETWORK. | |
Wu et al. | RangingNet: A convolutional deep neural network based ranging model for wireless sensor networks (WSN) | |
Wang et al. | MoSeFi: Duration Estimation Robust Human Motion Sensing via Commodity WiFi Device | |
Huang et al. | Importance Sampling Based EM Algorithm for Sequence Detection in Outdoor OWC Systems | |
Jahanshahi et al. | Utilizing support vector machine and fuzzy C-means algorithms in the base station for jamming detection | |
Hu | Optimising signal detection techniques in wireless ultraviolet communication systems | |
CN112597951B (en) | KD-based signal countermeasure sample detection method |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PB01 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
OL01 | Intention to license declared | ||
OL01 | Intention to license declared |