CN107608803B - Social D2D relay selection method - Google Patents

Social D2D relay selection method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN107608803B
CN107608803B CN201710824227.1A CN201710824227A CN107608803B CN 107608803 B CN107608803 B CN 107608803B CN 201710824227 A CN201710824227 A CN 201710824227A CN 107608803 B CN107608803 B CN 107608803B
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
vue
rue
social
qos
relay
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
CN201710824227.1A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN107608803A (en
Inventor
江明
吴宽
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Sun Yat Sen University
SYSU CMU Shunde International Joint Research Institute
Original Assignee
Sun Yat Sen University
SYSU CMU Shunde International Joint Research Institute
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Sun Yat Sen University, SYSU CMU Shunde International Joint Research Institute filed Critical Sun Yat Sen University
Priority to CN201710824227.1A priority Critical patent/CN107608803B/en
Publication of CN107608803A publication Critical patent/CN107608803A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN107608803B publication Critical patent/CN107608803B/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Information Retrieval, Db Structures And Fs Structures Therefor (AREA)
  • Information Transfer Between Computers (AREA)

Abstract

The invention provides a social D2D relay selection method, which is used for preprocessing input data to obtain data of a required type; performing index, namely target decision weight generation calculation on the obtained data; and converting and integrating the obtained single target output quantity and the QoS condition, and solving through a distributed message transmission mechanism to obtain a final output result. The algorithm is based on the combination of a modified IFAHP method and an entropy weight method, converts a multi-objective optimization problem into a single-objective optimization problem, further converts an expression of a quality of service condition, and further solves a D2D UE-NW relay selection result in a distributed mode through a proper message passing algorithm. The invention combines the subjective preference of the VUE with hesitation degree and the objective information decision weight for consideration, thereby leading the relay selection result to obtain more comprehensive performance improvement and having higher equipment access proportion, throughput and system fairness.

Description

Social D2D relay selection method
Technical Field
The invention relates to the field of mobile communication, in particular to a social D2D relay selection method.
Background
The D2D communication technology enables direct communication between User Equipments (UEs) without transmission or forwarding through a base station (eNB) or other devices, thereby achieving the purposes of reducing eNB load and expanding communication coverage.
UE-NW (UE-to-Network) relay is a new feature introduced by 3GPP LTE standards-making group in the D2D communication issue, has the advantage of flexible deployment, and can expand the Network coverage range without increasing the existing Network devices, so that it can be widely applied to the fields of commercial communication, public safety communication (such as earthquake, war), etc. As shown in fig. 1, a typical D2D UE-NW system includes one eNB, several Relay user equipments Relay UEs (RUEs), and several Victim UEs (VUEs, i.e., UEs requiring D2D Relay connection service). The eNB and RUE are connected via a cellular communication link, while the RUE and VUE are connected via a 3GPP specified D2D communication-dedicated sidelink. VUEs can be further divided into two types: In-Coverage VUE (IC VUE) within the Coverage of the cellular network, Out-of-Coverage VUE (OOC VUE) outside the Coverage of the cellular network.
Although the D2D UE-NW relay communication technique has the above advantages, the existing solution still has a problem of how to effectively perform the D2D relay selection function based on the conclusion that the existing 3GPP specifications are satisfied. Among these, one key issue is to perform D2D relay selection under multi-objective optimization based on what criteria and methods. In the conclusion formed in 2015 by the 3GPP RAN2 working group, the following requirements were proposed: "the VUE-selected relay UE needs to satisfy both the best link quality and other conditions specified by higher layers".
Meanwhile, with the development of social networking technology, the D2D UE increasingly presents the social attributes of the holder. The higher the social similarity between UEs, the higher the trust level, i.e. the higher the connection security. In addition, a high social similarity also often means that the VUE is more likely to retrieve interesting data content from socially close UEs. Thus, the social connection attribute of D2D has gained increasing research attention.
However, the prior art methods all suffer from different degrees of design deficiencies. In the prior art, a cluster and a corresponding cluster head with minimum time-frequency resource consumption under a reliable retransmission mechanism are obtained by iteratively updating the maximum reachable broadcast rate of a D2D link in the cluster. However, this approach ignores the social connection properties presented by D2D devices and is computationally prohibitive. In the prior art, a D2D relay selection scheme combining social and physical connection attributes is proposed, but all the schemes are executed under the assumption that the social and physical connection attributes have the same processing priority, and do not necessarily accord with the actual application scenario. On the other hand, the methods are optimization schemes under a single objective, and the situation of multi-objective optimization is not considered, so that the access performance of the UE-NW system is improved and simplified.
In addition to the above single optimization objective scheme, a multi-objective D2D relay selection scheme based on the combination of Complementary Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (CFAHP) and Mahalanobis Distance (MD) has been proposed in the prior art. However, multiple targets in this scheme do not contain social attributes. In addition, the scheme relies on subjective judgment brought by CFAHP, and ignores the favorable decision information for relay selection, which can be provided by objective data. Meanwhile, the CFAHP method is performed without considering the psychological characteristic of hesitation in the subjective fuzzy judgment of the UE. On the other hand, this approach fails to distinguish between different treatment strategies for revenue-type and attrition-type indicators.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention provides a social D2D relay selection method for improving the probability of acquiring data of a target type.
In order to achieve the technical effects, the technical scheme of the invention is as follows:
a social D2D relay selection method, comprising the steps of:
s1: preprocessing input data to obtain data of a required type;
s2: performing index, namely target decision weight generation calculation on the data in the S1;
s3: and converting and integrating the single target output quantity obtained in the S2 and the QoS condition, and solving through a distributed message transmission mechanism to obtain a final output result.
Further, the specific process of step S1 is:
let the relay user equipment RUE form a set R ═ { R ═ R1,R2,...,RNN is the number of candidate relay user equipment RUE; user equipment VUE of relay connection service forms set V ═ { V ═ V-1,v2,...,vMM is the number of VUE;
the indexes of the method which need to carry out decision weight generation calculation are as follows:
link capacity between VUE v and RUE r
Figure GDA0002699743900000021
Social similarity between VUE v and RUE r Sv,r: the social attribute is described by a Jacard coefficient and is defined as the proportion of the common social attribute owned by the VUE v and the RUE r to the total social attribute;
buffer size beta of RUE r endr
VUE v acquires consumption C required for RUE r relay servicev,r: in IC scenarios, the cost required to implement relay services for VUE-excited RUEs; in an OOC scenario, the power consumption of the VUE itself is assumed;
the multiple targets form a target set of VUE v ends
Figure GDA0002699743900000031
The capacity, the social similarity and the cache size of the RUE end are gain indexes, and the higher the numerical value is, the better the numerical value is; on the other hand, the consumption is a loss index, and the lower the value is, the better the value is;
at the same time, a binary selection variable X is definedv,rTo indicate whether VUE v selects a candidate RUE r:
Figure GDA0002699743900000032
in addition to the above multiple targets, the indexes to be calculated for generating decision weight include:
QoS conditions required by the VUE end for each index;
acceptance of the RUE end, i.e. maximum number of accessible VUs Kr
Each VUE can only access one unique RUE;
based on the above, the optimization model of the solution required by the method is as follows:
max{P1,P2,P3,-P4} (2)
the model is limited to:
Figure GDA0002699743900000033
wherein:
Figure GDA0002699743900000034
Figure GDA0002699743900000035
Sv,threshv,thresh,Cv,threshcapacity QoS thresholds, social similarity QoS thresholds, cache QoS thresholds, and consumption QoS thresholds of the VUE v end, respectively.
Further, the specific process of step S2 includes performing subjective preference decision weight generation and objective decision weight generation;
the subjective preference decision weight generation comprises the following steps:
1) constructing a visual fuzzy preference relationship;
2) constructing a perfect multiplicative consistency visual fuzzy relation matrix;
3) generating visual fuzzy numerical weight;
4) generating a definite number ranking value
5) Normalizing the ranking values to generate output subjective preference weights
Figure GDA0002699743900000045
Namely the subjective preference weight corresponding to the ith index of the VUE v end;
the objective decision weight generation comprises the steps of:
1) inputting all index values of all candidate RUEs;
2) data preprocessing;
3) obtaining objective decision weight by an entropy weight method;
4) processing a result obtained by integrating the subjective preference decision weight to generate a single target relative approximation degree sequence T of an output VUE v endv
Further, the specific process of step S3 is:
through gammavConverting the original optimization problem model into a new optimization model with the minimum sum of solving single-target relative approximation RPD:
Figure GDA0002699743900000041
limited by: C1-C6 (6)
Since this optimization model containing QoS threshold conditions cannot be solved directly by existing distributed messaging algorithms, to further solve the optimization problem (5), the following indicators are introduced:
Figure GDA0002699743900000042
further, combining the objectives of (7) and (4), the following transformation model is obtained:
Figure GDA0002699743900000043
limited by:
Figure GDA0002699743900000044
wherein C7 is a new condition introduced to ensure that (8) and (5) are mathematically equivalent, the objective function for models (8), (5) has been combined with QoS threshold conditions such that the solution of (8) is semantically equivalent to solving for relay selection results that can simultaneously satisfy the minimum RPD and satisfy all QoS threshold conditions, since in practical communication systems condition C7 is difficult to be fully satisfied in a binary selection problem under this type of QoS constraint, C7 is omitted for model solution with distributed messaging mechanisms, to solve for (8) the desired output result, and in order to solve for (8) with distributed messaging mechanisms, the message from RUE end to e end is redefined in the tth iteration of VUE end to e end
Figure GDA0002699743900000051
And the message from the VUE end to the RUE end is
Figure GDA0002699743900000052
Where ω is a predefined damping coefficient that ensures algorithm convergence,
Figure GDA0002699743900000053
the constituent set V of VUs represents the Kth in the Vth remaining subset of VUs (i.e., V/{ V }) that is deletedrA minimum message size of 0 < Kr≤M,Kr∈Z+Is a predefined parameter;
because the type of the solution objective in (8) is the minimum optimization summation, correspondingly, the invention sets the solution objective of the distributed message transfer mechanism as the sum of the minimum message quantity to obtain the final iteration output:
Figure GDA0002699743900000054
compared with the prior art, the technical scheme of the invention has the beneficial effects that:
the method comprises the steps of preprocessing input data to obtain data of a required type; performing index, namely target decision weight generation calculation on the obtained data; and converting and integrating the obtained single target output quantity and the QoS condition, and solving through a distributed message transmission mechanism to obtain a final output result. The algorithm is based on the combination of a Modified IFAHP (Modified IFAHP, MIFAHP) method and an entropy weight method, converts a multi-objective optimization problem into a single-objective optimization problem, further converts an expression of Quality of Service (QoS) conditions, and further solves the D2D UE-NW relay selection result in a distributed manner through a proper message transfer algorithm. The invention combines the subjective preference of the VUE band hesitation degree and the objective information decision weight for consideration, thereby leading the D2D UE-NW relay selection result to obtain more comprehensive performance improvement. Meanwhile, compared with the existing scheme, the method has higher equipment access ratio, higher throughput and higher system fairness, and is more suitable for the practical D2D UE-NW communication system.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a typical D2D UE-NW system;
FIG. 2 is a basic process flow of the present invention;
FIG. 3 is a flow chart based on a Modified IFAHP Method (MIFAHP);
FIG. 4 is a flowchart of a target weight generation algorithm combining the IFAHP method and the entropy weight method;
FIG. 5 is a flow diagram of a solution over a distributed messaging mechanism;
fig. 6 is an IC scenario access ratio vs capacity QoS threshold;
FIG. 7 is an IC scene access ratio vs social similarity QoS threshold;
FIG. 8 is an IC scenario access ratio vs. consumption QoS threshold;
fig. 9 is an IC scenario access ratio vs cache size QoS threshold;
fig. 10 is an IC scenario access ratio vs full QoS threshold;
fig. 11 is an OOC scenario access ratio vs capacity QoS threshold;
FIG. 12 is an OOC scenario access ratio vs social similarity QoS threshold;
fig. 13 is an OOC scenario access ratio vs consumption QoS threshold;
fig. 14 is an OOC scenario access ratio vs cache QoS threshold;
fig. 15 is an OOC scenario access ratio vs full QoS threshold;
FIG. 16 is an IC scenario throughput vs full QoS threshold;
FIG. 17 is an IC scenario system fairness vs. full QoS threshold;
FIG. 18 is an OOC scenario throughput vs full QoS threshold;
fig. 19 is OOC scenario system fairness vs full QoS threshold.
Detailed Description
The drawings are for illustrative purposes only and are not to be construed as limiting the patent;
for the purpose of better illustrating the embodiments, certain features of the drawings may be omitted, enlarged or reduced, and do not represent the size of an actual product;
it will be understood by those skilled in the art that certain well-known structures in the drawings and descriptions thereof may be omitted.
The technical solution of the present invention is further described below with reference to the accompanying drawings and examples.
Example 1
A social D2D relay selection method, comprising the steps of:
s1: preprocessing input data to obtain data of a required type;
s2: performing index, namely target decision weight generation calculation on the data in the S1;
s3: and converting and integrating the single target output quantity obtained in the S2 and the QoS condition, and solving through a distributed message transmission mechanism to obtain a final output result.
Further, the specific process of step S1 is:
let the relay user equipment RUE form a set R ═ { R ═ R1,R2,...,RNN is the number of candidate relay user equipment RUE; user equipment VUE of relay connection service forms set V ═ { V ═ V-1,v2,...,vMM is the number of VUE;
the indexes of the method which need to carry out decision weight generation calculation are as follows:
link capacity between VUE v and RUE r
Figure GDA0002699743900000071
Social similarity between VUE v and RUE r Sv,r: the social attribute is described by a Jacard coefficient and is defined as the proportion of the common social attribute owned by the VUE v and the RUE r to the total social attribute;
buffer size beta of RUE r endr
VUE v acquires consumption C required for RUE r relay servicev,r: in IC scenarios, the cost required to implement relay services for VUE-excited RUEs; in an OOC scenario, the power consumption of the VUE itself is assumed;
the multiple targets form a target set of VUE v ends
Figure GDA0002699743900000072
The capacity, the social similarity and the cache size of the RUE end are gain indexes, and the higher the numerical value is, the better the numerical value is; on the other hand, the consumption is a loss index, and the lower the value is, the better the value is;
at the same time, a binary selection variable X is definedv,rTo indicate whether VUE v selects a candidate RUE r:
Figure GDA0002699743900000073
in addition to the above multiple targets, the indexes to be calculated for generating decision weight include:
QoS conditions required by the VUE end for each index;
acceptance of the RUE end, i.e. maximum number of accessible VUs Kr
Each VUE can only access one unique RUE;
based on the above, the optimization model of the solution required by the method is as follows:
max{P1,P2,P3,-P4} (2)
the model is limited to:
Figure GDA0002699743900000074
wherein:
Figure GDA0002699743900000081
Figure GDA0002699743900000082
Sv,threshv,thresh,Cv,threshcapacity QoS thresholds, social similarity QoS thresholds, cache QoS thresholds, and consumption QoS thresholds of the VUE v end, respectively.
Further, the specific process of step S2 includes performing subjective preference decision weight generation and objective decision weight generation;
the subjective preference decision weight generation comprises the following steps:
1) constructing a visual fuzzy preference relationship;
2) constructing a perfect multiplicative consistency visual fuzzy relation matrix;
3) generating visual fuzzy numerical weight;
4) generating a definite number ranking value
5) Normalizing the ranking values to generate output subjective preference weights
Figure GDA0002699743900000084
Namely the subjective preference weight corresponding to the ith index of the VUE v end;
the objective decision weight generation comprises the steps of:
1) inputting all index values of all candidate RUEs;
2) data preprocessing;
3) obtaining objective decision weight by an entropy weight method;
4) processing a result obtained by integrating the subjective preference decision weight to generate a single target relative approximation degree sequence T of an output VUE v endv
Further, the specific process of step S3 is:
through gammavConverting the original optimization problem modelFor solving the new optimization model with the minimum sum of relative approximation degrees RPD of the single target:
Figure GDA0002699743900000083
limited by: C1-C6 (6)
Since this optimization model containing QoS threshold conditions cannot be solved directly by existing distributed messaging algorithms, to further solve the optimization problem (5), the following indicators are introduced:
Figure GDA0002699743900000091
further, combining the objectives of (7) and (4), the following transformation model is obtained:
Figure GDA0002699743900000092
limited by:
Figure GDA0002699743900000093
wherein C7 is a new condition introduced to ensure that (8) and (5) are mathematically equivalent, the objective function for models (8), (5) has been combined with QoS threshold conditions such that the solution of (8) is semantically equivalent to solving for relay selection results that can simultaneously satisfy the minimum RPD and satisfy all QoS threshold conditions, since in practical communication systems condition C7 is difficult to be fully satisfied in a binary selection problem under this type of QoS constraint, C7 is omitted for model solution with distributed messaging mechanisms, to solve for (8) the desired output result, and in order to solve for (8) with distributed messaging mechanisms, the message from RUE end to e end is redefined in the tth iteration of VUE end to e end
Figure GDA0002699743900000094
And the message from the VUE end to the RUE end is
Figure GDA0002699743900000095
Where ω is a predefined damping coefficient that ensures algorithm convergence,
Figure GDA0002699743900000096
the constituent set V of VUs represents the Kth in the Vth remaining subset of VUs (i.e., V/{ V }) that is deletedrA minimum message size of 0 < Kr≤M,Kr∈Z+Is a predefined parameter;
because the type of the solution objective in (8) is the minimum optimization summation, correspondingly, the invention sets the solution objective of the distributed message transfer mechanism as the sum of the minimum message quantity to obtain the final iteration output:
Figure GDA0002699743900000097
to more fully illustrate the advantages of the present invention, the following description is provided to further illustrate the effectiveness and advancement of the invention, in connection with the following detailed description and related simulation results and analyses.
Assume that the system consists of one eNB, 10 randomly and uniformly distributed D2D RUEs and 30 randomly and uniformly distributed VUEs. Wherein, the maximum accessible VUE number K of each RUE endrHas a value of [4,6 ]]Are uniformly randomly generated. In practical application, KrThe specific value of (a) may be determined by the RUE according to its own condition (remaining power, security, sharing will of the user, etc.), and reported to the eNB. The VUE is further classified into IC VUE and OOC VUE according to whether coverage is available or not. The D2D link is described by a large scale loss plus a small scale fading channel. For convenience of description, the horizontal axis of the coordinates has a value of 0.5 representing the average of the index QoS values of all the candidate RUEs, and then 0.4 represents the average of 80%, and 0.6 represents the average of all the candidate RUEsAverage of 120%. The embodiment uses CRAWDA upb/hyccups (v.2016-10-17) real social network experimental data to simulate social similarity index values.
The present USARA scheme will be compared to the aforementioned typical D2D UE-NW relay selection scheme, namely: maximum Physical link capacity (Max Physical), maximum Physical link capacity (Max Physical Max Social, MPMS), Hybrid Selection Scheme (HRS), and complementary fuzzy hierarchy analysis-mahalanobis distance method (FAHP-M). In order to realize the contrast, in the simulation test, the minimum physical distance target in the MPMS method and the HRS method is equivalently converted into the maximum capacity target.
At the system input, a typical subjective fuzzy decision ordering (from high to low) is set as follows:
■ IC scenario: capacity → social similarity → consumption → cache size;
■ OOC scenario: capacity → consumption → cache size → social similarity.
As previously described, in IC scenarios, "consumption" is defined as the cost required by the VUE to excite the RUE to perform relay services; in an OOC scenario, "consumption" is defined as the power consumption of the VUE itself.
For the MIFAHP method and the FAHP-M method proposed by the invention, the implementation needs to input a predefined typical visual fuzzy input matrix and a complementary fuzzy input matrix. An example of these matrices is given in tables 1 and 2. In an actual system, the values of the elements in the matrix are selected according to the network condition.
TABLE 1 typical visual fuzzy input matrix required for MIFAHP method
(a) IC scene
Index (I) Capacity of Social similarity Consumption of Cache size
Capacity of (0.5,0.5) (0.6,0.2) (0.7,0.1) (0.8,0.1)
Social similarity (0.2,0.6) (0.5,0.5) (0.6,0.2) (0.7,0.1)
Consumption of (0.1,0.7) (0.2,0.6) (0.5,0.5) (0.6,0.2)
Cache size (0.1,0.8) (0.1,0.7) (0.2,0.6) (0.5,0.5)
(b) OOC scenario
Index (I) Capacity of Social similarity Consumption of Cache size
Capacity of (0.5,0.5) (0.9,0.1) (0.6,0.2) (0.7,0.1)
Social similarity (0.1,0.9) (0.5,0.5) (0.1,0.7) (0.2,0.6)
Consumption of (0.2,0.6) (0.7,0.1) (0.5,0.5) (0.7,0.1)
Cache size (0.1,0.7) (0.6,0.2) (0.1,0.7) (0.5,0.5)
TABLE 2 typical complementary fuzzy input matrix required for FAHP-M method
(a) IC scene
Index (I) Capacity of Social similarity Consumption of Cache size
Capacity of 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8
Social similarity 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7
Consumption of 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6
Cache size 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
(b) OOC scenario
Index (I) Capacity of Social similarity Consumption of Cache size
Capacity of 0.5 0.9 0.6 0.7
Social similarity 0.1 0.5 0.1 0.2
Consumption of 0.4 0.9 0.5 0.7
Cache size 0.3 0.8 0.3 0.5
In fig. 6 to 9 and fig. 11 to 14, to examine one type of index, the QoS threshold is changed as an argument, and the values of the other indexes are fixed at 0.5; in fig. 9 and 14, the QoS thresholds (All thresholds) of All types of metrics are All varied as arguments. When the QoS threshold is lowered, the VUE access threshold is lowered and thus the access ratio of all schemes is increased. When the QoS threshold value is the lowest, the access proportion of each scheme reaches the maximum. As can be seen from fig. 5-14, the Proposed scheme (i.e. the deployed curves in each figure) can achieve a higher access ratio than all other schemes. This is because the solution simultaneously takes the minimum RPD and the QoS indicator phi, so that the system can obtain the ideal weighting values of all the indicators as much as possible and satisfy the QoS conditions of all the indicators as much as possible. In contrast, none of the other existing solutions can simultaneously satisfy both of the above objects.
The invention tests the throughput rate and the fairness of the system. As can be seen from fig. 16 to fig. 19, the USARA scheme proposed by the present invention can achieve higher system throughput and fairness than the existing schemes. Wherein, the advantage of the throughput rate directly benefits from the high access ratio performance of the scheme. In addition, the optimization process of the USARA scheme considers the QoS conditions of all the type indexes, rather than focusing on the QoS conditions of only a single or partial type index, thereby enabling the system to achieve higher fairness.
Particularly, compared with the FAHP-M, the scheme refers to the VUE subjective preference weight and also performs more comprehensive RUE relay selection judgment by means of the objective decision weight provided by the index data. In addition, in the data normalization preprocessing stage, different processing modes are adopted for the gain type indexes and the loss type indexes so as to reflect preference trends of different types of indexes.
The same or similar reference numerals correspond to the same or similar parts;
the positional relationships depicted in the drawings are for illustrative purposes only and are not to be construed as limiting the present patent;
it should be understood that the above-described embodiments of the present invention are merely examples for clearly illustrating the present invention, and are not intended to limit the embodiments of the present invention. Other variations and modifications will be apparent to persons skilled in the art in light of the above description. And are neither required nor exhaustive of all embodiments. Any modification, equivalent replacement, and improvement made within the spirit and principle of the present invention should be included in the protection scope of the claims of the present invention.

Claims (1)

1. A social D2D relay selection method is characterized by comprising the following steps:
s1: preprocessing input data to obtain data of a required type;
s2: performing index, namely target decision weight generation calculation on the data in the S1;
s3: converting and integrating the single target output quantity obtained in the S2 and the QoS condition, and further solving through a distributed message transmission mechanism to obtain a final output result;
the specific process of step S1 is:
let the relay user equipment RUE form a set R ═ { R ═ R1,R2,...,RNN is the number of candidate relay user equipment RUE; user equipment VUE of relay connection service forms set V ═ { V ═ V-1,v2,...,vMM is the number of VUE;
the indexes of the method which need to carry out decision weight generation calculation are as follows:
link capacity between VUE v and RUE r
Figure FDA0002699743890000011
Social similarity between VUE v and RUE r Sv,r: the social attribute is described by a Jacard coefficient and is defined as the proportion of the common social attribute owned by the VUE v and the RUE r to the total social attribute;
buffer size beta of RUE r endr
VUE v acquires consumption C required for RUE r relay servicev,r: in IC scenarios, the cost required to implement relay services for VUE-excited RUEs; in an OOC scenario, the power consumption of the VUE itself is assumed;
the multiple targets form a target set of VUE v ends
Figure FDA0002699743890000012
The capacity, the social similarity and the cache size of the RUE end are gain indexes, and the higher the numerical value is, the better the numerical value is; on the other hand, the consumption is a loss index, and the lower the value is, the better the value is;
at the same time, a binary selection variable X is definedv,rTo indicate whether VUE v selects a candidate RUE r:
Figure FDA0002699743890000013
in addition to the above multiple targets, the indexes to be calculated for generating decision weight include:
QoS conditions required by the VUE end for each index;
acceptance of the RUE end, i.e. maximum number of accessible VUs Kr
Each VUE can only access one unique RUE;
based on the above, the optimization model of the solution required by the method is as follows:
max{P1,P2,P3,-P4} (2)
the model is limited to:
Figure FDA0002699743890000021
wherein:
Figure FDA0002699743890000022
Figure FDA0002699743890000023
Sv,threshv,thresh,Cv,threshcapacity QoS threshold, social similarity QoS threshold, cache QoS threshold and consumption QoS threshold of a VUE v end respectively;
the specific process of step S2 includes performing subjective preference decision weight generation and objective decision weight generation;
the subjective preference decision weight generation comprises the following steps:
1) constructing a visual fuzzy preference relationship;
2) constructing a perfect multiplicative consistency visual fuzzy relation matrix;
3) generating visual fuzzy numerical weight;
4) generating a determined number sequencing numerical value;
5) normalizing the ranking values to generate an output subjective preference weight λ'i ,vI.e. the subjective preference weight corresponding to the ith index of the VUE v end;
the objective decision weight generation comprises the steps of:
1) inputting all index values of all candidate RUEs;
2) data preprocessing;
3) obtaining objective decision weight by an entropy weight method;
4) processing a result obtained by integrating the subjective preference decision weight to generate a single target relative approximation degree sequence T of an output VUE v endv
The specific process of step S3 is:
through gammavConverting the original optimization problem model into a new optimization model with the minimum sum of solving single-target relative approximation RPD:
Figure FDA0002699743890000024
limited by: C1-C6 (6)
Since this optimization model containing QoS threshold conditions cannot be solved directly by existing distributed messaging algorithms, to further solve the optimization problem (5), the following indicators are introduced:
Figure FDA0002699743890000031
further, combining the objectives of (7) and (4), the following transformation model is obtained:
Figure FDA0002699743890000032
limited by:
Figure FDA0002699743890000033
wherein C7 is a new condition introduced to ensure that (8) and (5) are mathematically equivalent, the objective function for models (8), (5) has been combined with QoS threshold conditions such that the solution of (8) is semantically equivalent to solving for relay selection results that can simultaneously satisfy the minimum RPD and satisfy all QoS threshold conditions, since in practical communication systems condition C7 is difficult to be fully satisfied in a binary selection problem under this type of QoS constraint, C7 is omitted for model solution with distributed messaging mechanisms, to solve for (8) the desired output result, and in order to solve for (8) with distributed messaging mechanisms, the message from RUE end to e end is redefined in the tth iteration of VUE end to e end
Figure FDA0002699743890000034
And the message from the VUE end to the RUE end is
Figure FDA0002699743890000035
Where ω is a predefined damping coefficient that ensures algorithm convergence,
Figure FDA0002699743890000036
the constituent set V of VUs represents the Kth in the Vth remaining subset of VUs (i.e., V/{ V }) that is deletedrA minimum message size, and 0<Kr≤M,Kr∈Z+Is a predefined parameter;
because the type of the solution objective in (8) is the minimum optimization summation, correspondingly, the invention sets the solution objective of the distributed message transfer mechanism as the sum of the minimum message quantity to obtain the final iteration output:
Figure FDA0002699743890000037
CN201710824227.1A 2017-09-13 2017-09-13 Social D2D relay selection method Active CN107608803B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201710824227.1A CN107608803B (en) 2017-09-13 2017-09-13 Social D2D relay selection method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201710824227.1A CN107608803B (en) 2017-09-13 2017-09-13 Social D2D relay selection method

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN107608803A CN107608803A (en) 2018-01-19
CN107608803B true CN107608803B (en) 2020-12-08

Family

ID=61064198

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201710824227.1A Active CN107608803B (en) 2017-09-13 2017-09-13 Social D2D relay selection method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN107608803B (en)

Families Citing this family (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN108616845B (en) * 2018-03-30 2021-10-26 佛山市顺德区中山大学研究院 D2D grouping multi-target caching method based on social content and system and device thereof
CN108566636B (en) * 2018-04-28 2020-07-31 中国人民解放军陆军工程大学 D2D random cache layout method oriented to different user preferences
CN110213775B (en) * 2019-05-24 2021-01-05 吉林大学 D2D relay selection method based on social attraction mobile model
CN111328092B (en) * 2020-02-27 2021-10-01 中山大学 Method for dynamically updating pre-information in D2D communication relay packet buffer allocation

Citations (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN103596241A (en) * 2013-10-14 2014-02-19 南京邮电大学 Single-relay communication method based on D2D communications
CN103607750A (en) * 2013-11-25 2014-02-26 南京邮电大学 Relay selection method based on terminal straight-through communication in next-generation cellular system
CN105430633A (en) * 2014-08-22 2016-03-23 电信科学技术研究院 Method and equipment for determining relay node
CN105792310A (en) * 2016-03-04 2016-07-20 哈尔滨工业大学深圳研究生院 Relay selection algorithm based on LTE Internet of vehicles
CN105992298A (en) * 2015-02-02 2016-10-05 北京信威通信技术股份有限公司 D2D communication relay node selection method
WO2016171495A1 (en) * 2015-04-21 2016-10-27 엘지전자 주식회사 Method and apparatus for selecting relay by device-to-device communication terminal and transmitting or receiving signal in wireless communication system
WO2017052569A1 (en) * 2015-09-25 2017-03-30 Nokia Solutions And Networks Oy Initiating and selecting a relay ue for d2d communications
CN106576077A (en) * 2015-07-24 2017-04-19 华为技术有限公司 Method, base station and network server determining relay UE and social relationship in a mobile social network
CN106576390A (en) * 2015-05-15 2017-04-19 华为技术有限公司 Method and apparatus for relay selection in device-to-device communications
CN107046675A (en) * 2017-05-05 2017-08-15 西安交通大学 Optimal relay selection method based on social threshold value in D2D collaboration communications

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
HUE044270T2 (en) * 2013-05-08 2019-10-28 Ericsson Telefon Ab L M Improved selection of scheduling policy for network communications links and d2d communications links
US20170055282A1 (en) * 2015-08-21 2017-02-23 Qualcomm Incorporated Connection setup in "device-to-device relayed uplink, direct downlink" architecture for cellular networks

Patent Citations (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN103596241A (en) * 2013-10-14 2014-02-19 南京邮电大学 Single-relay communication method based on D2D communications
CN103607750A (en) * 2013-11-25 2014-02-26 南京邮电大学 Relay selection method based on terminal straight-through communication in next-generation cellular system
CN105430633A (en) * 2014-08-22 2016-03-23 电信科学技术研究院 Method and equipment for determining relay node
CN105992298A (en) * 2015-02-02 2016-10-05 北京信威通信技术股份有限公司 D2D communication relay node selection method
WO2016171495A1 (en) * 2015-04-21 2016-10-27 엘지전자 주식회사 Method and apparatus for selecting relay by device-to-device communication terminal and transmitting or receiving signal in wireless communication system
CN106576390A (en) * 2015-05-15 2017-04-19 华为技术有限公司 Method and apparatus for relay selection in device-to-device communications
CN106576077A (en) * 2015-07-24 2017-04-19 华为技术有限公司 Method, base station and network server determining relay UE and social relationship in a mobile social network
WO2017052569A1 (en) * 2015-09-25 2017-03-30 Nokia Solutions And Networks Oy Initiating and selecting a relay ue for d2d communications
CN105792310A (en) * 2016-03-04 2016-07-20 哈尔滨工业大学深圳研究生院 Relay selection algorithm based on LTE Internet of vehicles
CN107046675A (en) * 2017-05-05 2017-08-15 西安交通大学 Optimal relay selection method based on social threshold value in D2D collaboration communications

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
《D2D协作通信中基于社交信息的中继选择和功率分配》;徐少毅 等;《电子与信息学报》;20170531;第39卷(第5期);第1142-1149页 *
《D2D通信中基于社交门限的最优中继选择方案》;李晨碧 等;《电讯技术》;20170331;第57卷(第3期);第322-328页 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN107608803A (en) 2018-01-19

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN107608803B (en) Social D2D relay selection method
Liu et al. Economically optimal MS association for multimedia content delivery in cache-enabled heterogeneous cloud radio access networks
Kamel et al. Performance analysis of multiple association in ultra-dense networks
He et al. Resource allocation based on graph neural networks in vehicular communications
Liu et al. Hierarchical radio resource optimization for heterogeneous networks with enhanced inter-cell interference coordination (eICIC)
CN104993889A (en) Multi-band cooperative spectrum sensing optimization method based on artificial bee colony algorithm
Chang et al. Dynamic fractional frequency reuse (D‐FFR) for multicell OFDMA networks using a graph framework
Zheng et al. Channel assignment for hybrid NOMA systems with deep reinforcement learning
CN109412661B (en) User clustering method under large-scale MIMO system
Wen et al. An overview of data-importance aware radio resource management for edge machine learning
Li et al. Dynamic spectrum access for internet-of-things based on federated deep reinforcement learning
Wang et al. Multi-agent reinforcement learning-based user pairing in multi-carrier NOMA systems
TW201918109A (en) Electronic apparatus and method for wireless communications
Jiang et al. Dynamic user pairing and power allocation for NOMA with deep reinforcement learning
Fu et al. Optimization of energy consumption in the MEC-assisted multi-user FD-SWIPT system
Li et al. An energy-effective network deployment scheme for 5G Cloud Radio Access Networks
Hu et al. Multi-agent DRL-based resource allocation in downlink multi-cell OFDMA system
CN107911857A (en) A kind of multi-access method based on upstream and downstream decoupling in super-intensive heterogeneous network
Wang et al. Energy efficiency maximization for multi-carrier cooperative non-orthogonal multiple access systems
Ebrahim et al. NOMA/OMA mode selection and resource allocation for beyond 5G networks
CN111343721B (en) D2D distributed resource allocation method for maximizing generalized energy efficiency of system
CN116684883A (en) Spectrum optimization method and device
Ding et al. Cross-layer resource allocation in NOMA systems with dynamic traffic arrivals
CN110248403A (en) A kind of resource management-control method of the maximization D2D connection number based on non-orthogonal multiple
CN113543145B (en) NOMA system user pairing and power distribution joint optimization method and device

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant