CN107506972A - Management review method for judicial expertise/forensic science mechanism - Google Patents
Management review method for judicial expertise/forensic science mechanism Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN107506972A CN107506972A CN201710579675.XA CN201710579675A CN107506972A CN 107506972 A CN107506972 A CN 107506972A CN 201710579675 A CN201710579675 A CN 201710579675A CN 107506972 A CN107506972 A CN 107506972A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- management
- management review
- director
- review
- signed
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/10—Office automation; Time management
- G06Q10/103—Workflow collaboration or project management
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Systems or methods specially adapted for specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/10—Services
- G06Q50/26—Government or public services
Abstract
The invention provides a kind of management review method for judicial expertise/forensic science mechanism, and it includes the first step, starts management review；Second step, it is selectable, formulate year evaluation plan；3rd step, implement management review.The management review method will be managed and freed from cumbersome manual operations, improve operating efficiency conscientiously, and each level role division of labor is clear and definite, clear process, and efficient management is realized by Internet technology.
Description
Technical field
The invention belongs to judicial expertise technical field, and in particular to a kind of pipe for judicial expertise/forensic science mechanism
Manage reviewing method.
Background technology
The quality control of case test sensitivity and the quality management in laboratory always be public security system examine testing agency,
The primary work of judicial expertise mechanism, forensic science mechanism.Current public security system both domestic and external is in test sensitivity and quality management
Many common problems be present in aspect：1st, because the operation and supervision of quality management system are all Lai complete by people in the work of reality
Into the objective factor of subjective impact being present, many programs in quality management system, it is unfavorable and lack of standardization to perform.It is second, universal
Business be present, manage relatively independent " two skins " phenomenon, i.e., the objective realities such as because existing technical staff lacks, case load is big
Difficulty, criminal technique department head, which thinks excessively to strengthen management, will lose part efficiency, therefore to Laboratory Accreditation and money
Matter identification has resentment, causes accreditation theory fully can not be fused in the middle of laboratory management, but in order to approve
And approve, continue to continue stereotype irregular management philosophy being managed, work random strong, full of guerrilla warfare custom, very
Faked in order to deal with Laboratory Accreditation and qualification certification evaluation.So the problem of, the lighter may influence to examine mirror
Determine quality, severe one can bring the hidden danger of frame-up and false and wrong cases.
Some existing public security systems manage routine work using KXG, but the problem of these management systems
It is that test sensitivity, quality management and material evidence are saved from damage and belong to three mutual disjunct subsystems with circulation, exists parallel, or
Personal management, quality document management and equipment control belong to several subsystems of compartment.But although said system is relative
In pure manual work, have large improvement, but the artificial inner link for isolating vocational work and management work, artificially make
Into antagonistic relations between the two, so not only can not really realize the horizontal lifting of laboratory room managing, make quality management with
Appraisal, which is formed, makes a concerted effort, and is divided into two on the contrary, adds the workload of application person, reduces operating efficiency and work actively
Property.Therefore, how standardized management really is realized according to international standard, is to put difficult point urgently to be resolved hurrily in face of us and ask
Topic.Find it is a will veritably can manage with business organic unity get up management system be the path that solves the above problems it
One.
Management review is a very important ring during judicial expertise, and current management review process is all manually to manage
Reason, because flow is complicated, participant is numerous, and level is various, often causes whole flow process long, and program is excessively slow, and efficiency is too low
The problem of.
The content of the invention
To overcome above-mentioned technical problem, the present invention provides one kind and is applied to judicial expertise/forensic science mechanism intelligent integrated
Change the management review method of information management, it relies on information system management means, by " internet+", Internet of Things administrative skill and inspection
Authenticate and determine practice, quality control and quality management perfect adaptation, realize quality control from static state to dynamic conversion, will manage
Being freed from cumbersome manual operations, improve operating efficiency conscientiously, each level role division of labor is clear and definite, clear process, by
Internet technology realizes efficient management.
The present invention provides a kind of management review of intelligent integral information management for judicial expertise/forensic science mechanism
Method, it includes：
The first step, start management review；
Second step, it is selectable, formulate year evaluation plan；
3rd step, implement management review.
Wherein, the first step is specially further that Quality Control room member starts management review implementation, is born by appraisal organization
The approval of people is blamed, push is passed round and signed for, and document is signed in acquisition.
Wherein, the second step is specially further that Quality Administration formulates management when needing to formulate year evaluation plan
Evaluation annual plan simultaneously formulates corresponding form, is then audited by technical director, if desired for modification, returns and is repaiied at Quality Administration
Change, it is not necessary to change, by appraisal organization, director ratifies, if necessary to change, return to technical director examination ＆ verification, return again to
Quality Administration is changed, it is not necessary to is changed, then push is worn and signed for, and document is signed in acquisition.
Wherein, the 3rd step is specially further to implement management review, formation review report, professional technique director,
Internal anditor, quality control supervisor, security official, commodity manager, equipment manager, archivist, Quality Control room member, technology are total
Prison, Quality Administration, authorities director make pipe Commentary Report announcement respectively, preserve, and pass through and hold pipe jointly and comment meeting, to pipe Commentary Report
Announcement is audited, and non-compliant pipe Commentary Report is accused and modified, director is checked and approved by appraisal organization, if do not repaiied
Change, preserve review report, sign for achieving.
The present invention also provides a kind of device/terminal device for judicial expertise/forensic science organization management evaluation, and it is wrapped
The computer program that includes memory, processor and storage in memory and can be run in the processor, the processing
The computer program that device performs performs the step in above-mentioned management review method.
Described device/terminal device can be that desktop PC, notebook, palm PC and cloud server etc. calculate
Equipment.
The present invention also provides a kind of computer-readable storage medium for judicial expertise/forensic science organization management evaluation
Matter, the computer-readable recording medium storage have computer program, are realized when the computer program is executed by processor
State the step in management review method.
Beneficial technique effect
The present invention provides a kind of management review applied to judicial expertise/forensic science mechanism intelligent integral information management
Method, its rely on information system management means, will " internet+", Internet of Things administrative skill and test sensitivity practice, quality control and
Quality management perfect adaptation, quality control is realized from static state to dynamic conversion, management is solved from cumbersome manual operations
Take off, improve operating efficiency conscientiously, each level role division of labor is clear and definite, clear process, is realized by Internet technology efficient
Management.
Brief description of the drawings
Fig. 1 is applied to the management review method schematic diagram of judicial expertise/forensic science mechanism intelligent integral information management.
Embodiment
The present invention provides a kind of management review of intelligent integral information management for judicial expertise/forensic science mechanism
Method, it includes：
The first step, start management review, Quality Control room member starts management review and implemented, by batch of appraisal organization director
Standard, push are passed round and signed for, and document is signed in acquisition；
Second step, selectable, when needing to formulate year evaluation plan, Quality Administration formulates management review annual plan
And corresponding form is formulated, then audited by technical director, if desired for modification, return and changed at Quality Administration, it is not necessary to repaiied
Change, by appraisal organization, director ratifies, and if necessary to change, returns to technical director's examination ＆ verification, returns again to and repaiied to Quality Administration
Change, it is not necessary to change, then push is worn and signed for, and document is signed in acquisition；
3rd step, implement management review, form review report, professional technique director, internal anditor, quality control supervisor, peace
Crew, commodity manager, equipment manager, archivist, Quality Control room member, technical director, Quality Administration, authorities bear
Duty people makes pipe Commentary Report announcement respectively, preserves, and passes through and holds pipe jointly and comment meeting, and pipe Commentary Report is accused and audited, to not meeting mark
Accurate pipe Commentary Report is accused and modified, and by appraisal organization, director is checked and approved, if do not changed, is preserved review report, is signed for
Achieve.
The present invention also provides a kind of device/terminal device for judicial expertise/forensic science organization management evaluation, and it is wrapped
The computer program that includes memory, processor and storage in memory and can be run in the processor, the processing
The computer program that device performs performs the step in above-mentioned management review method.
Described device/terminal device can be that desktop PC, notebook, palm PC and cloud server etc. calculate
Equipment.
The present invention also provides a kind of computer-readable storage medium for judicial expertise/forensic science organization management evaluation
Matter, the computer-readable recording medium storage have computer program, are realized when the computer program is executed by processor
State the step in management review method.
Embodiments of the present invention are described in detail using embodiment and accompanying drawing below, how skill is applied to the present invention whereby
Art means solve technical problem, and the implementation process for reaching technique effect can fully understand and implement according to this.
As shown in figure 1, the present invention provides a kind of intelligent integral message tube applied to judicial expertise/forensic science mechanism
The management review method of reason, it includes：
The first step, start management review, Quality Control room member starts management review and implemented, by batch of appraisal organization director
Standard, push are passed round and signed for, and document is signed in acquisition；
Second step, selectable, when needing to formulate year evaluation plan, Quality Administration formulates management review annual plan
And corresponding form is formulated, then audited by technical director, if desired for modification, return and changed at Quality Administration, it is not necessary to repaiied
Change, by appraisal organization, director ratifies, and if necessary to change, returns to technical director's examination ＆ verification, returns again to and repaiied to Quality Administration
Change, it is not necessary to change, then push is worn and signed for, and document is signed in acquisition；
3rd step, implement management review, form review report, professional technique director, internal anditor, quality control supervisor, peace
Crew, commodity manager, equipment manager, archivist, Quality Control room member, technical director, Quality Administration, authorities bear
Duty people makes pipe Commentary Report announcement respectively, preserves, and passes through and holds pipe jointly and comment meeting, and pipe Commentary Report is accused and audited, to not meeting mark
Accurate pipe Commentary Report is accused and modified, and by appraisal organization, director is checked and approved, if do not changed, is preserved review report, is signed for
Achieve.
All above-mentioned this intellectual properties of primarily implementation, the not this new product of implementation of setting limitation other forms
And/or new method.Those skilled in the art will utilize this important information, the above modification, to realize similar execution feelings
Condition.But all modifications or transformation belong to the right of reservation based on new product of the present invention.
The above described is only a preferred embodiment of the present invention, being not the limitation for making other forms to the present invention, appoint
What those skilled in the art changed or be modified as possibly also with the technology contents of the disclosure above equivalent variations etc.
Imitate embodiment.But it is every without departing from technical solution of the present invention content, the technical spirit according to the present invention is to above example institute
Any simple modification, equivalent variations and the remodeling made, still fall within the protection domain of technical solution of the present invention.
Claims (7)
- A kind of 1. management review method applied to judicial expertise/forensic science mechanism, it is characterised in that including：The first step, start management review；Second step, it is selectable, formulate year evaluation plan；3rd step, implement management review.
- 2. management review method as claimed in claim 1, it is characterised in that：The first step further be specially Quality Control room into Member starts management review and implemented, and by the approval of appraisal organization director, push is passed round and signed for, and document is signed in acquisition.
- 3. management review method as claimed in claim 1 or 2, it is characterised in that：The second step is specially further to work as to need When formulating annual evaluation plan, Quality Administration formulates management review annual plan and formulates corresponding form, then passes through skill Art chief inspector audits, and if desired for modification, returns and is changed at Quality Administration, it is not necessary to changed, director ratifies by appraisal organization, such as Fruit needs to change, and returns to technical director's examination ＆ verification, returns again to and changed to Quality Administration, it is not necessary to change, then push is worn and signed for, Document is signed in acquisition.
- 4. the management review method as described in claims 1 to 3, it is characterised in that：3rd step is specially further to implement Management review, form review report, professional technique director, internal anditor, quality control supervisor, security official, commodity manager, equipment Keeper, archivist, Quality Control room member, technical director, Quality Administration, authorities director make pipe Commentary Report respectively Accuse, preserve, pass through and hold pipe jointly and comment meeting, pipe Commentary Report is accused and audited, non-compliant pipe Commentary Report is accused and repaiied Change, by appraisal organization, director is checked and approved, if do not changed, is preserved review report, is signed for achieving.
- A kind of 5. device/terminal device applied to judicial expertise/forensic science organization management evaluation, it is characterised in that：Including Memory, processor and storage in memory and the computer program that can be run in the processor, the processor The computer program perform claim performed requires the step in 1 to the 4 management review method.
- 6. device/terminal device applied to judicial expertise/forensic science organization management evaluation as claimed in claim 5, its It is characterised by：Described device/terminal device can be the meter such as desktop PC, notebook, palm PC and cloud server Calculate equipment.
- A kind of 7. computer-readable recording medium for judicial expertise/forensic science organization management evaluation, it is characterised in that：Institute Stating computer-readable recording medium storage has computer program, and the computer program realizes claim when being executed by processor Step in 1 to the 4 management review method.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201710579675.XA CN107506972A (en) | 2017-07-17 | 2017-07-17 | Management review method for judicial expertise/forensic science mechanism |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201710579675.XA CN107506972A (en) | 2017-07-17 | 2017-07-17 | Management review method for judicial expertise/forensic science mechanism |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN107506972A true CN107506972A (en) | 2017-12-22 |
Family
ID=60679831
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201710579675.XA Pending CN107506972A (en) | 2017-07-17 | 2017-07-17 | Management review method for judicial expertise/forensic science mechanism |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN107506972A (en) |
-
2017
- 2017-07-17 CN CN201710579675.XA patent/CN107506972A/en active Pending
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Arnaud | Conceptualizing and measuring ethical work climate: Development and validation of the ethical climate index | |
| Kusumah et al. | Model design of information security governance assessment with collaborative integration of COBIT 5 and ITIL (case study: INTRAC) | |
| Ahmed | Overview of security metrics | |
| Dhillon et al. | Identifying governance dimensions to evaluate information systems security in organizations | |
| CN107423892A (en) | Personnel management methods for judicial expertise/forensic science mechanism | |
| CN107506972A (en) | Management review method for judicial expertise/forensic science mechanism | |
| CN107451725A (en) | Instrument ＆ equipment management method for judicial expertise/forensic science mechanism | |
| Moses et al. | Empirical Study on the State of Practice of Information Security Management in Local Government | |
| CN107423266A (en) | Expertise management method applied to judicial expertise/forensic science mechanism | |
| Salleh et al. | Encouraging factors for whistleblowing in public sector: Malaysian case evidence | |
| Hu et al. | Exploratory study on risk management of state-owned construction enterprises in China | |
| CN107464041A (en) | Internal check method for judicial expertise/forensic science mechanism | |
| Fernandez-Izquierdo et al. | Comprehensive management and financial and extra-financial risk control to overcome the business crisis | |
| Faliza | Can Organizational Culture Encourage Islamic Banking Performance?: The Role of Organizational Commitment as Mediation | |
| Rajab et al. | A multi-level analysis of the implementation of industrial internet of things: challenges and future prospects | |
| Jordaan | A sample of digital forensic quality assurance in the South African criminal justice system | |
| Rehat et al. | Enhancing organization performance through the implementation of MS1900: 2005 | |
| Dakić et al. | JUDICIAL AND TECHNICAL IMPROVEMENT OF GENERAL DATA PROTECTION REGULATION. | |
| Kiedrowicz et al. | Models and method for the risk assessment of an intellectual resource | |
| CN107292569A (en) | Purchasing of consumables management method for judicial expertise/forensic science mechanism | |
| Ye et al. | Discussion on risk assessment of network security management | |
| Astuti et al. | ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECT OF COMPETENCY AND INDEPENDENCE ON THE QUALITY OF AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AUDIT RISK AS MEDIATION DURING THE COVID 19 PANDEMIC (Empirical Study on KAP in Central Java) | |
| Christina et al. | Factors that influence auditor’s professional skepticism | |
| Whitty | Risk, human rights and the management of a serious sex offender | |
| Alexeiev | Ensuring the Guaranteed Level of Flights Safety-The View of the Future |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |
Application publication date: 20171222 |
|
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |