CN107491818A - A kind of fast evaluation method of operational aircraft war wound grade - Google Patents
A kind of fast evaluation method of operational aircraft war wound grade Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN107491818A CN107491818A CN201710653511.7A CN201710653511A CN107491818A CN 107491818 A CN107491818 A CN 107491818A CN 201710653511 A CN201710653511 A CN 201710653511A CN 107491818 A CN107491818 A CN 107491818A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- damage
- coefficient
- repair time
- repair
- degree
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/20—Administration of product repair or maintenance
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
The invention discloses a kind of fast evaluation method of operational aircraft war wound grade, belong to air equipment maintenance technique field.Methods described includes defective component clear and definite first and its damage type, determines the degree of injury of each defective component, secondly, pair can repair defective component, determines that it, to aircraft safety, the influence degree of task, obtains severity coefficient by FMEA analyses；Repair time is determined simultaneously, obtains repair time coefficient；And determine to whether there is using limitation after repairing, obtain using limit coefficient；Impairment scale is finally calculated according to above three coefficient, and service sequence is determined according to impairment scale.The present invention war wound grade appraisal procedure, to the repair time under existing maintenance support resources supplIes, degree of injury and whether have using limitation three for the use of carry out qualitative and quantitative analysis, reliable results, can quickly determine Rush Repair Scheme.
Description
Technical field
The invention belongs to air equipment maintenance technique field, and in particular to a kind of rapid evaluation of operational aircraft war wound grade
Method.
Background technology
Modern war history experience have shown that, in war the quantity of damaged aircraft considerably beyond war damage aircraft quantity, in battlefield
Under environment, Battlefield Repair can quickly make up war loss, keep the certain fighting capacity of a group of planes.The judgement of aircraft war wound grade is multiple
Miscellaneous decision process, the decision method of aircraft war wound grade are the bases for formulating Battlefield Repair scheme.Therefore, aircraft war wound war wound
The assessment technology research of grade, has great importance to lifting Aircraft Battlefield Repair ability.
GJBZ-20437-97<Equipment Battlefield Damage assesses the preparation request with repairing handbook>In define equipment war wound comment
Estimate included substance requirement.This standard is the universal standard, and operational aircraft is not fully adapted to, and aircraft war wound grade is commented
The method of estimating should combine combat duty, rush to repair the condition such as resource and time limit, war wound spray should pay close attention to influence for battlefield surroundings because
Element, accomplish quick, effective.
The content of the invention
In order to solve the above problems, the invention provides a kind of fast evaluation method of operational aircraft war wound grade, mainly
Comprise the following steps：
Step 1: clear and definite defective component and its damage type, the degree of injury of each defective component, the degree of injury are determined
Including allowable damage, it can repair and damage and can not repair damage；
Step 2: pair defective component can be repaiied, determine whether it needs to be detected, judge to damage according to testing result
Hinder whether degree can be divided to allowable damage；
Step 3: repairing defective component to what step 2 determined, determine it to aircraft safety, task by FMEA analyses
Influence degree, severity coefficient X1 is obtained, higher to the influence degree of aircraft safety, task, severity coefficient X1 is higher；
Step 4: repairing defective component to what step 2 determined, repair time is determined, repair time coefficient X2 is obtained, repaiies
The multiple time is shorter, and repair time, coefficient X2 was lower；
Step 5: repairing defective component to what step 2 determined, it is determined that whether there is after reparation using limitation, have using limit
When processed, it is 2 to determine limit coefficient X3, and when no use limits, it is 1 to determine limit coefficient X3；
Step 6: calculating impairment scale V=X1*X2*X3, service sequence is determined according to impairment scale, impairment scale is higher,
More first repair.
Preferably, in the step 3, when severity grade is respectively I, II, III, IV, the severity coefficient difference
For 4,3,2,1.
Preferably, in the step 4, repair time, repair time coefficient X2 was 1 within 2 hours；Repair time
In 2-5 hours, repair time coefficient X2 is 2, and repair time is 3 in 5-10 hours, repair time coefficient X2, and repair time is 10
More than hour, repair time coefficient X2 is 4.
Preferably, in the step 4, the repair time is maintenance time and adjustment testing time sum.
Preferably, in the step 6, for the impairment scale V in 1-10, damage rank is slight；Described damage etc.
V is in 11-20 for level, and damage rank is moderate, and when the impairment scale V is more than 20, damage rank is severe, and service sequence is
Severe, moderate and slight
The advantage of the invention is that：By in GJBZ-20437-97<Equipment Battlefield Damage is assessed with repairing writing for handbook
It is required that>In defined content basis, with reference to operational aircraft Battlefield Repair feature and major influence factors, appraisal procedure is optimized.
Improved by being innovated to analysis method, formulated a set of principle suitable for operational aircraft war wound grade fast evaluation method, flowed
Journey and logic decision method, foundation is provided to formulate operational aircraft Battlefield Repair scheme.
Assessed by the war wound grade of the present invention, there is higher directive significance to Flight Line Maintenance, to existing maintenance support
Repair time, degree of injury under resources supplIes and whether having is carried out qualitative and quantitative analysis for the use of limitation three, as a result
Reliably, Rush Repair Scheme can quickly be determined.
Brief description of the drawings
Fig. 1 is the flow chart according to a preferred embodiment of the fast evaluation method of operational aircraft war wound grade of the present invention.
Embodiment
To make the purpose, technical scheme and advantage that the present invention is implemented clearer, below in conjunction with the embodiment of the present invention
Accompanying drawing, the technical scheme in the embodiment of the present invention is further described in more detail.In the accompanying drawings, identical from beginning to end or class
As label represent same or similar element or the element with same or like function.Described embodiment is the present invention
Part of the embodiment, rather than whole embodiments.The embodiments described below with reference to the accompanying drawings are exemplary, it is intended to uses
It is of the invention in explaining, and be not considered as limiting the invention.Based on the embodiment in the present invention, ordinary skill people
The every other embodiment that member is obtained under the premise of creative work is not made, belongs to the scope of protection of the invention.Under
Embodiments of the invention are described in detail with reference to accompanying drawing for face.
In the description of the invention, it is to be understood that term " " center ", " longitudinal direction ", " transverse direction ", "front", "rear",
The orientation or position relationship of the instruction such as "left", "right", " vertical ", " level ", " top ", " bottom " " interior ", " outer " is based on accompanying drawing institutes
The orientation or position relationship shown, it is for only for ease of the description present invention and simplifies description, rather than instruction or the dress for implying meaning
Put or element there must be specific orientation, with specific azimuth configuration and operation, therefore it is not intended that the present invention is protected
The limitation of scope.
The fast evaluation method of operational aircraft war wound grade of the present invention, as shown in figure 1, mainly including the following steps that：
Step 1: clear and definite defective component and its damage type, the degree of injury of each defective component, the degree of injury are determined
Including allowable damage, it can repair and damage and can not repair damage；
Step 2: pair defective component can be repaiied, determine whether it needs to be detected, judge to damage according to testing result
Hinder whether degree can be divided to allowable damage；
Step 3: repairing defective component to what step 2 determined, determine it to aircraft safety, task by FMEA analyses
Influence degree, severity coefficient X1 is obtained, higher to the influence degree of aircraft safety, task, severity coefficient X1 is higher；
Step 4: repairing defective component to what step 2 determined, repair time is determined, repair time coefficient X2 is obtained, repaiies
The multiple time is shorter, and repair time, coefficient X2 was lower；
Step 5: repairing defective component to what step 2 determined, it is determined that whether there is after reparation using limitation, have using limit
When processed, it is 2 to determine limit coefficient X3, and when no use limits, it is 1 to determine limit coefficient X3；
Step 6: calculating impairment scale V=X1*X2*X3, service sequence is determined according to impairment scale, impairment scale is higher,
More first repair.
Lower mask body is parsed.
In step 1, degree of injury classification clear and definite first：Allowable damage, damage can be repaiied and damage can not be repaiied.
System injury：That analyzes each damage rushes to repair status, if is important systemic-function part, to aircraft safety
Influence caused by flight performance, completion task ability.Allowable damage is included into respectively, can repair damage and can not repair three classes of damage.
Structural damage：Situations such as by considering aircraft structure strength, damage tolerance, pneumatic and function, by aircraft knot
The damage of Gou Ge areas different type component is included into allowable damage, can repair damage and can not repair three classes of damage respectively.
When the forced landing of war wound is on airport, appraiser is checked system, part and device in damage location.
Its scope of examination:Abrasion, damage, loosen；The destruction of bullet wound；The leakage of pipeline or pipeline and its accessory；Cable or wire breaks
Split, release.On the basis of inspection, preliminary judgement is made to the workability of damaged aircraft.
Degree of injury distinguishing rule explanation：
(l) damage does not influence fight capability, then is not required to repair, task-allowable damage is continued executing with after can checking；
(2) if do not repaired, make routine inspection and make, using limitation, to continue executing with task-allowable damage；
(3) corresponding repair method can be taken to repair damaged aircraft under condition of external field, or can be repaired to executable part
Task-damage can be repaiied.
(4) outfield repair capability can not be fixed, recycling-can not repair damage.
It is as shown in the table, if repairable item mesh invariably in damaged aircraft damage list, is primarily determined that as that can repair damage,
Clearly further detection demand, and repairing resource are then needed, into the work of next step.
In step 2, when judging the machine as that can repair degree of injury using step 1, what it was included, which repaiies job, is
Foundation, action include：Damage item detection, the analysis of the damage project extent of injury, the analysis of repairing time limit.
Damage item detection：War wound detection is divided into situ detection and detection of offing normal.The war wound species of corresponding aircraft, using not
Same detection method.Predominantly detect classification：Burn detection；Malformation, crack detection；Meet material damage detection.According to inspection
Conclusion is surveyed, according to correlation discriminating according to repairability judgement is carried out, the war damage aircraft that damage project can not be repaiied for presence then performs
Reclaimer, do not enter back into and analyze in next step.Following table gives certain machine damage check project table.
Step 3, to carry out three indexs of war wound grade assessment, illustrates individually below to step 5.
The damage project extent of injury is analyzed：
Extent of injury classification is carried out with reference to GJB/Z 1391-2006 regulation severity classifications, and severity grade defines respectively
For I, II, III, IV totally four major class.Determine each damage project to aircraft by FMEA analyses for damaging project listed by war damage aircraft
Safety, the influence degree of task.
One kind-disaster, cause personnel death, product damage, great environmental damage；
Two classes-fatal, cause serious injuries, or heavy economic losses, or cause mission failure, product seriously damages
It is bad, and significant environmental damage；
Three classes-medium, cause personnel's moderate injury or moderate economic loss, or cause task be delayed or
Degrade, the moderate damage of product, and the moderate damage of environment；
Four classes-slight, it is not enough to cause personnel to injure, or slight economic loss, or the slight damage of product, and ring
Border is damaged, but it can cause unscheduled maintenance or repairing.
Wherein, the coefficient of severity I, II, III, IV is respectively 4,3,2,1.
Rush to repair the time limit and use restriction analysis：Damage project can be repaiied for damaged aircraft, emergency repair time is assessed, according to each damage
Length is classified the time required to hindering project repairing.Specific category defines (the visual task emergency of time class declaration or phase
Pass demand adjustment)：
Emergency repair time is determined according to the disassembly and assembly time of defective component and adjustment time；
1st, extremely short (in 2 hours)
2nd, shorter (2-5 hours)
3rd, it is general (5-10 hours)
4th, it is relatively slow (more than 10 hours)
In the present embodiment, repair time, repair time coefficient X2 was 1 within 2 hours；Repair time in 2-5 hours, repaiies
Multiple time coefficient X2 is 2, and repair time is 3 in 5-10 hours, repair time coefficient X2, and repair time more than 10 hours, repaiies
Multiple time coefficient X2 is 4.
The concrete analysis table of the emergency repair time of the embodiment see the table below.
It is determined that whether use limitation after repairing：There is use to be limited to 2, no use is limited to 1.
Finally, impairment scale V=X1*X2*X3 is calculated, service sequence is determined according to impairment scale, impairment scale is higher, more
First repair.It is as shown in the table.
| Sequence number | Project | Severity | Time | Use limitation | Grade |
| 1 | Pipeline | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| 2 | 22 stringers | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| 3 | Xx | 4 | 4 | 2 | 32 |
In the present embodiment, degree of injury：Grade 1-10 is slight, and grade 11-20 is moderate；More than 20 be severe.Making
When determining Battlefield Repair scheme, refer to above-mentioned grade and carry out repairing sequence.
In the present embodiment, with caused damage item detection conclusion in step 2, damage project extent of injury analytical conclusions,
It is foundation to rush to repair the time limit and use restriction analysis conclusion, is entered by qualitative and quantitative decision method in step 3-step 6
The rapid evaluation of row war wound grade.
The determination of war wound grade is to formulate the basis of Rush Repair Scheme, and therefore, war wound grade here is based on war damage aircraft
Damage can be repaiied for outfield, whether had after the repair time, damage influence degree, estimated repairing under existing maintenance support resources supplIes
The impairment scale defined for the use of limitation three, reliable results, can fast and accurately determine Rush Repair Scheme.
It is last it is to be noted that：The above embodiments are merely illustrative of the technical solutions of the present invention, rather than its limitations.To the greatest extent
The present invention is described in detail with reference to the foregoing embodiments for pipe, it will be understood by those within the art that：It is still
Technical scheme described in foregoing embodiments can be modified, or which part technical characteristic is equally replaced
Change；And these modifications or replacement, the essence of appropriate technical solution is departed from the essence of various embodiments of the present invention technical scheme
God and scope.
Claims (5)
- A kind of 1. fast evaluation method of operational aircraft war wound grade, it is characterised in that including：Step 1: clear and definite defective component and its damage type, the degree of injury of each defective component is determined, the degree of injury includes Allowable damage, damage can be repaiied and damage can not be repaiied；Step 2: pair defective component can be repaiied, determine whether it needs to be detected, damage journey is judged according to testing result Whether degree can be divided to allowable damage；Step 3: repairing defective component to what step 2 determined, determine it to aircraft safety, the influence of task by FMEA analyses Degree, severity coefficient X1 is obtained, higher to the influence degree of aircraft safety, task, severity coefficient X1 is higher；Step 4: repairing defective component to what step 2 determined, repair time is determined, obtains repair time coefficient X2, during reparation Between it is shorter, repair time, coefficient X2 was lower；Step 5: repairing defective component to what step 2 determined, it is determined that whether there is after reparation using limitation, have using limitation When, it is 2 to determine limit coefficient X3, and when no use limits, it is 1 to determine limit coefficient X3；Step 6: calculating impairment scale V=X1*X2*X3, service sequence is determined according to impairment scale, impairment scale is higher, more first Repair.
- 2. the fast evaluation method of operational aircraft war wound grade as claimed in claim 1, it is characterised in that the step 3 In, when severity grade is respectively I, II, III, IV, the severity coefficient is respectively 4,3,2,1.
- 3. the fast evaluation method of operational aircraft war wound grade as claimed in claim 1, it is characterised in that the step 4 In, repair time, repair time coefficient X2 was 1 within 2 hours；Repair time, repair time coefficient X2 was 2 in 2-5 hours, Repair time, repair time coefficient X2 was 3 in 5-10 hours, and repair time, repair time coefficient X2 was 4 more than 10 hours.
- 4. the fast evaluation method of operational aircraft war wound grade as claimed in claim 1, it is characterised in that the step 4 In, the repair time is maintenance time and adjustment testing time sum.
- 5. the fast evaluation method of operational aircraft war wound grade as claimed in claim 1, it is characterised in that the step 6 In, for the impairment scale V in 1-10, damage rank is slight；The impairment scale V is in 11-20, during damage rank is Degree, when the impairment scale V is more than 20, damage rank be severe, and service sequence is severe, moderate and slightly.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201710653511.7A CN107491818A (en) | 2017-08-02 | 2017-08-02 | A kind of fast evaluation method of operational aircraft war wound grade |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201710653511.7A CN107491818A (en) | 2017-08-02 | 2017-08-02 | A kind of fast evaluation method of operational aircraft war wound grade |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN107491818A true CN107491818A (en) | 2017-12-19 |
Family
ID=60644042
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201710653511.7A Pending CN107491818A (en) | 2017-08-02 | 2017-08-02 | A kind of fast evaluation method of operational aircraft war wound grade |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN107491818A (en) |
Cited By (7)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN108536951A (en) * | 2018-04-03 | 2018-09-14 | 西北工业大学 | A kind of sort method of operational aircraft battlc damagc spare parts importance |
| CN108614938A (en) * | 2018-04-28 | 2018-10-02 | 西北工业大学 | A kind of Aircraft Survivability method for improving considering Campaign Process |
| CN109543251A (en) * | 2018-11-05 | 2019-03-29 | 中国航空工业集团公司西安飞机设计研究所 | A kind of airborne equipment development guarantee grade distribution method |
| CN115511129A (en) * | 2022-10-11 | 2022-12-23 | 中国人民解放军陆军装甲兵学院 | Armored equipment battlefield damage assessment analysis method and system |
| CN116029700A (en) * | 2023-02-07 | 2023-04-28 | 中国人民解放军空军工程大学航空机务士官学校 | Task-based aircraft system damage evaluation and maintenance information determination method |
| CN116127754A (en) * | 2023-01-18 | 2023-05-16 | 中国人民解放军空军工程大学航空机务士官学校 | War injury aircraft war time availability evaluation method based on half tensor product theory |
| CN118037267A (en) * | 2024-02-02 | 2024-05-14 | 浙江大学 | Method and system for evaluating execution time of aircraft overhaul task based on multidimensional historical data |
Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN102156820A (en) * | 2011-04-27 | 2011-08-17 | 北京航空航天大学 | Method for analyzing harmfulness of mechanical assembly process |
| CN103745107A (en) * | 2014-01-10 | 2014-04-23 | 北京电子工程总体研究所 | Fault mode-based establishment method for maintenance support simulation system for equipment basic level |
| CN105956668A (en) * | 2016-04-20 | 2016-09-21 | 中国商用飞机有限责任公司 | Method and device for supporting maintenance of aircraft structural damage |
-
2017
- 2017-08-02 CN CN201710653511.7A patent/CN107491818A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN102156820A (en) * | 2011-04-27 | 2011-08-17 | 北京航空航天大学 | Method for analyzing harmfulness of mechanical assembly process |
| CN103745107A (en) * | 2014-01-10 | 2014-04-23 | 北京电子工程总体研究所 | Fault mode-based establishment method for maintenance support simulation system for equipment basic level |
| CN105956668A (en) * | 2016-04-20 | 2016-09-21 | 中国商用飞机有限责任公司 | Method and device for supporting maintenance of aircraft structural damage |
Cited By (10)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN108536951A (en) * | 2018-04-03 | 2018-09-14 | 西北工业大学 | A kind of sort method of operational aircraft battlc damagc spare parts importance |
| CN108614938A (en) * | 2018-04-28 | 2018-10-02 | 西北工业大学 | A kind of Aircraft Survivability method for improving considering Campaign Process |
| CN109543251A (en) * | 2018-11-05 | 2019-03-29 | 中国航空工业集团公司西安飞机设计研究所 | A kind of airborne equipment development guarantee grade distribution method |
| CN115511129A (en) * | 2022-10-11 | 2022-12-23 | 中国人民解放军陆军装甲兵学院 | Armored equipment battlefield damage assessment analysis method and system |
| CN115511129B (en) * | 2022-10-11 | 2024-03-22 | 中国人民解放军陆军装甲兵学院 | Armored equipment battlefield damage evaluation analysis method and system |
| CN116127754A (en) * | 2023-01-18 | 2023-05-16 | 中国人民解放军空军工程大学航空机务士官学校 | War injury aircraft war time availability evaluation method based on half tensor product theory |
| CN116127754B (en) * | 2023-01-18 | 2023-09-19 | 中国人民解放军空军工程大学航空机务士官学校 | War injury aircraft war time availability evaluation method based on half tensor product theory |
| CN116029700A (en) * | 2023-02-07 | 2023-04-28 | 中国人民解放军空军工程大学航空机务士官学校 | Task-based aircraft system damage evaluation and maintenance information determination method |
| CN118037267A (en) * | 2024-02-02 | 2024-05-14 | 浙江大学 | Method and system for evaluating execution time of aircraft overhaul task based on multidimensional historical data |
| CN118037267B (en) * | 2024-02-02 | 2024-08-20 | 浙江大学 | Method and system for evaluating execution time of aircraft overhaul task based on multidimensional historical data |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN107491818A (en) | A kind of fast evaluation method of operational aircraft war wound grade | |
| EP2092401B1 (en) | Hard landing detection | |
| CN102680221A (en) | Fatigue test method for full-aircraft main operating system of aircraft | |
| Molent | Managing airframe fatigue from corrosion pits–a proposal | |
| Molent | Fatigue crack growth from flaws in combat aircraft | |
| US7925453B2 (en) | Assessing conditions of aircraft wiring | |
| US7382283B2 (en) | Method and device for detecting an overstepping of design loads of the tailplane of an aircraft | |
| CN108229705A (en) | A kind of Missile Equipment damage mode and impact analysis method | |
| Enright et al. | Application of probabilistic fracture mechanics to prognosis of aircraft engine components | |
| Distefano et al. | Risk assessment procedure for civil airport | |
| CN103679341A (en) | Flight ground operation support efficiency evaluation method | |
| Knezevic | Quality of maintenance: Mirce Mechanics axiom | |
| dos Santos | Embraer perspective on SHM introduction into commercial aviation programs | |
| Bouarfa et al. | Automated Drone-Based Aircraft Inspection | |
| Sutton et al. | Allowable pressure cycling limits for liquid pipelines | |
| CN108116693B (en) | Method for prolonging service life of machine group and single machine state comprehensive fatigue | |
| CN112528510B (en) | Method for predicting repairable aviation material spare parts based on life-extinction process model | |
| Balicki et al. | Aircraft engines: analysis of reported systems failures in Polish aviation during years 2008-2015 | |
| Socha et al. | Risk management in the process of aircraft ground handling | |
| CN205746044U (en) | Laser ranging formula pipeline breaks protection system soon | |
| Balicki et al. | Assessment of the airframe systems affecting safety risks caused by large aircraft | |
| Bos | A viable opportunity for fielding an aircraft Structural Health Monitoring system | |
| Virca et al. | Research on Improving the Maintenance Activities for Military Vehicles | |
| CN108482707B (en) | Structural corrosion inspection requirement equivalent evaluation method based on aircraft service corrosion data | |
| Dalton | Accomplishing a meaningful particular risks assessment document |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |
Application publication date: 20171219 |