CN107315684A - A kind of software reliability estimation method based on basic block - Google Patents

A kind of software reliability estimation method based on basic block Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN107315684A
CN107315684A CN201710502732.4A CN201710502732A CN107315684A CN 107315684 A CN107315684 A CN 107315684A CN 201710502732 A CN201710502732 A CN 201710502732A CN 107315684 A CN107315684 A CN 107315684A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
basic block
software
msub
mrow
node
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
CN201710502732.4A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN107315684B (en
Inventor
李尚杰
郝晓鹏
郭鹏飞
穆海荣
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Beijing Shenzhou Aerospace Software Technology Co.,Ltd.
Original Assignee
BEIJING SHENZHOU AEROSPACE SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by BEIJING SHENZHOU AEROSPACE SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY Co Ltd filed Critical BEIJING SHENZHOU AEROSPACE SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY Co Ltd
Priority to CN201710502732.4A priority Critical patent/CN107315684B/en
Publication of CN107315684A publication Critical patent/CN107315684A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN107315684B publication Critical patent/CN107315684B/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F11/00Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
    • G06F11/36Preventing errors by testing or debugging software
    • G06F11/3668Software testing
    • G06F11/3672Test management
    • G06F11/3684Test management for test design, e.g. generating new test cases
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F11/00Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
    • G06F11/36Preventing errors by testing or debugging software
    • G06F11/3668Software testing
    • G06F11/3672Test management
    • G06F11/3688Test management for test execution, e.g. scheduling of test suites

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Stored Programmes (AREA)

Abstract

The invention belongs to software reliability field, and in particular to a kind of software reliability estimation method based on basic block.A kind of software reliability estimation method based on basic block, comprises the following steps:(1) controlling stream graph is built;(2) the defect coefficient matrix of basic block is set up using the basic block instruction number of tested software;(3) the potential number of defects of basic block is assessed;(4) the defect exposure coefficient of basic block is assessed;(5) reliability of basic block is assessed;(6) contribution degree of the basic block to operation profile is assessed;(7) migration probability between basic block is assessed under operation profile;(8) abatement controlling stream graph is equivalence control stream tree;(9) reliability of the tested software in given operation profile is calculated;(10) reliability of root node substitute node is reliability of the tested software on operation profile, terminates this time to run.

Description

A kind of software reliability estimation method based on basic block
Technical field
The invention belongs to software reliability field, and in particular to a kind of software reliability estimation method based on basic block.
Background technology
Software reliability is one of important quality attribute of software, for the system of safety-critical, software it is reliable Property require it is high, usually require that software failure rate be less than 10-7Below.But, current software reliability estimation method is difficult to full The such high reliability assessment requirement of foot.There is low, effective assessment data deficiencies of Evaluation accuracy etc. and ask in current software reliability Topic, is mainly reflected in following several respects:
A) maturation method that hardware reliability can not be used to assess
Software defect is all design defect, and the fatigue characteristic without similar hardware, the related fatigue of hardware reliability is commented The method of estimating is not used to carry out the reliability of software and assessed;
B) method based on Black-box Testing can not meet requirement
The failure behaviour of software is often closely related with specific software function and demand, it is difficult to a kind of unification, unanimously Method represent.Their signs in the process of running are different, from generating substantial amounts of software reliability model, such as Musa The dozens of models such as model, Jelinski-Moranda models, Goel-Okumoto models, NHPP models.Every kind of model considers The feature in a certain respect of software reliability, it tends to be difficult to which the reliability to software is comprehensively assessed.Most models all will Software regards a black box as, by carrying out Black-box Testing to software, using the trend of test failure data come assessment reliability.This The difficult point that a little methods face is that assessment result precision is relatively low, and assessing needs to gather the test data largely with statistical significance, Test job amount is huge.
C) method based on framework faces data acquisition difficult problem
Researcher has found that the framework of software has strong influence to the reliability of software.It is recommended that passing through whitepack mode pair Software reliability carries out analysis and evaluation.Propose respectively with discrete time Markov Chain (DTMC) and continuous time Markov The appraisal procedure of the software-oriented structure of chain (CTMC).These methods are in order to simplify assessment difficulty, often using the side of coarseness Formula is split to software, it is intended to is carried out using software architecture relation and assessed.But each software part itself be also can be by See an independent software as, how its reliability is assessed, how the interaction reliability between software is assessed to overall soft Part reliability has considerable influence, is difficult with which results in this kind of method.
The content of the invention
Goal of the invention:In order to support the software to Safety-Critical System to carry out accurate and effective assessment, software reliability is solved The problem of the several respects such as the data acquisition difficult, testing cost is too high, the assessment validity that are faced in evaluation process, the present invention is disclosed A kind of software reliability estimation method based on basic block.
Technical scheme:A kind of software reliability estimation method based on basic block, comprises the following steps:
(1) controlling stream graph is built
Using the controlling stream graph of binary code analysis software building tested software, controlling stream graph representation is a control System stream Matrix C FG=N × N=[tij], controlling stream Matrix C FG row and column is all basic block, if from i-th of basic block biArrive J-th of basic block bjThere is a control transfer, then tij=1;Otherwise tij=0;N represents tested soft in controlling stream Matrix C FG The quantity of the basic block of part;
(2) the defect coefficient matrix FN=[f of basic block are set up using the basic block instruction number of tested softwarei](0≤i≤ N), wherein fiRepresent basic block biIndex comprising defect
Wherein:
LiRepresent basic block biComprising instruction strip number, and 1≤i≤N;
(3) the potential number of defects of basic block is assessed
The latent defect number of each basic block is assessed, defect distribution matrix F C=[fc are constitutedi], latent defect number fciMeter Calculate formula as follows:
Wherein:
E represents the latent defect sum of software;
fkRepresent basic block bkDefect index;
I is basic block number, 1≤i≤N;
K is basic block number;1≤k≤N;
(4) the defect exposure coefficient of basic block is assessed
Tested using one group of test case set pair tested software, catch the number of run bc of each basic blocki, then Assess the defect hiding Probability p ff of each basic blockiFor:
If (a) basic block b in test processiDo not fail, then
If (b) basic block b in test processiThe number of times failed is eci, then
If (c) basic block biIt was not performed, i.e. bci=0, then bc is seti=1;
(5) reliability of basic block is assessed
Basic block b is calculated using defect exposure coefficientiReliability pi, its calculation formula is as follows:
pi=1-pffi
(6) contribution degree of the basic block to operation profile is assessed
Given operation profile, generates the test case matched with operation profile, then gathers the basic block b of operation profilei Execution number of times beThen the contribution degree cd of each basic block is evaluatedi
(7) migration probability between basic block is assessed under operation profile
Using controlling stream Matrix C FG as guidance, the system of linear equations constituted using following constraints, withFor parameter, ask Solution draws the migration probability between basic block;
Matrix the i-th row sum of controlling stream graphRepresent basic block biExecution number of times;
The matrix jth row sum of controlling stream graphRepresent basic block bjExecution number of times;
For basic block biWith basic block bjBetween migration probability pijFor:
Wherein:
nijRepresent from basic block biWith basic block bjThe number of times redirected;
N (i) represents basic block biExecution number of times;
(8) abatement controlling stream graph is equivalence control stream tree
From the basic BOB(beginning of block) of entrance, each basic block is traveled through, eliminates and is circulated present in controlling stream graph, obtain one and about solve Controlling stream tree, the controlling stream tree is binary tree, and several node is the reliability of basic block;The side of tree is represented from one Migration probability of the node to child node;
(9) reliability of the tested software in given operation profile is calculated
Recall since the leaf node of controlling stream tree, guidance traces back to root node, and retrogressive method is as follows:
(91) for node a and node b, their reliability is respectively raAnd rb, their father node is c, and reliability is rc, the probability from node c to node a, node b is respectively pcaAnd pcb, then create a new node c1, node c1It is reliable Property is:
Subsequently into step (92);
(92) deletion of node a, node b and node c, by node c1It is used as a leaf node of c father nodes;
(93) repeat step (91) and (92), the reliability until calculating root node substitute node, subsequently into step (10);
(10) reliability of root node substitute node is reliability of the tested software on operation profile, terminates this time to transport OK.
Further, the binary code component software in step (1) is that after being compiled by software compiler, can count Any executable software run on calculation machine, all instructions that all software kits contain can be gone out using disassemblers with dis-assembling, And find out the basic block that software is included.
Further, the control transfer in step (1) includes various conditions or definitely redirected or order execution.
Further, the latent defect sum of software is obtained by defect concentration method in step (3), if software is new Software is developed, defect concentration is 15/KoL, if software is ripe software, defect concentration is 4/KoL.
Further, leaf node refers to the basecoat node of controlling stream tree in step (92).
Beneficial effect:A kind of software reliability estimation method based on basic block disclosed by the invention has following beneficial effect Really:
A) fundamental based on this program of basic block, it is considered as the gene for software, basic block logical construction Simply, its reliability assessment is easier and accurately;
B) basic block to perform number of times, the migration number of times quantity between basic block larger, can be with therefore with statistical significance Support the reliability assessment to software, it is to avoid confidence level difference problem caused by data volume is very few during reliability assessment.
Embodiment:
The embodiment to the present invention is described in detail below.
A kind of software reliability estimation method based on basic block, comprises the following steps:
(1) controlling stream graph is built
Using the controlling stream graph of binary code analysis software building tested software, controlling stream graph representation is a control System stream Matrix C FG=N × N=[tij], controlling stream Matrix C FG row and column is all basic block, if from i-th of basic block biArrive J-th of basic block bjThere is a control transfer, then tij=1;Otherwise tij=0;N represents tested soft in controlling stream Matrix C FG The quantity of the basic block of part;
(2) the defect coefficient matrix FN=[f of basic block are set up using the basic block instruction number of tested softwarei](0≤i≤ N), wherein fiRepresent basic block biIndex comprising defect
Wherein:
LiRepresent basic block biComprising instruction strip number, and 1≤i≤N;
(3) the potential number of defects of basic block is assessed
The latent defect number of each basic block is assessed, defect distribution matrix F C=[fc are constitutedi], latent defect number fciMeter Calculate formula as follows:
Wherein:
E represents the latent defect sum of software;
fkRepresent basic block bkDefect index;
I is basic block number, 1≤i≤N;
K is basic block number;1≤k≤N;
(4) the defect exposure coefficient of basic block is assessed
Tested using one group of test case set pair tested software, catch the number of run bc of each basic blocki, then Assess the defect hiding Probability p ff of each basic blockiFor:
If (a) basic block b in test processiDo not fail, then
If (b) basic block b in test processiThe number of times failed is eci, then
If (c) basic block biIt was not performed, i.e. bci=0, then bc is seti=1;
(5) reliability of basic block is assessed
Basic block b is calculated using defect exposure coefficientiReliability pi, its calculation formula is as follows:
pi=1-pffi
(6) contribution degree of the basic block to operation profile is assessed
Given operation profile, generates the test case matched with operation profile, then gathers the basic block b of operation profilei Execution number of times beThen the contribution degree cd of each basic block is evaluatedi
(7) migration probability between basic block is assessed under operation profile
Using controlling stream Matrix C FG as guidance, the system of linear equations constituted using following constraints, withFor parameter, ask Solution draws the migration probability between basic block;
Matrix the i-th row sum of controlling stream graphRepresent basic block biExecution number of times;
The matrix jth row sum of controlling stream graphRepresent basic block bjExecution number of times;
For basic block biWith basic block bjBetween migration probability pijFor:
Wherein:
nijRepresent from basic block biWith basic block bjThe number of times redirected;
N (i) represents basic block biExecution number of times;
(8) abatement controlling stream graph is equivalence control stream tree
From the basic BOB(beginning of block) of entrance, each basic block is traveled through, eliminates and is circulated present in controlling stream graph, obtain one and about solve Controlling stream tree, the controlling stream tree is binary tree, and several node is the reliability of basic block;The side of tree is represented from one Migration probability of the node to child node;
(9) reliability of the tested software in given operation profile is calculated
Recall since the leaf node of controlling stream tree, guidance traces back to root node, and retrogressive method is as follows:
(91) for node a and node b, their reliability is respectively raAnd rb, their father node is c, and reliability is rc, the probability from node c to node a, node b is respectively pcaAnd pcb, then create a new node c1, node c1It is reliable Property is:
Subsequently into step (92);
(92) deletion of node a, node b and node c, by node c1It is used as a leaf node of c father nodes;
(93) repeat step (91) and (92), the reliability until calculating root node substitute node, subsequently into step (10);
(10) reliability of root node substitute node is reliability of the tested software on operation profile, terminates this time to transport OK.
Further, the binary code component software in step (1) is that after being compiled by software compiler, can count Any executable software run on calculation machine, all instructions that all software kits contain can be gone out using disassemblers with dis-assembling, And find out the basic block that software is included.
Further, the control transfer in step (1) includes various conditions or definitely redirected or order execution.
Further, the latent defect sum of software is obtained by defect concentration method in step (3), if software is new Software is developed, defect concentration is 15/KoL, if software is ripe software, defect concentration is 4/KoL.
Further, leaf node refers to the basecoat node of controlling stream tree in step (92).
Embodiments of the present invention are elaborated above.But the present invention is not limited to above-mentioned embodiment, In the knowledge that art those of ordinary skill possesses, it can also be done on the premise of present inventive concept is not departed from Go out various change.

Claims (5)

1. a kind of software reliability estimation method based on basic block, it is characterised in that comprise the following steps:
(1) controlling stream graph is built
Using the controlling stream graph of binary code analysis software building tested software, controlling stream graph representation is a controlling stream Matrix C FG=N × N=[tij], controlling stream Matrix C FG row and column is all basic block, if from i-th of basic block biTo jth Individual basic block bjThere is a control transfer, then tij=1;Otherwise tij=0;N represents tested software in controlling stream Matrix C FG The quantity of basic block;
(2) the defect coefficient matrix FN=[f of basic block are set up using the basic block instruction number of tested softwarei] (0≤i≤N), its Middle fiRepresent basic block biIndex comprising defect
Wherein:
LiRepresent basic block biComprising instruction strip number, and 1≤i≤N;
(3) the potential number of defects of basic block is assessed
The latent defect number of each basic block is assessed, defect distribution matrix F C=[fc are constitutedi], latent defect number fciCalculating it is public Formula is as follows:
Wherein:
E represents the latent defect sum of software;
fkRepresent basic block bkDefect index;
I is basic block number, 1≤i≤N;
K is basic block number;1≤k≤N;
(4) the defect exposure coefficient of basic block is assessed
Tested using one group of test case set pair tested software, catch the number of run bc of each basic blocki, then assess The defect hiding Probability p ff of each basic blockiFor:
If (a) basic block b in test processiDo not fail, then
<mrow> <msub> <mi>pff</mi> <mi>i</mi> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mfrac> <mrow> <msub> <mi>fc</mi> <mi>i</mi> </msub> </mrow> <mrow> <msub> <mi>bc</mi> <mi>i</mi> </msub> </mrow> </mfrac> </mrow>
If (b) basic block b in test processiThe number of times failed is eci, then
<mrow> <msub> <mi>pff</mi> <mi>i</mi> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mfrac> <mrow> <msub> <mi>ec</mi> <mi>i</mi> </msub> <mo>+</mo> <msub> <mi>fc</mi> <mi>i</mi> </msub> </mrow> <mrow> <msub> <mi>bc</mi> <mi>i</mi> </msub> </mrow> </mfrac> </mrow>
If (c) basic block biIt was not performed, i.e. bci=0, then bc is seti=1;
(5) reliability of basic block is assessed
Basic block b is calculated using defect exposure coefficientiReliability pi, its calculation formula is as follows:
pi=1-pffi
(6) contribution degree of the basic block to operation profile is assessed
Given operation profile, generates the test case matched with operation profile, then gathers the basic block b of operation profileiExecution Number of times isThen the contribution degree cd of each basic block is evaluatedi
<mrow> <msub> <mi>cd</mi> <mi>i</mi> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mfrac> <mrow> <msubsup> <mi>bc</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>o</mi> </msubsup> </mrow> <mrow> <munderover> <mo>&amp;Sigma;</mo> <mrow> <mi>i</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0</mn> </mrow> <mi>n</mi> </munderover> <msubsup> <mi>bc</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>o</mi> </msubsup> </mrow> </mfrac> </mrow>
(7) migration probability between basic block is assessed under operation profile
Using controlling stream Matrix C FG as guidance, the system of linear equations constituted using following constraints, withFor parameter, solve The migration probability gone out between basic block;
Matrix the i-th row sum of controlling stream graphRepresent basic block biExecution number of times;
The matrix jth row sum of controlling stream graphRepresent basic block bjExecution number of times;
For basic block biWith basic block bjBetween migration probability pijFor:
Wherein:
nijRepresent from basic block biWith basic block bjThe number of times redirected;
N (i) represents basic block biExecution number of times;
(8) abatement controlling stream graph is equivalence control stream tree
From the basic BOB(beginning of block) of entrance, each basic block is traveled through, eliminates and is circulated present in controlling stream graph, obtain a control about solved System stream tree, the controlling stream tree is binary tree, and several nodes is the reliability of basic block;The side of tree is represented from a node To the migration probability of child node;
(9) reliability of the tested software in given operation profile is calculated
Recall since the leaf node of controlling stream tree, guidance traces back to root node, and retrogressive method is as follows:
(91) for node a and node b, their reliability is respectively raAnd rb, their father node is c, and reliability is rc, Probability from node c to node a, node b is respectively pcaAnd pcb, then create a new node c1, node c1Reliability For:
<mrow> <msub> <mi>r</mi> <msup> <mi>c</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msup> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <msub> <mi>r</mi> <mi>a</mi> </msub> <mo>*</mo> <msub> <mi>p</mi> <mrow> <mi>c</mi> <mi>a</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>+</mo> <msub> <mi>r</mi> <mi>b</mi> </msub> <mo>*</mo> <msub> <mi>p</mi> <mrow> <mi>c</mi> <mi>b</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> <mo>*</mo> <msub> <mi>r</mi> <mi>c</mi> </msub> </mrow>
Subsequently into step (92);
(92) deletion of node a, node b and node c, by node c1It is used as a leaf node of c father nodes;
(93) repeat step (91) and (92), the reliability until calculating root node substitute node, subsequently into step (10);
(10) reliability of root node substitute node is reliability of the tested software on operation profile, terminates this time to run.
2. a kind of software reliability estimation method based on basic block according to claim 1, it is characterised in that step (1) binary code component software in any is held for what after being compiled by software compiler, can be run on computers Row software, can go out all instructions that all software kits contain, and find out the base that software is included using disassemblers with dis-assembling This block.
3. a kind of software reliability estimation method based on basic block according to claim 1, it is characterised in that step (1) the control transfer in includes various conditions or definitely redirected or order execution.
4. a kind of software reliability estimation method based on basic block according to claim 1, it is characterised in that step (3) the latent defect sum of software is obtained by defect concentration method in, if software is software newly developed, defect concentration is 15/KoL, if software is ripe software, defect concentration is 4/KoL.
5. a kind of software reliability estimation method based on basic block according to claim 1, it is characterised in that step (92) leaf node refers to the basecoat node of controlling stream tree in.
CN201710502732.4A 2017-06-27 2017-06-27 Software reliability evaluation method based on basic block Active CN107315684B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201710502732.4A CN107315684B (en) 2017-06-27 2017-06-27 Software reliability evaluation method based on basic block

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201710502732.4A CN107315684B (en) 2017-06-27 2017-06-27 Software reliability evaluation method based on basic block

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN107315684A true CN107315684A (en) 2017-11-03
CN107315684B CN107315684B (en) 2020-10-27

Family

ID=60179600

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201710502732.4A Active CN107315684B (en) 2017-06-27 2017-06-27 Software reliability evaluation method based on basic block

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN107315684B (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN115203059A (en) * 2022-09-09 2022-10-18 中国西安卫星测控中心 Method and system for evaluating reliability of aerospace measurement and control software

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20070174750A1 (en) * 2005-12-30 2007-07-26 Edson Borin Apparatus and method for software-based control flow checking for soft error detection to improve microprocessor reliability
CN102393832A (en) * 2011-10-14 2012-03-28 哈尔滨工业大学 Component software reliability analysis method based on improved additive model
CN104503913A (en) * 2014-12-27 2015-04-08 中国人民解放军63655部队 Component software reliability evaluation method based on migration paths and improved Markov chain

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20070174750A1 (en) * 2005-12-30 2007-07-26 Edson Borin Apparatus and method for software-based control flow checking for soft error detection to improve microprocessor reliability
CN102393832A (en) * 2011-10-14 2012-03-28 哈尔滨工业大学 Component software reliability analysis method based on improved additive model
CN104503913A (en) * 2014-12-27 2015-04-08 中国人民解放军63655部队 Component software reliability evaluation method based on migration paths and improved Markov chain

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
张广梅: ""软件测试与可靠性评估"", 《中国优秀博硕士学位论文全文数据库(博士) 信息科技辑》 *

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN115203059A (en) * 2022-09-09 2022-10-18 中国西安卫星测控中心 Method and system for evaluating reliability of aerospace measurement and control software
CN115203059B (en) * 2022-09-09 2022-12-09 中国西安卫星测控中心 Method and system for evaluating reliability of aerospace measurement and control software

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN107315684B (en) 2020-10-27

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN107967485A (en) Electro-metering equipment fault analysis method and device
CN104090861A (en) Dynamic outlier bias reduction system and method
Maccini et al. The interest rate, learning, and inventory investment
CN107992410A (en) Software quality monitoring method, device, computer equipment and storage medium
CN104809066A (en) Method for evaluating and predicting maintenance work load of open source software (OSS) based on code quality
CN111859249A (en) Ocean numerical forecasting method based on analytical four-dimensional set variation
Kazerouni et al. Assessing incremental testing practices and their impact on project outcomes
CN109508864B (en) Method for establishing enterprise default risk model based on xgboost
Chehade et al. Conditional Gaussian mixture model for warranty claims forecasting
CN113361690A (en) Water quality prediction model training method, water quality prediction device, water quality prediction equipment and medium
CN109961172A (en) A kind of CPS rare event probability forecasting method examined based on statistical model
CN106125713B (en) The assessment of reliability growth and prediction technique in the case of a kind of Interval censoring
CN110083518B (en) AdaBoost-Elman-based virtual machine software aging prediction method
CN110297765B (en) Early evaluation method for software reliability
Zorn et al. Replacing energy simulations with surrogate models for design space exploration
CN107315684A (en) A kind of software reliability estimation method based on basic block
Tailor et al. Comparative analysis of software cost and effort estimation methods: a review
CN108399284A (en) It is a kind of about subtracted based on deviation big data Trading Model analysis and restorative procedure
CN116756199A (en) Wind measurement data processing recommendation method and system
CN110083899A (en) Radar surveys recursion diagnosis and the self-repair method of metadata
Zhang et al. Multivariate discrete grey model base on dummy drivers
CN115587333A (en) Failure analysis fault point prediction method and system based on multi-classification model
CN113067352B (en) Power grid critical removal time prediction method based on EEAC and ELM
CN114968821A (en) Test data generation method and device based on reinforcement learning
CN102292706B (en) Software adapting appraisal procedure and Software adapting evaluating system

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
CB03 Change of inventor or designer information

Inventor after: Cheng Sheng

Inventor after: Qiu Huaqiang

Inventor after: Zhu Haitao

Inventor after: Wang Nan

Inventor after: Mu Hairong

Inventor before: Li Shangjie

Inventor before: Hao Xiaopeng

Inventor before: Guo Pengfei

Inventor before: Mu Hairong

CB03 Change of inventor or designer information
GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant
CP01 Change in the name or title of a patent holder

Address after: 100094 No. 28, Yongfeng Road, Beijing, Haidian District

Patentee after: Beijing Shenzhou Aerospace Software Technology Co.,Ltd.

Address before: 100094 No. 28, Yongfeng Road, Beijing, Haidian District

Patentee before: BEIJING SHENZHOU AEROSPACE SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY Co.,Ltd.

CP01 Change in the name or title of a patent holder