CN107272422B - Multivariable constraint control method of chip mounter driving system based on reference regulator - Google Patents
Multivariable constraint control method of chip mounter driving system based on reference regulator Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN107272422B CN107272422B CN201710682236.1A CN201710682236A CN107272422B CN 107272422 B CN107272422 B CN 107272422B CN 201710682236 A CN201710682236 A CN 201710682236A CN 107272422 B CN107272422 B CN 107272422B
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- chip mounter
- driving system
- theta
- mobile platform
- follows
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B13/00—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion
- G05B13/02—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric
- G05B13/04—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric involving the use of models or simulators
- G05B13/042—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric involving the use of models or simulators in which a parameter or coefficient is automatically adjusted to optimise the performance
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Artificial Intelligence (AREA)
- Computer Vision & Pattern Recognition (AREA)
- Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
- Medical Informatics (AREA)
- Software Systems (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
- Feedback Control In General (AREA)
Abstract
The invention discloses a multivariable constraint control method of a chip mounter driving system based on a reference regulator, and relates to the multivariable constraint control method of the chip mounter driving system. The invention aims to solve the problems that the starting system of the chip mounter is damaged due to overlarge speed in the moving process or the chip mounter cannot work normally due to the fact that the control input exceeds the maximum input provided by the chip mounter and the like. The invention comprises the following steps: firstly, establishing a dynamic model of a chip mounter driving system moving along an x axis or a y axis, and determining constraint conditions borne by the chip mounter driving system; designing a sampling controller for a chip mounter driving system; predicting the state of the chip mounter driving system and the size of control input when the reference signal does not change under the condition of assuming unmodeled dynamics of the chip mounter driving system and the condition that external disturbance is a constant value; and fourthly, designing a reference regulator to enable the chip mounter driving system to meet the constraint condition in the first step. The method is used for the field of multivariable constraint control of the chip mounter motion system.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to the field of multivariable constraint control of a chip mounter motion system, in particular to a multivariable constraint control method of a chip mounter driving system.
Background
In the working process of the chip mounter, according to different requirements, the chip mounter mobile platform is required to meet certain constraint conditions in the movement process, for example, the chip mounter mobile platform must move in a certain range, otherwise, the chip mounter mobile platform is caused to impact the edge of the chip mounter, and damage is caused to chip mounter equipment; the moving speed of the mobile platform of the chip mounter cannot reach infinity, or the moving speed of the mobile platform cannot be too high due to the limitation of the environment where the chip mounter is located; moreover, when the chip mounter works, the maximum voltage and current which can be provided for the chip mounter driving system are limited, namely the maximum control input which can be provided by the chip mounter driving system is limited, and when the required control input quantity exceeds the maximum value which can be provided by the shoe and the driving system, the chip mounter can not work normally. In order to solve the problem that the systems are constrained, a multivariable constraint control method based on a reference regulator needs to be provided.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention aims to solve the problems that the conventional chip mounter driving system is damaged due to overlarge speed in the motion process or the chip mounter cannot work normally due to the fact that control input exceeds the maximum input which can be provided by the chip mounter, and the like, and provides a multivariable constraint control method of the chip mounter driving system based on a reference regulator.
The multivariable constraint control method of the chip mounter driving system based on the reference regulator comprises the following steps of:
establishing a dynamic model of a chip mounter driving system moving along an x axis or a y axis, representing the dynamic model by using a state space model, and determining constraint conditions borne by the chip mounter driving system; the x-axis is transverse and the y-axis is longitudinal;
designing a sampling controller for a chip mounter driving system according to the dynamics model established in the step one;
predicting the state of the chip mounter driving system and the size of control input when the reference signal does not change under the condition of assuming unmodeled dynamics of the chip mounter driving system and the condition that external disturbance is a constant value; the state of the chip mounter driving system comprises the displacement and the speed of a chip mounter mobile platform;
and step four, designing a reference regulator according to the result predicted in the step three, so that the chip mounter driving system meets the constraint condition in the step one.
The invention has the beneficial effects that:
the method of the invention adjusts the reference input signal of the system in real time by designing the reference regulator, thereby limiting the system state or control input within the constraint range.
The reference regulator designed by the invention effectively solves the problem of constraint control of a chip mounter driving system, can realize the constraint on the displacement and speed of a chip mounter mobile platform and the applied control input size, and achieves the purposes of protecting chip mounter equipment and ensuring the control effect. As can be seen from fig. 5-9, during the operation of the pick-and-place machine, the displacement of the pick-and-place machine is constrained within 400mm, the speed is also constrained within a preset range, and the control input amount is almost everywhere less than 70% of the maximum input value.
Drawings
Fig. 1 is a closed loop system of a chip mounter driving system;
FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a closed loop system with a reference regulator applied;
fig. 3 is a state of the moving platform of the chip mounter system when the reference signal is a step signal and the reference adjuster is not applied;
FIG. 4 is a control input to the system when the reference signal is a step signal and the reference regulator is not applied;
fig. 5 is a motion trajectory of a moving platform of a chip mounter system when a reference signal is a step signal with a reference adjuster;
fig. 6 shows the moving speed of the moving platform of the chip mounter system when the reference signal is a step signal and the reference adjuster is provided;
FIG. 7 is a control input to the system with a reference regulator, where the reference signal is a step signal;
fig. 8 shows the reference signal r (t) ═ x0+100(1-cos(3.14t))(1-e-t) The state of the moving platform of the chip mounter system with the reference regulator;
fig. 9 shows the reference signal r (t) ═ x0+100(1-cos(3.14t))(1-e-t) With control input to the system referenced to the regulator.
Detailed Description
The first embodiment is as follows: the multivariable constraint control method of the chip mounter driving system based on the reference regulator comprises the following steps of:
establishing a dynamic model of a chip mounter driving system moving along an x axis or a y axis, representing the dynamic model by using a state space model, and determining constraint conditions borne by the chip mounter driving system; the x-axis is transverse and the y-axis is longitudinal;
designing a sampling controller for a chip mounter driving system according to the dynamics model established in the step one;
predicting the state of the chip mounter driving system and the size of control input when the reference signal does not change under the condition of assuming unmodeled dynamics of the chip mounter driving system and the condition that external disturbance is a constant value; the state of the chip mounter driving system comprises the displacement and the speed of a chip mounter mobile platform;
and step four, designing a reference regulator according to the result predicted in the step three, so that the chip mounter driving system meets the constraint condition in the step one.
Multivariate constraints refer to constraining the displacement, velocity, and control inputs of the mobile platform of the patch.
The second embodiment is as follows: the first difference between the present embodiment and the specific embodiment is: in the first step, a dynamic model of the chip mounter driving system moving along the x axis or the y axis is established, the dynamic model is represented by a state space model, and the specific process of determining the constraint conditions on the chip mounter driving system is as follows:
neglecting the positioning force and the coulomb friction force when the mobile platform of the chip mounter moves, establishing a dynamic equation when the mobile platform of the chip mounter moves along the direction of the x axis or the y axis according to a Newton's second law, and determining uncertain parameters M and B of a driving system of the chip mounter and a boundary of external disturbance or unmodeled dynamics by a least square identification method:
wherein M is approximately equal to 11kg epsilon [ theta ]1min,θ1max]=[10kg,15kg]For the mass of the mobile platform of the paster, theta1minAnd theta1maxAn upper and a lower bound for M respectively,andrespectively, the first derivative and the second derivative of x (t), the displacement of the mobile platform of the patch, u (t) is the control input, B is approximately equal to 7 N.s/m epsilon [ theta ]2min,θ2max]=[3N·s/m,20N·s/m]Is the viscous drag coefficient of the moving platform, theta2minAnd theta2maxThe upper and lower boundaries of B, d (t) representing the interference of the chip mounter driving system due to factors such as environment in the operation process or some secondary processes ignored in the process of establishing a mathematical model of the chip mounter driving system, which are respectively called external interference and unmodeled dynamics, and the value of the upper boundary of d (t) beingd0The above equation is rewritten as a state space model for 1N:
whereinIs a constraint set, x, of a chip mounter driving system1minAnd x1maxAre respectively x1(t) minimum and maximum values of interest, x2minAnd x2maxAre respectively x2(t) minimum and maximum values of preference, uminAnd umaxRespectively, a minimum and a maximum value of u (t) that are desirable.
Other steps and parameters are the same as those in the first embodiment.
The third concrete implementation mode: the present embodiment differs from the first or second embodiment in that: the specific process of designing the sampling controller for the chip mounter driving system according to the dynamics model established in the step one in the step two is as follows:
designing an adaptive sampling controller for the system as follows:
whereinRepresenting the kT time theta1Is determined by the estimated value of (c),representing the kT time theta2Is determined by the estimated value of (c), for the virtual sampling control law, the position of the mobile platform of the chip mounter at the kT moment is x1[k]The position error is z1[k]=x1[k]-r[k]At a velocity of x2[k]The velocity difference is z2[k]=x2[k]-α1[k],r[k]For sampling the input signal, T is the sampling time, k1、k2>0 is a parameter of the controller, and 0 is,for the robust term in the controller, ε is used to regulateAnd sgn (h [ k ]]·z2k) The parameter of the error magnitude between, tanh represents the hyperbolic tangent function, sgn represents the sign function,to representOperator pi through smooth projection1(theta) the value after the action of the compound,representing the passing of the projection operator pi2(theta) value after the action, smooth projection operator pii(θ), i ═ 1,2, should have the following properties
Specifically, the following forms can be selected
εiFor adjusting smooth projection operator pii(theta) and projection operatorThe size of the error between the two parameters,
The following forms can be selected specifically:
wherein i is 1, 2;
the resulting closed loop system is shown in block diagram form in fig. 1.
Other steps and parameters are the same as those in the first or second embodiment.
The fourth concrete implementation mode: the difference between this embodiment mode and one of the first to third embodiment modes is: in the third step, under the condition that unmodeled dynamics of the chip mounter driving system and external disturbance are assumed to be constant values, the specific process of predicting the state of the chip mounter driving system and the magnitude of the control input when the reference signal does not change is as follows:
defining a judgment function:
whereinThe definition of the representation is shown,when the input signal is r [ tau ]]Initial position x1Initial velocity of x2The position of the mobile platform of the time-paster at the moment T,when the input signal is r [ tau ]]Initial position x1Initial velocity of x2The speed of the mobile platform of the time-varying paster at the moment T,when the input signal is r [ tau ]]The position of the mobile platform of the paster isAt a speed ofControl input of a chip mounter driving system;
supposing that the external interference and unmodeled dynamics of the chip mounter driving system are constant values after t moment, predicting a reference input signal v of the modelpt[k]At Δ t0The time becomes constant in the following manner:
using an approximate model of a chip mounter driving system:
predicting a state of a system and controlling a maximum and a minimum x of an input during a future Δ t time period1pmax,x1pmin,x2pmax,x2pmin,upmax,upmin(ii) a Then at this point:
εvis a constant greater than 0, rc(t + kT) is the value of the reference signal after the initial adjustment at time t + kT.
Other steps and parameters are the same as those in one of the first to third embodiments.
The fifth concrete implementation mode: the difference between this embodiment and one of the first to fourth embodiments is: in the fourth step, according to the result predicted in the third step, the specific process of designing the reference regulator is as follows:
the reference regulator is designed as follows:
v[k]=v[k-1]+κ[k](rc[k]-v[k-1]),kT≤t<(k+1)T
wherein v [ k ]]Is the output of the reference regulator; k [ k ]]=K(x1[k],x2[k],v[k-1],rc[k]) For reference regulator parameters, K (x)1[k],x2[k],v[k-1],rc[k]) The definition is as follows:
Other steps and parameters are the same as in one of the first to fourth embodiments.
The following examples were used to demonstrate the beneficial effects of the present invention:
the first embodiment is as follows:
the resulting block diagram of the closed loop control system with the applied reference regulator is shown in fig. 2. The reference regulator and controller are applied to a particular placement machine. The a/D sampling time is taken to be 0.125ms, and the desired output is a step signal r (t) of 100. The design controller parameters were: k is a radical of1=5000,k28000. The parameter adaptive coefficients are: gamma ray1=γ 2100. Suppose that a real system is constrained as follows
Fig. 3 and 4 respectively show the motion state of the moving platform of the mounter system and the magnitude of the control input when the reference regulator is not applied, and it can be seen that the system of the mounter system is stopped because the control input is too large, exceeding the maximum value that can be provided by the mounter. Fig. 5, 6 and 7 show the motion trajectory, motion speed and control input magnitude for the placement machine system motion stage with reference to the actuators.
Reference trajectory r (t) x0+100(1-cos(3.14t))(1-e-t) The sampling time, controller parameters and parameter adaptation coefficients are unchanged. Suppose that a real system is constrained as follows:
fig. 8 and 9 show the motion state of the pick & place machine system motion stage and the control input magnitude, respectively, with reference to the actuators.
The present invention is capable of other embodiments and its several details are capable of modifications in various obvious respects, all without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention.
Claims (2)
1. The multivariable constraint control method of the chip mounter driving system based on the reference regulator is characterized by comprising the following steps of: the multivariable constraint control method of the chip mounter driving system based on the reference regulator comprises the following steps of:
establishing a dynamic model of a chip mounter driving system moving along an x axis or a y axis, representing the dynamic model by using a state space model, and determining constraint conditions borne by the chip mounter driving system; the method comprises the following specific steps of:
establishing a dynamic model of the chip mounter driving system moving along an x axis or a y axis, representing the dynamic model by using a state space model, and determining the constraint conditions on the chip mounter driving system, wherein the specific process comprises the following steps:
neglecting the positioning force and the coulomb friction force when the mobile platform of the chip mounter moves, establishing a dynamic equation when the mobile platform of the chip mounter moves along the direction of the x axis or the y axis according to the Newton's second law, and determining the uncertainty parameter theta of the driving system of the chip mounter by a least square identification method1And theta2And the bounds of the outside perturbation or unmodeled dynamics:
wherein theta is1∈[θ1min,θ1max]For the mass of the mobile platform of the paster, theta1minAnd theta1maxAre each theta1The upper and lower bounds of (a) and (b),is x1First derivative of (t), x1(t) is the displacement of the motorized platform of the patch,is x2First derivative of (t), x2(t) the speed of movement of the mobile platform of the chip mounter, u (t) the control input of the driving system of the chip mounter, theta2∈[θ2min,θ2max]Is the viscous drag coefficient of the moving platform, theta2minAnd theta2maxAre each theta2D (t) represents the external interference received by the chip mounter driving system or the unmodeled dynamics of the chip mounter driving system, and the upper bound is d0;
The chip mounter driving system is constrained in the following form:
whereinIs a constraint set, x, of a chip mounter driving system1minAnd x1maxAre respectively x1Minimum and maximum values of (t), x2minAnd x2maxAre respectively x2Minimum and maximum values of (t), uminAnd umaxMinimum and maximum values of u (t), respectively;
designing a sampling controller for a chip mounter driving system according to the dynamics model established in the step one;
predicting the state of the chip mounter driving system and the size of control input when the reference signal does not change under the condition of assuming unmodeled dynamics of the chip mounter driving system and the condition that external disturbance is a constant value; the state of the chip mounter driving system comprises the displacement and the speed of a chip mounter mobile platform, and the specific steps are as follows:
under the condition that unmodeled dynamics of a chip mounter driving system and external disturbance are assumed to be constant values, the specific process of predicting the state of the chip mounter driving system and controlling the input size when a reference signal does not change is as follows:
defining a judgment function:
when the input signal is r [ tau ]]Initial position x1Initial velocity of x2The position of the mobile platform of the time-paster at the moment T,when the input signal is r [ tau ]]Initial position x1Initial velocity of x2The speed of the mobile platform of the time-varying paster at the moment T,when the input signal is r [ tau ]]The position of the mobile platform of the paster isAt a speed ofControl input of a chip mounter driving system;
supposing that the external interference and unmodeled dynamics of the chip mounter driving system are constant values after t moment, predicting a reference input signal v of the modelpt[k]At Δ t0The time becomes constant in the following manner:
using an approximate model of a chip mounter driving system:
predicting the state of the drive system of the film sticking machine in the future delta t time period and controlling the maximum value and the minimum value x of the input1pmax,x1pmin,x2pmax,x2pmin,upmax,upmin(ii) a Then at this point:
εvis a constant greater than 0, rc(t + kT) is the value of the reference signal after the initial adjustment at the time of t + kT;
step four, designing a reference regulator according to the result predicted in the step three, so that the chip mounter driving system meets the constraint condition in the step one, wherein the specific process of designing the reference regulator is as follows:
the reference regulator is designed as follows:
v[k]=v[k-1]+κ[k](rc[k]-v[k-1]),kT≤t<(k+1)T
wherein v [ k ]]Is the output of the reference regulator к [ k ]]=K(x1[k],x2[k],v[k-1],rc[k]) For reference regulator parameters, K (x)1[k],x2[k],v[k-1],rc[k]) The definition is as follows:
2. The multivariable constraint control method for a reference conditioner-based mounter drive system according to claim 1, wherein: the specific process of designing the sampling controller for the chip mounter driving system according to the dynamics model established in the step one in the step two is as follows:
the self-adaptive sampling controller is designed for a chip mounter driving system and comprises the following steps:
wherein T is the sampling time, and T is the sampling time,representing the kT time theta1Is determined by the estimated value of (c),representing the kT time theta2Estimate of (a), α1[k]For the virtual sampling control law, the position of the mobile platform of the chip mounter at the kT moment is x1[k]The position error is z1[k]At a velocity of x2[k]The velocity difference is z2[k],,u[k]Representing the magnitude of the control input at time kT, k2> 0 is the sampling controller parameter, h k]For robust terms in the sampling controller, ε is the regulationAnd sgn (h [ k ]]·z2[k]) The parameter of the error magnitude between, tanh represents the hyperbolic tangent function, sgn represents the sign function,to representOperator pi through smooth projection1(theta) the value after the action of the compound,representing the passing of the projection operator pi2(θ) post-effect value;
smooth projection operator pii(θ), i is 1,2 is defined as follows
εiFor adjusting smooth projection operator pii(theta) and projection operatorThe size of the error between the two parameters,
are respectively the parameter theta1And theta2The specific form of the adaptive law adjusting function is as follows:
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201710682236.1A CN107272422B (en) | 2017-08-10 | 2017-08-10 | Multivariable constraint control method of chip mounter driving system based on reference regulator |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201710682236.1A CN107272422B (en) | 2017-08-10 | 2017-08-10 | Multivariable constraint control method of chip mounter driving system based on reference regulator |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN107272422A CN107272422A (en) | 2017-10-20 |
CN107272422B true CN107272422B (en) | 2020-05-12 |
Family
ID=60080220
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN201710682236.1A Active CN107272422B (en) | 2017-08-10 | 2017-08-10 | Multivariable constraint control method of chip mounter driving system based on reference regulator |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN107272422B (en) |
Families Citing this family (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN111061216B (en) * | 2019-12-28 | 2022-11-15 | 哈尔滨工业大学 | Intelligent chip mounter motion system control method based on binary spline scale function |
CN111273552B (en) * | 2020-03-16 | 2021-01-08 | 哈尔滨工业大学 | Chip mounter motion control method and system based on mathematical model |
Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2002261492A (en) * | 2002-02-04 | 2002-09-13 | Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd | Ic component mounting method and mounter |
CN101986317A (en) * | 2010-11-19 | 2011-03-16 | 常州奥施特信息科技有限公司 | Electronic whole set surface mounting technology production line virtual manufacturing system and realization method thereof |
CN103920623A (en) * | 2014-04-15 | 2014-07-16 | 中南大学 | Spraying and dispensing consistency control method and system |
CN204090326U (en) * | 2014-09-05 | 2015-01-07 | 冷晓勇 | There is the chip mounter of air pressure sampling plate |
CN104684271A (en) * | 2013-11-27 | 2015-06-03 | 三星泰科威株式会社 | A system for monitoring and predicting faults of SMT equipment and a method for operating the same |
CN106227511A (en) * | 2016-07-08 | 2016-12-14 | 常州奥施特信息科技有限公司 | General chip mounter program visualization Simulation Program method |
-
2017
- 2017-08-10 CN CN201710682236.1A patent/CN107272422B/en active Active
Patent Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2002261492A (en) * | 2002-02-04 | 2002-09-13 | Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd | Ic component mounting method and mounter |
CN101986317A (en) * | 2010-11-19 | 2011-03-16 | 常州奥施特信息科技有限公司 | Electronic whole set surface mounting technology production line virtual manufacturing system and realization method thereof |
CN104684271A (en) * | 2013-11-27 | 2015-06-03 | 三星泰科威株式会社 | A system for monitoring and predicting faults of SMT equipment and a method for operating the same |
CN103920623A (en) * | 2014-04-15 | 2014-07-16 | 中南大学 | Spraying and dispensing consistency control method and system |
CN204090326U (en) * | 2014-09-05 | 2015-01-07 | 冷晓勇 | There is the chip mounter of air pressure sampling plate |
CN106227511A (en) * | 2016-07-08 | 2016-12-14 | 常州奥施特信息科技有限公司 | General chip mounter program visualization Simulation Program method |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN107272422A (en) | 2017-10-20 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN107450316B (en) | Sampling adaptive robust control method of chip mounter driving system | |
JP5087073B2 (en) | Pressure control system with optimized performance | |
CN107272422B (en) | Multivariable constraint control method of chip mounter driving system based on reference regulator | |
US8170761B2 (en) | Method for real-time learning of actuator transfer characteristics | |
US8146481B2 (en) | Actuator, actuator control method, and actuator control program | |
CN105116725B (en) | Servo system self-adaptive sliding-mode control based on extended state observer | |
CN110673472B (en) | Adaptive robust control method based on neural network compensation dead zone inversion error | |
CN109202894B (en) | Robot performing learning control and control method thereof | |
US10183852B2 (en) | Load dependent electronic valve actuator regulation and pressure compensation | |
WO2014167808A1 (en) | Motor drive device | |
US20090222179A1 (en) | Dynamic learning of solenoid p-i curves for closed loop pressure controls | |
JP2008199883A (en) | Elimination system of unintended velocity reversal in s-curve velocity profile | |
JP4453526B2 (en) | Servo control device | |
JP5574228B2 (en) | An Adaptive Friction Compensation Method for Actuators Considering Friction Characteristic Variation with Temperature Change of Wave Gear Reducer | |
US11325251B2 (en) | Robot | |
WO2018195689A1 (en) | S-type velocity planning method, device and system, and robot and numerical control machine tool | |
KR20140126851A (en) | Non-tuning non-linear control method for servo controller having current limiting device | |
Raza et al. | Feedback linearization using high gain observer for nonlinear electromechanical actuator | |
WO2022247615A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for reducing acting force of robot on mounting platform, and storage medium | |
EP2620824A1 (en) | Method for moving an object | |
Mohammed et al. | Optimal controller design for the system of ball-on-sphere: the linear quadratic Gaussian (LQG) case | |
Hayashi et al. | Projection-based iterative learning control for ball-screw-driven stage using basis function and data-based friction model | |
WO2020003822A1 (en) | Control device, control method, information processing program, and recording medium | |
WO2016152074A1 (en) | Motor drive device | |
CN106325061A (en) | Control method for cabin door mechanism loading device |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PB01 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
GR01 | Patent grant |