CN107102544A - Global finite time Track In Track control method based on disturbance observer - Google Patents

Global finite time Track In Track control method based on disturbance observer Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN107102544A
CN107102544A CN201710297184.6A CN201710297184A CN107102544A CN 107102544 A CN107102544 A CN 107102544A CN 201710297184 A CN201710297184 A CN 201710297184A CN 107102544 A CN107102544 A CN 107102544A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
mrow
msub
mtd
mtr
mover
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
CN201710297184.6A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
王宁
吕帅林
余明裕
刘忠忠
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Dalian Maritime University
Original Assignee
Dalian Maritime University
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Dalian Maritime University filed Critical Dalian Maritime University
Priority to CN201710297184.6A priority Critical patent/CN107102544A/en
Publication of CN107102544A publication Critical patent/CN107102544A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G05CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05BCONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B13/00Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion
    • G05B13/02Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric
    • G05B13/04Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric involving the use of models or simulators
    • G05B13/042Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric involving the use of models or simulators in which a parameter or coefficient is automatically adjusted to optimise the performance

Abstract

The invention discloses a kind of global finite time Track In Track control method based on disturbance observer, with following steps:Set up the above water craft equation of motion for representing current ship kinetic characteristic and expect to carry transposed matrix R (ψ) in ship course model, the above water craft equation of motion;By Coordinate Conversion, by the above water craft equation of motion with expect ship course model conversion into standard second order nonlinear control system;Analysis obtains the error system in second nonlinear control system;Finite time flight tracking control rule and corresponding disturbance observer are provided, Track In Track control is completed.

Description

Global finite time Track In Track control method based on disturbance observer
Technical field
The present invention relates to a kind of global finite time Track In Track control method based on disturbance observer.It is related to patent point Class-mark G05 is controlled;Adjust the general controls of G05B or regulating system;The functional unit of this system;For this system or list Member monitoring or test device G05B13/00 adaptive control systems, i.e. system according to some predetermined criterion adjust automaticallies from Oneself with the system G05B13/02 electricity of optimum performance G05B13/04 including the use of model or simulator.
Background technology
In field of non-linear control, finite-time control method has obtained widely studied due to its fast convergence. Conventional finite-time control algorithm includes adding exponential integral, terminal sliding mode etc..In addition, thering is scholar to prove, in system asymptotically stability On the basis of, if being able to demonstrate that, its degree of homogeneity is less than zero, then closed-loop system can reach the control effect of finite time stability.
Traditional can not be to outside time-varying uncertain disturbance based on the minus finite-time control method of degree of homogeneity Handled, when its exterior disturbance is larger, system robustness is poor, and control performance declines.The invention is limited by introducing Time disturbance observer so that system can effectively recognize outside uncertain disturbance, and closed-loop system is when meeting global limited Between stable control effect, improve the robustness of control system.
The content of the invention
The proposition of the invention for being directed to problem above, and a kind of global finite time flight path based on disturbance observer developed Tracking and controlling method, with following steps:
- set up the above water craft equation of motion for representing current ship kinetic characteristic and expect ship course model, the water Transposed matrix R (ψ) is carried in the ship equation of motion of face;
- pass through Coordinate Conversion, by the above water craft equation of motion with expect ship course model conversion into standard second order Nonlinear control system;
- analysis obtains the error system in second nonlinear control system;
- when external disturbance meets following condition:
Wherein, n is positive integer, Hi=diag (hi,1,hi,2,hi,3), and hi,j(j=1,2,3) it is arithmetic number;
Finite time flight tracking control rule and corresponding disturbance observer are provided, Track In Track control is completed;
Described flight tracking control rate is as follows:
In formula,H is disturbance observer design parameter, H=diag (h1,h2,h3), meet h1>0,h2> 0,h3>0;WithIt is the disturbance observer quantity of state being derived by by disturbance observer;
The disturbance observer is as follows:
In formula:
Wherein, τ is derived by by flight tracking control rate formula, Τi=diag (Ti,1,Ti,2,Ti,3) (i=0,1 ..., n-1) be Disturbance observer design parameter, andAndαi=1+ (i+1) θ, αi>0, θ ∈ (- 1/ (n+1), 0).
As preferred embodiment, the described current above water craft equation of motion:
In formula:η=[x, y, ψ]TPosition (x, y) and deflection (ψ) of the expression above water craft under terrestrial coordinate system, ν= [u,v,r]TRepresent the linear velocity (u of ship,V) with angular speed (r), M is ship quality, meets M=MT>0, C (ν) is Ke Liao Sharp centripetal force matrix, D (ν) is damping matrix, τ=[τ123]TIt is control input, d=[d1,d2,d3]TIt is external disturbance, R (ψ) is a transposed matrix, is expressed as:
R (ψ) has following property:
Property 1:RT(ψ) R (ψ)=I;
Property 2:To arbitrary ψ, haveAnd RT(ψ) S (r) R (ψ)=R (ψ) S (r) RT(ψ)=S (r), And
As preferred embodiment, ship desired course is as follows:
Wherein, ηd=[xd,ydd]TAnd νd=[ud,vd,rd]TIt is to expect ship motion state.
Brief description of the drawings
, below will be to embodiment or existing for clearer explanation embodiments of the invention or the technical scheme of prior art There is the accompanying drawing used required in technology description to do one simply to introduce, it should be apparent that, drawings in the following description are only Some embodiments of the present invention, for those of ordinary skill in the art, on the premise of not paying creative work, may be used also To obtain other accompanying drawings according to these accompanying drawings.
Fig. 1-6 is not consider the simulation analysis result schematic diagram of external disturbance in the embodiment of the present invention
Fig. 7-13 is the simulation analysis result schematic diagram of consideration external disturbance in the embodiment of the present invention
Figure 14 is steps flow chart schematic diagram of the present invention
Embodiment
To make the purpose, technical scheme and advantage of embodiments of the invention clearer, with reference to the embodiment of the present invention In accompanying drawing, clear complete description is carried out to the technical scheme in the embodiment of the present invention:
As represented in figures 1 through 14:A kind of global finite time Track In Track control method based on disturbance observer, main bag Include following steps:
First, the above water craft equation of motion for representing current ship kinetic characteristic is provided,
Consider that the above water craft equation of motion is as follows:
In formula:η=[x, y, ψ]TPosition (x, y) and deflection (ψ) of the expression above water craft under terrestrial coordinate system, ν= [u,v,r]TThe linear velocity (u, v) and angular speed (r) of ship are represented, M is ship quality, meets M=MT>0, C (ν) is Ke Liao Sharp centripetal force matrix, D (ν) is damping matrix, τ=[τ123]TIt is control input, d=[d1,d2,d3]TIt is external disturbance, R (ψ) is a transposed matrix, is expressed as:
Also, R (ψ) has the following property:
Property 1:RT(ψ) R (ψ)=I;
Property 2:To arbitrary ψ, haveAnd RT(ψ) S (r) R (ψ)=R (ψ) S (r) RT(ψ)=S (r), And:
Consider that ship desired course is as follows:、
Wherein, ηd=[xd,ydd]TAnd νd=[ud,vd,rd]TIt is to expect ship motion state.
The final control targe of the present invention is one control law τ of design, and provides corresponding disturbance controller so that actual Signal (1) can track desired signal (3) in finite time.
In order to simplify disturbance controller design, we carry out following coordinate transform:
ω=R (ψ) ν (4a)
ωd=R (ψdd (4b)
Wherein, ω and ωdRepresent ship movement velocity new after coordinate transform, and ω=[ω123]T, ωd=[ωd,1d,2d,3]T, following table d herein expect by expression.
By property 1,2 and (1) and (4a) Shi Ke get:
Similarly, it can be obtained by property 1,2 and (3) and (4b)
Make ηe=η-ηd, ωe=ω-ωd.It can be obtained by (5) and (7)
In formula:
Γe()=Γ ()-S (ωd,3d-R(ψ)M-1f(·) (9)
Wherein, ηeAnd ωeThe site error after coordinate transform and velocity error, and η are represented respectivelye=[ηe,1, ηe,2e,3]T, ωe=[ωe,1e,2e,3]T
Using feedback line method, mission nonlinear Γe() can be eliminated by measurable η and ν by mathematical operation, And then simplify the design of controller.
When not considering external disturbance, this section design obtains the nominal control law of global finite time so that error system exists Finite-time convergence is proved it to zero point, and with Lyapunov Theory of Stability.
According to homogeneous theoretical and modified feedback linearization control method, when not considering external disturbance d (t), it can obtain as follows Global finite-time control rule:
Wherein,K1>0, K2>0,0<β1 <1,It is design parameter, sgn () is sign function, and
Prove:
Error system (8)-(9) are brought into control law (10)-(11), can be obtained
Choose Lyapunov functions as follows:
(13) derivation can be obtained along (12)
According to LaSalle invariant set theorems, closed-loop system (12) Globally asymptotic can be obtained.
System (12) can be written as
Wherein, f1()=ωe,j,It can thus be concluded that
According to homogeneity theory, the degree of homogeneity that can obtain closed-loop system (12) isWeight is accordingly
Analysis can be obtained more than, be less than zero in the secondly degree of closed-loop system Globally asymptotic, and system, thus may be used To obtain the global finite time convergence control of system.
Traditional can not handle external disturbance based on the minus finite-time control method of degree of homogeneity, work as external disturbance When larger, control input will not be able to ensure that systematic error converges to zero point.
Global finite time Track In Track control method based on disturbance observer
In view of it is traditional can not be to outside time-varying not based on the nominal control law of the minus finite time of degree of homogeneity It is determined that disturbance is handled, when its exterior disturbance is larger, system robustness is poor, and control performance will decline.This section is led to Cross introducing finite time disturbance observer so that system can effectively recognize outside uncertain disturbance, and closed-loop system is met The control effect of global finite time stability, improves the robustness of control system
Assuming that 1:Assuming that external disturbance is met
Wherein, n is positive integer, Hi=diag (hi,1,hi,2,hi,3), and hi,j(j=1,2,3) it is arithmetic number.
Theorem 2. is met in external disturbance to be assumed in the case of 1, and with reference to modified feedback linearization control method, design robust is adaptive Answer global finite time flight tracking control rule as follows:
In formula:
Wherein, H is disturbance observer design parameter, H=diag (h1,h2,h3), meet h1>0,h2>0,h3>0。With It is the disturbance observer quantity of state being derived by by designed disturbance observer (20), disturbance observer is as follows:
In formula:
Wherein, τ is derived by by (10) formula, Τi=diag (Ti,1,Ti,2,Ti,3) (i=0,1 ..., n-1) seen for disturbance Device design parameter is surveyed, andAndαi=1+ (i+1) θ, αi>0, θ ∈ (- 1/ (n+1), 0).
In order to which proof system error can be in Finite-time convergence to zero point, it is necessary to provide disturbance observer error, test Can disturbance observation error be demonstrate,proved in Finite-time convergence to zero.
Consider following coordinate transform
It can thus be concluded that
It is as follows that can obtain disturbance observation error system by (20)-(23):
Wherein,I.e.
By choosing suitable Ti,j, it can be ensured that (25) the global finite time stability of formula.It is furthermore noted that (25) formula is The Homogeneous System that it is θ < 0 that secondly one, which spent,.It can thus be concluded that,Can be in Finite-time convergence to zero. That is, external disturbance d (t) and its each rank differential d(1)(t),…,d(n-1)(t) it can be observed in finite time.
It can be obtained by (8)-(9) and (18)-(19)
Wherein,Exported by (19)-(20).
Have as seen through the above analysis in some finite time pointIt can thus be concluded that
Can be obtained according to theorem 1, closed-loop system finite time stability, namely actual heading track can in finite time with Desired trajectory on track.
Global finite time Track In Track control law (18) based on disturbance observer can not only ensure that desired signal has Limit reference signal on time tracking, additionally it is possible to which finite time estimates external disturbance, therefore control system has stronger robustness.
Embodiment and compliance test result
When not considering external disturbance, to being designed with limited time between nominal control law model carried out simulation study.Choosing It is K to take controller parameter1=0.24, K2=0.24, β1=1/3.Simulation result is as shown in figures 1 to 6.
Can be seen that from Fig. 1-Fig. 3 proposed in limited time between nominal control law model can cause in a short period of time The upper reference signal of desired signal tracking, and control effect be substantially better than it is traditional based on Backstepping (β1=control 1) Algorithm.
In addition, tracking error can converge to zero, as illustrated in figures 4-5.Corresponding control input such as Fig. 5.
Consider simulation analysis during external disturbance
Assuming that external disturbanceController parameter is chosen as follows:K1=1.0, K2= 1.0, T1=diag (10,10,10), T2=diag (32,32,32), α0=7/9, α1=5/9, α2=1/3, H1=0, H2= diag(0.05π2,-0.09π2,-0.08π2), corresponding simulation result is as shown in figs 6-12.
It can be seen from Fig. 6-8 when there is external disturbance, the global finite time Track In Track control based on disturbance observer Method processed is able to ensure that desired signal tracks reference signal in a short period of time, and control effect is substantially better than traditional base In backstepping flight tracking control method.
From Fig. 9-10 as can be seen that when there is external disturbance, proposed in limited time between nominal control law model (GFTC β1 =1/3) will not be able to make tracking error to converge to zero, and the global finite time Track In Track control law based on disturbance observer Model (ARGFTC β1=1/3) still may insure each signal errors in Finite-time convergence to zero.Corresponding disturbance observation As a result and control input as depicted in figs. 11-12.
The foregoing is only a preferred embodiment of the present invention, but protection scope of the present invention be not limited thereto, Any one skilled in the art the invention discloses technical scope in, technique according to the invention scheme and its Inventive concept is subject to equivalent substitution or change, should all be included within the scope of the present invention.

Claims (3)

1. a kind of global finite time Track In Track control method based on disturbance observer, it is characterised in that with following step Suddenly:
- set up the above water craft equation of motion for representing current ship kinetic characteristic and expect ship course model, the waterborne vessel Transposed matrix R (ψ) is carried in the oceangoing ship equation of motion;
- pass through Coordinate Conversion, by the above water craft equation of motion with expect ship course model conversion into standard second order non-thread Property control system;
- analysis obtains the error system in second nonlinear control system;
- when external disturbance meets following condition:
<mrow> <msup> <mi>d</mi> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mi>n</mi> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </msup> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mi>t</mi> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> <mo>=</mo> <munderover> <mi>&amp;Sigma;</mi> <mrow> <mi>i</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0</mn> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>n</mi> <mo>-</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </munderover> <msub> <mi>H</mi> <mrow> <mi>n</mi> <mo>-</mo> <mi>i</mi> </mrow> </msub> <msup> <mi>d</mi> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mi>i</mi> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </msup> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mi>t</mi> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> <mo>,</mo> <mi>i</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mn>1</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mo>...</mo> <mo>,</mo> <mi>n</mi> <mo>-</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow>
Wherein, n is positive integer, Hi=diag (hi,1,hi,2,hi,3), and hi,j(j=1,2,3) it is arithmetic number;
Finite time flight tracking control rule and corresponding disturbance observer are provided, Track In Track control is completed;
Described flight tracking control rate is as follows:
<mfenced open = "" close = ""> <mtable> <mtr> <mtd> <mrow> <msub> <mi>&amp;tau;</mi> <mrow> <mi>A</mi> <mi>R</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mo>-</mo> <msub> <mi>K</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> <msup> <mi>MR</mi> <mrow> <mo>-</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </msup> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mi>&amp;psi;</mi> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> <msup> <mi>sig</mi> <msub> <mi>&amp;beta;</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> </msup> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <msub> <mi>&amp;eta;</mi> <mi>e</mi> </msub> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> <mo>-</mo> <msub> <mi>K</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> <msup> <mi>MR</mi> <mrow> <mo>-</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </msup> <mo>(</mo> <mi>&amp;psi;</mi> <mo>)</mo> <msup> <mi>sig</mi> <msub> <mi>&amp;beta;</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> </msup> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <msub> <mi>&amp;omega;</mi> <mi>e</mi> </msub> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </mtd> </mtr> <mtr> <mtd> <mrow> <mo>-</mo> <msup> <mi>MR</mi> <mrow> <mo>-</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </msup> <mo>(</mo> <mi>&amp;psi;</mi> <mo>)</mo> <msub> <mi>&amp;Gamma;</mi> <mi>e</mi> </msub> <mo>(</mo> <mo>&amp;CenterDot;</mo> <mo>)</mo> <mo>-</mo> <msup> <mi>MR</mi> <mrow> <mo>-</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </msup> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mi>&amp;psi;</mi> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> <mover> <mi>d</mi> <mo>^</mo> </mover> </mrow> </mtd> </mtr> </mtable> </mfenced>
In formula,H is disturbance observer design parameter, H=diag (h1,h2,h3), meet h1>0,h2>0,h3> 0;WithIt is the disturbance observer quantity of state being derived by by disturbance observer;
The disturbance observer is as follows:
<mfenced open = "" close = ""> <mtable> <mtr> <mtd> <mrow> <msub> <mover> <mover> <mi>p</mi> <mo>^</mo> </mover> <mo>&amp;CenterDot;</mo> </mover> <mn>0</mn> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <msub> <mover> <mi>p</mi> <mo>^</mo> </mover> <mn>1</mn> </msub> <mo>+</mo> <msub> <mi>H</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> <msub> <mi>p</mi> <mn>0</mn> </msub> <mo>+</mo> <mi>u</mi> <mo>+</mo> <msub> <mi>T</mi> <mn>0</mn> </msub> <msup> <mi>sig</mi> <msub> <mi>&amp;alpha;</mi> <mn>0</mn> </msub> </msup> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mrow> <msub> <mi>p</mi> <mn>0</mn> </msub> <mo>-</mo> <msub> <mover> <mi>p</mi> <mo>^</mo> </mover> <mn>0</mn> </msub> </mrow> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </mtd> </mtr> <mtr> <mtd> <mtable> <mtr> <mtd> <mo>.</mo> </mtd> </mtr> <mtr> <mtd> <mo>.</mo> </mtd> </mtr> <mtr> <mtd> <mo>.</mo> </mtd> </mtr> </mtable> </mtd> </mtr> <mtr> <mtd> <mrow> <msub> <mover> <mover> <mi>p</mi> <mo>^</mo> </mover> <mo>&amp;CenterDot;</mo> </mover> <mrow> <mi>n</mi> <mo>-</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <msub> <mover> <mi>p</mi> <mo>^</mo> </mover> <mi>n</mi> </msub> <mo>+</mo> <msub> <mi>H</mi> <mi>n</mi> </msub> <msub> <mi>p</mi> <mn>0</mn> </msub> <mo>-</mo> <msub> <mi>H</mi> <mrow> <mi>n</mi> <mo>-</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </msub> <mi>u</mi> <mo>+</mo> <msub> <mi>T</mi> <mrow> <mi>n</mi> <mo>-</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </msub> <msup> <mi>sig</mi> <msub> <mi>&amp;alpha;</mi> <mrow> <mi>n</mi> <mo>-</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </msub> </msup> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mrow> <msub> <mi>p</mi> <mn>0</mn> </msub> <mo>-</mo> <msub> <mover> <mi>p</mi> <mo>^</mo> </mover> <mn>0</mn> </msub> </mrow> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </mtd> </mtr> <mtr> <mtd> <mrow> <msub> <mover> <mover> <mi>p</mi> <mo>^</mo> </mover> <mo>&amp;CenterDot;</mo> </mover> <mi>n</mi> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mo>-</mo> <msub> <mi>H</mi> <mi>n</mi> </msub> <mi>u</mi> <mo>+</mo> <msub> <mi>T</mi> <mi>n</mi> </msub> <msup> <mi>sig</mi> <msub> <mi>&amp;alpha;</mi> <mi>n</mi> </msub> </msup> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mrow> <msub> <mi>p</mi> <mn>0</mn> </msub> <mo>-</mo> <msub> <mover> <mi>p</mi> <mo>^</mo> </mover> <mn>0</mn> </msub> </mrow> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </mtd> </mtr> </mtable> </mfenced>
In formula:
p0e, u=RM-1τ+Γe(·)
Wherein, τ is derived by by flight tracking control rate formula, Τi=diag (Ti,1,Ti,2,Ti,3) (i=0,1 ..., n-1) seen for disturbance Survey device design parameter, and Ti,1>0,Ti,2>0,Ti,3>0。Andαi=1+ (i+1) θ, αi>0, θ ∈ (- 1/ (n+1), 0).
2. the global finite time Track In Track control method according to claim 1 based on disturbance observer, its feature Also reside in:
The described current above water craft equation of motion:
<mfenced open = "{" close = ""> <mtable> <mtr> <mtd> <mrow> <mover> <mi>&amp;eta;</mi> <mo>&amp;CenterDot;</mo> </mover> <mo>=</mo> <mi>R</mi> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mi>&amp;psi;</mi> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> <mi>&amp;nu;</mi> </mrow> </mtd> </mtr> <mtr> <mtd> <mrow> <mi>M</mi> <mover> <mi>&amp;nu;</mi> <mo>&amp;CenterDot;</mo> </mover> <mo>=</mo> <mi>&amp;tau;</mi> <mo>-</mo> <mi>C</mi> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mi>&amp;nu;</mi> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> <mi>&amp;nu;</mi> <mo>-</mo> <mi>D</mi> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mi>&amp;nu;</mi> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> <mi>&amp;nu;</mi> <mo>-</mo> <mi>g</mi> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mi>&amp;eta;</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>&amp;nu;</mi> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> <mo>+</mo> <msup> <mi>MR</mi> <mi>T</mi> </msup> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mi>&amp;psi;</mi> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> <mi>d</mi> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mi>t</mi> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </mtd> </mtr> </mtable> </mfenced>
In formula:η=[x, y, ψ]TPosition (x, y) and deflection (ψ) of the expression above water craft under terrestrial coordinate system, ν=[u, v, r]TThe linear velocity (u, v) and angular speed (r) of ship are represented, M is ship quality, meets M=MT>0, C (ν) is that Coriolis is centripetal Torque battle array, D (ν) is damping matrix, τ=[τ123]TIt is control input, d=[d1,d2,d3]TIt is external disturbance, R (ψ) is one Individual transposed matrix, is expressed as:
<mrow> <mi>R</mi> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mi>&amp;psi;</mi> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> <mo>=</mo> <mfenced open = "[" close = "]"> <mtable> <mtr> <mtd> <mrow> <mi>c</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mi>&amp;psi;</mi> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </mtd> <mtd> <mrow> <mo>-</mo> <mi>s</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mi>&amp;psi;</mi> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </mtd> <mtd> <mn>0</mn> </mtd> </mtr> <mtr> <mtd> <mrow> <mi>s</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mi>&amp;psi;</mi> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </mtd> <mtd> <mrow> <mi>cos</mi> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mi>&amp;psi;</mi> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </mtd> <mtd> <mn>0</mn> </mtd> </mtr> <mtr> <mtd> <mn>0</mn> </mtd> <mtd> <mn>0</mn> </mtd> <mtd> <mn>1</mn> </mtd> </mtr> </mtable> </mfenced> </mrow>
R (ψ) has following property:
Property 1:RT(ψ) R (ψ)=I;
Property 2:To arbitrary ψ, haveAnd RT(ψ) S (r) R (ψ)=R (ψ) S (r) RT(ψ)=S (r), and
<mrow> <mi>S</mi> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mi>r</mi> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> <mo>=</mo> <mfenced open = "[" close = "]"> <mtable> <mtr> <mtd> <mn>0</mn> </mtd> <mtd> <mrow> <mo>-</mo> <mi>r</mi> </mrow> </mtd> <mtd> <mn>0</mn> </mtd> </mtr> <mtr> <mtd> <mi>r</mi> </mtd> <mtd> <mn>0</mn> </mtd> <mtd> <mn>0</mn> </mtd> </mtr> <mtr> <mtd> <mn>0</mn> </mtd> <mtd> <mn>0</mn> </mtd> <mtd> <mn>0</mn> </mtd> </mtr> </mtable> </mfenced> <mo>.</mo> </mrow>
3. the global finite time Track In Track control method according to claim 1 based on disturbance observer, its feature Also reside in:
Ship desired course is as follows:
<mfenced open = "{" close = ""> <mtable> <mtr> <mtd> <mrow> <msub> <mover> <mi>&amp;eta;</mi> <mo>&amp;CenterDot;</mo> </mover> <mi>d</mi> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mi>R</mi> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <msub> <mi>&amp;psi;</mi> <mi>d</mi> </msub> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> <msub> <mi>&amp;nu;</mi> <mi>d</mi> </msub> </mrow> </mtd> </mtr> <mtr> <mtd> <mrow> <mi>M</mi> <msub> <mover> <mi>&amp;nu;</mi> <mo>&amp;CenterDot;</mo> </mover> <mi>d</mi> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mi>f</mi> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <msub> <mi>&amp;eta;</mi> <mi>d</mi> </msub> <mo>,</mo> <msub> <mi>&amp;nu;</mi> <mi>d</mi> </msub> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </mtd> </mtr> </mtable> </mfenced>
Wherein, ηd=[xd,ydd]TAnd νd=[ud,vd,rd]TIt is to expect ship motion state.
CN201710297184.6A 2017-04-28 2017-04-28 Global finite time Track In Track control method based on disturbance observer Pending CN107102544A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201710297184.6A CN107102544A (en) 2017-04-28 2017-04-28 Global finite time Track In Track control method based on disturbance observer

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201710297184.6A CN107102544A (en) 2017-04-28 2017-04-28 Global finite time Track In Track control method based on disturbance observer

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN107102544A true CN107102544A (en) 2017-08-29

Family

ID=59658054

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201710297184.6A Pending CN107102544A (en) 2017-04-28 2017-04-28 Global finite time Track In Track control method based on disturbance observer

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN107102544A (en)

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN108828955A (en) * 2018-08-16 2018-11-16 大连海事大学 Accurate Track In Track control method based on finite time extended state observer
CN110377044A (en) * 2019-07-24 2019-10-25 东南大学 A kind of the finite time height and Attitude tracking control method of unmanned helicopter
CN110687799A (en) * 2019-11-12 2020-01-14 大连海事大学 Fuzzy self-adaptive output feedback control method and system for intelligent ship autopilot system
CN111338213A (en) * 2020-03-17 2020-06-26 大连海事大学 Self-adaptive fuzzy two-part consistent control method for multi-underwater vehicle based on event trigger mechanism
CN111766890A (en) * 2020-07-24 2020-10-13 中南大学 Spacecraft performance-guaranteeing attitude control method independent of neural network approximation

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN103777635A (en) * 2014-01-13 2014-05-07 哈尔滨工程大学 Robust self-adaptive track tracking control system for dynamic positioning vessel

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN103777635A (en) * 2014-01-13 2014-05-07 哈尔滨工程大学 Robust self-adaptive track tracking control system for dynamic positioning vessel

Non-Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
SHUAILIN LV,等: "Disturbance observer based finite-time trajectory tracking control of unmanned surface vehicles", 《PROCEEDING OF THE 2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON UNDERWATER SYSTEM TECHNOLOGY: THEORY AND APPLICATIONS》 *
SHUAILIN LV,等: "Finite-Time Disturbance Observer Based Non-singular Integral Terminal Sliding Mode Trajectory Tracking Control of Unmanned Surface Vehicles", 《PROCEEDINGS OF 2016 IEEE CHINESE GUIDANCE, NAVIGATION AND CONTROL CONFERENCE》 *
SHUAILIN LV,等: "Global Finite-Time Trajectory Tracking Control of Autonomous Surface Vehicles", 《PROCEEDINGS OF THE 12TH WORLD CONGRESS ON INTELLIGENT CONTROL AND AUTOMATION》 *

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN108828955A (en) * 2018-08-16 2018-11-16 大连海事大学 Accurate Track In Track control method based on finite time extended state observer
CN110377044A (en) * 2019-07-24 2019-10-25 东南大学 A kind of the finite time height and Attitude tracking control method of unmanned helicopter
CN110687799A (en) * 2019-11-12 2020-01-14 大连海事大学 Fuzzy self-adaptive output feedback control method and system for intelligent ship autopilot system
CN110687799B (en) * 2019-11-12 2022-02-11 大连海事大学 Fuzzy self-adaptive output feedback control method and system for intelligent ship autopilot system
CN111338213A (en) * 2020-03-17 2020-06-26 大连海事大学 Self-adaptive fuzzy two-part consistent control method for multi-underwater vehicle based on event trigger mechanism
CN111766890A (en) * 2020-07-24 2020-10-13 中南大学 Spacecraft performance-guaranteeing attitude control method independent of neural network approximation
CN111766890B (en) * 2020-07-24 2021-09-14 中南大学 Spacecraft performance-guaranteeing attitude control method independent of neural network approximation

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN107102544A (en) Global finite time Track In Track control method based on disturbance observer
Wang et al. Yaw-guided trajectory tracking control of an asymmetric underactuated surface vehicle
Wang et al. Robust H∞ attitude tracking control of a quadrotor UAV on SO (3) via variation-based linearization and interval matrix approach
Jiang et al. Adaptive fault-tolerant tracking control of near-space vehicle using Takagi–Sugeno fuzzy models
Chen et al. Adaptive neural output feedback control of uncertain nonlinear systems with unknown hysteresis using disturbance observer
Li et al. Robust adaptive motion control for underwater remotely operated vehicles with velocity constraints
Zhang et al. Fixed-time output feedback sliding mode tracking control of marine surface vessels under actuator faults with disturbance cancellation
CN107247411A (en) Non-singular terminal sliding formwork Track In Track control method based on disturbance observer
Hassanein et al. Model-based adaptive control system for autonomous underwater vehicles
CN106842910A (en) A kind of Ship Steering Autopilot sliding-mode control based on interference observer
Lendek et al. Application of Takagi-Sugeno observers for state estimation in a quadrotor
Barisic et al. Sigma-point Unscented Kalman Filter used for AUV navigation
Patton et al. An LPV pole-placement approach to friction compensation as an FTC problem
Cao et al. Robust trajectory tracking for fully-input-bounded actuated unmanned surface vessel with stochastic disturbances: An approach by the homogeneous nonlinear extended state observer and dynamic surface control
Gao et al. Adaptive integral backstepping control for a 3-DOF helicopter
Yu et al. Robust backstepping tracking control of uncertain MIMO nonlinear systems with application to quadrotor UAVs
CN107817818A (en) Finite time control method for flight path tracking of uncertain model airship
Zeng et al. Learning from adaptive neural network control of an underactuated rigid spacecraft
Labbadi et al. A continuous nonlinear sliding mode control with fractional operators for quadrotor UAV systems in the presence of disturbances
Yu et al. Fault‐tolerant attitude tracking control with practical finite time convergence for unmanned aerial vehicles under actuation faults
Wang et al. Integral sliding mode based finite-time trajectory tracking control of unmanned surface vehicles with input saturations
Chang et al. Model-based fuzzy modeling and control for autonomous underwater vehicles in the horizontal plane
CN116088309B (en) Compound learning fault-tolerant control method for surface ship based on fault identification
CN107450313A (en) UAV autopilot control system based on Self Adaptive Control
Caiti et al. The project V-fides: A new generation AUV for deep underwater exploration, operation and monitoring

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
RJ01 Rejection of invention patent application after publication
RJ01 Rejection of invention patent application after publication

Application publication date: 20170829